G59-00 em. Ordinance No. G59-00
AN ORDINANCE
RECLASSIFYING PROPERTY IN THE
PORI PLANNED OFFICE RESEARCH INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
(2201 POINT BOULEVARD)
WHEREAS, written application has been made to reclassify
said property in the PORI Planned Office Research Industrial
District; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Development Commission has
conducted a public hearing concerning said application and has
submitted its written findings and recommendation that the
subject property be reclassified; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the findings and
recommendation of the Planning and Development Commission and
concurs in such recommendations; and
WHEREAS, the use and development of the subject property
is also governed by the terms and provisions of a certain
Annexation Agreement dated September 12 , 1990, as subsequently
amended by Amendment to Annexation Agreement dated
November 19, 1997 (collectively the "Annexation Agreement" ) .
rft. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS :
Section 1 . That Ordinance No. G26-98 entitled "An
Ordinance Reclassifying Property in the PORI Planned Office
Research Industrial District (2201 Point Boulevard) , " and
adopted on March 25, 1998 , be and is hereby repealed.
Section 2 . That Chapter 19 . 08, Section 19 . 08 . 020
entitled "Zoning District Map" of the Elgin Municipal Code, as
amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by adding
thereto the following paragraph:
The boundaries hereinafter laid out in the
' Zoning District Map ' , as amended, be and are hereby
altered by including in the PORI Planned Office
Research Industrial District, the following
described property:
LOTS 1 AND 2 IN RANDALL POINT EXECUTIVE CENTER
SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29 AND PART OF THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 32 , ALL IN TOWNSHIP 42
NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED APRIL 24,
1998 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 98K034512 AND THAT PART OF
LOT 8 IN RANDALL POINT EXECUTIVE CENTER II , BEING A
SUBDIVISION OF THAT PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 32 , TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST OF THE
THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF RECORDED MAY 21, 1999 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER
1999K051203 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS : BEGINNING AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8 ; THENCE SOUTH 00
DEGREES 39 MINUTES 39 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WEST
LINE OF SAID LOT 8, 252 . 89 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89
DEGREES 27 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST ALONG A NORTH
LINE OF SAID LOT 8, 394 . 20 FEET TO THE MOST WESTERLY
CORNER OF SAID LOT 8 , ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE ILLINOIS STATE
TOLL HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 35 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 02
SECONDS EAST ALONG A SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 8,
ALSO BEING THE SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE,
31 . 35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 52
SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 8,
199 . 87 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 04
SECONDS EAST, 50 . 14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 47
MINUTES 41 SECONDS EAST, 227 . 59 FEET: THENCE NORTH
01 DEGREE 12 MINUTES 19 SECONDS EAST, 329 . 62 FEET TO
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 8 ; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG
A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1174 . 02
FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 38 . 05 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, CONTAINING 6 . 392 ACRES MORE OR LESS, ALL
IN THE CITY OF ELGIN, DUNDEE TOWNSHIP, KANE COUNTY,
ILLINOIS (COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2201 POINT BOULEVARD) .
` Section 3 . That the City Council of the City of Elgin
hereby adopts the Findings of Fact made by the Planning and
Development Commission, and dated September 18, 2000, a copy
of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated
herein by reference, and grants the reclassification in the
PORI Planned Office Research Industrial District at 2201 Point
Boulevard in accordance with the following provisions :
A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this PORI
Planned Office Research Industrial District is
to provide hotel, conference, and restaurant
facilities and other ancillary uses to the
community and region. A PORI zoning district
is most similar to, but departs from the
standard requirements of the PORI zoning
district .
B. Supplementary Regulations . Any word or phrase
contained herein, followed by the symbol
" (SR) " , shall be subject to the definitions and
the additional interpretive requirements
provided in Chapter 19 . 90, Supplementary
Regulations, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as
amended. The exclusion of such symbol shall
r not exempt such word or phrase from the
applicable supplementary regulation.
C. General Provisions. In this PORI zoning
district, the use and development of land and
structures shall be subject to the provisions
of Chapter 19 . 05, General Provisions, of the
Elgin Municipal Code, as amended.
D. Zoning Districts - Generally. In this PORI
zoning district, the use and development of
land and structures shall be subject to the
provisions of Chapter 19 . 07, Zoning Districts,
of the Elgin Municipal Code, as amended.
E. Location and Size of District. PORI Planned
Office Research Industrial Districts shall be
located in substantial conformance to the
official comprehensive plan. The amount of
land necessary to constitute a separate PORI
District exclusive of rights of way, but
including adjoining land or land directly
opposite a right of way shall not be less than
two acres . No departure from the required
minimum size of a planned industrial district
shall be granted by city council .
F. Land Use. In this PORI zoning district, the
use and development of land and structures
eft. shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter
19 . 10 Land Use, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as
amended. In addition to the "permitted uses"
(SR) listed under (A) the ORI Office Research
Industrial District classification or (B) the
Annexation Agreement, the following enumerated
"land uses" (SR) shall be the only land uses
allowed as a "permitted use" (SR) in this PORI
district :
Lot One
1 . Drinking place (alcoholic beverages)
(5813) .
2 . Eating place (5812) .
3 . Conference facility (UNCL)
4 . Accessory coin operated amusement
establishment (7993) .
5 . Accessory physical fitness facility (7991) .
6 . Accessory swimming pool (7999) .
7 . Accessory child day care center (835) .
8 . Outdoor eating and drinking facility
(SR) (UNCL) .
9 . Membership sports and recreation club.
10 . Apparel and accessory store (56) .
11 . Florist (5992) .
r 12 . General merchandise store (5399) .
13 . Tobacco store (5993) .
14 . Barber shop/beauty shop (7231) .
Lot Two
1 . Child day care (835) .
2 . Drinking place (alcoholic beverages)
(5813) .
3 . Eating place (5812) .
4 . Conference facility (UNCL) .
5 . Outdoor eating and drinking facility
(SR) (UNCL) .
6 . Membership sports and recreation club.
7 . Apparel and accessory store (56) .
8 . Florist (5992) .
9 . General merchandise store (5399) .
10 . Tobacco store (5993) .
11 . Barber shop/beauty shop (7231) .
G. Site Design. In this PORI zoning district, the
use and development of land and structures
shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter
19 . 12 , Site Design, of the Elgin Municipal
Code, as amended, except as may be otherwise
provided in this section. In this PORI zoning
district, the use and development of land and
structures shall be subject to Section I . ,
Supplementary Conditions, of this ordinance,
and shall be in substantial conformance to the
following:
1 . Statement of Purpose and Conformance,
submitted by Scott J. Crompton, and dated
August 28, 2000 .
2 . Elevations for Randall 2-Story Office
Building prepared by Wold Architects and
Engineers (no date) .
3 . Dimensional Control & Paving Plan,
prepared by Jacob & Hefner Associates,
P.C. , and dated August 16, 2000 .
4 . Landscape Development Plan for Two-Story
Office Building, prepared by Charlene A.
Kautz (no date) .
H. Off Street Parking. In this PORI zoning
district, off street parking shall be subject
to the provisions of Chapter 19 . 45, Off Street
Parking, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as may be
amended with the following exception. The
location and design of driveways and off street
parking facilities shall be subject to
Section I , Supplementary Conditions, of this
elimk ordinance, and designed in substantial
conformance with the Dimensional Control &
Paving Plan, prepared by Jacob & Hefner
Associates, P.C. , and dated August 16 , 2000 .
I. Supplementary Conditions . The following
supplementary conditions shall also apply to
the use and development of land and structures
within this PORI zoning district :
1 . Conformance with the landscaping
requirements set forth within Section
19 . 12 . 700 C. , Vehicle Use Area Landscape
Yard, of the Elgin Zoning Ordinance, for
that lot line located along the Interstate
90 right of way.
2 . The Landscape Development Plan prepared by
Charlene A. Kautz (no date) shall be
supplemented with a number of evergreen
trees to be approved by the Development
Administrator.
3 . Conformance with the landscaping
requirements set forth within Section
19 . 12 . 700 F. , Plant Materials - Generally,
of the Elgin Zoning Ordinance .
4 . The proposed vehicle use area landscaping
located along the Point Boulevard street
lot line, as depicted within the Landscape
Development Plan, prepared by Charlene A.
Kautz (no date) , shall be extended north
along the entire length of the street lot
line for lots one and two of this PORI
zoning district as part of the development
of the subject property.
5 . Any refuse collection area shall be
located on the south side of the building
and shall be fully screened by a solid
fence constructed out of the same
materials as the building.
6 . All exterior mechanicals shall be similar
in color to the surrounding building
materials .
7 . Compliance with all other applicable codes
and ordinances .
J. Off Street Loading. In this PORI zoning
district, off street loading shall be subject
to the provisions of Chapter 19 .47, Off Street
Loading, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as may be
amended.
r K. Signs. In this PORI zoning district, signs
shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter
19 . 50, Signs, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as
may be amended.
L. Nonconforming Uses and Structures. In this
PORI zoning district, nonconforming uses and
structures shall be subject to the provisions
of Chapter 19 . 52 , Nonconforming Uses and
Structures, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as may
be amended.
M. Planned Developments. This PORI zoning
district shall be subject to the provisions of
Chapter 19 . 60, Planned Developments, of the
Elgin Municipal Code, as may be amended. A
planned development may be requested by an
individual property owner for a zoning lot
without requiring an amendment to this PORI
zoning district and without necessitating that
all other property owners authorize such an
application.
N. Conditional Uses. In this PORI zoning
district, conditional uses shall be subject to
the provisions of Chapter 19 . 65 Conditional
emk Uses, of the Elgin Municipal Code, as may be
amended. A conditional use may be requested by
an individual property owner for a zoning lot
without requiring an amendment to this PORI
zoning district and without necessitating that
all other property owners authorize such an
application.
O. Variations. Any of the requirements of this
ordinance may be varied, subject to the
provisions of Section 19 . 70, Variations, of the
Elgin Municipal Code, as may be amended. A
variation may be requested by an individual
property owner for a zoning lot without
requiring an amendment to this PORI zoning
district and without necessitating that all
other property owners authorize such an
application.
P. Appeals. Any requirement, determination, or
interpretation associated with the
administration and enforcement of the provision
of this ordinance may be appealed subject to
the provisions of Chapter 19 . 75, Appeals, of
the Elgin Municipal Code, as may be amended.
r
ri Section 4 . That this ordinance shall be in full force
and effect from and after its passage in the manner provided
by law.
Ed chock, Mayor
Presented: October 25, 2000
Passed: October 25, 2000
Omnibus Vote : Yeas 6 Nays 0
Recorded: October 26, 2000
Published:
Attest :
Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk
r
September 18,2000
FINDINGS OF FACT
Planning and Development Commission City of Elgin, Illinois
SUBJECT
Consideration ofPetition 54-00 Requesting an Amendment to a Previously Approved PORI Planned
Office Research Industrial District(Ordinance No. G26-98) to Permit the Construction of an Office
Building; Property Located at 2201 Point Boulevard,by Pancor Construction and Development, as
Applicant, and Randall Lakes Ltd. Partnership, as Owner.
BACKGROUND
Requested Action: Amendment to PORI Ordinance G26-98
Current Zoning: PORI Planned Office Research Industrial District
Intended Use: Office
rn" Property Location: 2201 Point Boulevard
Applicant: Pancor Construction and Development
Owner: Randall Lakes Ltd. Partnership
Staff Coordinator: Lauren Kieck
LIST OF EXHIBITS
A. Location Map (see attached)
B. Zoning Map (see attached)
C. Aerial Photo (see attached)
D. Statement of Purpose and Conformance, submitted by (see attached)
Scott J. Crompton, and dated August 28, 2000.
E. Development Plan for 2201 Point Boulevard (see attached)
Exhibit A
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 54-00 September 18, 2000
F. PORI Planned Office Research Industrial District Ordinance (see attached)
No. G26-98.
G. Proposed Revision to PORI Planned Office Research Industrial (see attached)
District Ordinance, prepared by the Community Development Group.
BACKGROUND
An application has been filed by Randall Lakes Ltd. Partnership requesting an amendment to a
previously approved planned development for Lots 1 and 2 of the Randall Point Executive Center
subdivision. The subject property is located at 2201 Point Boulevard (reference Exhibits A, B, C,
and D).
The applicant proposes to develop the subject property with a 60,000 square foot two-story office
building. The previously approved planned development ordinance requires the subject property to
be developed with a hotel according to a specific site plan and building elevation. The applicant
would now like to develop the site with an office building similar to those currently existing within
the Randall Point Executive Center Subdivision. Accordingly, the applicant is requesting approval
of the modified plan (reference Exhibits E, F and G).
FINDINGS ,
After due notice, as required by law, the Planning and Development Commission held a public
hearing in consideration of Petition 54-00 on September 18, 2000. The applicant testified at the
public hearing and presented documentary evidence in support of the application. No objectors
appeared at the hearing. No written correspondence has been submitted. The Community
Development Group submitted a Conditional Use Review dated September 9, 2000.
The Planning and Development Commission has made the following findings concerning the
standards for planned developments:
A. Site Characteristics Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
zoning district with respect to its size, shape, significant natural features (including
topography, watercourse and vegetation), and existing improvements.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to the
site characteristics standard.
The subject property is an irregularly shaped parcel containing 6.392 acres of land. The site
is currently undeveloped with no significant natural features.
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 54-00 September 18, 2000
B. Sewer and Water Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning
district with respect to the availability of adequate municipal water, wastewater treatment,
and storm water control facilities.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to the
sewer and water standard.
The subject property will be served by municipal water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater
control services.
C. Traffic and Parking Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
zoning district with respect to the provision of safe and efficient on-site and off-site vehicular
circulation designed to minimize traffic congestion.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to the
traffic and parking standard.
The subject property is located on Point Boulevard. Point Boulevard is a local street serving
Randall Point Executive Center. Off street parking will be provided in conformance with
the Off Street Parking Ordinance.
D. Zoning History Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning
district with respect to the length of time the property has remained undeveloped or unused
in its current zoning district.
Findings. The subject property may be suitable for the intended zoning district with respect
to the length of time the property has remained undeveloped or unused in its current zoning
district. The subject property has been zoned as follows for the years listed:
1927 Out of City
1950 Out of City
1960 Out of City
1962 Out of City
1992 Out of City
Present ORI Office Research Industrial District
PORI Planned Office Research Industrial District
The subject property was annexed in 1990 and zoned M-2 General Manufacturing District.
In 1998,the subject property was rezoned to PORI District,subject to a specific development
plan and building elevation. The approved plan provided for the development of a hotel on
the subject property.
-3-
Findings of Fact Planning arid Development Commission
Petition 54-00 September 18, 2000
E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Standard. The suitability of the subject property for
the intended zoning district with respect to consistency and compatibility with surrounding
land use and zoning.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to
consistency and compatibility with surrounding land use and zoning.
The subject property is located within the Randall Point Executive Center subdivision.
Further north of Randall Point Executive Center is a residential subdivision located within
Sleepy Hollow. Directly south of the subject property is the Interstate 90 right of way.
F. Trend of Development Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
zoning district with respect to consistency with an existing pattern of development or an
identifiable trend of development in the area.
Findings.The subject is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to consistency
with an existing pattern of development or an identifiable trend within the area.
The subject property is located within the Randall Road Corridor. This area is developing
with office, research and industrial land uses.
G. Zoning District Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended zoning
district with respect to conformance to the provisions for the purpose and intent, and the
location and size of a zoning district.
The purpose and intent of the PORI Planned Office Research Industrial District is to provide
a planned industrial environment that fosters a sense of place and destination within a
coordinated campus or park setting, subject to the provisions of Chapter 19.60, Planned
Developments. A PORI zoning district is most similar to, but departs from, the standard
requirements of the ORI zoning district.
The purpose and intent ofthe provision for planned developments is to accommodate unique
development situations. For planned development districts,the planned development should
demonstrate the following characteristics:
1. An opportunity to realize a development of demonstrated need with respect to the
types of environment available to the public that would not be possible under the
strict application of the other chapters of this title.
2. A creative approach to the use of land and related improvements resulting in better
design and construction of aesthetic amenities.
-4-
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 54-00 September 18, 2000
3. The preservation of significant natural features including topography,watercourses,
wetlands, and vegetation.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to
conformance to the provision for the purpose and intent, and the location and size of a PORI
Planned Office Research Industrial District.
The proposed amendment to the existing planned development will provide a planned
industrial environment that fosters a sense of place and destination within a coordinated
campus or park setting, and meets a demonstrated need with respect to the types of
environment available to the public.
H. Comprehensive Plan Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
zoning district with respect to conformance to the goals, objectives, and policies of the
official comprehensive plan.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended zoning district with respect to the
Comprehensive Plan Standard.
The Northwest Area Plan,an amendment to the Official Comprehensive Plan,designates the
subject property as "office, research, industrial."
Natural Preservation Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
planned development with respect to the preservation of all significant natural features
including topography, watercourses, wetlands, and vegetation.
Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with
respect to the Natural Preservation Standard.
There are no significant natural features present at the subject property worthy of
• preservation.
J. Internal Land Use Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended
planned development with respect to the land uses permitted within the development being
located, designed, and operated so as to exercise no undue detrimental influence on each
other or on surrounding property.
Finding. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect
to the internal land use standard.
r
-5-
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 54-00 September 18, 2000
r
No evidence has been submitted or found that the proposed planned development will be
located, designed,or operated in a manner that will exercise undue detrimental influence on
itself or surrounding property.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DEPARTURES AND EXCEPTIONS
A planned development may be granted certain departures from the normal standards, regulations,
requirements, and procedures of the zoning ordinance. For the purposes of this section, the most
similar zoning district is the ORI Office Research Industrial District. The applicant is requesting
departures from the zoning ordinance as follow:
Section 19.40.135 (E., 2., a.) - Vehicle Use Area Street Setbacks. In the ORI Office Research
Industrial District, the required vehicle use area setback from a street lot line is 37 feet. The
applicant is proposing a 14 foot vehicle use area setback from Point Boulevard,and a 5 foot setback
from the Interstate 90 right of way. These same departures were approved for the current planned
development.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, UNRESOLVED ISSUES, AND ALTERNATIVES
The Planning and Development Commission has developed or identified the following findings,
unresolved issues, and alternatives:
A. Summary of Findings.
1. Trend of Development. The subject property is located within the Randall Road
Corridor. This area is developing with office, research and industrial land uses.
2. Zoning District. The proposed site was previously approved for a 115,000 square
foot hotel. If approved, the proposed amendment will result in the development of
the site with a 60,000 square foot two-story office building.
The proposed amendment to the existing planned development will provide a
planned industrial environment that fosters a sense of place and destination within
a coordinated campus or park setting, and meets a demonstrated need with respect
to the types of environment available to the public.
3. Internal Land Use. No evidence has been submitted or found that the proposed
planned development will be located, designed, or operated in a manner that will
exercise undue detrimental influence on itself or surrounding property.
r
-6-
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 54-00 September 18, 2000
r
B. Summary of Unresolved Issues.
There are no unresolved issues.
C. Summary of Alternatives.
Other than an approval, a denial, or an approval with some combination of conditions,there
are no substantive alternatives.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Development Commission hereby recommends the approval of Petition 54-00.
On a motion to recommend approval of Petition 54-00,subject to the following conditions,the vote
was (6) yes and(0) no:
1. Substantial conformance to the Statement of Purpose and Conformance, submitted
by Scott J. Crompton, and dated August 28, 2000.
elk 2. Substantial conformance to the Elevations for Randall 2-Story Office Building
prepared by Wold Architects and Engineers (no date).
3. Revisions to the Dimensional Control &Paving Plan and Landscape Development
Plan to provide the minimum required vehicle use area screening along the Interstate
90 right of way. The proposed revisions shall be subject to approval by the
Community Development Group.
4. The landscaping plans shall be revised to provide a substantially similar amount of
evergreen trees as had been provided within the previously approved Landscape Plan
for Four Points Hotel, prepared by Charlene A. Kautz (2/9/98). The•proposed
revisions shall be subject to approval by the Community Development Group.
5. All proposed deciduous trees shall be a minimum of 3 inches in diameter and 10 feet
in height. All proposed coniferous trees shall be a minimum of 6 feet in height. The
proposed landscaping plan shall be revised accordingly.
r
-7-
Findings of Fact Planning and Development Commission
Petition 54-00 September 18, 2000
It
6. The proposed street lot line vehicle use are landscaping shall be extended further
north along the entire length of site's street lot line. The proposed landscaping plan
shall be revised accordingly and shall be subject to approval by the Community
Development Group.
7. Any refuse collection area shall be located on the south side of the building and shall
be fully screened by a solid fence constructed out of the same materials as the
building.
8. All exterior mechanicals shall be similar in color to the surrounding building
materials.
9. Substantial conformance to the revised Dimensional Control&Paving Plan prepared
by Jacob & Heftier Associates, and the revised Landscape Development Plan
prepared by Charlene A. Kautz.
10. Compliance with all other applicable codes and ordinances.
Therefore, the motion to recommend approval of Petition 54-00 was adopted. . (...1\
r George olf, Chairman
Planning and Development Commission
1 i L _ _�
AI
en Kieck, Secretary
Planning and Development Commission
r .
.
-8- -
Higgins Rd
Dundee Rd I
SUBJECT PROPERTY o!0
PETITION 54-00 II t.)1
Z!
\ } / Y V
_.-4.
° / ® 1
Q
90! 31
\�_ \ m cocky F•d•
0
`AI r
a I
4. R
•O• ri '�� Northwest Tollway
f Sh°e Factory Rd
1
0 i ICongdon Ave b i c
H
�'%n y Si - t Summit St o
r Golf Ad ED
`o i
Highla,,d Ave l — • Bode Rd
Pi W Chicago St `a
�` �� Catkin p' � Ch/%o
L'/
m ¢b
Sr .
_ /a`sr " s� br9
in 1
Y in 1111 U.S. 20 Bypass ` l �` 9 ?ark a
A By City Blvd
``
0
U
1 Q• �
/7 �� l rte• a St
CD ,6 Bowes Ad �a�� a ° o
Kenyon R•V •I
ID
c7 c
c7 l a
9~ Z
Hopps Rd f7.7 •4.'.)c vv Bartlett Rd
Middle St d,u
n
a°^ .1 —-— - - coo;co_-— --
_ D(PAGE CC.
y u� • —
a I o
'Stems Rd
LOCATION MAP / EXHIBIT A
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
CITY OF ELGIN NI..,_,,..,„
r :,,- „,..„--
,,..
I .7UUUIC LIUU
Porkwas,
).'
25 0
rk FYI
I me
I • Hickory
Hotlow
'r.
__________.,„.............N....,
I 9'%
�0, ` 1 ;
Rd �_
0 4.Miii
i II
v
ORI
OR! b
• SUBJECT PROPERTY
a PETITION 54-00 ••
ellik
3
V o N
v.
Fox---_.Ln.
T -
ORI
OUT
IORI 4 Holmes Rd
v I
ZONING MAP / EXHIBIT B
400 0 aoo DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
' CITY OF ELGIN
SCALE IN FEET
(scale is approximate)
LEGEND
RESIDENCE DISTRICTS BUSINESS DICTI2ICTS INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS
• SFRI SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 1 FIB RESIDENCE BUSINESS OR1 OFFICE RESEARCH INDUSTRIAL
SFR2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 2 NB NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS GI GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
TFR TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE AB AREA BUSINESS Cl COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
MFR MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE CC1 CENTER CITY 1 PORT PLANNED OFFICE RESEARCH
PSFR1 PLANNED SINGLE FAMLY RESIDENCE 1 Cc2 CENTER CITY 2 INDUSTRIAL PSFR2 PLANNED SINGLE FAMLY RESIDENCE 2 PRB PLANNED RESIDENCE BUSINESS PG PLANNED GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
/ .��_, PTFR PLANNED TWO FAMILY RESIDENCE PNB PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS
.J' j?`'� PMFR PLANNED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENCE PAS PLANNED AREA BUSINESS CONSERVATION DISTRICTS
-, PCC PLANNED CENTER CITY RCI RESIDENCE CONSERVATION 1
' • COMMUNITY FACILITY DISTRICTS RC2 RESIDENCE CONSERVATION 2
CF COMMUNITY FACILITY PRESERVATION DISTRICTS RC3 RESIDENCE CONSERVATION 3
PCF PLANNED COMMUNITY FACILITY HP HISTORIC PRESERVATION PRC PLANNED RESIDENCE
FRP FOX RIVER PRESERVATION CONSERVATION
is ,-,.r _ ,r ? .tV ,
• I' . fr.,'•‘1 1. ,i
d `
9 is~:^4 ♦ e' ]♦ .I- 6.,,,.,-..i.... ,.. kr' q
irk
'Q f � a -S 94'r • _ ii'Jf \/t 5.4.+C ..��y:i? istV-.L S t.• 404
z'*.r �, a? °�. q .. - yt +,y r f "`. / , i r pia`►
.. • M/ : i} -44 w' `o `� It ,i,Y••• +''` .`;° �j' _Iv
i j kl'' . ,fin .a���• � • -ro' '�� r In7 4 "a-,
-1,.'••,-;
_!.. �7~ ` G - . k .± a`
3.
illt s V V f y �� s 2i! wl p+ l r i� :�"r• '+ " 6 rrI › i ' -t 7 Yy�c` Y._ P �p ' t"---':-.,:,.%**
M .t r , tit e . °‘ w , 3 N, Itit
. eaE` + s:- i 'L.-N.,-_,,,,,_,..•14 w+•; y� ') a' t
• .[ -r i • 7L4 • C y `". TI } - I 1T 3 � L' rl� , ` a : � �:• i$
�}. • •� r. WS "rte ��t' w' 1 W P ,..4;7. !1.-.,.•.:.-,*: ± y .t . . ,--.7"---7.:::------T----;---.7:4, r iz a+> V,5.o-si r�{ l-kr y-r; +
.1 $ ' � . ,'' _ mot` VI 11',1 }•.4bry Y �kr s� =i �•r.!: .sr .. S,y ._ ..•\ ••• '4y. �-j r ? � ' ,..\:,,,x,,i y: � ' r 'r .". .3' r -T , w .. yi. , , - ' ' ..Vi % �1 'e , r * } t � .. t ' t t .it't"'4 ? '► fi . '. y1k .} 'i A :A # =. ... •; 's . ,,■y 1' ;, '41-, 1,r s" I� ; 1 v ...1-;--yi.y„ r -,AP. T"'.., "'V.rs •4+} j
',; .. 1 :ice,•` '"El -- 1 ',,Et?' r ,s �. a. b ,
.•z� u- k•�roi.i .ali �*ti� -'. , ;�+. ' a f e t + t 17.-A-+� t'Y 3w CV.
i v t, ma , ;yy. _k 4�� ,, ..'�: ,,,, """...,�,+, ♦ +Iy�,y" s^a - �.79 ,•i�;S: Y-I. r• ..
• a .'Y+ � 4 ,it ^~ -,- ..`.,..sv, fir.. „'G c -i+•s .-1.- t:-,- '-4,1::.• . .
a .. ., r f- ,a n. T y 'c. ,r - .-f ,*siu"63i i °Y..'`L}.t. ' * 'T11j„
k rL ,r k a , 3y� �4S r *�j `4N Y
"� .'., ..:t.--• -.,` -. .� NT„. ', ...,.,.r-y.n`'7z`aai - A y iir3 X°!,4,47/1 `art .,,SI ' � E
"..i ` .----K 1;1 -- was .... - •'It. ,4',,-'-:-,:4,^y.Ry, ; i! „�
' k-*sue° t- . i Ali 4 i_;, 1 k<;
_ �_ - ,. ��� '�- w..-...47....-"' wig
`"`+w,4w .4 �y'•lR `x3-- 5. t'S ' *, •. '� '4 TK�1: f `- _ .. {1
t , .,.+_ ' . . std ' # Sri' �. `
1 . .- mo t ', ,;�4 .•. �S.< ff iy ,1
., i_ ,MI ,,, , ?, `, y,.}� •*s "�i ,-"5.. _;,,,! .Sv Y+ <�a*' , t Yi,','7a .. sit ...r• 4
t ±1 ` •` r.-.e+-._,•.- . .,TT:r/f(r_.a. '- r t ' _.y'# e,-
�.• }
i
''- - am .. +r-?4 Y , j
'; � '7 "+. w _ � �� 5 i �; a :, Vif r S UB 5A"0 0 ACN R y ' '4' 1 , r , �i "`._ .''.• ; �e` _ ` . .h r„! ` *�. � 4�/ -- ! .
T P
1 / '7�� � /f!, r Y C r r •"rt l,°P .f-r1. : � • 1 l ) / �(' f . C � ` -r 1 Tt0 .
J _ M a "1 t! j. ".,:,
f, » «.r 1. I.rT ,�\'f :Y;1: ' - t; �. . _ i we�,f.' � w
Y' "I's 2 Yrr x 1 i J v�M y �'• • - 60+ 3 00
a a. 3p0
Q ,T EXHlei C
r
AERIAL pHQ