Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCDATE=JANUARY 04, 2005 (4) taken out for the work that was dear. He had also spokun with an attorney, but had been • told that there was uta much ofa ease if the property owners wished to go after the contractor. Mr. Salter slated that in none caws such as lots, it is usually the nepolimbillly oft lie property owner to el that all pennies rules and Tree Iatiumare IoIlowed, since code "it atiom are made against property on nen not emulations. The Commisvlml seam also required at election to make a Sita m nm the appeal to ruaridaln the existing windows on tho propmry. A mulimn vas made by Commissioner Stroud to uphold the deci.Sion of she Design Review Subcommittee to deny the request of the property owner to maintain the vinyl Iwindows on the property that is recently installed is Wean permits or a COd. lse motion was seconded by Coerotia'ioner Roxw Came. Vow: S yens, 0 uses. fhe lnoti on passed unanmain sly. The der.111011 of she Design Ray iew Subcommi Ree would amain datied. Mr. Saber indicated that the property of oink be imfnmmd of their nem scepsnw hem they,had (Tic oppCirl in appeal this decision to the Elan City Council F. Offal' Ominesd. G. ( moolinndence. • IL Emcntire S"sion I. Adjournment. Motion made by Coy uiedoncr Stroud to atheist. The nnmion was seconded by Cornmissiurea Smith The motion passal unaninwusly. The ossein¢ was adjourned at S'.43 p in Rcspectolly subminctl, RyydldyJ oil Administrative Secretary Planning A \cig encel oral Smites •