Loading...
G61-07 Ordinance No. G61-07 AN ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING PROPERTY FROM CF COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICT AND RC3 RESIDENCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT TO PRC PLANNED RESIDENCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT (111 North Channing Street, 468 Division Street and a Portion of 472 Division Street) WHEREAS, written application has been made to reclassify certain property located at 111 North Channing Street, 468 Division Street and a portion of 472 Division Street from CF Community Facility District and RC3 Residence Conservation District to PRC Planned Residence Conservation District; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Commission has conducted a public hearing concerning said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Commission on a motion to recommend approval on said application voted 2-2 thereby resulting in a recommendation of denial of said application; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Group has submitted written findings on said application and a recommendation that the application be granted and the subject property be reclassified; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the findings and recommendation of the Community Development Group and concurs in such recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Elgin hereby adopts the findings made by the Community Development Group in the Map Amendment Review, dated October 18, 2007, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A. Section 2. That Chapter 19.08, Section 19.08.020 entitled Zoning District Map of the Elgin Municipal Code, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by adding thereto the following paragraph: The boundaries hereinafter laid out in the Zoning District Map, as amended, be and are hereby altered by including in the PRC Planned Residence Conservation District the following described property: Lots 1-11 and Lot 12 (except the east 10 feet) and the vacated Wauchope Court of Roy C. Wauchope's Subdivision, being a subdivision of part of the County Clerk's i-. Subdivision of E. H. Hotchkiss Addition to the City of Elgin, in the City of Elgin, Kane County, Illinois (Property commonly known as 111 North Charming Street). The east 10 feet of lot 12 and all of lot 13 in Roy C. Wauchope's Subdivision,being a subdivision of part of Lot "A" of the County Clerk's Subdivision of E. H. Hotchkiss Addition, in Elgin Township, Kane County, Illinois (Property commonly known as 468 Division Street). The north 40 feet of that part of E. H. Hotchkiss Addition to Elgin, described as follows: beginning at the point of intersection of the North Line of Division Street with the west line of Hilton Place Addition to Elgin; thence north along the west line of said Hilton Place Addition 165 feet; thence west parallel with the north line of said Division Street 66 feet; thence south parallel with the west line of said Hilton Place Addition 165 feet to the north line of Division Street; thence east along said north line 66 feet to the point of beginning, in the City of Elgin, Kane County, Illinois(Property commonly known as a portion of 472 Division Street). Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Elgin hereby grants the rezoning from CF Community Facility District and RC3 residence Conservation District to PRC Planned Residence Conservation District for the property commonly known as 111 North Channing Street, 468 Division Street and a portion of 472 Division Street, and legally described above, which shall be designed,developed, and operated subject to the following provisions: elibk A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the residence conservation districts is to provide for the conservation of the urban residential environment of the mature residential neighborhoods of the city, which developed under significantly different regulations than the current regulations for new residential development. In general, the purpose and intent of the provision for planned developments is to accommodate unique development situations. B. Supplementary Regulations. Any word or phrase contained herein, followed by the symbol "SR", shall be subject to the definitions and the additional interpretive requirements provided in Chapter 19.90, Supplementary Regulations, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as amended. The exclusion of such symbol shall not exempt such word or phrase from the applicable supplementary regulation. C. General Provisions. In this PRC District, the use and development of land and structures shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.05, General Provisions, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as may be amended. D. Zoning Districts - Generally. In this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, the use and development of land and structures shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.07,Zoning Districts, as may be amended. 2 r. E. Land Use. In this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, the use and development of land and structures shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.10, Land Use, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as amended. The following enumerated "land uses" [SR] shall be the only land uses allowed as a "permitted use" [SR], in this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District: 1. Residences Division: "Residential garage sales" [SR] (UNCL). "Residential occupations" [SR] (UNCL). "Residential parking areas" [SR] (UNCL). "Residential storage" [SR] (UNCL). "Singe-Family detached dwellings" [SR] (UNCL). 2. Municipal Services Division: Public parks, recreation, open space (UNCL) on a"zoning lot" [SR] containing less than two (2) acres of land. 3. Finance,Insurance, and Real Estate Division: "Development sales office" [SR] (UNCL). 4. Intentionally Omitted. 5. Construction Division: "Contractor's office and equipment areas" [SR] (UNCL). 6. Transportation, Communication and Utilities Division: "Radio and television antennas" [SR] (UNCL). "Satellite dish antennas" [SR] (UNCL). "Treatment, transmission, and distribution facilities: poles, wires, cables, conduits, laterals, vaults, pipes, mains, and valves" [SR] (UNCL). 7. Miscellaneous Uses Division: "Accessory uses" [SR] (UNCL)to the permitted uses allowed in this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, subject to the provisions of Section 19.10.400 of the Elgin Municipal Code, as amended. rik "Fences and walls" [SR] (UNCL). 3 "Refuse collection area" [SR]. "Signs" [SR] (UNCL), subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.50 of the Elgin Municipal Code, as amended. "Temporary uses" [SR] (UNCL). In this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, the use and development of land and structures shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.10, Land Use, of the Elgin Municipal Code, 1976, as amended. The following enumerated "land uses" [SR] shall be the only land uses allowed as a "conditional use" [SR] in this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District: 1. Residences Division: "Conditional residential occupations" [SR] (UNCL). 2. Municipal Services Division: "Municipal facilities" [SR] (UNCL) on a zoning lot containing less than two (2) acres of land. 3. Intentionally Omitted. 4. Miscellaneous Uses Division: "Accessory uses" [SR] (UNCL)to the conditional uses allowed in this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, subject to the provisions of Section 19.10.400 of the Elgin Municipal Code, as amended. F. Site Design. In this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, the use and development of land and structures shall be subject to the provisions of Section 19.12, Site Design, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as amended. The development of land and structures shall be in substantial conformance with the following: 1. Substantial conformance to the Statement of Purpose and Conformance, submitted by the applicant, represented by Jerome W. Pinderski, Jr., of Pinderski & Pinderski, Ltd., undated. 2. Substantial Conformance to the Plat of Subdivision prepared by Land Surveying Services, Inc, dated October 15, 2007. 3. Substantial conformance to the Dimensioned Site Plan prepared by BSB Design, dated August 8, 2007 and last revised on October 11, 2007. 4. Substantial conformance to the Site landscape Plans, Sheets L1.1 and L1.2, prepared by BSB Design, dated August 8, 2007 and last revised on October 11, 2007. 4 5. Substantial conformance to the preliminary engineering drawings prepared by Seton Engineering titled "Proposed Improvements for Channing Square, Elgin Illinois," Sheets C.1-C.12, dated June 10, 2007, and last revised on October 10, 2007. 6. Substantial conformance to the building plans and elevations, sections, and details for Concepts 1-3, and garage plans, elevations and sections, prepared by BSB Design, dated May 29, 2007, and last revised on August 17, 2007. 7. Compliance with all other applicable codes and ordinances. G. Off Street Parking. In this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, off street parking shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.45, Off Street Parking, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as may be amended. H. Off Street Loading. In this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, off street loading shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.47, Off Street Loading, as may be amended from time to time. Signs. In this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, signs shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.50, Signs, as may be amended from time to time. rink J. Planned Developments. In this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District,the use and development of the land and structures shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.60, Planned Developments, as may be amended. A conditional use for a planned development may be requested by an individual lot or property owner for a zoning lot without requiring an amendment to this PRC zoning district and without necessitating that all other property owners authorize such an application. K. Conditional Uses. In this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, application for conditional uses shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.65, Conditional Uses, as may be amended. A conditional use may be requested by an individual property owner for a zoning lot without requiring an amendment to this PRC zoning district and without necessitating that all other property owners authorize such an application. L. Variations. In this PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, application for variation shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.70, Variations, as may be amended. A variation may be requested by an individual property owner for a zoning lot without requiring an amendment to this PRC zoning district and without necessitating that all other property owners authorize such an application. r 5 M. Appeals. Any requirement, determination, or interpretation associated with the administration and enforcement of the provisions of this ordinance may be appealed subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.75,Appeals, as may be amended from time to time. Section 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage in the manner provided by law. Ed Schock, Mayor Presented: October 24, 2007 Passed: October 24, 2007 Vote: Yeas: 5 Nays: 2 Recorded: October 25, 2007 Published: Attest: Diane Robertson, Ci Clerk 6 October 18, 2007 MAP AMENDMENT REVIEW Community Development Group City of Elgin,Illinois SUBJECT Consideration of Petition 59-07 Requesting Approval of a Map Amendment from CF Community Facility District and RC3 Residence Conservation District to PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, and Final Plat Approval, for a Residential Subdivision to be known as Channing Square; Property Located at 111 North Channing Street, 468 Division Street and a portion of 472 Division Street,by Channing Square, LLC., as Applicant and City of Elgin. GENERAL INFORMATION Requested Action: Map Amendment Final Plat Approval Current Zoning: CF Community Facility District RC3 Residence Conservation District Historic Preservation District Proposed Zoning: PRC Planned Residence Conservation District Historic Preservation District Intended Use: Detached Single Family Residences Property Location: 111 North Charming Street, 468 and 472 Division Street Applicant: Channing Square, LLC. Owner: City of Elgin Staff Coordinator: Sarosh Saher, Urban Design &Preservation Specialist LIST OF EXHIBITS A. Location Map (see attached) B. Zoning Map (see attached) C. Parcel Map (see attached) EXHIBIT A Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 D. Aerial Map (see attached) E. Environmental Map (see attached) F. Site Photos (see attached) G. Statement of Purpose and Development Plan (see enclosed) H. Draft PRC ordinance (see enclosed) I. Related Correspondence (see enclosed) BACKGROUND An application has been filed by Channing Square,LLC.,requesting approval of a map amendment from CF Community Facility District and RC3 Residence Conservation District to PRC Planned Residence Conservation District, and final plat approval. The property is located at 111 North Channing Street, 468 and 472 Division Street. rib The subject property is currently vacant. The applicant is proposing to rezone and subdivide the approximately 2.98 acre site to allow for its development as a residential subdivision to be known as Charming Square. The development will comprise of 13 single family lots ranging in size from 4,747 square feet to 9,169 square feet and an average lot size of 6,444 square feet. The subject property is located within the Elgin Historic District designated in 1981 which requires that all new construction, alteration and demolition conform to the Elgin Design Guidelines for Landmark and Historic Districts. GENERAL FINDINGS The Community Development Group has made the following findings concerning the standards for planned developments: A. Site Characteristics Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning district with respect to its size, shape, significant natural features (including topography, watercourse and vegetation), and existing improvements. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to the site characteristics standard. The subject property contains approximately 2.98 acres and is located at the northeast corner of North Charming and Division Streets. The entire property is currently unimproved,with the exception of the lot on the southeast portion which contains a single family residence.A 2 Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 concrete retaining wall runs along the west lot line of the house with a row of trees adjacent to it. The house, retaining wall and trees are proposed to be removed to allow for the development of the site. Topography on the site ranges from a high point of 780 feet near at the southeast corner of the property,and a low of 760 feet at the southwest corner of the site, for a maximum relief of 20 feet. B. Sewer and Water Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning district with respect to the availability of adequate municipal water, wastewater treatment, and storm water control facilities. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to the sewer and water standard. The applicant intends to connect to municipal sanitary sewer and water mains that are currently present at the subject property. Stormwater management will conform with the Elgin and Kane County stormwater management ordinances. C. Traffic and Parking Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning district with respect to the provision of safe and efficient on-site and off-site vehicular circulation designed to minimize traffic congestion. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to the traffic and parking standard. The subject property has frontage along North Charming Street and Division Street,both of which are local streets serving the residential areas on the east side of Elgin. Primary access to the property will be provided at North Charming Street and Division Street. Additional access will be provided through a private alley that extends to North Street which runs approximately 150 feet north of the subject property. The property at 472 Division Street located immediately east of the subject property maintains a vehicular cross access easement through the subject property. Access to the property will continue to be provided after development of the site. Parking on the property will be provided within garages that are proposed to be located at the rear of each lot from the private alleys that are proposed to run along the rear or side of each lot.Two lots will have access from driveways located at the street.A total of 9 of 13 lots will comply with the off street parking requirements. D. Zoning History Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning district with respect to the length of time the property has remained undeveloped or unused in its current zoning district. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to the length of time the property has remained undeveloped or unused in its current zoning district. 3 Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 The subject property has been zoned as follows for the years listed: 1927 B Residential District 1950 C Residential District 1960 D Commercial District C Residential District 1962 B1 Retail Business District R4 General Residence District 1992 B1 Retail Business District R4 General Residence District Present CF Community facility District RC3 Residence Conservation District HP Historic Preservation District The subject property was added to the City of Elgin as part of the Edward H. Hotchkiss Addition in 1854 and was improved with a single family home for Richard N. and Ellen Botsford. The property was rezoned to D Commercial District in 1961 to allow for the construction of the Elgin YMCA Building. The YMCA building was demolished in 2006 following acquisition of the property by the City of Elgin. E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning district with respect to consistency and compatibility with surrounding land use and zoning. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to consistency and compatibility with surrounding land use and zoning. The subject property is located in the RC3 Residence Conservation District,which contains single family and multiple family dwellings. F. Trend of Development Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning district with respect to consistency with an existing pattern of development or an identifiable trend of development in the area. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to consistency with an existing pattern of development or an identifiable trend within the area. The subject property is located within a mature residential neighborhood. Additionally,the neighborhood is designated as an Historic Preservation District. G. Planned Development Districts Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning district with respect to conformance to the provisions for the purpose and intent, and the location and size of a zoning district. The purpose of the PRC Planned Residence Conservation District is to conserve the urban 4 Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 residential environment of planned developments granted prior to the effective date of this title. A PRC Planned Residence Conservation District should be located only if the subject property to be mapped adjoins any existing residence conservation district along the entire length of at least two(2)of its sides encompassing the entire lengths of northerly,southerly, westerly or easterly property lines. The amount of land necessary to constitute a separate PRC zoning district exclusive of rights of way,but including adjoining land or land directly opposite a right of way shall not be less than two acres. No departure from the required minimum size of a PRC Planned Residence Conservation District shall be granted by the City Council. The purpose of the HP Historic Preservation District is to promote and to facilitate the provisions of Title 20, Designation and Preservation of Historically and Architecturally Significant Property. The HP zoning district is an overlay zoning district,and accordingly,the property located within such a district shall also be subject to the regulations of the underlying zoning district in which it is located. In general, the purpose and intent of the provision for planned developments is to accommodate unique development situations. For planned development districts, the planned development should demonstrate the following characteristics: 1. An opportunity to realize a development of demonstrated need with respect to the types of environment available to the public that would not be possible under the strict application of the other chapters of this title. 2. A creative approach to the use of land and related improvements resulting in better design and construction of aesthetic amenities. 3. The preservation of significant natural features including topography,watercourses, wetlands, and vegetation. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to conformance to the provision for the purpose and intent, and the location and size of a PRC Planned Residence Conservation District. The layout of the subdivision will be such that the orientation of the homes to be built on the lots along North Channing and Division Streets will reflect the character of the existing lots across the street.A 12,555 square foot private park is proposed to be located at the southwest corner of the site. The park will be improved with formal landscaping, an ornamental fence and a pavilion for the use of the residents of the subdivision. The single family homes proposed for the subdivision comprise of three different plan concepts consisting of three elevations each for a total of nine elevations. The elevations have been designed using architectural features, elements and textures that are prevalent in the Elgin Historic District and older established neighborhoods of the community. Significant features of the homes include ample porches on the front or wrapped around to 5 Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 the side, gable or hipped roofs, externally located chimneys constructed in brick, bay windows on primary elevations,and architectural features such as ornamental brackets in the eaves,soffits,fascia,corner boards and trim around the windows.The materials proposed to be used will consist of cement fiber board siding with composite wood trim,and ornamental features. The garages will be located towards the rear of each lot with access provided from a private alley or driveway. The structures will be designed using the same materials, textures and colors as the homes. Landscaping within the subdivision is proposed to be provided in the form of street trees located along the public rights-of-way and foundation plantings for each of the homes proposed within the development. The private park will contain landscaping in the form of artistic groupings of trees and plant material surrounding the pavilion.A row of trees will be planted to screen each of the adjacent homes from the park. A new retaining wall approximately 10 feet in height will be constructed along the southeastern boundary of the subdivision. The wall will be terraced and provided with landscape material to reduce its impact. Departures are being requested from the requirements of the zoning ordinance. H. Comprehensive Plan Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning district with respect to conformance to the goals, objectives, and policies of the official comprehensive plan. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to the Comprehensive Plan Standard. The subject property is designated as "Urban/Traditional Residential (2.1-8.7 dwelling units/acre)" on the Land Use exhibit in the Elgin Comprehensive Plan and Design Guidelines. The Urban/Traditional Residential designation is suitable for any area where urban density land use, including detached and attached single family homes, and higher density multiple family dwellings exists or is desired.These areas generally include that part of the community that developed between the 1850's and early 1960's, but are also recommended around the mixed use centers and along the transportation corridors. Appropriate locations offer neighborhood access to local,collector and arterial roads,access to water and sanitary sewer systems,and proximity to public safety services.The provision of park and open space is encouraged to provide opportunities for recreation and access to bicycle and pedestrian trail networks. Other uses allowed in this category may include neighborhood commercial centers,churches,and schools in locations deemed appropriate by the City. The density of the proposed development is 4.36 dwelling units/acre. The single family homes are proposed to be marketed at price points between $275,000 and $325,000 per home. 6 Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 I. Natural Preservation Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned development with respect to the preservation of all significant natural features including topography, watercourses, wetlands, and vegetation. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect to the Natural Preservation Standard. The subject property contains a few trees along the northern property line and along the eastern portion of the property. The applicant is proposing to incorporate the trees along the northern property line, but will replace the trees along the eastern property line with new quality landscape material. J. Internal Land Use Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned development with respect to the land uses permitted within the development being located, designed, and operated so as to exercise no undue detrimental influence on each other or on surrounding property. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect to the internal land use standard. rik No evidence has been submitted or found that the proposed planned development will be located,designed,or operated in a manner that will exercise undue detrimental influence on itself or surrounding property. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DEPARTURES AND EXCEPTIONS A planned development may be granted certain departures from the normal standards,regulations, requirements, and procedures of the Elgin Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. This planned development is proposed to be zoned PRC Planned residence Conservation District. The applicant is requesting certain departures from the normal standards,regulations,and requirements of the zoning ordinance. For the purposes of this section, the most similar zoning district is the RC3 residence Conservation District. The applicant is requesting the following departures from the PRC planned residence Conservation District Ordinance: 1. Section 19.20.635.B. Lot Area. In the RC3 district, the minimum zoning lot area per single family dwelling is 6,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing a minimum lot area of 4,727 square feet. 1.1.► 2. Section 19.20.635.C.Lot Width.In the RC3 district the minimum required lot width is 48 feet. The applicant is proposing a minimum lot width of 45 feet. 3. Section 19.20.635.E.1. Street Setbacks. In the RC3 district,the minimum required 7 Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 building setback from a street lot line is 20 feet.The applicant is proposing a building setback of 15 feet for homes located along Division Street. 4. Section 19.45.070. Required Number of Parking Stalls. In the RC3 District the minimum required number of off-street parking stalls is 1 stall per 500 square feet of floor for a requirement of 4 stalls for each of the dwelling units. The applicant is proposing a minimum of 2 stalls per dwelling unit located within garages on four lots within the subdivision. 5. Section 19.45.120.B. Size of Driveways for Dwellings: In the RC3 District, the maximum width of a driveway located within the street yard is 10 feet.The applicant is proposing a maximum driveway width of 20 feet within the street yard. 6. Section 18.24.020. Street Specifications. The minimum right-of-way width for a minor street is 60 feet and a minimum center line turning radius of 200 feet. The applicant is proposing a minimum right-of-way width of 50 feet and a minimum center line turning radius of 65 feet for the minor street designated as "Botsford Place." 7. Section 18.28.050. Streets. The minimum pavement width(back to back of curb or gutters)for minor streets is 30 feet.The applicant is proposing a minimum pavement width of 27 feet. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, UNRESOLVED ISSUES AND ALTERNATIVES The Community Development Group has developed or identified the following findings,unresolved issues and alternatives: A. Summary of Findings 1. Planned Development District Standard: The homes have been designed using architectural features, elements and textures that are prevalent in the Elgin Historic District and older established neighborhoods of the community. Significant features of the homes include ample porches on the front or wrapped around to the side,gable or hipped roofs, externally located chimneys constructed in brick, bay windows on primary elevations, and architectural features such as ornamental brackets in the eaves, soffits, fascia, corner boards and trim around the windows. The materials proposed to be used will consist of cement fiber board siding with composite wood trim and ornamental features. A 12,555 square foot private park is proposed to be located at the southwest corner of the site. The park will be improved with formal landscaping, an ornamental fence and a pavilion for the use of the residents of the subdivision. The Community Development Group finds that the proposed planned development conforms to the purpose and intent of planned developments as contemplated under Section 19.60.190A. The Community Development Group further finds that the proposed planned development conforms to the standards for 8 Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 planned developments as contemplated in Section 19.60.190A. The Community Development Group further finds that the extent to which the proposed planned development departs from the zoning and subdivision regulations otherwise applicable to the subject property as outlined in this map amendment review and the reasons therefore are deemed to be in the public interest as contemplated in Section 19.60.190A. 2. Comprehensive Plan Standard: The subject property is designated as "Urban/Traditional Residential(2.1-8.7 dwelling units/acre)"on the Land Use exhibit in the Elgin Comprehensive Plan and Design Guidelines. The Urban/Traditional Residential designation is suitable for any area where urban density land use, including detached and attached single family homes, and higher density multiple family dwellings exists or is desired. These areas generally include that part of the community that developed between the 1850's and early 1960's, but are also recommended around the mixed use centers and along the transportation corridors. The density of the proposed development is 4.36 dwelling units/acre. The single family homes are proposed to be marketed at price points between $275,000 and $325,000 per home. B. Unresolved Issues There are no unresolved issues. C. Summary of Alternatives. There are no substantive alternatives to the proposal other than an approval, denial, or approval with conditions. RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Development Commission on a motion to recommend approval of Petition 59-07, voted 2-2 thereby resulting in a recommendation of denial of said petition. The Community Development Group recommends the approval of Petition 59-07, subject to the following conditions: 1. Substantial conformance to the Statement of Purpose and Conformance,submitted by the applicant,represented by Jerome W.Pinderski,Jr.,of Pinderski&Pinderski,Ltd, undated. 2. Substantial Conformance to the Plat of Subdivision prepared by Land Surveying Services, Inc, dated October 15, 2007. 9 Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 3. Substantial conformance to the Dimensioned Site Plan prepared by BSB Design, dated August 8, 2007 and last revised on October 11, 2007. 4. Substantial conformance to the Site landscape Plans, Sheets L1.1 and L1.2,prepared by BSB Design, dated August 8, 2007 and last revised on October 11, 2007. 5. Substantial conformance to the preliminary engineering drawings prepared by Seton Engineering titled "Proposed Improvements for Channing Square, Elgin Illinois," Sheets C.1-C.12, dated June 10, 2007, and last revised on October 10, 2007. 6. Substantial conformance to the building plans and elevations,sections,and details for Concepts 1-3, and garage plans, elevations and sections, prepared by BSB Design, dated May 29, 2007, and last revised on August 17, 2007. 7. Compliance with all other applicable codes and ordinances. Respectfully Submitted, Sarosh Saher Urban Design &Preservation Specialist EXHIBITS TO FOLLOW 10 ent Gros' v�it`3 Deyew' er 1S," ComR' ` isa * —. *\ i s . g _ j !1 ) t 0"• 10f -: Sig*".ms . t"t tG „ , , s• ;Vlee i � 5 "a L, r , ., 0 so�* �t r up ` ��� M� , -; sr •$ "t di sr: 'e N � 0.0 _ ` 0 rss .i fs '_ �00 +p►[�en t - a w I. P t:tl1 .►'s�s: F't " y .' ^'s,;►' L' ='tt sir s t nt t ' ' `' \, . . . . ! t -t tL Ir xy , r >� � ;a . g * S . :.. r ____,,., � S�s . r " S - ► i 01 ,..h.„.4.1 't~C; t�!, '! a • i s„ 1 f � � � ` ' '• :' i \: � s • a �• � Nt �^S Sx '"? '. ♦ ;j � -^ , , � *' ,r-v, J ;.. y ; * ysity ,,, o rso <' ;x s .dru t S ' i 1� � ' '•"` r a 'h " l' i x, .. ��.� , 1 Y � � N r'F �" i i ` '' r �i. r ' % rNt, f ,....\...\,_„;,, � _,,10 ' *c. 1 ( +• t°. �,gly' ", C : i .10 ,rl% L 0 i . 1 4 !;! ' k 1 i ,�tpri11 0-,Y� �•,• i ,rN +y ♦ f r t . r�r J,,r of, K***0,1 t ,.y. ,•"rr��i'►o►,.�' ' '' '�N ` 1!Iv, 1 f r r %, 3,.sr is �jy"Hj'..olso \ `,, \,;,riU1G „+.ya'$'' -14 '3 i,,U�%",r �' 11..011„,►tr ik ate" V j. ='' !"'A it J..„„ ,` .•y11a .tyia iw"` tf .v. 11 i rt apa. g\fi!{ .,.....:17.:,..... •i1 A * ,4M"N c' a-� .00• .* 1111 t��}t,,� .01 i d ptaN 77yy s h is 1't '` ,:`. ••5 " 00° ' 'ty4 11111111 t1 *"• tai•.r 1. ►1tA 1 4 'S VS 40. . —� ,' , .� ►S . , tax`p. 0,00 trrt„,A VA `,a,,,, s $ tp1►59' s Si":.:.4•*0" u, \, ► ►�:+....{ t tw 1tA1t`��p b •t.. etll ,.a .,,. .a' ,..r,, y -�.,•+tea , yok. 0* M►1 ?'- • 3000., y,w,.�ri p}' pet,- ISO '•1 , ""_ t y ',, \ \, �;. "Alt ° . ‘11�1\�.'n.,� i. "'" :., •10\11. *1r w0` �1 r� l �y1NtN�t R ,.. i 1«.� „i [1 t .� �li� L 00`''' ''y11111IOW-N`� "li jt+"I° 1 i `� • � �ttl*�e (��� t�,'*�� pi yy+Q♦i lir` 'fitg�.ss:.* "i1�a0.0 .•N�{r�, > r t { , f, ',. yV\ i1� tOr-1 -1�' "" ^ 'I 1O 101 o ,,,"'.1�*s `f N °tt` ,-1, `t _r.N !t ` " -' ;,• ;,, a ., ;y 0 • 1 r ,,'�t�Al t .,- -\"j . .J1. `, `t '' M 1 s .. • i sat ~_ i t r ` n r `n" 10 — �N 9 S3 ttr 1n, • r.. . k.ra ytt'1` is,.2�-'.,,`1t'° {d� v.,, �. ,,arx`� t" 1 �;`',j •r' 11►. l t.� ; ♦r 1 a 11*^„a"' I .•rn■ -�� ✓ r tirA' �,� \ t '„- r ,_,�..y SG',„attw�":i.' 'tr' riGy{owl_ I ' tur/i�s __---" s,, t ,,C i 4 r \ '� J LPL v ,, a. r .,,,j,'u, — z, 1 o \K . "hy ..,:\. ,� y J. 11V .-� ...... ' Y A� n, r „ ` �, , s ' q tog ..w , ` n ',:5 s:\ , ,v<vr ---t.>-- --,A � #, +.aW 1 � ' f-C' 'S� Y + ♦ M�. t , t 1 'h.. ', 1 l 'r E ¢ ”% '"� v \ t � I �j -�i�' ay . ' - 1 � 1 G rm y-I r r ,�010 1 t �' ` : - • � I' r+ r 0 a to t 4• c'-'.. '�R\ ``` \:,, Ga' ."�"' .`y1t.°ii° ... '. .0 0.°-.00 ".-SSA .."'4 ., IS 04 f.V:,•,;'.; ,, . ',, .rye .- r ' is •.. Srf toast 7, A. 1 0 KK��" N ,� 'a♦ .y ,,'s,•;,,\ }.' t �„\ ••+' �•• .. sue" . i '.I,% � ,al:.. � ,+tea W. {� ,'� i .y. a6' *,y ly s,' ,,, `ti t.. „-a • s f► i, .�. .itui tr tMr►t11a'., n,t1t5,'. •111•3` '' r'�' � -ii \ ,o►�,.' sts -?... 1 `�0* N1a1 1,tt 1 tai_'�. i ♦ •�!Q� 111 ..a! r. �►n► 1v aaasr+.trarQ111p1yys 1 110 010 • y + �, st.+1 �r1N .._I.a'S�Ss" ,,,,. ,,\ ,, ,o, 0... 'r ,�`. ��' '�• 1 ♦ { Nr > s ` O �r VSI '� d S ,'sy E set 1 ° ► L ommUTI$1" eloPRS^t eP OP e�t2°� 11 0CtQbet ti. r Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 elk Elul �11u1i1ii11 1111■■■1•■ r■n■imas— hilt is i !i11111 A1N 11111111111111111111111 n1111111n ri MI !ii]II11 It IIIIIvi1Y1IIviIII1 M111 ,1~111: I I. :Ili a n '"�= 1.111111111111111111- =" 111I ..111� 11111111111111111111111111 In Ella C VIII mar.Iiiiii!iiIIIIiF: VIPil `iiikal 'mulles u11ii1C Ilum lllllii Subje ct Property ;11 P. -Im.i 1 1II ..1. MI'o.=/yrrmNm''I.. oWvillm INm-.. rME EI 1111 no �■ ��:ee �1■ �I �r. Petition 59-07 1 w.R., 1 1111_ �. �. III ... IIEj I ir• Illlllllllln �■ 1111" >. mm■1 1I■ III 1111 1 x•.•1 " '•' 111a =1r w. m Zoning Classification �� ■1 ■ 0 Residence Conservation 1 �� '� , =1U11 ,.���,� �� ■111 -'1 Q Residence Conservation 2 'II `` i EU "11�"111� E1= =1= =1 0 ra.Residence Conservation 3 iiiiui1iii 1111��'l�"• _� Planned Residence Conservation 111111 !Mid "g - M_ Im, 0 Single Family Residence 1 111,1 0 Single Family Residence 2 a" .+� rk 0 Planned Single Family Residence 2 P .11. ,1'� III!! !11 1�1 la r"1 Q Two Family Residence .11111111. rld .61 —� I�jiI Multiple Family Residence ...... �N IMI Planned Multiple Family Residence III „ — En .III 0 Residence Business MN — ti M� Ir 0 Planned Residential Business — r MN w—�7'S Neighborhood Business 11111'; 11111 - MEM ow Planned Neighborhood Business IIIIIII: 1111111 N. ..� Nam NI Area Business _ _ _ _ _ MN �= ilk Planned Area Business ■.� ▪ Center City 1 1�I11EM ■dir 111111„ �..��� Center City 2 f� amnia' uii i;: �M =�" - Planned Center City p =elm mils 111111//1 O MN ffice Research Industrial I,, .A 111111 LT I Er UU Planned Office Research Industrial P4.I�. ` �� IN General Industrial �2:f~ ` Ihr MIND MIN �� 10111■. mi Planned General Industrial ` ,,, mica ::' . gig * , �' �7 1 vim 111,1ni lug - Planned Community Facility in Community Facility ��*O 111 kflei/P1 1111= 7„ - Fox River Preservation ,�� ■� mg Planned Center City 2 C / t� ���1 11�1� 0 Planned Single Family Residence 1 ,✓ �11 11 11 0 Planned Two Family Residence \���� `0� =���limp, ma!EXHIBIT 9 Zoning Map Li� N Department of Community Development 300 0 300 BOO Feet rik October 1,2007 eTniiiirl 12 Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 r , • . , : 1 1 • . , i 1 , , i , 1 , , 1 1 , , , . , 1 1 - 1 - I . 1 , . rm Subject Property Petition 59-07 111 N Charming St 468 Division St 0613:5'2011 , -F- r I J I idi l3_5:G 12 I i _ , 1 Division __..�_.—._. i W 1 _- i , I . _—I . __ . EXHIBIT C Parcel Map n1 iV N Department of Community D evelopment 70 0 70 140 Feet October 1,2007 Innienia rk 13 Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 r , , ,... . 4 , ' -,, - Ni ! ' , ,., r rit2 - , ' , ' I- A '1, . ' j � a . MI ' - 'g .-' ire . t . �. ,.. _ ----f.1.,.- : 1 , : -` Subject Property akl � � � S Petition 59-07 '• 1 Ai ,, & ter- ti I } I INE ' '° k , ' ' I is= , . *tea c ' away- .�^ A,a . as 1 r-e Y F �. ! I '3iani. Y 1 x ° EXHIBIT D Aerial Map LA N Department of Community Development 80 0 80 160 Feet October 1,2007 rik 14 . ,• : Map Amendment Review Community Development Group Petition 59-07 October 18, 2007 , , . , • i----------i . , ,,, , ,-----ili 1 II 1 I f I 'I 1 H `} Llii I , i 1 1 --flii IL-ILI /1—H MIMI _ Hi* I , aNI _J.1,1_4' , ' ' • MN - 1 ! i • I ------ irmi 1 , !, , „ 1 h7 ; i I I I 1 1 ■ 1 III 1 . 011 111 / / ./1 I ! 1 r . t mon. i / / ___ . , 1 r ii WI .____ _ , 1 .I_ 1 -, ! -- .1 11.--- i _t_i_ii,L7 / - , , - , -1 I I i 4 a t H 1 I I me ,,_i . .• _ 1 1 - , 1 , 1 , / IT II I 1 :L---_l. I III 1 ) - .11111111111.1 ri . II I 1 I 11 -7 ---- i ---7,./ - -F-- ' i 1 aimmula • -11111111111N1 —1J-17 i / ! !I I , ' Subject Property I , I ' Petition 59-07 7- MINN ,___, i/ • J !! • ! --4 , __! MEM EMI i 1-----"- -- 1 — — i I — 1 i..-, 'L --— III I-I 1 li 1 : - h —I _ , •' ' 1 IQ I I 1 ---' J c 14 /-- • .,1 1 1111 1 1 2111 •' I-- - DI --on 1 • 1 i i 1 I 1 "-----1 - ,I I! • -----7-1 mu i F___. i H I I =mu 1 gm" MR 1 - ---1 1 1 ___ -1, I EMIL _ ...__Li. 1 1 1 I • i PH - E: ,-- - a , 1 r , i 1 1 gm i 1 ).- i_____i II El I IIII--I ' • ' I-----I rib' I III ( — TR, ii I I 1 I i Chicago 1 I I 11-1 —I I . • i -1117 I ] I ! I ' _ II , _ ,_,1 1 IIILL.Li '1 I 1 I - el- 11 I } 1 i ,1••-41.li 11 i___. 1 ,, ---,_■ 1 1 'I 11111111 i- IM ---'4 I I i 1 1 ! -1 ! ,(4 .*"4, 1 1 _ •t 1 L._.. ..._... .L....-- - - ---i 1-----11--- ---1 1H 1 1 / • •, , , -- -T------ ri • , . , ‘.,‘.1 .•., ..<:,- I NM _I ____ I , 1 HL- HI r----- ,.., 1 \ i \ ' \ 4., ' 111111 I , ,,..1 1 ,,,,,T,,,-____,,, F. , 1 \ ..._ . ,,, , ___:....,....-.. ....,.... , - , , • T , ■ I NM - I I ! I I I ' ---L-■Ar-11-1 i I I !-'-I '—,--,-,---- , ,,.-' -T-1-1, F--- 1St 1 1.11 II I _ I I I I I I 2 t;"'---, r , 1 : \ N .-.:3f- ',.--).,-,i\,.):‘• ')/ 4-'''-//-:,-- ''-- i .,' 1LH r: _1 11111Fri 111 - - 7-T- ''s, II 1 - 1--- \\c",;''',;-,: ',.,,, ,.:',,>, ",•11',.,,,,,/ / ;:'(`-.-.,, ',„ /./ 1 r _7 I NNW _ .--1 1 L i --4..,- 1 -, . --- , — ,, . , ,...-,„.,,,,:,, ,,-.-,.. ,g.--?,.. / ,.,, -: _ 1 t t , ..., \ .,.> ( .\ -<_-::!„. 't.c„. ...,'..1 .--' „/,-.---::-/ /7.7-:-... '.---- I -.-_--1 - '!, 1)‘ '-'„_---- \,, r\e"5:Y-,./ , /1.2)---„, ' :--1-14, 1 / -1 r-,-------- LAI] EXHIBIT E Environmental Map Li 100 Year ar Floodplain N mis Wetland Department of Community Development 200 0 200 400 Feet 011.4 October 1,2007 15 'OF E &A.v Memorandbm 4 City of Elgin o lawn Ili TEpEV6 VIA E-MAIL Date: October 18, 2007 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council Olufemi Folarin, City Manager From: William A. Cogley, Corporation Counsel Subject: Planned Development Ordinance for the Charming Square Redevelopment The agenda for the October 24, 2007 City Council meeting was transmitted to you earlier today with Item 0-4 being noted as "Materials to Follow". Attached is a copy of the planned development ordinance for the Charming Square redevelopment which is Item 0-4 on the Other Business agenda for next week's meeting. tik/ 1/4/ WAC mg Attachment cc: Sean R. Stegall (via e-mail w/attachment) Jerry Deering (via e-mail w/attachment) Sarosh Saher (via e-mail w/attachment) City Clerk (via e-mail w/attachment) r