Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutG43-12 J Ordinance No. G43-12 • AN ORDINANCE GRANTING DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL PURSUANT TO A PAB PLANNED AREA BUSINESS DISTRICT (Portillo's Restaurant Building on Lots 3 and 4 and Site Improvements Associated with Future Retail Building on Lot 10 in Elgin Wal-Mart/Sam's Club Subdivision) (1010, 1020 and 1030 Randall Road) WHEREAS, the territory herein described has been annexed to the City of Elgin and classified in the PAB Planned Area Business District (Ordinance No. G32-10); and WHEREAS, written application has been made to permit the construction of a Portillo's Restaurant Building and the Site Improvements Associated with a Future Retail Building in the PAB Planned Area Business District and in the ARC Arterial Road Corridor Overlay District; and WHEREAS, the development of certain property in the Elgin Wal-Mart/Sam's Club Subdivision was approved with the passage of Ordinance No. G32-10; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. G32-10 requires that prior to any other or further development in the Elgin Wal-Mart/Sam's Club Subdivision, the owner of the Subject Property • to be developed shall be required to submit a development plan to the city for a public hearing and City Council approval pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 19.60, Planned Developments, of the Elgin Municipal Code, 1976, as amended; and WHEREAS, after due notice in the manner provided by law the Planning and Development Commission conducted public hearings concerning said application and has submitted its written findings and recommendations; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin, Illinois, has reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Elgin hereby adopts the Findings of Fact, dated July 2, 2012, made by the Planning and Zoning Commission, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A. Section 2. That a development plan in the PAB Planned Area Business District, which will permit the construction of a Portillo's Restaurant Building on Lots 3 and 4 and only the Site Improvements Associated with Future Retail Building on Lot 10 of the Elgin Wal-Mart/Sam's Club Subdivision, those lots legally described as follows: • LOTS 35 4 AND 10 OF THE ELGIN WAL-MART/SAM'S CLUB SUBDIVISION • BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 8 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, KANE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED ON DECEMBER 6, 2011 AS DOCUMENT NO. 2011 K073 547. Be and is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: 1. As it relates to Lot 10 of the Elgin Wal-Mart/Sam's Club Subdivision, this grant of development plan approval is for site improvements only. The city shall not issue a building permit for the retail building until such time that the city council approves elevations of the retail building in the same manner in which this development plan approval was granted. 2. Upon Lot 4, the applicant shall replace the three deciduous trees proposed within the 50-foot building setback parallel to Bowes Road and located just east of the western lot line with three pine trees. 3. Substantial conformance to the three (3) pages titled, "'Statement of Purpose, Departures and Conformance," date stamped June 15, 2012. In the event of any conflict between such statement document and the other specific provisions of this ordinance, the other specific provisions of this ordinance shall supersede and • control. 4. Substantial conformance to the following drawings pertaining to the site improvements associated with the Portillo's Restaurant Building, including revisions per the Community Development Department, Engineering Division, Fire Department, and Water Department, if any: a. Portillo's Restaurant Final Engineering Site Layout Plan, Sheet C-01, prepared by ATWELL, dated June 14, 2012; and b. Portillo's Restaurant Final Engineering Site Landscape Plan, Sheet C-04, prepared by ATWELL, dated June 14, 2012. 5. Substantial conformance with the following drawings pertaining to the architecture and construction of the Portillo's Restaurant Building, prepared by Jensen & Jensen, including revisions by the Community Development Department, Engineering Division, Fire Department, and Water Department, if any: a. Restaurant Rendering ("Proposed Restaurant for Portillo's Hot Dogs"), dated June 25, 2012; b. Exterior Building Elevations, Sheets A-4.0 and A-4.1, both dated June 15, 2012; c. Floor Plan & Notes, Sheet A-1.0, dated June 15, 2012; and d. Trash Enclosure Plan, Elevations, and Sections, Sheet A-9.0, dated June 15, 2012. 6. Substantial conformance to the following drawings pertaining to only the site • improvements associated with a Future Retail Building, including revisions per i the Community Development Department, Engineering Division, Fire • Department, and Water Department, if any: a. Retail Final Engineering Site Layout Plan, Sheet C-01, prepared by ATWELL, dated June 14, 2012 and revised June 29, 2012; and b. Retail Final Engineering Site Landscape Plan, Sheet C-04, prepared by ATWELL, dated June 14, 2012 and revised June 29, 2012. 7. Substantial conformance with the drawing labeled Site Lighting Photometrics, prepared by Jensen & Jensen, dated June 15, 2012 and the associated eight (8) pages of fixture cut sheets, prepared by Lsi Industries, dated December 6, 2011. 8. Substantial conformance with the ten (10) pages of drawings pertaining to the signage for the Portillo's Restaurant Building and the Future Retail Building, prepared by Olympic Signs, dated February 16, 2012, revised June 14, 2012 (except Sheet 8 which was revised June 26, 2012), including revisions by the Community Development Department, Engineering Division, Fire Department, and Water Department, if any. 9. Compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances. Section 3. That except as amended herein, the use and development of the Subject Property shall be controlled pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. G32-10. In the event of any conflict between this ordinance, which expressly includes those documents detailed within • Section 2 and the allowances and departures described and provided thereon, and the provisions of Ordinance No. G32-10, this ordinance and associated documents shall control and prevail. Section 4. That this ordinance shall be full force and effect immediately after its passage in the manner provided by law. ` David J. V—apj5K, kgor Presented: July 25, 2012 Passed: July 25, 2012 Omnibus Vote: Yeas: 7 Nays: 0 Recorded: July 25, 2012 FW Published: July 27, 2012 "u V imberly Dewis, ity Clerk • July 11, 2012 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION AND FINDINGS OF FACT Community Development Department City of Elgin, IL OVERVIEW Portillo's Hot Dogs Inc. requests Development Plan Approval to construct a Portillo's restaurant with drive-through facility at the southwest corner of Bowes and Randall Roads, within the Wal-Mart and Sam's Club shopping center. The applicant also proposes to install the site improvements for a future retail building along Bowes Road, between the new restaurant and the Sam's Club. The elevations for that retail building must come back for review by the Planning & Zoning Commission and approval by City Council. GENERAL INFORMATION Petition No.: 28-12 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE, subject to conditions outlined at the conclusion of this report (see Recommendation Detail) Applicant: Portillo's Hot Do sg Inc. Staff Coordinator: Marc S. Mylott. AICP. Director of Community Development History: After due notice as required by law, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and considered Petition 28-12 on July 2. 2012. The applicant submitted a Statement of Purpose, Departures, and Conformance dated received June 15. 2012 and testified at the public hearing. List of Exhibits: A. Aerial/Location Map B. Zoning Map C. Parcel Map D. Site Photos E. Development Application and Plans F. Transcript BACKGROUND & PROJECT DETAIL The Elgin Wal-Mart and Sam's Club shopping center was annexed and zoned in 2006. That approval included the establishment of a Wal-Mart store (opened October 2011), a Sam's Club store (scheduled to open August/September 2012), and other retail and commercial establishments on seven additional Exhibit A • outlots. That approval also required that any development upon the outlots have a public hearing before the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council approval. The subject properties are Lots 3, 4, and 10 of the recorded subdivision. Lot 4 (1020 South Randall Road) is at the southwest corner of Bowes and Randall Roads Lot 3 1030 South Randall Road is immediately south of the Lot 4 and abuts the Sam's Club Gas Station currently under construction on Lot 9, and Lot 10 (10 10 South Randall Road) is located along Bowes Road, between the Sam's Club and the corner lot. Portillo's proposes to construct an approximately 8,400 square foot restaurant on Lot 4, including a drive-through facility and surface parking area. Lot 3 would be additional parking with a stub at the southeast corner to eventually connect to the future car wash of the Sam's Club Gas Station. In the near future, Portillo's intends to file an application for a plat of resubdivision to consolidate both Lots 3 and 4 into one. Portillo's proposes a combination of unique architecture and placement of the building to address this prime commercial corner. By angling the building, three elevations would be prominently displayed along Bowes and Randall Roads. The northeast elevation, facing the corner, would be extremely active, featuring changes in building massing and color, a long run of dining-room windows, and a prominent vertical architectural element with signage. Continuing south, the building fagade would curve toward the entrance, and it too would be articulated by a prominent vertical architectural element with signage. The building would be constructed primarily of precast masonry panels, some textured and permanently colored to resemble brick, others smooth faced resembling stone. The precast panels would include true • reveals and be delineated with coping and courses. The base would be a painted split-face block. In front of the entrance, the applicant proposes to provide a large paved outdoor dining plaza with tables, chairs, umbrellas, and landscaping within planters. The plaza would be protected from the adjacent driveways (east and west sides) by a masonry knee wall and fence. The southern end of the plaza would be open to allow easy access, except brick piers, acting as bollards, would be strategically placed at the head of the adjacent handicap parking spaces. The applicant proposes a drive-through that would include ample on-site stacking space. The applicant has employed extensive measures to minimize the potential conflicts between drivers, pedestrians, and bicycle riders (a bike rack is provided at the southeast corner of the plaza and two are proposed at the future retail building). For example, both the restaurant and future retail site would include a five- to six-foot wide sidewalk running east/west, allowing pedestrians to move from the Sam's Club and future retail stores to the restaurant and back. Where this pedestrian path crosses driveways, the applicant proposes to create wide striped intersections, approximately 35-45 feet wide. Sidewalks would be added along both sides of the future retail building to bring pedestrians off the existing sidewalk south into the site and the east/west sidewalk. Also, the applicant would install landscaping clusters and possibly a low berm to discourage persons who are using the existing sidewalks along Bowes and Randall Roads from leaving those paths at inappropriate locations. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DEPARTURES AND EXCEPTIONS • The applicant requests several logical departures from the PAB Ordinance and/or the Zoning Ordinance. First, the PAB Ordinance requires that trash enclosures within this shopping center be attached to the I Page 2 of 9 • building. On the restaurant site, because the drive-through lanes must wrap the building, and because of the way the building is placed at the corner, the applicant requests a detached trash enclosure. Also, the Zoning Ordinance requires that trash enclosures be located within the rear yard. However, the site has no true rear yard. The trash enclosure is proposed near the elevation which includes the service door and outside of the 50-foot building setback. The trash enclosure would be constructed of materials matching the building and be landscaped. On the future retail site, two trash enclosures would be attached to the east and west sides of the building. These side locations are preferred to the rear of the building which would be the south elevation—that elevation along the parking lot and essentially a front of the building. Second, the applicant proposes to reduce, and in some cases eliminate, the 6-foot setback for vehicle use areas along the two internal driveways that access the shopping center from Bowes Road. In these locations, Portillo's still proposes to provide all the required landscaping; only that landscaping would be located within the landscape islands that are located within the common area. These islands well exceed 6 feet. In some instances, Portillo's would provide sidewalks. Because this development would be part of a unified shopping center, setbacks along these lot lines offer little value and would be discernible only to a person who was actually looking at a site plan. Again, the shopping center would include all required landscape areas and sidewalks. Finally, because the applicant proposes to construct a restaurant that is highly visible from four sides (being on a corner outlot within a shopping center), and because that visibility comes in part from two arterials streets, the applicant requires several departures from the street graphics provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. First, the applicant proposes to paint, then distress, six nostalgic graphics on the • sides of the building, having them appear as if they were once used for roadside advertisements. However, the Zoning Ordinance does not permit any form of painted wall graphics. A proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance would allow the applicant to not count such nostalgic graphics against the allowable number and size of wall graphics when city council approves a planned development or development plan. This text amendment would also allow authorized painted wall graphics to be lower than nine feet above the adjacent driveways. Next, the applicant proposes to install seven wall graphics whereas the Zoning Ordinance would limit that number to three.(two wall graphics plus one along the rear elevation per ground floor occupant). However, roof graphics count as wall graphics, of which the applicant proposes two. Such special graphics and their associated architectural features would highlight the entrance to the building and accentuate its intentional orientation to the corner. The Zoning Ordinance also generally considers that a building would have no more than two street frontages whereas this building would have three. Lastly, the restaurant would be located upon two outlots that, if developed with two buildings rather than one, could have many more wall graphics. A proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance would allow city council to permit two additional wall graphics where a building has more than two street frontages and when approved as a planned development or development plan approval. Similarly, that text amendment would not count roof graphics with architectural features toward the allowable number and area of wall graphics when approved as a planned development or development plan approval. Finally, that text amendment gives city council the ability to approve the associated additional surface area. Third, the Zoning Ordinance does not permit graphics to extend above the main line of the roof. Again, • the applicant proposes two special graphics and their associated architectural features to highlight the entrance to the building and accentuate its intentional orientation to the corner. A proposed text Page 3 of 9 • amendment to the Zoning Ordinance would allow city council to permit such graphics when designed in conjunction with an architectural detail and when approved as a planned development or development plan approval. Fourth, the Zoning Ordinance does not permit lighting to outline building features. A proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance would allow city council to permit such outlines along sign bands when approved as a planned development or development plan approval. Fifth, Portillo's proposes to place their directional graphics upon masonry bases, matching their building and other freestanding graphics. However, the Zoning Ordinance counts the area of the base against the small amount of surface area allowed. A proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance would require directional graphics to have a masonry base, cap the height of such graphics at three feet (preventing them from being a sight obstruction), and not count the area of the base against the allowable amount of surface area or require landscaping otherwise required for monument graphics. Sixth, the applicant proposes to provide one, 60 square-foot menu board for two drive-through lanes. However, the Zoning Ordinance limits such graphics to 50 square feet. A proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance would allow the additional 20 percent of menu board where it would be viewed by more than one drive-through lane. Finally, while not a departure, Portillo's seeks to take advantage of the proposed text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which would allow electronic message boards within monument graphics along Randall Road. The proposed monument graphic would conform to all requirements associated with • such graphics. FINDINGS OF FACT The Planning & Zoning Commission finds that: A. Site Characteristics Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned development with respect to its size, shape, significant natural features (including topography, watercourse and vegetation), and existing improvements. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect to the site characteristics standard. The lots proposed for the restaurant would contain approximately 3.18 acres of land. The property is relatively flat with no significant natural features. The property is currently vacant. B. Sewer and Water Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned development with respect to the availability of adequate municipal water, wastewater treatment, and storm water control facilities. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect to the sewer and water standard. • Page 4 of 9 • The subject properties are served with municipal sanitary sewer and water systems. Stormwater control facilities have been designed to serve the larger subdivision in accordance with the City of Elgin and Kane County Stormwater Management Ordinances. C. Traffic and Parking Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned develo p ment with res p ect to the provision of safe and efficient on-site and o ff-site vehicular circulation designed to minimize traffic congestion. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect to the traffic and parking standard. The lots have frontage along, but no direct access to Bowes or Randall Roads. The property will have indirect access to Bowes and Randall Roads via cross-access easements through the larger commercial subdivision. The locations of the access points to Bowes and Randall Roads, and the required improvements to those roads, have been installed in accordance with an intergovernmental agreement between the City of Elgin and Kane County. The proposed parking areas for the restaurant and future retail building would have more parking spaces than required by the Zoning Ordinance. The configuration of the drive-through facility provides sufficient on-site stacking space such that queued vehicles will not obstruct traffic along adjacent streets or upon adjacent lots. • The proposed site plan includes ample provisions for persons to get to either the restaurant and/or the future retail building by foot or by bicycle. Such provisions should help minimize the amount of vehicular traffic in/around the site. More so, the plan provides extraordinary site features designed expressly to minimize the potential conflict between vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists, including but not limited to a wide east/west sidewalk, oversized striped intersections, and strategically placed landscaping. D. Zoning History Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned development with respect to the length of time the property has remained undeveloped or unused in its current zoning district. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect to the length of time the property has remained undeveloped or unused in its current zoning district. The subdivision in which the subject properties are located was annexed and zoned PAB Planned Area Business District in 2006 under Ordinance No. G114-06. In 2010, the planned development ordinance was amended to modify the site plan, landscape plan, and building elevations of the Walmart and Sam's Club buildings to match branding, store layout, and material requirements of the respective companies, and to amend the allowable land uses for the seven outlots within the subdivision. These amendments were articulated in Ordinance No. G32-10, and the proposed development would be consistent with the commercial planned development requirements for the shopping center contained within this ordinance. • Page 5 of 9 • E. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned development with respect to consistency and compatibility with surrounding land use and zoning. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect to consistency and compatibility with surrounding land use and zoning. The lots immediately to the south and west of the subject properties are within the Walmart and Sam's Club shopping center, also zoned PAB Planned Area Business District. Lot 8, located at the southwest corner of the subdivision, is developed with stormwater management facilities and allows for the protection of the unnamed stream which is tributary to Otter Creek. The area located to the south of the shopping center is in unincorporated Kane County. The area is in agricultural use and is designated for commercial development when annexed to the City of Elgin. The area located to the west of the shopping center is zoned PMFR Planned Multiple Family Residence District and PCF Planned Community Facility District. The PMFR District is developed with townhomes in The Reserve Subdivision. The PCF District contains floodplain and wetland areas associated with the Otter Creek watershed and stormwater management facilities serving The Reserve Subdivision. The areas located to the east of the subject properties and the shopping center, across Randall • Road, are zoned PMFR Planned Multiple Family Residence District and PAB Planned Area Business District. The PMFR District is improved with townhomes in the Willowbay Subdivision. The PAB District is developed with a bank, a child day care center, and a commercial/office subdivision known as Bowes Commons. I The area located to the north of the subject properties and the shopping center, across Bowes Road, is zoned SFR2 Single Family Residence District and PAB Planned Area Business District. The SFR2 District is improved with single-family homes which are part of the Columbine Subdivision. The PAB District is improved with a restaurant. F. Trend of Development Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned development with respect to consistency with an existing pattern of development or an identifiable trend of development in the area. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect to consistency with an existing pattern of development or an identifiable trend within the area. The subject properties are located in the Randall Road corridor, in an area developing with commercial uses. G. Planned Development Districts Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned development with respect to conformance to the provisions for the purpose and intent, and the location and size of a zoning district. • Page 6 of 9 • The applicant is requesting approval of a planned development in an existing PAB Planned Area Business District. The purpose and intent of the provision of planned developments is to accommodate unique development situations. For planned development districts, the planned development should demonstrate the following characteristics: 1. An opportunity to realize a development of demonstrated need with respect to the types of environment available to the public that would not be possible under the strict application of the other chapters of this title [Zoning Ordinance]; 2. A creative approach to the use of land and related improvements resulting in better design and construction of aesthetic amenities; and 3. The preservation of significant natural features including topography, watercourses, wetlands, and vegetation. The proposed restaurant and future retail building are part of a larger planned commercial subdivision. Planned development review and approval of the proposed project is required pursuant to PAB Planned Area Business District Ordinance No. G32-10. The design of the restaurant conforms with the architectural standards of the PAB District and the Zoning Ordinance. H. Comprehensive Plan Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned development with respect to conformance to the goals, objectives, and policies of the official comprehensive plan. • Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect to the Comprehensive Plan Standard. The subject property is designated as "Highway Commercial" in the City's adopted comprehensive plan. This designation includes commercial areas serving the surrounding neighborhood areas and larger trade areas connected via the arterial road network. I. Natural Preservation Standard. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned development with respect to the preservation of all significant natural features including topography, watercourses, wetlands, and vegetation. Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect to the Natural Preservation Standard. The subject properties contain no natural features. However, the applicant proposes to install more landscaping than that amount required. J. Internal Land Use. The suitability of the subject property for the intended planned development with respect to the land uses permitted within the development being located, designed, and operated so as to exercise no undue detrimental influence on each other or on surrounding property. • Findings. The subject property is suitable for the intended planned development with respect to the internal land use standard. Page 7 of 9 iNo evidence has been submitted or found that the proposed restaurant and future retail building would be located, designed, or operated in a manner that will exercise undue detrimental influence on itself or surrounding property. In fact, quite the contrary; the applicant has proposed a site configuration that will ensure ample on-site stacking space for the drive-through facility and would provide many site features to minimize conflicts between pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicles. RECOMMENDATION DETAIL By a vote of five (5) yes, zero (0) no, and one (1) abstention/recusal, the Planning & Zoning Commission recommends the approval of Petition 28-12, including those requested departures, subject to the following conditions: 1. As it relates to Lot 10 of the Elgin Wal-Mart/Sam's Club Subdivision, this grant of development plan approval is for site improvements only. The city shall not issue a building permit for the retail building until such time that the city council approves elevations of the retail building in the same manner in which this development plan approval was granted. 2. Substantial conformance to the three (3) pages titled, "Statement of Purpose, Departures \ and Conformance," date stamped June 15, 2012. • 3. Substantial conformance to the following drawings pertaining to the site improvements associated with the Portillo's Restaurant Building, including revisions per the Community Development Department, Engineering Division, Fire Department, and Water Department, if any: a. Portillo's Restaurant Final Engineering Site Layout Plan, Sheet C-01, prepared by ATWELL, dated June 14, 2012; and b. Portillo's Restaurant Final Engineering Site Landscape Plan, Sheet C-04, prepared by ATWELL, dated June 14, 2012. 4. Substantial conformance with the following drawings pertaining to the architecture and construction of the Portillo's Restaurant Building, prepared by Jensen & Jensen, including revisions by the Community Development Department, Engineering Division, Fire Department, and Water Department, if any: a. Restaurant Rendering ("Proposed Restaurant for Portillo's Hot Dogs"), dated June 25, 2012; b. Exterior Building Elevations, Sheets A-4.0 and A-4.1, both dated June 15,2012; c. Floor Plan &Notes, Sheet A-1.0, dated June 15, 2012; and d. Trash Enclosure Plan, Elevations, and Sections, Sheet A-9.0, dated June 15, 2012. 5. Substantial conformance to the following drawings pertaining to only the site improvements associated with a Future Retail Building, including revisions per the Community Development Department, Engineering Division, Fire Department, and Water Department, if any: • Page 8 of 9 a. Retail Final Engineering Site Layout Plan, Sheet C-01, prepared by ATWELL, dated • June 14, 2012 and revised June 29, 2012; and b. Retail Final Engineering Site Landscape Plan, Sheet C-04, prepared by ATWELL, dated June 14, 2012 and revised June 29, 2012. 6. Substantial conformance with the drawing labeled Site Lighting Photometrics, prepared by Jensen & Jensen, dated June 15, 2012 and the associated eight (8) pages of fixture cut sheets re ared b p p y L i s Industries, dated December 6, 2011. 7. Substantial conformance with the ten (10) pages of drawings pertaining to the signage for the Portillo's Restaurant Building and the Future Retail Building, prepared by Olympic Signs, dated February 16, 2012, revised June 14, 2012 (except Sheet 8 which was revised June 26, 2012), including revisions by the Community Development Department, Engineering Division, Fire Department, and Water Department, if any. 8. Compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances. Respectfully Submitted, s/ Bob Siljestrom Bob Siljestrom, Chairman Planning and Zoning Commission • s/ Sarosh Saher Sarosh Saher, Secretary Planning and Zoning Commission Page 9 of 9