Loading...
02-343 Resolution No. 02-343 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A FIRST AMENDED FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH THE BEN G. CORN TRUST (53-63 Douglas Avenue) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, that Olufemi Folarin, Interim City Manager, and Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk, be and are hereby authorized and directed to execute a First Amended Facade Improvement Program Agreement on behalf of the City of Elgin with the Ben G. Corn Trust for the property commonly known as 53-63 Douglas Avenue, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference . s/ Ed Schock Ed Schock, Mayor Presented: October 23 , 2002 Adopted: October 23 , 2002 Omnibus Vote : Yeas : 7 Nays : 0 Attest : s/ Dolonna Mecum Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk FIRST AMENDED FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 3o77-1 day of d c7r O13 G/Z , 2002, by and between the City of Elgin, Illinois, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City") , and Ben G Corn Trust, dated May 1, 1995, the property owner, (hereinafter referred to as "Owner") . WHEREAS, City has established a facade improvement program (hereinafter referred to as "Program") for application within certain areas of the corporate limits of City designated by City as appropriate for such application (hereinafter referred to as "Rehabilitation Areas") ; and WHEREAS, Program is administered and funded solely by City for purposes of the control and prevention of blight, dilapidation and deterioration of Rehabilitation Areas; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Program, City has undertaken to share the cost of facade improvements to certain structures within Rehabilitation Area, pursuant to the criteria set forth herein; and WHEREAS, Owner owns at least 50% of subject commercial building (s) , or is the tenant of commercial building (s) located within Rehabilitation Area, with Owner having provided the Owner's consent and authority to participate in Program pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto have previously entered into a Fagade Improvement Program Agreement, dated May 22 , 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "Original Agreement" ) ; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Original Agreement to reflect revised costs and scope of work. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows : Section 1 . The project work and costs therefor for the structure referred to at Section 16 herein shall be in two phases, as set forth in Attachment A hereto. Owner shall not be required to utilize the contractors listed in Attachment A. City shall pay Owner the sum of $38, 198 . 50 for Phase I, being 50% of the total eligible costs, which is comprised of $26, 738 . 95 for facade reimbursement, and $11, 459 . 55 as an economic development incentive grant; and $29, 837 . 50 for Phase II, being 35% of the total eligible costs. The project shall be confined to approved improvements made to that part of the structure visible from any public right-of-way. All parties hereto agree that all payments from the City provided for herein shall be made to Owner, who shall provide the City with a full release upon receipt . Section 2 . Eligible costs shall include labor, material and equipment costs, and such other costs as may be reasonably necessary for the execution and completion of the facade improvement hereby provided for (hereinafter referred to as the "Work") , as designated from the design drawings and specifications approved by the Project Review Team pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 herein and prepared by Consultant (hereinafter referred to as "Plans") . Section 3 . No Work shall be undertaken or shall be considered to constitute the basis for an Eligible Cost until the design for such Work has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Project Review Team, consisting of the City's Urban Design and Preservation Specialist and City's Principal Planner, and any other member designated on the Project Review Team. Such design shall include, but not be limited to, a date certain by which the Work shall be completed. In no event shall such Work be completed more than one hundred eighty (180) days from the date of this Agreement, without the written consent of the Project Review Team. Section 4 . The Project Review Team shall be permitted access to Structure to periodically review the progress of the Work. Such review shall not be in lieu of any other inspections which may otherwise be required by law or by City. Any and all portions of the Work which do not, in the sole discretion of the Project Review Team, conform to the Plans or other applicable terms of this Agreement, shall be made to conform to the Plans and other applicable Terms of this Agreement upon written notice of the existence of such non-conforming portions . Section 5 . Upon completion of the Work, and upon final inspection and written approval by the Project Review Team and such other final inspections and approvals as may be required by law, Owner shall submit to City: (1) an executed, notarized itemized contractor statement reflecting the total cost of the Work and each portion thereof, including, but not limited to, the cost of labor (whether provided by any contractor or subcontractor) , materials and equipment; (2) copies of all bids, contracts and invoices submitted, executed or incurred pursuant to the Work; and (3) reasonable proof of payment of all costs incurred pursuant to the Work. All work shall be completed within a reasonable time as determined by City in City' s sole discretion. City may provide partial payments upon the completion of discrete items of work in each phase in City' s sole discretion as determined by City' s historic preservation specialist upon such terms as City' s historic preservation specialist may require. Section 6 . City shall pay to Owner the sum provided for at Section 1 herein within thirty (30) days of Owner's compliance with the provisions of Section 5 herein. In no event shall the amount paid to Owner exceed the amount specified in this Agreement or in the contractor statement . Section 7 . In the event Owner fails to complete the Work in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, or otherwise breaches 2 the terms of this Agreement, City may terminate this Agreement upon written notice of breach and termination to Owner, and any and all financial or other obligations on the part of City shall cease and become null and void. Section 8 . Upon completion of the Work, and for a period of five (5) years thereafter, Owner shall properly maintain the Work in its finished form, without alteration or change thereto, and shall not enter into any agreement, or take any other steps to alter, change or remove such Work, or to create or undertake any other Work which may constitute a deviation from the Plans, without prior written approval from the Project Review Team in its sole discretion. Section 9 . Nothing herein is intended to limit, restrict or prohibit the Owner from undertaking any other Work in or about the subject premises which is unrelated to the facade improvement provided for in this Agreement . Section 10 . This Agreement shall be binding upon City and its successors, and upon Owner, Owner's successors and assigns for a period of five (5) years from and after the date of completion and approval of the Work. Owner shall provide subsequent Owner (s) of Structure with a copy of this Agreement . This Agreement shall run with the land underlying Structure . Section 11 . If Owner does not own the underlying property for which Work is being done, Owner warrants and represents to City that Owner has a lease at the location for which the Work is proposed for a term of at least six (6) years . Owner further warrants and represents that he has received authorization from all owners of the property for which Work is to be done to accept funds under this program and to undertake the Work. Further, such owner (s) of the property for which Work is to be done hereby acknowledges that he is aware of this Agreement and authorized the Work which is to be made to the Structure. Said owner (s) of the property for which improvements are to be made further acknowledge that, as owner of the property, he is a party to this Agreement and is bound by the provisions of this Agreement specifically, but not limited to, the provisions of Section 6 of this Agreement . Each "Owner" signature hereto hereby warrants and represents that there are no other entities having an ownership interest in the Structure, which have not executed this Agreement . Section 12 . Owner hereby holds harmless and indemnifies City from and against any and all causes of action, suits, claims for damages, and any and all other liability, which may arise out of or in connection with Owner's or Owner's agents, employees and assigns' negligent performance of any of the terms of this Agreement . To the fullest extent permitted by law, Owner agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees, boards and commissions from and against any and all claims, suits, judgments, costs, attorney' s fees, damages or other relief arising 3 out of or resulting from or through or alleged to arise out of any reckless or negligent acts or omissions of Owner, Owner' s employees or agents in the performance of this agreement . In the event of any action against the City, its officers, employees, agents, boards or commissions covered by the foregoing duty to indemnify, defend and hold harmless, such action shall be defended by legal counsel of the City' s choosing. Section 13 . This Agreement shall not be construed to create a partnership, joint venture, employment or other agency relationship of any kind between the parties hereto. Section 14 . This Agreement shall be subject to and governed by the laws of the State of Illinois . The parties hereto hereby agree that venue for any and all actions which may be brought by each and either of them to enforce the provisions of this Agreement shall be in the Circuit Court of Kane County, Illinois . Section 15 . The terms of this Agreement shall be severable . In the event that any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement are deemed to be void or otherwise unenforceable for any reason, the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect . Section 16 . Owner's Name : Ben G. Corn Trust, Dated May 1, 1995 Address : 103 N Jane Drive City: Elgin, IL 60123 Telephone Number: (847) 888-3414 Property Location: 53-63 Douglas Avenue Ownership Interest : Property owner Contact Person: Bruce Corn, Diane Stredde Section 17 . This agreement shall amend and supersede the Original Agreement between the parties hereto in all respects . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first appearing above . As to CITY OF ELGIN: As to OWNER: By: .� By: to 16t,-v e� Olufemi o-lari Ben G. Corn Trust, Interim nager Dated May 1, 1995 Trustee/Property Owner ATTEST: Dolonna Mecum, ity Clerk F:\Legal Dept\Agreement\FacadeImprovementProgram-53-63 Douglas-Corn 1st Amendment.doc 4 Attachment A Work Item Contractor#1 Contractor#2 Contractor#3 Contractor#4 Phase I amended Removal of Asset Recovery 12,593.00 American 18,250.00 Exterior Contracting, Demolition Aluminum LLC Corporation New window Pella Windows 37,168.71 David Wayne 46,300.00 Woodland 63,804.00 Seigle's 72,125.00 installation. and doors(does Carpenter Windows and not include contractors(does doors installation) not meet material specification) Total I 1- 76,397.00 City's Participation: 50%as originally agreed upon: $38,198.50 Phase II (proposed) Cinder block Applewood 4,650.00 Maninger 4,715.00 Walter 18,000.00 removal Construction Grzebieniak, Building Maintenance Inc. Exterior Seyller's 36,800.00 Applewood 43,090.00 Walter 47,370.00 masonry Tuckpointing and Construction Grzebieniak, cleaning& Masonry (cleaning)and Building tuckpointing Maninger Maintenance Inc. tuc ointin Cornice and Albert J. Wagner 43,800.00 Bay repair &Son, Sheet metal contractors total 85,250.00 City's Participation: Option 1 at 35%:29,837.50(recommended by staff) Option 2 at 50%:42,625.00 Committee of the Whole - August 14 , 2002 Page 3 recently entered into with the police collective bargaining unit relating to discipline . The proposed amendments would also result in the non-bargaining unit officers being subject to the same disciplinary procedures as other city management employees . The proposed changes were discussed, and Chief Miller indicated that the deputy chiefs have expressed a desire to continue having the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners have discipline authority for the non-bargaining unit employees . Several Councilmembers stated they believe that since the police non-bargaining unit employees are management, they should be subject to the procedures outlined in the proposed ordinance, which is the procedure for all other management employees . Upon a roll call vote : Yeas : Councilmembers Gilliam, Munson, Walters, Wasilowski and Mayor Schock. Nays : Councilmembers Figueroa and Yearman. Consideration of Solid Waste Contract Payments with Waste Management for Addition of New Household Counts Councilmember Gilliam made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Figueroa, to authorize an increase in the number of single- family household stops by 21, for a total of 20 , 257 units, which will remain in effect through September 30, 2002 and authorize payment for 43 additional multi-family units for a total of 3 , 676 units, through September 30, 2002 . Upon a roll call vote : Yeas : Councilmembers Figueroa, Gilliam, Munson, Walters, Wasilowski, Yearman and Mayor Schock. Nays : None . Consideration of a Request for Additional Funding for a Facade Improvement Proiect for 53-63 Douglas Avenue Discussion was held regarding the fact that the Corn Family believed the City would be funding the entire facade project at the 50 percent level . However, the City' s facade improvement guidelines provide for maximum funding of 35 percent . The 50 percent approved for Phase I included 35 percent for facade improvement plus an additional 15 percent for economic development incentive contingent upon the property owner signing a lease agreement with Quiznos, and it is the City' s that it the balance of the project would be funded at the 35 percent level in accordance with the facade program guidelines . The Corn Family indicated that the project would not move forward unless the City provides 50 percent of the funding. Councilmembers expressed a desire to see the project completed and discussed other possible programs that could assist in financing this project . Mayor Schock suggested that consideration be given to Committee of the Whole - August 14 , 2002 Page 4 whether the loan assistance program could be restructured to see if the difference in funding could be made up through that program. Councilmember Wasilowski made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Gilliam, to amend Phase I of the proposed project at 50 percent as originally agreed upon and approve Phase II at 35 percent, per the program guidelines, for total City participation amounting to $68, 036, and to examine ways to provide additional economic assistance for the project . Upon a roll call vote : Yeas : Councilmembers Figueroa, Gilliam, Munson, Walters, Wasilowski, Yearman and Mayor Schock. Nays : None . Adj ourrnment Councilmember Gilliam made a motion, seconded by Councilmember Figueroa, to adjourn and go into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing the following matters : Collective Bargaining Issues or Deliberations Concerning Salary Schedules for One or More Classes of Employees - Exempt Under Section 120/2 (c) (2) of the Open Meetings Act Purchase or Lease of Real Property for the Use of the Public Body - Exempt Under Section 120/2 (c) (5) of the Open Meetings Act Selection of a Person to Fill a Vacant Office, or Removal of a Person from an Office, When the Public Body has the Power to do so by Law or Ordinance - Exempt Under Section 120/2 (c) (3) of the Open Meetings Act Pending, or Probable or Imminent Litigation Against, Affecting, or on Behalf of the Public Body Before a Court or Administrative Tribunal - Exempt Under Section 120/2 (c) (11) of the Open Meetings Act The meeting adjourned at 6 : 56 p.m. August 28 , 2002 Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk Date Approved City of Elgin Agenda Item No. K_ August 9, 2002 ECONOMIC GROWTH TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Olufemi Folarin, Interim City Manager SUBJECT: 53-63 Douglas Avenue - Facade Improvement Project Amendment of Phase I and Approval of Phase II of the project PURPOSE The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the Mayor and members of the City Council with information to consider an amendment of Phase I and approval of Phase II of the facade improvement project at the above property. BACKGROUND In 1999, the architectural firm of Dahlquist and Lutzow was contacted by the City to draw up the plans for the project . The architect provided drawings and a probable estimate for the removal of the non-original aluminum cladding as well as restoration of the entire west facade. The total cost of the entire project was estimated at $391, 500 . 00 . Due to the magnitude of the project, the property owners proposed to complete it in phases . Phase I (April 2002) In April 2002, the property owner had approached the Elgin City Council with a request for funds to remove the non-original aluminum facade and install new windows . Funds for the project were approved and the work had begun. Funding had been provided in the form of a 35 percent facade improvement grant ($17, 882 . 55) with an additional 15 percent economic development incentive ($7, 663 . 95) contingent upon the property owner signing a lease agreement with Quiznos. The property owner was informed that the 50 percent funding assistance, for a total of $25, 546. 50 would only be for this first phase of the project . All future funding to the Corn Family for the facade would be at 35 percent . Facade Improvement Additional Funding - 53-63 Douglas August 9, 2002 Page 2 To date, the only work completed at this time is the removal of the non-original aluminum siding on the west fagade of the building. The windows have not been replaced since the selected window supplier has gone out of business. Additional cost estimates from new window suppliers have since been provided to the City for consideration. The property owners are requesting an amendment to Phase I of the project with a consideration of the current cost estimates for the window replacement work. The accepted bid that meets the recommendations of the project architect, John Roberson, and staff is $76, 397 . 00 . The City' s participation of 50 percent, as originally agreed upon, would now amount to $38, 198 . 50, an increase of $12 , 651 . 50 over the $25, 546 . 50 approved in April . Phase II (Current) Phase II, currently being requested for consideration, includes the following: 1 . Removal of the cinderblock from the window openings on the upper stories of the fagade to allow for the reinstallation of the new windows. 2 . Exterior chemical cleaning and tuckpointing of the brick and stone masonry on the west fagade. This work is currently being completed on the west fagade. 3 . Repair of decorative metal molding on the cornice and bay windows . This phase is being submitted with components of the current phase - masonry cleaning and tuckpointing, and metal molding - being retroactively requested for funding. Staff had determined that the ongoing work on the fagade was in keeping with the guidelines of the program. The construction crews were set up on site and work was in progress. In order not to interrupt the momentum of the project, staff recommended that the ongoing work be allowed to continue rather than be halted until consideration by the Elgin City Council in August . Currently only one bid for the restoration of the metal molding work has been submitted by the property owner. Due to the very unique and specialized nature of this type of work, it is difficult to obtain additional bids from contractors. Facade Improvement Additional Funding - 53-63 Douglas August 9, 2002 Page 3 However, staff and the project architect have reviewed the submitted bid and determined that it meets the guidelines of the program. The total cost of the current phase as outlined above is $85,250 . 00 . The City' s allocation at 35 percent would amount to $29, 837. 50 . However, the Corn family is requesting that the funding for phase II of the project be similar to phase I, set at 50 percent of the total project cost . At 50 percent, the City' s participation would be $42, 625 . 00 . The total allocations of phase I and II (as recommended by staff) are about one-half the total amount that the City could potentially participate in this project . The Facade Improvement Program guidelines allow a maximum participation by the City not to exceed $150, 000 . 00 per project . As we previously reported, it is anticipated that the property P Y owner will continue to request the City' s participation in the program for future phases of the project . COMMUNITY GROUPS/INTERESTED PERSONS CONTACTED None. �fFNANCIAL IMPACT ndment of Phase I (April 2002) Approval of the amendment of Phase I at the 50 percent level as originally agreed upon would amount to $38, 198 .50 . Phase II (Current) Approval of phase II at 35 percent, per the program guidelines, would amount to $29, 837 . 50 . As an alternative, approval of phase II at 50 percent, as requested by the property owner, would amount to $42, 625 . 00 . The 2002 budget for this account number totals $130, 500. Approximately $84, 000 is still available. Facade Improvement Additional Funding - 53-63 Douglas August 9, 2002 Page 4 There is sufficient funding available in account number 350- 0000-795. 78-99, project number 079817, to fund both Phase I and Phase II (either at 35 or 50 percent) . LEGAL IMPACT revised agreement between the property owner, Ben G. Corn VMI---"Trust, and the City of Elgin will need to be prepared. ALTERNATIVES 1 . Amend Phase I of the project at 50 percent as originally agreed upon, and approve Phase II at 35 percent, per the program guidelines, for a total City participation amounting to $68, 036 . 00 . 2 . Amend Phase I of the project at 50 percent as originally agreed upon, and approve Phase II at 50 percent, as currently requested by the property owner, for a total City participation amounting to 80, 823 . 50 . 2 . Reject the request to amend Phase I and fund phase II of the project . RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve alternative 1 - to Amend Phase I of the project at 50 percent as originally agreed upon, and approve Phase II at 35 percent, per the program guidelines, for a total City participation amounting to $68, 036 . 00 . Respectfully submitted, Olufemi F arin Interi C ' y nager SBS/sm Attachment f(eViScd. o City of Elgin Agenda Item No. /VA filI Ito J) April 19, 2002 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council ALIVE DOWNTOWN FROM: Olufemi Folarin, Interim City Manager SUBJECT: Facade Project for the McBride Building at 53-63 Douglas Avenue Owned by Ben Corn PURPOSE The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the Mayor and members of the City Council with information to consider a facade improvement project for the McBride Building located at 53-63 Douglas Avenue. BACKGROUND The owner of the property, Ben Corn, represented by his son Bruce Corn and daughter Diane Stredde, wishes to participate in the Facade Improvement Program. The McBride Building, located at 53-63 Douglas Avenue, is a significant example of Elgin's downtown commercial buildings built at the turn of the last century. The building originally had a highly ornamented brick masonry front facade with large storefront windows at street level, Chicago Style bay windows on the upper levels topped off with a decorative cornice with triangular ornamental pediments . In the 1970s, the building was clad in aluminum siding necessitating the removal of much of the decorative masonry and cornice details . All windows on the front elevation were covered over with the aluminum cladding and the storefronts were reconfigured to allow for the new cladding. In 1999, the property owner approached the City with an intent to participate in the Facade Improvement Program. At that time, the architectural firm of Dahlquist and Lutzow was contacted by the City to draw up the plans for the project . The architect provided drawings and a probable estimate for the removal of the non- original aluminum cladding as well as restoration of the entire west facade . However, the property owner did not proceed with the project due to the high cost of restoring the entire west facade ($391 , 500) . The property owner has since been approached by Downtown Elgin Subs, Inc. , d.b.a. Quizno's Restaurant, to lease a portion of the building. As a condition of entering into a lease with the Corn family, Quizno' s Restaurant is requiring that the metal facade of the building be removed. Facade Project at 53-63 Douglas Avenue April 19, 2002 Page 2 In order to accommodate the restaurant in the building, the property owner is proposing a partial restoration of the west (front) facade of the building. The currently proposed work to the facade involves removal of the exterior aluminum cladding and reinstallation of the windows on the facade . At this time, the property owner has not indicated an intent to clean and tuckpoint the exterior brick masonry, restore any architectural features on the facade, or carry out any work to the existing storefronts. The facade must be removed in order to assess the condition of the brick, tuchpoint and original architectural features. The property owner is only requesting funding for removal of the aluminum siding and installation of windows . Staff recognizes that additional work on the facade will need to be carried out on removal of the cladding and determination of the condition of the underlying brick masonry. Future participation of the City on the project will be subject to review by staff and approval by the City Council . The estimated project cost for the currently proposed work is $51, 093 . 00 . The Corn family is requesting that the funding for this first phase of the facade project be set at 50 percent (35 percent as a part of the Facade Program and 15 percent as an inducement for the restaurant to locate in the building, all payable to the Corn Family) . At 50 percent, the funding from the City would be $25, 546 . 50 . If the Mayor and members of the City Council choose to fund the first phase of the project at the 50 percent level, 35 percent of the project cost could be secured through the facade program, and 15 percent would be funded under the Economic Development Incentives Fund. The 50 percent funding assistance would only be for this first phase of the project . All future funding to the Corn Family for the facade would be at 35 percent . COMMUNITY GROUPS/INTERESTED PERSONS CONTACTED Elgin Heritage Commission. FINANCIAL IMPACT Approval of the partial facade project for 53-63 Douglas Avenue at the 35 percent level would equal approximately $17, 882 . 55 . There is sufficient funding available in the program account 350-0000- 795 . 78-99, project number 079817, to fund the project . There is sufficient funding available in the Economic Development Incentives Fund, account number 276-0000-791 . 80-27 to provide the remaining $7, 663 . 95 . LEGAL IMPACT An agreement between the City of Elgin and property owner at 53-63 Douglas Avenue will be required. Facade Project at 53-63 Douglas Avenue April 19, 2002 Page 3 ALTERNATIVES 1 . Approve the request by Ben Corn for participation in the Facade Improvement Program with the additional requested funding. 2 . Reject the request to proceed with the project . RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the request to proceed with the facade improvement project for 53-63 Douglas Avenue be approved in the amount of $25, 546 . 50 . Respectfully submitted, O mi lari ' Interim ' ty Ma ager SBS/sm Attachments Attachment A Work Item Contractor#1 Contractor#2 Removal of Exterior American Demolition $18,250.00 Asset Recovery $12,593.00 Aluminum Co oration Contracting,LLC Aluminum Windows David Wayne Carpenter $39,900.00 Window Outlet $38,500.00 and Frames Contractors,Inc. Totals $58,150.00 $51,093.00 01-06-01 11:33am From-AFRICAN DEMOLITION COPORATION 8476080060 T-924 P.03/03 F-723 � t H AMERICAN OEM OLITION CORPORATION CORPORATE OFFICE:305 Ramona Avenue -Elgin, IL.60120- Phone 847-608-0010- FAX 847-60a-0060 July 6,2001 Lamp,Inc. 460 N.Grove Elgin,IL 60120 Attn:Greg Phone: (847)741-7220 ext.309 Fax: (847)741-9677 Re: r Elgin, American Demolition Corporation proposes to furnish labor, material and legal disposal for demolition/removal of areas and items per the following scopes of work. krmolition/Removal • Demolition/removal of the metal fascia at rho above referenced location(Approx.4,000 SF). -Demolition includes the small 5'retums on the north and south. • ADC has included necessary perrnits/sidewalk closures for our work. • Demolition debris to be hauled and legally disposed off site. • All salvage to become the property of American Demolition after structures are released for demolition. Items Not Included in Our Scope of Work -Removal of asbestos or any other hazardous/special wastes. -Utility disconnection and/or rerouting. The above work will be accomplished Respectfully submitted, AMERICAN DEMOLITION CORPORATION William R.Beaman Vice President C:\WRB Documents\Proposals\200I\010416.0l.doc t t<E(- VERY CONTA • PAGE 01/02 ASSETRECOVERY CONTRACTING L.L.C. ► 5449 Fargo Ave, Skokie,Illinois 60077.3211 Phone 847.674.3366 Fax 847,674.8660 arcdemo.com July 20, 2001 Mr_Earl Lamp Lamp Incorporated 'Transmit via facsimile: 460 North Grove Avenue Phone: 847-741-7220 Elgin,'Illinois 60120 Fax= 847-741-9677 subject; 53-63 Douglas,Elgin: Proposal for Metal Favade Removal Dear Mr. Lamp: We are pleased to offer this proposal for removing the aluminum frame.This proposal is based u m f pon: acade along with its steel support O Our site visit on Thursday, 7/19/01. and the terms outlined below: L REMO'UAL FORK s Selective Demolition for the facade 1- Aluminum panels and mullions. 57's including 2. Steel support f-jmework 3. Cut anchor bolts approximately flush with the face of the existing brick exteri or. 4. Suspended ITEMS ceiling system, lighting, and conduits at the base of the fagade. X• WORK ITEMS nor i eluded• A. xceraoval of bolt anchors. B. Tuckpointing C. Genera]; • Dust protection for building interior- (W e closed by others and remain closed during ome exterior windows and Openings will be • Temporary water and electric. g the demolition-) • der Protection. • g/Restoration work. No finish cuts or fill. • Asbestos,PCB's or other hazardous materials removals, or work that would expose ARC Per - Items to asbestos or other environmental contaminants. • Items to be saved, salvaged relocated, or re-used >�. ACCESS/EGRESS A. Removal,hauhng�dumpsters, and legal di B. Debris will be removed and loaded m o dewi stersf debris is included in our price. p positioned in the curb lane. M. BILLINGS&PAYMENTS A. BILMN6 BREAKDOWN pI-o,� ►rill be invoiced in full. IV. SCHEDULE: upon completion of the work. . Work will proceed on a single-shift strai B. This ro ght time basis,Monday through Fri . p posal is based upon a schedule duration of three days. y C The pri ces are based upon release of the entire work scope at once, for continuous unimpeded demolition in a single.mobilization. , peeled Page 1 of 2 ASSET RECoVERy CONTA ----- PAGE 02/02 ARC Proposal to Lamp becorporated 53-63 Douglas Elg:U: FaVade Removal July 20, 2001 V. PRICE; The sum of Twelve'Thousand Five hundred Ninety 711ree Dollars(S 12,593.00) This Proposal remains arm for your acceptance for sixty(60) days, and is based on incorporation of ex- isting subcontract terms and conditions_ We trust that the above responds to your inquiry. would like to discuss or clarify If you have questions, need further information, or lime,we appreciate our interest TW iteans, please contact us at your earliest convenience. In the mean- Y interest in our fwtu,and we look forward to serving Your needs. Sincerely, VpnLlhone:. Wemer 773-4.91-1241 (2,j e Jim @arcdemo.com Page 2 of 2 - FROM :' S EDGE FAX N0. :18477425211 Mar. 27 2002 07:29AM PI Avid CAR ENTCR CONTizACiQRS INC. A"Nr I>bu-GA Ill�)ts t'.vrkH1�� l.f<;iv, II bt)173 ll>t�ovt) IYt/�t1-►5y1 (fuc) i;-tY-606- t33 March is,2002 The Razors Edge Attn:Bruce Si Douglas Avemn 'Elgin,IL 60123 RE:The McRA&BuildiattC 53=63,Douglas A"Mme,ir,Wn,-]L. . Sid Yacladear Ian aatBrusbed Aluminum-Windows Frames A W Glass g3econd&Ttilitd-fFloots oa. .. WeS Side of - • S�Cdl1�1pt0U�� A1t�iirumf18roee X72+E`5�71�:� :aearrirra►Y�fd�YiYk..r�_ +c+tt::.�:::x5[ (1) Dumpster @ 30 yards included Bid Does Not behoft Sttalned Glass or Colored Glass Access or Building Permits for rob, Burkading of Wallmay< Demolition or Ren oval of Existing Windows S"1960-00 OPTIONS: F Colored Aluminum In Place of Bn*W Aluminum $3,400.00 Aluminum Capping NRognircd Due lo Exposed Timber,Brashed $$,4,10.00 Colored $6,400.00 ****NOTE:This Proposal specifies the use of Aluminum Windows.Our rttooUM endefion is the use of Ahnnimrm due to the retp nW sixes and the increased strength when oompered to a vinyl Window.We do not feet Vmyl is a suitable option fir windows of this size.**•• PAC G IS NOT GUARA njjR f P POSAL IS IYOT ACCIt=MM 3o•2AYS We hereby PROPOM ID hrmsh labor and material--completely in agre moat with the above 6 O0MS for,the:som of$39,W.00. Payment to be made ss fdbws:40%Regednd Upw Sftft '����ft*drery-Bsdaucc - . _ Withis 10 Days Of Invaim ANY LEGAL OR COLLECTION FEE.PAYABLE BY AD SEE.�A11'" work to be completed in a substaunlal work tt rower according to the spCcificadons sabmiWd per standard practioes.Any Alteration or deviation Dom above specifications involving elnta labor will be c►oeeobed only Won written orders,and will become an extra charge over sad above the estimaw at M&M per mar-inor. Extra work orders fiwjab5ibw incurred due to material availability. Owner is to carry Ste,tornado and =Vol"'One wo►is ees folly covered by Worker's Cron Ise. David Alexander,M m AMPTANCE Oir PROPOSAL'—The*m prices,specifications and conditions are safisthctory and are Eby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as aspecified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Date Of Aco*tance Authorized Signature WINDOW OUTLET ce( 317 South 2nd St. (Rte.31) PHONE: 630-377-2938 St. Charles,IL 60174 FAX: 630-377-2943 38 Z 0-17- 3(�7� CASH SALES CONTRACT DATE: r / Z`j'/200 Z Tdow Outlet Inc.(Contractor)agrees to furnish all materials necessary to do modernization work and improvements on the premises located at to address listed below under the following terms and conditions. r )WNER'S NAME S �� ►DDRESS PHONE z I %IN , IL ZIP CODE 60_ 2 he utxlersi ned Contract r ag ees furnish the following materials improvements and/or services:ta G eS '7L c UX)D bY- S• J honer agrees to pay Contractor for all material and services to be furnished by Contractor to Owner,under the terms of this contract. UI for the sum of $ Total Due 'ayment 1/3 down 3 $ Deposit )ue at start of work 3 $ At Start )ue at substantial completion $ At Substantial Completion' Substantial Completion is Installation Complete; Products are Under Warranty. Seiler warrants workmanship for two years after date of completion and will remedy substantial defects on written notice from buyer within such two year period. Us contract shag become effective unless notified In writing within thirty days by an authorized officer of Window Outlet. Ids contract contains the entire understanding and agreement between the parties and no verbal agreements or changes are to be recognized. iuyer(s)represents he owns property on which work Is to be furnished. Seger shag not be liable for delays caused by strikes,weather conditions,delay in obtaining goods or other causes beyond its control. ou,the Buyer may cancel this transaction at any time prior to midnight of the third business day after the date of this transaction. Contractor is not responsible for conditions or manstarces beyond its control Including condensation resulting from or due to pre-existing conditions. Painting,staining,or redecorating is not included in this contrail. 'ayment is due In full upon'completion of Installation as described above. Late fees will begin to accrue If payment in fug Is not received within thirty days of completion date.An vms remaining unpaid after completion shag bear Interest at the rate of 2.00%per month,or fraction thereof. >twuld the buyer fag to pay in full as provided herein upon delivery.they will be responsible for court costs,costs of litigation,and reasonable attomey s fees incurred in the on any past due amounts. )ATE r �i ,200 OWNER NINDOW UTLET(CONTRACT R) 3Y: OWNER REPRES ATIVE)