02-184 r
Resolution No. 02-184
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT WITH ENSR CORPORATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
SERVICES FOR SOUTH GROVE AVENUE SITES
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN,
ILLINOIS, that pursuant to Elgin Municipal Code Section
5 . 02 . 020B (9) the City Council hereby finds that an exception to the
requirements of the procurement ordinance is necessary and in the
best interests of the city; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Olufemi Folarin, Interim City
Manager, and Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk, be and are hereby
authorized and directed to execute an Amendment to Professional
Services Agreement on behalf of the City of Elgin with ENSR
Corporation for environmental services at Festival Park, Crocker
Theatre and South Grove Avenue sites, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof by reference .
s/ Ed Schock
Ed Schock, Mayor
Presented: May 22 , 2002
Adopted: May 22 , 2002
Omnibus Vote : Yeas : 7 Nays : 0
Attest :
s/ Dolonna Mecum
Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk
City of Elgin Agenda Item No.
p _
April 19, 2002
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Olufemi Folarin, Interim City Manager ECONOMIC GROWTH
SUBJECT: Proposal for Environmental Testing at
Festival Park, the Crocker Theater
and the South Grove Townhome Site
PURPOSE
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the Mayor and members
of the City Council with information on a proposal from ENSR
International for environmental testing and oversight services at
Festival Park, the Crocker Theater site, and the South Grove
Townhome site .
BACKGROUND
On February 13 , 2002 , the City Council authorized an agreement with
ENSR International in the amount of $8 , 160 . ENSR' s scope of work
included the completion of a site investigation and remediation
objectives evaluation to determine the extent of remedial
activities that may be necessary to achieve site clean-up
objectives that are consistent with the planned residential
development .
ENSR has completed the Site Remediation Plan Application and
submitted the Site Investigation Work Plan to the IEPA on March 15,
2002 .
The plan was enrolled in the voluntary site remediation program on
March 19, 2002 . An IEPA project manager has been assigned to the
sites . The IEPA has advised ENSR that it may take 60 days to
complete the review of the submittals . The work plan submitted to
IEPA called for eight soil borings and nine monitoring wells .
The development agreement with PAR states that the City is to
obtain a No Further Remediation Letter (s) for the property for
residential standard prior to closing. The closing (s) is/are
anticipated to be approximately 300 days from Februarys 13 , 2002 .
The site review by the City will be completed by mid June. Given
this timing, ENSR suggests that the City begin the site
investigation without waiting for the IEPA review of the Work Plan.
Proceeding now would allow the City to meet the time line
identified in the PAR Development Agreement .
ENSR Environmental Testing Proposal
April 19, 2002
Page 2
ENSR has proposed a very traditional approach for investigating the
three sites . The proposed procedure involves a series of soil
borings and groundwater testing wells . The down side of proceeding
prior to IEPA approval of the work plan would be that IEPA may
require that additional soil borings or groundwater monitoring
wells be installed.
Staff is proposing that the following tasks be authorized at this
time :
1 . Soil Investigation - eight borings
2 . Groundwater assessment - nine wells
3 . Site Investigation Reports
4 . Remediation Objective Report
5 . Project Coordination and Management Services
If the City contracts directly with ENSR for all elements of the
scope of work, the cost would be $55, 418 (see table 1) . ENSR would
subcontract for soil investigation, well placement and laboratory
analysis .
If the City was to contract directly for the drilling services and
laboratory testing, and if ENSR was to provide oversight for the
soil boring and groundwater well placement and review and analysis
of test results, the total project cost would be $56, 709 .
Proposals were solicited from three drilling companies and
laboratories to determine direct cost quotes to the City.
Contracting directly with ENSR is cheaper than contracting with
private drillers and labs due to the significant discounts that a
firm of ENSR' s size is able to obtain.
Staff is recommending that ENSR be authorized to proceed with the
identified scope of services at a cost of $55, 418 due to the press
of time relating to the PAR Development Agreement and the
expectation of beginning construction at Festival Park in July of
2002 . The award of a contract to ENSR will require an exception to
the procurement ordinance.
COMMUNITY GROUPS/INTERESTED PERSONS CONTACTED
None.
ENSR Environmental Testing Proposal
April 19, 2002
Page 3
IMPACT
DV_FINANCIAL
The cost of this contract with ENSR will total $55, 418 for site
investigation, project management and report preparation. Costs
associated with this project will be charged to the Riverboat Fund,
Riverfront/Center City Improvements, account number 275-0000-
791 . 92-35, project number 039520 .
The City Council has previously approved $1, 870, 000 for Festival
Park from the Riverboat Fund and $600, 000 from the South Grove TIF
fund, for a total of $2 .47 million. Of this amount, $614, 588 has
been committed to date.
�_ /
„ i\ LEGAL IMPACT
'/V``-7�/ An exception to the procurement ordinance is required. A written
agreement would also need to be prepared.
ALTERNATIVES
1 . Proceed with an agreement with ENSR for environmental services
in the amount of $55, 418 .
2 . Choose not to enter into an agreement with ENSR.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that an agreement in the amount of $55, 418 be
entered into with ENSR for environmental services related to the
South Grove Avenue residential project .
Respectfully submitted,
Olu emi larin
Inte im Ci a ger
RHM:sp
Attachment
ENSR International
27755 Diehl Road
Warrenville,IL 60555-3998
(630)836-1700
FAX(630)836-1711
April 2, 2002 www.ensr.com
ENSR Project No. 10049-002
Mr. Raymond H. Moller
Director of Economic Development and Business Services
City of Elgin
150 Dexter Court
Elgin, IL 60120
SUBJECT: Request for Authorization
Festival Park Redevelopment Sites
Site Investigation Tasks
Dear Ray:
Pursuant to our telephone conversations, ENSR has submitted the Work Plans for the
site investigation activity for the three Festival Park sites to the Illinois EPA. In
conversation with our assigned Illinois EPA Project Manager, it looks as though we will
not receive Agency comments on the Work Plans for approximately 60 days. In order to
comply with the schedule outlined in the Development Agreement for the Crocker
Theater Site and Townhome Redevelopment Site, ENSR recommends proceeding with
the investigation work as soon as practicable.
Illinois EPA approval of the Work Plans is not a requirement of the Site Remediation
Program. The work plans must be completed and submitted at some point in time, but
the City may proceed with the site investigation work at its discretion. The advantage of
allowing the Illinois EPA to review and comment on the plans is to obtain early
concurrence with the proposed site investigation strategy and avoid any problems or
duplication of efforts if the Agency has differing views on the investigation work.
To proceed at this point will ensure our ability to meet the project schedule in that we will
be able to have the majority of the site characterization data available during the 120-
day investigation period. At a minimum we would then be able to provide a general
assessment of the environmental conditions and be in a position to provide
recommendations and conclusions regarding the sites.
With reference to ENSR's December 26, 2001 proposal, the first two tasks that were
proposed, SRP Application/Regulatory Coordination (Task 100) and Site Investigation
Work Plans (Task 200), were authorized by the City on February 18, 2002 in the amount
of$8,160.00. With the completion and submittal of the Work Plans, these tasks are now
essentially complete.
ENSR requests authorization in the amount of $55,418.00 to undertake the remaining
tasks outlined in our proposal dated December 26, 2001. Changes in the proposed costs
between our original costs and the enclosed revised cost proposal are as follows:
® Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services
-
ULM. City Mr. Ray Moller
of Elgin
April 2, 2002
Page 2
• Additional Well Sampling- During the development of the work plans we identified
two groundwater wells that are adjacent to the Townhome Redevelopment site. We
added additional labor (4 hours) and laboratory costs to sample these wells during
the site investigation;
• Additional Soil Borings — We modified the number of soil borings on the Townhome
site from 7 to 8 and on the Festival Park site from 8 to 9. These changes were
considered based on the additional area of the Townhome Site once Wellington
Avenue was vacated and the portion of the former railroad right-of-way was added to
the site. These changes affect the laboratory costs but do not substantially increase
the estimated labor effort; and
• We have obtained slightly more favorable pricing from the laboratory to perform the
analytical work.
Table 1, attached, shows the original proposed costs and current estimated costs for the
work. The cost differential between the 12/26/01 proposal and the current estimate is
$405.00. These cost estimates are both based on ENSR being responsible for
subcontracting the laboratory and drilling services as part of its entire scope of work for
the City of Elgin. ENSR has obtained three quotations from potential drilling firms and
laboratories to perform the subcontracted services. These quotes are attached for your
reference.
A separate table, Table2, is also provided to compare the cost of the City directly
contracting the laboratory and drilling services with ENSR providing the field oversight
and professional services. While this method of contracting eliminates ENSR's handling
fee of 10 % on the subcontracted services, it is less advantageous overall to the City.
ENSR has negotiated discounts on laboratory services from our preferred vendor,
ENCHEM, in consideration of the volume of work placed by ENSR. This discount would
not be available to the City of Elgin if contracted directly. Further, our experience is that
we have better control over these services if it is subcontracted through ENSR and we
can therefore provide greater assurance of meeting the critical project schedule.
Accordingly, ENSR recommends the authorization of the total scope of work, including
drilling and laboratory services in the amount of$55,418.00.
Please feel free to call on us if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ENSR CORPORATION
rGt�t pat
Nardozzi, P.E.
Regional Program Manager
cc: Mr.William Cogley—City of Elgin.
e Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services
TABLE 1
Level of Effort and Cost Estimate
Festival Park Redevelopment Sites
Revised Costs as of 412/02
City of Elgin
10049-AO21R190010 Prop.Mgr J.Nardozzl
Labor Requested Proposed Cost
TASKS Hrs. Labor OD.Cs Subs ' SUBTOTAL Authorization 12/26/2001
100 SRP/Regulatory Coord. 30 $3,520 $476 $0 $3,996 Auth 2/18/02 $0
................................................................................................................ ..................... ............................................................................................. ..............................................................._.............. ............................................
200 SI Work Plan 41 $4,004 $160 $0 $4,164 Auth 2/18/02 $0
........................................................................................................... ..................... ............................................................................................. ................I.............._ ............................................. ..............................
300 Soil Investigation 30 $2,790 $1,081 $13,635 $17,506 $17,506 $17,441
_.................................................... ..................... ................................. .................... ._................................ .................................
..............................................
400 Groundwater Assessment 62 $5,324 $885 $6,156 $12,365 $12,365 $12,025
.................................................................................................................... ..................... ................................. ........................................................... ............................................................................... ............................................
500 Site Investigation Reports (3) 138 $11,832 $473 $0 $12,305 $12,305 $12,305
........................_........................................................ ..................... ................................. ........................................................... ............................................................................... ..........................
..�.............
600 ROR/TACO Evaluation 64 $5,940 $238 $0 $6,178 $6,178 $6,178
............................................................................................................ ..................... ...........................................................................................................................................................................
700 Coord. & Mtgs. 57 $6,645 $419 $0 $7,064 $7,064 $7,064
.................................................................................................................. ..................... ..........$.................... ........................................................... ............................................................................... ...............$..................
Category Totals: 422 40,055 $3,732 $19,791 $63,578 $55,418 55,013
Requested Autorization (4/2/02) $55,418
' Subcontractors:
Drilling Services: Rock and Soil Drilling Corporation See Attached Quote
St. Charles, IL
Dave D'Armond
Laboratory Services ENCHEM See Attached Quote
Green Bay, WI
Laura Woefel
TABLE 2
Level of Effort and Cost Estimate
Festival Park Redevelopment Sites
Costs Based on Direct Contracting by City of Elgin
City of Elgin
10049-AO2/R 190010 Prop.Mgr J.Nardozzi
Labor Requested
TASKS Hrs. Labor ODCs Subs SUBTOTAL Authorization
100 SRP/Regulatory Coord. 3...0 $3,520 $476 $0 $3,996 Prev. Auth
......................................................................................................... .............................................:...................................160..............................0 ..................................................................................
200 SI Work
an 41 $4004 $ $ $4,164 Prev. Auth
.................................................................................................................................... ............................... ........... ................................. ............................................................... ................
300 Soil Investigation 30 $2 790 $1 08.. $0 $3,871 $3,871
400 Groundwater Assessment 62 $5,324 $885 $0 $6:2-
6,209 $6,209
........................................................................................ ............................................................................................. ................................. ....................�._......................................... .............
500 Site Investigation Reports (3) 138 $11,832 $473 $0 $121,.30.5..'.." $12 305
_....................................... ......................... ...................'_._......................................... ................................. ............... . ......... ...........................�.._.......
600 ROR/TACO Evaluation 64 $5 940 $238 $0 $6,178 $6,178
..................................................................................................... .............. ......... .............._.. ............ . ............................................................. ..
700 Coord. & Mtgs. 57 $6,645 $419 $0 $7,064 $x,064
....................................................................................................................... ..........................................._................................................ ................................. ................................................................................
.........................................................................................g...�..................... ............................................................................................................................... ...................................................................................
Cate o Totals: 422 $40,055 $3,732 $0 $43,787 $35,627
ENSR Labor and Reimbursibles(4/ $35,627
Direct Contract by Elgin
300/400 Environmental Driller Rock and Soil Drilling Corp Quote 4/1/02 $5,098
300/400 Laboratory Services ENCHEM Quote 4/2/02 $15,984
Subtotal -Direct Contracts by Elgin $21,082
Total Estimated Cost of Project $56,709
04/02/02 11:11 $630 377 0279 ROCK s SOIL DRIL 1Q 002/003
e-5-pazz"d Z
Environmental & Geotechnical Drilling
Client: ENSR Date: April 2.2002
Contact- John Nsrdaa+
Job Location: Elgin, IL
Scope of Work: Push 1$ probes to 20', converting 7 to 2" PVC MW's @ 20'. Also 5 @4'.
1 day with Bobcat Geoprobe and 1 days with Goo 66DT.
Continuous MacraXore samples on Bobcat, Dual Tube samples
on Goo 66DT. Backfill with cuttings and chips. Project Coordination.
Install wells through Dual Tube outer casing (not augers).
Item Name Quantity Description Price TOTAL
Mobilization: Bobcat Geoprobe 1 Lump Sum $150.00 $150.00
Geoprobe Services 1 Day(s) 880.00 880.00
8 hrs min/day @$110.00/hour
Overtime: after 8 hours/day ? Hour(s) 165.00 7
4-Foot Macro-Core Sleeves 81 Each 4.00 324.00
Mobilization: Geo 66DT 1 Lump Sum $195.00 $195.00
Geoprobe Services: 66DT 1 Day(s) 1,080.00 1,080.00
8 hrs min/day @$135-00/hour
Overtime: after 8 hours/day ? Hour(s) 202.50 7
Dual Tube Sleeves 35 Each 8.00 280.00
5-Foot Macro-Core Sleeves 7 Each 6.00 ?
Disposable Tips 7 Each 35.00 245.00
Decontamination Equipment 2 Day(s) 100.00 200.00
55 Gallon DOT Refuse Drums 3 Each 35-00 105.00
Sand 14 Bag(s) 8.00 112.00
Bentonite Chips 12 Bag(s) B.00 96.00
Concrete 2 Bag(s) 8.00 16.00
/asphalt Patch 2 Bags) 15.00 30.00
2"x 10'PVC(Sch 40) Riser 7 Each 18.00 126.00
2"x 10'PVC (Sch 40) Screens 7 Each 30.00 210.00
2" Bottom Plugs/Caps PVC 7 Each 7.00 49.00
2"Locking Caps 7 Each 22-00 154.00
4-Inch Flush Well Boxes 7 Each 55.00 365.00
Concrete Coring Machine 1 Day(s) 125.00 125.00
Concrete Cores 12 Inches 3.00 36.00
Project Coordination 1 Lump Sum 300.00 300.00
Estimated Total $5,098.00
NOTE: This scope could take longer depending upon site conditions, access, etc.
NOTE: The attached Terms 8 Conditions should be made part of any agreement.
1 geobob1 D.XLS
1720 East Tyler Road • St. Charles, Illinois 60174
Tel 630-377-7190 • 1-80�JAA -?190 • Fax 630-377-0279
w
ww.rockandsoildrilling.com - e ai : mail®rockandsoildrilling.com
v:i vii v., 11.11 yU.JV oil VGIU IIVI.l1 O OV1L VAiL W/. UUd/UU3
ROCK& SOU,DRILLING CORP.
STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The attached price quotation is based on the following terms, unless otherwise indicated on the
quotation. Please notify our office in the event that any of the terms below is unacceptable, and
we shall provide you with a revised price quotation.
1. Site ReFresentative — A representative from the client's firm shall be on site at all times
to provide direction to the drilling staff.
2. Personal Protective Equipment and Site Contamination — Personal protective equipment
("PPE") shall consist of hard hat, eye protection, hearing protection, gloves and steel-toe boots.
In the event that additional PPE is required, client shall determine required level. In case of a
contaminated site, client shall continuously monitor contamination levels and suggest upgraded
PPE, if appropriate.
3. Work Day and "Drillin Services' — Crews shall not wort: more than eight hours on site
per day unless otherwise indicated on quotation. 'Drilling services" time includes all time on site
and includes, but is not limited to, time spent drilling, constructing wells/pads and standby time
not caused by Rock& Soil.
4. Limited Knowledge — Quotation is based solely on information known at the time of
quotation. Normal conditions and standard operating procedures are assumed. Unusual or
difficult circumstances or a change in scope of work may create additional cost. Quantities are
estimates and ac ual quantities used will appear on the final invoice. Standby time shall apply to
those delays that are not caused by Rock & Soil staff. Mobilization charge is based on one
mobilization and remobilization shall be billed additionally.
S. Utilitv Clearances and Site Access— Client shall provide utility clearances, traffic control
and permits. Client shall provide access and route of access to a site that is unobstructed with
fuim terrain. At least 15 feet of space shall exist between drill rig mast and standard overhead
lines; high voltage lines require additional space. If the project involves rock drilling or coring, a
sufficient amount of potable water is assumed to be present at the site.
6_ Broken or Damaged Equipment — In the event that equipment and tools are broken or
damaged beyond ordinary wear and tear, client agrees to reimburse for the actual cost of repair
plus a 15% restocking fee.
7, Payment Terms — Payment terms are net 30 days, past due charges of 1.5% per month,
unless otherwise agreed to in a subcontract agreement_
8, Industry Assumptions — Typical industry practice shall apply secondarily to the attached
quotation.
Please note that Rock&Soil is committed to long-term relationships with its clients; therefore, a
cost estimate is most typically an accurate representation of actual cost.
'04/01/02 MON 17:01 FAX 630 365 1650 MID-AMERICA DRILLING SRV i0001
JfidwAinen'ca
DRILLING SERVICES, INC.
700 Hicks Drive - Elburn,IL 80119.9059
Phone(630)36S4)600 Fax(630)365-1650 Toll Free(877)587-9800 www.madrilling.com
- - ,.y^,: :.i{a't.:�.J:a4T_wry..•Y_l':^ �:i4:v '-:,:,a - �'i:.«
r+.�•M1S s:(. i.�K:.t•: .k.: "y�.,....,S�:^!: y:i• ."l�i. rJ-.. :.;An r•1�'..:'y.%
r ...
.._,-,..,..,... .n.F.a. :5.:.,•,•-!�?�:•,1,�,+..,....v...),,":::,' x•..,�xrtk,.r c'. :.• . ., ;. .. y,. _ ..�'- n:;.�.,. rs:Y`_:i`.::''.i>
.. , .t•SSi'.._...,,..:,.4, .,,5'.r�r.L-�.i•.:::-.,.w.;,.:-.:...:_:.. ,.•,.. �. . �. :.F.i '.s.:i.J�:.L�..,ti;Fp.yW .Il, x'M^• .c4t.•.'r::�[�' ..+r.r.t„a:i`
w,.c;,'')'-..;• ...{i,:,'�.,�.,,r1.G�, ..eLoa,n;f'._,.....••:. ti.�_��_.:� �. '���� .«�..:•!��� ii"'4it..-4.4n•>,.,...tr..n v)::ic�< . u,, a.!r.:..:r:`� 4_,�
•: _:_.,�a;:l;..,. s._,,t_r:.- '•-.r::�.. '.': �y.:, ..� ,E ..�, ��`F.:.. =Ana:.. r: - _.+ti....P'�
,
k rr`. C •,w+.�..t::15. ,.�.:SY:�I'•:ZY^;�,'�:«'�utw w.":�::t:;�:!�`:`::_�<eq_,
Date: April 1, 2002
To: John Nardoazi
Company: ENSR Corporation
Phone: 630--836-1700
Fax: 630-836-1711
Total Paces: 4
From: K. Kyle Arn ey,P.G.
Reference: Elgin, Illinois
Message_ Attached are the cost estimates that you requested.
Please give the a call.if you have any questions.
Job Scheduled: TBD Time: TBD
Thank you,
K. Kyle Arney, P.G.
Client Services Manager.
...tt....... a. ,.•r..•
_ .... ...-._ .. t :.. .J. .•. _:.f'_.tx '..'.:-I'..:.:i.::.:".t:,:'•�..l�.:v.kv.::'ill::wv.�:;1::_,:::1::'.1:.�:ilr`::1:-•�;=^::'.N 1,n 1�.,•^:f,:1ti.T'Y_ _
.-:..r...�....... ......... .....r.. x. ....:..,.-.�•.,.........,:,.n., .....! ,.�,..'. ,-n.,...,.�,.-,..L._,..t:..1..)l r. .,rt:w T.... _..a:. - y,,.-y-.
................. . ..x.....:........x,?>.•.. ....�....._..,i _.. ... _.:.::a,.:..:,..-_...,i..-,...,..x....-.. ;x P�.:.. ti5ii',i':'�i�: .r ...�.:. +..h.,j$'<"-';•
Privilege and confidentiality notice
This message is intended only for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
privileged and/or confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent
responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution,or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited_ If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately at(630)3650600 and return the original message to us at the address above via the U.S.
Postal Service. Thank You.
Environmental and Geotechnical Solutions
• 04/01/01 MON 17:01 FAX 630 365 1650 MID-AMERICA DRILLING SRV 10002
JlidmAmerlca
DRILLING SERVICES, INC.
April 1,2002
700 Hicks Drive • Elburn,IL 130113-9059
Phone(630)365-0600 Fox(630)365-1650 • TrAI Free 1877)587-9800 wwwrnadritling.co
John Corporation i m
Proposal No: E0401 02-C
ENSR vrpornLion
27755 Diehl Road Client Project No:
Warrenvillc,Illinois 60555 Phone: 630-836-1700
Pa.: 630-836-1711
Scope of Work: Advance eight(8)Ge oprobcO soil borings to 20 0 and fiw-(5)Geoprobco soil
borings to 3 R bacla-Ml borings with bentonhe and p%tch surt�ce,
Advance seven(7)soil borings to 20 It,continuous sampling,convert borings to 2"
PVC monitoring wellm,10 ft screens,flush well boxes.Perform work with HSAs.
Drum:dl soil cuttings and decors fluids,
All locations are acca:ssible with standard Combo-Truck drill rig.
Location: L11gin,Illinois
Des criptiun Amount Unit Quantity
CO rnliaTiuek Drill Rig Serveer Q y Total
Mobilization x 300.00 lump sum l
4 hr.mina $137.50/hr $ 300-00
� 1,100.00 day 3 3,300,00
Overtime$185,00/hr hour
Du,on Fquipment 120.00 day 3
Macroaore Liners 360,00
4-00 each 45 180.00
Concrete Saw 50.00 day 1
2"X 10'PVC Screen 50.00
35.00 each 7 245.00
2"X 10'PVC Riser 20.OU each 7
2" 20.00 each I.ock-ing Cap 140.00
2��Cap/Plug 800 each 7 140.00
Sand 7 56,00
10.00 bag 49 490-00
8"Flush Well Box 75.00 each 7
Bentonite Pellets 525.00
35.00 pail 7 2,45-00
Bc.-ntonite Chips 12.00 bag 28
Concrete 336.00
10.00 bag 14 140-00
55 Gallon Drum 35.00 etch 9
Estiimated Total 315.00
$ G,S2.2.00
Payment Terms: Net 30 Duys
This proposal is hcing nibmitted w an cst=-Oc,unit quantities may vary. A monthly interest charge
rcje e of past 1.5%will be added to p due invoices. Client is responsible for eleving all utilities prior to the
commencement of field work and to inform our personnel of pLt specific methodologies and any lalown
or suspected site hazards- Your signature below affirm-i your agreement to all the aforementioned terms.
Prepared by.
Accepted Iry:
K Kylc A.rncy,P.t3. (sigaanirddntc)
Client Services Manager
Mid-America Drilling Services.lac- (print numcj6tic)
Environmental and Geotechnical Solutions
01/01/02 MON 17:03 FAX 690 365 1650 MID-AMERICA DRILLING 5RV tJuu4
Payment Term! Net 30 Days
This proposal is bring submitted as an estimate;unit quautities may vary. A monthly interest churgc of
1.5%will be added to past due lavoices. Clicut is responsible for clearing all utilities prior to the
commekrzatnemt of fiold work and to inform our peraoemel of project specific methodologies and any Imow-n
or suspected site hazards. Your signature below afffiws your agreement to all the aforementioned terms.
Prepared y:, Accepted bv'
ry C K e (si0 mture/date)
Clic Ices Manager
d-Ame iea Drilling;Services,Inc. (print uamr/ritle)
04/02/2002 09:06 8156832791 GEOCON PAGE 01
P.O.Box 410,Crescent City, IL 60928.
(815)683-2810. Fax 683-2791
GEOCON test drillingg inc.
To: John Nardozzi - ENSR From: Kenneth Rippy- GEOCON
Fox: 630-836-1711 Pages:2
Pho•w: 630-839-5361 Date: 04/01/02
Re: Drilling Quote— Elgin, IL CC:
❑ Urgent ❑ For Review D Please Com"oent O Plow Reply D Pies" Recycle
John.
Attached is the cost estimate for the Elgin project. Please note that we have quoted
the geoprobe work to be done with a conventional drill rig, using 3 % inch hollow
stem augers. Please call with any questions. Thank you for the opportunity to
provide this quotation.
Ken.
04/02/2002 09:06 8156832791 GEOCON PAGE 02
PROJECT ESTIMATE
Client Name. ENSR-John.M. Nardozzi Date: April 1, 2002
Project Name: Subcontract Drilling Services GEOCON Proposal No. GTD-P02-018
Project Location: Elgin, Illinois
Quantity Unit Fee I2W
I. Feld Exploration Services
1. Mobilization of drilling equipment and personnel. Lump Sum $300.00 $300.00
2. Geoprobe using 31/4"auger and split-spoon sampling. 175 feet $8.00 $1,400.00
3. Soil drilling with 4 114"auger with split-spoon sampling. 106 feet $10.00 $1,060.00
4. Drill through up to 8 Inches of concrete or asphalt. 10 borings $25.00 $250.00
5. 2"PVC monitoring well Installation with flush mount cover 106 feet $18.00 $1.908.00
6. Bentonite chips to backfill borings not
completed as groundwater monitoring wells. 15 bags $9.00 $135.00
7. Decontamination. 2 hours $100.00 $200.00
8. 55 gallon drums. 0 drums $35.00 $0.00
9. Patch borings located In paved areas 10 borings $10.00 $100.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED FEE: $5,353.00
Note: GEOCON does not own a geoprobe, so the borings specified as geoprobes will
be performed with the drill rig using 3 1/4 inch hollow stem auger. The cost would
be the same whether billed to ENSR or the City of Elgin.
City of Elgin
Festival Park Sites
Site Investigtion Work Plan Summary
Analytical Parameters-Soil Anal 'al Parameters-Water
Site Location Boring ,Boring ;Convertto MW Boring VOCs PNA$ PP Metals pH Pesticide VOCs PNAs '''PP Metals pH
ID Depth Type s! PCgs .
Ift•}
Crocker Theater CTB-1 3 GeoProbe 1 1 1 1 0
CTB-2 20 MW-1 GeoProbe 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1
CTB-3 20 GeoProbe 2 2 2 2 0
Subtotal 43 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1
Townhome Site THB-1 20 MW-2 GeoProbe 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
THB-2 3 GroProbe 1 1 1 1 0
THB-3 20 MW-5 GeoProbe 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1
THB4 3 1 1 1 1 0
THB-5 20 MW4 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
THB-6 20 2 2 2 2 0
THB-7 20 2 2 2 2 0
THB-8 20 MW-3 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1
Existing Well 1 1 1 1
Subtotal 126 12 12 12 12 1 5 5 5 5
Festival Park Site FPB-1 20 2 2 2 2 0
FPB-2 20 MW-6 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1
FPB-3 3 1 1 1 1 0
FPB4 3 1 1 1 1 0
FPB-5 20 2 2 2 2 0
FPB-6 20 MW-7 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1
FPB-7 20 2 2 2 2 1
FPB-8 20 2 2 2 2 0
FPB-9 20 2 2 2 2 0
Existing Well 1 1 1 1
Subtotal 146 16 16 16 16 1 3 3 3 3
Grand Total 315 33 33 33 33 3 9 9 9 9
Analytical Mrst Env Unit Price for ENSR $95.00 $92.00 $105.00 $10.00 $170.00 $95.00 $92.00 $105.00 $10.00
Total for ENSR $3,135 $3,036 $3,465 $330 $510 $855 $828 $945 $90 $13,194
Analytical CFirst Env Unit Price for City of $114.00 $111.00 $126.00 $15.00 $204.00 $114.00 $111.00 $126.00 $15.00
Total for City of Elgin $3,762 $3,663 $4,158 $495 $612 $1,026 $999 $1,134 $135 $15,984
Costs Submitted By: ENCHEM 5-7 day turnaround,except pesticides/PCBs
Green Bay,VA EPA Level 1 QC
Laura Woefel Costs do not Include sampling supplies or prep for Method 5035 for soil VOCs
4/2/2002
City of Elgin
Festival Park Sites
Site Investigtion Work Plan Summary
Analytical Parameters-Soil Analytial Parameters-Water
Site Boring ID Boring Convertto MW VOCs PNAS' PP Metals PH' PesticideW VOCs": PNAS PPMetpls PH''
Depth PCBs
11.1
Crocker Theater CTB-1 3 1 1 1 1 0
CTB-2 20 MW-1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1
CTB-3 20 2 2 2 2 0
Subtotal 43 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1
Townhome Site THB-1 20 MW-2 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
THB-2 3 1 1 1 1 0
TH85 20 MW-5 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1
THB-4 3 1 1 1 1 0
THB-5 20 MW-4 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
THB-6 20 2 2 2 2 0
THB-7 20 2 2 2 2 0
THB-8 20 MW-3 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1
Existing Well 1 1 1 1
Subtotal 126 12 12 12 12 1 5 5 5 5
Festival Park Site FPB-1 20 2 2 2 2 0
FPB•2 20 MW-6 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1
FPS-3 3 1 1 1 1 0
FPB-4 3 1 1 1 1 0
FPB-5 20 2 2 2 2 0
FPB-6 20 MW-7 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1
FPB-7 20 2 2 2 2 1
FPB-8 20 2 2 2 2 0
FPB-9 20 2 2 2 2 0
Existing Well 1 1 1 1
Subtotal 146 16 16 16 16 1 3 3 3 3
Grand Total 315 33 33 33 33 3 9 9 9 9
Analytical Cost Unit Price for ENSR $129.00 $97.50 $120.90 $7.80 $117.00 $117.00 $97.50 $120.90 $3.90
Total for ENSR $4,257 $3,218 $3,990 $257 $351 $1,053 $878 $1,088 $35 $15,125
Analytical Cost Unit Price for City of Elgin $147.00 $112.50 $139.50 $9.00 $135.00 $135.00 $112.50 $139.50 $4.50
Total for City of Elgin $4,851 $3,713 $4,604 $297 $405 $1,215 $1,013 $1,256 $41 $17,593
Costs Submitted By: First Environmental Laboratories,Inc,
Naperville,IL
Stan Zaworski
www.firstenv.com
4/1/2002
City of EW m
Feadval Paris Saes N`o
Sit9lnveatigtion Work Plan Summary m
CS)
N
sal Pararselers-SoN A Peramel*m-1Abw
Slb LSCatton Borinq Boring VOCs PNAS PP NWOO PH P"Oelde VOGS PNAS PP4Netals PH N
ID Depth(f1.) s1 PCBs
reclosr Theater GTB4 3 1 1 1 1 0
CTS-2 20 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1
GTS2 2D 2 2 2 2 0
S 43 5 5 5 b 1 1 1 1 1
Townhoene�k TH8-1 20 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 00
TAB-2 3 1 1 1 1 0 On
THB-3 20 2 2 2 2 1
THB-4 3 1 t 1 1 0 m
THB-5 20 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 W
THB-5 20 2 2 2 2 0
T43-7 20 2 2 2 2 0
THB-B 20 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1
ybtotal 1 12 12 12 1 5 5 5
F"tWai Park Sits FPB-1 20 2 2 2 2 0
FPB-2 2D 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1
FPB-3 3 1 1 1 1 0
FPS-4 3 1 1 1 1 0
FPB-8 20 2 2 2 2 0
FPS-6 20 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1
FPS-7 20 2 2 2 2 1
FP84 20 2 2 2 2 D
FP" 20 2 2 2 2 0 1 1 1 1
146 16 16 16 16 1 3 3 3 3 W
prand 316 33 33 33 33 3 9 9 9 9 OD
Arlslylical Goat Total for $110.00
33,630 $2805 $130-W
K290 5165 $15$465 $tO$900D $96.00 $$1 125 $5-00
$45 $14,190
w
Analytical Cost Unil Prim $140.00 $65.00 $145.00 $10.00 $155.00 $130.00 $85.00 $146.00 $10.00
D Total far $4,620 $2,005 $4.785 $330 $465 $1,170 $785 $1,305 $90 $16,336
r chi
Y Casts Submflted By: Michael J.Kohl
m US Biosystems,Inc.
Phone:(630)548-1034
AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
4F
THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT made and entered into this day
of U , 2002 , by and between the CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, a
municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City" ) , and
ENSR Corporation, a Delaware corporation, authorized to do business
in the State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as the
"Consultant" ) .
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the City and the Consultant have previously entered
into a Professional Services Agreement dated February 18 , 2002 ,
wherein Consultant provided to the City certain consulting services
regarding the Festival Park, the Crocker Theater and the South
Grove Townhome Site .
WHEREAS, the City has determined it to be necessary and
desirable to obtain the further assistance of the Consultant to
provide continued consulting services regarding environmental
testing for the Festival Park, the Crocker Theater and the South
Grove Townhome Site .
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual
promises and covenants contained herein, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows :
1 . The Professional Services Agreement between the City and
the Consultant dated February 18 , 2002 , is hereby amended
as follows :
A. Paragraph 1 entitled "Scope of Services" is amended
by adding an additional paragraph C thereto to read
as follows :
"Consultant shall also perform and direct the necessary
qualified personnel to perform the professional services
as set forth in the Scope of Services documents entitled
ENSR Site Investigation Proposal , consisting of two (2)
pages, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit
B. Paragraph 2 entitled "Schedule and Progress
Reports is amended by adding an additional
paragraph thereto to read as follows :
"Consultant' s responsibility to provide the services in
Exhibit 1-A shall commence as of April 25 , 2002 , and
shall continue until the date the City determines that
all of the Consultant' s work regarding the services in
Exhibit 1-A have been completed. Consultant shall perform
the services described in Exhibit 1-A in as expeditious
a manner as reasonably practicable . "
C. Paragraph 4 entitled "Payments to the Consultant"
is amended by adding an additional paragraph
thereto to read as follows :
"Payments for services provided by the Consultant set
forth in Exhibit 1-A hereof shall be reimbursed at the
hourly rate of its professional and technical personnel
as set forth on Exhibit 2 attached hereto and made a part
hereof by this reference with the total fees and expenses
due to be paid to the Consultant for the services
described in Exhibit 1-A not to exceed $55 , 418 . 00
regardless of actual time expended or actual costs
incurred by the Consultant unless material modifications
to the Consultant' s Scope of Services are authorized in
writing by the City and approved by the City Council .
Consultant' s cost estimates for the various aspects of
the services to be performed in Exhibit 1-A are set forth
in Exhibit 1-A. The costs of all subcontractors are
included in such not-to-exceed figure of $55 , 418 . 00 . "
2 . That except as expressly amended herein the terms of the
Professional Services Agreement between the City and the
Consultant dated February 18 , 2002 , shall remain in
effect and shall apply to the additional services to be
performed by the Consultant as described in this
Amendment Agreement and as set forth in Exhibit 1-A
hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into and
executed this amendment agreement on the date and year first
written above .
CITY OF ELGIN ENSR CORPORATION
By By
Olufemi larin �JaML`S geQf54'�'b
Int rim pager vme- Pe"10e*+T
Attest :
L..
City Clerk
a ,:i 'Mt
City of Elgin
Proposal for Environmental
Consulting Services for
Festival Park Redevelopment
® Sites
ENSR Corporation
December 2001
Document Number 10049-A02
Exhibit A
EpUt ENSR International
27755 Diehl Road
Warrenville.IL 60555-3998
(630)836-1700
FAX(630)836-1711
www.ensr.com
December 26, 2001
ENSR Proposal No. 10049-A02
Mr. Raymond H. Moller
Director of Economic Development and Business Services
City of Elgin
150 Dexter Court
Elgin, IL 60120
SUBJECT: Proposal to Provide Environmental Consulting Services
Festival Park Redevelopment Sites
Dear Mr.-Moller.
ENSR Corporation (ENSR)is pleased to present this proposal to provide the City of Elgin with
environmental consulting services related to the redevelopment of three properties on the
south side of City Center. These properties include Festival Park, a site to the east slated for a
new townhome redevelopment, and the Crocker Theatre site. Our proposal is submitted in
response to your verbal request of December 10, 2001 and the December 17"' meeting with
the Mayor, key City staff,and the development firm.
ENSR is committed to assisting the City in addressing the environmental issues at these
properties in order that the proposed redevelopment plans can proceed. Our proposal
includes an investigation phase that will further define the extent of contamination and a cost-
effective strategy that will allow redevelopment in a timely manner. ENSR will pursue the,
project through the State of Illinois' Site Remediation Program (SRP) so that the City can
ultimately obtain a No Further Remediation (NFR) letter for each site. Securing an NFR for
these parcels will assure the developer, as well as future residents of the sites, that the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed and approved of the investigation and
remediation steps undertaken by ENSR on behalf of the City.
Our 70-person Chicago area client service center (CSC) is located in the western suburb of
Warrenville, Illinois, approximately 20 miles from the Festival Park Redevelopment sites.
The Warrenville CSC has approximately 40 staff capable of performing geologic and
hydrogeologic assessments,assisting with the selection of a remedial method, and designing
and implementing remedial actions once a course of action is selected. Our technical staff is
currently engaged in a wide variety of remediation projects that range from risk-based
corrective action efforts to full scale hybrid soil and groundwater remediation systems under
IEPA SRP regulations. -
d_1Proposa1s1P100%10049 - City of Ekp'nTeswal Park-pro.doc
Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services
t EN 1[•�t!
. Mr. Raymond H.Moller
y City of Elgin
December 26, 2001
Page 2
s
: We appreciate this opportunity to continue our work with the City of Elgin and being a part of
the City Center redevelopment initiative. We look forward to discussing our proposal with
you and the City staff. If you have questions, please contact the undersigned at (630) 836-
1700.
Sincerely,
• ENSR Corporation
11
77ara��i1
`John M. Nardoai,PE J es President/
Department Manager, Gen President!
Remedial Engineering General Manager
cc: William Cogley—City Attorney
E. Powley-ENSR
3
NNM
3
}
a
y
i
3
y
• J:\Prop0sals\P100\10049 - City of EVKFestival Park.pro.doc
Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services
EUR.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................1-1
2.0 PROJECT APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK..........................................................................2-1
2.1 Project Understanding and Objectives................................................•..........................._.......2-1
2.2 Scope of Work................... ...............:..........................................................................2-1
3.0 SRP OVERVIEW AND PROJECT EXPERIENCE...........................................................................3-1
3.1 SRP Application........................................................................................................................3-2
3.2 Site Investigation Report..........................................••--•-•--........................---............................3-2
3.3 Remediation Objectives Report................................................•........•......................_:.............3-2
3.4 Remedial Action Plan.....................................................................•.......................••--..............3-3
3.5 Remedial Action Completion Report....................... ..................................................34
4.0 PROJECT TEAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT.......................................................................4-1
4.1 Project Team ...............................................................•...---...........---...................4-1
5.0 BUDGET TERMS AND ASSUMPTIONS.........................................................................................54
5.1 Budget Estimate.......................... ............................................5-1
5.2 Cost Assumptions.....................................................................................................................5-1
i5.3 Authorization..........................................................................................:..................................5-2
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT A Bibliography
ATTACHMENT B Commercial Terms,General Conditions,and Acceptance of Proposal Form
I
t
1
December.
J 4000saMPIO 0049-qy ofE9kffes5"1Perk.podoc 2001
EIS.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
ENSR Corporation (ENSR) is pleased to present this proposal to assist the City of Elgin with
environmental matters related to the redevelopment of the Festival Park site and two adjacent
parcels that are planned for residential redevelopment. The sites are identified and described as
follows:
Festival Park Site —This site occupies approximately 4.2 acres and is a landscaped parcel
• bordered by Prairie Street to the north, South Grove Avenue to the east, a bicycle path along
the Fox River to the west, and Lake Street to the south_ We understand the City intends to
further develop this property as park space with the construction of a pavilion, additional public
park features,and compensatory storage for storm water.
Tnwnhome Redeveloament Site — This site comprises a 5.0-acre area located east of the
Festival Park site. The site is currently a parking lot and landscaped space. Development
plans call for the construction of townhomes on this property.
Crocker Theatre Site—The Crocker Theatre is located to the north of the Festival Park Site and
is approximately 1.5 acres. The Site currently has two structures:the Crocker for resident i ding
and the Coin Shop_ The City is interested in redevelopment of this property
with the construction of a condominium building.
To address the environmental issues associated with redevelopment of the three sites, ENSR has
made a preliminary review of the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Reports prepared by
others for these sites. A listing of the prior reports upon which ENSR relied to develop this proposal
is provided in Attachment A
Our proposal has been organized into five sections. This section, the Introduction, presents an
overview of the proposal document. ENSR's proposed approach and scope of work are discussed
in Section 2.0. Section 3.0 provides a summary of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's
Site Remediation Program and the steps typically required to obtain a No Further Remediation
letter_ ENS Project Team and management approach are presented in Section 4.0. The final
section, Section 5.0, presents an estimated cost to perform the scope of work outlined in Section
2.0.
1-1 member,2001
,yp 1P10U100t9.City of E1Vff W81 Vrk"doc
EUM.
2.0 PROJECT APPROACH AND SCOPE OF WORK
2.1 Project Understanding and Objectives
ENSR understands that the City of .Elgin is interested in negotiating an agreement with a
development firm to redevelop the Townhome Site and the Crocker Theatre site. The City also
intends to make improvements to the Festival Park Site to enhance the space with the construction
of a band shell/pavilion. Part of these improvements also call for the excavation of soils to provide
compensatory storage volume for storm water.
Based on the site development plans, the City is interested in pursuing remediation to residential
standards for all three properties.
The goal of ENSR's work will be to provide environmental services and consultation to allow the
three sites to be investigated in accordance with the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's
(IEPA's)Site Remediation Program(SRP). The first major milestone will be the completion of a site
investigation and remediation objectives evaluation to determine the scope of remedial activities
necessary to achieve site clean up objectives that are consistent with the planned residential
redevelopment. The evaluation of environmental contaminants will be conducted in accordance
with Tier 1 residential clean up objectives as set forth under the Title 35 Part 742—Tiered Approach
to Corrective Action Objectives(TACO)regulations.
This first phase of the project will be conducted during the developer's 120 day feasibility review
period so that identified environmental issues can be taken into consideration prior to the
finalization of the redevelopment agreement between the City and the developer. ENSR will also
serve to coordinate the environmental regulatory review of the three sites in an effort to expedite the
project toward the eventual issuance of No Further Remediation(NFR)letters by the IEPA.
Future phases of the project, which are not included in the scope of work proposed herein, may
include the design and planning of remediation activities (i.e. Remedal Action Plan), implementing
or providing oversight for remedial activity, final reporting of remedial activity and negotiation of an
NFR letter.
2.2 Scope of Work
ENSR proposes to complete the following tasks to implement our technical approach at the three
redevelopment sites in the City of Elgin.
2-1
JVmposaftWIMIM49-City of E%nTMOW P&*4)M doc - December.2001
rJ
Effai
Task 100—SRP Application/Regulatory Coordination
Task 200—Site Investigation Work Plan
Task 300—Soil Investigation
Task 400—Area-wide Groundwater Assessment
Task 500—Site Investigation Reports
Task 600-Remediation Objectives Report
Task 700—Project Management/Meetings
Each of the tasks is described in the sections below.
Task 100 SRP Application/Regulatory Coordination
As the environmental consultant serving the City on this redevelopment program, ENSR will initiate
contact with the Illinois EPA's Site Remediation Program and coordinate the technical aspects of
the program during the course of the project_. The process will start with the completion of a SRP
application form(DRM-1)for each of the three sites._ Based on the December 17''meeting, ENSR
believes that enrolling the three properties into the SRP as discrete sites will benefit the program.
For example, in the.event different remedial activities are identified for different sites; separate
` applications will allow each site to proceed independently towards a No Further Remediation letter.
i Also, ENSR foresees the potential for different ownership of the three parcels at a later point in
time. Separate applications will ensure that.any property use conditions required by the NFR will
apply only to the specific site and not to all three properties.
The SRP requires the submittal of a $500 partial payment check made payable to the State of
Illinois upon enrollment.of each site. The City will also be responsible for IEPA costs associated
with review of the project deliverables and oversight activities performed by the Agency. ENSR has
not included the costs for these fees in our proposal.
Since the City has possession of current Phase I Environmental Assessment Reports for each site,
ENSR will submit these reports to the Illinois EPA with the initial SRP application. Providing the
available information to the IEPA at the earliest date is expected to help expedite EEPA's review
effort.
The SRP application is also the preferred decision point where the applicant indicates its choice to
pursue a focused or comprehensive NFR letter. A comprehensive NFR is based on an
investigation program aimed at identifying all recognized environmental conditions and related
contaminants of concern at a site. A focused NFR is intended to address specified and limited
number of environmental conditions or contaminants of concern. Based on ENSITs knowledge of
the sites"and the intended redevelopment efforts, ENSR is of the understanding that a
comprehensive NFR is desired. If unanticipated environmental conditions are encountered at the
sites,a decision to change the goal of the process to a focused NFR may become necessary.
2-2
December.toot
J:1Piap0sa1s1P1=joo49-Ciy d ElginNF.*.,a1 Pak.pm.doc
EIMI
Regulatory coordination efforts anticipated by ENSR include:
• One initial kick-off meeting with the SRP Project Manager to establish project goals and present
the planned site investigation approach. This meeting is assumed to take place in Springfield,
Illinois.
• Regular phone contacts with the SRP Project Manager to track Agency review, and expedites
response to any IEPA questions or comments.
• Participate in one on-site meeting with the SRP Project Manager to inspect the sites.
Task 200-Site Investigation Work Plan
As part of this task, ENSR will prepare a Site Investigation Work Plan (SIWP) describing
supplemental investigation activities including drilling and monitoring well installation details
and soil and groundwater sampling protocols.The SIWP will include a site-speck Health and
Safety Plan(HASP)to ensure the safety of all drilling and sampling personnel. The HASP will be
used by field personnel, along with the investigation approach presented in this proposal,to guide
drilling and sampling activities. The HASP will provide a list of emergency telephone numbers
and directions to the nearest medical facility. The SIWP will be issued in draft to the City for
review prior to submittal to the IEPA SRP Project Manager.
The SIWP will be developed based on available information, further discussion with the City,
and/or refinement of the project objectives. The SIWP will reflect the findings of the Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment reports and input from City personnel who may have direct
knowledge of past and present facility operations at the three sites.
SRP procedures do not require the submittal of a separate SIWP document to obtain IEPA
approval. However, ENSR has recognized the benefit of doing so, particularly in instances
where a comprehensive NFR is sought. The Agency's review of the work plan helps to
achieve buy-in with respect to the planned investigation work. If the schedule constraints will
allow, ENSR will take this approach.
Task 300—Soil Investigation
As part of mobilization activities for this task, ENSR will secure contracts with a drilling
subcontractor, and analytical laboratory to perform the work activities described in this section. In
conjunction with the subcontractor mobilization activities, ENSR will notify the Joint Utility Locating
Information for Excavators (JULIE) service (the subsurface utility clearance service for the state of
2-3
December.zoo,
j_Vg*0SelsW100110049-City of ElOffes6wl PukPMAM
ENM.
Illinois) to arrange utility clearance for the site prior to initiating drilling and sampling activities.
ENSR will also request available site surveys and utility layout drawings from.City personnel so that
unmarked utility lines and other infrastructure features can be located.
As part of Task 300 sampling activities, ENSR will advance soil borings to depths of 12 feet below
grade using direct push technology. Two soil samples will be collected from each boring, based on
photoionization detector (PID), olfactory, and visual screening, to delineate the vertical and
horizontal extent of impacted soils. One soil sample from each borehole will target the upper 3-foot
interval of the soils, while the second sample will assess subsurface conditions below 3 feet. Soil
samples will be selected for laboratory analysis based on field screening results and geologic
characterization. Soil boring locations will be finalized in the field once the utility and infrastructure
layouts are evaluated.
Soils generated during drilling activities will be returned to the boreholes. If the borehole collapses
or if the soil cannot be returned for other reasons, the soil will be placed in a 55-gallon DOT
approved steel drum and labeled with the contents. The costs to characterize,contain,and dispose
of the containerized soil are not included in this proposal.
Table 2-1 below summarizes the scope of the soil investigation efforts that are included in our
proposed costs.
2-4
JiPmposaWP1M10049-City of E10Wesfi al Pade.pm.doc December.2001
EPM.
Table 2-1 —Proposed Soil Sampling and Analytical Plan
Site '` No:Soil "=No:Z6il:: `Analytical = Laboratory
borings "Samples Parameters Methods
AUSEPA)
Festival Park Site 8 16 VOCs 8260
PNAs 8270
Priority Pollutant 6000/7000
Metals(13)
pH 9040
Townhome 7 14 VOCs 8260
Redevelopment Site
PNAs 8270
Priority Pollutant 6000/7000
Metals(13)
pH 9040
PCBs 8082
Crocker Theatre Site 3 6 VOCs 8260
PNAs 8270
Priority Pollutant 6000/7000
Metals(8)
pH 9040
PCBs 8082
2-5
December.2001
twwpnalsWIM10049-City oiegjnT""Parkom.aoc
E1�9t.
rMUTWOMM
The above list of analytical parameters is based on the SRP guidelines and assumes that the IEPA
will accept the Phase I ESAs as appropriate evidence that pesticides and herbicides, or other
constituents.not listed above,are not an issue at the sites.
Task 400—Area-wide Groundwater Assessment
Based on ENSR's preliminary review of the Phase 1 ESA reports and preliminary Phase II study
conducted at the redevelopment sites,an area-wide groundwater assessment is recommended. To
ENSR's knowledge, none of the previous investigation efforts have addressed groundwater to
determine if it is impacted above applicable standards. ENSR believes that this is a necessary step
considering the documented environmental conditions cited in the Phase I reports, the known
historical groundwater issues at the Riverboat complex adjacent to the sites, and the relatively
shallow groundwater depth identified by the Preliminary Phase Il Environmental Investigation
(Patrick Engineering, 10/4/01).
Since all three of the redevelopment sites are contiguous (excluding the public right of ways for.
streets), ENSR recommends an area-wide groundwater assessment that will encompass all three
parcels as a single study area. Provided groundwater conditions are found to be generally similar
for all three sites,this area-wide groundwater approach will reduce the cost of the initial assessment
activity. If individual parcels are shown to have unique groundwater issues (i.e. different
contaminants of concern)then additional groundwater characterization efforts may be required.
To characterize groundwater quality and flow direction, ENSR will construct seven groundwater
monitoring wells, obtain water level measurements and collect groundwater samples- In addition,
groundwater field measurements (pH,dissolved oxygen, redox potential and specific conductance)
will be measured down-well using a calibrated field probe to help evaluate the geochemistry of the
groundwater.
Groundwater samples collected from each well will be analyzed for the analytical parameters listed
in Table 2-2 below.
2-6
J.Vmpos W1W10049-City dE19kffeS0va1Paikym.0ot December,2001
Table 2-2 —Proposed Groundwater Assessment Plan
I No.Groundwater. Analytical Parameters Laboratory:Method(USEPA)
Samples
_.
7 VOCs 8260
r 7 PNAs 8270
r
7 Priority Pollutant Metals(13) 6000/7000
7 pH 9040
The above list of analytical parameters is based on the SRP guidelines and assumes that the IEPA
will accept the Phase I ESAs as appropriate evidence that pesticides and herbicides, or other
constituents not listed above,are not an issue at the sites.
Task 500—Site Investigation Reports
ENSR will prepare individual Site Investigation Reports(SIRs)to address recognized environmental
conditions and constituents of concern (COCs) identified during the site investigation activities
described in Tasks 300 and 400. The SIRs will describe field methods and procedures
implemented along with analytical results from soil and groundwater samples collected at each site
in order to characterize the lateral and horizontal extent of COCs at each site.
The SIRs will be prepared in a manner consistent with the SRP regulations(35 III.Adm.Code Part
740) and will include sections applicable to each site. As noted previously, ENSR anticipates that
each SIR will rely upon the results of the area-wide groundwater assessment to address the
characterization of groundwater.
As required by the SRP regulations, the site investigation reports will be prepared under the
direction of and signed by a licensed professional engineer.
Task 600—Remediation Obiectives Report
Based on the results of the site investigation activities, ENSR will determine applicable remediation
objectives(ROs)for the three sites. The development of ROs will be based on the Tiered Approach
to Corrective Action Objectives(TACO) regulations(35 III. Adm. Code Part 742). Further, with the
2-7
J;1P,oposa1s%P1001f0049-City of Elgkffesfival PadLpm.doc December.2001
ENM.
understanding that the parcels will be redeveloped for residential or public park use, ENSR will
focus on developing remediation objectives consistent with residential reuse of the sites.
As the residential clean up objectives are the most stringent standards, ENSR will also consider
and evaluate the potential to apply other provisions of TACO that permit exclusion of exposure
pathways as a means of reducing remedial activities. Based on information known about the sites,
these considerations may include the following:
• Use of engineered barriers to prevent exposure to impacted soils through the soil ingestion and
soil inhalation exposure pathways. Engineered barriers that may be applicable to the sites
include asphalt parking lots,building foundation slabs,or the pavilion structure.
• Use of area background concentrations as screening tools or as remediation objectives.
• Use of institutional controls to restrict groundwater use on the property as a means of excluding
the groundwater ingestion exposure pathway.
For the purpose of this proposal, evaluation of remediation objectives using Tier 2 or Tier 3
methods is not anticipated and not included in the estimated level of effort and cost.
Task 700—Proiect Management/Meetings
To facilitate and expedite the work, ENSR will need to be in regular communication with City
personnel and the developer to ensure that the environmental aspects of the project are
coordinated with other development plans. ENSR will attend two meetings with the City and/or the
developer during the course of the project to facilitate such communication.
Task 700 activities also include time allocation for the ENSR Project Manager and Cost Analyst to
review project costs, schedule, and personnel requirements. As part of this task, ENSR's Project
Manager will contact the City for approving work when work activities are complete or when a
change in the project scope is identified.
2-8
J1Pmposats%PJWJ00e9-City of EWwW"fiVa1 PWk.pm-d= Decembef.2001
t EM.
t 3.0 SRP OVERVIEW AND PROJECT EXPERIENCE
ENSR has assisted several clients in obtaining No Further Remediation (NFR)letters in accordance
with SRP guidelines. The SRP is a voluntary program that was developed to provide persons
performing investigation or corrective action activities, at sites where there was a release of
hazardous substances,the opportunity to demonstrate that environmental conditions do not present
I a significant risk to human health or the environment. An overview of the SRP process is provided
j` below. A summary of ENSR's SRP project experience is presented on Table 3-1.
Site closure within the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency(IEPA) Site Remediation Program
(SRP) requires performing investigation and remedial action tasks in accordance with specific SRP
technical protocols,.conformance.with data quality objectives,and preparation of project documents
in specific formats. Regulations pertaining to the SRP are found in 35 Illinois Administrative Code
} (IAC)Part 740.
Site Remediation Program Process
Under the SRP,the remedial applicant can pursue
either a 'Comprehensive' or 'Focused' No Further . Application
Remediation (NFR) letter. A comprehensive NFR . Site Investigation Report
letter is issued when the applicant has successfully . Remediation Objectives Report
s demonstrated that target compounds listed in 35 Remedial Action Plan
IAC Part 740 Appendix A do not present a Conduct Required Remediation
significant risk to human health or the environment Remedial Action Completion Report
' (i.e.,concentrations are below the 35 IAC Part 742
• Request NFR Letter
Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives).
A focused NFR letter, as the name implies, is based on demonstrating that specific contaminants
from the 35 IAC Part 740 target compound list, or those related to a specific source, have been
remediated to a level that is protective of human health and the environment.
An NFR letter signifies a release from further responsibility under 'the Illinois Environmental
Protection Act and is considered prima facie evidence that the site does not constitute a significant
risk to human health and the environment provided the site is used in accordance with the terms of
the NFR letter. The NFR letter does not become effective until it has been recorded with the
> County Office of the Recorder of Deeds so that it forms a permanent part of the chain of title and
serves as notification to future owners of the terms of the NFR letter.
ENSR's scope of work, as discussed previously in Section 2.0, will address SRP elements
beginning with the SRP application through development of a remediation objectives report A
synopsis of SRP submittal requirements is provided below.
i
3-1 December.2001
jvroppsals)PIOVR1e049-City of Elghl WGs 1 PZkgo_doe
i
-�-
Table 3-1
ILLINOIS SITE REMEDIATION PROGRAM
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECT EXPERIENCE SUMMARY
AG Cdnfidential Confideritial Tepepdat� AG r; F1 k F.btmer AT&T Former AT&T Victory
Communtcatidiis' rrllent Ciient � r Compahy Ct►mtr♦tlnlcat�o aclllit� Facility Auto
a ' ns
Tasks Performed by ENSR
On Behalf of Client r' yKan�Cakee ` , Prophetsbwrt' y; 3ariip,Yt IJohilsi,�r,,'y, Skokie Morton Grove Bensenville
r +:�, .�....
Comprehensive X X
Focused X X X X X X
SRP Tasks
Completed SRP Application X X X X X X X X
Prepared SI Workplan X X X X X X X
Implemented SI X X X X X X X X
Prepared SI Report X P X X X X X X
Prepared RO Report P X X X
Prepared RAP X X X X X X
Implemented RAP X X X X X P
Prepared RACR P P P X X X X
Implemented RACR P X X X X P
Obtained NFR Letter P P P X P X X P
Activities Related to TACO
Implemented Source Area Removal X
Pilot or Full Scale Remediation X X X X
Demonstrated Natural Attenuation P X X X
Tier 1 RO Lookup X X X X X X X X
Calculated Tier 2 RO X
Fate&Transport Modeling(Tier 3) X P X X X _
Risk Assessment(Tier 3) X __--
Modification of Parameters(Tier 3) X X X _
Excluded Pathways X X X X P
Utilized Groundwater Ordinance/MOU X P X X P
Installed Engineered Barrier P X P_... .. .
X—Work Activity Complete
P—Activity Planned for Future
I
EN
3.1 SRP Application
The application is structured such that it provides IEPA with general information regarding the site
and surrounding properties, description of current and proposed post-remediation uses for the site
and whether the site is pursuing a comprehensive or focused NFR letter. SRP Form DRM-1 is
used for this purpose.
3.2 Site Investigation Report
The Site Investigation Report (SIR) will address recognized environmental conditions and
contaminants of concern identified during site investigation activities conducted at each site.
Existing data along with data obtained in the supplemental investigation proposed in Section 2.0 will
be used to identify risk to human health and the environment, determine site-specific remediation
objectives, select cost effective and technically feasible remedial altematives and to
develop/implement a Remedial Action Plan.
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment(ESA) is a general requirement of the SRP whenever a
l comprehensive NFR is being sought. The existing Phase I ESA reports, as listed in Appendix A,
Will be used to provide this information to the Agency.
3.3 Remediation Objectives Report
A Remediation Objectives Report (ROR) is required by an applicant to the SRP to address
recognized environmental conditions and related contaminants of concern identified during the
comprehensive site investigation. The ROR presents project remediation objectives developed in
accordance with 35 IAC Part 742,Tiered Approach to Corrective action Objectives(TACO).
Under TACO, a remedial applicant has the option Options under TACO for Developing
of using site-specific conditions and remediation Site Remediation Objectives
goals (residential or industrial/commercial) to
evaluate site risks and remediation objectives Tier 1 `Look Up Tables'
j (ROs) • Tier 2 Calculated Objectives
• Tier 3 Risk Assessment Models
Each of the TACO options is described briefly Each Exclusion
i below. a Area Backaround Concentrations
• Tier 1 provides a set of "look-up" tables that provide baseline ROs for both residential and
` commerciaUndustrial land use. The industrial/commercial objectives, based on exposure
duration and other risk factors, are less stringent and subsequently higher than the residential
ROs.
3-2
JVMP0saWT10011W49-City of EIgnW=Wa1 PW4M.d= Decembu,2001
EWR
• Tier 2 provides a set of equations and default assumptions that can be used in conjunction with
a limited number of site-specific soil and groundwater parameters to develop site-specific ROs.
t Tier 3 allows use of detailed fate and transport and risk assessment models for the
development of site-specific ROs along with other technical rationales for site closure.
• Exclusion of-exposure pathways is based on Environmental Land Use Controls
f source control coupled with the use of
environmental land use controls (ELUC) to
limit human exposure through a given • Ordinance Restricting the Use of
pathway. If an exposure route is excluded Groundwater
from consideration, then no numeric cleanup • Engineered Barrier
objective need be developed for that • Institutional Controls
exposure route.
• Area background concentrations for contaminants of concern can be used as the RO when the
background level does not pose an acute threat to human health or the environment.
# The ROR will provide an explanation on how RO are selected or developed, describe the
proposed corrective action strategy, and discuss how the proposed corrective measures will
address recognized environmental conditions.
3.4 Remedial Action Plan
it
F A Remedial Action Plan (RAP) addresses the scope and schedule for implementing remedial
3
activities. The RAP generally includes a statement of remediation objectives, provides a description
of remedial technologies selected, and includes a confirmation sampling program to document the
t performance of the remedial action method(s)selected.
f
ENSR has not included costs for development of a RAP at this point in time. Development of a
technically feasible and.cost effective RAP will be contingent on results of the site investigation
program described in Section 2.0 and subsequent development of site-specific ROs. The RAP will
also need to consider other constraints and site limitations that may be imposed by the City based
} on development schemes planned for the two redevelopment sites. Conversely, some of the
I proposed redevelopment plans, such as construction of parking lots, may affect the selection of
remedial methods for each of the sites.
t
i
1
E
i
f 3-3
J_-PMP0s2ftIPI IW49-Ciyof E1ginIFes4vNPa*4".d=
December,2001
1
EMIR
3.5 Remedial Action Completion Report
The Remedial Action Completion Report (RACR) will provide a summary of the remediation
objectives developed for the subject sites, project objectives, narrative description of remedial
measures implemented at the site and statement regarding any environmental land use controls
that are being relied upon to meet project objectives and TACO requirements. The RACR will also
include a request for a NFR letter.
l
w
' 3-4
FF�r JiPmposa1s1P100110619-C71yof EWwffes5valPWk.p doC December,2001
W
r
ENTo
4.0 PROJECT TEAM AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT
4.1 Project Team
ENSR believes the successful completion of any project involves careful selection of project staff to
perform work that is within their realm of expertise. Based on the scope of work described in this
proposal and the request for experience within the Illinois SRP, ENSR has selected a Project Team
comprised of experienced project management and senior technical staff to lead the investigation
and remediation of the Festival Park sites. Each member of the project team has specific, project-
related experience conducting site investigation and remediation under Illinois EPA's SRP. These
projects have made extensive and creative use of the TACO regulations to achieve cost-effective
site closure.
A summary of qualifications for key individuals and their anticipated role on the project is provided in
the section below. Additional experience information and technical qualifications in the form of
professional resumes is available upon request
Principal in Charge/Senior Program Manager—John M.Nardozzi,P.E.
Mr. Nardozzi will serve as Principal in Charge and Senior Program Manger with overall
responsibility for project direction and quality control. Mr. Nardozzi has over 22 years of
professional service in the environmental field and has managed numerous site remediation
projects in Illinois. Mr. Nardozzi is a registered professional engineer in Illinois and has extensive
experience working with regulators at.the Illinois EPA. Mr. Nardozzi has managed a variety of
remediation projects including assessment and closure of petroleum and solvent impacted sites.
This experience includes directing a large-scale investigation and remediation program for a 45-
acre electronics manufacturing facility in Montgomery, Illinois. Working through the Illinois Site
Remediation Program, source area soil and groundwater remediation was accomplished on a fast
track basis. In addition, Mr. Nardozzi has assisted the City of Elgin with site closure at several
underground storage tank sites that have been issued a NFR letters by the Illinois EPA.
As Program Manager for the City of Elgin,Mr. Nardozzi will be responsible for management of both
the technical and financial aspects of the project He will provide direction to staff members that are
implementing the various tasks and monitor the completion of those tasks with respect to the
project schedule and budget Mr. Nardozzi will be the primary contact between the City, the site
developer,the Illinois EPA and the ENSR project team.
Site Investigation Manager—Eric R.Powley
Mr. Powley has 11 years of professional experience on a wide variety of environmental projects.
The majority of these projects have been related to subsurface soil and groundwater investigation,
underground storage tank removals and remediation, and remediation of soil and groundwater
4-1
J-PwposalsVI 110009-Uyol Elgb feafval PWkPMdx DeOembter.2001
E?M_
contamination. Mr. Powley also has experience in remediation system design, including soil vapor
extraction and air stripping, and providing guidance on environmental regulatory compliance. Mr.
f Powley has been involved with the investigation and closure of several City of Elgin.underground
f storage tank sites.
I QA/QC Manager/Senior Geologist-John Hyder,PG
` Mr. Hyder is a licensed Professional Geologist with 11 years of multi-disciplinary environmental
experience. Mr. Hyder has managed and conducted many site investigations to determine the
nature and extent of contamination as well as feasibility studies and remediation activities at
industrial manufacturing facilities and municipal and industrial waste disposal facilities. Mr. Hyder
has also assisted clients in receiving NFR letters from both the Illinois Site Remediation Program
and Illinois Underground Storage Tank Program.
t
Mr.Hyder will be responsible for reviewing project deliverables and ensuring that all work is
performed with appropriate levels of quality control review.
Regulatory Specialist—Dennis Sopcich, P.E.
Mr. Sopcich has been selected to serve.as the Task Manager for data evaluation based on the
i Illinois Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives(TACO) regulations. Mr. Sopcich has more
than 20 years experience in conducting and managing a"wide range of Civil Engineering and
'. environmental projects. These projects included voluntary cleanup actions, due diligence
i assessments of industrial facilities, wastewater permitting, and RCRA closure. Technical areas of
expertise include the application of risk-based corrective action methods for closure of leaking
± underground storage tank (LUST) sites, RCRA Closure, and voluntary cleanup sites. Risk-based
protocols used include Superfund Soil Screening Levels (SSLs), ASTM E 1739-95 Risk-Based
Corrective Action for Petroleum Sites (RBCA), and Illinois Tiered Approach to Cleanup Objectives
(TACO)regulations.
i
Field and Project Support Staff
6
i
In addition to the above senior staff,specific project tasks will be implemented by field and support
staff under the supervision and direction of the Program Manager. Available field staff will conduct
3 the site investigation work and office support staff will assist with the development of project
deliverables. Personnel assigned to these roles will have substantial prior experience and training
in the respective work assignment. All work will be reviewed by senior personnel in accordance
with the project quality control program.
4-2
JV"posaWP700110049-qty of E1*ff*Sbvz1PWkPM.d0c Deoember,2001
q
EMIR
5.0 BUDGET TERMS AND ASSUMPTIONS
5.1 Budget Estimate
ENSR proposes to conduct the scope of work described in Tasks 100 through 700 of this proposal
on a Time & Materials Basis in accordance with our Standard Terms and General Conditions
(Attachment B). The estimated base cost to execute the work described in Section 2.0 is
$63,173. A summary of estimated project costs by task is presented in Table 5-1. Table 5-2
presents the proposed hourly billing rates for ENSR personnel and mark ups applicable to Other
Direct Costs.
5.2 Cost Assumptions
ENSR's cost estimate presented in Table 5-1 was developed using the following assumptions.
• All borings and monitoring wells will be advanced on property owned by the City. ENSR has
not included costs to obtain permits to drill in utility right-of-ways or privately owned properties.
• The proposed costs assume three 8-hour days on site with the drilling contractor for the
advancement of soil borings and monitoring we11 construction and sampling.
• Neither ENSR nor its subcontractors are responsible for the replacement of utilities that are
unknown or that are not marked by the local utility clearance service (JULIE) or the City unless
such utilities are damaged as a result of ENSR or its subcontractor's negligence or willful
misconduct
• . Fieldwork will be performed under reasonable weather conditions and without major weather
delays. No costs have been included for unusually severe weather conditions or access
difficulties.
• Work will occur during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, based on 8-hour
workdays. ENSR has also assumed that we will have access to all drilling locations.
• Investigation Derived Wastes (IDW) generated as a result of onsite work will be containerized
by ENSR and its subcontractors. Costs for character¢ation and disposal are not included in
this proposal
• ENSR's estimated cost to prepare the SRP project deliverables is based on our experience on
similar projects. Site investigation and report costs are dependent on the type and extent of
contamination that is identified at the sites. For the purpose of the preliminary cost estimates
presented herein, ENSR has assumed that the existing Phase II ESA has defined the
5-1
JVMP0UW1=10049-Gty d Ek*WesivW Pwk4xc.doc
December,2001
EN.yt
constituents of concern(primarily petroleum-related compounds). If additional sources,or other
constituents of concern, are identified during the project, then the estimated costs can be
expected to increase to account for additional investigative and reporting efforts.
• ENSR and its subcontractors will take reasonable care and precaution to minimize the impact of
the drilling equipment on the landscaped areas of the three sites. However, ENSR will not be
responsible for damage to landscape materials or turf, unless caused by our negligence or lack
of reasonable care while conducting field activities.
• The City will provide adequate.property boundary surreys with legal descriptions for the three
sites to properly record the NFR letters.
• All laboratory analytical work will be performed at standard(five to seven day)turnaround times.
5.3 Authorization
ENSR believes our project team has the experience, depth of resources, and management
approach to successfully achieve the City of Elgin's objectives. We trust this proposal meets your
requirements and we look forward to the opportunity to present our experience and approach to
you. Please acknowledge your acceptance of this proposal by signing and returning the attached
Acceptance of Proposal Form found with the Commercial Terms and General Conditions in
Attachment B.
5-2
J-PwPOSQWP1M10W9-Oly d El*ff"Oval Puk4m.Cx
December.2001
TABLE 5- 1
Level of Effort and Cost Estimate
lFestival Park Redevelopment Sites
City of Elgin
10049-A021R190010
Prop.Mgr J.Nardozzi
Labor
TASKS Mrs. Labor ODCs Subs SUBTOTAL
f100 SRP/Regulatory Coord. 30 3,520 476 0 3,996
200 Sl Work Plan 41 4,004 _T 160 0 4,164
i 300 Soil Investigation 30 2,790 610 14,042H 17,441
400 Groundwater Assessment 58 4,996 797 6,233 12,025
500 Site Investigation Reports(3) 138 11,832 473 0 12,305
600 RORITACO Evaluation 64 5,940 238 _ 0 6,178
700 Coord.&Mtgs. 57 6,645 _ 419 0 7,064
Category Totals. 418 39,727 3,172 20,274 63,173
PROJECT TOTAL: 63,173
Table 5-2
Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates
City of Elgin
i
Labor Category Billing Rate
P4 $45.00
P5 $55.00
P7 $65.00
P8 $73.00
P9 $82.00
NO $87.00
P11 $93.00
P12 $105.00
P13 $120.00
P15 $130.00
CS To Be Quoted
ELM
! Bibliography
The following reports and documents were relied upon by ENSR in the development of this
proposal:
• Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report For the Property Located at 96-122 South
Grove Avenue(Crocker Theatre Site), Elgin, IL,Patrick Engineering, Inc., September 2001.
• Updated Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report For the Property Located at the
Southeast Comer of South Grove Avenue and Prairie Street(Proposed Townhomes
Redevelopment Site), Elgin, IL, Patrick Engineering, Inc.,August 2001.
• Updated Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report For the Property Located at the
' Southwest Comer of South Grove Avenue and Prairie Street(Proposed Festival Park Site),
Elgin, IL,Patrick Engineering, Inc.,August 2001.
• Phase I Environmental Site Assessment,Vacant Parcel, Southeast Comer of Prairie Street
and Grove Avenue, Elgin, IL, LFR Levine-Fricke, March 29, 2001.
• Report of Preliminary Phase II Environmental Investigations, Festival Paris Area, Patrick
Engineering, Inc., October 4, 2001.
j
j
{
gi
1
t
t
r.
l
L
J:W'oposa1,00'100t9-cay d r:4ir"es.po*. .0oc
f December,2001
I:
JiW17-2002 0005 630 836 1863 630 836 1863 P.07
Ok
EXHIBIT B
Project Schedule
ENSR will initiate work on the project immediately upon receipt of authorization to
proceed from the City.
ENSR understands the City's desire to expedite work on this assignment to meet
deadlines associated with the development agreement being contemplated by
the City and a development firm. Based on these understandings, ENSR will
provide services as follows:
Task 100—SRP Application/Regulatory Consultation
ENSR will prepare for City review and approval a Site Remediation Program
Application (Form DRM-1)within 30 days.
Regulatory consultation will be on-going through the course of the project in
response to (EPA questions and comments. The total time period of the project,
including site investigation and reporting, is anticipated to be six months.
Task 200—Site Investigation Work Plan
ENSR will prepare the Site Investigation Work Plan for submittal to the IEPA
Within 30 days.
�* JiAtt V 2002 00=02 630 836 1863 630 836 1863 P.02
ENSR International
27755 Diem Road
Warrenvik IL 665553998
(830)8367700
FAX(630)836-1717
January 17, 2002 wMensrcom
ENSR Proposal No. 10049-A02
Mr. Raymond H. Moller
Director of Economic Development and Business Services
City of Elgin
150 Dexter Court
Elgin, IL 60120
RE: Festival Park Redevelopment Sites
Dear Ray:
Per your January 140'fax,we are providing a project schedule for the Festival
Park sites and our comments on the proposed Agreement.
To expedite the contract process,we have requested that the City incorporate
several paragraphs from the existing contract between the City and ENSR for
services associated with the Brownfields Redevelopment project. These
selected paragraphs are enclosed along with a marked copy of the agreement.
We appreciate the City's selection of ENSR to provide environmental services for
the Festival Park Redevelopment sites_
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments regarding our
proposed changes to the agreement.
Sincerely,
ENSR Corporation
ohn M. Nardozzi, P.E.
Department Manager
Remedial Engineering
Enclosures: Marked copy of Agreement
Project Schedule—Exhibit B
Over 30 Years of Excellence in Environmental Services