Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout81-0217 H.W. Lochner T Illinois Department of Transportation 2300 South Dirksen Parkway/Springfield, Illinois/62764 • March 25, 1981 FEDERAL-AID URBAN PROGRAM City of Elgin Section 79-00113-00-BR Project M-5172(25) Job No. P-91-539-78 Preliminary Engineering Agreement Ms. Marie Yearman City Clerk 150 Dexter Court Elgin, Illinois 60120 Dear Ms. Yearman: The agreement for preliminary engineering services dated February 17, 1981, between the City of Elgin and H. W. Lochner, Incorporated, for certain engineering services to be performed in connection with the subject improvement, was approved by the department and authorized by the Federal Highway Administration on March 17, 1981. A copy of their authorization is attached for your information. The agreement is approved with the understanding that the upper limit of compensation shall be reduced from $169,626.00 since the consul- tant's FY-80 approved overhead and burden rate is 123.96% in lieu of the 130.25% shown in the agreement. Please furnish the department corrected supporting exhibits for insertion in the approved agreement reflecting the approved FY-80 overhead and burden rate. The city is hereby authorized to proceed with the engineering work on this project for a total cost of $165,520.00; federal share being $116,212.00. Your file copy of the approved agreement is attached. Very truly yours, Melvin B. Larsen Engineer •f Local Rgajl and Streets // By: L lyei. Dixon Local Project Implementation Engineer cc- Melford Dahl , Dir. of Pub. Wks. H. W. Lochner, Inc. S. C. Ziejewski Attn: R. M. Harris David G. Campbell Attn: Don Moredock U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. FEDERAL-AID PROJECT NO. FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION S ee_ Below "• ' STATE PROJECT NO. • LETTER.OF APPROVALAND/OR AUTHORIZATION 1 3. FROM Fed6ral Highway Administration 4, PROGRAM NO. 2-A.—COUNTY NAME Illinois Division 320West Washington Street 5. ITEM NO. Springfield Illinois. 62301 6. TO • Mr. H. W. Monroney, Director of Highways Illinois Department of Transportation 2300 South Dirksen Parkway Springfield, Illinois 62764 Attn: Mr. Melvin B. Larsen, Engineer L of Local Roads and Streets 7, DATE AUTHORIZATION EFFECTIVE 8, FEDERAL ROUTE NUMBER 9. STATE ROUTE NUMBER 3/17/81 10. GENERAL LOCATION: IDOT District 1 • II. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Of WORK As described in your letter of March 16, 1981. 12. YOU APE AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED WITH THE WORK CHECKED BELOW PRLLImINAPY ENC NEE iON TO 0!'TE AMINE LOCA T ION [ [ CONSTRUCTION - ADVEPT1SE FO r' Fr.ECEIP7 CF LIDS ONLY PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR CONTRACT PLAN1 CONSTRUCTION PROCEED ON AN AGREED PRICE AND/OR PREPARATION FORCE ACCOUNT BASIS { j ACQUISITION OF FliGHT.OF WAY I XI OTHER (Specify) 13. REMARKS Authorization is given to proceed with all necessary actions to advance and complete the following projects which are described in the attachments to your letter, in accordance with currently approved Certification Acceptance Procedures: IX 5003(562) IX-848(55) F-525(53) M-5003(623) M-5172(25) 14-4443-44444 Ix-5000(214) M-5003(615) M-5003(612) -144-44044444- M-5000(173) M-5003(439) M-5000(128) IX-5003(695) M-5000(125) M-5003(750) M-5003(766) It is understood that work under Phase II will not commence until all prerequisites related to NEPA and the State' s Action Plan have been satisfied. cc: Mr. I. V. Moreno Mr. D. G. Campbell 414 • 14. DATE IS ir S'G'"''" QF YaP;;V:Ncicinile'rAL 1 " Tn-Vivision Administrator 3/17/81 BY: CA e -. F Acting District Engineer ()SP, State of Illinois County of Kane ss Certificate of City Clerk City of Elgin I, Marie Yearman, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that I am the City Clerk of the City of Elgin, Illinois, and that as such City Clerk I am the keeper and custodian of the files and records of said City of Elgin and the seal thereof. I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the attached is a full,true,and correct copy of 1 ....... .. .?.. . . > /7 It'. a.. . . 2 • . .1 f I i the original of which is entrusted to my care for safe keeping. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the/corporate seal of the City of Elgin at the said City in the County and State aforesaid this / day of G , 19.a 4. k.a.c.. ... -,_44.._,.(4-:ri---a1t—`VN--/�C City Cilerk. (SEAL) RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT WITH H.W. LOCHNER, INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, that Leo Nelson, City Manager, and Marie Yearman, City Clerk, be and are hereby respectively authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City of Elgin an agreement with H.W. Lochner, Inc. for engineering serVices for the North End Bridge Project, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: February 11, 1981 Adopted: February 11, 1981 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Attest: s/ Nancy L. Johnson Nancy E. Johnson, Acting City Clerk r f 0 a r F AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT'S SERVICES BETWEEN F THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS F AND F CONSULTANT H. W. LOCHNER, INC. 20 North Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 DESCRIPTION There are three phases to this Project: Phase I - Design/Location and Environmental Studies; Phase II - Preparation of Contract Plans; and Phase III - Construc- tion Inspection Services. This Agreement involves compensation for the work required to complete Phase I only. The work includes the preparation of a Draft and a Final Design/Location Report, a Draft and a Final Environmental Impact Statement and related reports for the North End Bridge and its connecting approach roadways from the intersection of Timber Road and State Street (Illinois Route 31) to the intersection of Summit Street and Dundee Avenue (Illinois Route 58) a length of approximately of 1.76 miles in the City of Elgin, Kane County, Illinois. FAU PROJECT M - 5172 (11) r r AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES r This is an AGREEMENT between the CITY OF ELGIN, acting through its CITY MANAGER and CITY COUNCIL, hereinafter referred to as the CITY, and H. W. LOCHNER, INC. of 20 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606, a corporation certified by the Secretary of State to be in Good Standing and authorized to do business in Illinois under the Business Corporation Act, June 7, 1956, a firm of Consultants, hereinafter referred to as the CONSULTANT. The CITY proposes to engage the CONSULTANT to furnish certain Phase I professional services in connection with the construction of the North End Bridge and its connecting roadways from the intersection of Big Timber Road and State Street to the intersection of Summit Street and Dundee Avenue, such services to include design/location studies, environmental studies and a public participation program related to these studies. Detailed analyses will also be considered for a 5 to 10 year stage construction period which would affect Slade Avenue between Grove Avenue and Dundee Avenue. Phase II work, design and preparation of contract plans; and Phase III work, construction inspection services, would follow pending appropriate approvals. This work is hereinafter referred to as the PROJECT. The CONSULTANT represents that he is in compliance with Illinois Statutes relating to professional registration of individuals, and to corporate practice, for rendering such services. IPB In consideration of these premises, the parties hereto agree as set forth in the following pages number 2 through 6 inclusive. This AGREEMENT executed this I ) — day of re brzt , 198 . CITY OF ELGIN H. W. LOCHNER, INC. • CHICAGO, ILLINOIS By IAA A . By (I / Title A 411i IM.hrAA Title / Ad41.1 414 By \a,„, ) B Ct Ah. Title 0.A.C.1( Title Ckcci— e 44'12 .4444. fccI-. L pm p ik (SEAL) 1 State Contract No. FAU Project M-5172 (*) OS) State Illinois CERTIFICATION OF ENGINEER I hereby certify that I am the President and duly authorized representative of the firm of H. W. Lochner, Inc. whose address is 20 North Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606, and that neither I nor the above firm I hereby represent has: (a) employed or retained for a commission, percentage, brokerage, contingent 11.1 for, or other consideration, any firm or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above consultant) to solicit or secure this contract. (b) agreed, as an express or implied condition for obtaining this contract, to employ or retain the services of any firm or person in connection with carrying out the contract, or (c) paid, or agreed to pay, to any firm, organization or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for me or the above consultant) any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind for, or in connection with, procuring or carrying out the contract; except as here expressly stated (if any): p I I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished to the State Highway Department I/ and the Federal Highway Administration in connection with this contract involving parti- cipation of Federal-Aid highway funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, PIP both criminal and civil. kk /1) /fyi ) e hefil„ Date /fry W. Lochner, Jr. rP la r State Contract No. FAU Project M-5172 (E) 05) State Illinois CERTIFICATION OF CITY I hereby certify that I am the Mayor of the City of Elgin of the State of Illinois, and that the consulting firm of H. W. Lochner, Inc. or its representative has not been required, directly or indirectly as an express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this contract to: (a) employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person, or (b) pay or agree to pay, to any firm, person, or organization, any fee, contri- bution, donation, or consideration of any kind; except as here expressly stated (if any): I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished the State Highway Department and the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this contract involving participation of Federal-Aid highway funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil. 016, I)/ Litetii:k4 -7i/ Date eu ed/Or lb • • . Federal-aid Project /2-5/7ca (Q5,) • Kar7County, Illinois • CiYt[/ of L. lq /h CERTIFICATION OF STATE I hereby certify. that I am the Director of Highways of the Department of Transportation of the State of Illinois, and that the ENGINEER or his representative has not been required, directly or. indirectly as an express or implied condition in connection with obtaining or carrying out this AGREEMENT to (a) employ or retain, or agree to employ or retain, any firm or person or, (b) pay, or agree to pay, to any firm, person or organization, any fee, contribution, donation, or consideration of any kind; except as here expressly stated (if any) ' I acknowledge that this certificate is to be furnished the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, in connection with this AGREEMENT involving participation of Federal-aid highway funds, and is subject to applicable State and Federal laws, both criminal and civil. 'larc /7, 1/Pi Ade/ �...:r.... (Date) irector of ighways/ { 1. INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE The Illinois Department of Transportation's (hereinafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT) "Standard Agreement Provisions for Consultant Services - 1977" hereinafter referred to as the "Standard Provisions" are incorporated and made part of this AGREEMENT except as deleted, amended or supplemented hereinafter. Wherever the word DEPARTMENT is used, it shall be constructed to mean the CITY OF ELGIN, except the word DEPARTMENT shall also include the I.D.O.T. in subsections 2.12, 2.24, 2.31, 2.32 and 2.33. STANDARD PROVISIONS section references are shown as S P in paranthesis. �. 1.1 (S P 3) Delete. 1.2 (5 P 1.09) The Bureau Chief is the Engineer of Location and Environment. 1.3 (S P 1.18) The DEPARTMENT is the Illinois Department of Transportation (I.D.O.T). 1.4 (S P 2.11) Add the following to this S P: For the conduct of environmental studies and preparation of environmental reports, fully qualified persons who are not registered in any category may be employed in responsible charge of elements of such work. 1.5 (S P 2.21c) AGREEMENT for delays as provided under Section adjustmentsY 2.21c of the STANDARD PROVISIONS shall be based on the fact that the fee was negotiated anticipating that the Work on Phase I would be completed by mid-1982 including 120 days review time. 1.6 (S P 2.27) "Policies and Procedures" is revised as follows: Section (2.27b) Department's Publications, Item (15) should be entitled "Ecological and Natural Resources Manual" and Item 18 has been deleted. Section (2.27c) The Federal Aid Highway Program Manual list is revised as follows: Item (3) should read FHPM 7-7-4, Item (7) FHPM 6-1-2-2 has been superseded by FHPM 1-7-2 "Administration of Negotiated Contracts" and add Item 11 FHPM 6-7-3-2 "Location and Hydraulic Design of Encroachments on Flood Plains". PD 1.7 In compliance with the Illinois Purchasing Act, the CONSULTANT in signing this AGREEMENT, makes the following certification which is hereby added to Section 2.30 of the STANDARD PROVISIONS: (S P 2.30) The CONSULTANT certifies that it has not been convicted of ,s. bribery or attempting to bribe an officer or employee of the State of Illinois, nor has the firm made an admission of guilt of such conduct which is a matter of record, nor has an official, agent, or employee of the CONSULTANT committed bribery or attempted bribery on behalf of the firm and pursuant to the direction or authorization of a responsible official of the firm. 1.8 (S P 2.42b) The maximum retainage shall be $8,481. 1.9 (5 P 4.2) The following is substituted for (S P 4.2): The CONSULTANT will utilize available topographic maps prepared for the CITY by the Sidwell Co. .. The scale is 1" = 100' with a contour interval of 2'. rim 2 rr . . . 1.10 (S P 4.30) Amend the beginning of this statement to read: "Using the findings of earlier studies, study all feasible alternate alignments in sufficient detail to eliminate those which are not acceptable. For remaining alternates:". 1.11 (S P 4.32) Soil borings have been completed as necessary, for Phase I. 1.12 (5 P 4.33e) Delete: "lighting, signalization and signing". 1.13 (S P 4.35) Amend to read: "The drainage report will be updated to include requirements of current I.D.O.T. work activities for drainage reports". 2. SCOPE OF WORK - The CONSULTANT shall complete the following work on the PROJECT: Phase I - Since the Corridor for this PROJECT has been previously determined along with the "City's Preferred Alternative", the work tobe accomplished in the remainder of the Work includes: 1) the general study of a one-way couple consisting of Summit and Seneca Streets; 2) a design variant located to avoid the Elgin Salvage Company; and, 3) the Slade Avenue Stage Construction Alternative where the total time to complete the Big Timber/Summit connection could be 5 to 10 years. This Slade Avenue Stage Construction Alternative will be studied to the same detail as the "City's Preferred Alternative". The accompanying map shows the Project Location and highlights the remainder of the Phase I work to be completed. Phase II - Preparation of Contract Plans. Phase III - Construction Inspection Services. 2.1 The CONSULTANT's work includes: a. Drainage Report (15 copies). b. Preliminary T.S.&L. Drawing with scaled dimensions as obtained from 1" = 100' base maps (5 copies). i r r 3 V I ,\ 7 11 NO�r"wEs 1 �.� ELGIN \.. IZi T �T AIRPORT �. �wAr "----, ----.... 4(14 / �.---1 r .,1a,,p7 F.A. I. 90 — 7 J J r _ , _.., j -N ER, w BIG TIMB R RD. ��IJ - aII CONGDON AVE. SHOE FACTORY RD. r . ›.. ,_ --- ,.::„..:.:Amm:fflUtgAVeMo::.WAngi:ii::: 1'i. 0 W Y r Q COa 0 O a O .i: W Y 2-I Y U L._ 0 0 - .., , w,NG .'•'`:''• 2 o a N I 0 ST :::: UMMIT ST a Fr , • 0 Z HIGHLAND \\ILlrIAVE. 1 A MIo CHICAGO ST AVE' • xR N C' r < 11 I V I 5� /<<q riLi o NO' -c W s 1- r•I W W I ~ fn .' LILLIAN ST 0 O H J cr rn Si. 0 Iri U.S. ROUTE 20 =' o 2 r I a \. 1 Iii A\O . T T ra STUDY LOCATION MAP 4 - r c. Preliminary Intersection Design Studies at up to four locations. (10 copies) d. Draft Pre-Hearing Design/Location Report (6 copies) e. Pre-Hearing Design/Location Report (10 copies) f. Pre-Draft Environmental Impact Statement (10 copies) g. Draft Environmental Impact Statement (125 copies) h. Preliminary Noise Report (10 copies) i. Public Meeting Handouts (500 copies) j. Pre-Final Design/Location Report (6 copies) k. Final Design/Location Report (25 copies) 1. Pre-Final Environmental Impact Statement (6 copies) m. Final Environmental Impact Statement (60 copies) n. Final Noise Report (15 copies) o. Preparation of Informational Meetings exhibits and handouts. Assume 3 Public Information Meetings. The CITY will conduct these meetings and the CONSULTANT will participate by making a presentation of the proposed improvement and will be available to answer questions. p. Preparing a monthly or bi-monthly written report and presentation on actual work accomplished. The CITY must concur with the actual work accomplished. 2.2 The Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared in accordance with Section 7.4 of the STANDARD PROVISIONS. 2.3 No 4(f) statement is anticipated. 2.4 The DEPARTMENT will negotiate the next phase (Phase II) of this project only after the Final Design/Location Report and the Final Environmental Impact Statement have been completed and accepted by IDOT and after Design Approval of the PROJECT has been obtained. 3. PROJECT SCHEDULE - The CONSULTANT shall commence work within 10 calendar days after date of Authority to Proceed. The Work shall be completed and delivered to the DEPARTMENT within the following periods: 3.1 The Draft Design/Location Report and the Draft Environmental Impact Statement within 120 calendar days of Authority to Proceed. L r 5 • . . r . • 3.2 The Public Hearing within 60 calendar days of the Department's approval of the Draft Design/Location Report and the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. 3.3 The Final Design/Location Report and the Final Environmental Impact Statement within 90 calendar days of the Public Hearing. 3.4 Phase II - Not applicable. 3.5 Phase III - Not applicable. //`` 4. PRIME COMPENSATION Ir/04 52 O' 4.11 Phase I - The CONSULTANT shall receive, as full pa ent for completing rit the Work required of him under this AGREEMENT (excep for Additional Work or Extra Work), reimbursement of his eligible Actual Cost• in accordance with Section 2.45 of the STANDARD PROVISIONS, plus a Fixed -mount of $19,594, subject to an Upper Limit of Compensation of #169 . • The retainage provisions contained in Section 2.42 of the STAND ' D PROVISIONS shall not apply to Direct Non-Salary Costs. The attached Exhibits A, B and C are to be used as set forth in Section 2.42 of the STANDARD PROVISIONS. None of the work under this AGREEMENT is considered preparation of plans. 4.12 Phase II - Preparation of Contract Plans. The CITY agrees to pay the CONSULTANT for Phase II work specified in the AGREEMENT, cost plus a fixed fee which shall be negotiated when the scope of the PROJECT has been defined in Phase I. Likewise, the Upper Limit of Compensation shall also be negotiated for Phase II Work. 4.13 Phase III - Construction Inspection Services. The CITY agrees to pay the CONSULTANT for Phase III work specified in the AGREEMENT, cost plus a fixed fee which shall be negotiated when the scope of the PROJECT has been defined in Phase II. Likewise, the Upper Limit of Compensation shall also be negotiated for Phase III Work. 4.2 The Prime Compensation may be increased or decreased by subsequent agreement between the contractural and approving parties if there is a major change in the scope, character or complexity of the Work. The fee may be adjusted by Phase in accordance with Section 2.21 of the STANDARD PROVISIONS if the duration of the Work in any phase extends more than six (6) months beyond the date of completion stated in Section 3 of this AGREEMENT due to no fault of the CONSULTANT. 4.3 In the event the CONSULTANT, upon written order from the CITY, is required to perform Extra Work, he shall, in addition to the Prime Compensation, receive payment for such Extra Work on the following basis: The CONSUL- TANT's Actual Costs will be reimbursed in the same manner as set forth in F Section 4.11, plus a negotiated Fixed Amount based on the estimated cost of the Work, subject to a pre-agreed Upper Limit of Compensation for each item of Work. F 1/11 6 r . . • • • . EXHIBIT 'A' H. W. LOCHNER, INC. rHourly Rate Range - CONSULTANT's Regular Staff rClassification From To Project Manager $16.59 $22.62 Project Engineer 15.69 20.51 I Senior Engineer 11 .76 16.29 Design Engineer 9.65 13.88 Junior Engineer 8.04 11.56 r Technician 7.84 11 . 16 Draftsman 5.43 8.75 Tracer 4.50 6.03 IChief Structural Engineer 15.59 20.86 Structural Project Engineer 14.08 18. 10 • Senior Structural Engineer 12.07 15.08 r Structural Engineer 10.06 12.07 Junior Structural Engineer 8.54 10.06 Structural Technician 7.04 9.80 r Structural Draftsman 6.53 8.80 lit Environmental Specialist 8.55 14.33 rSenior Hydraulics Engineer 11.76 16.29 Hydraulics Engineer 9.65 13.88 I Senior Traffic Engineer 12.07 16.29 Traffic Engineer 9.65 13.88 r Senior Planner 9.80 15. 16 L Planner 9.65 10.81 Party Chief 8.15 9.78 Instrument Man 6.03 7.54 Rodman 5.43 6.54 Technical Typist , 4.82 9.05 r I e. I L January, 1980 r - . I_. i 1 . . • • EXHIBIT 'B' H. W. LOCHNER, INC. PAYROLL BURDEN AND FRINGE BENEFIT FISCAL YEAR ENDING MAY 4, 1979 IDOT AUDIT Acct. No. Account Title % 82 & 83 F.I.C.A. 7.96 84 State Unemployment Compensation 2. 18 86 Federal Unemployment Compensation 0.42 88 Group Insurance 2.27 90 Workmen's Compensation Insurance 0.40 Holidays, Sick Leave, Vacations: 197 Holiday Pay 1.55 198 Vacation Pay 7.38 199 Sick Leave 3.56 74 Bonuses - Employees 0.66 72 Seminars & Educational Conferences 0.64 20 & 75 Coffee & Coke & Xmas Gifts 0.38 TOTAL PERCENTAGE 27.40% I I r . . • • . . EXHIBIT 'C' H. W. LOCHNER, INC. rOVERHEAD COSTS FISCAL YEAR ENDING MAY 4, 1979 rIDOT AUDIT • Acct. No. Account Title % r 10 Amortization Leasehold Improvements _ 0.09 12 Auto Expense 1. 19 55 & 110 Self Insurances (deductable) 0.68 r 56 - 62 Comprehensive, Professional, General Insurance 8.52 16 Computer Expense . 8.76 18 Corporation Annual Fees and Taxes 0.07 22 Depreciation - Company Cars 1.51 24 Depreciation - Furniture, Fixtures, Equip. 0.46 26 Drafting and Survey Supplies 1. 12 r 27 Dues 0.34 28 Subscriptions & Publications 0.34 30 Employment Fees 0.73 r 33 Legal, Professional, Accounting 1.91 34 Light and Power 0.55 24 & 36 Machine Maintenance and Rental 0.46 38 Moving Expense 0.55 40 Office Supplies and Expense 2.04 134 & 70 Officers' Compensation 11. 19 42 Postage and Shipping 0.48 r 44 Printing, Blueprinting, Photography 3.80 46 Rent 10.78 191 Secretarial Wages 6.32 erg 196 Weather Wages 0.42 200 Unassigned Salaries 27.67 48 - 54 Taxes 0.83 19 - 125 State Income Taxes -- 118 Federal Income Taxes 64 Telephone and Telegraph 3.73 66 & 80 Travel and Subsistence 8.31 r 100 & 106 Contributions __ 100 & 104 Life Insurance & Physicals 100 & 104 Promotion -- ri. TOTAL OVERHEAD COSTS 102.85% r . RECAP Payroll Burden and Fringe 27.40% . rOverhead Costs 102.85% TOTAL PERCENTAGE 130.25% I > d p w a ¢ 2 Lam,. L.. Lam:. L.,d.. L... Lagoa L.._. L..... r r r r F F F • WORK PROGRAM ADDITIONAL STUDIES ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT . • • • r WORK PROGRAM ADDITIONAL STUDIES ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT The following Work Program is written to identify the engineering and environmental work which must be performed to prepare an update of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement which was submitted to the City of Elgin on September 7, 1979 and subsequently reviewed by the Illinois Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration (FHW A). The tasks in the Work Program reflect the comments of both transportation agencies with respect to the study of additional alternatives and design variations including the following: (1) A one-way couple consisting of Summit and Seneca Streets between Grove Avenue and Dundee Avenue: (2) A realignment of the "City's Preferred Alternative" between approximately the Summit/Brook Street intersection and Lincoln Avenue to avoid the Elgin Salvage and Supply Company and Elgin Wholesale Corporation properties; and, (3) The stage construction impact of a connection to Slade Avenue. Changes in Federal regulations since September 7, 1980 have also been considered in this Work Program and these changes are reflected in the following Federal Aid Highway Program Manuals (FHPM); FHPM 7-7-2 Environmental Impact and Related Statements. FHPM 6-7-3-2 Location and Hydraulic Design of Encroachments on Flood Plains F1-IPM 7-7-3 Procedures for Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise and Construction Noise Other recent Federal regulations applicable to this Work Program include the FHWA's "Five Urban Transportation Policy Objectives" and "Energy Evaluation." All the above regulations would be applied to the previously studied "No-Build Alternative" and "City's Preferred Alternative" as well as the additional alternatives and design variations set forth above. I The work required to successfully complete the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, conduct of the Public Hearing process, Final Environmental Impact Statement, Design Report, and obtain Design Approval for the Project is set forth on the following pages. The work has been stratified into Phase 1.1 and Phase 1.2 and are in compliance with the current work program procedures utilized by the Illinois Department of Transportation. While Phase 1.1 and Phase 1.2 were not incorporated into the Engineering Agreement between the CONSULTANT and the CITY OF ELGIN, as executed on December 17, 1975, they will be utilized in this Work Program so that all remaining work in Phase I is placed into sub-divisions on Phase I. This will keep the Work Program consistent with the terms of the earlier Engineering Agreement. The remaining work in Phase I will be set forth as follows: PHASE 1.1 - DETAILED ANALYSES - Through Draft E.I.S. Section A - Design • Section B - Environmental Section C - Public Participation PHASE 1.2 - STUDY CONCLUSION - Public Hearing Through Design Approval Section A - Design Section B - Environmental Section C - Public Participation The work items, for each sub-division of Phase I, have been correlated with the I.D.O.T.'s standard forms - "Cost Estimate of Consultant Services" - for tasks involving design studies, environmental studies and public participation. A brief description of the tasks involved in each work item follows along with man-hour estimates to accomplish each of the tasks. r r r r L r r MAN-HOURS BY WORK ITEM PHASE I.I DETAILED ANALYSES - Through Draft E.I.S. r r !PP r r I r r- MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE . . ADDITIONAL STUDIES PHASE'l'.1 - rSECTION A - DESIGN ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT . • MAN-HOURS • WORK ITEMS • - (Refer to Cost Estimate of Consultant Services Form) a. b. c. d. Total 1. Compilation of Data a. Pavement, right of way, utility and drainage data. — 40 • 40 16 96 b. Traffic data. 4 16 . 12 — 32 2. Mosaics Review need for, and request additional mapping coverage. II" 7. Base Maps — 8 — — 8 a. Prepare aerials for use as base maps. - - 16 16 32 b. Prepare Plan/Profile sheets. 4 4 8 24 40 8. Design/Location Studies a. Additions to Drainage Study and Report. 4 . 48 60 8 120 . b. Detailed Line, Grade and Geometric Studies. , 8 32 72 128 240 c. Access and Parking Considerations. - 16 8 16 40 d. Cross Section Studies. 4 8 12 16 40 ii e. Utility Adjustments. 8 8 16 • f. Cost Estimates 8 20 40 12 80 0. Intersection Design Studies Up to four preliminary IDS's would be prepared for intersections along Slade Avenue. 16 72 200 112 400 12. Preliminary R.O.W. Preliminary R.O.W. requirements. would be determined. graphically. 4 24 16 36 80. 13. Draft Design/Location Report Revise the Draft Design/Location Report to include the new alternatives and design variations. . . 24 • 40 128 128 320 4 16. .Administrative Management typing. rance of financial and schedule controls, clerical and 12 12 - 56 TOTAL PHASE 1.1 - SECTION A . - 88 340 620 57680 1624 !10 .' . . - - • . - . , MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE IPHASE 1.1 . ADDITIONAL STUDIES SECTION B -*ENVIRONMENTAL ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT I . . . WORK ITEMS a. b. MAN-HOURS 1. Inventory Existing Ecosystems c. d. Total • Gather supplemental data. Prepare and submit the new Request for Biologic Survey Assessment form to IDOT.* — 16 16 8 40 2. Inventory Existing Land Use Parcel-by-parcel usage. — 8 16 16 40 3. Inventory Existing Facility Deficiencies • Accident and capacity analyses along Slade Avenue between Grove Avenue and Dundee Avenue. 4 16 16 4 40 4. Inventory Socio-Economic Factors Obtain additional neighborhood data. — • 16 16 8 40 5. Compile Historic Resume Collect and document additional historic building data. Assume no historic buildings will be taken. 4 12 16 — 32 6. Select Possible Alternates Identify advantages and disadvantages of each Alternate. 8 16 16 — 40 8. Perform Noise Analysis a. Perform noise analysis for 15 new locations along new alignments. - 8 100 96 40 244 b. Contours would not be developed. However, distances from edge of pavement to location where design Noise Level Criteria is met would be computed and illustrated. — — 24 8 32 • c. Abatement measures would be discussed in general terms. — 24 — - — 24 . .; d. Modify the Interim Noise Report to incorporate • , the changes. 12 72 . 60 32 176 9. Conduct Air Quality Analysis An Air Quality Analysis would be performed at two locations utilizing procedures in compliance with the IDOT Air Quality Manual. — 32 — 8 40 - - il - - MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE . . i PHASE I.1 ADDITIONAL STUDIES SECTION B - ENVIRONMENTAL ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT I . • _ rWORK ITEMS MAN-HOURS a. b. c. d. Total r10. Determine Comprehensive Impacts • r a. Analyze and evaluate all environmental and socio- economic impacts. 14 48 48 — 110 I b. Determine energy consumption estimates for construction and operation of the final alternatives. 4 16 16 4 40 c. Request a wetland determination from the Army Corps. IWe assume that this project does not impact any wetlands. — 16 — — 16 d. A flood plain encroachment investigation would be . r performed. The IDOT Project Report Supplement - Flood Plain Crossing Potential Encroachment form, along with a summary report and a map would be prepared prior I to the Public Hearing. 16 • 64 56 24 160 .1. Identify Measures to Minimize Harm rSpecific proposals for each of the final alternatives. 8 16 — — 24 2. Prepare Draft E.I.S. ra. Revise existing Draft E.I.S. to incorporate the new alternates and design variants; to strengthen the I discussion on the infeasibility of the Wing/Summit alternate; and to expand the discussion on potential impacts along Slade Avenue. 24 120 116 120 380 r b. Add a "Summary" to the DEIS, conforming to the new EIS format in the revised FHPM 7-7-2. 8 32 — — 40 rc. Publish and circulate DEIS. 8 16 16 80 120 r . I TOTAL PHASE LI - SECTION B 118 640 528 352 1638 Lu r 7 , ,,.. 1 i MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE • PHASE,' 1.1 . • ADDITIONAL STUDIES SECTION C - PUBLIC PARTICIPATIONr ' 1 ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT . . • MAN-HOURS b. WORK ITEMS . a. . . c. d. Total • 2. Group and Individual Meetings - - Meet with agencies groups and individuals primarily concerned with the impacts of the various alternatives and design variants. 64 136 — — 200 6. Documentation Memoranda to cover meetings and phone calls plus letters of • correspondence associated with meetings. 16 64 — , - 80 . . • TOTAL - PHASE 1.1 -- SECTION C 80 200 — ' — 280 . , . TOTAL - PHASE 1.1 - SECTIONS A+B+C 286 1180 1148 928 3542 r, • 11 .. . . • . , • - . . - . . A — . : _ • I r I I I I I MAN-HOURS BY WORK ITEM PHASE 1.2 STUDY CONCLUSION - Public Hearing Through Design Approval rMAN-HOUR ESTIMATE PHASE 1.2 ADDITIONAL STUDIES SECTION A - DESIGN ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT MAN-HOURS • WORK ITEMS a. b. c. d. Total (Refer to Cost Estimate of Consultant Services Form) 8. Design Location Studies • Modification of design details. Only minor modifications expected. 4 12 8 16 40 10. Intersection Design Studies Modify all previously submitted I.D.S.'s. Only minor modifications expected. 4 12 8 16 40 11. Bridge Inspection Report Modify and finalize bridge sketches. Only minor modifications expected. 4 12 16 32 12. Preliminary R.O.W. Plans • • Modify the preliminary R.O.W. plans to include any changes in design. Only minor modifications expected. 4 4 8 16 32 15. Final Design Report Modify as necessary. Only minor modifications expected. 8 32 40 40 120 • • 16. Administrative Management Maintenance of financial and schedule controls, clerical and typing. 40 — 80 120 TOTAL - PHASE 1.2 - SECTION A 60 64 76 184 384 Li • • MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE 1 PHASE 1.2. ADDITIONAL STUDIES SECTION B - 'ENVIRONMENTAL ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT I . . r WORK ITEMS MAN-HOURS a. b. c. d. Total ri8. Perform Noise Analysis It is expected that the minor design changes will not influence the noise analysis conducted in Phase II nor would 1.1 there by any further consideration of noise abatement mea- sures. — — — — 0 13. Analyze Adverse Comments rMutual review and analysis of all Public Hearing documents by the City and Consultant. 8 ri8 • 16 8 40 14. Prepare Final E.I.S. J a. Changes, rewrites, additions, exclusions, etc. 8 32 8 32 80 [ • b. Prepare, .type and publish up to ten draft Final E.I.S. reports for agency review. — 16 16 28 60 Ic. Prepare final E.I.S. for printer. Up to 60 copies would be printed. — 4 12 24 40 • JTOTAL - PHASE 1.2 - SECTION B 16 60 52 92 220 L J • ..- _ . • , • • • - . MAN-HOUR ESTIMATE PHASE 1.2 . . ADDITIONAL STUDIES SECTION C - PUBLIC PARTICIPATION rELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT • ' . _ rMAN-HOURS ' WORK ITEMS a. b. C. d. Total 4. Public Hearing - r a. Prepare for Public Hearing. The Consultant-. would prepare a presentation and graphic displays of the Project along with a draft public notice for local newspapers. It is re assumed that the City would make arrangements for the Public Hearing location. 12 12 16 40 80 r b. Attend Public Hearing. 5 10 5 - 20 c. Document Public Hearing, review and answer correspondence, and handle phone calls. 24 56 - - 80 r5. Continued Coordination rMeetings with groups, officials and individuals during finalization of designs. 40 40 - - 80 E, 6. Documentation Of meetings, phone calls, letters, etc. 16 24 - - 40 r . . TOTAL - PHASE 1.2 - SECTION C 97 142 21 40 300 I TOTAL - PHASE 1.2 - SECTIONS A+B+C 173 266 149 316 904 r 0 L r • r r . • . . . r _ r • . . , )ule Elgin North End Bridge , :clion Big Timber Rd. to Dundee Avenue COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT'S SERVICES roject FAU Project M-5172 (iii) (, -) SUMMARY )unty Kane . At No. Consultant,H.W. LOCHNER, INC. Dole November 3, 1980 Estimated Cost in Dollars Number %/ 0 ITEM of Overhead In-House of Mon Payroll 8 Direct Subtotal Net Fee Services TOTAL Grand Hours Fringe by Others Costs Total (A ) (8 ) Be(C� )s ( D 1 ( E ) ( F ) ( G 1 (H ) ( I 1 Phase I.1 Section A 1,624 19,333 25,181 2,000 46,514 6,677 400 53,591 Section B 1,638 21,186 27,596 8,100 56,882 7,317 - 64,199 Section C 280 4,440 5,783 450 10,673 1,534 - 12,207 , SUB-TOTAL 3,542 44,959 58,560 10,550 114,069 15,528 400 129,997 Phase I.2 Section A 384 4,623 6,021 2,450 13,094 1,596 - 14,690 Section B 220 2,627 3,422 4,850 10,899 907 - 11,806 t Section C 300 4,525 5,895 1,150 11,570 1,563 - 13,133 SUB-TOTAL 904 11,775 15,338 8,450 35,563 4,066 - 39,629 , , - - ._ TOTALS 4,44A 56.734 73.898 19,000 149,A1 19 94 4170 - (56 77 3(/ 4 _, Y`/f �C l i y i,,7 ,-`r- --/(_,,-- ..--L--- r r r F I r APPENDIX Supportive Data Used in the Calculation of the Cost Estimate for Consultant's Services I I P P F • . . . . EXHIBIT D MANPOWER TYPES AND AVERAGE RATES USED FOR CALCULATION OF FEE r a. Project Manager and Support Specialists - Project Manager and Chief Structural Engineer b. Senior Engineers - Project Engineers, Senior Engineers, Environmental Engineers and Senior Planners. c. Engineers and Planners - Highway Engineers, Civil Engineers, Urban Planners, Traffic Engineers, • Transportation Engineers, Structural Engineers and Environmental Planners. d. Technicians, Draftsmen - Non-engineers and non-planners oriented to Civil Engineering. MANPOWER RATES a. Project Manager and Support Specialists 19.00 b. Senior Engineers 14.60 rc. Engineers and Planners 12.35 d. Technicians, Draftsmen 8.75 H. W. Lochner, Inc. March, 1980 r • • EXHIBIT D. 1 AVERAGE HOURLY PROJECT RATES* Elgin North End Bridge Project Average Percent of Weighted Position** Salary Participation Rate a. 20.50 5 $1.03 b. 16.00 20 3.20 c. 13.50 34 4.59 d. 9.60 41 3.94 Average Payroll Rate - - $12.76 * Calculated from an estimate of actual staff to be assigned to the project and their current pay rates including anticipated adjustments during the period of the contract, which is assumed to extend through mid-1982. ** a. Project Manager and Chief Structural Engineer b. Project Engineers, Senior Engineers, Environmental Engineers and Senior Planners. c. Highway Engineers, Civil Engineers, Urban Planners, Traffic Engineers, Transportation Engineers, Structural Engineers and Environmental Planners. d. Non-engineers and non-planners oriented to Civil Engineering. I January 15, 1981 rEXHIBIT D.2 . . ri: MEMORANDUM TO: Elgin North End Bridge Project No. 73203 7 FROM: Bern Guentner DATE: January 15, 1981 7 SUBJECT: Average Hourly Rates 7 In a recent conversation with Ted Lambousis in the Schaumburg District One office of I.D.O.T., I was requested to further substantiate the average man-hour rate of $12.76 as calculated from the summary cost sheet in the Agreement for Consultant's Services for r the North End Bridge Project. That information is now furnished with our form entitled "Average Hourly Project Rates" dated January 15, 1981. In addition to that form, I have provided below the average man-hour rates experienced for similar work conducted for r the I.D.O.T. and for Elgin, by H. W. Lochner, Inc., during the May through December period of 1980 - which represents the most recent experience for our current fiscal year. r I.D.O.T. Salaries Hours Average Project Name Job No. Paid Worked Rate Lake Front Highway P-91-222-69 2,308 164 14.07 r( Route 14/Mc Henry County P-91-827-73 16,366 1417 11.55 Harlem Avenue/Cook County P-91-336-78 23,273 2012 11.57 FAP 407/Hancock/Mc Donough P-96-020-69 48, 177 4037 11.93 rElgin North End Bridge N.A. 1 ,757 127 13.83 Totals $91 ,881 7757 $11.84 The average payroll rate of $12.76er hour, as shown on the "Average Hourly Project P g Rates" sheet, is 7.8 percent higher than the $11.84 per hour experienced in the latter portion of 1980. This increase for work to be conducted over the next 12 months, or so, is consistent with the rising salary costs experienced over the past 12 months. 7 BFG:gh r r r - I ."..11 1 - 1 1 1 10"'''7 qrs.,' ."1 r11 ',r.."1 !�""1 *""`7 ir,rviii ' '1 '""gi "e.'"1 *"ni firPlell '"„'_i EXHIBIT E • DIRECT COST SUMMARY • (ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE) LOCATION/DESIGN STUDIES • TRAVEL & PHASE PRINTING DOCUMENTS SPECIALISTS COMPUTER SUBSISTENCE TOTAL PHASE I.1 SECTION A 550 1 ,150 400 - 300 2,400 SECTION B 1 ,600 5,750 - 500 250 8, 100 SECTION C . 200 - - - 250 450 *SUB-TOTAL 2,350 6,900 400 500 800 10,950 PHASE I.2 SECTION A 300 1,950 - - 200 2,450 SECTION B 200 4,650 - - - 4,850 SECTION C 800 - - - 350 1,150 *SUB-TOTAL 1,300 6,600 550 8,450 TOTAL 3,650 13,500 400 500 1,350 19,400 * Attach work$heets used to compute sub-totals. p- . . . . r I EXHIBIT F PHASE 1.1 -- SECTION A DIRECT COSTS ADDITIONAL STUDIES - ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT I P Printing Printing, Blueprints, Xerox $ 500 Photographic Work (Film & Developing) 50 6 Advance Copies of Draft Design Report 150 10 Copies of Draft Design Report 1,000 Total Printing Costs $ 1,700 Specialist Appraiser (1 day @ $400) $ 400 Total Specialist Costs 400 Travel and Subsistence Trip Purpose No. of Trips Compilation of Data 2 Design/Location Studies 2 IDS's 1 Preliminary ROW Plans 1 Total Travel and Subsistence 6 auto-days @ $50 300 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS - PHASE 1.1 - SECTION A $ 2,400 F r 1. . . . . IMP EXHIBIT G PHASE 1.1 -- SECTION B DIRECT COSTS ADDITIONAL STUDIES - ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT I Printing Printing, Blueprints, Xerox $ 1,500 Photographic Work (Film and Developing) 100 10 Advance Copies of DEIS 1,250 125 Copies of DEIS 4,000 10 Copies of Preliminary Noise Report 500 Total Printing Costs $ 7,350 Computer Noise Level Projections $ 500 Total Computer Costs 500 Travel and Subsistence Trip Purpose No. of Trips Inventory Existing Ecosystems 1 Inventory Existing Land Use 1 Inventory Socio-economic Factors 1 Select Noise Analysis Sites 1 Identify Measure to Minimize Harm 1 Total Travel and Subsistence 5 auto days @ $50 250 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS - PHASE 1.1 - SECTION B $ 8,100 r PHASEEIX.IHI_B_ITH SECTION C DIRECT COSTS ADDITIONAL STUDIES - ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT p. Printing Printing, Blueprints, Xerox $ 200 Total Printing Costs $ 200 Travel and Subsistence Trip Purpose No. of Trips Liaison and Public Involvement 5 auto days (a $50 250 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS - PHASE 1.1 - SECTION C $ 450 . . r EXHIBIT I PHASE 1.2 -- SECTION A re DIRECT COSTS ADDITIONAL STUDIES - ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT r Printing Printing, Blueprints, Xerox $ 300 6 Copies of Pre-Final Design Report 25 Copies of Final Design Report 450 1,500 Total Printing Costs $ 2,250 !al Travel and Subsistence Trip Purpose No. of Trips Design Location Studies 1 Intersection Design Studies 1 Bridge Inspection Report 1 Preliminary R.O.W. 1 Total Travel and Subsistence 4 auto days @ $50 200 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS - PHASE 1.2 - SECTION A $ 2,450 L I I L Pin . . r r EXHIBIT J PHASE 1.2 -- SECTION B DIRECT COSTS ADDITIONAL STUDIES - ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT r r Printing Printing, Blueprints, Xerox $ 200 6 Copies of Pre-Final EIS 900 60 Copies of Final EIS 3,000 Po 15 Copies of Noise Report 750 Total Printing Costs $ 4,850 r TOTAL DIRECT COSTS - PHASE 1.2 - SECTION B $ 4,850 r EXHIBIT K PHASE 1.2 -- SECTION C DIRECT COSTS ADDITIONAL STUDIES - ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT IP A Printing Printing, Blueprints, Xerox $ 300 Photographic Slides 200 Handouts - Public Hearing (500 copies) 300 Total Printing Costs $ 800 Travel and Subsistence Trip Purpose No. of Trips Public Hearing 1 Continued Coordination 6 Total Travel and Subsistence 7 auto days @ $50 350 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS - PHASE 1.2 - SECTION C $ 1,150 XHII3IT L Route Elgin North End Bridge COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES (Location Study) , ,Sart ipn Big Timber Rd. to Dundee Ave. Project FAU Project M-5172 (#) <�.5) Phase 1.1, Section A - Design Consultant H. W. LOCHNER, INC. Date November 3, 1980' County Kane Job No. . Nunber Estimated Cost in Dollars Item Net Fee % of of Overhead In-house Subtotal * Services Grand �s Payroll Frin a Direct by Others Total Total (A) (B) Benefits Costs (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (C) (n) , 1 Compilation of Data 128 1,676 2,183 150 4,009 579 4,588 2 Mosaics 8 117 152 269 40 309 3 Corridor Studies 4 Pre-hearing Report (Cor) 5 Corridor Hearing • 6 Final Corridor Report 7 Base Maps 72 781 1,017 200 1,998 270 2,268 8 Design Loc. Studies 536 6,381 _ 8,312 200 14,893 2,204 4 17,097 9 Borings and Analyses 10 Intersec. Design Studies 400 4,805 , 6,259 150 11,214 , 1,660 12,874 11 Br. Insp. Rpt.&TS&L Draws. 12 Preliminary ROW Plans 80 939 1,223 100 2,262 324 400 2,986 13 Pre-hearing Report (Des) 320 3,741 4,872 1,200 9,813 1,292 4 11,105 14 Design Hearing 15 Final Design Report . 16 Administrative Prof; Mgmt. 80 893 1,163 2,056 308 2364 Totals1,624 19,333 25,181 2,000 46,514 6,677 400 53,591 r * See Exhibit R '1 P"'"I ru"11 '1 '1 ir--1 '1 r's-11 P'11 MBIT711 P-11 r-i r--1 r--1 v-"1 r'll u'.••I 1-" 1 Rite Elgin North End Bridge COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT SERVI(P.S (Environmental) Section- Big Timber Rd. to Dundee Ave. ' Phase 1.1, Section B - Environmental Project FAU Project M-5172;410 (. .5..„) Consultant H. W. LOCHNER, INC. Date November 3, 1980 • County Kane Job No. . ••••••••• ••..m... 1.1..mr Estimated Cost in Dollars Number 'werneaci ! Net Fee* of & In-House $ of Item Man Payroll Fringe Direct Subtotal Services Total Grand Hcurs Benefits Costs . By Others Total (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) fF) ( 1 .LH) (I) 1.Invt. Existing Ecosystems 40 501 653 200 1,354 173 1, 7 _______ 2.Invt. Existing Land Use 40 454 592 150 1,196 157 1.353 3.Invt. Existing Fac. Def. 40 542 706 100 1,348 187 1,535 , 4.Invt. Socio-Econo. Factors 40 501 , 653 200 , 1,354 173 1,527 5.Ccrnpile Historic Resume 32 449 585 100 , 1,134 • 155 1,289 6.Sel. Feasible Alternative 40 583 760 200 1,543 201 1,744 7.Con1uct Noise Measurement 8.Perfonn Noise Analysis 476 L 6,165 8,029 1,200 , 15,394 2,129 . 17,523 9.Concluct Air Quality Anlys, 40 537 700 , 100 12_337 186 1,523 10. termine arnpreh.Impacts ' 326 4,475 , 5,829 200 10,504 1,546 12,050 ii_Ident.Meas. to Min.Harm 24 386 502 150 1,038 133 . , 1.171 I2.Prepare Draft Statement 540 6,593 8,587 _ 5,500 20,680 2,277 22,957 , 13.Analyze Adverse C.cm-nents 14.Prepare Final Statement • ).5.Stucly Alt.Use of itifi Land , _____ 1- 16.Prepare 4(f) Statement 7 .P.Kgpare Neq,,Declaration Totals 1,638 21,186 27,596 8,100 56,882 7 317 64,199 * See Exhibit R '.'_-1 ' i '1'1 "'I "'i "'II Ir'll *,::i 1 7'1 4'1 F-1 "F"'"1 ,1'1 *R.."1 ,.,, *-1 Route Elgin North End Bridge EXHIBIT N Section Big Timber Rd. to Dundee Avenue COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANTS SERVICES . Project FAU Project M-5172 (iim Cot$) Phase I.1, Section C - Public Participation , County Kane Job No. Consultant H. W. Lochner, Inc. Date November 3, 1980 Estimated Cost in Dollars Number ITEM of Overhead In-House Net Fee* of Mon Payroll a Direct Subtotal Services TOTAL Grand Hours Fringe Costs by Others Total (A ) (B ) Benefits (D ) (E ) ( F ) (G ) (H ) ( I ) I. Early Coordination 2. Group & Individual Meetings 200 3,202 4,170 400 7,772 1,106 8,878 3. Public Meetings 4. Public Hearings 5. Continued Coordination 6. Documentation 80 1,238 1,613 50 2,901 428 3,329 1 TOTALS 280 4,440 5,783 450 10,673 1,534 12,207 * See Exhibit R w. .,1 P""""A! 1"-1 1 "'"'"1 r"mi AMB1— Route Elgin North End Bridge COST ESTIMATE I QCFCONSULTANT SERVICES (Location Study) , a .. Bi• •i, .- : . . 1 ..- - _ - . - Project FAU Protect M-5172 ( `at5) Phase.I.2, Section A - Design Consultant H. W. Lochner, Inc. Date November 3, 1980' . , County Kane - Job No. Number Estimated Cost in Dollars Itett► of Overhead Net Fee* % of In-house Subtotal Services Grand Hours Payroll Fr'in a Direct by Others Total Total (A) (B) Benefits Costs (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (C) (n) . 1 Compilation of Data 2 Mosaics • 3 Corridor Studies 4 Pre-hearing Report (Cor) 5 Corridor Hearing . 6 Final Corridor Report 7 Base Maps 8 Design Loc. Studies 40 / 490 638 100 , 1,228 169 . 1,397 9 Borings and Analyses 10 Intersec. Design Studies 40 490 638 100 1,228 169 1,397 , r 11 Br. Insp. Rpt.&TS&L Draws. 32 347 451 75 873 120 993 12 Preliminary ROW Plans 32 373 486 75 934 129 1 1,063 4 13 Pre-hearing Report (Des) 14 Design Hearing 15 Final Design Report 120 1,463 _ • 1,906 2,100 5,469 505 5,974 16 Administrative Pro). Mgmt. 120 1,460 1,902 _ 3,362 504 3,866 Totals j384 4,623 6 021 2,450 13,094 ,, 1,596 i 14,690 * See Exhibit R p,...i ita, r.." "...,1 v." , roil " II ring pwri Emil. r)," v.." r', p.,,,a '. pool pin, POEN VW, Route Elgin North End Bridge COST ESTIMATE OF CCNSULTANT SERVICES (Environmental) , Project Bi: imi,- 14 e II es- • 4 - e e Phase 1.2, Section B - Environmental Se._...L4c2r.,,I FAU Project M-5172. Consultant H. W. Lochner, Inc. Date November 3, 1980 County Kane Joh No. . Estimated Cost in Dollars Number wernead of & In-House Net Fee* % of Item Man Payroll Fringe Direct Subtotal ' 3ervices Total Grand Hours Benefits Costs . , By Others Total (A) (B) (C) (D) JE) IF) _ ( ) ill) . in la awistin• Eco stens .Invt. Existing Land Use I .Invt. Existing Fac, Def. .Invt. Socio-Econo. Factors . .Compile Historic Resume , - . . .... .Sel. Feasible Alternative ..rnnduct Noise l' asurernent _ .. 1 .Perform Noise Analysis 0 0 0 800 800 0 800 0 .Conduct Air Quality Anlys, . , 0.DetermineCcrpreh.Impacts 1 Ident.Meas. to Min.Hann . - 0.Prepare Draft Statement t 3.Analvze Adverse Garments 40 536 699 50 4 1,285 _ 185 1,470 , , 14.Prepare Final Statement 180 2,091 L 2,723 4,000 8,814 722 9,536 I.5.Study A..1.tUae of 4(f)Land . • I6.Prepare 4(f) Statenent . 17,Prepare Neg,Declaration Totals 220 2,627 3,422 4,850 10,899 907 11,806 _ * See Exhibit R -- r, a f',.'.., ' 1 ,..—i .-i ,r--i , r_*1 ""." '""'"1 .,•"1 r'" l L _ Route Elgin North End Bridge EXHIBIT Q , Section Big Timber P.d t _D'u►dee Avenue COST ESTIMATE OF CONSULTANT'S SERVICES Project FAU Project M-5172 (16'0.5) Phase I.2, Section C - Public Participation • ' , County Kane ., Job No. Consultant H. W. LOCHNER, INC. Dote November 3, 1986 Estimated Cost in Dollars Number of Overhead In-House Net Fee* of ITEM Mon a Services Hours Payroll Fringe Direct Subtotal by Others TOTAL Grand Costs Total (A ) (B ) Be(Ci )s ( D ) (E ) ( F ) (G ) (H ) ( I ) I. Early Coordination 2. Group a Individual Meetings 3. Public Meetings 4. Public Hearings 180 2,527 3,292 750 6,569 873 7,442 5. Continued Coordination 80 1,344 1,751 350 3,445 464 3,909 6. Documentation 40 654 852 50 1,556 226 1,782 TOTALS 300 4,525 5.895 , 1,1 511 11,570 _ 1,563 13,133 * See Exhibit R fP,.hhr Pnrfirinnt inn PrnnrnmI r EXHIBIT R NET FEE AMOUNT ADDITIONAL STUDIES ELGIN NORTH END BRIDGE PROJECT C The amount shown for profit in Column F in "Summary, Cost Estimate of Consultant's Services," and expanded in Exhibits L through Q is a negotiated figure, based on a mutual agreement between the City of Elgin and H. W. Lochner, Inc. concerning the character of the project and factors surrounding the work to be undertaken. C In this project H. W. Lochner, Inc. will be undertaking a study for the development of a new bridge with new bridge approach roadways through a developed community, with divergent public viewpoints and complex physical constraints. This study will be a difficult one, with a substantial amount of careful guidance and senior staff participation needed. We also anticipate that there will be a considerable amount of judgment required as to the conduct of the studies and the public and agency participation efforts which will 16- need to be undertaken. Therefore, given the large scope of the project, and the complex character of the work which will be required, we anticipate a substantial amount of management follow-up and participation as the study progresses. It is based on all of these considerations that we have determined that the net fee figure of $19,594 is fully justified and indeed required. Accordingly, we have included that number in our proposal as a complement to the scope of work as negotiated with the City of Elgin.