HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCDATE=SEPTEMBER 06, 2000 (12) • subject to the conditions for approval as outtinM in the Conditional Use Review. Mr.Hamlin seconded
the motion, which was adopted by a vote of six yes and zcm no.
CONSIDERATION OF PETITION 51- URF, LFS} NW, A VARTAT1ON OF SECTION 19 30 135
SITE PSIGN PART ORt SEI BACK ' BY IAT LINE O I BLRLOI NG SEfB/
SI'RFEi�T➢�_GE THE CITY OF EL N ZONING oxnlNAN( F.; 1'SL[ILV11'f THE
RPDUMION OF A M1NIDIUM RECMMI) STREET BIIILDJNG SETBACK IN A CF
COMWTY FACg1TYD))ISIRTCEINORDePTOpF MI,R TTHEPL NFDEXPANSIONOF
AN EI UCAl'IONAL FACILITY KNOWN 1S AB➢Ol"f MIDDL OOL PROPERTY'
LOCATED A'f 949 VANSTREBTBYSCUDOL IMTR1C'T LJ-46SAPITLkN'1'A\DOWNER
NOTION T O CONfTNUE - i Y S 0 NO I ABSI'ENLON
' ,esdmony is contained within a verbmim transcript recorded at the Panic Hearing and a Variation
Review prepared by the Derelopmeat Community Group. 1fr. Drvcc Dahlyain, Arvhitttt,prczenteJ
the petition.
At ]:58 p.m. the Zoning and Subdivision bearing Board held a five minute recess to meet with the
applicant rot discussion regarding Petition 5 1-00. The board reconvened the meeting at 8:06 p.m., at
whiehtime Mr. Dahlquist requested a two week continuance for Petition 51-00.
Mr ilwahn moved to recommend a continuance of Petition 51-00 to the September 20, 20011, regular
mooing ofthe Zoningandes andisio, Hearingonai imitation.
Tysondelthemotion,whichwas
•
adopted by avote of live yes rota zero no, with one abstention. Mr. Tyson abstained because M1c oxns
property in the arca.
cUMNIARY OF PESITNGEFVEL1)P.MkN`T PLjCA flOn
Nit, Rothenberger gave a summary of pending development appbcatiorls.
OTILER_B fNEiL. None.
ADJ U3NNEi T. Thembeing no tuMerbusiness,Chairman Tiburi adjourned the meeting at x:15
p.m.
Respectfully snbmilwd, n
Rothmber�ry 5 ^
• DATE. AFPROVED BY THE ZONING AND SUBDIVISION IIEARTNG BOARD
iO 4F