97-61 Resolution No . 97-61
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AMENDED FACADE IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM STICKLING
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN,
ILLINOIS, that Robert O. Malm, Interim City Manager, and
Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk, be and are hereby authorized and
directed to execute an Amended Facade Improvement Program
Agreement on behalf of the City of Elgin with William
Stickling for facade improvements, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof by reference .
s/ Kevin Kelly
Kevin Kelly, Mayor
Presented: February 26 , 1997
Adopted: February 26 , 1997
Omnibus Vote : Yeas 6 Nays 0
Attest :
s/ Dolonna Mecum
Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk
r � •
CITY OF ELGIN
AMENDED FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this �� day of
�. y'L 1997, by and between the City of Elgin,
llin�isa munic ipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as
"City" ) , and William Stickling, (hereinafter referred to as
"Owner" ) .
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have previously entered into
an agreement dated June 12, 1996 , a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof as Attachment "A" (hereinafter
referred to as "Agreement" ) ; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have each determined it to be
in their best interests to amend Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable
mutual consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree to amend the
terms of Agreement as follows:
1 . Section 1 of Agreement is amended to provide that
City shall pay to Owner the sum of $150,823 .
The remainder of Agreement shall remain in full effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
agreement on the date first appearing above.
OWNER CIT GIN
B
William Stickling y:—Ro b rt 0. Malm
Inte im City Manager
Attest:
—iQa
Dolonna Mecum, i Clerk
CITY OF ELGIN
FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 12th day of
June, 1996, by and between the City of Elgin, Illinois, a
municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City" ) , and
William Stickling, (hereinafter referred to as "Owner" ) .
WHEREAS, City has established a facade improvement
program (hereinafter referred to as "Program" ) for application
within certain areas of the corporate limits of City
designated by City as appropriate for such application
(hereinafter referred to as "Rehabilitation Areas" ) ; and
WHEREAS, Program is administered and funded solely by
City for purposes of the control and prevention of blight,
dilapidation and deterioration of Rehabilitation Areas; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Program, City has undertaken to
share the cost of facade improvements to certain structures
within Rehabilitation Areas, pursuant to the criteria set
forth herein; and
WHEREAS, City has retained or shall retain the services
of an architectural consultant (hereinafter referred to as
"Consultant" ) to provide participants in Program with certain
conceptual design work regarding proposed improvements,
including, but not necessarily limited to, a color rendering
of draft improvement nocost designs
to and an of work
specifications at
WHEREAS, Owner owns at least 50% of a commercial
building(s) , or is the tenant of a commercial building(s)
located within a Rehabilitation Area, and Owner desires to
participate in Program pursuant to the terms and provisions of
this agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises is
and covenants conead the parties hereto sufficiency which agree as
hereby acknowledg ,
follows :
Section 1 . City shall pay
to Owner the sum of
$103 , 442 . 50 for facade improvement approved pursuant to the reered to as
provisions of this agreement (her to 44erfe tfofrsttorefront
"Eligible Costs" ) , consisting of up
for the structure(s) referred to at Section 16 herein
(hereinafter referred to as "Structure" ) . All parties hereto
d for herein shall be
agree that all payments from City provide
made to William Stickling, who shall provide City with a full
release upon receipt.
Section 2 . Eligible costs shall include labor,
material and equipment costs, and such other costs as may be
reasonably necessary for the execution and completion of the
facade improvement hereby provided for (hereinafter referred
to as "Work" ) as designated from the design drawings and
specifications approved by the Project Review Team pursuant to
the provisions of Section 3 herein and prepared by
Consultant (hereinafter referred to as "Plans" ) , which design
Plans are attached hereto and made a part as
Attachment "A" .
Section 3 . No Work shall be undertaken or shall be
considered to constitute the basis for an Eligible Cost until
the design for such Work has been submitted to and approved in
writing by the Project Review Team, consisting of the Director
of the New Century Partnership for Elgin, an Illinois
not-for-profit corporation, City' s Historic Preservation
Specialist, and City' s Rehabilitation Specialist. Such desigh
shall include, but not be limited to, a date certain by whc
the Work shall be completed. In no event shall such work be
completed more than one hundred eighty ( 180) days from the
date of this agreement, without the written consent of the
Application Review Team.
Section 4 . The Project Review Team shall be permitted
access to Structure to periodically review the progress of the
Work. Such review shall not be in lieu of any other
inspections which may otherwise be required by law or by
City. Any and all portions of the Work which do not, in the
sole discretion of the Project Review Team, conform to the
Plans or other applicable terms of this Agreement, shall be
made to conform to the Plans and other applicable terms of
this agreement upon written notice of the existence of such
non-conforming portions .
Section 5 . Upon completion of the Work, and upon final
inspection and written approval by the Project Review Team and
such other final inspections and approvals as may be required
by law, Owner shall submit to City: ( 1) an executed, notarized
itemized contractor statement reflecting the total cost of the
Work and each portion thereof, including, but not limited to,
or
the cost of labor (whether provided by any ccontractor
all
subcontractor) , materials and equipment;
bids , contracts and invoices submitted, executed or incur reed
pursuant to the Work; and ( 3) reasonable proof of paym
all costs incurred pursuant to the Work.
Section 6 . City shall pay to Owner the sum provided
for at Section 1 herein within thirty ( 30 ) days of Owner' s
compliance with e the amountl paid to Owner Section exceed a the amount
event shall
specified in this agreement or in the contractor statement.
-2-
Section 7 . In the event Owner fails to complete the
Work in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, or
otherwise breaches the terms of this Agreement, city may
terminate this Agreement upon written notice of breach and
termination to Owner, and any and all financial or other
obligations on the part of City shall cease and become null
and void.
Section 8 . Upon completion of the Work, and for a
period of five (5) years thereafter, owner shall properly
maintain the Work in its finished form, without alteration or
change thereto, and shall not ent'er into any agreement, or
take any other steps to alter, change or remove such Work, or
to create or undertake any other work which may constitute a
deviation from the Plans, without prior written approval from
the Project Review Team in its sole discretion.
Section 9 . Nothing herein is intended to limit,
restrict or prohibit the Owner from undertaking any other work
in or about the subect premises which is unrelated to the
facade improvement provided for in this Agreement.
Section 10 . This Agreement shall be binding upon City
and its successors, and upon Owner, Owner' s successors and
assigns for a period of five ( 5) years from and after the date
of completion and approval of the work. Owner shall o provide
subsequent Owner(s) of structure with a copy
Agreement. This Agreement shall run with the land underlying
structure.
Section 11 . If Owner does not own the underlying
property for which work is being done, Owner warrants and
represents to City that Owner has a lease at the location for
which the work is there war ants and represents that six
he has
years . Owner fur property for
received authorization from all owners of the prop Y
am
which work is to be done to accept funds under this of gram
and to undertake the work. Further, such owner(s)
property for which work is to be done hereby acknowledges that
he is aware of this Agreement and authorizes the work
the property
to be made to the structure. Said owner( s) of
for which improvements are to be' made further kn w edges
that, as owner of the property, he is a party
Agreement and is bound by the provisionsta0 Provisionsemenof
specifically, but not limited to,
Section 6 of this Agreement. Each "Owner" signature hereto
hereby warrants and represents that there are no other
entities having an ownership interest in the structure, which
have not executed this agreement.
Section 12 . Owner hereby holds harmless and
indemnifies City from and against any and all causes of
action, suits, claims for damages, and any and all other
liability which may arise out of or in connection with Owner' s
-3-
• or Owner' s agents, employees and assigns ' negligent
performance of any of the terms of this Agreement.
Section 13 . This agreement shall not be construed to
create a partnership, joint venture or employment relationship
between the parties hereto.
Section 14 . This agreement shall be subject to and
governed by the laws of the State of Illinois . The parties
hereto hereby agree that venue for any and all actions which
may be brought by each and either of them to enforce the
provisions of this agreement shall be in Kane County, Illinois .
Section 15 . The terms of this Agreement shall be
severable. In the event that any of the terms or provisions
of this Agreement are deemed to be void or otherwise
unenforceable for any reason, the remainder of this agreement
shall remain in full force and effect .
Section 16 . Cwner' s Name: William R_ Stickling
Address : 100 East Chicago Street
City: Elgin State: IL zip Code: 60120
Telephone Number: (847) 742-8939
Property Location: 100 East Chicago Street
Ownership Interest: owner
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this
agreement on the date first appearing above .
OWNER CITY OF ELGIN
f y i
�By t
GG�! � B
William Stickling •Richard Helwig
City Manager
Attest:
h �..._
Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk
-4-
I i
IRR nil
n
WEST ELEVATION (PROPOSED)
tea-.
I I I I
I
u �
ONO
i
3 EAST ELEVATION (PROPOSED)
A 4.1
i
l l
ILL
Z SOUTH ELEVATION (PROPOSED)
T-O-
FACADE IMPROVEMENT PROGR-AM
PROJECT COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT: 100 East Chicago Street (Phase I )
ITEM COST ESTIM-zkTE
$ 6 , 500 . 00
Demolition 10 , 200 . 00
Tuckpointing 9 , 000 . 00
Brick Cleaning 52 , 000 . 00
New Storefront Windows 10 _ , 500 . 00
Stonework 3 , 500 . 00
Interior Finish $185 , 700 . 00
27 , 855 . 00
Contingency-15%
Total Project Estimate
$213 , 555 - 00
*This cost may vary if a historic window profile is
selected.
PROJECT: 100 East Chicago Street (Phase II)
Total Phase II Estimate: $81, 995
Committee of the Whole Meeting
November 6 , 1996
Page 2
to $18,510, which is the cost for the elevator repairs . Yeas :
Councilmembers Gavin, McKevitt, Schock, Walters, and Mayor
Kelly. Nays : Councilmembers Gilliam and Yearman.
The vote on the amended motion was as follows : Yeas :
Councilmembers Gavin, Gilliam, McKevitt, Schock, Walters ,
Yearman, and Mayor Kelly. Nays : None.
Request from William Stickling for Additional Assistance on
the Facade Program at 100 E Chicago Street (Tower Building)
Councilman Gilliam made a motion, seconded by Councilman
Walters, to provide additional financial assistance for the
aforesaid facade program as set forth in Scenario B, which
includes the City funding the total project cost at 35% plus
paying the entire cost of the clock repair in the approximate
amount of $10, 000 . Yeas : Councilmembers Gilliam, Schock, and
Walters . Nays : Councilmembers Gavin, McKevitt, Yearman, and
Mayor Kelly.
Councilman McKevitt made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman
Yearman, to provide additional financial assistance for the
aforesaid facade program as set forth in Scenario A, which
includes the clock repair being part of the total project cost
funded by the City at 35% . Yeas : Councilmembers Gavin,
McKevitt, Schock, Walters, Yearman, and Mayor Kelly. Nays :
Councilman Gilliam.
Report on the Elgin Recreation Center Task Force
Councilmembers Gavin and McKevitt summarized the task force' s
report. Discussion was held regarding the findings of the task
force, the need for services to Elgin' s youth, and the need for
developing other funding sources and alternatives .
Councilman McKevitt made a motion, seconded by Councilman Gavin,
to approve the task force' s recommendations to reject the Elgin
Recreation Center and contingency proposals and to maintain the
City' s current level of funding for Elgin Recreation Center.
Yeas : Councilmembers Gavin, Gilliam, McKevitt, Schock, Walters,
Yearman and Mayor Kelly. Nays : None.
Radio Service Maintenance Agreement with Motorola
Councilman Walters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Schock,
to enter into an agreement with Motorola for a seven-year period
ending September 30 , 2003, for maintenance and disaster recovery
for the City' s radio system. Yeas : Councilmembers Gavin,
Gilliam, McKevitt, Schock, Walters, Yearman and Mayor Kelly.
Nays : None.
Agenda Item No.
t City of Elgin
November 1, 1996
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Robert O. Malm, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: Request From William Stickling For Additional
Assistance on Facade Program
PURPOSE
present a request from William R. Stickling, owner of 100
To Street, for additional financial assistance for a
East Chicago
facade project.
BACKGROUND
8, 1996, the Elgin City Council approved a project under
On May g ro erty at 100
the City' s Facade Improvement coyP known as r the Tower Building.
East Chicago Street, roved from
Funding for the project rebate was identified and app
two sources:
$60,750.00--Downtown Redevelopment Fund
( Account No. 350-0000-795.78-99)
$42,692 .50-�RAccounttNo. 276-0000-791.78-03)
Use of the Riverboat Fund dollars was a decision as d n upon a
request from Mr. Stickling to fund the of the work per-
rather than a phased approach with a portion
uld
formed in 1997 . The existing Downtown Redevelopment Fund aximum
not accommodate the entire project amount in 1996 .
rebate of $103,442 .50 was approved. This rebate was calculated
project estimate based upon discussions with
on the architect's
contractors on work to be p erformed. The project estimate at
that time was $295,550.
Once work got underway, discoveries were made which could not stimate
have been foreseen for the original ecutting •and dshaping lstonee
work became necessary which invo
replacing or anchoring stones on upper levels and dealing with
Project
missing structural features. 10000 for repair f the a terior
(0'" $430,922. This also includes $ that the City assume full cost
clock. Mr. Stickling is as
of the clock repair. See attached letter. A breakdown of
project cost is also provided.
Additional Facade Program Assistance
November 1, 1996
Page 2
COMMiJNITY GROUPS/INTERESTED PERSONS CONTACTED
None.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
To date, the City Council has approved $103,442 .50 in rebates
for the project at 100 East Chicago Street.
Scenario A Scenario B
430,922 .00 $ 420,922 .00
Estimated Project Costs 35$ 35%
Rebate Percentage $ 150,823 .00 $ 147 , 323 .00
Eligible Rebate Nip, 10, 000 .00
Clock Repair @ 100% $ 150,823.00 $ 157 ,323 . 00
Approved Rebate ( 103,442 .5
Less Previously App 5
0) (103,442 . 0
Additional Funds Requested 47 ,380 .50 ; 53,880 . 50
Scenario A shows the clock repair being funded as part of the
total project cost at 35% • Scenario CBtyshows the entire cost of
the clock repair being fund ed Y the
Possible funding sources include unprogrammed 1996 A verboat
funds or 19d be arequiredrafor( the
100,000
use of unprogrammed river-
amendment would
boat funds.
LEGAL IMPACT
None.
ALTERNATIVES
1 , Approve the request from Mr. Stickling for $53,880 .50 in
additional rebate for the project
assuming full hcosto.of This the
alternative includes th e Y assum
clock repair.
2 . Approve the request from Mr. Stickling for $47 ,350 . 50 in
additional rebate for the project at 100 E. Chicago.
3. Reject the request for additional rebate.
Additional Facade Program Assistance
November 1, 1996
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION
from the City Council with regard to the
Direction is requested
request from Mr. Stickling.
Respectfully submitted,
' qQ
Deborah K. Nier, Director
New Century Partnership
Sarosh Saher
Historic Preservation
Specialist
Ro ert O. Malm
Acting City Manager
dkn/dkm
100 EAST CHICAGO STREET • ELGIN, ILLINOIS 60120
PHONE SHerwood 2-8939
October 3, 1996
Mayor Kevin Kelly and Elgin City Council
City of Elgin
150 Dexter Court
Elgin, Illinois 60120-5555
Re: Request for modification of reimbursement
oration the facade amount from Building
restoration
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Bids for the renovation ubted the foureareain
Tower Building were
general contracting firms that invited to
Lamp
The
amounts of the two bids were: $
Incorporated and $461,300 from Driessen Construction,
Inc. The lower of these figures represented 156% of the
$295 , 550 estimate for the work previously made by the
project.
architect engaged by the City of Elgin for the p j
To save both thto and contractors amounts
of money, I decided onion of the
directly and thuseneralncontractor1whiletgaining tighter
cost of using a q
control of the overall project costs. Sever rev. sly
ad contractors now working =nD=iessen,eCAshdemolition work
submitted bids to Lamp o
progressed the eoriginaldspecificationsw
identified on the original the job was
added to the scope of the project by .the architect, (not
increasing the total cost of the proec $4 with
included in the original bids for the project) .ro ith
most of the contracts now let and work on the project
cost
nearly half completed, it now appears
for the project will be held to $430, 922.
Included in this $430, 922 figure is $10,000 for the
shin of the large brass clock which hangs over
refurbi g
THE
ELGIN
TOWER
ELGIN'S TALLEST AND MOST OUTSTANDING OFFICE BUILDING
Mayor-Kelly and Elgin City Council
October 3, 1996
Page 2
the corner of Chica�heStreet
clock asand
"streetscape"Avenue.
benefiting
architect, viewing
the public rather than mecontemplated that the full cost
building, had originally P
of the clock repairs would be paid by the City. I concur
e from
with this assessment since clock otherlvantage
within the Tower Buil din g► but is
points in the commercial core of downtown.
I place no credence in the often heard story that
when the Tower Building clock begins working again the
Watch Factory will rise from the earth on South Grove,
the Joseph Spiess and Ackemann's stores and the Crocker
Theater will reopen and pedestrian traffic will again be
four abreast on Elgin's downtown sidewalks.prominent
however, feel that the restoration of this p
feature of the Wo�talitytwhichcdowntowndElgineisto
visitors the ne
experiencing. The investment that I am making in
renovating the Tower Building
facade additional
amount which I might ever p
rent and represents my contribution to the revitalization
I would appreciate
of Elgin's Center
thetCit ACounci1 of►the City's
consideration by Y
assumption of the full cost of refurbishing this clock
which serves the public.
In any event, I am enclosing an itemization of the
renovation costs noilpro7rovedthedmodificationyofeghest
that the City Council PP
earlier Facade Improvement Agreement to reflect the
$430 ,922 cost of the project and a maximum reimbursement
if the
to me of 35% of that tf or 8is tolbe,reimbursed) .
full cost of refurbishing the clock
Sincerely,
/WILLIAM R. STICKLING
OoA*a 3.19%
ELGIN TOWER RENOVATION PROJECT
Certificate of Insurance
C m an Bid
Footnote w Bid Tendered
NRY 8/23196
n Contractors Inc. $ 96,000 A $ 96,000
C & C Mason 17,038
Change order (additional stone) 17,038 2 000(est)
Change order (additional stone) 2,000
115,038
DEMOLITION BARACADES & WSC. ITEMS
28,280 A 28,280 8/13/96
Halsey Construction 1,650
Change order (additional demolition) 600(est.)
(Mange order (additional steel columns) .4 800
Change order (See steel doors below) 25,730
D
Bill Buttell
TUCK POINT_& CAULK
Art Seyller 92,800 C
92,570
A 92,570 8/22/96
Spray-O-Bond 25,000(est.)
Change order (stone refastening) 117,570
D
Mid-Continent
Singles Roofing 125,000 C
CP
pAIN'TING OF TOWER WINDOWS GREY
AL
64,500
A 64,500 8/13/96
Fortune
Spray-O-Bond 77,760 C
pAIIV'TiNG OF ENTERANCE (GOLD
Halsey Construction (time & material contract)
A 2,000(est.) 8/13/96
STEEL WINDOWS
29,521 N/
Harmony Metal Fabrication 29,521
pN/A
F
Certificate of Insurance
WorklContractor
Bid Footnote Low Bid Tendered
,.,GLAZING STEEL WINDOWS
Joe's Quality
Glass 5,579 A 5,579
STEEL, DOORS
Halsey Construction 4,800 C
Doors Plus Service
3,693 A 3,693
WnvMOW WALL .
Des Plaines Glass
21,306 A 21,306
Cardinal Glass D
Joe's Quality Glass 25,580 C
AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENERS
Joe's Quality Glass 6,777 C
Door-O-Matic
3,860 D
Stanley (Des Plaines Glass) 3,746 B 3,746
STONE CLEANING
Omni Commercial Services 12,290 C
Power Shower, Inc.
A 4,100
Spray-O-Bond (entire bldg.) 17,500 C
CLOCK REFURBIsEONG
Triangle Sign Co.
B 10,000
Elgin Clock Repair D
$402,783
5% contingency 20,139
Coordination and supervision payroll ---8.0-00
Total $430,922
Footnotes:
A - Contract let
B - Contract anticipated to be let soon
C - Other bids (not used)
D - Bids not in yet
l
EXTRA ITEMS SENT TO CITY COUNCIL
October 18, 1996
Letter to Mayor Kelly and City Council from Bill Stickling re
modification of reimbursement amount from City for facade
restoration of Tower Building
100 EAST CHICAGO STREET • ELGIN, ILLINOIS 60120 PHONE SHerwood 2-8939
October' 3, 1996
Mayor Kevin Kelly and Elgin City Council
City of Elgin
150 Dexter Court
Elgin, Illinois 60120-5555
Re: Request for modification of reimbursement
amount from City of Elgin for the facade
restoration on the Elgin Tower Building
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Bids for the renovation of the facade of the Elgin
Tower Building were submitted by two of the four area
general contracting firms that were invited to bid. The
amounts of the two bids were: $526, 240 from Lamp
Incorporated and $461, 300 from Driessen Construction,
Inc. The lower of these figures represented 156% of the
$295,550 estimate for the work previously made by the
architect engaged by the City of Elgin for the project.
To save both the City and myself substantial amounts
of money, I decided to hire the trade contractors
directly and thus eliminate a significant portion of the
cost of using a general contractor while gaining tighter
control of the overall project costs. Several of the
contractors now working on the project had previously
submitted bids to Lamp or Driessen. As demolition work
progressed the need for additional stone work not
identified on the original specifications for the job was
added to the scope of the project by the architect,
increasing the total cost of the project by $46, 288 (not
included in the original bids for the project) . With
most of the contracts now let and work on the project
nearly half completed, it now appears that the total cost
for the project will be held to $430, 922.
O
Included in this $430, 922 figure is $10,000 for the
refurbishing of the large brass clock which hangs over
THE
ELGIN
TOWER
ELGIN'S TALLEST AND MOST OUTSTANDING OFFICE BUILDING
Mayor Kelly and Elgin City Council
October 3, 1996
Page 2
the corner of Chicago Street and Douglas Avenue. The
architect, viewing the clock as "streetscape" benefiting
the public rather than merely an ornament on the
building, had originally contemplated that the full cost
of the clock repairs would be paid by the City. I concur
with this assessment since the clock is not visible from
within the Tower Building, but is from most other vantage
points in the commercial core of downtown.
I place no credence in the often heard story that
when the Tower Building clock begins working again the
Watch Factory will rise from the earth on South Grove,
the Joseph Spiess and Ackemann's stores and the Crocker
Theater will reopen and pedestrian traffic will again be
four abreast on Elgin's downtown sidewalks. I do,
however, feel that the restoration of this prominent
feature of the downtown streetscape would convey to
visitors the new vitality which downtown Elgin is
experiencing. The investment that I am making in
renovating the Tower Building facade clearly exceeds any
amount which I might ever hope to recover from additional
rent and represents my contribution to the revitalization
of Elgin's Center City. Accordingly, I would appreciate
consideration by the City Council of the City's
assumption of the full cost of refurbishing this clock
which serves the public.
In any event, I am enclosing an itemization of the
renovation costs now projected and respectfully request
that the City Council approve the modification of the
earlier Facade Improvement Agreement to reflect the
$430, 922 cost of the project and a maximum reimbursement
to me of 35% of that cost, or $150,823 ($157,323 if the
full cost of refurbishing the clock is to be reimbursed) .
Sincerely,
WILLIAM R. STICKLING
October 3,19%
ELGIN TOWER RENOVATION PROJECT
Certificate of Insurance
Company Bid Footnote Low Bid Tendered
MASONRY
C & C Mason Contractors Inc. $ 96,000 A $ 96,000 8/23/96
Change order (additional stone) 17,038 17,038
Change order (additional stone) 2,000 2,000(est.)
115,038
DEMOLMON,BARACADES & NUSC. ITEMS
Halsey Construction 28,280 A 28,280 8/13/96
Change order (additional demolition) 1,650
Change order (additional steel columns) 600(est.)
Change order (See steel doors below) (-4,800)
25,730
Bill Buttell D
TUCK POINT & CAULK
Art Seyller 92,800 C
Spray-O-Bond 92,570 A 92,570 8/22/96
Change order (stone refastening) 25,000(est.)
117,570
Mid-Continent D
Singles Roofing 125,000 C
PAINTING OF TOWER WINDOWS (GREY)
Fortune 64,500 A 64,500 8/13/96
Spray-O-Bond 77,760 C
PARmNG OF ENTERANCE (GOLD)
Halsey Construction (time & material contract) A 2,000(est.) 8/13/96
STEEL WINDOWS
Harmony Metal Fabrication 29,521 A 29,521 N/A
Certificate of Insurance
Work/Contractor Bid Footnote Low Bid Tendered
GLAZING STEEL WINDOWS
Joe's Quality Glass 5,579 A 5,579
STEEL DOORS
Halsey Construction 4,800 C
Doors Plus Service 3,693 A 3,693
WINDOW WALL
Des Plaines Glass 21,306 A 21,306
Cardinal Glass D
Joe's Quality Glass 25,580 C
AUTOMATIC DOOR OPENERS (2)
Joe's Quality Glass 6,777 C
Door-O-Matic 3,860 D
Stanley (Des Plaines Glass) 3,746 B 3,746
STONE CLEANING
Omni Commercial Services 12,290 C
Power Shower, Inc. A 4,100
Spray-O-Bond (entire bldg.) 17,500 C
CLOCK REFURBISHING
Triangle Sign Co. B 10,000
Elgin Clock Repair D
$402,783
5% contingency 20,139
Coordination and supervision payroll 8,000
Total $430,922
Footnotes:
A = Contract let
B = Contract anticipated to be let soon
C = Other bids (not used)
D = Bids not in yet