11-188 Resolution No. 11-188
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A FACADE IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH MICHAEL BUTIRRO
(64 S. Grove Avenue)
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN,ILLINOIS,that
Sean R. Stegall,City Manager,and Kimberly A. Dewis,City Clerk,be and are hereby authorized and
directed to execute a facade improvement program agreement on behalf of the City of Elgin with
Michael Butirro for the property commonly known as 64 S. Grove Avenue, a copy of which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference.
s/ David J. Kaptain
David J. Kaptain, Mayor
Presented: November 16, 2011
Adopted: November 16, 2011
Omnibus Vote: Yeas: 7 Nays: 0
Attest:
s/Kimberly Dewis
Kimberly Dewis, City Clerk
a
CITY OF ELGIN
FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT
64 South Grove Avenue
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 16th day of V t 2011,
by and between the City of Elgin,Illinois,a municipal corporation(hereinafter referred to as"City"),
and 11 " (hereinafter referred to as"Owner").
WHEREAS, the City has established a facade improvement program whereby owners of
property or businesses located within the center city district and specified nearby areas(hereinafter
referred to as"Rehabilitation Areas")who complete facade improvements may receive a grant from
the City for a portion of the cost thereof(hereinafter referred to as the"City Facade Improvement
Program');and
WHEREAS, the purposes of the City Facade Improvement Program are`to control and
prevent blight, dilapidation and deterioration of the Rehabilitation Areas, to encourage further
investment and redevelopment in the Rehabilitation Areas and to increase property values within the
Rehabilitation Areas;and
WHEREAS, the Owner is the owner of the subject commercial building(s) and of the
property commonly known as 0�a Came Avenue,Elgin,Illinois(hereinafter referred to as the
"Subject Property");and
WHEREAS,the Subject Property is located within the Rehabilitation Areas identified in the
City Facade Improvement Program;and
WHEREAS,the City of Elgin is a home rule unit and may exercise any power and perform
any function pertaining to its governmental affairs; and
WHEREAS,the City Facade Improvement Program,which will control and prevent blight,
dilapidation and deterioration of the Rehabilitation Areas, encourage further investment and
redevelopment within the Rehabilitation Areas and increase property values within the Rehabilitation
Areas, are matters pertaining to the governmental affairs of the City;and
WHEREAS, Owner has made application to the City to participate in the City Facade
Improvement Program for the Subject Property,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained
herein,the sufficiency of which is hereby mutually acknowledged,the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows:
Section 1. The above recitals are incorporated into and made a part of this agreement. The
total approved project costs for the facade improvements for the structure(s)on the Subject Property
shall be $Omo , as set forth in Attachment A attached hereto made a part hereof(such total
approved project costs for facade improvements are hereinafter referred to as"Eligible Costs"and
r •
such structure(s)is hereinafter referred to as the"Structure"). The City shall pay the Owner a sum
not to exceed $21;913, being thirty-five percent (35 1/o) of the total Eligible Costs, for facade
improvements to the structure approved pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The project
shall be confined to approved improvements made to that part of the Structure visible from any
public right-of-way. All parties hereto agree that all payments from the City provided for herein
shall be made to Owner,who shall provide the City with a full release concurrently with receipt.
Section 2. Eligible Costs shall include labor,material and equipment costs,and such other
costs as may be reasonably necessary for the execution and completion of the facade improvement
hereby provided for(hereinafter referred to as the"Work'),as designated from the design drawings,
specifications,and/or scope of work as set forth in Attachment B attached hereto made a part hereof,
and approved by the Project Review Team pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 herein and
prepared by Consultant(hereinafter referred to as"Plans").
Section 3. No Work shall be undertaken or shall be considered to constitute the basis for an
Eligible Cost until the design for such Work has been submitted to and approved in writing by the
City's Project Review Team (hereinafter referred to as"Project Review Team")consisting of the
City's Historic Preservation Planner and City's Senior Planner and any other member designated on
the Project Review Team. Such design shall include,but not be limited to,a date certain by which
the Work shall be completed. In no event shall such Work be completed more than one hundred
eighty(180)days from the date ofthis Agreement without the written consent of the Project Review
Team.
Section 4. The Project Review Team shall be permitted access to Structure to periodically
review the progress of the Work. Such review shall not be in lieu of any other inspections that may
otherwise be required by law or by the City. Any and all portions of the Work which do not,in the
sole discretion of the Project Review Team, conform to the Plans or other applicable terms of this
Agreement,shall be made to conform to the Plans and other applicable terms ofthis Agreement upon
written notice of the existence of such non-conforming portions.
Section 5. Upon completion ofthe Work,and upon final inspection and written approval by
the Project Review Team and such other final inspections and approvals as may be required by law,
Owner shall submit to City:(1)an executed,notarized itemized contractor statement reflecting the
total cost of the Work and each portion thereolj including, but not limited to, the cost of labor
(whether provided by any contractor or subcontractor), materials and equipment; (2)copies of all
bids, contracts and invoices submitted, executed or incurred pursuant to the Work; and (3)
reasonable proof of payment of all costs incurred pursuant to the Work.
Section 6. City shall pay to Owner the sum provided for at Section 1 herein within thirty(30)
days of owner's compliance with the provisions of Section 5 herein. In no event shall the amount
paid to Owner exceed the amount specified in this Agreement or in the contractor statement.
Section 7. In the event Owner fails to complete the Work in accordance with the terms of
this Agreement, or otherwise breaches the terms of this Agreement, City may terminate this
Agreement upon written notice of breach and termination to Owner, and any and all financial or
-2-
3
other obligations on the part of City shall cease and become null and void. Additionally, Owner
shall refund to City all money paid to Owner by City pursuant to this agreement upon thirty(30)days
written demand. This provision shall not constitute a restriction on City to pursue any and all other
rights to which it may be entitled by law.
Section 8. Upon completion of the Work,and for a period of five(5)years thereafter,Owner
shall properly maintain the Work in its finished form,without alteration or change thereto,and shall
not enter into any agreement, or take any other steps to alter, change or remove such Work, or to
create or undertake any other Work which may constitute a deviation from the Plans,without prior
written approval from the Project Review Team in its sole discretion.
Section 9. Nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict or prohibit the Owner from
undertaking any other Work in or about the subject premises that is unrelated to the facade
improvement provided for in this Agreement.
Section 10. This Agreement shall be binding upon City and its successors,and upon Owner,
Owner's successors and assigns for a period of five(5)years from and after the date of completion
and approval of the Work. Owner shall provide subsequent Owner(s)of Structure with a copy of this
Agreement. This Agreement shall run with the land underlying Structure. The City may record a
memorandum of this Agreement against title to the Subject Property. Notwithstanding the
aforementioned five(5)-year period,the provisions of Sections 7, 12 and 19 herein shall survive the
expiration,completion and/or termination of this Agreement.
Section 11. If Owner does not own the underlying property for which Work is being done,
Owner warrants and represents to City that Owner has a lease at the location for which the Work is
proposed for a term of at least six (6) years. Owner further warrants and represents that he has
received authorization from all owners of the property for which Work is to be done to accept funds
under this program and to undertake the Work. Further, such owner(s) of the property for which
Work is to be done hereby acknowledges that he is aware ofthis Agreement and authorized the Work
that is to be made to the Structure. Said owner(s)of the property for which improvements are to be
made further acknowledge that as owner of the property, he is a party to this Agreement and is
bound by the provisions of this Agreement specifically,but not limited to,the provisions of Sections
8 and 10 of this Agreement. Each"Owner"signature hereto hereby warrants and represents that
there are no other entities having an ownership interest in the Structure,which have not executed this
Agreement.
Section 12. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Owner agrees to and shall indemnify,
defend and hold harmless,the City, its officials,officers,employees,agents,attorneys,boards and
commissions from and against any and all claims,suits,judgments,costs,attorneys'fees,damages or
other relief,including,but not limited to,workers'compensation claims,in any way resulting from
or arising out of the Work to be performed and/or negligent acts or omissions of the Owner in
connection herewith,including negligence or omissions of contractors,subcontractors,employees or
agents of the Owner,arising out of the performance of this Agreement and/or the Work. In the event
of any action against the City, its officers, employees, agents, attorneys, boards and commissions
covered by the foregoing duty to indemnify,defend and hold harmless,such action shall be defended
-3-
f �
3
by legal counsel ofthe City's choosing. The provisions ofthis Section shall survive any expiration,
completion and/or termination of this Agreement.
Section 13. This Agreement shall not be construed to create a partnership,joint venture or
employment relationship between the parties hereto.
Section 14, This Agreement shall be subject to and governed by the laws of the State of
Illinois. The parties hereto hereby agree that venue for any and all actions that may be brought by
each and either of them to enforce the provisions of this Agreement shall be in the Circuit Court of
Kane County,Illinois,
Section 15. The terms of this Agreement shall be severable. In the event that any of the
terms or provisions of this Agreement are deemed to be void or otherwise unenforceable for any
reason,the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Section 16. All notices, reports and documents required under this Agreement shall be in
writing and shall be mailed by first-class mail,postage prepaid,addressed as follow:
As to the City: City of Elgin
150 Dexter Court
Elgin, IL 60120-5555
Attn: Community Development Director
With a copy of any
such notices to: City of Elgin
150 Dexter Court
Elgin, IL 60120-5555
Attn: Corporation Counsel
As to the Owner: 64 South Grove Avenue
Elgin, IL 60120
Attn: Michael Butirro
Section 17. No official, director, officer, agent or employee of the City shall be charged
personally or held contractually liable under any term or provision of this Agreement or because of
their execution,approval or attempted execution of this Agreement.
Section 18. In all hiring or employment made possible or resulting from this Agreement,
there shall be no discrimination against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex,
age, race, color, creed, national origin, marital status, of the presence of any sensory, mental or
physical handicap,unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification,and this requirement
shall apply to,but not be limited to,the following:employment advertising, layoff or termination,
rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training, including apprenticeship.
Section 19. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, with the sole
-4-
( y
exception of an action to recover the monies the City has agreed to pay to the Owner pursuant to
Section 1 hereof, no action shall be commenced by the Owner against the City for monetary
damages. Owner hereby further waives any and all claims to interest on money claimed to be due
pursuant to this Agreement and waives any and all such rights to interest which it claims it may
otherwise be entitled to pursuant to law,including,but not limited to,the Local Government Prompt
Payment Act(50 ILCS 501/1,et seq.),as amended,or the Illinois Interest Act(815 ILCS 205/1,et
seq.),as amended. The parties hereto further agree that any action by the Owner arising out of this
Agreement must be filed within one(1)year ofthe date the alleged cause of action arose or the same
will be time-barred.
Section 20. No official, officer, agent, employee or attorney of the City shall be charged
personally or held contractually liable under any term or provision of this Agreement or because of
his or her execution,approval,attempted execution or enforcement of this Agreement.
Section 21. This Agreement and its attachments constitutes the entire agreement of the
parties hereto and the subject matter hereof and may not be changed, modified, discharged or
extended except by written amendment duly executed by the parties. Each party agrees that no
representations or warranties shall be binding upon the other party unless expressed in writing herein
or in a duly executed amendment hereof.
Section 22. This Agreement is and shall be deemed and construed to be a joint and collective
work product ofthe City and the Owner,and as such,this Agreement shall not be construed against
the other party,as the otherwise purported drafter of same,by any court of competent jurisdiction in
order to resolve any inconsistency, ambiguity, vagueness or conflict, if any, of the terms and
provisions contained herein.
Section 23. This Agreement and the obligations herein may not be assigned by the Owner
without the express written consent ofthe City,which consent may be withheld at the sole discretion
of the City.
Section 24. The Owner shall comply with the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act, 820 ILCS
130/0.01, et seq., including, but not limited to, paying the prevailing wage and requiring all
contractors and subcontractors to pay the prevailing wages required therein and completing all
necessary documentation and reporting requirements in connection with the Work to be performed
pursuant to this Agreement. Without limiting the foregoing the Owner and all contractors and
subcontractors rendering services under this Agreement must comply with all requirements of the
Prevailing Wage Act, including,but not limited to,all wage,notice and recordkeeping duties.
Section 25. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, it is expressly agreed
and understood that in connection with the performance of this Agreement,the Owner shall comply
with all applicable federal,state,city and other requirements of law,including,but not limited to,any
applicable requirements regarding the City Facade Improvement Program, prevailing wages,
minimum wage, workplace safety and legal status of employees. Without limiting the foregoing,
Owner hereby certifies,represents and warrants to the City that all Owner's employees and/or agents
who will be providing products and/or services with respect to this Agreement shall be legal
-5-
r ►
residents ofthe United States. Owner shall also at its expense secure all permits and licenses,pay all
charges and fees and give all notices necessary and incident to the due and lawful prosecution of the
work,and/or the products and/or services to be provided for in this Agreement. The City shall have
the right to audit any records in the possession or control of the Owner to determine Owner's
compliance with the provisions of this section. In the event the City proceeds with such an audit,the
Owner shall make available to the City the Owner's relevant records at no cost to the City. Owner
shall pay any and all costs of such audit.
Section 26. Time is of the essence of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first
appearing above.
CITY OF ELGIN ATTEST:
By: 1 =
Kean R. Stegall Kim Dewis,City Clerk
City Manager
O R:
By:
Name/print•
Property Manager
f:Uegal dept\ag mmentlacade agreement template.doc
-6-
Fagade Improvement Estimate Comparison
Masonry(tuckpointing,the replacement) $11,50.00
Electrical&Lighting
$2,624, R!Carrot Electrical',„
Doors&Windows**
$1422fi.56'CascoIndiistries „ • �x
x,r
Structure&Carpentry $15;800.00
Si nage
$2j261:60 Budget$t i�'s �'
Painting
ter;
Demolition
$1i,00,00
Waterproof,Caulk,Seal $400
Roofing(includes cornice repair and roof edging)
Architectural Services $5'170 t�eriia:Atcf►it�cts
,04 `
Contingency
qa �G
Totals $620607.10 w
r
City 35% $21,912.49 $29,524.25
Owner 65% $40,694.62 $54,830.75
**window costs at 50%of total bid
Attachment B
Scope of Work
Property Address—64 South Grove Avenue
Property owner—Michael Butirro
-8-
64 S. Grove Scope of Work
Grove(East)Fa;ade Improvements Riverside(West)Facade Improvements
• 100% wash front of building (600 psi max. • 100%wash building and remove loose paint
and non-abrasive chemicals) . Tuck point 20%of brick wall
• Repair and seal top coping • Repair and replace 15% of brick at existing
• Tuck point 100%of terra cotta glazed block deck and fire escape supports
wall second floor . 100% remove and replace stair; railing at two
• Replace and/or repair 10%terracotta block levels including fire escape
• 100%replace windows on second floor • Remove structure,roof,and existing concrete
• 100%caulk windows and storefront • Remove small mechanical decking @ first floor
• Remove metal sheeting, nails, etc. as door
required • Provide all new pre-finish metal flashing,
• Replace transom windows behind existing gutters,coping and downspouts from roof
metal sheeting • Replace three(3)doors/frames
• Replace ceiling as required for new transom • Replace two (2) small original transom
(approx. 3'-0"interior) on first and second windows
floors . Replace seven (7) windows and enlarge three
Provide new address and business signage (3)per building code
• Provide electrical for entrance lighting; • Reset three(3)window sills on second floor
replace four(4)fixtures . Replace two(2)panels for basement windows
• Replace one single store front doors /
• 100%caulk windows
sidelight and frame
• 100% remove windows, storefront and
• Install three(3)light fixtures at each entrance
wood enclosure on first floor 14 ft.high • Relocate/rework electric, cable feeds, phone
• Reuse existing doorway floor slab/ramp. lines as required
• Provide trim under first floor windows to
• Excavate approx. 3'-W west yard to original
match existing trim on second floor level for ramp
• Provide new foundation, footings and stair,
small deck and handicapped ramp
• Provide steps to second floor to replace fire
escape
PROPOSAL
J. B.Harris&Company, Inc.
570 N. Spring St.,Elgin, IL 60120
847-741-8875
Date: August 18,2011
Submitted to:
Chooch's
C/o Mike Butirro
64 S.Grove
Elgin,IL 60120
Description of services Proposed:
Rear Facade
1. Demolition of rear porch and stairs, including fire escape.
2. Erection of scaffolding and removal of exterior steel cladding.
3. Clean of paint from brick,power wash,and tuck-point 20%of fagade.
4. Replacement of 15%of brick at existing deck and fire escape supports.
5. Installation of 2nd floor fire stairs and landing.
6. Installation of small rear porch,stairs and ramp according to plans.
7. Installation of 1'`and 2°d floor windows.
8. Installation of new 6"gutter and downspout.
9. Replace 2 transom window frames.
10. Replace 4 larger window frames on I"floor.
11. Enlarge opening size of 3 windows on 2°d floor and install frames.
12. Replace 2 basement window frames.
13. Replace 3 doors and frames.
14. Caulk in all frames with color match caulk.
15. Excavate in new ramp approx. 3 feet in width.
16. Dig out and pour new piers for rear deck.
Front Facade
1. Demolition of existing front facade and disposal of all materials.
2. Erection of scaffolding and board up building.
3. Installation of new storefront window fames on I"and 2nd floors,caulk in all frames with color
match caulk.
4. Installation of new front door frame with transom.
5. Tuck-point entire front,replace 10%of terra cotta block, repair/replace 10%of terra cotta block.
6. Trim out facade according to plans.
7. Paint all necessary components.
8. Power wash front of building.
9. Repair and seal top coping.
Total Bid: $38,325.00
This is not a bearing contract.
Prices are good for 30 days after date printed on proposal and the costs for materials have not increased.Upon receipt
of signed proposal and prior to start of job a contract will be presented and deposit collected. Please call if you have any
questions.
Acceptance of Proposal: Date:
Tt C+-W� N
Fagade Improvement Estimate Comparison arre
e-
m
0
Miason (turn oInting,Me replacement)
Electrical&Lighting t +Nt w a ••'r (t1
Doors&Wfndows
Structure&Carpentry
Si age n:a; �' �« 'w n
PaInting
Y
Demolition '• �'
A
Waterproof,Caurk,Seal
Rooft {Includes comfce repair and roof edgingl
Architectural Servioes
Cont1 enc 'wr" ::,� •:;>: t '• o LO
co
Lin
Totals
City 3595
Owner 65%
1
H
Cn
O
O
W
rnnt rage 1 of 1
From: Kevin Brown(kbrown @cascoonline.com)
To: mikebutirro@att.net;
Date: Fri, August 12,20115:02:08 PM
Cc: kmatthews@cascoonline.com;nmatthews @cascoonline.com;
Subject: Storefront Quotation and Clad Window Quotation
Mike,
I have attached a drawing with the details for your storefront system.
Pricing for the system attached would be$8,200 plus tax.
This includes all metal needed to install into openings,weather-strip, sweeps, hardware, locksets,
closures, glass, and glazing material needed.
Frames would come to jobsite assembled ready to be installed into openings. Doors will be delivered
With glass installed. Frames/sidelites will not have glass installed. Glass can be installed by Casco for
an additional$2,100.00.
I will be off Monday and Tuesday but will have my cell phone if you would like to give me a call either
day or today.
I have also copied Nick Matthews and Kelly Matthews on this project so if you have questions you may
also ask them and they can also relay them to Joe or myself.
Please note anodize clad available for the rest of the wood windows as well, please let me know if you
need the upcharge for this.
Again, thank you for the opportunity and I look forward to eating at your place in the future!
Kevin Brown
Casco Industries, Inc.
Office: 847-741-9595 (x5026)
Fax: 847-741-5065
Cell: 847-652-1977
kbrown @cascoonline.com
www.cascoonline.com
This e-mail and any riles transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed.If
you are not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient,please be advised that you
have received this e-mail in error and that any use,dissemination,forwarding,printing,or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
http://us.mg205.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launch?.partner=sbc&.gx=1&.rand=00uulwud8d5p 8/13/2011
5 ' - 0 "
CE>
4 ' 0 °
O 5 ' - 6 „
OO
� /
4 ' - 0 " OO 4 ' - 0 "
DRAWING- QUOTE
METAL UNIT FRAMES AND GLASS SHOWN. PAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
INSULATED UNIT INSULATED UNIT INSULATED UNIT NON-INSULATED UNIT NON-INSULATED UNIT NON-INSULATED UNIT
1' GLASS 1' GLASS 1' GLASS 1/4' GLASS 1/4' GLASS 1/4' GLASS
4'-0' mot' �5'-0'� .!�4'-0' —� T__5'-6'� �5'-0'--1 4'-6'— {'
3'-0'
�TYP, TRANSOM
si 0/1 0
TYP. TRANSOM
q 13'-0' 0 0 13'-0' 0 0 13'-0' 0 \ 0
® Q 7'-0'
i�-3'-0' 2'-9' 1 2'-6'1 I'-3'-0'�t
NOTESi
1) DRAWING SHOWN FROM OUTSIDE OF BUSINESS,
2) ALL UNITS TO BE TEMPERED
3) FINISH TO BE CLEAR ANODIZE.
4) UNITS TO BE FABRICATED READY TO ASSEMBLE.
5) INCLUDE HEAD AND SILL RECEPTOR AS NEEDED,
6) ALL WEATHERSTRIP, SWEEPS, HINGES, AND HARDWARE
TO BE INCLUDED IN QUOTE, Cusco Industries.lne. SCALEo 1140 APPROVED BYe R✓.a n DR.j KWB
7) DOORS TO BE OUTSWING DOORS. CLlBCO 540 Division St.
8) DOOR MARKED 'A' DOES NOT NEED LOCKING South Elgin.Oliaois 00177 DATE- 08/05/11 PART N1 - MAT'Ls
HARDWARE OR A SILL,
9) DOOR MARKED 'B' NEEDS A PANIC PANEL TOLERANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, DESCRIPTION, QUOTE
EXIT HARDWARE INCLUDED. ONE PLACE .X :.030 THREE PLACE .XXX 1.005
TWO PLACE .XX t.015 ANGULAR sl/2' CUSTOMER- — DRAWING, QUOTE
Date Printed:8/1?12011 Casco Industries Job Number.00000068
'
540 Division St.
South Elgin,IL 60177
Phone:(847)741-9595
Fax:(847)741-5065
JOB NO- 00000068
DATE: 8/2/2011
PREPARED BY: Kevin Brown
DESCRIPTION: 64 S.Grove
Software by:Bid Master.Inc..4877 Wheatley's Pond Rd.Smyrna.DE 19977 Phone:(302)6536630
D300 v 5-0 1.00
Page 1 of 5
Date Printed:8/12/2011 Casco Industries Job Number:00000068
Special Unit Combination##2
Front;1st Floor
Quantity:1
e
Combo R.O. Width:80 9/16" /
Combo R.O.Height:132 9/16"
Unit Width:40"
Unit Height:96"
R.O. Width:40 1/2" //; i Casco Industries (2.5)
R.O.Height:961/2" / Label:Front;1st Floor
4 Specialty Unit,Rectangle, ark Bronze C d,Low E2 Tempered 779.24 3,116.96
4 Width:40"
4 Height:96"
4 4 9/16 in.Jamb
Unit Width:40"
Unit Height:36"
R.O. Width:40 1/2" Casco Industries (2.5)
R.O.Height:361/2" Label:Front;1st Floor
4 Specialty Unit,Rectangle,Dark Bronze Clad,Low E2 Tempered 403.87 1,615.48
4 Width:40"
4 Height:36"
4 4 9/16 in.Jamb
1 Mull Charge 221.76 221.76
D300 v 5.01.00
Page 2 of 5
Date Printed:8/12/2011 Casco Industries Job Number:00000068
Sub Total 1,404.87 4,95410
Special Unit Combination#I
Vront;2nd Floor
uantity: 1
ILA
Combo R.O. Width:126 5/8"
Combo R.O.Height:90 9/16"
Unit Width:42"
Unit Height:60"
R.O. Width:421/2" Casco Industries (2.5)
R.O.Height:601/2" Label:Front tad Floor
6 Specialty Unit,Rectangle,Dark Bronze Clad,Low E2 Tempered 57134 3,428.04
6 Width:42"
6 Height:60"
6 4 9/16 in.Jamb
'nit Width:42"
nit Height:30"
R.O. Width:42 1/2" Casco Industries (2S)
R.O.Height:301/2" Label:Front 2nd Floor
6 Specialty Unit,Rectangle,Dark Bronze Clad,Low E2 Tempered 376.44 2,258.64
6 Width:42"
6 Height:30"
6 4 9/16 in.Jamb
1 Mull Charge 369.60 369.60
Sub Total 1,31738 6,056.28
D300 v 5.01.00
Page 3 of 5
Casco Industries Job Number.00000068
Date Printed:V1212011
Clad&Prime Double Hungs Casco industries (2.5)
Pages 1-1,1-2,2-1 and 2-2 Label:Rear,1st Floor
Eli]
T- 11
Unit Width:45 3/8"
Unit Height:64 3/16"
R.O. Width:45 7/8"
R.O.Height:65"
3 CDH4028 Double Hung,Dark Bronze Clad,Low E2 305.69 917.07
3 Tempered Glass 158.62 475.86
3 Sash Operation:Tilt Latch
3 Dark Bronze Internal Aluminum 5/8"Grille 40.81 122.43
3 (coloniallites)
Coppertone Hardware(standard)
3 Dark Bronze Screens 27.72 83.16
3 4 9/16 in.Jamb
—Additional Item—
2 GRILLE 2W1H PER SASH
Sub Total 532.84 1,598.52
Clad&Prime Double Hungs Casco Industries (2.5)
Pages 1-1,1-2,2-1 and 2-2 Label:Rear;1st Floor
ffil
Unit Width:37 3/8"
Unit Height:64 3/16"
R.O. Width:37 7/8"
R.O.Height:65"
1 CDH3228 Double Hung,Dark Bronze Clad,Low E2 267.19 267.19
1 Tempered Glass 126.28 126.28
1 Sash Operation:Tilt Latch
i Dark Bronze Internal Aluminum 5/8"Grille 30.80 30.80
1 (coloniallites)
Coppertone Hardware(standard)
1 Dark Bronze Screens 24.64 24.64
1 4 9/16 in.Jamb
--Additional Item—
2 GRILLE 2WiH PER SASH
Sub Total 448.91 448.91
D300 v 5.01.00
Page 4 of 5
Date Printod:8/12/2011 Casco Industries Job Number:00000068
'
Clad&Prime Double Hungs Casco Industries (2.5)
Pages 1-1,1-2,2-1 and 2-2 Label:Rear;2nd Floor
Unit Width:413/8"
Unit Height:64 3/16"
R.O. Width:417/8"
R.O.Height:65"
3 CDH3628 Double Hung,Dark Bronze Clad,Low E2 294.91 884.73
3 Tempered Glass 141.68 425.04
3 Sash Operation:Tilt Latch
3 Dark Bronze Internal Aluminum 5/8"Grille 20.41 6123
3 Top Sash Only(colonial liter)
Coppertone Hardware(standard)
3 Dark Bronze Screens 24.64 73.92
3 4 9/16 in.Jamb
—Additional Item—
3 TOP SASH GRILLE:2W 1 H
Sub Total 481.64 1,444.92
Bid Total 14,502.83
Tax(7.5%) 1,087.71
Grand Total 15,590.54
Interior Prefinishing Options Available:
-Raw(Standard),Prime,Prime w/one coat paint(White),Clear Coat,Stain(Standard Casco Colors),Stain(Custom Color)
Ask your sales representative for a quote. Price,if shown,is net cost.Lead Time:3-5 Weeks
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ORDERS:Only written orders can be accepted.You have 48 hours from the time your order is received at
Casco to make changes.Changes made after 48 hours will incur a restocking charge.All orders are subject to a minimum$75 shipping charge
per stop. Any jobsite delivery is subject to a minimum$150 shipping charge per stop.All the above dimensions,quantities,accessories,and
pricing have been verified and accepted by the undersigned.
Accepted by Date
D300 v 5.01.00
Page 5 of 5
DIVISION OF CUSTOM ALUMINUM PRODUCTS INC.
CASCO INDUSTRIES
540 WEST DIVISION ST.
SOUTH ELGIN,IL 60177
PH:(847)741-9595 FAX:(847)741-5065 `
Sold To: Ship To:
Attn: CASHSALE-RETAIL
CASHSALE-RETAIL MIRE BUTIRRO Page: 1
64 S. GROVE AVE.
SOUTH ELGIN IL 847-754-0751 8119111
ELGIN IL 60123 11.07.53
Fax: Contact: MIRE B.
I =1 ORDER# ORDER DATE
1000. ( 64 GROVE DOORS COD 96453 6/19/11 RS Hold For Release
DESCRIPTION
#**#*rA##r#**####
QUOTE
******* C A S C 0 *******
CUSTOM "OVERSIZE" ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
DOOR, WIDE STILE AND RAIL CONST., LO-2
1" INSULATED GLASS, ALL SWEEPS AND
WEATHERSTRIPPING INCLUDED, PANIC EXIT
BAR INCLUDED WITH EXTERIOR HARDWARE,
DOOR CLOSURE INCLUDED.
1 0 1 EA 4/0 X 7/0 DOOR WITH FRAME 2,160.00 2,160.00
MASONITE EXTERIOR DOOR, 6-9/16" FJP
JAMB, OUTSWING DOOR, BRASS SPRING
LOADED HINGES, FLUSH DOOR SLAB
1 0 1 EA 3/0 X 6/8 225.00 225.00
Comments: 178.88
Order Taker: XBC Ship Via: DELIVERED
2 563.88
ww#w*w Bwail Copy *w#r##w
R J. CARROLL ELECTRICAL
628 SOUTH STREET
ELGIN IL.. (PHONE)
60123 (847)902-9047
TO DATE
Chooch's
Mike Butirro Aug.18 2011
64 South Grove Ave
Elgin IL.60120
PHONE)(847) 754-0751
JOB
Chooch's
GENERAL Mike Butirro 64 S.Grove Ave.
ESTIMATE NO. 12676
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREES TO FURNISH LABOR AND MATERIAL TO INSTALL ELECTRICAL
VURI NG AND EQUIPMENT,ON TILE PREMISES AS SPECIFIED HEREIN.THE PRICE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
AS MENTIONED HEREIN MAY BE CHANGED,IF CUSTOMERS ACCEPTANCE IS NOT IN OUR HANDS IN 30 DAYS
FROM DATE..UPON ACCEPTING,THIS PROPOSAL BECOMES A CONTRACT.THE PROPOSED WORK TO BE
DONE IS AS FOLLOWS.
WORKMEN WILL BE PROPERLY COVERED BY PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE,A INSURANCE
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE WILL BE ISSUED TO YOU UPON REQUEST,OWNERS TO CARRY FIRE
INSURANCE ON THE ABOVE WORK.
ALL WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS PROPOSAL IS TO BE EXECUTED DURING THE REGULAR
WORKING HOURS OF THE DAY,NAMELY BETWEEN 8:00 AM AND 4:30 PM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY
EXCEPTING LEGAL HOLIDAYS.
THE ACCEPTOR AGREES TO PAY AND DISCHARGE ALL COST AND ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES
THAT SHALL ARISE FROM ENFORCING THE TERMS OF THIS CONTRACT BY THE UNDERSIGNED.
INCLUDING SUCH REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES INCURRED RESULTING FROM THE NON-PAYMENT OF
THE AMOUNT HEREUNDER
THE UNDERSIGNED SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE WHATSOEVER RESULTING
FROM DELAY OR DESTRUCTION OF OR INJURY TO THE WORK OR MATERIAL DURING CONSTRUCTION LF
CAUSED BY LOCKOUT,LABOR DIFFICULTIES,FIRE,RIOT,MOB,THE ELEMENTS,EARTHQUAKE,TORNADO.
CYCLONE,LIGHTING,PUBLIC ENEMY,OR ACT OF GOD.
ADDITIONAL WORK MAY BE ORDERED BY THE CUSTOMER ANY TIME,BEFORE THE WORK IS
STARTED,AT THE UNIT PRICES NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE,ANY OTHER CHANGE FROM THE WORK AS
HEREIN DESCRIBED INVOLVING ADDITIONAL COST OF LABOR AND MATERIAL IS TO BE PAID FOR BY THE
CUSTOMER IN ADDITION TO THE CONTRACT PRICE NAMED HEREIN.AT THE PRICE AGREED UPON OR
OUR REGULAR RATES FOR THE TIME AND MATERIAL WORK.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE
WRTITEN ORDERS FOR ALL ADDITIONAL WORK,WHETHER IT BE ON A CONTRACT PRICE,UNIT PRICE.OR
TIME AND MATERIAL.BASIS.BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH SUCH EXTRA WORK PAYMENTS FOR
ADDITIONAL CONTRACTS TO THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT,SHALL BE MADE UNDER THE SAME TERMS.AND
CONDITIONED AS ARE EMBODIED IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT BE
REQUIRED TO PROCEED WITH INSTALLATION OF WORK IF THE PAYMENTS APPLYING ON SAME HAVE
BEEN MADE AS SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT.
(1)
(a) Install piping,outlet boxes and wiring,from basement area to front
above entry for sign service disconnect.
(Note) Sign circuit to be connected to 24 hour timer in basement area.
front outside lighting.
(a)install piping,outlet boxes,and wiring for,2-wall mount light fixture's l-
each side of entry.
(b)install piping,outlet boxes and wiring for 2-indirect light fixtures
(Note) Lighting Fixture's are included within the hereunder proposal amount.
Lighting fixture's shall be connected to 24 hour timer
ustall piping,outlet boxes and wiring,for 4-out door light fixture's on rear of
building.,connected to 24 hour timer.
(#�fiistall 1-2/pole intermatic 24 hour timer for out door lighting and sign.
(TERMS) 65%to be paid upon electrical rough% remaining 35 % to be paid
upon final inspection/
(note)Electrical permits are not within the hereunder proposal amount.
All Material and or that of lighting fixtures,timer,and apparatuses are included
within proposal amount
Total light fixture(9)Nine, (1)One Sign.
ACCEPTOR AGREES TO PAY Two Tbousaud_Six Hendreo—Twenty Four
—&—.00 CENTS
S 2,624.00 _&_.00 CENTS
IT IS AGREED BETWEEN PARTIES HEREIN ALL RIGHT,TITLES AND INTEREST IN AND TO THE PROPERTY
MATERIAL,EQUIPMENT AND FDCPURES INSTALLED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL REMAIN ON THE
PROPERTY OF THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS CONTRACT UNTIL PAYMENT
IN FULL HAS BEEN MADE.WHEN THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN SIGNED AND ACCEPTED,MATERIAL ORDERED
FOR THIS WORK AND CONTRACT SHALL NOT THEREFORE BE SUBJECT TO CANCELLATION.
ALL THE ABOVE WORK WELL BE DONE,IN A NEAT AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER,AND COMPLY WITH THE
RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL INSPECTION OR NATIONAL
ELECTRICAL CODE.
ACCEPTED BY
By CONTRACTOR
DATE DATE
THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT BECOME A CONTRACT UNTIL SIGNED BY THIS COMPANY
PRICES MAY CHANGE WITHIN A 30 DAY PERIOD DUE COST OF MATERIAL
� r
BUDGET SIG
NS
20 S. Spring Street
Elgin, IL 60120
647-741-6899 fax 847-741-8899 r
bsgraphics0sbcglobal.net
QUOTE
i
9/16/11
CHOOCH'S PIZZERIA i
64 S. Grove, Elgin
15" formed plastic letters installed
CHOOCH'S PIZZERIA $1,871.60
Vinyl lettering above door $355.00
Vinyl lettering on door address $35.00
Total $2,261.60
Quote good for 30 days
Dale Wisniewski
CHOOCH ' S PIZZERIA �
CHOOCH'S PIZZERIA
CHOOCH 'S PIZZERIA �
CHOOCH 'S PIZZERIA
CHOOCH'S PIZZERIA J
Letters 15" x 19. 5'
1 se
3 -----— S
Z.4 ...... ............:
pe et
69AY PteW"&
_ Tv H Aft W
\
hooch's 1 1
! i .t-4 D P I Z—f LW
i
7,77".
# 64
• iii � ��a,
i
,ROV s
- i
tss,►. nza , .: rsat9cr bo BERN4
FACADE REMODELING FOR: COLOR 11101
64 S GROVE AVE RENDERING -AR Cffi_tD=
2
ELGIN, IL 60120 s-4-11 Al T w?
�V 1�
R
PEPOIF T 10 AAAYOR& t\AEf'ABERS OF CITY COUNCIL _ u ELGIN
THE CITY IN THE SUBURBS
AGENDA ITEM:
MEETING DATE: October 26, 2011
ITEM:
Facade Improvement Project at 64 South Grove Avenue
($21,912)
OBJECTIVE:
Award grants to businesses in downtown Elgin to promote the redevelopment of exterior fa-
cades.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a facade improvement grant to the property at 64 South Grove Avenue for the resto-
ration of the exterior building facades in the amount of$21,912.
BACKGROUND
The Elgin Facade Improvement Program is designed to promote improvements to storefronts in
the city's center core area. Under the Facade Improvement Program, property owners or busi-
ness owners within the target area are eligible to apply for grants for work to improve facades
of commercial buildings that are visible from a public right-of-way. These grants are provided in
recognition of the positive impact that individual facade renovations can have on the overall
appearance and quality of their storefronts. Established in 1991, the program has been instru-
mental in providing funds for the improvement of over 50 buildings in downtown Elgin. The
program has also been used as a guide by many communities in the region such as Libertyville
and Geneva, Illinois that are in the process of promoting the revitalization of their downtown
areas.
The proposed facade improvement grant application for 64 South Grove Avenue, submitted by
the property owner Mr. Michael Butirro (Attachment B), is another example of how the city's
economic development incentives can encourage additional private investment in downtown
Elgin.
OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
Under the requirements of the Facade Improvement Program, a property owner is eligible to
receive 35 percent of the cost of eligible improvements, up to a maximum of$100,000, with an
additional $50,000 provided to high-impact projects. The minimum project cost to participate in
the program is $5,000. Improvements are recommended to be approved in advance, and each
eligible improvement will be funded only once. Architectural services are an eligible cost
funded by the program.
The property owner proposes to make approximately $63,000 in facade improvements to the
property. The scope of work covers both the front and rear facade of the building. Because the
rear facade of the building is visible from a street—Riverside Drive—it is also eligible for funding
under the program. Attachment B contains the details on the proposed scope of work and cost
estimates.
The property was also one of five projects approved by city council for a commercial energy re-
trofit grant in the amount of$40,000 to cover 50 percent of the costs of a new energy efficient
HVAC system, windows and doors, insulation and interior lighting. The project received the
second highest score of the twenty applications that were submitted. Windows and doors are
also eligible expenses under the facade improvement program, but, by utilizing the commercial
energy retrofit grant, 50 percent of these costs will be paid by federal dollars. Of the property
owner's cost, 35 percent would be covered by the facade program.
INTERESTED PERSONS CONTACTED
The Downtown Neighborhood Association (DNA) has negotiated the proposed facade im-
provement project with Mr. Michael Butirro on the city's behalf in accordance with DNA's ex-
panded responsibilities under its 2010 purchase of services agreement with the city.
DNA's Design Committee reviewed the proposal and submitted a recommendation for approval
of the project. The DNA Design Committee is a seven member committee chaired by Tom
Armstrong, former principal planner for the city, and is comprised of three architects, a graphic
designer and one representative each from the Elgin Heritage Commission and the Green Build-
ing Technology and Energy Efficiency Committee of Elgin's Sustainable Action Plan. The applica-
tion and submitted documentation was also reviewed by staff of the Community Development
Department. A site visit to the property by DNA was conducted to assess the existing condition
and configuration of the building.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
The applicant has obtained two competitive bids for each item within the proposed scope of
work (reference Attachment D). The eligible cost for the project, based on the low bids, totals
$62,607.10. At a funding rate of 35%, the city's participation would be $21,912.49.
2
BUDGET IMPACT
FUND(S) ACCOUNT(S) PROJECT#(S) AMOUNT AMOUNT
BUDGETED AVAILABLE
Riverboat 275-0000-791.78-99 079901 $21,913 $21,913
LEGAL IMPACT
If funding were to be approved, an agreement between the city and Mr. Michael Butirro, the
property owner, would be required.
ALTERNATIVES
If the council does not approve the facade improvement project, the applicant will be required
to fund 100 percent of the project himself. At this time, the applicant has indicated that the
project is viable only with the combination of federal and local program funds to offset the
costs of improvements.
NEXT STEPS
1. Staff will have the grant recipient sign a legal agreement before starting work.
2. The property owner will need to obtain the necessary building permits for the facade
work. All permits will need to be obtained prior to starting construction on the project.
3. Through the duration of the project, staff, with the help of DNA, will monitor the project
and work with the property owner to resolve any issues that arise during construction.
Major changes or elimination of certain items in the approved design plan must be ap-
proved by the city with a recommendation from DNA.
4. Upon completion of the project, copies of all bids, contracts and invoices will need to be
submitted to the city along with contactors' waivers of lien (or partial waivers of lien for
individual discrete components of work). The property owner will need to request a final
inspection on the project.
5. City staff will inspect the work for compliance with city codes and conformance with the
design plans approved for the project. A final payout of the grant amount will only be
made on completion of the final inspection and review of all out of pocket expenses.
1
3
Originators: Sarosh Saher, Senior Planner
Marc Mylott, Director Community Development Department
Final Review: Colleen Lavery, Chief Financial Officer
William A. Cogley, Corporation Counsel/Chief Development Officer
Richard G. Kozal, Assistant City Manager/Chief Operating Officer
Sean R. Stegall, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS
A. Recommendation of the DNA Design Committee
B: 64 South Grove Avenue Fagade Application
C. Eligible Scope of Work and Contractor Cost Estimates
D. Eligible Cost Comparison
E. Fagade and Interior Renovation Plans and Guidance Documents
4
' .
dowfItOV4f"'
���������� ��8�� ���or» »oo —
Memorandum neighborhood~~" " "~°" ~"" " ^=" " " » » —~ �J �� (�\ ��\��
/1c�^��)�—\/\7'\��. , ��. ^_`_~
Date: October 13, ZD11
To: 5anoshSaher,Senior Planner
Rick Knza[Assistant City Manager 2 [�oug�m� z»venue^Eiqin u 6O��o
8�� 48� 14�6^Dmvvn�ovvnE|go�zon`
From: Tonya Hudson, DNA Executive Director
DNA Design Review Committee
0e: Recommendation on fa�acle improvement grant for 64 S. Grove Avenue,Chooch's Pizzeria
Provided herein is recommendation from the Downtown Neighborhood Association's Design Review
Committee regarding afa�ade improvement grant for 64 S. Grove Avenue' the future site of[hooch's
Pizzeria.
Project Background
Brothers Daniel and Michael 8uttiro purchased the building at 64 S. Grove Avenue in April, 2011 for
$256'000 with plans to open a pizzeria on the first floor, create a single residence on the second floor
and restore the historical character of the building's front and rear facades.
The Butdnm'sare investing close to $SOC\DOO in the project, which includes the purchase and complete
exterior and interior rehabilitation of the building and the opening of the pizzeria on the first floor.The
Buttivo's selected a Downtown Elgin architecture firm, BernaArchitectn'to design the project inside and
out. Berna has worked on numerous downtown fagade projects over the past decade' including the
Hines & Aasociates building on Douglas Avenue and a handful of buildings on E. Chicago St. The owners
are working with local contractor seasoned in historic renovation,J.13. Harris' on the interior renovation
of the first and second floors.
According to the Elgin Historical Society, the building is thought to be built in the 1909 as the first movie
theater in Elgin called the Lyric Theatre. The clean,classic design and original glazed terracotta block on
the second floor showcases newer materials and a design that is not present in the surrounding
buildings from the late 1800's. The second floor of the building's fa�ade has examples of classic designs
that have been used for centuries, including the "Greek Key" trim on the windows and the "Egg and
Dart"trim along the cornice line.
Throughout the past century, the building's first floor has housed a women's clothing store, a bakery, a
pizzeria and offices. The second floor has been untouched since the early 1950s' when it appears to
have been a doctor's office and a dentist's office.
The building has sat entirely vacant and unmaintained since 2008.
It is uncertain when the storefront was covered with the large aluminum and wood panels that exist
today. DNA estimates this may have been done in the 1970s when many downtown buildings were
subjected to "modernization," especially with techniques that were inexpensive. Rather than replacing
large storefront windows, owners used other materials to close up the storefronts with minimal
windows.
Facade Improvement Grant Recommendation
Berna Architects has designed the Grove facade to restore the building's clean-lined architectural
character.The Riverside fagade will also get a facelift to match a new outdoor dining and gathering area
that will fit in well with the city's plans for the Riverside Drive Promenade.
DNA's Design Review Committee recommends that both the Grove and Riverside facades be considered
"primary" facades as they are both highly visible from the public right of way. Therefore, all facade
improvements outlined in the following scope of work would be eligible for a 35% rebate through the
program(See attached Conceptual and CAD drawings).
Facade Scope of Work
Grove(East) Facade Improvements Riverside(West) Facade Improvements
• 100% wash front of building (600 psi max. • 100%wash building and remove loose paint
and non-abrasive chemicals; see attached . Tuck point 20%of brick wall
preservation brief)
• Repair and replace 15% of brick at existing
• Repair and seal top coping deck and fire escape supports
• Tuck point 100% of terra cotta glazed block • 100% remove and replace stair; railing at two
wall second floor levels including fire escape
• Replace and/or repair 10%terracotta block . Remove structure, roof,and existing concrete
• 100% replace windows on second floor . Remove small mechanical decking @ first floor
(50% of total cost is eligible; other 50% door
covered by EECDBG)
• 100%caulk windows and storefront • Provide all new pre-finish metal flashing,
gutters, coping and downspouts from roof
• Remove metal sheeting, nails, etc. as
• Replace three(3)doors/frames
required
• Replace transom windows behind existing • Replace two (2) small original transom
o
metal sheeting (50% of total cost is eligible; windows (50% of total cost is eligible, other
other 50%covered by EECDBG) 50%covered by EECDBG)
• Replace ceiling as required for new transom • Replace seven (7) windows and enlarge three
o
(approx. T-0"interior) on first and second (3) per building code (50% of total cost is
floors eligible,other 50%covered by EECDBG)
• Provide new address and business signage
• Reset three (3) window sills on second floor
a o
(50/of total cost is eligible;other 50%covered
• Provide electrical for entrance lighting; by EECDBG)
replace four(4)fixtures • Replace two (2) panels for basement windows
• Replace one single store front doors / (50%of total cost is eligible,other 50%covered
sidelight and frame (50% of total cost is by EECDBG)
eligible,other 50%covered by EECDBG) • 100%caulk windows
• 100% remove windows, storefront and • Install three(3) light fixtures at each entrance
wood enclosure on first floor 14 ft. high . Relocate/rework electric, cable feeds, phone
• Reuse existing doorway floor slab/ramp. lines as required
• Provide "egg and dart" trim under first floor • Excavate approx. 3'-0" west yard to original
windows to match existing trim on second level for ramp
floor . Provide new foundation, footings and stair,
small deck and handicapped ramp
• Provide steps to second floor to replace fire
escape
Fa4ade Estimate Comparison
The owners gathered two competitive estimates for all eligible improvements within the scope of work
with the understanding that all work be estimated at Illinois prevailing wage rates. The completed and
signed facade application includes a statement of understanding regarding the same.
DNA recommends to city staff that city council approve $21,912.49 for this project, which is 35% of
the total eligible expenses of the lowest bid provided.
Masonry ,Y,. �
Electrical& Lighting
Doors&Windows* 6
Structure &Carpentry
M� .
Signage E 6 64?
Al
Painting
Demolition ,.
Waterproof, Caulk,Seal
k
Architectural Services
Contingency $ $
Totals
City 35%
Owner 65% $40,694.61 $54,830.75
*Indicates 50%o total estimate or windows/doors;other 50%covered by EECDBG)
f f
With this recommendation come the following conditions:
• The terra cotta tiles on the facade on Grove are to be cleaned, tuck pointed and replaced as
needed by a reputable masonry company experienced in commercial historic rehabilitation. Our
preference is Seyller's Masonry & Tuckpointing due to their experience in downtown with the
terra cotta facade on the Burritt Building and other historic facades such as the McBride
Building, the Leath Building and Fred Steffen's building which houses Villa Verone and Bangkok
House,among others.See attached preservation brief for details.
• The attached design concept and drawings for the Riverside facade are not finalized and do not
reflect the approved scope of work previously outlined. The Buttiro's are working with city staff
on ADA requirements for that exit. It is our understanding at the time of this recommendation
that the plan includes a small deck at the first level door that may or may not include a
handicapped-accessible ramp, a new wooden staircase to replace the fire escape to the second
floor apartment (per code), a poured concrete patio and an iron gate around the perimeter of
the patio. This area will serve primarily as an outdoor dining area, access to which is limited
from inside the building only. It will not serve as a second entrance to the pizzeria at this time.
However,the owners have the option to build a larger deck and create a "Riverside entrance' in
the future should they desire to capitalize on traffic from the proposed Riverside Drive
Promenade.
• The drawings also do not reflect changes requested by the committee in our meeting with the
architect for the Grove facade to continue the vertical side columns of the building from the top
of the storefront to the ground to provide a termination for the bulkhead paneling and a break
point with the remaining building facade to the north and the neighboring building to the south.
• Lastly, the quality of the materials selected is extremely important, especially in regards to the
pre-finished gray metal cladding to be used to frame the storefront.We defer to the architect to
select the appropriate quality materials.
Additionally, 64 S. Grove Avenue was one of five projects approved by city council for a grant in the
amount of $40,000 to cover 50% of the costs of a new, energy efficient HVAC system, windows and
doors, insulation and interior lighting. The project received the second highest score of the 20
applications. Windows and doors are eligible expenses under the facade improvement program. By
utilizing the commercial energy retrofit grant, 50% of these costs were paid by federal dollars. Of the
property owner's 50% of the cost, 35% may be covered by the facade program. Utilizing these two
programs in combination leaves more money in the facade budget for other improvements while also
encouraging property enhancements that are both historically sound and energy efficient.
Conclusion
In addition to the facade improvement grant, DNA is working with the owners on a combination of other
downtown grant programs that will help provide financial stability for the business and the property.
Recommendations will be submitted within the next 30 days for the Downtown Business Loan Interest
Subsidy Program (approx. $15,000 over 3 years), Grease Trap Incentive Program (max. $7,500) and
Projecting Sign Grant (max. $2,500).
The project at 64 S. Grove is an impactful example of sustainable, preservation-focused downtown
economic development utilizing city programs in tandem with federal programs such as the commercial
energy retrofit program. The project will serve as a catalyst for additional private investment along
Grove Avenue when coupled with the renovation of the Riverside Drive Promenade in the spring of
2012.
Respectfully Submitted,
DNA Design Review Committee
Tom Armstrong,Chair Tonya Hudson
Retired City Planner DNA Executive Director
David Jurina John Roberson
Architect Architect
Darlene Hulin Betsy Couture
Graphic Designer Historic Preservation Commissioner
Dave Segel John Hrivnak
Sustainability Consultant Architect
Jerry Sorenson Sarosh Saher
Designer, Preservationist City Liaison
Attachments:
1. Facade Application
2. Existing Site Photos
3. Scope of Work
4. Facade Estimate Comparison &Supporting Documents
5. Architect's Renderings& Drawings
6. Preservation Brief on Cleaning& Repairing Terra Cotta
Attachment B A4
!3- (1
DOWNTOWN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
THE CnY IN TM SUBURBS
Pre-Application: Fagade Improvement Grant Program
—C k p o c,� ' 5 ? i M I C"k OL C,
Business Name Applicant Name
Business Mailing Address(for legal correspondence) ` City/State/Zip
Business Phone Cell Phone Email
SOL4r< A.S abodf 0WieV-
Downtown Property Address Property Owner's Name(if applicant is tenant)
1, Please prioritize your goals for this project:(1=very important; 2=important, 3=not an issue)
1 Property Enhancement Business Visibility
Code Compliance ' Energy-efficient Upgrades
Other:
2. What eligible improvements do you wish to make to the exterior of the building?
Canopy/Awning &Signage
El"Windows/Doors Exterior Lighting
LT�Painting Ll Restoration of Architectural Feature(s)
`Brick Cleaning/Tuckpointing DA Compliance(ramps, handrails,etc.)
3. Please describe in detail the improvements you plan to make to the exterior of the property. Refer
to the program guidelines for more information about eligible improvements. Attach a "before"
picture for reference. Include copies of code violation reports, if applicable. Include other interior or
exterior renovation work that will be done in conjunction with the eligible fa4ade improvements.
�I t!t _.. lxC L+) j,V it 5� Cjf j t 4r1 ' (00-Cl— . --till-
j'A J Aw VI'l,I!ex- S I Y\3 4L, I Cl
(� 1t VX" Li i tt
....._.......
...
4. What is the maximum amount of private investment you plan to make in this fagade improvement
project? $ `" D 00
5. if you plan to do additional interior or exterior work in conjunction with the facade improvement
project,what is your total budget for the entire project?$ 3 5 DOD
Statement of Understanding
The applicant (undersigned) agrees to comply with the guidelines and procedures of the Facade
Improvement Program and the conceptual design and outline specifications as agreed to by the
applicant and the application review team.
The applicant understands that the applicant must submit detailed cost documentation, copies of
building permits, bids,contracts and invoices and contractor's final waivers of lien upon completion
of the approved improvements.
if utilizing this program for the purposes of building improvements and/or business development,
any work done by contractors or laborers must comply with the Illinois Prevailing Wage Act.The fol-
lowing language shall appear in any agreement between the program applicant and the city:
• bed du€�t� �retie�ri t `j�� �"
i e
MW
FApiflicant Signature Date
If the applicant is other than the owner,please complete the following:
I certify that 1, the owner of the property at (,tf authorize the
app(ic to a ply for a rebat der the Facade Improvement Program and undertak the
appr ve impr veme ts.
Property Owner Signature at
Submit this application and supporting materials to:
DNA Design Review Committee I Attn:Tonya Hudson
2 Douglas Avenue I Elgin,IL 60120
(847)488-1456 ( Fax(847)488-1449 i thudson @downtownelgin.com
[
I In I
i 14e
<
F
$ x.
e i
-v
� w
A.00
k Vil w P--t
� M
V,
s
FRONT(S. Grove Avenue) REAR(Riverside Drive)
64 S.Grove Avenue
Proposed Site"' ooch's Pizzeria '
Attachment C 1
64 S. Grove Scope of Work
Grove(East)Fa4ade Improvements Riverside(West) Facade Improvements
• 100% wash front of building (600 psi max. • 100%wash building and remove loose paint
and non-abrasive chemicals) . Tuck point 20%of brick wall
• Repair and seal top coping • Repair and replace 15% of brick at existing
• Tuck point 100% of terra cotta glazed block deck and fire escape supports
wall second floor . 100% remove and replace stair; railing at two
• Replace and/or repair 10%terracotta block levels including fire escape
• 100%replace windows on second floor • Remove structure, roof,and existing concrete
• 100%caulk windows and storefront • Remove small mechanical decking @ first floor
• Remove metal sheeting, nails, etc. as
door
required • Provide all new pre-finish metal flashing,
• Replace transom windows behind existing gutters,coping and downspouts from roof
metal sheeting • Replace three (3)doors/frames
• Replace ceiling as required for new transom • Replace two (2) small original transom
(approx. 3'-0"interior) on first and second windows
floors . Replace seven (7) windows and enlarge three
• Provide new address and business signage (3) per building code
• Provide electrical for entrance lighting; • Reset three(3)window sills on second floor
replace four(4)fixtures • Replace two(2) panels for basement windows
• Replace one single store front doors / . 100%caulk windows
sidelight and frame
• 100 remove windows, storefront and
• Install three(3) light fixtures at each entrance
wood enclosure on first floor 14 ft. high • Relocate/rework electric, cable feeds, phone
• Reuse existing doorway floor slab/ramp. lines as required
• Provide trim under first floor windows to
• Excavate approx. 3'-0" west yard to original
match existing trim on second floor level for ramp
• Provide new foundation, footings and stair,
small deck and handicapped ramp
• Provide steps to second floor to replace fire
escape
rant rage r ui c
From: Kevin Brown(kbrown @cascoonline.com)
To: cnikebutirro@att:net;
Date: Fn, August 12,20115:02:08 PM
Cc: kmatthews @cascoonline.com;rttnatthewsCa),cascoonline.corn;
Subject: Storefront Quotation and Clad Window Quotation:
Mike,
I have attached a drawing with the details.for your storefront system.
Pricing for the system attached would be$8,200 plus tax.
This includes all metal needed to install into openings,weather-strip, sweeps, hardware, locksets,
closures, glass, and glazing material needed.
Frames would come to jobsite assembled ready to be installed into openings. Doors will be delivered
with glass installed. Frames/sidelites will not have glass installed. Glass can be installed by Casco for
an additional$2,104.00.
I will be off Monday and Tuesday but will have my cell phone if you would like to give me a call either
day or today.
I have also copied Nick Matthews and Kelly Matthews on this project so if you have questions you may
also ask them and they can also relay them to Joe or myself.
Please note anodize clad available for the rest of the wood windows as well, please let me know if you
need the upcharge for this.
Again, thank you for the opportunity and t look forward to eating at your place in the future!
Kevin Brown
Casco Industries, Inc.
Office: 847-741-9595 (x5026)
Fax:-847-741-5065
Cell: 847-6521977
kbrown @cascoonline.com
www.cascoonline.com
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed.If
you are not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient,please be advised that you
have received this e-mail in error,and that any use,dissemination,forwarding,printing,or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
http:/tus.mg205.mail.yahoo.com/dc/launcli?.partner--sbc&.gx=1&.rand=00uul.vvud8d5p 8/13/2011
J
I �
„ 0 - , 0 , b
// 0 - / g
J
J
DRAWING, QUOTE
METAL UNIT FRAMES AND GLASS SHOWN, IPAGE NUMBER 1 OF 1
INSULATED UNIT INSULATED UNIT INSULATED UNIT NON-INSULATED UNIT NON-INSULATED UNIT NON-INSULATED UNIT
1' GLASS 1' GLASS 1' GLASS 1/4' GLASS 1/4' GLASS 1/4' GLASS
_ 0 0
3'-0'
TYP, TRANSOM
-4
3'-0'
TYP. TRANSOM
11'-0'
13-0' . \ o Oi 13'-0' 0 0' 13'-0' �!r i3'-o' 9i ` 0
� o
o I I l
1) DRAWING SHOWN FROM OUTSIDE Of BUSINESS,
2) ALL UNITS TO BE TEMPERED
3) FINISH TO BE CLEAR ANODIZE.
4) UNITS TO BE FABRICATED READY TO ASSEMBLE.
5) INCLUDE HEAD AND SILL RECEPTOR AS NEEDED,
6) ALL WEATHERSTRIP, SWEEPS, HINGES, AND HARDWARE
TO BE INCLUDED IN QUOTE: °°°olndr..rrro..J.,e` SCALE 1+40 APPROVED BYi S7i«a DR,' KW9
7) DOORS TO BE OUTSWING DOORS. �'tt8CC3 saa nrer.ron sz
8) DOOR MARKED 'A' DOES NOT NEED LOCKING So"rh Elgin.1711.or.60177 DATE, 08/05/11 PART k. — MAT'L
HARDWARE OR A SILL,
9) DOOR MARKED 'B' NEEDS A PANIC PANEL TOLERANCES UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED DESCRIPTIONi QUOTE
EXIT HARDWARE INCLUDED, ONE PLACE ,X $.030 THREE PLACE ,XXX 2,005
TWO PLACE .XX f.015 ANGULAR it/2'I CUSTOMERi DRAWING, QUOTE
Date,Printed-8/12f2011 Casco Industries Job Number 00000068
540 DiYision St.
South Elgin,IL 60177
Phone:(847)741-9595
Fax:(847)741-5065
JOB NO. 00000068
DATE. 8/212011
PREPARED BY: Kevin Brown
DESCRIMON: 64 S.Grove
Scftware by:Bid Master,Inc.,4877 Wheatley's Pond Rd.,Smyrna,DE 19977 PhoW.(302)6&36630
0300 v 5.01.66
Page 1 of 5
Casco Industries Job Number:00000068
Bate Printed;9/12/2011 ___..__. _._.__ ______ __ ..
Special Unit Combination#2
Front;Ist)Floor
Quantity:1
Combo R.O. Widtb:80 9/16"
Combo R.O.Height:132 9/16"
Unit Width:40" ✓X
Unit Height:96"
RO. Width:40 1/2" '- / Casco Industries (2S)
R.O.height•961/2" Label:Front;Ist Floor
le ark Bronze C d Low E2 Tempered 779.24 3,116.96
4 specialty Unit,Rectangle, � Pe
4 Width:40"
4 Height:96"
4 4 9/16 in.Jamb
Unit Width:40"
Unit Height:36"
R.O. Width. 1!4' Casco Industries (2.5)
R.O.Height:361/2" Label:Front; Ist Floor
4 Specialty Unit,Rectangle,Dark Bronze Clad,Low E2 Tempered 403.87 1,615.48
4 Width:40"
4 Height:36"
4 4 9116 in.Jamb
1 Mull Charge 221.76 221.76
1530
_0 x 5.01.00
Page 2 of 5
Date Printed:8/1212011 Casco Industries Job Number.00000068
Sub Total 1,404.87 4,954.20
pedal(fait Combination#1 _._--
vront;god Floor
uantity: 1
Combo R.O. Width:126 S/8"
Combo R.O.height:90 9/16"
Unit Width:42"
Unit Height:60"
R.O. Width:421/2" Casco Industries (2.5)
R.O.Height:601/2" Label:Front 2nd Floor
6 Specialty Unit,Rectangle,Dark Bronze Clad,Lwow E2 Tempered 571.34 3,428.04
6 Width:42"
6 Height:60"
6 4 9/16 in.Jamb
Tnit Width:42"
nit Height:30"
R.O. Width:42 1/2" Casco Industries (2S)
R.Q.Height:30 1/2" Label:Front 2nd Floor
6 Specialty Unit,Rectangle,Dark Bronze Clad,Low E2 Tempered 376.44 2,258.64
6 Width:42"
6 Height:30"
6 4 9/16 in.Jamb
1 Mull Charge 369.60 369.60
Sub Total 1,31738 6,0+6.28
-
v 5.01.00
Page 3 of 5
a3CO IndtS#1ie$
Dace Printed:&f 12/2111
Job Number;4004006$
Clad&Prime Double Rungs Casco industries (2S)
Pages 1-1,1-2,2-1 and 2.2 Label:Rear;1st Floor
Unit Width:45 3/8"
Unit Height-64 3/16"
R.O. Width:45 7/8"
R.O.Height:65"
3 CDH4028 Double Hung,Dark Bronze Clad,Low E2 305.69 917.07
3 Tempered Glass 158.62 475.86
3 Sash Operation:Tilt Latch
3 Dark Bronze Internal Aluminum 5/8"Grille 40.81 122.43
3 (coloniallites)
Coppertone Hardware(standard)
3 Dark Bronze Screens 27.72 83.16
3 4 9/16 in_Jamb
- Additional.Item--
2 GRILLE 2W1H PER SASH
Sub Total 532.84 1,598.52
......_.._... .._.__..._..
Claid Prinie Double Hungs Casco Industries (2.5)
Pages 1-1,1-2,2-1 and.2-2 (.abet:Rear;Ist Floor
ITH
Unit Width.:37 3/8"
Unit Height;64 3/16
R.O. Width:377/8"
R.O.Heigbt:65"
1 CDH3228 Double Hung,Dark Bronze Clad,Low E2 267.19 26719
1 Tempered Glass 126.28 126.28
1 Sash Operation:Tilt Latch
1 Dark Bronze Internal Aluminum 5/8"Grille 30.80 30.80
1 (coloniallites)
Coppertone Hardware(standard)
1 Dark Bronze Screens 24.64 24.64
1 4 9/16 in.Jamb
--Additional Item-
2 GRILLE 2W1H PER SASH
Sub Total 448.91 448.91
15340 v 5.01.00
Page,4 of 5
Date Printed:8l12/201 l Casco Industries Job Number:00000068
Clad&Prime Double:Huags Casco Industries (2.5)
AMI,Pages 1-1,1-2,2-1 and`2-2 Label:Rear;2nd Floor
Eft
Ll
Unit Width:413/8"
Unit Height:64 3/16"
R-O. Width:417/8"
R.Q.Height:65"
3 CDH3628 Double Hung,Dark Bronze Clad,Low E2 294.91 884.73
3 Tempered Glass 141.68 425.04
3 Sash Operation:Tilt Latch
3 Dark Bronze Internal Aluminum 518"Grille 20.41 61.23
3 Top Sash Only(colonial liter)
Coppertone Hardware(standard)
3 Dark Bronze Screens 24.64 73.92
3 4 9 11G in.Iamb
--Additional Item—
3 TOP SASH GRILLE:2W I H
Sub Total 431.64 1,444.92
Bid Total 14,502.83
Tae(7.5%) 1,087.71
Grand Total 15,590.54
Interior Prefinishing Options Available:
-Raw(Standard),Prime,Prime w/one coat paint(White),Clear Coat,Stain(Standard Casco Colors),Stain(Custom Color)
Ask your sales representative fora.quote. Price,if shown,is net cost Lead Time:3-5 Weeks
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ORDERS:Only written orders can be accepted.You have 48 hours from the time your order is received at
Casco to make changes.Changes made after 48 hours will incur a restocking charge.All orders are subject to a minimum$75 shipping charge
per stop. Any jobsite delivery is subject to a minimum$150 shipping charge per stop.All the above dimensions,quantities,accessories,and
pricing have been verified and accepted by the undersigned.
Accepted by Date
—— ---- _ _
D300 v 5.01.00
Page 5 of 5
DIVISION OF CUSTOM ALU AI- NUMPRODUCTS INC.
CASCO INDUSTRIES
540 WEST DIVISION ST.
SOUTH ELGIN,IL 60177
PH:(847)741-5595 FAX.(847)741-5065
Sold To: Ship To:
Attn: CASHSALE-RETAIL
CASHSALE-RETAIL MIRE BUTIRRO Page: 1
64 S. GROVE AVE
SOUTH ELGIN IL 847-754-0751 8/19/11
ELGIN IL 60123 11.07.53
Fax: Contacti MIKE S.
1000 6��4 GROVE DOORS SOD 96453 8/19/11 &B 4161d For-,Aal*age
•-r r �ii'i -- r '�
DESCRIPTION
•
wwtxx rw*xxxxx,rsxx QUOTAS rx w*xxxt,xxtr€w•
x ♦xrt* C A S C 0 xx* xs*
CUSTOM ROVBRSI'Z'$" ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
DOOR, WIDE STILE AND RAIL CONST., LO-E
1" INSULATED GLASS, A,LL 'SWEBFS AND
WEATHERSTRIPPING INCLUDED, PANIC'EXIT
BAR INCLUDED WITH SXTBRIOR HARDWARE,
DOOR CLOSURE INCLUDED.
1 0 1 BA 4/0 X 7/0 DOOR WITH FRAME 21160.00 21160.00
MASONITE EXTERIOR DOOR, 6-9;116" FJP
JAMB, OUTSWING DOOR, BRASS SPRING
LOADED HINGES, FLUSH DOOR SLAB
1 0 1 BA 3/0 X 61'8 228.00 225.00
Comments` 178.88
Order Taker: KBC Ship Via: DELIVERED * , 2,563.88
x*xxx* Email Copy' xx*�xxx
R. J. CARR+a L
L ELECTRICAL
628 SOUTH STREET
ELGIN IL.. (PHONE)
60123 (847)902-9047
TO DATE
Chooch's
Mike Butirro Aug.18 2011
64 South Grove Ave
Elgin TL.6012
PHONE)(847) 759-OIY51
JOB
Chooch's
GENERAL Mike Butrro 64 S.Grove Ave.
ESTIMATE, NO. M76
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY AGREES TO FURNISH LABOR AND MATERIAL TO INSTALL ELECTRICAL
WIRING AND EOUIPMM,ON THE PREMISES AS SPECIFIED HEREIN.THE PRICE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
AS MENTIONED IIEREWMAYBE CHANGED,IF CUSTOMERS ACCEP'T'ANCE IS NOT IN OUR HANDS Lei 30 DAYS
FROM DATF-,UP0NACCEP7TNG,THIS PROPOSAL BECOMES A CONTRACT,THE PROPOSED WORK TO BE
DONE IS AS FOLLOWS'.
WORKMEN WILL BE PROPERLY COVERED BY PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE,A INSURANCE
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE WILL BE ISSUED TO YOU UPON REQUEST,OWNERS TO CARRY FIRE
INSURANCE ON THE ABOVE WORK.
ALL WORK PERFORMED UNDER TATS PROPOSAL IS TO BE EXECUTED DURING THE REGULAR
WORKING HOURS Of TIE DAY,NAMELY BETWEEN 8:00 AM AND 4:30 PM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY
EXCEF TING LEGAL HOLIDAYS.
THE ACCEPTOR AGREES TO PAY AND DISCHARGE ALL COST AND ATTORNEYS FEES AND EXPENSES
THAT SHALL ARISE FROM ENFORCING THE TERMS OF THIS CONTRACT BY THE UNDERSIGNED,
INCLUDING SUCH•RL4$0NABLI ATr ORNEY FEES INCURRED RESULTING FROM THE NON-PAYMENT OF
THE AMOUNT HEREUNDER.
THE UNDFRSIGNEI)SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE WHATSOEVER RESULTING
FROM DELAY OR DESTRUCTION OF OR 1NAMY TO THE WORK OR MATERIAL[TURING CONSTRUCTION IF
CAUSED BY LOCKOUT,LABOR DIFFICULTIES,FIRE,RIOT,M0I3,THE ELEMENTS,EARTHQUAKE,TORNADO.
CYCLONE,LIGHTD G,PUBLIC ENEMY,OR ACT OF GOD.
ADDITIONAL WORK MAY BE ORDERED BY THE CUSTOMER ANY TTME,BEFORE THE WORK IS
STARTED,AT THE UNIT PRICES NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE,ANY OTHER CHANGE FROM THE WORT{AS
HEREIN DESCRIBED INVOLVING ADDITIONAL COST OF LABOR AND MATERIAL IS TO BE PAID FOR BY THE
CUSTOMER IN ADDITION TO THE CONTRACT PRICE NAMED HEREIN.AT THE PRICE AGREED UPON OR
OUR REGULAR SLATES FOR THE TIME AND MATERIAL WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE
WRITTEN ORDERS FOR ALL ADDITIONAL WORK,WHETTER IT BE ON A CONTRACT PRICE,UNIT PRICE,OR
TIME AND MATERIAL.BASIS_BEFORE PROCEEDING WrrH SUCH EXTRA WORK PAYMENTS FOR
ADDITIONAL CONTRACTS TO THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT,SHALL BE MADE UNDER THE SAME TERMS,AND
CONDITIONED AS ARE EMBODIED IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT TIE
REQUIRED TO PROCEED WITH INSTALLATION OF WORK IF THE PAYMENTS APPLYING ON SAME HAVE
BEEN MADE AS SPECIFIED IN THE CONTRACT.
(a) Install piping,outlet boxes and wiring,from basement area to front
above entry for sign service disconnect.
(Note) Sign circuit to be connected to 24 hour timer in basement area.
0-front outside fighting.
(a)install piping,outlet boxes,and wiring for,2-wall mount light fixture's l-
each side of entry.
(b)install piping,outlet boxes and wiring for 2• indirect light fixtures
(Note) Lighting Fixture's are included within the hereunder proposal amount.
Lighting future's shall be connected to 24 hour timer
i atoll piping,outlet boxes and wiring,for 4-out door light fixture's on rear of
building.,connected;to 24 hour timer.
(41,:install 1-2/pole intermatic 24 hour timer for out door lighting and sign.
(TERMS) 65%p to be paid upon electrical rough % remaining 35% to be paid
upon final inspection/
(note)Electrical permits are not within the hereunder proposal amount,
All Material and or that of lighting fixtures,timer,and apparatuses are included
within proposal amount
Total light fixture(9)Nine, (1)One Sign.
ACCEPTOR AGREES TO PAY Two Thaasaad_Six iiundren Twenty Four
—&-.00 CENTS
S2,624.00 _&_00 CENTS
IT IS AGREED 111 ['4!EEN PART=HEREINALL.RIGHT,TTTLg$,AND INTEREST IN AND TO THE PROPERTY
MATERIAL,EQUIPMEWr AND FIXTURES INSTALLED UNDER TRW CONTRACT SHALL"REMAIN ON THE
PROPERTY OF TIDE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR UNDER THE T'EIIMBUF THIS'CONTRACT"i UNTIL PAYMENT
IN FULL HAS BEEN MADE.WHEN THE CONTRACT HAS SEEN SIGNED AND ACMPTVD,MATERIAL ORDERED
FOR THIS WORK AND CONTRACT SHALL NOT THEREFORE BE SUBJECT TO CANCELLATION.
ALL THE ABOVE WORK WILL BE DONE,IN NEAT AND WOR104MLIKX MANNER,AND COMPLY WITH THE
RULES AND REGULATIONS OF TIIE DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL INSPECTION OR NATIONAL
ELECTRICAL CODE.
ACCEPTED BY
BY CONTRACTOR
DATE DATE
THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT BECOME A CONTRACT UNTIL SIGNED BY THIS COMPANY
PRICES MAY CHANGE WITHIN A 30 DAY PERIOD DUE COST OF MATERIAL
i
i
j
r"IQET I N
I
20 S. Spring Street
Elgin, IL 60 120
84?-'?41- 3829 fax 84'7---'741--88! 9
bsgraphi,cs a sbcglobal.net
QUOTE r
9/16/11
CHOOCH'S PIZZERIA
64 S. Grove, Elgin
jJ
`. 15" formed plastic letters installed
CHOOCH'S PIZZERIA $1,871.60
Vinyl lettering above door $356.00
Vinyl lettering on door address $35.00
i
Total $2,261.60
Quote good for 30 days
{
Dale Wisniewski
.............. ....... .....................
CHOOCH ' S PIZZERIA
CHOOCH'S PIZZERIA _ '
CHOOCH 'S PIZZERIA
CHOOCH'S PIZZERIA
.................................. ...................... ............................. ........................ ..........
CHOOCH 'S PIZZERIA
Letters 15" x 19. 55
t .••... a•. • 11� -.. y wYY.+_•�4�.� ...r.. ....e.F..{,.'S
-
r _
S .
_
..... .....-_ i /4 �............
hooctfs
:9A:
} �y1 � �x oxim Em.' � ♦ 4 .
i ;ry-�• t y (!
l
f
I D�]•'��t;1j]��rrp
M. DATA lT I& PRWsS't� B L'2-1'Y A
FACADE REMODELING FOR: COLOR 11101
S GROVE VE RENDERING ARCHME Dru SIGN
ELGIN, IL 60120 Muols am
l - �
bid to be revised
and resubmitted . -•��
Construction Management
Proposal
September 23,2011
Mike Butirro
64 S. Grove Avenue
Elgin,Illinois 60120
REGARDING: Renovation work on buildinn exterior at 64S.Grove,Elgin,Illinois
Dean Mr.Butirro,
Thank you for the opportunity to present you with a proposal for the above address to
complete the work for the exterior renovations.
SCOPE OF WORK:
1. Demolition per specification submitted 9/14/11 and drawings dated 9/6/11.
rk a. Demolition cost$5,940.00
2. Carpentry for the ADA Ramp per plans installed in wood per drawings dated 9/6/11.
a. Carpentry cost$4,010.00
3. Carpentry for the 2id floor wood stairs installed per drawings dated 9/6/11.
a. Carpentry cost$4,240.00
4. Masonry tuckpointing and modifications per spec/drawings dated 9/6/11.
a. Masonry cost$11,625.00
5. Painting rear of building only per spec/drawings dated 9/6/11.
a. Painting cost$1,400.00
"J
All work notated above will be completed for the lump sum cost of Twenty-Seven
Thousand Two Hundred Fifteen Dollars Even ($27,215.00).
Again,thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. Please call or email me with V�
any questions.
i
Respectfully submitted, h '
Brian Harrington
President
DESIGN BUILDERS,GENERAL CONTRACTING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
800 Dundee Avenue,Elgin,IL 60120
Office:847-760-6655 qty f
Fax:847-841-1020 Toll Free Fax:866-944-3DCM
www.3dimensionconstruction.com
HINES ELECTRIC
P.P. Box 967•
Elgin, 11. 60121
847--:888_3399
PRO.P05ftl SUBMIfSEff;TO Py.ONE DA-M
2.01
STREe -Joe MXKFF..
CITY,rSTATE Ali-ZIP CODE JOBIOCA,T,ION
ARCRCr£CT O 8 PHONE
?
.[PhTf We:hereby submit spQCificafions and estimete5 tor-
_.._..
t •
p_ � lh __.._..__._._...._.. -._........._...
s
_..._ �...__... . ....... -......_... __ ..._.......-. _... _.._............_..........._._._...:.:_..........
�-
—
j L
r
;p -f p; lfllit hereby to .furnish material and labor — complete in accordance with above specifications, for the -sum of:
dollars($ 5�
Payment to tie made as foilows:
6f :—> �
(oa o°-=
All material lg.guaranteQiJ to he as specified, 1411 work to Ue completed In a workmanlike Authorized r �
rhanner_according-to standard practices.Any etteration:orAeviatiorn from abovq spec
tflcg Si na
tions Invelvi.i)-g extra costs_ yAl be executed only upon-written orders and wip-become!in .g Lure
extre.charge over and aladve.theestimate.All agreements contingent upon strikes,accident Note Th1s.proposal maybe u
or delays beyond cur control.Owner to.carry fire,tornado and other necessary rnsurance. withdrawn.b us.rf not.accepted.within / days.
Our workors are tlitly covered by Workmen's Comoeosation Insurance. Y
1—The above rices,.specifieations
XX .' X .. p Signature
and condttions.are satisfactory and are hereby.accepted. You are authorized
to do the work as specified.-Payment will be made as outlined above,
Signature
Date Pf Acceptance:
-- PRODIICTIi&3 � lac.Caton,MmOI471.ToedvnlONETOttfREEI+M2256380 -
nc.
.. ........
725 Schneider Drive • Unit 4 • South Elgin, IL 60177 • Phone: (847) 741-0988 • Fax: (847) 741-0958
DATE: August 4, 2011
TO: Mike Butirro PROJECT: Chooch's Pizza
64 South Grove
Elgin, Illinois
WE HEREBY PROPOSE TO FURNISH AND INSTALL THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW
Aluminum doors, frames, storefront windows and glazing
Including: Three (3) doors at east entry (1), interior vestibule (1) and west entrance(1)
Fourteen (14)dormer windows
Storefront windows at east and west elevations per drawings
Interior vestibule at east entry
Clear anodized 2"x 4 1/2°; thermallv broken aluminum
Push/pulls, deadiatches with paddle, closers, hi n es, and weatherstri in
1"insulated clear qlass
TOTAL: $67p860.00
Add for operable vent windows at west a eva io ADD: 680.00E EACH
We are a union shop and pa revailin yva es
ADDENDA: None
EXCEPTIONS: None
DELIVERY: Jobsite
TERMS OF PAYMENT: NET 30 DAYS
THE ABOVE PRICES, SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS
ARE SATISFACTORY AND ARE HEREBY ACCEPTED.
ACCEPTED BY: RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
SIGNATURE: QUINT G, INCORPORATED
DATE: GREGORY D. GUDEMAN
Note—Phis proposal may he withdrawn If not accepted within is days.
S�B'YCT�OwASOW
847-742-9530 QUOTE
FAX 847-742-9579
DATE Quote#
8/19t2011 8003
BILL TO
Cboocb's Pizzeria
Attn: Mike Butirro
64 S.Grove Ave.
Elgin,IL 60120
P.O.NO. TERMS PROJECT
50'/o deposit with o...
DESCRIPTION QTY RATE AMOUNT
In X 3/8"thick Flat Curt Acrylic,stud mount,standard color- 1 799.68 799.68T
CHOOCH'S PIZZERIA
Mounting Pattern 1 136.00 136.00T
shipping 1 25.00 25.00
TX 5'2 color Pre-spaced lettering-Logo on glass 1 257.32 257.32T
Installation by SBT personnel 1 200.00 200.00
NOTE: Permits by others. Flush Stud mount available for an
additional charge. Reducing letter thiclmess will reduce the price.
If installation is over 15'above ground,then a lift will have to be
rented for$630.
Illinois/Kane County sales tax 7.75% 92.46
WE APPRECIATE YOUR BUSINESS,PLEASE STAY IN TOUCH.
Total $1,510.46
Attachment Q� +
Fagade Improvement Estimate Comparison
Masonry(tuckpointing,tile replacement)
Electrical & Lighting
Doors &Windows* ,
Structure & Carpentry , � h.° -
Signage
r"j,
Paintings"......p ��
Demolition
Waterproof, Caulk,Seal
Roofing (includes cornice repair and roof edging) '
Architectural Services 4
a
Contingency
Totals
City 35%
Owner 65% $40,694.61 $54,830.75
* Indicates 500 of total estimate for windows/doors; other 50% covered by EECDBG.
Attachment E
+ Y
.; .,s-t�`:;1-;p:q:�- •''�.Rt•.
1'Y;;.it'��. .. .:r �..�•... ''��� •wiJ.'i�-Q•bv#lY.Y.b+•dI'4.. -
:. Y T. Si=�YY�.��,li-.T •I A ia - �e.j.'i: a, kY.iF •�.`-fr '�
LF
tV
Aq... ....... •.yu. - ':Z�i"}:'R:�^,!.i l?YUs:l4'.wI rR 1'Y'•t...u.�R1• I- +
.r/
JET pP-c f
2 `;-
\
W� 1
hooch's /-t"c I r�
GgI20
a..
i
e4 ZAY
-ir
S. GROVE AVE ELEVATION
1Y. DAM 9HM TYPE°. pson ? No. B S:}iS.iV A
FACADE REMODELING FOR: COLOR 19101
64 S GROVE AVE RENDERING .ARCIRTE DESIGN
221 DUPA STRUT
ELGIN, IL 60120 DAPS 8-4-9 Al Elgin. Minis 80120
847 897-•0280 OF
i
,. �r.�� _:.:!'.. �'�.1t..4F..�.i- �_ .�rc�icl�d. -")•eft �.f,i, -
((l.
S
Y
,ar7arwa� casv►aaa� ti►r► r.ea�►�' �►.w .�r�aa�
R ►A-yR i``7 R !
1 �
S�
�}�..�.._ �'�}r.rT.M �:bt i�i•1_.. m-trP 4^�' � } <n�i � .i.`t 7 a•
,i
,1
�1
ME
t qQ c�
w-1
�
rS¢19i?".YI"µ...�.allYG'S.�..-.".Ri.�-��%•7N
►. �;l!■111ttt'/�IRI i!'%r'�c`-Y;
b.:�� iii•rt..,...�
tY R#1115A it1E!Y NR i!•I t£J',ftl2 i.::l ��..`! pwSv I ` Y
0.7SIn yyyyS�yy��yy�� a■rr TSf~L'.-: RCx'9�.._,;] 1
tlY RQA171 �R � �tSt7°!41`J9 1R,YiiR1 ��
k`.°'Y'�QW RR I49 fr9 K:! 1:5".IP47
,-
Al �c5�iiiiMi! in..f7!!�3741
rim IR
f3s1! �� � ■ M171W i1i,1 '�'![+ 7•ll
ling fill I =M11
am m mm
R i,r QM!1 Emma :4YIi1�■
FACADE • i •' ®� • - ® r fiELGIN, IL 60120 A
minds mm
r
__ r. ir,:1
a
............. ...... ....-sEaoND t:LOOR
eEIIING UNE
\ lUC1C PANT 75X CK OCY'G MORTAR.ONn AND
\ 0.UX TOOE CF CXTG GlAW WIRA COTTA
NEW 4gk30YlS TO Rf9tACE EXT'C.
SECOND
FLOOR LINE
FIRST BOOR
I=CWIT m or Wo. CEILING LINE
AR 4INTS AND OLEM
TFs'gtA COTTA
ss�
Eq NO DART rft PNhW TO MATCH
MO=M CITY ROSY SICH 1 DETA9L ASOW
KOTOSlf.O METAL PANEL
Hl
.............................................................................................. .................... N�........
CEILING LINE
6ASEMEN7
...........................................................FkQ..QB lmg........
t S. GROVE AVE ELEVATION
A I Ii.d'dV'
l f " Vor
NMI�t teta psa/z�+r INU. $ERNA.FACADE REMODELING FOR:64 S GROVE AVE D �ELGIN I L 60120 2JZ3 DvpA 20
ELGIN, i11bS 7-`Z7-11 Al �s4�'69�0290 20_.,, L
TUCKPOINT AND CLEAN cxrG
MASONRY EXTERIOR
....................
................. ........I...................
;—.. ................................
SECOND FLOOR
CEILING LINE
w
ILREUGVE EXTC.AND!NSTAI.L
NEW GUTTER AND D.S-
REMOVE
DOOR Ar*'
......... ..... ......
.....
WINDOW k DooR ........
L HT TO 44'A.FF
AND INSTALL NEW WINDOWS'
.............. .... . ....
......................... SECOND
.............. .........
.......................FLOOR LINE
........................
FIRST FLOOR
NEW WOOD DECK,HANDRAILS,
STAIRS AND LANDING CEILING LINE
TUCKPOINT AND CLEAN EXT-0
NY EXTERAO.R: REMOVE
PRIME-0 PAINT AS REOD.
f 1,41M. DEMO.ALL EVE
WINDOW COtiIRr,WINDOWS.
DOORS.FIRE ESCAPE
ROOFS,DECK, GUTTERS -
REMOVE
WNDOWS oj%D
REMOVE EXVC AND DO%VNSpOUTS
INSTALL NEW immowS
—REMOvk-Exro. 000R AtID
U INSTALL NEW DOOR
N�
NEW LARGE BEA?j UIURE PLANTER BOXES N.!.C.
......................... NEW tww RAMP
...... W/LANDING FIRST FLOOR LIN
........... ........I......I.........
..........
6 FT MCH NEW METAL CATS CEILING LINE
f X 2'COMMoN GRADE LINE
S?JOCK MASONRY 2.X 2z'ooytjoMN NEW WOOD NEW WOOD
BRICK MASONRY RARJNG AND STAIRS
Fire.X431d.re........ ........ IRS Amo DECK
PJEJR.J5M.CAp......................... ....�MD I R ........ ...... EASEMENT
RIVER VIDE ELEVATION
FACADE REMODELING FOR: IRREV. DATE SHUT MIR pJTOJarr ND. BERNA
64 S GROVE AVE 11101
ARCHITEI�QjL_,CN
MET
ELGIN,. IL 60120 DATE 2 221 D STREET
7-27-11 Elgin, Illinois 60120
847 897-0260
1 �
4i�R
x;412' I a'
:. c7 1 .y
... vi a,in fi 'ri
� 9
F 157Tk6 FLOC
%.-•+• r- }I((I WOiE: sEE 3/ Cx i 1
fiN5TAJ.E[1 SiJC T<OiT 6'
8aa
{RAVP M i7 iE EASM&T `WHCDUM INTO EASRNC 12--N
t—. I 0-fl vERt;CALLY Vrm-AL
AT DUST.FWD. ` -•�� !I�
1s:h'• apk 77^ EiS Fi {
r r
• 1 t�
r
I :n O uJ N
t
ooz
1 Kill,
a
uj i
LL
I
1
RIVER SIDE EXTERIOR BASEIMENT FLOOR PLA N � I�
t tits"=1L�° f f
f 11
I � i
n�
. Qo
FUTURE = .a
CUMPSTER.
AREA
d
.. .... .. .. T I
2O:_S 9.. .T. �.. 5'rO"'•'... to Tom,M1 i6'-a', �� tv�.,
a
L'
.'.',Y,.OQA[�NT.CiVa.Q'...'.'.............. ... i
cai a .c
..........
METAL CASE
ir
1 I I U, ') WWP DOM TO SAMWENI*LEVEL BELOW STAIR --IJP•.• a�
SEE 0140.3/A2
1 E a•-D`
I I )N CONCAFTE RE7AININC WAIT I
I a T 0 11'= 7-.4' ne-1i
I j1
INSTAL'ED SMUG TIGHT 6'
FUTURE
i PATIO n I I EM9..0DED INTO EXIS144O 12'.^,
D.C. %'F.TMCALLY 7.-TiCAL A
�1 BEAM ABOVE--, J y s AT FXISf.PAD.
1 y�M1
PLANTER- I i U _ •; o;)
`
PL•4N1S N.M.C. r V ' O
M I Iu Y• �! LL.LLI N
MASONRY PIER- I I
I AND CAP \ I I J Q CD
0>O
UP --) f I "�� LANDING UP— » e 1
Z_
I I ON z ---f)u j i fl C7 I
.t
!i
i
I RIVER SIDE EXTERIOR FIRST FLOOR PLAN
f
—A,
fv7Uf 4�� }
STER' AREA
N
()
..8— K G
a
•J�—p" C
...... ....................
................................................................
J.•."....."...... V
..............................................................
................. .............f8 T O ii"a SR'-6�
�iba•I
METAL DATE V
I ° 1
( I! Ri.MP DOY,N TO 6A' ENT VEL h'LOw STAL �
SAW ENT
II 1 f
Il I+I
{ 8 T D ff'. 7-a" `-CONCRETE RETAMING WALL
1
II 1
INSTALIF_D SNUG tii#IT E"
Fv'm ( - !1: EMBEDOW INTO EXISTNG e
1 PATIO n I I O.C. VERTICALLY TYP(CAL^+
�I BEAM ABO%E {{ YWi AT EXIST.FNO,
1
PLANTER- �y I _
I
PINITS N.I,C�\ `\.
2'X 2' �•. -:�+�. Q'
MASONRY PIER-- 1` _
AND CAP \ I I \ 1 N
\ w,
11
� o> o f
t 11P- ► n !I <--DN tANCInc up--+ �0 Z
i:fJ W J
z Lu
f SO'-O. 12 5'-0" It •• 0.' 0
.. V W
I� l
I RIVER 'SM EXTERIOR SECOND FLOOR PLAN
it
I 'IIa-1 U
1 I
7 Technical Presemtion services
Preservation Briefs t4atianal Park service
U.S.Department of the tntor or
The preservation of
Historic Glazed Architectural Terra-Cotta
de Teel Patterson Tiller
>>What is Terra-Cotta
»Types of Terra-Cotta 4
>>Characteristics of Glazed Architectural Terra-Cotta
>>Common Deterioration Problems A
>>Deterioration Inspection and Analysis
>>Maintenance, Repair and Replacement
>>Summary
>>Further Reading
A NOTE TO OUR USERS:The web versions of the Preservation Briefs differ somewhat from the printed versions.
Many illustrations are new, captions are simplified, illustrations are typically in color rather than black and white, and
some complex charts have been omitted.
Glazed architectural terra-cotta was significant in the development of important
architectural idioms in this country--specifically, the "Chicago School," the High Rise and
the Historic or Beaux Arts styles. In fact, glazed architectural terra-cotta is one of the most
prevalent masonry building materials found in the urban environment today. Popular
between the late 19th century and the 1930s, glazed architectural terra-cotta offered a
modular, varied and relatively inexpensive approach to wall and floor construction. It was
particularly adaptable to vigorous and rich ornamental detailing. However, with changing
vogues in materials and architectural styles and rising production costs, glazed
architectural terra-cotta fell into disfavor and disuse by the mid 20th century.
Today, information on the maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement of glazed
architectural terra-cotta is limited, as are sources of new glazed architectural terra-cotta.
This report, then, will discuss some of the major deterioration problems that commonly
occur in historic glazed architectural terra-cotta, methods of determining the extent of that
deterioration and recommendations for the maintenance, repair and replacement of the
deteriorated historic material.
What is Terra-Cotta?
Generically, the broadest definition of terra-cotta refers to a high grade of weathered or
aged clay which, when mixed with sand or with pulverized fired clay, can be molded and
fired at high temperatures to a hardness and compactness not obtainable with brick.
Simply put, terra-cotta is an enriched molded clay brick or block. The word terra-cotta is
derived from the Latin word terra-cotta--literally, "cooked earth." terra-cotta clays vary
widely in color according to geography and types, ranging from red and brown to white.
Terra-cotta was usually hollow cast in blocks which were open to the back, like boxes, with
internal compartment-like stiffeners called webbing. Webbing substantially strengthened
the load-bearing capacity of the hollow terra-cotta block without greatly increasing its
weight.
Terra-cotta blocks were often finished with a glaze; that is, a slip glaze (clay wash) or an
aqueous solution of metal salts was brushed or sprayed on the air-dried block before firing.
Glazing changed the color, imitated different finishes, and produced a relatively impervious
surface on the weather face of the final product. The glaze on the terra-cotta unit
possessed excellent weathering properties when properly maintained. It had rich color and
provided a hard surface that was not easily chipped off. Glazing offered unlimited and fade-
resistant colors to the designer. Even today, few building materials can match the glazes
on terra-cotta for the range and, most importantly, the durability of colors.
Types of Terra-cotta
Historically there are four types or categories of terra-cotta which have enjoyed wide use in
the history of the American building arts: 1) brownstone, 2) fireproof construction, 3)
ceramic veneer, and 4) glazed architectural.
Brownstone terra-cotta is the variety of this masonry material used earliest in American
buildings (mid to late 19th century). The brownstone type is a dark red or brown block
either glazed (usually a slip glaze) or unglazed. It was hollow cast and was generally used
in conjunction with other masonry in imitation of sandstone, brick or real brownstone. It is
often found in the architecture of Richard Upjohn, James Renwick, H. H. Richardson and is
associated with the Gothic and Romanesque Revival movements through such ornamental
detailing as moldings, finials and capitals.
Fireproof construction terra-cotta was extensively developed as a direct result of the
growth of the High Rise building in America. Inexpensive, lightweight and fireproof, these
rough-finished hollow building blocks were ideally suited to span the I-beam members in
floor, wall and ceiling construction. Certain varieties are still in production today, although
fireproof construction terra-cotta is no longer widely employed in the building industry.
Ceramic veneer was developed during the 1930s and is still used extensively in building
construction today. Unlike traditional architectural terra-cotta, ceramic veneer is not hollow
cast, but is as its name implies: a veneer of glazed ceramic tile which is ribbed on the back
in much the same fashion as bathroom tile. Ceramic veneer is frequently attached to a grid
of metal ties which has been anchored to the building.
Glazed architectural terra-cotta was the most
complex development of terra-cotta as a
masonry building material in this country. The
hollow units were hand cast in molds or
carved in clay and heavily glazed (often in
imitation of stone) and fired. Sometimes
called "architectural ceramics," glazed
architectural terra-cotta was developed and
refined throughout the first third of the 20th
century and has been closely associated with
the architecture of Cass Gilbert, Louis
Sullivan, and Daniel H. Burnham, among
others. Significant examples in this country
Glazed architectural terra-cotta was a practical include the Woolworth Building (1913) in New
and highly decorative building material. Photo: York City and the Wrigley Building (1921) in
NPS files.
Chicago.
Late 19th and early 20th century advertising promoted the durable, impervious and
adaptable nature of glazed architectural terra-cotta. It provided for crisp, vigorous
modeling of architectural details as the molds were cast directly from clay prototypes
without loss of refinement. Glazed architectural terra-cotta could accommodate subtle
nuances of modeling, texture and color. Compared to stone, it was easier to handle,
quickly set and more affordable to use. Thought to be fireproof and waterproof, it was
readily adaptable to structures of almost any height. The cost of molding the clay, glazing
and firing the blocks, when compared to carving stone, represented a considerable savings,
especially when casts were used in a modular fashion--that is, repeated over and over
again. Maintenance of the fired and glazed surface was easy; it never needed paint and
periodic washings restored its original appearance.
With the passage of time, many of the phenomenal claims of the early proponents of
glazed architectural terra-cotta have proven true. There are many examples throughout
this country that attest to the durability and permanence of this material. Yet present-day
deterioration of other significant glazed architectural terra-cotta resources ultimately belie
those claims. Why? Historically, the lack of foresight or understanding about the nature
and limitations of the material has, in many instances, allowed serious deterioration
problems to occur that are only now becoming apparent.
Characteristics of Glazed Architectural Terra-cotta as a Building
Material
Glazed architectural terra-cotta has many material properties similar to brick or stone. It
also has many material properties radically different from those traditional masonry
materials. It is those differences which must be considered for a better understanding of
some of the material characteristics of glazed architectural terra-cotta when it is used as a
building material.
Difficult to identify: Glazed architectural terra-cotta probably comprises one of the
largest if not the largest constituent material in some of our urban environments today.
However, the infinite varieties of glazing have hidden this fact from the casual observer.
One of the attractive features of glazed architectural terra-cotta in its time was that it
could be finished (glazed) in exact imitation of stone. In fact, many building owners and
architects alike are often surprised to discover that what they presumed to be a granite or
limestone building is glazed architectural terra-cotta instead.
Two separate systems: Historically, glazed
architectural terra-cotta has been used in
association with two specific and very different
.�t types of building systems: as part of a traditional
load-bearing masonry wall in buildings of modest
height, and as a cladding material in High Rise
s construction. As cladding, glazed architectural
°" .. terra-cotta often utilized an extensive metal
anchoring system to attach it or to "hang it" onto
t a wall framing system or superstructure. In the
first instance the anchoring was limited; in the
second, the anchoring was often extensive and
complex. Likewise, in the first instance,
deterioration has generally been limited.
Typical construction detail of glazed However, where glazed architectural terra-cotta
architectural terra-cotta ornament. Drawing: was used as cladding, particularly in high rise
Detail,Architectural Terra Cotta, Charles E. Construction, present-day deterioration and
White,Jr., 1920. failure are often severe.
Complexity of deterioration: Deterioration is, by nature of the design, infinitely
complex--particularly when glazed architectural terra-cotta has been used as a cladding
material.
Deterioration creates a "domino"like breakdown of the whole system: glazed units, mortar,
metal anchors, and masonry backfill. In no other masonry system is material failure
potentially so complicated.
Poor original design: The root of deterioration in glazed architectural terra-cotta systems
often lies in a misapplication of the material. Historically, glazed architectural terra-cotta
was viewed as a highly waterproof system needing neither flashing, weep holes nor drips.
This supposition, however, has proved to be untrue, as serious water-related failure was
evident early in the life of many glazed architectural terra-cotta clad or detailed buildings.
Common Deterioration Problems
No one case of deterioration in glazed architectural terra-cotta is ever identical to another
owing to the infinite number of variations with the material: original manufacture, original
installation inconsistencies, number of component parts, ongoing repairs or the various
types and sources of deterioration. However, certain general statements may be made on
the nature of glazed architectural terra-cotta deterioration.
Material failure can most commonly be attributed to water-related problems. However, less
frequent though no less severe causes may include: faulty original craftsmanship, which is
often cited but hard to determine; stress-related deterioration; damage caused by later
alterations and additions; or inappropriate repairs.
Water-related deterioration: As with most building conservation and rehabilitation
problems, water is a principal source of deterioration in glazed architectural terra-cotta.
Terra-cotta systems are highly susceptible to such complex water-related deterioration
problems as glaze crazing, glaze spalling and material loss, missing masonry units and
deteriorated metal anchoring, among others.
Crazing, or the formation of small random
cracks in the glaze, is a common form of water-
related deterioration in glazed architectural
terra-cotta. When the new terra-cotta unit first
comes from the kiln after firing, it has shrunken
(dried) to its smallest possible size. With the
passage of time, however, it expands as it k
absorbs moisture from the air, a process which
may continue for many years. The glaze then ,
goes into tension because it has a lesser
capacity for expansion than the porous the n'
body; it no longer "fits" the expanding unit onto water and air-borne moisture entering the
which it was originally fired. If the strength of glazed architectural terra-cotta causes
the glaze is exceeded, it will crack (craze). expansion of the porous clay body, increasing
its volume.This upsets the "fit" of the glaze
Crazing is a process not unlike the random and makes its surface shatter, which is
hairline cracking on the surface of an old oil commonly called "crazing." Photo: NPS files.
painting. Both may occur as a normal process in
the aging of the material. Unless the cracks visibly extend into the porous the body
beneath the glaze, crazing should not be regarded as highly serious material failure. It
does, however, tend to increase the water absorption capability of the glazed architectural
terra-cotta unit.
Spalling, the partial loss of the masonry material itself, is, like crazing, caused by water
and is usually a result not only of airborne water but more commonly of water trapped
within the masonry system itself. Trapped water is often caused by poor water detailing in
the original design, insufficient maintenance, rising damp or a leaking roof. In most cases,
trapped water tends to migrate outward through masonry walls where it eventually
evaporates. In glazed architectural terra-cotta, the water is impeded in its journey by the
relatively impervious glaze on the surface of the unit which acts as a water barrier. The
water is stopped at the glaze until it builds up sufficient pressure (particularly in the
presence of widely fluctuating temperatures) to pop off sections of the glaze (glaze
spalling) or to cause the wholesale destruction of portions of the glazed architectural terra-
cotta unit itself (material spalling).
Glaze spalling (left) may appear as small coin-size
blisters where the glaze has ruptured and exposed
the porous tile body beneath. This may occur as
several spots on the surface or, in more advanced
cases of deterioration, it may result in the wholesale
Va�ii R disappearance of the glaze. Spalling of the glaze
may also be symptomatic of deterioration (rusting)
of the internal metal anchoring system which holds
the terra-cotta units together and to the larger
building structure. The increase in volume of the
$ metal created by rusting creates increased internal
g pressures in the terra-cotta unit which, in turn, may
rc spall the glaze, or in more extreme cases, cause
material spalling.
Material spalling is a particularly severe situation.
Blistering of the glaze, like crazing, is the Not only is the visual integrity of the detailing
result of the increase in water in the impaired, but a large area of the porous underbody,
porous clay body and the subsequent webbing and metal anchoring is exposed to the
destruction of the glaze as a result of destructive effects of further water entry and
water migration and pressure. Glaze
spalling may also be caused by deterioration. Both glaze and material spalling must
deterioratoln of metal anchors behind the be dealt with as soon as possible. Missing units is a
terra-cotta unit. photo: NPs files. serious situation which particularly plagues
architectural terra-cotta systems. Unlike brick or
stone, damaged glazed architectural terra-cotta is exceedingly difficult to replace. New
production is extremely limited. Missing units create gaps which increase the structural
load on the remaining pieces and also permit water to enter the system. Exposed or
freestanding glazed architectural terra-cotta detailing (balusters, urns, parapet walls, etc.)
are particularly susceptible to extensive loss of material.
These elements face the most severe vicissitudes of water and temperature-related
deterioration in direct proportion to the extent of their exposure. The replacement of
missing units should be a high priority work item in the rehabilitation of glazed
architectural terra-cotta.
Deterioration of metal anchoring; Deteriorated anchoring systems are perhaps the
most difficult form of glazed architectural terra-cotta deterioration to locate or diagnose.
Often, the damage must be severe and irreparable before it is noticed on even the most
intense "prima facie" examination. Water which enters the glazed architectural terra-cotta
system can rust the anchoring system and substantially weaken or completely disintegrate
those elements. Where water has been permitted to enter the system, some deterioration
has more than likely taken place. Partial deterioration results in staining and material
spalling. Total deterioration and the lack of any anchoring system may result in the
loosening of the units themselves, threatening the architectural or structural integrity of
the building. Recently, failing glazed architectural terra-cotta units have become a serious
safety concern to many building owners and municipal governments. Early detection of
failing anchoring systems is exceedingly difficult.
Deterioration of mortar and other adjacent materials: Deteriorated mortar has
always been a key to the survival or failure of any masonry system. This is particularly true
with glazed architectural terra-cotta. In recognition of the fragile nature of the system, the
need for insuring a relatively dry internal system is important. Sound mortar is the "first
line" of defense in terra-cotta systems. It is a maintenance "must." Deteriorated mortar
joints are a singularly culpable source of water and, therefore, of deterioration. Mortar
deterioration may result from improper original craftsmanship or air--and waterborne--
pollution. More often, however, lack of ongoing maintenance is mainly responsible.
Deteriorated mortar should not be overlooked as a major source of glazed architectural
terra-cotta failure.
The deterioration of materials adjoining the glazed architectural terra-cotta (flashing,
capping, roofing, caulking around windows and doors) bears significant responsibility in its
deterioration. When these adjoining materials fail, largely as a result of lack of
maintenance, water-related deterioration results. For instance, it is not uncommon to find
wholesale terra-cotta spalling in close proximity to a window or doorway where the
caulking has deteriorated.
Stress-related deterioration: Stress-related deterioration of
glazed architectural terra-cotta frequently occurs in high rise
buildings. The evolution of stress relieving details (flexible
M joints, shelf angles, etc.) occurred late in the development of
American building construction. Consequently, most early
�r continuously clad High Rise buildings (c.1900-1920s) had little
or no provisions for normal material and building movement in
their original design.
The development of large stress-related cracks or wholesale
material deterioration is often caused by unaccommodated
building-frame shortening under load, thermal expansion and
contraction of the facade and moisture expansion of the glazed
architectural terra-cotta units themselves. Cracks running
through many units or stories or large areas of material
deterioration often indicate stress-related problems. This sort of
The damage shown here is deterioration, in turn, permits significant water entry into the
the result of direct live load terra-cotta system.
on a mid-rise building.The y
steel frame has settled and
shifted the weight onto the Inappropriate repairs: Inappropriate repairs result because
exterior terra-cotta cladding, using new terra-cotta for replacement of deteriorated or
resulting in rupturing of the
material. Photo: NPS files. missing glazed architectural terra-cotta has generally been
impractical. Repairs, therefore, have traditionally been made in
brick or cementitious build ups of numerous materials such as stucco or fiberglass. Some
materials are appropriate temporary or permanent replacements, while others are not.
(These issues are discussed at a later point in this report.) However, improper anchoring or
bonding of the repair work or visual incompatibility of repairs have themselves, with the
passage of time, become rehabilitation problems: replacement brick that is pulling free,
cement stucco that is cracking and spalling, or a cement or bituminous repairs that are not
visually compatible with the original material.
Alteration damage: Alteration damage has occurred as a result of the installation of such
building additions as signs, screens, marquees or bird proofing. These installations often
necessitated the boring of holes or cutting of the glazed architectural terra-cotta to anchor
these additions to the building frame beneath. As the anchoring or caulking deteriorated,
or as these elements were removed in subsequent renovation work, these holes have
become significant sources of water-related damage to the glazed architectural terra-cotta
system.
Deterioration Inspection and Analysis
Certain deterioration in glazed architectural terra-cotta may be on the building surface and
patently obvious to the casual observer--crazing, spalling, deterioration of mortar joints.
Other deterioration may be internal or within the masonry system and hard to determine--
deterioration of anchoring, deterioration behind the glaze, crumbling of internal webbing.
Prima facie, "first inspection," examination may indicate surface deterioration problems
while not revealing others. This demonstrates one of the most frustrating aspects of
dealing with deteriorated glazed architectural terra-cotta: that there are two systems or
levels of deterioration, one which is visible and the other which is not.
Material failure in glazed architectural terra-
cotta is necessarily complex. For this reason, it
is generally advised that the examination and
repair of this material should be the
responsibility of an experienced professional. {`
Few restorationists have experience in the
inspection, repair and replacement of glazed
architectural terra-cotta. This is certainly never
the province of the amateur or the most well-
intentioned but inexperienced architect or
engineer.
b
There are some methods of internal and
external inspection and analysis which are Material spalling is the result of excessive
expansion of the porous tile body caused by
relatively simple to the trained professional. water and freezing temperatures.This is a
Other methods, however, are expensive, time serious condition, often difficult to repair.
consumin g, and only hoto: NPS files.
yin the experimental stage
at this writing. These all generally preclude the use of anyone but an experienced
professional.
Preliminary cleaning: Before a terra-cotta building is analyzed for deterioration, it is
often advisable, but not always necessary, to clean the surface of the material. This is
particularly true when the material has been exposed to the vicissitudes of heavy urban
pollution. While most building materials are cleaned for "cosmetic" purposes, the cleaning
of glazed architectural terra-cotta for the purpose of inspection and analysis may be
advised. Dirt on glazed architectural terra-cotta often hides a multitude of problems. It is
only with cleaning that these problems become obvious. Recommended cleaning
procedures are covered later in the report.
Methods of inspection: Prima facie analysis is the unit by unit, firsthand, external
inspection of the glazed architectural terra-cotta building surface. Special note of all visible
surface deterioration (staining, crazing, spalling, cracking, etc.) should be made on
elevation drawings. Binoculars are often used where cost, height, or inaccessibility prevent
easy inspection. However, much deterioration may go unnoticed unless scaffolding or
window-washing apparatus is used in a true "hands on" inspection of each unit of the
facade.
Tapping, a somewhat inexact method of detection of internal deterioration is, nevertheless,
the most reliable inspection procedure presently available. Quite simply, tapping is the
striking of each unit with a wooden mallet. When struck, an undamaged glazed
architectural terra-cotta unit gives a pronounced ring, indicating its sound internal
condition. Conversely, deteriorated units (i.e., units which are failing internally) produce a
flat, hollow sound. Metal hammers are never to be used, as they may damage the glazed
surface of the unit. Extensive experience is the best teacher with this inspection method.
Infrared scanning is only in the experimental stage at this time, but its use seems to hold
great promise in locating deteriorated internal material in terra-cotta. All materials emit
heat--heat which can be measured in terms of infrared light. While infrared light cannot be
seen by the human eye, it can be measured by infrared scanning. Infrared photography, a
kind of infrared scanning, has been of particular use in detecting sources of heat loss in
buildings in recent years. Broken or loose internal terra-cotta pieces have a less firm
attachment to the surrounding firm or attached pieces and, therefore, have different
thermal properties, i.e., temperatures. These temperature differences become evident on
the infrared scan and may serve as a fair indication of internal material deterioration in
terra-cotta.
Sonic testing has been successfully used for some time to detect internal cracking of
concrete members. In the hands of an experienced operator, there are conditions where it
can detect internal failure in glazed architectural terra-cotta. Sonic testing registers the
internal configuration of materials by penetrating the material with sound waves and
reading the patterns that "bounce back" from the originating source of the sound. Readings
at variance with those from undeteriorated material might indicate collapsed webbing or
pools of water in the interior of the terra-cotta unit.
Metal detection is a non-destructive and generally useful way of locating the position of
internal metal anchoring. Metal detectors indicate the presence of metals by
electromagnetic impulses. These impulses are transmitted onto an oscilloscope where they
may he seen or they are converted to sound patterns which may be heard by the operator.
Original drawings are eminently useful in predicting where internal metal anchoring should
be. Metal detectors can confirm that indeed they are still there. Without original drawings,
the contractor or architect can still locate the metal anchoring, however. No reading where
an anchor would be expected could indicate a missing anchor or one that has seriously
deteriorated. The information produced by metal detection is, at best, only rough.
However, it is the most viable way of locating the internal metal anchoring without
physically removing, thus irreparably damaging, the glazed architectural terra-cotta units
themselves.
Laboratory analysis may be carried out on samples of removed original material to find
glaze absorption, permeability or glaze adhesion, or to evaluate material for porosity.
These tests are useful in determining the present material characteristics of the historic
glazed architectural terra-cotta and how they may be expected to perform in the future.
Maintenance, Repair and Replacement
Deterioration in glazed architectural terra-cotta is,
by definition, insidious in that the outward signs of
decay do not always indicate the more serious
problems within. It is, therefore, of paramount
importance that the repair and replacement of
deteriorated glazed architectural terra-cotta not be
undertaken unless the causes of that deterioration
have been determined and repaired. As mentioned ,
before, one of the primary agents of deterioration in
glazed architectural terra-cotta is water. Therefore,
water-related damage can be repaired only when
the sources of that water have been eliminated.
Repointing, caulking and replacement of missing Exposed or freestanding terra-cotta
mason feces are also of primary concern. Where detailing {parapets, urns, balusters, etc.)
masonry P P rY have traditionally been subjected to the
detailing to conduct water in the original design has most severe vicissitudes of deterioration
been insufficient, the installation of new flashing or as a result of freezing temperatures and
weep holes might be considered. water. Photo: NP5 files.
Where stress-related or structural problems have caused the deterioration of glazed
architectural terra-cotta, the services of a structural engineer should be sought to mitigate 4)
these problems. This may include the installation of relieving joints, shelf angles or flexible
joints. In any case, stress-related and structural deterioration, like water-related
deterioration, must be stopped before effective consolidation or replacement efforts may
begin.
Cleaning: The successful cleaning of glazed architectural terra-cotta removes excessive
soil from the glazed surface without damaging the masonry unit itself. Of the many
cleaning materials available, the most widely recommended are water, detergent, and a
natural or nylon bristle brush. More stubborn pollution or fire-related dirt or bird droppings
can be cleaned with steam or weak solutions of muriatic or oxalic acid.
A note of caution: Any acids, when used in strong enough solutions, may themselves
deteriorate mortar and "liberate" salts within the masonry system, producing a situation
called efflorescence.
Commercial cleaning solutions may be appropriate but probably are not necessary when
water and detergent will suffice. There are, however, certain cleaning techniques for glazed
terra-cotta which are definitely not recommended and which would damage the surface of
the material. These include: all abrasive cleaning measures (especially sandblasting), the
use of strong acids, (particularly fluoride-based acids), high-pressure water cleaning and
the use of metal bristle brushes. All of these techniques will irreparably harm the glaze in
one fashion or another and subsequently expose the porous tile body to the damaging
effects of water.
It is important to remember that glazed architectural terra-cotta was designed to be
cleaned cheaply and easily. This, in fact, was one of its major assets and was much
advertised in the selling of the material early in this century.
Waterproofing: The covering of crazed glazing with waterproof coatings is the subject of
an ongoing controversy today. The question involves whether or not the micro-cracks
conduct substantial amounts of water into the porous tile body. Tests indicate that the
glaze on new unexposed terra-cotta is itself not completely waterproof. Some testing also
indicates that most crazing on historic glazed terra-cotta does not substantially increase
the flow of moisture into the porous tile body when compared to new material. Excessive
and serious crazing is, however, an exception and the coating of those areas on a limited
scale may be wholly appropriate.
In an effort to stem water-related deterioration, architects and building owners often
erroneously attribute water-related damage to glaze crazing when the source of the
deterioration is, in fact, elsewhere: deteriorated caulking, flashing, etc. The waterproof
coating of glazed architectural terra-cotta walls may cause problems on its own. Outward
migration of water vapor normally occurs through the mortar joints in these systems. The
inadvertent sealing of these joints in the wholesale coating of the wall may exacerbate an
already serious situation. Spalling of the glaze, mortar, or porous body will, more than
likely, result.
Repointing: Repointing of mortar which is severely deteriorated
or improperly or infrequently maintained is one of the most
useful preservation activities that can be performed on historic
glazed architectural terra-cotta buildings. Ongoing and cyclical
repointing guarantees the long life of this material. Repointing
should always be carried out with a mortar which has a
compressive strength (measured in p.s.i.) lower than the
adjacent masonry unit. Hard (Portland cement) or coarsely
screened mortars may cause point loading and/or prevent the
outward migration of the water through the mortar joints, both
of which ultimately damage the terra-cotta unit. Repointing with
waterproof caulking compounds or similar waterproof materials
should never be undertaken because, like waterproof coatings,
they impede the normal outward migration of moisture through
the masonry joints. Moisture then may build sufficient pressure
behind the waterproof caulk and the glaze on the terra-cotta to
cause damage to the unit itself.
Repair of glaze spatting: Glaze spalling is also a highly
culpable source of water-related deterioration in glazed
architectural terra-cotta. It is important to coat or seal these
blistered areas and to prevent further entry of water into the
system by this route. All loose or friable material should be
removed. This may be done easily by hand; chisels or similar
small tools are most effective. The exposed material is then
painted over. At this time, no permanently effective reglazing
materials are available. However, there are several acrylic-
based proprietary products and masonry paints which can be
used effectively to protect these exposed areas, thus preventing
the entry of water. These materials are effective for 5 to 7 years
A worker cleans out mortar and can be reapplied. They also can be tinted to approximate
joints in preparation for closely the original glaze color.
repointing the architectural
terra-cotta photo: NPS files. Repair of minor material spatting: Minor material spalling,
where visual or cosmetic considerations are negligible, should be
treated in a manner similar to glaze spalling damage. That is, areas where small portions
of the body and glaze have spalled and which are far removed from close scrutiny (i.e.,
detailing on entablatures, upper story windows, etc.) are best remedied by painting with a
masonry paint or an acrylic-based proprietary product. Units on which material spalling is
easily observed (on the street level, door surrounds, etc.), and on which visual integrity is
a consideration, may be better replaced. Patching is not appropriate. Stucco-like or
cementitious buildups are difficult to form satisfactorily, safely and compatibly in situ to
replace missing pieces of glazed architectural terra-cotta. Cementitious repairs never
satisfactorily bond to the original material. The differential expansion coefficients of the two
materials (the repair and the original) preclude a safe, effective and long-term attachment.
Repair of major spatting: Glazed architectural terra-cotta units, which have spalled
severely thereby losing much of their material and structural integrity in the wall, should
be replaced. Partial in situ repair will not be long lasting and may, in fact, cause
complicated restoration problems at a later date. Appropriate methods of replacement are
discussed at a later point in this report.
Temporary stabilization: Stabilization measures are necessary when deterioration is so
severe as to create a situation where pieces of glazed architectural terra-cotta may fall
from the building. This is a particular concern with greatly exposed detailing: cornices,
balconies, balustrades, urns, columns, buttresses, etc. Restoration work on these pieces is
expensive and often must be carried on over a period of time. Unstable terra-cotta pieces
are often removed or destroyed in lieu of such measures. This is particularly true in areas
of heavy traffic-related vibrations or in earthquake zones. There are, however, less severe
measures which may be employed on a temporary basis. Substantial success has been
achieved in securing unstable glazed architectural terra-cotta pieces with metal strapping
and nylon net. While these measures should not be seen as permanent preservation
solutions, they do offer temporary alternatives to the wanton destruction of significant
glazed architectural terra-cotta detailing in the name of public safety and local code
compliance.
Repair of addition and structural damage:
Holes, sign anchors, slots for channel steel, or
structural cracking in the surface of glazed
architectural terra-cotta cladding should be
permanently sealed with a material that will
expand with the normal dynamics of the
surrounding material, yet effectively keep
water out of the system. Any one of a number
of commercially available waterproof caulking
compounds would be appropriate for this work.
Holes and static (non-moving) cracks may be
caulked with butyl sealants or acrylic latex
caulks. For dynamic (moving or active) cracks,
the polysulfide caulks are most often used,
although others may be safely employed. It is,
however, important to remember that these
waterproof caulking compounds are not viable This crack is being measured. Structural
repointing materials and should not be used as cracking, whether static (nonmoving)or
such. dynamic (moving) should be caulked to prevent
water entry into the glazed architectural terra-
Temporary replacement: Temporary cotta system. Photo: NPS files.
replacement measures should be implemented when missing units are scheduled to be
replaced but work cannot be undertaken immediately. Lengthy delivery time, prorating of
work or seasonal considerations may postpone replacement work. Severe deterioration
should at least be ameliorated until work can begin. Temporary repointing, removal and
saving of undamaged units to be reset later, or the temporary installation of brick infill to
retard further deterioration might be considered.
Removing earlier repairs: Removing earlier repairs may be necessary when the work
has either deteriorated or has become visually incompatible. Cementitious stucco,
caulkings with black bituminous compounds or brick repair work may become structurally
or visually unstable or incompatible and should be removed and properly rehabilitated.
Replacement of glazed architectural terra-cotta: Replacement of severely spalled,
damaged, or missing glazed architectural terra-cotta elements is always difficult. Certainly,
in-kind replacement is advisable, but it has a number of drawbacks. Stone, fiberglass, and
precast concrete are also viable choices, but like in-kind replacement, also have their
inherent problems.
Several notes on replacement: When replacing glazed architectural terra-cotta, all of the
original deteriorated material should be completely removed. Half bricks or similar
cosmetic replacement techniques are not advised.
-- When possible and where applicable, replacement units should be anchored in a manner
similar to the original. Both structural and visual compatibility are major considerations
when choosing replacement materials.
-- Removing and re-anchoring damaged glazed architectural terra-cotta is an extremely
difficult if not impossible task. The complexity of the interlocking system of masonry units,
backfill, and metal anchoring system precludes the removal of the glazed architectural
terra-cotta unit without destroying it.
-- Re-anchoring deteriorated units is likewise impossible. Therefore, if the terra-cotta in
question is loose, severely deteriorated, or its structural integrity in serious question, it is
best removed and replaced.
In-kind replacement is possible today, but only on a limited basis. Most new glazed
architectural terra-cotta is machine made, not hand made as the original. Thus, the porous
tile body of the new material tends to be more uniform but less dense and often not as
durable. The glaze on the new glazed architectural terra-cotta tends to be thinner than that
on the older material and subsequently more brittle. Machine processing has also produced
a glaze that is uniform in color as opposed to historic glazes which were slightly mottled
and, therefore, richer. Visual compatibility is an important consideration when replacing in-
kind.
Only a fairly limited inventory of in-kind pieces is presently available for replacement such
as plain ashlar blocks and the simpler details such as cappings and sills. When
deterioration severely damages the more ornate pieces (urns, cartouche work, balusters,
etc.) either expensive hand casting or alternative materials must be sought. There is a
tendency today to replace damaged ornamental work with simpler, cheaper and more
readily available units. This decision cannot, however, be supported, as the removal of this
work inevitably diminishes the character and integrity of the building. Another major
consideration in choosing in-kind replacement is the question of delivery time, which is
often quite lengthy. If new glazed architectural terra-cotta is chosen as a replacement
material, the architect or building owner should plan far in advance.
Stone may be a suitable replacement material for damaged glazed architectural terra-
cotta. Its durability makes it highly appropriate, although the increase in weight over the
original hollow units may be of some concern. The fact that historic glazed architectural
terra-cotta was glazed in imitation of stone, however, may make the choice of stone as a
replacement material a fortuitous one. Metal anchoring may be accommodated easily in the
carving. Cost, however, is the major drawback in stone replacement, particularly where
rich detailing must be carved to match the original.
Fiberglass replacement is a viable alternative, particularly when rich and elaborate
ornamentation has to be duplicated. Casting from original intact pieces can produce
numerous sharp copies of entablatures, moldings, balusters, voussoirs, etc. Anchoring is
easily included in casting.
Significant drawbacks in using fiberglass replacement are color compatibility, fire code
violations, and poor weathering and aging processes. The appropriate coloring of fiberglass
is exceedingly difficult in many instances. Painting is often unsatisfactory, as it discolors at
a rate different than that of the historic glazed original. While fiberglass casting is lighter
than the original units and, therefore, of great interest in the rehabilitation of buildings in
areas of high seismic activity, many fire code requirements cannot be met with the use of
this material.
Precast concrete units show great promise in replacing glazed architectural terra-cotta at
this writing. Precast concrete units can, like fiberglass, replicate nuances of detail in a
modular fashion: they can also be cast hollow, use lightweight aggregate and be made to
accommodate metal anchoring when necessary. Concrete can be colored or tinted to match
the original material with excellent results. It is cost effective and once production is in
process, precast concrete call be produced quickly and easily.
Experience shows that it is advisable to use a clear masonry coating on the weather face of
the precast concrete units to guarantee the visual compatibility of the new unit, to prevent
moisture absorption, to obtain the proper reflectivity in imitation of the original glaze and
to prevent weathering of the unit itself. Precast concrete replacement units are presently
enjoying great use in replicating historic glazed architectural terra-cotta and show promise
for future rehabilitation programs.
Once the replacement material is selected (new glazed architectural terra-cotta. stone,
precast concrete, or fiberglass), it must be reanchored into the masonry system. Original
metal anchoring came in numerous designs, materials and coatings ranging from
bituminous-coated iron to bronze. While most of these anchors are no longer available,
they may be easily replicated in large quantities either in the original material when
appropriate or out of more durable and available metals such as stainless steel.
Since the masonry backfill is already in place in the historic building, the new replacement
unit with anchoring may simply be fitted into the existing backfill by boring a hole or slot
for anchor and bedding the anchor and the unit itself in mortar. When replacing historic
glazed architectural terra-cotta which originally employed metal anchoring, it is important
to replace that anchoring when replacing the unit. Serious problems may result if
anchoring is omitted in restoration, when it was used originally. It is erroneous to assume
that mortar alone will be sufficient to hold these replacement pieces in place.
Summary
Today, many of this country's buildings are constructed of glazed architectural terra-cotta.
However, many of these are in a state of serious deterioration and decay. Glazed
architectural terra-cotta was, in many ways, the "wonder" material of the American
building industry in the late 19th century and during the first decades of the 20th century.
New technology and methods of rehabilitation now hold promise for the restoration and
rehabilitation of these invaluable and significant resources. Restoration/rehabilitation work
on glazed architectural terra-cotta is demanding and will not tolerate halfway measures.
Today's preservation work should equal the spirit, attention to detail, pride in workmanship
and care which characterized the craftsmanship associated with this widely used, historic
masonry material.
Suggested Further Readings
"Recipes for Baked Earth." Progressive Architecture (November, 1977).
McIntyre, W.A. Investigations into the Durability of Architectural Terra Cotta. Special
Report 12. London: Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Building Research
Station, 1929.
Prudon, Theodore H.M. "Architectural Terra-cotta: Analyzing the Deterioration Problems
and Restoration Approaches." Technology and Conservation, Vol. 3 (Fall, 1978), pp. 30-38.
Prudon, Theodore H.M. Terra Cotta as a Building Material. A Bibliography. Ottawa, Ontario:
Association for Preservation Technology, 1976.
Acknowledgements
This Preservation Brief was written by de Teel Patterson Tiller,Architectural Historian,Technical Preservation Services
Division. Information for this publication was based in part upon interviews and consultation with Theodore H.M.
Prudon,The Ehrenkrantz Group, P.C., New York, New York. Additional comments and information were provided by Si
A. Bortz, Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois, and Jerry G. Stockbridge, Wiss,Janney,
Elstner, and Associates, Northbrook, Illinois.
Washington, D.C. June, 1979
Home page logo:Terra-cotta detail on the Adams Hotel,Tulsa, Oklahoma. Photo: NPS files.
This publication has been prepared pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act of
1966, as amended, which directs the Secretary of the Interior to develop and make
available information concerning historic properties. Technical Preservation Services (TPS),
Heritage Preservation Services Division, National Park Service prepares standards,
guidelines, and other educational materials on responsible historic preservation treatments
for a broad public.
Preservation Briefs I Questions
KDW