Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCDATE=OCTOBER 02, 2000 (3) • CONSIDERATION OF PLPTTIOV s9-O0 REOUESTMG A MAPA LND m�T Fuo\f AB AREA NLISMLSS Dlnl�CT TO OT_GENERAL INDUSTRIAL Dra—RTCTL PROPEXR1Y I OCATFDATII50TODDVAXM0R ' BYTRIUMPHUFVELCPMEN'f CORPORATION ASApPTICCANr, AV�AGEM1TF CROIJPP AteT& MOTION ADOPTED - 5 VPS O ON Testimony is contained within a verbatim trunsetipt mounded at the public hearing at the public hearing and xithin a blip .Amendment Review prepared by Ne C'nmusunity Development Group. The applicant presumed the petition, No objectors were prehvn. Mr. Tinge moved to recommend approval of Petition 59 W,subject to the conditions for approval as outlined in the Map Amendment Review. Mrs. Buttsmdt reversed tire motion, whidnva adopted by a vote of five yes and zero no. SUMMARY OF PENDING APPLICNITONS: Mr. Sandlia d gave a summary of pending applications. OTUERBUSINESS: Noun, ADJOU11NMFNT: 'there being no fedber business, Chair Pro fem Fox adjourned the meeting at 1:23 P.M. Respectfully submitted, - • X aw Turman lCeek, Se nstary DATEAPPROVEDBY THE PLANKING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION I