94-245 Resolution No. 94-245
RESOLUTION
INCORPORATING AREA III IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN FIVE YEAR
FINANCIAL PLAN AND ENGINEERING COSTS IN 1995 BUDGET
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN,
ILLINOIS, that the City Manager is hereby directed to include
Area III improvements in the city' s five year financial plan
and to include the engineering costs for the Area III project
in the 1995 city budget.
s/ Robert Gilliam
Robert Gilliam, Mayor Pro Tem
Presented: August 24, 1994
Adopted: August 24, 1994
Omnibus Vote: Yeas 6 Nays 0
Attest: •
s/ Dolonna Mecum
Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk
n
, ; Agenda Item No.
tko
o' 1�OI�ti e.
1
August 4, 1994
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Richard B. Helwig, City Manager
SUBJECT: Area III Improvement Project Survey
PURPOSE
This memorandum is intended to provide updated results of the
Area III survey.
BACKGROUND
After reporting to the City Council in April, staff was asked
to see if the participation could be increased. In addition
(1114. to neighbors on both sides of the issue attempting to encour-
age responses, a second follow-up mailing was sent to non-re-
spondent property owners using Kane County property records .
Cook County records are available only on microfiche at the
Hanover Township office on an individual property basis and
were not pursued.
COMMUNITY GROUPS/INTERESTED PERSONS CONTACTED
The updated results of the survey for the entire area (Exhib-
it A) show 209 responses with 114 in favor and 95 opposed.
There is a potential 295 addresses (Exhibit B) giving a 71%
response rate. When first reported to the Council there were
144 responses -- 65 in favor and 79 opposed.
The City Council also expressed interest in the effect of
renters responding. Of the ten people saying they were rent-
ers, nine said yes and one said no.
Streets with perhaps the worst roads and the biggest drainage
problems are those in the study area east of and including
Sherwood Avenue. In addition, Elma Avenue is a bus route.
These streets are among the first streets people see coming
C
., •A
Area III Improvement Project Survey
�l August 5, 1994
Page 2
into Elgin. One of the City's large parks, Trout Park, is
adjacent to Trout Park Boulevard. For the area east of Sher-
wood, a 110-84 majority responded (of 278 properties) in
favor of the project.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
A revised financial estimate was prepared for the surveyed
area east of Sherwood Avenue. That estimate is engineering
-of $285,000 in 1995, construction/inspection of $3 . 295 mil-
lion in 1996 for a total of $3.580 million. If 60% were
deemed public benefit, the City' s cost in is estimated to be
approximately $2 . 150 million with an additional $1 .430 mil-
lion from private assessments .
If directed, staff would begin planning for this project as
the next Special Assessment project. Scheduling of the
project would be a part of the five-year financial plan.
RECOMMENDATION
""' Given that this project would greatly improve a neighborhood
that is one of the last without streets built to urban stan-
dards, it recommended that the five-year financial plan
anticipate budgeting for engineering 'of this project in
1995 . Cons ruction would follow after engineering and legal
work is completed)
•
Respec ful ynsubmitted,
/
C y /
JPearson
Budget/Public T ormation Officer
--,i1 la/MC/J / /
James L. Kristiansen
Public Works Director
-4_C1-Q13. /d.)
Richard B. Helwig Al
City Manager
CJP:daw
Attachment
____N----
RD. J 1 ) 4s. ,
� HURON
5RD.
/ 1
i• irRD.
L_--
ISAZ
...1 01; I ir..:; ,AD 1 TROUT ARKBLVD
/ WART o
/ jRGLENW000 p ,.� u W110•�` NW00�� AVE. PARKWAY a > a AVE.
•�.�1p0>��gOe J'4 / OAKDALE Y
G
sp.
/� / OAKHILL RD AVE. ELMA ST. ELMA. c
/ .1 iC—
` ; LUDA ST. cn c c SIOUX DRI a
/ . �� > t-
..-'" ( Z
j W a FORD AVE_ ¢ L FORD I
W 'p OR '_I VE
a HART- �411 41( aP
ROA
RIVER BLUFFo WELL ST. rSEMINOLE [
LUD LOW AVE. 3 Z ICA.QQ\AGM ..JE
lt
IWINENWM=M11 41
. W V
CONGDON n Q
in A✓E. 2z.._.=. L SHOE
•
Rope
A - JE
S?e-c_ i Pd..- 14-4054P 1T
C
Exhibit A
EXHIBIT B
AREA III
SURVEY RESULTS
TOTAL
STREET YES NO PROPERTIES RENTERS
Bellevue Avenue 0 2 5 0 -
Dundee Avenue 1 3 27 0 -
Elma Street 5 4 12 0 +
Glenwood Avenue 9 4 17 1 +
Glenwood Trail* 2 6 9 0 -
Hartwell Avenue 8 9 20 0 -
Luda Street 12 4 16 3 +
Morton Avenue 0 1 2 0 -
Oakhill Road* 2 5 11 0 -
(West of Sherwood)
Oakhill Road 6 1 8 0 +
(East of Sherwood)
Parkway Avenue 33 23 67 3 +
Preston Avenue 5 3 11 0 +
Sherwood Avenue 6 8 18 2 -
Stewart Avenue 19 19 61 1 o
Trout Park Boulevard 3 3 8 0 o
Victor Avenue 3 0 3 0 +
TOTAL 114 95 295 10
Less Streets West of
Sherwood ( *) -4 -7 -17 -0
SUBTOTAL 110 84 275 10
r
,. -.
•
o'=-T45/4, Memorandum F:7.-
Irsvit
i_Alki...> „
'‘-i,,, *'
August 8, 1994
TO: Richard B. Helwig, City Manager
FROM: Clay J. Pearson, Budget/Public Information Officer
SUBJECT: Area III Input from Mr. Wacker
One clarification is already needed for the preliminary costs
provided to the Council and to the residents . Legal and
interest reserve should have been calculated as 12% of the
entire project cost rather than just the construction costs.
Using the same projections, the total rough order of magni-
tude for the project cost goes up by $65,000 to $3,360,000 .
Private Assessment estimates would need to accordingly be
revised. Please keep in mind that the estimated Private
Assessment is shown using a simple 40% rate. In reality, all
storm water and sanitary sewer work is public benefit and
would not be a part of the private assessment.
Attached you will find Mr. Dennis Wacker's letter to you
dated August 6 . Mr. Wacker is responding to my letter inform-
ing all addresses we have in Area III know about the upcoming
City Council meeting. I also supplied a copy of the same
agenda memorandum to all in the survey area.
As you requested, a few comments on Mr. Wacker's letter fol-
low, using his outline:
1. Cost
All discussions on cost have been prefaced with the
disclaimer that these are very rough "order of magnitude
projections" . No engineering work has yet been accom-
plished from which more accurate cost estimates can be
prepared. The worksheet (Attachment A) used for the
latest financial impact inflates costs by 5% per year.
However, we do have the recent experience with Area II
as a guide. That guide is actual costs to the property
owners and to the City. In the original letter dated
February 1, we said the Area II property assessments
"'" ranged between $3,600 and $4,500 per 50 foot lot front-
age. In the next paragraph, given the uncertainties of
making projections, we said the annual cost for a ten-
Richard B. Helwig
August 8, 1994
Page 2
year period would be approximately $500 to $600 per
year, based on a 50 foot frontage.
The estimate from April to August was amended to add
almost 1,500 linear feet for Sherwood Avenue, increasing
the estimated cost. We've attempted at all times in
this process to make valid assumptions and provide a
reasonable and accurate estimate at all times.
2 . Discrepancies
a. I 've attached copies of all the Luda responses
received to date. My response when the issue came
up that night in April was that we would take anoth-
er look at the tally. Review of those responses
that are attached reverifies the totals recently
reported. Mr. Wacker or anyone is welcome to re-
view the survey cards and compare them to the tally
sheet.
Parkway Avenue - All along, we've used the color-
coded map to track responses (attached, green for
yes and blue for no) . This map provides a good
illustration of the subject area with known address-
es, including vacant lots . Those addressed shown
on Stuart do total 61 . The same applies to Parkway.
A copy of the response from the Church of the Breth-
ren in the affirmative is also attached.
b. No vote is currently recorded for Coleman School .
My records do not list them as being on the origi-
nal mailing list, although they should have re-
ceived the follow-up letter. I will have these
sent right away.
If there are any questions, I am available at your conve-
nience.
Clay . Pe son
Budget/Public Information Officer
amp
Attachments
c: Robert O. Malm
James L. Kristiansen
James R. Nowicki
r
Project Id€ fication No:SA03
Prc., .fit Title: Special Assessment Area 3 Project Location: Northeast area of Elgin east and west of Dundee Ave.
Project Description: Full reconstruction,including water mains,storm sewers,sanitary sewers,roadway,curbs and gutters,
sidewalks,parkway restoration (street trees as necessary) and signage,Currently,the project may consist of about 9,660 feet of
improvements for sections of the following streets: Stewart Ave.,Parkway Ave.,Trout Ave.,Victor Ave.,Trout Park Blvd.,Glenwood Ave.,
Oakdale Rd.,Sherwood Ave.,Elma St.,Luda St.,Hartwell Ave.,and Preston Ave. Engineering and community meetings leading to Court
approval of the project will likely take two years,with construction in one season.
Project Expenditure Estimates
Expenditure by Activity _ Expenditure Estimates by Year
Current Current
Project Activity Estimate Prior Years 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000-2004 2005-2009
Pre-engineerjng 25,000 25,000
Engineering 225,000 235,000
Property Acquisition
Construction 2,230,000 2,455,000
Inspection 275,000 300,000
Contingency 250,00025,000 245,000
Other(legal and Interest resery 270,000 29&24&086' '
Total Estimates: 3,275,000 0 0 285,000 95 66O Thit0 0 0 0 0
Project Funding Schedule 43,36q o-ufl `jl°
Prior-Current Budget Future Funding Requirements
Prior Current
Sources of Funds Budgets Budget 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000-2004 2005-2009
395- GO Bonds 1995 175,000
a
396- GO Bonds 1996 175861900• I,1,21,0"
420-Water Development-1996 395,000
•', 34 ow
Private Assessment 110,000 4-7820-,000—
Total Funds 0 01 285,000 0 0 0 0 0
Current Project Status 30,06-0
Status and Misc.Comments: Project estimates have been based soley upon actual construction costs incurred for the Area 2 project.
Actual cost estimates,which may vary considerably from the estimate,will be developed as part of Pre-engineering. Cost are assumed to
be distributed on a 40% private assessment and 60% public benefit. This ratio may change as more accurate cost estimates are developed.
Private assemment amounts to about$64.00 per foot.
COST ESTIMATE NOTE: Current Estimate is in 1994 Dollars; each annual Estimate has been Inflated by 5%per year.
Kaci
E AL,—: ; :
T= , F-. :_`:a n d He - :c
rom: De 1n_C. We- ker
(114
747 Parkway Ave.
Elgin, IL. S.2;:,
RE : Area III spec i ,-'.nt i'_ . r i ade _ =t'_ r m EEWC- e
Dear Mr . He: ,,, _c .
In response to cur _cnyereatic_n =-. SatL - -" r' Aug. a. 1 =I-=. I - _ - _
you, as you r et,Jes t of - '- - - t t i n= t~f- - "' - _ = i r _ "'71.a t y - - -t- p _r _ ,
There are a r _mt.=, =,f ,- _ : 't = t a . nee.- _ _ - - i - - - -= _- r . .- = = - = = _
t_o the e:p e w'._ -r. thisp'r' C,_,C_ '_ ..i :. : r ✓e &r, e_ i E' _ t -
i _ _ _ L'si- _ -CE Err _ - _ - _ded t - - _ 1 -. "` .. _-tc _ _
= - -E^.!= da`E A Iu • 'D4, _ -!71-. 1E earliere: s = - - E•- - r-r- ' - a. . - -
- . . 4•'C=L . _ _ .E: -= t -.7 ,I: _. _ _. -E ,. __ '71E -_- _ - ETC _ - _ t - - .-, c.. _ _ .
Residents_ Portion of bill
Feb 1 April 21 Aug
$3600—$4500 per 50 ft $ 900, 000 g' 1 , 4Z0, 000
($3050.80 per address) ($4847. 45 per address.)
Project increased $ 530, 000 in UNDER 4 months ' !
T- es_ - - -_- are de • _ _ - _ tL. _ . . ett_ _- _G- - - _ .. - -_
bE t='t , __ T:E -' _'45' _ per 5_ r. . i1 fr - td' a. --- _ F - .1 - _ .
t -:p 1 e t.E: _ g- - % =-- . E''-%_ ,i:._ .,� t -c. . -- - - - - _ - ' ' - -:-17.7:: - - _ . --
s,_Vve . r H._ _ 1 2_ leets " a _-: _. 77 ', - +. tme _ 1 -- _ .. _ _ - - - . ` „ •_
furthPY f the area we,---..t = hey' W'= = -' WC—'f= = C 1 Lu d, -- 4- _-. - ' : E7,
- t -~ - -
�;T��: ^f -,; `,.- _ t�',rt war: it � - ,/E IC, tE "arr:_'rE-
- . the Apr i_ _ it_ _ J'_ - = _ 1 meet i, _ , t!—,a Nlal _ fir,.„.- ,-1.,,---77- 1,1; - •- - t. Cc_
fiaures were be.=ed or t.f:e A- -_ . ' -onst . - _ - or: _ - = _1. . _ -- _ =7. E-7,=,.
th
- -
that Area . a,' _ me ii "i_c-• p_,,._ _ t .cf _ _ t e _ _ _ _�
_ + - ,
III w_Lid prab_b' be = _ - - =-- _ - _ t .. = _ _: _M _
sue'=tar.ti _ _ INCREASE ! =_: 1e t =_ . h= -' e_c =-.==.' _ _ _
-'vey have been, mf-a- '` - -TSE:= - = t” = PE^ - . : t = -r t = - E w•
!. survey -
ins_ ..fey_ ! _._ . _. _ ._ ,west _.f S - r w _,.c_ Ay t p._ . _ ar F .,'=_ _ - - _
bL.,"der DT + _ ==t _ the -'c''-Ir ::-;,_-, 7 - LSI= t - - - '74%_ !:11c--= -
ysur office, t L e t _'t = l . +?(t:.=' of pe_n::1 E= r e'_. _ .=a b_ F _.r the i 1H3-: - - -
p rtion of the bill i=.. . . . .:78. 1 , 43,D, 0i;0 divide_ u_ 276 = $F1 1 . c ==
resident with 50 ft . of fr ortage . A_ sc-, keep in mint there are a n_.7' _.
of properties t _Jth Parway and Stewart A . that have double ;=r
adjoining loots . Their tills will bE dcuFtlec t4 .:t c='f everyone e1 =.E . 7s
this fair , considering these doLsble 1 _t5 will not need new apple_._
and do not _otr" i lute anytF ir_c to the sewer E.ys e!m: '
Discrepenc ies: There have been a number of d crepes _ ie= throuch.oL '.
i=_ issue that perhaps you are not aware of and should be clearer . ;_ .
ei 3
tvacif
�E : _ - a''i FGA ~ c (''ac-;t= F _ '_! r t _ i mrl Etc.F.E= a. • the Ham' . - - _
St . at - yeE - 1 h' wh=- E :tuall the _.s i. tE .-'E -e
would have gone un-;-c:tica` ^_. _e t _ or,th - 2 r ._= 1 E' '�- _ i • _
filikyted "n: ' showed ...r_ at the f!!e - !C: t•= c ictG_t .
Mr . F'earsor=_ ree _- _= t _ th.la w ._ . . . =!!_!pe; ; e-__ I made a mi=_ : .. - -
can only wonder how man_.' more floods" cc'u:: c be is._. if there were -
little digging done. He also made t`,e statement that right of the =�
meeting that me -E res,lts came in t!=!d''-_ _?' Parkway -
' yes' so that terra Parkway ( :', D r,_ - _7 into a positive nuc'
people in supra'= U. . " E,-use bit - = was _. -
the time a tie, mot a IN =
=
there is no q u e s.i' _ =!n a= to whoa side �_ 1 - Fear _ - .- w'_ - - f like 1:2. SEE-
win .
--
win . And .,E _' fc!uid be in
Stewart Av. . .
+ _lc._ p _spa' + .F_ _ _ ._ _y ..` _ - _ _ _ _ -+ 7-,
or l e vote ' r!= • while _ . my own .d_ _ t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ t r. t _ !._._ _
r ' ` • - , - _ 7 t-'a.:c + .E- - .-+ - - ._ - -
Parkway Av: " _ _ _ - <. _ a-e - _
y G7 'e _F_ G� - _ epe - , - - E`"_ - [' r. _�' L _ , .
•
the her - iflOE .
-•� c - - -
, t rr ! y' - - _ - _ ' - _ . 7 _ - _.�- _ - - -
_ _ E.-:E_ _ _
FhPrw,:c'd al .d r-'al.' - . F;. T,:- y =,1- t=r _ _ _ -
L t } ; _ _ L. _ =L 1 h.=
a: 1 =
i _ t - _ f _ _ _ l
~!r _n t~ _ - up b_:ause _ _ _,nted the num:a' of h._ _l'__ -
effected on -'e. 'w'o !d " .d _ !_+r _ v count 13, y;_, _ t - _ _ _
dated IB tr .a,'. p,r dpertiea . Dim _ - le,aa
to cast 5 .`,rtes c thl:: Ll_ ♦ E:Y , ;_;* L _ '-'tf-_ . . 1I-
Mr . Pearson? AND. . . I tLe "school " d) :-' i ray=' E t! - _ _:
votes, shouldn' t all the othe i='' o-e _ t` ::t have
and will : _ L = _ _ _ - _ _ h_ - _ 'r' - ` -t -a c' TtE
cn let ' s be fair here .
r
.i u cl_ f•�.,YiiCt �•_!C_, w .. _ _�� - ' _ � _ _ .. t'iTtc � r! r - .. _
_i_: b_ - _
_
bill ? E.,ytc•.-� _ y rot the _ __�-I._ _!1 u � = � .. =t t`!E _ . =._ .' t�Gy ^.E'' - - _
bankrupt . The ta'•.payer- = • u tl:E a-: le '; ,2,re- ' _ 7 , ._ .-
Coleman school , they sbc _.- L be t !-'e !=;: le'= t != c. .'t t tL -_
It would truly be in the best interest ,_ ' = =n=e' :,gid that Dan _
due to what could be "bias" fa'va it __m, and Ed c _ , F'rincipa:
Coleman school who woL1 !d ' Ia.ve __r _-_ nal interests in this, Ab=_tain
from even votir;g on this t =pic .
Renters: Renters from this survey should not eve-, be counted. They =. -e
t the ones who will pay for the 11?r.rcrveme^t5, the actual prope'rt .
wners will . Yes you can say the renter will eve-: tua.11y pay f„r it i -
higher rent , but who will that renter- be. If } ' c 'r ant• the pE'=!ple now,
pay goes up to much, t:s 80 - $ 100 per month :> they will .just move cn.
The "renter " who says ' yes' t-rday, may n:!'. i ] ve here 2 m'-:-Ith^ frr,n
( fou : the propew .).- s E e
E. Elgih - .
is ownee 1.p., the- - E" - e -
roc:. comment .
7.7 the letter dsktsa - = tat.-.=,= in an
contact aE Mafl'i nm--, esontel,t peop: e as pos = : : e used
property recorP.s. But the,: „ . "ti-e poTerties were no,,
pursued. Over ol7 the ho_ 'ses on Parkway anc StP-wart lie Its:
County. If you REALLY W.L7tE,C t : -each LL 1 " tris. pJperty i:wne:
one should he...sie taJen the- time aht omn, fc the
and get that information. On t -ere ---- -
houses that lie in an.c. tr
Summary: This Surve is t .=t— ' 7.. ; -._ a 7_ 11 ' , -
the MF-yor : n fhe April meetno, "WE want tc Pe
dor • t to s!-- .1 - e anc , _ . :• -t
mapnatuide anf clea7y it,EVE E '7 = .7
s..,prt of th pecple,- H. ‘-r:H,.
be- s- Y-7
F L: Lti _7* 17: - _ r c - p!. - _
out E s . r- e \ . mo + -e-.
c_ost Er _ pt
t- y :s t
pe_p : s "JE',E,- vE
if - e
•
he- -; s: s
t.a*. e: y mas - -
_
sh :! : _ " : + 7
t“ -' - ' M
do w'--,eh t-E, i . e arc: .
to - - _
4e .5E Fee,c. oeee To "gee Cop/ey
frup FopkiA D TO 7-we inAytook4 covA/cti
hestkpvi FD,q He.9,e FR on you /./7 A)
ok Tv el.
haA,e ,4, 7-/me (S 11: 50 -12:20
6'75- 423 y
De•vAe/ wilelePR
Tear on pert and rnaL Tear on pert and mall.
1 I'm FOR the street I t/I'm FOR the str R ect includ-
ing
Ing the Special Ass the Speci rit or a portion of the'
cost. cost.
MAY 9951 ,`;i,.,
I'm NOT In favor of the pr: :.std IMPovement I'm NOT in favor of the prtSpdc� Improvement
project and Special Assessment. project and Spy l9V ssment.
CITY OF ELGIN F'UCHASINc '�v
UCHAs��EPT. ���
0 Owner Renter 0 Owner "' "`Rhnter
Homeowner A < J' " Homeowner O_L 't_ac.CJ �� 4......0
(Lc( Lt&ctq.
Address Address 1 (e -1 “-cde----
Phone Number ��' U 3D Co Phone Number 0.2 :- -- '3 69
Above Information Required Above Information Required
y (g
-U._N- _ ��_--- - - -
Tear on pert and mall. Tear on pert and mall.
I'm FOR the street Improvement project includ- A I'm FOR the street Im ptoJect`nciud-
Ing the Special Assessment for a portion of the ing the Special AssesLtitiifit for a portion of the
cost. cost. k'''
`- `
MAY 25 1994
XI'm NOT In favor of the proposed Improvement I'm NOT in favor of the proposed improvement
project and Special Assessment. project and Special Asst r f�F LL1 N
PUCHASING DEPT.
N-
S.
21 Owner ❑ Renter [ Owner ❑ Renter
h Le 11 r
Homeowner Op�l a.5 ft b e e r Homeowner ti�
c; cS ca. ,c GL,rN_ Le ck b e. l 1 `e-t�
.�,�,
� LPL. s !lu CA-a- 7 0 b
Address � Address 6
Phone Number ' l/ - 3 S S-k Phone Number , /f- ( - 6 F c�
Above Information Required 1D ?)/71>/q
4 / Above Information Required
I\ 1`u ,l i
Tear on pert and rr►aA. Tear on pert and mall. -1164101Pleq
I'm FOR the street Improvement project includ- Pm FOR the street Improvement project Includ-
ing the Special Assessment for a portion of the Ing the Special Assessment for a portion of the
cost. cost.
I'm NOT In favor of the proposed Improvement I'm NOT In favor of the proposed Improvement
project�nd SpecI41 Ass ertt. project and Special Assessment.
Owner CI Renter ?, '3 ❑ Owner ❑ Renter
k o Al.
it,
Homeowner Y14we; e 1 j: C Y;ste h 5 e v, Homeowner 66 b /(/e/-- ` C7
Address 6 7* L u`^et a- s 7' Address £ 7 7 / . Q
f ti 4
(,
Phone Number 74Q—0 '7 g I Phone Number(7c21 ) 7Ve7 66 3
Above Information Required Above Information Required ./1N /
,----Tear on perf and mall. Tear on perf and mall.
3(I/`t`l
I'm FOR the street improvement project inciud- VOID I'm FOR the street Improvement project Includ-
ing the Special Assessment for a portion of the ing the Special Assessment for a portion of the
cost. cost.
Y\
I'm NOT In favor of the proposed Improvement )( I'm NOT in favor of the proposed improvement
project and Special Assessment. r �`� project and Special Assessment.
- 'Owner O Renter Xi Owner ❑ Renter
Homeowne
.7n 4. a•-4% 22- Homeowner - --- - ----- e
cl — 676 Luria Street
Address �_ t,c-K Address— Elgin, IL 60120
Phone Number `-1/ — A grs" 1 Phone Number 14107 477814,
Above Information Required I Above Information Required
�, A,
lets0llpenICRIUIIIUII.
Tea on pert and maN.
� I'm FOR the str ��ott5 c'� clud-
Xr Special �nt bora ortlon.of the.
I m FOR the street Improvement project Includ- Ing the p P
Ing the Special Assessment for a portion of the cost. �' MAY 25 1994
cost.
I'm NOT In favor of the proposed Improvement
I'm NOT In favor of the proposed Improvement
project and Spe�lt1PsesEment.
project and Special Assessment. ,,1-~` � rucF�A�iN� ��� I.
V;itt'
(� Owner CIRenter
XOwner ❑ Renter R
Ko
D Homeowner 4.ww�,2_
Homeowner RYANIJ Jl.)k'Sit'i v
(o&w DP (ago 4 ia,,q) Address 6 g X V 4017 S
Address (9 1/I J`1 dn-
P L 6/tO ,-ti--- 6(2/40 Phone Number 7Q $ 74 'ir 3 7
Phone Number A7Ca - 6 96-- S y d Q. Above information Required
Above information Required \l Y
--- — - - - T i -- --__ T.
Tea on pert and maN. Tear on pert and mall.
7 I'm FOR the s vx-iit,,v-,T?,,z.,r5-;11);O4 Includ- I/ I'm FOR the stre rl� rb)ect includ-
ing the Spec ,4ssessment for a portion of the Ingthe Special mit fd portion of the
cost.
MAY 5cst. P
2 1994 U 51994 L.
I'm NOT in fav proposed Improvement MAY 2
� � P P I'm NOT in favor of the proposed Improvement
project and Spe 11 s ssment`: project and Speclgsses�mentLG I N
t a�{Tti
(' U Owner Renter isi Owner , ❑ Renter
Homeowner J 0e. Xj111104 4\ Homeowner / /�/�iLV c R(0•
UJ
r. Address (0713 LU r A s4 Address b C(1`'1 v47)4
Phone Number i — '74 2 ^ (e U 3 7 Phone Number 6 L/ 077- G- 6
Above Information Required Above Information Required
Tear on pert and mat
�
• I m FOR the street Improvement project Includ-
Ing the Special Assessment for a portion of the
cost.
I'm NOT In favor of the proposed Improvement
project and Special Assessment.
Owner Renter • f144
tai,(/ rec'4
Homeowner (2
Address 0Q/ ' 41
Phone Number
Above Information Required
Tear on pert and mal.
I'm FOR the strer�ei�1 project Includ-
Ing the Specla
ent for a portion of the
cost. -
MAY 25 1994
I'm NOT In favor of the proposed Improvement
project and Speclgl*VgEs M C_.�
PUCHASING u�EPT.
AZI Owner ' O Renter
1
Homeowner-,arn.e,s U) - �... e C n Q r,
AlteaG.4‘ 1►_ . (11ZAArnAte•-A*1
\
Addre• • II - i
Phone Number r1 OK r O 3 k
Above Information Required
Tear on pert and mail.
I'm FOR the street improvement project includ-
ing the Special Assessment for a portion of the
cost.
I'm NOT in favor of the proposed Improvement
project and Special Assessment.
a Owner ❑ Renter
Homeowner C//a/re-/9 9/7/1A: ',qA//-* '/2" G fi /3o 9/09.
Address 7V t w''X7 4/L
7�i'� -J%OO CO4 E / CLD ) hoick o
Phone Number J
Above information Required
Tear on perf and mall.
I'm FOR the street improvement project includ-
ing the Special Assessment for a portion of the
cost.
I'm NOT in favor of the proposed improvement
project and Special Assessment.
Owner ❑ Renter
Homeowner C//vKch/ Ti/c- ,5it'i1=T/Fit°,e~
/yS/ /Mt. .
Address FiK Io7s (g) oi,/ S'T�1✓y.t-,47Ade,
/0T,w,wsqs 'p3 9 - yo - / - y),
Phone Number 7V.2 - ,S/20
Above Information Required