HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCDATE=MARCH 18, 1998 (2) • petition review. Mr. Khan seconded the motion, which was
adopted by vote of five yes and zero no .
CONSIDERATION OF PETITION 20-98 REQUESTING VARIATIONS OF THE
ELGIN ZONING ORDINANCE IN THE CC2 CENTER CITY DISTRICT TO
PERMIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFFICE BUILDING' PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 223 DUNDEE AVENUE BY BILL KOKALIAS , AS APPLICANT AND BY GUS
CANOE, AS OWNER.
MOTION ADOPTED - 5 YES, 0 NO
Testimony is contained within a verbatim transcript recorded at
the Public Hearing and a Petition Review prepared by the
Planning Department . The applicant presented the petition. No
objectors were present . Hopkins moved to approve Petition
20-98, subject t0 ended conditions for approval . Mr . Khan
ontletl the motion, which was adopted by veto of five yes and
zero no.
CONSIDERATION OF PETITION 22-98 REQUESTING A CONDITIONAL USE
FOR A MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR SHOP IN THE AS AREA BUSINESS
DISTRICT' PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1190 NORTH MCLEAN BOULEVARD, BY
RICHARD L . KOTF.RA, AS APPLICANT AND OWNER .
MOTION ADOPTED - 5 YES , 0 NO
• Testimony is contained within a verbatim transcript recorded at
the Public Hearing and d Petition Review prepared by the
Planning Department . The applicanL presented the petition . No
objectcr5 were present . Mr. Hamlin moved to approve Petition
22-98 , subject to the conditions for approval as outlined In the
petitionr eview. Mr. Tyson seconded the motion, which was
adopted byvote of five yes and zero no.
CONSIDERATION OF PETITION 23-98 REQUESTING A VARIATION OF THE
ELGIN ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 19 . 25 . 335 E . 41 SETBACKS BY LOT
LITHE REAR SETBACK, TO PERMIT 'TXR CONSTRUC'T'ION OF A SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ENCROACHMENT INTO THE REQUIRED REAR
YARD WITHIN THE SFR2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT; BY
COLONIAL ENTERPRISES, IN. , AS APPLICANT AND RANDALL RIDGE IV
PARTNERS, INC . , AS OWNER .
NOTION ADOPTED - 3 YES, 2 NO
Testimony is nonlained within a verbatim transcript r orded at
the Public Hearing and Petition Review prepared by the
Planning Department . The applicant presented the petition.
Neighboring propertyexpressed concerns about the rear
yard setback reduction. Mr. Tyson moved to approve Petition
23-98 , subject to the Conditions for approval as outlined in the
petitionw. Mr. Khan seconded the motion which was
adopted byrvote of three yes and two no .
• SUMMARY OF PENDING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
Mr . Armstrong gave a summary of pending development applications .
MIN03 . 18/PZTE%T/2000AD.'PS/2100BRD . COM/212OZ&S . HBD/MINUT.MST