G12-12 Ordinance No. G 12-12
•
AN ORDINANCE
RECLASSIFYING CERTAIN TERRITORY
FROM ORI OFFICE RESEARCH INDUSTRIAL TO
PORI PLANNED OFFICE RESEARCH INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
(Courtyards on Randall —2410 to 2420 Alft Lane,
1640 to 1670 Capital Street and 2445 Westfield Drive)
WHEREAS, written application has been made for a map amendment from ORI Office
Research Industrial District to PORI Planned Office Research Industrial District; and
WHEREAS, after due notice in the manner provided by law the Planning and
Development Commission conducted a public hearing concerning said application and has
submitted its written Findings of Fact and recommended approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin, Illinois, concurs in the Findings of
Fact and Recommendation of the Planning and Development Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Elgin hereby adopts the Findings of Fact,
dated December 5, 2011, made by the Planning and Development Commission, a copy of which
is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A.
Section 2. That the Official Zoning District Map as incorporated into the Elgin
Municipal Code by, Section 19.07.600 of said Code, is hereby amended to include in the PORI
Planned Office Research Industrial District:
"The boundaries herein before laid out in the `Zoning District Map', as amended,
be and are hereby altered by including in the PORI Planned Office Research Industrial
District, the following described property:
Part of Lot 18, Westfield Business Park, City of Elgin, Kane County,
Illinois according to the plat thereof recorded as Document 1931202 and also; part
of Lots 22, 23 and 24, Westfield Business Park Plat No, 2, City of Elgin, Kane
County, Illinois according to the plat thereof recorded as Document 2012687
described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 18; thence
North 88°47'45" West along the southerly line of said Lot, 152.80 feet for a point
of beginning, being the westerly line of Capitol Street as heretofore dedicated by
Document 2006K078969; thence continuing North 88°47'45" West along the
southerly line of said Lot, 238.0 feet; thence North 1'12'15" East 104.0 feet:
thence North 88°4745" West 18.11 feet; thence North 1°12'15" East 206.0 feet
Is to a point of curvature; thence northerly, northwesterly and westerly along a curve
to the left having a radius of 93.0 feet, tangent to the last described course, 152,19
• feet to a point of tangency; thence South 87°26'25" West 24.71 feet; thence North
1'12'15" East 232.82 feet to the northerly line of said Lot 22; thence South
88°47'45' East along the northerly line of said Lots 22 and 23, 82.67 feet to a
point of curvature therein; thence northeasterly along the northerly line of said Lot
23, being a curve to the left having a radius of 333.0 feet, tangent to the last
described course, 262.01 feet to a point of tangency therein, being the northwest
corner of said Lot 24; thence North 46°07'25" East along a northwesterly line of
said Lot, 166.58 feet to the southwesterly line of said Capitol Street; thence South
38'17'19" East along said southwesterly line 71.60 feet to a point of curvature
therein; thence southeasterly, southerly and southwesterly along a westerly line of
said street being a curve to the right having a radius of 183.0 , tangent to the last
described course, 196.96 feet to a point of tangency therein; thence South
23°22'39" West along a westerly line of said street 138.17 feet to a point of
curvature therein; thence southerly along a westerly line of said street, being a
curve to the left having a radius of 1053.0 feet, tangent to the last described
course, 407.70 feet to a point of tangency therein; thence South 1°1138 West
along a westerly line of said street 83.56 feet to the point of beginning in the City
of Elgin, Kane County, Illinois and containing 5.901 acres. All distances are given
in feet and decimal parts thereof. (Property commonly known as 2410 to 2420
Alft Lane, 1640 to 1670 Capital Street, and 2445 Westfield Drive, more
specifically identified by Kane County PIN Nos.: 03-31-277-044, -045, -046, -
047, -048, -049, -050, -051, -053, -054, -055, -056, -057, and -058).
• Now known as:
Unit A 100, Unit A 101, Unit B 100, Unit B 101, Unit C 100, Unit C5 00, Unit D 100,
Unit D101, Unit D501, Unit D502, Unit E100, Unit E500, Unit E501, and Unit
E900 in Courtyards on Randall Office Condominiums, as delineated an a Plat of
Survey of the following Described Tract of Land: Lot 22 and a Portion of Lots 2'
24 In Westfield Business Park Plat No. 2 and a Portion of Lot 18 in
Westfield Business Park, Both Being Subdivisions in a Part of the East Half of
The Northeast Quarter of Section 31, Township 42 North, Range 8, East of The
Third Principal Meridian, In Kane County, Illinois, Which Plat of Survey Is
Attached As Exhibit "D" to the Declaration of Condominium Recorded August
14, 2006, as Document Number 2006K088622, as amended from time to time;
together with its Undivided Percentage Interest in the Common Elements.
(Commonly referred to as the Courtyards on Randall)
(The land described in this Section 2 is herein called the "Subject Property".)
Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Elgin hereby classifies the Subject
Property in the PORI Planned Office Research Industrial District in accordance with the
following provisions:
•
A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PORI Office Research Industrial District
• is to provide a planned industrial environment that fosters a sense of place and
destination within a coordinated campus or park setting, subject to the provisions
of Chapter 19.60, Planned Developments. A PORI zoning district is most similar
to, but departs from the standard requirements of the ORI zoning district.
B. Supplementary Regulations. Any word or phrase contained herein, followed by
the symbol "(SR)", shall be subject to the definitions and the additional
interpretive requirements provided in Chapter 19.90, Supplementary Regulations;
of the Elgin Municipal Code, as amended. The exclusion of such symbol shall not
exempt such word or phrase from the applicable supplementary regulation.
C. General Provisions. In this PORI zoning district, the use and development of land
and structures shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.05, General
Provisions, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as amended.
D. Zoning Districts — Generally. In this PORI zoning district, the use and
development of land and structures shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter
19.07, Zoning Districts, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as amended.
E. Land Use. In this PORI zoning district, the use and development of land and
structures shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.10 Land Use, of the
Elgin Municipal Code, as amended. The only permitted, conditional, and similar
land uses allowed within this PORI zoning district shall be those permitted,
conditional, and similar land uses listed in Chapter 19.40.100, ORI Office
Research Industrial District, as it may be amended from time to time.
F. Site Design. In this PORI zoning district, the use and development of land and
structures shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.12, Site Design, of the
Elgin Municipal Code, as amended, except as may be otherwise provided in this
section. In this PORI zoning district, the site design regulations shall also include
the following:
1. General Conditions. The following general conditions will apply to the
development and maintenance of land and structures within this PORI
zoning district:
a. Substantial conformance to the Petitioner's Statement of Purpose
and Conformance, submitted with the development application
prepared by David N. Tanner, Carlson Partners, Ltd., as Attorneys
and Agent for Owner, dated received October 20, 2011.
b. Substantial conformance to the Proposed Landscape Setback Yard
Planting Plan, dated received October 20, 2011.
• C. Substantial conformance to the Courtyards on Randall Landscape
Plan, dated received October 20, 2011.
• d. Substantial conformance to the Landscape Maintenance and
Easement Agreement between DML Enterprises of Elgin, LLC,
IPC-Elgin, LLC, and Courtyards on Randall Office Condominium
Association that include the parties responsible for the
maintenance of the landscape yard located on the Lindley property,
dated January 17, 2012.
e. Compliance with all other applicable codes and ordinances.
2. Setbacks by Lot Line. In this PORI zoning district, the minimum required
"building" setbacks" and "vehicle use area setbacks" from a "lot line" for
a zoning lot shall be as follows:
a. Building Setbacks. In this PORI zoning district, the minimum
required "building setbacks" for a zoning lot shall be as follows:
(1) Street Setback. The minimum required building setback from
the Alft Lane "street lot line" and from the Westfield Drive
"street lot line" [SR] shall be thirty-five linear feet (35'); and
from Capital Street "street lot line" shall be twenty linear feet
(20').
• (2) Interior Setback. The minimum required building setback from
an "interior lot line" [SR] shall be twenty linear feet (20').
b. Vehicle Use Area Setbacks by Lot Line. In this PORI zoning
district, the minimum required "vehicle use area setbacks" for a
zoning lot shall be in accordance with § 19.40.135, unless as
modified below:
(1) Street Setback. The minimum required vehicle use area setback
from Alft Lane and from Westfield Drive shall be twenty-five
linear feet (25'), and from Capital Street shall be five linear
feet (5').
(2) Interior Setback. The minimum required vehicle use area setback
along interior lot lines shall be zero linear feet (0').
G. Off Street Parking. In this PORI zoning district, off street parking shall be subject
to the provisions of Chapter 19.45, Off-street Parking, of the Elgin Municipal
Code, 1976, as amended.
H. Off Street Loading. In this PORI zoning district, off street loading shall be subject
• to the provisions of Chapter 19.47, Off Street Loading, of the Elgin Municipal
Code, as may be amended.
I. Signs. In this PORI zoning district, signs shall be subject to the provisions of
• Chapter 19.50, Signs, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as may be amended.
J. Nonconforming Uses and Structures. In this PORI zoning district, nonconforming
uses and structures shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.52,
Nonconforming Uses and Structures, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as may be
amended.
K. Amendments. In this PORI district, application for text and map amendments
shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.55, Amendments. A text and map
amendment may be requested by an individual lot or property owner for a zoning
lot without necessitating that all other property owners in this PORI zoning
district authorize such an application.
L. Planned Developments. This PORI zoning district shall be subject to the
provisions of Chapter 19.60, Planned Developments, of the Elgin Municipal
Code, as may be amended. A conditional use for a planned development may be
requested by an individual property owner for a zoning lot without requiring an
amendment to this PORI zoning district and without necessitating that all other
property owners authorize such an application.
M. Conditional Uses. In this PORI zoning district, conditional uses shall be subject to
the provisions of Chapter 19.65 Conditional Uses, of the Elgin Municipal Code,
• as may be amended. A conditional use may be requested by an individual
property owner for a zoning lot without requiring an amendment to this PORI
zoning district and without necessitating that all other property owners authorize
such an application.
N. Variations. In this PORI zoning district variations shall be subject to the
provisions of Sections 19.10.500, 19.12.800, and Chapter 19.70, Variations, of the
Elgin Municipal Code, as may be amended. A variation may be requested by an
individual property owner for a zoning lot without requiring an amendment to this
PORI zoning district and without necessitating that all other property owners
authorize such an application.
O. Appeals. Any requirement, determination, or interpretation associated with the
administration and enforcement of the provision of this ordinance may be
appealed subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.75, Appeals, of the Elgin
Municipal Code, as may be amended.
Section 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage
in the manner provided by law.
".' - I-
David J. K ain ayor
•
0
Presented: March 21, 2012
uxesR�''
Passed: March 21, 2012
Omnibus Vote: Yeas: 6 Nays: 0
Recorded: March 21, 2012
Published: March 2'), 2012
Attest: ,
Kimberly Dewis,- Clerk
•
•
December 5, 2011
FINDINGS OF FACT
Planning and Development Commission City of Elgin, Illinois
SUBJECT
Consideration of Petition 29-11 Requesting an Amendment from ORI Office Research Industrial
District to the PORI Planned Office Research Industrial District, Property Located at 2410 to
2420 Alft Lane, 1640 to 1670 Capital Street, and 2445 Westfield Drive; by Carlson Partners,
Ltd., as Applicants, Attorney and Agent for Owner, and IPC-Elgin, LLC as Owners.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Requested Action: Map Amendment
Current Zoning: ORI Office Research Industrial District
Proposed Zoning PORI Planned Office Research Industrial District
Existing Use: Office Condominium Complex
_ Property Location: 2410 to 2420 Alft Lane, 1640 to 1670 Capital Street,
& 2445 Westfield Drive
Applicant: Carlson Partners. Ltd.. Attorney and Asient for Owner
Owner: IPC-EIo-in LLC
Staff Coordinator: Denise Momodu. Associate Planner
LIST OF EXHIBITS
A. Location Map (see attached)
B. Zoning Map (see attached)
C. Parcel Map (see attached)
D. Aerial Map (see attached)
E. Environmental Map (see attached)
�. F. Site Photos (see attached)
Exhibit A
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 29-11 December 5, 2011
• G. Development Application Package (see attached)
H. Related Correspondence (see attached)
I. Draft PORI Ordinance (see attached)
J. Landscape Maintenance and Easement Agreement (see attached)
BACKGROUND
An application has been filed by Carlson Partners, Ltd., Attorney and Agent for Owner,
requesting a map amendment from ORI Office Research Industrial District to PORI Planned
Office Research Industrial District. ..The subject property is located at 2410 to 2420 Alft Lane,
1640 to 1670 Capital Street, and 2445 Westfield Drive (reference Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, and F).
The property encompasses 5.9 acres of land area and is improved with the Courtyards on
Randall, consisting of nine office condominium buildings and related off street parking.
The. owner is requesting a map amendment to allow for a departure from the provisions of the
Zoning Ordinance with respect to vehicle use area setbacks. The property was recently
subdivided into two zoning lots — the subject property and the Lindley property. The resulting
• interior lot line separating the two lots was recorded along the westerly edge of the existing
parking lot of the subject property without the requisite vehicle use area setback of 6 feet. '
According to the Plat of Survey prepared by Western Surveying & Engineering, P.C, and dated
June 15, 2009, the provided vehicle use area setback is at the edge of the parking lot.
The zoning ordinance requires that a vehicle use area setback area be used as a vehicle use area
landscape yard. If visible from a public right-of-way, the yard is required to be landscaped with
trees, screening and ground cover. The purpose of landscaped vehicle use area interior setbacks
is to provide an effective visual screen between adjoining properties and their vehicle use areas
(reference Exhibits G, H, I and J).
The granting of the requested departures can only be provided through a planned development
approval that requires a public hearing and City Council approval.
FINDINGS
After due notice, as required by law, the Planning and Development Commission held a public
hearing in consideration of Petition 29-11 on December 5, 2011. The applicant testified at the
public hearing and presented documentary evidence in support of the application. The
Community Development Department submitted a Map Amendment Review, dated November
30, 2011.
• The Planning and Development Commission has made the following findings regarding this
application against the standards for planned developments:
- 2 -
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 29-11 December 5,2011
A. Site Characteristics Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
zoning district with respect to its size, shape, significant natural features (including
topography, watercourse and vegetation), and existing improvements.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to
the site characteristics standard.
The subject property is an irregularly shaped,parcel containing 5.9 acres of land area.
The property is developed with nine condominium office buildings, related off street
parking facilities, and has relatively flat topography.
B. Sewer and Water Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
zoning district with respect to the availability of adequate municipal water, wastewater
treatment, and storm water control facilities.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to
the sewer and water standard.
The subject property is served with municipal water and sanitary sewer systems.
Stormwater management is provided in conformance with the standards and regulations
of the City of Elgin and Kane County Stormwater Management Ordinances.
-• C. Traffic and Parking Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
zoning district with respect to the provision of safe and efficient on-site and off-site
vehicular circulation designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to
the traffic and parking standard.
The subject property is located on the west side of Randall Road, between Westfield
Drive to the north, Alft Lane to the south, and Capital Street to the east. Randall Road is
a regional arterial road serving the west side of Elgin and the surrounding communities.
Westfield Drive, Alft Lane and Capital Street are local streets, serving the adjacent office
and industrial land uses. Access to the property is provided via Westfield Drive, Alft
Lane and Capital Street.
Off street parking is provided in conformance with the Off Street Parking Ordinance.
D. Zoning History Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning
district with respect to the length of time the property has remained undeveloped or
unused in its current zoning district.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to
• the length of time the property has remained undeveloped or unused in its current zoning
district.
- J -
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 29-11 December 5, 2011
• The subject property was zoned as follows for the years listed:
1927: Out of City Limits
1950: Out of City Limits
1960: Out of City Limits
1961: Out of City Limits
1962: Out of City Limits
1992: M-2 General Manufacturing District
Present: ORI Office Research Industrial District
The subject property was annexed in 1988 as part of Westfield Park of Commerce
annexation and zoned M2 General Manufacturing District. The subject property is
located in the Westfield Business Park and was reclassified to ORI Office Research
Industrial District as part of the comprehensive amendment to the zoning ordinance in
1992.
E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Standard The suitability of the subject property for
the intended zoning district with respect to consistency and compatibility with
surrounding land use and zoning.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to
consistency and compatibility with surrounding land use and zoning.
• The areas to the north and northwest are zoned ORI Office Research Industrial District,
and have developed with a medical office building and Chase Bank Credit Card Services.
The areas to the south, east and west are zoned PORI Planned Office Research and
Industrial District, and have developed with manufacturing uses and medical office
buildings.
F. Trend of Development Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
zoning district with respect to consistency with an existing pattern of development or an
identifiable trend of development in the area.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to
consistency with an existing pattern of development or an identifiable trend within the
area.
The subject property is located within a developing office, research, and industrial area,
benefitted by its close proximity to the Randall Road corridor.
G. Planned Development District Standard The suitability of the subject property for the
intended zoning district with respect to conformance to the provisions for the purpose
and intent, and the location and size of a zoning district.
• The purpose of the PORI Office Research Industrial District is to provide a planned
industrial environment that fosters a sense of place and destination within a coordinated
campus or park setting, subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.60, Planned Developments.
- 4 -
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 29-11 December 5, 2011
("�• A PORI zoning district is most similar to, but departs from the standard requirements of
the ORI zoning district.
In general, the purpose and intent of the provision for planned developments is to
accommodate unique development situations. For planned development districts, the
planned development should demonstrate the following characteristics:
1. An opportunity to realize a development of demonstrated need with respect to the
types of environment available to the public that would not be possible under the
strict application of the other chapters of this title.
2. A creative approach to the use of land and related improvements resulting in
better design and construction of aesthetic amenities.
3. The preservation of significant natural features including topography,
watercourses, wetlands, and vegetation.
Planned industrial districts should be located in substantial conformance to the official
comprehensive plan. The amount necessary to constitute a separate planned industrial
district exclusive of right of way, but including adjoining land or land directly opposite a
right of way shall be less than two acres. No departure from the required minimum size
of planned development district shall be granted fi-om the city council.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to
�; • conformance to the provision for the purpose and intent, and the location and size of a
PORI Planned Office Research Industrial District.
The proposed map amendment is in substantial conformance with the purpose and intent
of the planned development provisions providing for a development that meets a
demonstrated need with respect to the types of environment available to the public that
would not be possible under the strict application of the other chapters of this title.
The owner is proposing to install landscape material in the amount of two times the
required landscape material. However, due to the lack of a vehicle use area landscape
yard on the subject property, the property owner has undertaken an agreement to install
and maintain 36 new trees and 276 new shrubs on the adjacent "Lindley property" and
within vehicle use area landscape yards located elsewhere on the subject property.
H. Comprehensive Plan Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
zoning district with respect to conformance to the goals, objectives, and policies of the
official comprehensive plan.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to
the Comprehensive Plan Standard.
The subject property is designated as "Office/Research/Industrial" by the Comprehensive
• Plan and Design Guidelines (2005). The Office/Research/Industrial designation allows
for a variety of office, industrial, manufacturing, assembly, warehouse, distribution,
research and development, technology, corporate and support office, and limited
- 5 -
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition-29-11 December 5, 2011
• employee-serving retail uses. These activities typically locate in business parks.
Appropriate locations offer direct access to the arterial street system, and are in close
proximity to highways, the freeway system and interchanges. The proposed map
amendment is in conformance with this designation.
L Natural Preservation Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
planned development with respect to the preservation of all significant natural features
including topography, watercourses, wetlands, and vegetation.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with
respect to the Natural Preservation Standard.
There are no natural features present at the subject property.
J. Internal Land Use Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
planned development with respect to the land uses permitted within the development
being located, designed, and operated so as to exercise no undue detrimental influence
on each other or on surrounding property.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with
respect to the internal land use standard.
• No evidence has been submitted or found that the planned development is located,
designed, or operated in a manner that will exercise undue detrimental influence on itself
or surrounding property. The planned district ordinance is intended to prevent undue
detrimental influence on the proposed internal land uses within the subject property and
on surrounding properties.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DEPARTURES AND EXCEPTIONS
A planned development may be granted certain departures from the normal standards,
regulations, requirements, and procedures of the zoning ordinance. For the purposes of this
section, the most similar zoning district is the ORI Office Research Industrial District. The
applicant is requesting the following departure from the standard requirements of the ORI Office
Research Industrial District:
A. Section 19.40.135: E.2.b. Vehicle Use Area Interior Setback. The ORI District
requires a minimum vehicle use area setback of 6 feet for a lot this size from an interior
lot line. The existing vehicle use area setback is approximately 1 foot.. Accordingly, the
owner is requesting a 6 foot (100%), departure from the minimum required vehicle use
area setback.
B. Section 19.40.135: I3.2. Vehicle Use Area Landscape Yard. The ORI District requires
that the yards established by the vehicle use area setback shall be used as the vehicle use
area landscape yard. The owner is requesting a 100% departure from the minimum
required vehicle use area landscape yard.
- 6 -
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 29-11 December 5, 2011
C. Section 19.12.720: B Vehicle Use Area Landscape Yard. The purpose of the vehicle
use area landscape yard us to moderate the visual impact of parking lots and drive aisles
by screening them from views from adjoining streets and properties. The owner is
requesting a 100% departure from the minimum required vehicle use area landscape yard.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, UNRESOLVED ISSUES AND ALTERNATIVES
The Planning and Development Commission has developed or identified the following findings,
unresolved issues and alternatives:
A. Summary of Findings
Positive Attributes: No evidence has been submitted or found that the proposed planned
development is located, designed, or operated in a manner that will exercise undue
detrimental influence on itself or surrounding property. The planned district ordinance is
intended to prevent undue detrimental influence on the proposed internal land uses within
the subject property and on surrounding properties. Development of the subject property
will be subject to the terms and conditions of the proposed planned district zoning
ordinance. The owner is proposing to mitigate the requested departures by installing two
times the required landscape material amounting to 36 trees and 276 shrubs on the
i • adjacent "Lindley property" and within vehicle use area landscape yards located
elsewhere on the subject property.
B. Summary of Unresolved Issues.
There are no unresolved issues.
C. Summary of Alternatives.
Other than an approval, a denial, or an approval with some combination of conditions,
there are no substantive alternatives.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Development Commission recommends approval of Petition 29-11. On a
motion to recommend approval, subject to the following conditions, the vote was five (5) yes and
zero (0) no.
1. Substantial conformance to the Petitioner's Statement of Purpose and Conformance,
submitted with the development application prepared by David N. Tanner, Carlson
Partners, Ltd., as Attorneys and Agent for Owner, dated received October 20, 2011.
2. Substantial conformance to the Proposed Landscape Setback Yard Planting Plan, dated
received October 20. 2011.
- 7 -
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 29-11 December 5, 2011
t
3. Substantial conformance to the Courtyards on Randall Landscape Plan, dated received
October 20, 2011.
4. Substantial conformance to the Landscape Maintenance and Easement Agreement
between DML Enterprises of Elgin, LLC, IPC-El,n, LLC, and Courtyards on Randall
Office Condominium Association that include the parties responsible for the maintenance
of the landscape yard located on the Lindley property.
5. Compliance with all other applicable codes and ordinances.
Therefore, the motion to recommend approval of Petition 29-11 was adopted.
Respectfully submitted:
s/Robert Siljestrom
Robert Siljestrom, Chairman
Planning and Development Commission
s/ Sarosh Saber
Sarosh Saber, Secretary
Planning and Development Commission
- 8 -