HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCDATE=OCTOBER 06, 2004 (8) • ZONING AND SUBDIVISION HEARING BOARD
CITY OF F.I.GIN
MIND I ES OF MEETING
October6, 2004
The regulw noting of the Zoning land Subdivision hearing Dowd was called to order at 7 07p M.
on Wednustoy, October 6, 2004, in the City Council Chamber,by Chairman Langlois.
MembersPresent William Rhymes,Jack prefer,Ralph Tibor, Dodge] Weilerand Chainmen Robert
Langlois,
Members Absent: Michael Hilker and Tom Krrbsbach
Staff Present: Lauren Petrie, Senior Plarmo, Jan Ward, Senior Planner and Seewb Saheo, Urban
Design and Preservation Specialist
ApprovalofMiattIO: Mr. %Vetter. moved to approve the minutes effete September 1, 2006 regular
meeting, asaubmitted. Mr. Roder sccunded the rention, which was adopted by i vote of four les,
zero no and one abstention.
• Oath Adminktered: Thccotm repnrteradmiristend decoth to all peaarv; desirine to Justify.
PE'I I PIONS TO BE HEARD:
CONSIDERAT ION OFPPTITION 59-pt REOUFSTNC CONDITIONAL USF.APPROVAL FOR
A PLANNED DFVFL OPMENT TUYFRMIT A CHURCH IN THE AH AREA BUSINESS
DISTRICT' P R OPERTY_40CAI Ell AT 202S_LAU;NAVEN'UF BY ALL NATION'S
WORSHIP CFNTER,_AS APPLIC:ART AND UNION NA'f1ONAl BANK OF ELGIN LAN
TROSI' GII RO\ALDJ VOLHFRDNG, DENEFICWtY AS OW\'ER,
MO"PION FAILE�2 YES. d NO
Testimony k contained within a verbatim transcript recorded at the public hearing within a
Conditional Use Review end prepared by the Community Development Group Obj¢rors were
present and spoke. her. Heim moved to recommend that Petition 59-ted be approved, subject to the
oiaitions outlined in the Conditional Use Review. He revised bio motion to include two inure
conditions, condition seven which was "the church nee shall he limited to All Natloi s Worship
Center, Usaid ehunchwereto cease operations no other church shallbepennated to cosmic atthe
subject property. Such condition shall be subject to review and approval by the Corporation
Counsel"and condition eight which was"the proposed use shallbe subject to the hours nfnperation
as identified on page two Mlle Conditional Use Review^, Mr. Ruder seconded the motion, which
failed by a vote oftwo yes and three no,
•