Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01-177
Resolution No. 01-177 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A WATER QUALITY AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR THE BOWES CREEK ESTATES SUBDIVISION BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, that Joyce A. Parker, City Manager, be and is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Water Quality Amendment Application on behalf of the City of Elgin to the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission for an amendment to the Fox River Water Reclamation District Facilities Planning Area to include the Bowes Creek Estate Subdivision, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. s/ Ed Schack Ed Schack, Mayor Presented: June 27, 2001 Adopted: June 27, 2001 Omnibus Vote: Yeas : 7 Nays: 0 Recorded: Attest : s/ Dolonna Mecum Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS PLANNING COMMISSION 222 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 1800, Chicago, Illinois 60606 312/454-0400 Fax 312/454-0411 Water Quality Management Plan Amendment Application Completion of the attached application form is required for the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission to initiate its advisory water quality amendment review. Amendment requests for the construction of new, or the expansion of existing wastewater treatments facilities (including land treatment systems), require the completion of Sections A, B, D, E, and F. Amendment requests for the creation and/or modification of a facility planning area boundary require the completion of Sections A, C, D, E, and F. All required sections and questions must be answered by the applicant. Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant and will delay initiation of the Commission's advisory water quality amendment review. Information regarding water quality amendment requests that require a concomitant amendment of other Commission plans and policies (i.e., agricultural protection areas, population and household forecasts), and information on the Commission's review criteria can be found in "Water Quality Management Plan Amendment Process and Procedures" available from the Commission's offices. The completed amendment application should be submitted to: Water Resources Committee c /o Director: Project Review/Work Program Development Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission 222 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 1800, Chicago, Illinois 60606 Revised 2/96- Page 1 of 22 Section A : rfiniiia:01:0+61.144:1g0iiiiiiiidtettilirbilltpplittnt14seekinwaniendinent of thensigimiggi Illinois Water Quality Manogemght Planosiatammigammeng .::..:::.N::pw:i:i-:meig:ngzunmmitamgggttgkgrzttmsgegsa000rgaggiss-immmgommgmalloogmonRammomg$L This amendment request is filed pursuant to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's Procedures and Requirements in effect at this time for revising water quality management plans. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application, and to the best of by knowledge, such information is true, complete, and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to request and submit an amendment petition. Joyce A. Parker )‹ gf,e(iatA—d Printed Name of Petitioner Signature of Petitioner City of Elgin Date L.(„„q.1. „2 ad 1 .".".... - „,-, .-,.."....•• .....-.- ,,,. .:....;.Has,:the.'eleot00 -hciar#:::Oti.-ttik applicant• :• .. ....• formally endorsed the submittal entation of Yes x If yes, • • • •„:...... • action ..... NOihdiOete.,:Wheff'bderdeOtiOhl -. ....... ....... .... ..... ....... .„..„ •• • .„ „:: -.:" : -:• :;.„..--2, .• • : . „ .„. . Revised 2/96- Page 2 of 22 OF City of Elgin Agenda Item No. tisk ), 111,5 ,60 E t!! I- 1 ' 010 G 1:11: ' I. al Ili L June 8 , 2001 I ri P1 Uf; II in N Fim 14 . .di ' INAL TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FINANCIALLY STABLE CIT YGOVEFINMENT EFFICIENT SERVICES. AND QUALITY INFRASTRUCTURE FROM: Joyce A. Parker, City Manager SUBJECT: Bowes Creek Estates - Facilities Planning Area Amendment PURPOSE The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the Mayor and members of the City Council with information to consider an amendment to the Fox River Water Reclamation District (FRWRD) Facilities Planning Area (FPA) to include property known as the Bowes Creek Estates Subdivision. (1114. BACKGROUND As the City Council is aware, there are several additional City actions needed to ensure the successful completion of the Bowes Creek Estates Subdivision. This memorandum outlines the materials that would allow the expansion of FRWRD' s existing FPA westerly to include this proposed subdivision' s 608 acres (see map) . An FPA is a geographic area in which developments and their wastewater treatment facilities and sanitary sewers are monitored for proper water quality management and other environmental practices . Amendments to an FPA are necessary to allow for the proper environmental review and monitoring of any additional properties . The Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission is the reviewing agency who performs this task on behalf of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for this part of Illinois . The attached draft application concludes that the project will allow for the logical and orderly expansion of Elgin' s westerly growth and will not be detrimental to the area' s water quality environment . ea. r Bowes Creek Estates - Facilities Planning Area Amendment June 8 , 2001 Page 2 COMMUNITY GROUPS/INTERESTED PERSONS CONTACTED FRWRD has been notified of this action and has communicated support for this proposal . If approved by the City Council, the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission will formally seek input and comment from FRWRD as part of their review and approval process . E-, FINANCIAL IMPACT The developer will bear all of the costs associated with the processing of this request . TW/1EGAL IMPACT v\ A resolution will need to be prepared authorizing the City Manager to file this application. ALTERNATIVES few 1 . Approve the application as a part of the overall approval process for the Bowes Creek Subdivision. 2 . Do not approve the application. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Mayor an City Council approve this application for the FPA amendment . Respectfully submitted, J )_/)1A1 _ cQ, ce A. Parker City Manager JAP/mtb r COWHEY GUDMUNDSON LEDER, LTD. CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • NATURAL RESOURCES ROBERT E COWHEY,P E ROBERT W GUDMUNDSON,PB PAUL D LEDER,P E RANDALL A.DRUECK,P F File #2133.3-200 JAMES E KOEHLER }TIMERS I LOFTUS,IR PB LEE R.KOEHLER,P L S ROBERT E.COWHEY,HI May 4, 2001 DONNA L DELBRIDGE,PB GARY L HOERTH,P E ROGER S LOCKWOOD,P E IRMA TERRY Mr. Mark Biernacki DWIGHT A TROSTLE,PB Director of Community Development City of Elgin 150 Dexter Court Elgin, IL 60120-5555 Re: FPA Amendment Application Bowes Creek Estates Property Elgin, Illinois Dear Mark: Pursuant to our recent conversation, we are forwarding to you three (3) complete jek copies of the Water Quality Amendment Application for the Bowes Creek area. You will note that the request must be signed by the Petitioner on page 2 where indicated. It is our understanding that your city Manager, Joyce Parker, will be your agent and contact person for NIPC. We are also enclosing copies of appropriate exhibits and attachments to assist NIPC in their evaluation of this request. Reference is made to your Far West Area Plan and Guidelines along with the City of Elgin Stormwater Management Ordinance. Copies of these two documents will be sent to NIPC with the completed application. Page 2 of the application also refers to a resolution or documentation of an action for approval by the City Council for this request. As an alternative, it could be indicated as a tentative date as to when this action would take place. If this request form is satisfactory after you review, please return two (2) signed copies to our office in order that we can provide additional materials for a complete submission to NIPC. It is our intention to deliver this application to their office by May 14, 2001 in order to make their agenda for a hearing on June 28, 2001. FACAD13\2133.30\200Ttr0503_Biernacki_FPA.DOC Page 1 300 PARK BOULEVARD, ITASCA,ILLINOIS 60143 • PHONE:(630)250-9595 • FAX:(630)250-9644 EMAIL:INFO@CGL-LTD.COM • Website HTTP://WWW.CGL-LTD.COM If you have any questions or need additional information or assistance, please feel free to contact our office. If I am not available, Hubert Loftus or Michele Bellock should be able to help you. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, CO WHEY GUDMUNDSON LEDER, LTD. Robert E. Cowhey Encl. Xc: Greg Hergenroeder—FRWRD w/attachments Peter Bazos— Schnell, Bazos, Freeman, and Kramer w/attachments Hubert J. Loftus—w/o attachments r eft. F:\CADD12133.30\200\Ltr0503_Biernacki_FPA.DOC Page 2 300 PARK BOULEVARD, ITASCA,ILLINOIS 60143 • PHONE:(630)250-9595 • FAX:(630)250-9644 • EMAIL: INFOaCGL-LTD.COM • NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS PLANNING COMMISSION 222 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 1800, Chicago, Illinois 60606 312/454-0400 Fax 312/454-0411 Water Quality Management Plan Amendment Application Completion of the attached application form is required for the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission to initiate its advisory water quality amendment review. Amendment requests for the construction of new, or the expansion of existing wastewater treatments facilities (including land treatment systems), require the completion of Sections A, B, D, E, and F. Amendment requests for the creation and/or modification of a facility planning area boundary require the completion of Sections A, C, D, E, and F. All required sections and questions must be answered by the applicant. Incomplete applications will be returned to the applicant and will delay initiation of the Commission's advisory water quality amendment review. Information regarding water quality amendment requests that require a concomitant amendment of other Commission plans and policies (i.e., agricultural protection areas, population and household forecasts), and information on the Commission's review criteria can be found in "Water Quality Management Plan Amendment Process and Procedures" available from the Commission's offices. The completed amendment application should be submitted to: Water Resources Committee c /o Director: Project Review/Work Program Development Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission 222 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 1800, Chicago, Illinois 60606 Revised 2/96- Page 1 of 22 To be completed byallapplicants seeking amendment of theaggf$0:-; II.IIIIIIIIJIIIEzerntlq:tiiwoyggqmgooaizgufo#Agomo#voo:itxggomgfamsgomesa ...• • This amendment request is filed pursuant to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency's Procedures and Requirements in effect at this time for revising water quality management plans. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the application, and to the best of by knowledge, such information is true, complete, and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to request and submit an amendment petition. Printed Name of Petitioner Signature of Petitioner City of Elgin Date • . ,•:••••....• ••• • . •. HOs.th0:'eteCI00:0:66'td!Oti •.... ,„....• ... ..„.•..•.......... „..••••-..• .•••• •..„„• „.„ •• • • • •••• •••.•• „ • ••"• „ •.„• ..„.. „ •• • .„._ ..•.. of this7"Water.::clUalitV...:00.ietiOrrie0tapplication . Yes ............................ :.,..:.• ...• ... please ..• ..:.....attach resolution,• minutes or • action .. . . No If answer is no, please indicate when board action is scheduled to • „ occur. •-- .. . -•• .,: • .. . • .. .„.• • • , .• .•:...„ ... : • .. -... •.-...•. ..... -.E: .• : •:• : • •. :.„.„ , . • ..:. • ..•... . „ „ . „. .• „ . ..... ..... „. . .„ ..• „ . „„ .. • ••. . . „ •• „ . . „.. . . • ... • • .• • Revised 2/96- Page 2 of 22 Petitioner's Authorized Agent & Contact Person: Name Joyce A. Parker Title City Manager Entity City of Elgin Address 150 Dexter Court City Elgin State TT. Zipcode 60120 Phone (847 ) 931-5590 Fax (847 ) 931-5510 Type Amendment Requested (Check all that apply) New Treatment Facility/Discharge FPA Boundary Change Expanded Plant Capacity FPA Creation Dissolution of FPA Land Treatment System rik FPA Name Change Plant Phase Out Other Identify all facility planning areas within 11/2 miles of requested amendment area and/or applicant's facility planning area. Fox River Water Reclamation District (FRWRD) • Revised 2/96- Page 3 of 22 Section B rilliglifol#0•1§*gitgtg011m-pjfir‘trig-040gpvtog000rogitivoivinoillhilproposed construction of a new wastewater or land treatment lusn tistiltogigtywovzoe#AfakfitittlteOnitcdlidtfittiifggi.:ttarda14gttaaIIII gtreatmentfacility. gSanggggggnggni.!,:4gMM:Ggagnngai.ii':gggnNii.EgaingnianggNa.M.M.agginggEEM.MSBMMaagnatniti NOT APPLICABLE 1. Provide a summary of and need for the requested amendment. NOTE: Any amendment application involving 1) a substantial change in a facility planning area, 100 or more acres, and/or 2) a new or expanded treatment facility, involving a capacity increase of 0.25 mgd or 10 percent, should be accompanied by a up-to-date facility plan. r 2. Facility Information Name: Ownership: Public Private Other Owner(s) Name: Operator: Location: City/Township/County: 3. Treatment Processes A. Describe the wastewater treatment processes to be used. (964. Revised 2/96- Page 4 of 22 A449 B. For discharges to high quality and/or low flow waterbodies. Will the facility incorporate design components which maximize treatment reliability, including process units in parallel which provide treatment redundancy in the event of main system malfunction or failure; effluent polishing lagoons incorporating wetland vegetation; and, a preference for high-reliability technologies? Please describe. 4. Treatment Capacities Design Flows: Design Year for proposed flows. Average Daily Flow Current mgd Proposed mgd Maximum Daily Flow Current mgd Proposed mgd Actual Flows (based on most recent annual experience): Year Measured average daily flow: mgd Flow Components * a. Average Sanitary mgd b. Average Infiltration mgd c. Average Inflow mgd (* a +b +c = average daily flow) 5. Receiving Waters Name and location: Type: Stream Lake Well Injection Other If other, describe: Estimation of average annual upstream flow and 7-day 10-year low flow of identified receiving stream: cfs Information Source: Revised 2/96- Page 5 of 22 6. Discharge Location: Not Applicable Latitude: Degrees Minutes Seconds Longitude: Degrees Minutes Seconds 7. Area to Be Served: Provide a map of the existing and proposed service area for the new/expanded treatment facility at a scale of 1 inch = 2,000 feet. Existing Service area: Total acres Population Households Total PE Proposed Service Area: Total acres Population Households Total PE By Year: (NOTE: The proposed amendment must not exceed the population projections for the twenty-year planning period set forth in the currently approved facility plan or the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission's twenty year forecasts for the facility planning area. The Commission may agree to adjustments within the regional forecast total.) 8. Development(s) to be Served: Describe all anticipated development that will be served by the new and/or expanded treatment facility. (For each development, provide the following information: project name, developer name, number and mix of units for residential developments, and total acreage. For non-residential development provide expected number of employees. Please indicate project status (i.e., planned, annexed, zoned, under construction, construction completed, etc.) Attach additional sheets as needed. Revised 2/96- Page 6 of 22 9. Permits/Variances NPDES Number: (Attach Copy) NPDES Permit Applied for: No Yes Date Applied for: Land Application Construction Permit Number: (Attach Copy) Land Application Permit Applied For: No Yes Date Applied for: Has or will a variance from IEPA/IPCB Standards be required for the operation of the proposed facility? No Yes If yes, describe: 10. If proposal is for a privately owned and operated facility, describe the type, size, location and distance to nearest existing publicly owned wastewater sewer and treatment facility. 11. Provide the following information regarding the anticipated costs for the proposed facility modification/creation. Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge Handling Facilities Pump Stations Interceptor Sewers Collection Sewers On-site and Alternative Systems Land Acquisition Inspection/Construction Management $ Project Management/Design Other Estimated Total Construction Cost: Revised 2/96- Page 7 of 22 Ai, 4 . 12. Provide an estimate of annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs for the proposed facility modification/creation. Labor Utilities Materials Outside Services Equipment Replacement Miscellaneous Total Estimated Annual 0,M & R Costs 13. Uniform Annual Equivalent Cost: 14. Describe how the proposed facility modification/creation will be financed. ego- Local Developer Contribution IEPA Revolving Loan General Obligation Bond Revenue Bond Special Taxing District User Charges/Fees Private Utility-Capital Funds Other IEPA Funding Other State Funding Other Grants/Loans/Fees $ $ Total Anticipated Financing Revised 2/96- Page 8 of 22 /V. A— 15. Describe any and all service alternatives which were examined including land treatment to the requested amendment. 1 Attach additional sheets as needed. 16. How was cost effectiveness of the selected alternative determined? Attach additional sheets as needed). 1. Anticipated environmental impacts associated with each alternative should also be presented for water quality (surface and groundwater), wetlands, floodplains, prime agricultural lands, fish and wildlife, and endangered and threatened species. Options for alternative discharge locations (e.g., to receiving waters with greater dilution rations) should also be discussed. Revised 2/96- Page 9 of 22 AZ /0• • • Section C lietalWtaiifikNktf6EMIifiiifidiMitlfbitfRRIAOkifdltkig.so,titooiooiiitt PIOSI!Ing100701101101411411.11111111#1111.1rlioggfral" 1. Provide a summary of and need for the requested amendment. NOTE: Any amendment application involving 1) a substantial change in a facility planning area, 100 or more acres, and or 2) a new or expanded treatment facility, involving a capacity increase of 0.25 mgd or 10 percent, should be accompanied by a up-to-date facility plan. The subject property is intended for developm-at as .a residential / rprrpafinnnl planned development within the corporate limits of the City of Elgin. At present, the entire 608.0 acres is in a non-FPA area. As part of the orderly expansion of the City of Elgin and the proposed new improvements by FRWRD and the City, this entire property would be served by their combined systems. All of this site would be within the expanded limits of the FRWRD FPA. (Exhibits A & B) 2. Geophysical Information Provide the following information regarding the amendment area. a. Size: 608.0 Acres Requested Amendment Area (In acres) Attach a black-and-white map that clearly delineates the existing facility planning area and the amendment area at a scale of 1 " = 2000' (Exhibit C) b. Location: County Kane Township(s) Plato Township (41N) Section(s) portions of sections 25 & 26 c. A legal description of the existing facility planning area must be included. (See existing FPA boundary map exhibit) (Exhibit C) d. A legal description of the area requested must also be included. ( Exhibits D & E) Revised 2/96- Page 10 of 22 3. Current FPA Status Is amendment area currently part of an existing facility planning area? No x Yes If yes, provide the name(s) of the FPA(s). 4. Population and Household Forecasts Provide an assessment of existing and proposed population of the requested area, and resultant wasteloads and wastewater flows. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING Forecasted INFORMATION FOR THE REQUESTED Current AMENDMENT AREA Number By year? Population N/A 2,74 4 2010 Number of Households N/A 774 2010 Residential Population Equivalent (PE) NIA 2.709 Employment - Golf Course N/A 140 2006 Employment Population Equivalent (PE) N/A 35 2006 Total Population Equivalent (PE) N/A 2,744 2010 Daily Average astewa er Flow Domestic None 274 ,400 GPD 2010 Industrial NnriP None Total None 274 ,400 GPD 2010 NOTE: The proposed amendment must not exceed the population projections for the twenty-year planning period set forth in the currently approved facility plan or the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission's twenty-year forecasts for the facility planning area. The Commission may agree to adjustments within the regional forecast total. 5. Amendment Area Land Uses a. Current Zoning of Amendment Area: Single Family & Multi-Family Residential w/Planned Community Facility (Golf) b. Date Zoning Received: February 28, 2001 c. Zoning Body: City of Fl gin Revised 2/96- Page 1 1 of 22 d. Development(s) Describe current and proposed land use of the amendment area including, if available, project name, developer name, number and mix of units for residential developments, and total acreage. For non-residential development provide expected number of employees. Please indicate project status (i.e., planned, annexed, zoned, under construction, construction completed, etc.). Attach additional sheets as needed. The entire property will be developed as a residential-Rolf course community within the City of Elgin. The overall development will be handled by NBC LLC, a real estate partnership. The finished community will be comprised of approximately 634 single family units, 140 townhouse units and a public Rolf course and swim club. (See Exhibit F) 6. Wastewater Treatment a. Describe and map any existing wastewater sewer/interceptor and/or treatment facility located within or adjacent to the subject amendment area. Attach additional sheets as needed. We will connect our system to a proposed sanitary sewer interceptor sewer which will be part of a City of Elgin expansion including a major lift station (Otter Creek Life Station) and a force main to existing_facilities east of Randall Road. All are tributary to the main FRWRD treatment plant. The lift station and forcemain is presently under design by the City of Elgin and its consultant's. It is anticipated that construction will start later this year b. How will wastewater services be provided to/connected to the subject amendment area? Include map showing route of interceptors & sewers, pump stations or gravity flow, treatment plant, etc. Attach additional sheets as needed. Bowes Creek will be fully served with sanitary sewer and connect by a lift station and a force main to the offsite system described above (See attached exhibits) Revised 2/96- Page 12 of 22 7. Alternatives - Describe wastewater service alternatives examined. (Attach f additional sheets as needed.) 2 None for this size of development. The City of Elgin and FllJRD have been very cooperative in working out appropriate service solutions. This property is part of the City of Elgin. For West Area Plan area and as such it will be part of a com.rehensive •ro:ram b the Cit and FRWRD to extend sanitar - - . . . -st of Randall Road. We are working with other major developers to provide necessary capital, easements and right-of-ways to construct the new system. 8. Document the cost effectiveness of the wastewater alternatives identified in Number 7 above. Provide a side by side analysis with the selected alternative highlighted. (Describe costs for all relevant system components including, but not limited to, sewers and interceptors, pumping stations, and treatment facilities.) (Attach additional sheets as needed.) Onsite gravity sewer system = $2,840,000 Onsite lift station & forcemain = 800,000 subtotal $3,640,000 Offsite interceptor = $2,700,000 subtotal $6,340,000 Engineering & contingency @ 20% = $1,268,000 Total Estimated Cost = $7,608,000 2. Anticipated environmental impacts associated with each alternative should also be presented for water quality (surface and groundwater), wetlands, floodplains, prime agricultural lands, fish and wildlife, and endangered and threatened species. Options for alternative discharge locations (e.g., to receiving waters with greater dilution rations) should also be discussed. Revised 2/96- Page 13 of 22 9. How much will provision of wastewater service to the subject amendment area cost? Treatment Facilities $ N/A Pumping Stations (Otter Creek) $ 3,400,000 (est.) Interceptor Sewers (Forcemain) $ 1,000,000 (est.) Collection Sewers $ N/A Land Acquisition $ N/A Inspection/Construction Management $ 120,000 (est.) Project Management/Design $ 180,000 (est.) Operation & Maintenance $ 50.000 / year Other $ Other $ Estimated Total Cost to provide service: $ Uniform Annual Equivalent Cost: $ Additional Comments: 10. What will be the per household user costs? Connection Fee $ per City of Elgin Monthly Service Fee $ per City of Elgin Other $ Other $ Other $ Estimated Total Per Household Monthly Cost $ T_R_n_ Additional Comments: Revised 2/96- Page 14 of 22 ...:..:...:.:............ .::::::>:: ..................::::::.......:::.::.:;;.:: otiiiivoisminorsininommitimm 1. Provide the following information regarding the environmental characteristics of the subject amendment area. a. Surface Waterbodies (streams, lakes): Attach Map x None Exhibit K b. Wetlands: Map Attached x Not Applicable (none) _ (If applicable, attach map at scale of 1 inch - 2,000 feet, giving size and location of any identified wetlands located in or immediately adjacent to subject amendment area.) Exbibits L-1 & L-2 c. Floodplains: Map Attached x Not Applicable (none) _ (If applicable, attach map at scale of 1 inch - 2,000 feet, giving size and location of all IDOT/DRW - Federal Emergency Management Agency regulatory floodplains located in or immediately adjacent to subject amendment area. Exhibit M d. Other: Map Attached Not Applicable (none) x (If applicable, attach map at scale of 1 inch = 2,000 feet identifying any aquifer, groundwater recharge area and/or state designated natural area located on or immediately adjacent to subject amendment area. 2. Will amendment include, require, or result in modification (i.e., filling, dredging, channelization, disposal, or similar activity) of any lake, stream, wetland, or floodplain area? No Yes x (If yes, describe: The development has been carefully planned for maximum avoidance of wetlands and sensitive areas and to enhancing critical wetland areas. For the entire development, a total impact area is 1.87 acres or 7% of the total wetland area of 27.75. Of 11.26 acres of Waters of the U.S. , a total increase of 0.25 or 2% will be impacted. Mitigation will include 3.2 acres of wetland creation and 1.53 acres of waters. Large areas of open space and buffer zones will be preserved or created throughout the development. Revised 2/96- Page 15 of 22 Section rialliallf46001MititiviAtoolliNogobitg sotommodopmenummonsom... ::>::>::<:><:: ::»::::>::>::»:>::>...................... . :.:. >:;> >:> 1::;ar�a. dman:�.�. . ue. �. . ............... .:..:.. ...............:.. :::.�:::::::.::::::::::::..........:<:::::.::::..:To.:��.::ec}.m :feted.:�c�:r..::�1�..:...............:r�.:.�:::::.�::::::::t.:::�.:..:::.:..:::.:...:..:.:..:.............:.::....::.::.::..:............... ,>.;ii.';:::::::i:��<.:Y:ii:i:::iiii' , : ":'::::::ii::i:i' pob ective: :::: -ith >i:>::>::> >:.;>::..:. .. �- c. .»w�tJt:::tbe.::xiota orrtt;source.:�n.ana. eme:rat ::flee}es;an....::.....J.....:...:.::....s..:o..::�.:.e:::.:::::: :3o.:ensur.:e..���.s��t�n.... .....:...:.:.:: : .:::..:: ::::P.:: �.: . :.::::::,. :::.:::.:....g.:.......::::#�:::::::::.::::.: ::::::::::: ::.: :::_::::.::::.:::.:::::::::,.:::. 45 :>::<�:<:>::;:>::::<:>::..,::::>:<:>:<;•::<::<�>::::><:<:«<;>::•:>:::;:.>::�:.:;:»:::..:.:.: :. . s onrecommt<:><nd> <•ota>::•::>aki. ..#fin otfl: rdnaracos o>:>rfogulare.:.�s< y.::.:.:h<pr.:.od:.�ef: w;:aer _> ; :: yhi >«:cmar ie>toteoh ecivg*.snd::$tndard .oteofain :DIFF ::.»..�..:::.> :. ::Mode.l:>:Stormwater Draina a and Detentiox:<Ordinarnce:>{as::amended JuJ ode1:>ordtnsncas..::1..1!.�...................................................................g.::::.:::::::::.....................................................:...................:.........................�....... 99:1::::;:3.::>Model>:: rod::f'te#ti:<>i::;:<: ..............�#..:.:):::::::::::.::::::::.::.:..:.:....:.....:::::::::::::.:::::. :.:.:...,... .::... ,..: .. ... ::;Proteotcon:::Or:dinance:::or€:the:Cre:atior ::of•a: ._:. ::::;:>� 89.:.and»..4:.;>:Modei:>�t�ear�:>and::: ��ta�t�::.:.............................................:....:�::.::::::::::.:::.::::::.::::::.�:: .:...�:::::::::::::::: t . >:: :>:ollowin :::cheoklast:> rovrd.es< :uidance:to:><:;::: >::::::.:•:-.. n >:-< . :; : rtc- ::>:l�:ver`.a ...i��strr�t:::.::�>98:1�:�:;:i:The.:f.................. ............................�..................... ..................................:. a k r:o�risroe!$g tf:::standarolyyt ok h gcgO lsgr....:.:.::.:..:pg.0: ..nti..:::::::: '::<::=: .:....,.giants>:r::e :artl3:- ::::a:� .ort...nt.: ......:.:.....:........:.�..................................:.:::::::.:�:.:.::::::.:::::.�.:::.:...............................................:,....:............... i :. nc >.>:'t>.-;::a in:;: >: r 0ting>:of a �ro ..rate::;ordinaancei>tan�va a >:<::::»::::: <<>::::>:<>::1` r>:r:oJusj. .:::>:rn;>l•aca�:ivr�.ria. s.....:.::.Q...:�cf..:..::'k.#,�e.:d::��.:..:.. ............ ..�..... ...............::::::::.::.:::::..::::::..�:::g::._..:g.::.,::.:.�:::.:: :: >si a ei`:listed in parent eses i;<>»'> ':::::::::``i�::>:: : ;i;•:;k;::.':::;::}:.:<ii:;:�: ::;;:;::;:::;::: :;:::;:.:::i:::;.i:::i:::i i;:•::• ::•::. ::..:;x:::;::::•.,:::;::::;::::;�:•:::::.;. ;.,;,;.;.......::.:... ..,......:...:: ;:.:..... .. :....:> . ... ..>: � ->: - :: :::: .. . a:>: r.: .inar�ce .. r. ... ....:::.: merided:sect�on�;::fr..crm::;the:::::r..:eTewa :Nf#�C.rnod....::�a-,.....:.:::::.:�::.:....:::::::::._::::..:.:.::.:.:...:..:P:.:::..:.:::...:::....:.:..:..:;:..:.;::.: 1. Stormwater Management a. Is the amendment area and/or facility planning area subject to a municipal and/or county stormwater drainage and detention ordinance? Yes x No Unknown If yes, give name(s) of municipality(s) or county(s), attach copy. City of Elgin Stormwater & Detention Ordinance b. Does the applicable stormwater management ordinance: • Include control of runoff volume, rate, and quality in the purpose statement? (Section 100.0) Yes x No • Promote the use of natural drainage practices (e.g., swales, filter strips, infiltration devices, and natural depressions over storm sewers to minimize runoff volumes and enhance pollutant filtering? (Sections 500.0 and 71 1) Yes x No • Require that peak post-development discharge from events less than or equal to the two-year, 24-hour event be limited to 0.04 cfs per acre of watershed? (Section 701 .0) Yes x No If no, what does it require for storms smaller than the 100-year event? Revised 2/96- Page 16 of 22 ■ Require detention design standards which maximize water quality '" mitigation benefits, with a preference for wet bottom and/or wetland basins over dry basins? (Sections 600.0, 705, and 706) Yes X No ■ Prohibit detention in the floodway? (Section 708.2) Yes No x ■ Prohibit on-stream detention, unless it provides regional stormwater storage and is accompanied by other water quality BMPs upstream? (Section 708.3) Yes X No ■ Prohibit the direct discharge of undetained stormwater into wetlands? (Section 709) Yes X No ■ Require formal maintenance contracts for new detention facilities? (Sections 713.0 and 1100.0) Yes No X (Golf course ownership & homeowners Assoc.) 2. Soil Erosion and Sediment Control a. Is the affected area/facility planning area subject to a municipal and/or county soil erosion and sediment control ordinance? Yes x No Unknown If yes, give name(s) of municipality(s) or county(s) and attach copy. City of Elgin b. Does the applicable soil erosion and sediment control ordinance: ■ Include a comprehensive purpose statement which limits sediment delivery, as close as practicable, to pre-disturbance levels and minimizes effects on water quality, flooding, and nuisances? (Section 100) Yes .x No ■ Include a comprehensive set of principles which minimize sediment transport from the site for all storms up to the ten-year frequency event? Yes X No (These principles should include provisions to minimize the area disturbed and the time of disturbance, follow natural contours, avoid sensitive areas, require that sediment control measures be in place as part of land development process before significant grading or disturbance is allowed, and require the early implementation of soil stabilization measures on disturbed areas -- Section 300). Revised 2/96- Page 17 of 22 ■ Require ordinance applicability for any land disturbing activity in excess of 5,000 square feet, or 500 square feet if adjacent to stream, lake, or wetland? (Section 400) Yes x No Other (Describe) • Include explicit site design requirements for sediment control measures, conveyance channels, soil stabilization, construction adjacent to waterbodies, construction entrances, etc.? (Section 503) Yes x No — ■ Adopt by reference the "Illinois Urban Manual" published by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency in 1995 and the "Illinois Procedures and Standards for Urban Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control" published in 1988 (the Greenbook)? (Section 504) Yes x No • Require routine maintenance of all erosion and sediment control practices? (Section 505) Yes x No • Require inspection by appropriately trained personnel of construction sites at critical points in the development process to ensure that measures are being correctly installed and maintained? (Section 506) Yes X No • Provide effective enforcement mechanisms including performance bonds, stop-work orders, and penalties, as appropriate? (Sections 405, 602, and 603) Yes x No 3. Floodplain Management a. Is the affected area/facility planning area subject to a municipal and/or county floodplain management ordinance? Yes x No Unknown If yes, give name(s) of municipality(s) or county(s) and attach copy. City of Elgin b. Does the applicable floodplain management ordinance: • Include protection of hydrologic functions, water quality, aquatic habitat, recreation, and aesthetics in the purposes for the ordinance? (Section 200) Yes X No iek Revised 2/96- Page 18 of 22 • Restrict modifications in the floodway to the following appropriate uses: public flood control projects, public recreation and open space uses, water dependent activities, and crossing roadways and bridges? Yes jr,. No _ (The ordinance should thereby prohibit new treatment plants and pumping facilities; detached garages, sheds, and other non-habitable structures; parking lots and aircraft parking aprons; and roadways which run longitudinally along a watercourse.) (Section 802.0) • Discourage stream channel modification and require mitigation of unavoidable adverse water quality and aquatic habitat impacts? (Sections • 801 .1 .q and 802.1.i) Yes x No • Discourage onstream impoundments unless public interest and environmental mitigation criteria are met? (Section 802.1 .f) Yes x No ■ Require effective soil erosion and sediment control measures for all disturbances in the floodway? (Section 802.1 .k) Yes x No ■ Require protection of a minimum 25 foot native vegetation buffer along the channel? (Section 802.1 .p) Yes x No 4. Stream and Wetland Protection a. Is the affected area/facility planning area subject to a municipal and/or county stream and wetland protection ordinance? Yes x No Unknown If yes, give name(s) of municipality(s) or county(s) and attach copy. City of Elgin - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers criteria b. Does the applicable stream and wetland protection ordinance: ■ Include a comprehensive purpose statement which addresses the protection of hydrologic and hydraulic, water quality, habitat, aesthetic, and social and economic values and functions of wetlands? (Section 3.00) Yes x No ■ Protect the beneficial functions of streams, lakes, and wetlands from damaging modifications, including filling, draining, excavating, damming, impoundment, and vegetation removal? (Sections 6.03 and 4.00.h - (.6' "development") Yes x No Revised 2/96- Page 19 of 22 ■ Prohibit the modification of high quality, irreplaceable wetlands, lakes, and stream corridors? Yes x No ■ Discourage the modification of wetlands for stormwater management purposes unless the wetland is severely degraded and nonpoint source BMPs are implemented on the adjacent development? (Section 6.03) Yes x No ■ Designate a minimum 75 foot setback zone from the edge of identified wetlands and water bodies in which development is limited to the following types of activities: minor improvements like walkways and signs, maintenance of highways and utilities, and park and recreational area development? (Section 6.03) Yes No X _ ■ Establish a minimum 25-foot wide protected native vegetation buffer strip along the edge of identified wetlands and waterbodies. (Section 6.08) Yes x No ■ Prohibit watercourse relocation or modification except to remedy existing erosion problems, restore natural conditions, or to accommodate rik necessary utility crossings; and require mitigation of unavoidable adverse water quality and aquatic habitat impacts? (Sections 7.00, 7.01 , and 7.02) Yes X No ■ Discourage the armoring of channels and banks unless natural vegetation and gradual bank sloping are inadequate to prevent severe erosion? (Section 7.03) Yes x No _ ■ Discourage culvert crossings of streams unless necessary for allowing access to a property? (Section 7.04) Yes x No ■ Discourage onstream impoundments unless public interest and environmental mitigation criteria are met? (Section 7.05) Yes x No ■ Require adequate mitigation measures for approved wetland and waterbody modifications, including 1 .5 to 1 acreage replacement for destroyed wetlands, maintenance and monitoring for at least 5 years, and full restoration of natural wetland or waterbody functions? Yes X No — Revised 2/96- Page 20 of 22 . . • • . .• Section F • Criteria for Facility. Amendments to the Areawide Water Quality NOMMEMENNOMM04640010:ntWortifforNolttoo$xertillignoi4nommenannew mitemigno:;1.4.ipingspapApi:,:epotopeAggiiilipoppotimpommi:pippriiimimmisiimemploic:mmiiRmi! leTt)*AtAftitOmitmiAolp#PIAVANAgotiiNgtotiiitiggRWIPIMAILMitOt consideration ofamendment requests are based on the ' Recommended Criteria for Facilities Amendments to the Areawide Water Quality Management Plan for Northeastern IIIIII:iffg4gijitii‘740%P:Ptqigi4Otrk*t!-P8ttooiVitfqo::NokftahAoggti#0.!$#ONggqCillIll11. 11111111111NOwiingq#§p#MFINAcWitttOgi!tpt.i,EAnv mtp#110pgraY,A)74#FrOigtOpm1four conditions also of concern to the Commission 111111111111111111, giefigliglikrOgootgiip-m9f9.04:::iAWPM*1#11Y4400MROPIPPMPOPri,PriPTinghlightany portion of their amendment application that relates to these criteria.. tinginis 1 . Any proposed facility amendment must be designed to meet State of Illinois water quality standards for the receiving waters and the appropriate discharge standards, or must receive a variance from the Illinois Pollution Control Board. 2. The population and employment for which the proposed amendment is designed must fall within the twenty-year forecasts for the facility planning area most risk recently adopted by the Commission, or the Commission may agree to adjustments within the regional forecast total. 3. The applicant must demonstrate that the unit of local government granting zoning to the project has formally accepted financial responsibility for the wastewater treatment system in event of system malfunction or failure. Such acceptance must be in the form of a resolution from the unit of local government granting zoning. 4. The proposed amendment should not reduce the effectiveness of the water quality improvement strategy contained in the original plan, for either point or nonpoint source control. 5. The proposed amendment should not adversely affect the cost effectiveness of the Areawide Water Quality Management Plan for meeting water quality standards in the facility planning area as a whole. 6. The proposed amendment should have the endorsement of the designated management agency for wastewater treatment and substantial support by the municipalities within the affected facility planning area. 7. The proposed amendment should not adversely affect adjoining units of government. Revised 2/96- Page 21 of 22 8. The proposed amendment should be consistent with other county and regional plans or state policies, such as the preservation of agricultural land. (If the er- proposal would require the amendment of another regional plan, the Commission will consider the wisdom of that amendment at the same time.) 9. Consideration will be given to evidence of municipal or county zoning approval and commencement of development activity prior to Areawide Water Quality Management Plan adoption in January, 1979. RESPONSES FOR SECTION "F": 1. The proposed amendment will provide for sanitary sewer discharge to the existing FRWRD sewage treatment int via existing intprsPps-or Rewers in the city of F1gin and proposed Otter Creek lift station and forcemain constructed under the control of the City of Elgin. 2. We believe that the population forecast for the subject property to be accurate and within the 20 year forecast for the FPA. 3. Not applicable - sewage treatment by FRWRD. 4. By expansion of an existing FPA (FRWRD) , the property will be serviced without any impacts tothe water quality improvement strategy contained in the present plan. 5. Annexation and user fees paid to FRWRD and the City of Elgin will meet anticipated costs for the expansion of the area wide program. 6. The City of Elgin and the FRWRD support this FPA amendment through their approval and acknowledgement of this petition. 7. The proposed amendment is consistent with the far west area plan of the City (copy of Elgin and the proposed expansion of facilities by the City and FRWRD. attached) 8. The proposed amendment is consistent with County wide plans for the area. 9. No development activity or construction has commenced on the site as of this date. Preliminary plan approval has been granted by the City of Elgin. r Revised 2/96- Page 22 of 22 vim rk al' 1.. . : . 5411:il" . '"1"'111111111' 'a c.-1.......:::;1: :N 117.:441Wies • � 6 •f gi Q � r mC �� & HA aj ir• _, . ••oE ,, ii n. `f n ,'�� `J L,[ ,Ns 3141;V n `F?1HMU8' Oil \ RT Mi a 1,L.iu�g l/. �� ( �1 Las/ic Ft ea `.• y>• it (J1.1. 1 lid ur rus r 41� He/en - • /• A C. urke -o ;-7,‘� '6 .p ©474 i m b oug 9 F111`,t(;, ` co , R;zap -3 ca t r/� •MQ tf dwviaC� o . i� FronkG / ! ��wa b0 C c' �w ��� . oh . ` 'r Inr• 1� N �.1 m 'ITi i'.3 .. ~ X30 BO gifa b Z I n ^. '. kim.il,... 1 N kG, Z,; Cu (.), 0 I rii.„-salit MI • .X4° A CD ' •• 10 •. ;;. f --.' N.'}(0,* •-i. I,imago ...•galI tea=' irot .f ' ' m� P m,•' / '� N. t� ,: , . 1 IN '-- -` 1;55- • WvININ : )110 Q • -.A :a0- , . lest ot trust r• �0O "� pi4 nuor:m O JJlei� . • fn l (� lt,� o �+.�!•�.,./�s�J�4 3 • .. 1;;� ■ 415.per ^___ M� 1...-..C.:::(11 9 . 3:3 /LEA 18 •••:. illyegailiwi,..uR..11Z:".44.7017:11Y1.6.4,17-1t.:Lro -‘1:'>4.atiAl -5..1')‘.111144/1 <q•A•ii, i •cSs. e...7 ,..•,,, .. , •P i • Cri A-••- -cri: . A... ,,-,?:›3? '._/ rIPR' it ty. >,f E`nAltr3!ri . y.F !t Irl` .. `�.' K:a :� P ,ah�:� :fir` ,tv ofttAi S.: �� �rt..�r.� nRn7e-�:s+.•+s�•.� 4 Kl/ :578':tioam-a ' • Z ti 1m y 1•nc. � � 11 �1`i C7' W A� �b ' ' P Tru _s- �I' n• �4,� .+n II' C I ace-TWO' :`Si fI j(3- fru - j 3 1f 00p •, (u bi Must o .�� 13 A Oa 9. :.i $4 'LIMAS C. ----:-- 1'1 (I 1. k co -4'4? frittiE7:: mini ' . . 4215 an Et•is aine,:.::'..._ •iCi� � ' �, - r .�Iii9E€E'J'ir.=c1i�51?'tea^ Alo ii: _. .� cLQ ¢ fI L••�E �$r/_. .'ilia_..,,,,.f:,.:1'i_F..':r-�. �m . m .• !.Bk. �©5ii �'�?i t t:�' .._.._ . _ :if / v ::-:: . f a ` .1161:i . ;*;1��- :�: •,�, ..t(n 7iusfCo.o''C'` = . A C rustAkll •% .-`. rse_.`,ii: j., Q J ', 74.5, iiitt,-I:. NI . :••p:Qui•' NORTH Exhibit "A" May 02. 2001 8:51:06 a.m. AcodVcr:14.0 Drowing: F:\CADD\2133.30\B00\SITEEXHIBIT.DN'G (230) COW HEY Site Location map FIGURE NO. GUDMUNDSON LEDER , LTD . Bowes Creek Estates PROJECT ND. 2133.3 City of Elgin DATE 04/12/01 ITASCA, ILLINOIS 60143 Kane County, Illinois SCALE nts CONSULTING ENGINEERS DRAWN BY : N1n (630) 250-9595 _ CHECKED BY : 0 COPYRIGHT 2001 r . , . ,„ .v.t$?4,_.,4i. ••• ..0e40441::sws‘ IN sztsk,,,, , . . , ! lokt.- - ‘NI....:61tss s st 18.s'64. 4,4'444-X....N1% i ,,4Li'3`,*,:. W.NeiNti, v\r4stsh.. INV*1):\A.- , 'i* \ , N.:14 44t.sz 'k''''''416,0'44".,i2i. N.ML Ni• eitAfellVailikee ItIN * )1t*44& 7t4k4141\\*Nre‘ ‘ IL)44Vitia N, 17§74'4"*4.' 4''':'1§111i-iNito--- , 'N''„1:::tk4.k\SSaj\\V't* „.iiNi \ .46.4%,..÷. .4i.b. N , 4 \‘1 ts . i14.411k\NI Itt1/4x4-4 ot 1S, '7,,,,t_tsk,,S,c:Iktit*I...\744141 „t*, 1 44,\VIZ.. NspZIN'' gi,*-14414,c :Ti - \\ \ \16 N44*.x:SAI k% 4&_.'4,46\ti,.:. •ikitiLtikVIA ''' -* -' kbakti" 's." :„.14RS IPt44‘, **tbh• �'G'� +a► •°S:`fit«; Sit;;!---!: V4alet firteiN I.'1-;:t. ' •Vilt! '''--1 - ,:q-. te,0%, .x' w D ,*\\ `'p .c, , F., \\t 1\11 .. ....4,,,....:,t,Olvilm'p,,,,,11-44#8,,,, tip,._, ,,,,,:e.rka: 70,,er' ‘-,:w.,-,,,,t,,,-,.N.., .1.,-.. ,,--'*1 kr T.,,,:1145* .011'••'''.'t"Tit;TV, '' i' ,.. .4p-.1.4"-„E.., c ^� `'.!.f�q``„. 'k{}. Imo/ ♦�.._ OI. 3* ti • Exhibit "C" OXI)W iew0r'.AocliVc Cti2\kris..-4 COWHEY - FIGORE No, GUDMUNDSON PROJECT NO, 2133,30 LEDER , LTD . FPA Exhibit 300 PARK BOULEVARD Bowes Creek Estates DATE 04/10/01 ITASCA, ILLINOIS 60143 City of Elgin SCALE 1"=2040` CONSULTING ENGINEERS Kane County, Illinois DRAWN By : w�� (630) 250-9595 CHECKED BY : 0 COPYRIGHT 2001 FPA ANNEXATION EXHIBIT — P"""" PROPOSED ANNEXATION "Ali CB-N 69'35'06'E TO(RWRO TPA �. �6 R41735.02' 10.263 AC.t NIP L-1x7.1s' CB4N 6747'14- 6 ..--1 �® O N 67'x9'O6�E R4114559.00' 299.01' 1..1206.31' 'OINT OT COMMENCING wr w r w»a..r5,v n ua..wa-» 5 7136'N'f BOWES ROAD '•'09'33'E _ N 68'37'18'E `y, 22:3„..t......4.54. .� :�lttt� PANT D<BEGINNING 1PARCEL 1 no..........g(._.._, go Y• l�-.raw•m,o:00.V.,',.. \ u.y ! J70 ja. CB.N 72'21'29'.W N/-770.31' ' 4w"0"..'°0t Usti S��0'J6. .°°a,a. ((1ryaS O&u W,.IsbAN �3q',RLs201.82• O 5 0009'JSn E ej .S 7J• "OCvw At RA!(R �rPA BOUNDARY LINE— ' N 0001',17'w •Fb,• ., .!b 9 OAO M t 1' 106.60' 'f4 roS�5a1 +, .Ja,'•r ' ! u..»5nU.nw at.•.c tc.l2 A L'26Q,03' ` .wr.,t - ' 845811.55. ., ///''' 1004. 411. V n V,d M aMwEAST pf.Ntsh.o or t[m..�OEf .• I a rrn 1 r N• rcuo+i raw 0•w.m.,aiaaa.K.*,ew.n a nrt i'-'''''''';,'-'';"::':': ,',;,,• ',• •:F.;-.//..'''A'' .'� Q, I U.If S.W..,OKORII'.i &—x/71//3 f -r E- I NORTH PARCEL(PARCEL 1) Legal Description THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25,TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A FOUND IRON ROD AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE SOUTH 00°09'35" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 16.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF BOWES ROAD FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00°09'35" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 25, A DISTANCE OF 552.60 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE ILLINOIS GULF AND CENTRAL RAILROAD PER DEED DATED DECEMBER 8, 1886 AND RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 9508; THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES ARE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE; 1) THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 72°21'29" WEST AND A RADIUS OF 5831.65 FEET, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 201.82 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 74°22'50" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1503.54 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID BOWES ROAD; THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES ARE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE; 1) THENCE EASTERLY ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 89°35'06" EAST AND A RADIUS OF 1735.02 FEET, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 127.15 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; 2) THENCE NORTH 87°29'08" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 299.01 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY HAVING A CHORD BEARING OF NORTH 87°47'14" EAST AND A RADIUS OF 114559.00 FEET, FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 1206.34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL IN KANE COUNTY ILLINOIS CONTAINING 10.263 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS. F:\CADD\2133\512\FINAL\NORTHPARCEL.txt & .ans u ET . /6iTE" Ze, SOUTH PARCEL(PARCEL 2) Legal Description THOSE PARTS OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 25, THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION 36 AND THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 35 ALL IN TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 7 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A FOUND IRON ROD AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE SOUTH 00°09'35" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 770.34 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ILLINOIS GULF AND CENTRAL RAILROAD PER DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 8, 1886 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 9508 FOR A POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00°09'35" EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1869.01 FEET TO A FOUND IRON ROD AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 00°18'36" EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 2656.69 FEET TO A FOUND IRON ROD AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 88°31'19"WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 5335.16 FEET TO A FOUND IRON ROD AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE SOUTH 88°09'53" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35, A DISTANCE OF 1679.35 FEET TO A FOUND IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 00°27'05" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 877.10 FEET TO A FOUND IRON ROD; THENCE NORTH 84°29'45" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 374.88 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF CORRON ROAD AS MONUMENTED AND OCCUPIED; THENCE NORTH 32°04'34" EAST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 638.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STURBRIDGE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SUBDIVISION THEREOF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 16, 1978 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 1479286; THENCE SOUTH 83°40'00" WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, 1747.45 FEET TO A FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SUBDIVISION BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE NORTH 00°49'07" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 1450.60 FEET TO A FOUND IRON ROD AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 36; THENCE NORTH 88°31'14" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF, 1320.70 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25;THENCE NORTH 00°46'55" WEST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 2645.89 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 88°37'18" EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1308.82 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A PARCEL CONVEYED TO COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY PER DEED RECORDED MARCH 16, 1978 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 1448597; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL FOR THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES; 1) THENCE SOUTH 71°56'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 220.54 FEET; 2) THENCE SOUTH 73°20'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 772.87 FEET; 3) THENCE NORTH 00°04'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 108.60 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE AFORESAID ILLINOIS GULF AND CENTRAL RAILROAD; THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES ARE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID RAILROAD; 1) THENCE SOUTH 73°20'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1550.94 FEET TO A TANGENT CURVE; 2) THENCE EASTERLY ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5641.65 FEET FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 260.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING ALL IN KANE COUNTY ILLINOIS CONTAINING 596.503 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS. F:\CADD\2133\512\FINAL\SOUTHPARCEL.doc & . ans 1 06/09/2000 Oa ks Lor I LOT t 1---- _ NE/ONRORNOOD 1tar frir ii, \ ASE5A ' ©ml'N`1!15, ..0/M00 :6 'i PARK 417 0 t© 0 ,_ yPi '0 �� "Phi . " „Al'D. '4710'' ::,.. !,,,,,,,r, :44;40:4, moi; , 10 Oho 0 il '©Dr Air - 0 I , e/ v / 1 Val: Uli` o d" \01/.:" / r .GOLF COURSE %Ill D o 0 ° ''')) w 1 ��m0m0 I )( o •0 0 ` I I = tit 0�'�O, , 1 °--- O I oGdOa� �.'.� CA*"P t �0 A /lk /._%v / LF C. R, O ��© h ,.driar`® " PARK ©©� �� 00 0 O y����� O _ • Mr s�,00I., . .00000® ,. , � ©© ©moo a yam a ' �' o © �,, � �\ _ri Amo,.:„mom 0�0 EmBB 11 o moa I mo �n�n�mo _ mmc. m�99� ©O o� al ,...•- il� O 0m a414 o1► 4 4 o m�!!'!, ., :��7m©�©°m©0' ; �!"1 �f�4ad2@©© 00o m���O�J� oo.© c'� tza�v� o us �ommmr�i ♦ a lr- ©o©©o~ ~�© 0am~.,~mm..~~-� ~ �.jiPP,- �aa� �4. kms'MIN o mm,'.,,..�a�_n,• --- cote EXHIBIT F la W is : 300 PAW cowHEY GUDMUNDSON tRDER, gra- REVISIONS _ BOWES CREEK ESTATES NEIGHBORHO00 PHASING PLAN comms i� _ W liAscA, nl�ors sorsa = __ = ELGIN, ILLINOIS CHECKED-_ n m File: 2133.30-300 Date: May 2, 2001 rink Bowes Creek Estates POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLE FORECAST (Approximate) FOR PROPOSED RWRD FPA ANNEXATION ARE(608.0 Ac.) DEVELOPMENT AREA LAND USE DESCRIPTION Lot 1 Residential Lot 2 Residential Neighborhood 1 29 Single Family Units Neighborhood 2 77 Single Family Units Neighborhood 3 88 Single Family Units Neighborhood 4 140 Townhouse Units Neighborhood 5 52 Single Family Units Neighborhood 6 21 Single Family units Neighborhood 7 95 Single Family units Neighborhood 8 43 Single Family units Neighborhood 9 38 Single Family units Neighborhood 10 Neighborhood 11 72 Single Family units 88 Single Family units Neighborhood 12 31 Single Family units Open Space Golf Course&Open Space SUMMARY LAND USE TOTAL NO. OF UNITS Single Family Units 634 Townhouse Units 140 Total Residential 774 Exhibit G Cowhey Gudmundson Leder,Ltd. JOB#2133.3-302 May 2, 2001 SANITARY SEWER FLOW PROJECTION FOR "--ek 608 ACRE ANNEXATION INTO FRWRD F.P.A. BOWES CREEK ESTATES CITY OF ELGIN KANE COUNTY, ILLINOIS SAM4-1t4V.VIAIW '21-,iz,-;_,4:: ...:' :f1 :;4:t,,Vii'ae DWELLING P.E./D.U. TOTAL ,AND USE UNITS P.E. ;INGLE FAMILY LOTS 634 3.50 2,219.00 — TOWNHOUSE UNITS 140 3.50 490.00 _ – 3OLF COURSE&SWIM CLUB I 0 — 35 TOTAL P.E.ESTIMATE I 2,744.00 P.E. 6ort€4, v ' -; /I• t:o,- li Cu at140. 'i.,:et. „:20.1-,1:WMAZMWWAW-07'4,1WV:,''411—MW-A7 - 1 _ 4A—tA GE FLOW: 2,774 X 100 GAIL/PE/DAY = 277,400 GPD r.E.P.A. PEAK FACTOR: 3.4750 MI 11111.111111.111111 —PEAK FLOW: 274,400 GPD 1111131111 34750 = 953,540 GPD -------IT ;AIIIIIINIMIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIMI _ _ ___ -- - - UNIT CONVERSION: 953,540 GPD 662.18 GPM @ 0 002228= 1.475 CFS - _ STVWEIOWC,.. '''' 4::A4V4.41 4194.'riVINWP.Int;'4A4i3e;r41:4 :V.-i VTP4110.40: cirdifr.:7t;', ----- ;EWER MINIMUM FLOW(Q) AiE SLOPE CFS 2011111111= - -- - 0.40% 0.76 344.00 10" 0.28% 1.16 521.00 _ -- 21..- :4 i?,% :!::::: :': 44 WIT51 taFffP, ft: 3 :7 15" -- 0.15% 2.52 1131.00 - - 18" - 0.12% 3.68 1652.00 MEM -_ i I I i_ ** INDICATES MINIMUM PIPE SIZE TO ADEQUATELY SERVE THE TOTAL TRIBUTARY AREA-- 1 - - 1 -- 1--- rim' EXHIBIT H Page 1 of 1 COWHEY GUDMUNDSON LEDER, LTD. CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LAND SURVEYORS • NATURAL RESOURCES ROBERT E.COWHEY,P.E ROBERT W.GUDMUNDSON,P.E. PAUL D.LEDER,P.E RANDALL A.DRUECK,P.E JAMES E KOEHLER HUBERT J.LOFTUS,JR.P.E. FILE#2133.3-200 LEE R.KOEHLER,P.L.S. DATE: MAY 4, 2001 ROBERT E COWHEY,111 DONNA L.DELBRIDGE,P.E GARY L.HOERTH,PE. GREGORY M.KARCZEWSKJ,P.E. ROGER S.LOCKWOOD,PE. NORMAN E MACHT EXHIBITS NOT INCLUDED WIGHT A. DT DWIGHT A.TROSTLE,P.E. AT THIS TIME EXHIBIT "1" -ON SITE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM WITH LIFT STATION AND FORCEMAIN. EXHIBIT "J" - OFF SITE SANAITARY SEWER SYSTEM TO PROPOSED OTTER CREEK LIFT STATION 300 PARK BOULEVARD, ITASCA,ILLINOIS 60143 • PHONE:(630)250-9595 • FAX:(630)250-9644 EMAIL:INFO@CGL-LTD.COM • WEBSITE:WWW.CGL-LTD.COM 't111 1.2 (4- - '"-tf-c,,,, ; 0 : , °L-'• 1)ei ' /:1 1 ....d .• L.„: -.' :,--,,,./k/...1 •.-42 kri7 : ---:-.1 -....I •,., ----..94..si )0 ,.r-•• -7-‘‘',.!'"" ,- (-v7 .--"-.c7 ' i L \ y - ,- . •).0' ,,,2:.:..f / I . I . . 6 )1\ , ,.. _ •Vilti'L'E'S/ ;1/1/ en 0 li - 1.1,,,, '. •'.., • i/ 1 I ) ‘ --) ; 1,7 ' -• ' •---"-^s,h.- 44, '.` - ° 9. 1 -. i A,....,' 7, it. ; c. ' -. , .. .-, : ,----- • 4. • : ,-, Jr( . ‘, - 4:-. . :-. -,,-.--1-. 1 c ; 1 3 i ,,/ i• r i • II/ 1 // ; ----- ,/ : *--r-L h - .,4 : . • - , : .,,, , ../,11 1. (.4.-•4,4.6 fi,,,,..L.:,..___4, .,.: elf ! ,• ')D 1.. ,Yi;,,., • , "...,...*. "."' • -N3:3 -. I‘ ‘' l ''. \ I -„:-___!:4,00. .i .. ,•., • < ‘t • IP ',i.' ""''',,Ift, 1 _ft.3. ., .- ; . - . ..- — -- _.-. ) s\ e''.1 '' 01 :Li' .7. . '-'' ' - .. • 0 0111 / 1 ' r'.ji ‘;;.'.: )r ,• • •• , . c7v-, ,..,,, .. 0. • \ CD • `-z: -\ /\-• -,to , • , -- • 'fir ( 66.-___AL.A5,..)\...,;E, • ‘4--..„, ... .„-/./ ). ,..' , .-i, ,' ,(,. r+- 1 \iv, 2 ,(.,, __ . .. 4,. \--, ‘,. .c s, • s •,,, 3. : /---1 ') 1 ' , „- . .- •l'-', '- t, ..,,-"-- , ,—, -., • 1 ::.. \ - 1 (-. )k, : ;'".,'. /,, k j n „,..*- )4 ' . 1-`..\'-',-..„°-;:- -tif , — 1,/:,;' 1 ger; ,-,.' ' -',::•(,.`;',i/H' 1 '---s . -1.4 %WI •.j.rs:, . ' 1,:: 'S.----,11. ,IA1, '"2, n,- :I-4,- --;.''':,':":4,--ye-En4 n ••,,,-,,--J,'. i y.,.- .,-;-,- ..,.... ,41 it,i r,,,.. f\'.'-,1t.I''' - ,-,--,.:',---,-, • c .c.---N _i__/i,--,rAit',,,,--.40 ,....„..-____ _JA:,..(.„;? )11:1 (_, i."1 ,.---r+-..,J./•—•,- - 1,.. % ,\ 'ts--7/----,-, ),,,),1_,, i 0 01 .,-7-_ n,-.-- .- nli:in,,.. ,- ,n; ' r',.-: t il i f ,,'% ,i7,4;'/-. ( ,..._-_,„4_,•,. 1 I k Z -••,..•-•----:z:-_, I -• _ 1,4,, ,;,, i 1-, 1.;:F:,:". L--e'"i,....;"; (- f.-.'fmll's ec_\___‘\L"1•0 ,,,,,' li _A— " _:',A,...403, , Ifc, ‘I.,,,, ,,__,...../.e:4, ) ,/, ,.....- , ,. j•l\-„,„\ ,---,z..9,/ ,, L..---, or.. ; \-..._....•- ,,-- n''sk' 0 4,.,,,r ://:'-'' ._)(.,7.-\., 1, 4 % , -4-,..„_..A L„,,-• -3 c_ _ ,,;. • -•..,........„; -• ) - -ii 7•-k\t , Q. 7 . ,-• , . 1----\--. ft.7z.•"4-- - .-.'",-,' -G-3 .4';' ,, ,-.: 1 ......isim....._ -7,-,, i,- ,,, Thi/ . r.,t, ,,, i 1(2 ,--• '• :- \ ) MI Aim) ir ( \ (2 .. \1 i,. --'1'.. I ,,,„VI , 1(,.\ NiSi\ 7', V ' ') N's,I -'? "\,... , -'--ti.:' - t, 1 \ ./7......_..., _:______,,.. , , /.......„11-,-,--t...„ • ,.....„ ..., ci.., .6, , _ ..,... 1432 • . C. .-'(.. ',L.,_\---4,,'"."-s;:•-•-,. '.., __.- __--3 1 - 1 r--- ( t-1 ' '- I i co .I I) . '-• 7 ,._,, :.—-_ ::::_1...._(:).....—(f ;!, ( ( , ' 1 (' \„, ? Exhibit "K" May 02,2001 fk3Z22 an,AcedVor)14.0 Drovoinip CACAO°\213.3.30 WO\USGS,EXMOIT.006(230) COWHEY r G U D M U N D S O N USGS Hydrologic Atlas FIGURE NO. LEDER , LTD . 300 PARK BOULEVARD Bowes Creek Estates PROJECT NO. 2133.3 City of Elgin DATE 04/23/01 ITASCA, ILLINOIS 60143 Kane County, Illinois SCALE n ts CONSULTING ENGINEERS DRAWN BY : vfn (630) 250-9595 CHECKED BY : 0 COPYRIGHT 2001 ... eift I �'K1 6a-- .. • ; ifs ; a i GT `` '114,71,--- • -1,--.. ..-...,if r r =� T fi1y;:0 -.,.. is � l { N'•I''u`l :. r.• 1 ter !; \ — 1 ! I T .y••z.1. 1-.7>/:',411/M •,-)1..., i 11 . ;•.142-14,1—/ t J • Cilli ' i.t, .I ,oi ), ., '..' ."laki. 4,,„,.•:::) it.- 0), it 1 P.Q util f n o ?v )Zr. / n el- • I I( .1: .':1 f I H fwl A "Is"Y - • •• _1 1 .• ,,,,,0 9_ • • 1..'..c. •••••-1.$ V.SO4. iiii"•.; ("1"' /�► -•,.. ,�•� -I-.--�-s.,, YyM may;„=J• -'.- ,- . �'-' A • ' z/ j` e-47 i , i I, , Ja +�'1-'-- •• - ' ` ` - AIWA(' ' 'iat+¢�4..,�.... ,42) t. 4 , _ 1 NORTH Exhibit "L-l" Yg,02.2001 315:04 Fm.AtaRWr:11.0 Dro.4.R r:\C Q0\1133.30\000\Y+lC0I 41.OMO(230) COWHEYelk FIGURE NO. GUDMUNDSON National Wetlands Inventory LEDER , LTD . Bowes Creek Estates PROJECT NO. 2133.3 300 PARK BOULEVARD City of Elgin DATE 04/12/01 ITASCA, ILLINOIS 60143 Kane County, Illinois sCa E nts CONSULTING ENGINEERS DRAWN BY : vfn (630) 250-9595 _ CHECKED BY : 0 COPYRIGHT 2001 ---.... —NS:‘'\.-;t\ ------ ........ ..".......- . ---,... ofts... 1 .. t ' rt .... - ..._.._. ..,......... .......-- ----- --_'.,...,,,i:........., ,2.1,..,.....":.....7_1 _ "1—.2:71- -- r, --T.'—'..- ....-- ,-\,.:.,, -'' N\,.,s,,, •;.,4,.i'. : ..'7'.f • __ • \),.));,N4' _11* :i; .**H-----*--- , ..:A.0 fr..ik. . ; . .- ' 4°&./Vi•s\ .,,,..;;M:s.;' My 1 la* .-1 ,. , 0 „ „.4 4,04. ‘--)\,...Y a - - 0 i.r.1-,-§,-,- . ..•,.../ !„.?. ,. , ,... ...4: 1 i ......... . r(5.-„,... „,„,,, , t„,,i.---4,71101. . , a: 4% .v.f. ._. • ‘ , !?, --- -----/- ----- ::,..: v pri,A-i,,,-- 41/-/,01, 'N: • 44 •••,' . 00 .. . // 2 , ,_„....--;,'-,,,<?.,:l'::".'''•-• - ;4111reks .„... „1,....„, . .,... __ . ...•••:-„,' 0 // ilk :-..,..1 , ""---'-----...t. . --,... re ,-... • ;,--- erc,,0 0 - _.,,,,,...../... , • • ,cs,,,,,-,..,../ „,„ _. r , (,....,,i:!:,i:%:::,.,:,:r. .,... .... llir N? c•-•-/e .-— .„.. ..'..0 // ' <:,..:( eittis . rf: A. -- 0 ,. • _ _ J.. \c\' *r\-:.---.0\011 ',,,,,.&::EV:,*.m•-•:N k= 1 iglekea.i: X....;„:1,.....).".' . p . t.61,i'?,e50:.:*.k.::0 •••34t. JL •••-•:::" . ....:7 ---, f.'*-4a. (-. • .„.......... -sj ' •,'--,. 1 % ' l• \ . .-..to0• / • ' " ___.../•- //7N //)rilitt. L::_______ ..,- .....,....„,„„ • ,. . .„. . 6-1 61._______, :.. „,/ /r.•_ ___-_----...---- -."\-\... .. .,,e,„....„_...,.•:"..” \, .... It' 4 t- to us 6 EXHIBIT t...2 u.• COWHEY GUDMUNDsoN LEDER.LTD. REVISIONS 900 PARK 1,0140970 - —- — BOWES CREEK ESTATES WETLAND MITIGATION EXHIBIT ocsa.wr—lb t - —- — ELGIN.ILLINOIS CONSULTING mammas(130)000-0006 = —- -.-- IL.,.... IL., 47= - - ro,s:.et ..K1• .=`.ti sett,...� .t$, ,, wo. i, ...m„ . 9£ - ' i �. 4 ,;! t t:f1Cr,- 4: ....i Fes'""''/Y' -- .wo, O[ ;tet 1.10 t£ O£ III eir.- e T Y�,'r 1 f : it '. _ X .._ ,) _ It cam;. _ _ __ - : ;f� _, 1. .44. ?:T- �'. '- r 1444 ,'2-.71" ---r7.-r-: / f y.• 4 \ ''.,---vi? :'t 3:7Y.4.•!.1,01 . . Sk.;..,,,,;, .irtkJe.'Af-,. '..i.&IJ : /,‘ z,'7,,,i-, a '+ , r,,. .4 Jy� i / ..,.,2,0"tM1.��f'i:".-4 A , t CC •••• ....,):,A,,,.;0•,,,.?..j., ,,,, ,"4' s_}_C°`5y Vii'AA i woz * ; Exhibit "Mtn r....Z2w~i2 COWHEY Firm Map FIGURE NO. GUDMUNDSON PROJECT NO. 2133,3 LEDER , LTD , Bowes Creek Estates DATE 04j14j04 300 PARK BOULEVARD City of Elgin ITASCA, ILLINOIS 60143 Kane County, Illinois SCALE nts CONSULTING ENGINEERS DRAWN 8Y : On (630) 250-9595 CHECKED BY : © COPYRIGHT 2001 • t.: , .-. 1 _ r--1----- t,',-:„....z.4--J.- ;-..,--.;...'s -..;•,.% --:_, -------Qir...- I - . t ra ! ra\ \ ,./ , ,../ • . • I ,- :I t"-:„I-•l::..,:-- — l) 2),i &é- ja . .... • ,-,t ,i _ . 3_ 7, c..?., , r'S A VI ., _ ,^1r-H) •f• (Th_., .. // I: ..i . , 2. /' ,,....., -.. .,. ;"""r.---,,,r-------.".. ,.'-'5.' : - • ..)'''. - it' /. 1, i .. ? .... ---\ • 1 - :, ' . ' 4. c:,/Z .."1 ' .414 I ....., Cl) ad C. • Lt , . '/ 1- Sz: 0 ' --, ' ets f •. ,'• ;-c., 4 :=1• i; , 0 / 1%17. t ( 1 •_, .i... I'' A z 41111V),(y.::-' .0._ I • ' 0 .7,c- 1 , • - I\ . Y?7iNagir / 01 ?_z''' - ‘(.. --'• - :.-"N, . ,.. ;,, ' - - -• , :-.. . ... ii r -.= • • - . _ "••••-..,,...)..\;:•.1(::. '(-:-- =(•,-,,,.\_, . 4, i ,." ; i • . :,.. , , , --- ,..,, .• • , . .• . ,,...., •\:, t. %op- -:. .,,, ,.. ./ - is_ ::. • - :. .,-',.‘,.•). \-,,,..., , -. , . • 1 % . ,.., = ___.--,:iiii ,-..„..,2-- • , k - .:, • 416 •••• *4 , " cs1 71. r.) • ' . tl.tt t -4-.1...•--7" / ,• '--.-L-••''( :- - - N. • ,.. • = ';, •-:-..',•.\ ..,, i••..''.,,,i..;; •,•• 7" . ' ' ''' I . li,"•••:,•. . • A V '''' '7"7•-‘1,7:.* ' /-• alter • i . I • N''''N ••••-• •''•••'.• - * ;4,.) , .,.,,f- "sit' • ,:." .1: *:t '::1 t. 7 • . '"*) i., -..., -. 5. . • .1. !4... • .-1. '.%-'- ,...1 a :,-\•:•:, l• z- ., . .../ • -v -•-.-• -., ..,-.. '...; ,,,,, : •/• .z, s-,:c.-•• ,:. , ..., . 4,._ - - -. Nagb•.. .-......,-.., .-• ‘,:, - \ - . . .. *-'.0 -,.::.--,..... ..•,.... -,.,-. , y'!_:;.,--i.2.-.4-1- •,--: ' '- 2.1. •-' ft: '1 : ' KS'?-.,..;:.... --••'. °-:,•;.i'/.... .. . • - • • ,-':2)-r•-.L,.--=,‘.--___:::. 2, , ti.„.; ..\,2•,.- , ':,' ".=- l',',.,'. ''::Ifi,t;iV• 7.0'.-..1.4, ,.,• .',,, "•-:-n4 -* ',... --'4•1°•--. '.7.•!..:' ....4--i''.• '' '• : ' .-- •-•-• .;'3, -::',...;:;,'.."'-At's-. ''.,--'--''' i •.7- • '1';^:',...- NORTH Exhibit "N Wit30‘11:03=".V5Z ellik COWHEY GUDMUNDSON Kane County Soil Survey F I CURE NO. PROJECT NO. 2133 LEDER , LTD . Bowes Creek Estates 300 PARK BOULEVARD City of Elgin DATE 04/12A ITASCA, ILLINOIS 60143 Kane County, Illinois SCALE n I CONSULTING ENGINEERS DRAWN BY : v (630) 250-9595 CHECKED BY : i7t") COPYRIGHT 2001