HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCDATE=JULY 05, 2005 (8) Commission shmdd have had the opportunity to review the application declare of the
• mncarrs it ha,c raised with neighbors who think Data driveway on that popery is not
appmpnate due to die small sive of that pmawriv
Connnissioner Durrenberger asked Mr. Sxhenvhen administrative approval was granted
and when items ware brought before the tidal Review Subcomunince for their review.
Mr. Susan stated that adminishmlvc approval was grunted for items such as mots, fences,
dmavs and minor maintenance_ As long ax these items meet the requirements of the
Des_mGuide inns said building and zmting cedes. they are routinely appmced by stair.
In the rise of the subject driveway the application nut the requirements both of the
otarigcodes and Dcsi,u Guidelines and was approved.
Conunissioner Durombcr,cr disagreed with Mr. Sather on this issue mid requested the
Commission further discuss items that need administrative approval vs. Design Review
Subcorumitroe approval.
Mr. Salter suggested that since it was an iccne more for the Design Review Subcommittee
to discuss that this be brought try at their upcominu meeting, which would brut, the issue
up for dixussion strainer than if the Cummission %vaftm until the next whole Commission
seting in August. Adcidonallg it was suveested (fiat due to the lata hour in the day,
that discussion becomirrd at the next ma Ping of the Design Review Subcomeltve.
• G. Correspondence,
II. Executive Session
1. Adjournment:
Motion made by Commissioner Hamed to adloum.
The motion was seconded by Commissioner Killeen.
The motion passed a arammu nlY.
'Phe meeting was adjourned at Murano
Respectfully sabmmud,
2"' �
Sally Rasmussen
Administrmive Secretary
• Community Development