Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRSC 05-09-17 - approved 05-23-17Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission May 9, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter, Bill Ristow, Dennis Roxworthy, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Scott Savel and John Roberson CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve the minutes of April 11, 2017, as submitted. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 636 Park St — Removal of existing wood fence, installation of new aluminum (black) fence 1028 Douglas Ave — Replacement of basement windows ITEMS TABLED: 1028 Douglas Ave — Replacement of basement windows — due to nonrepresentation Design Review Subcommittee — May 9, 2017 Page 2 of 5 NEW BUSINESS: 636 Park St — Removal of existing wood fence, installation of new aluminum (black) fence The property owner has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to replace the decorative balustrade fence on the property with a black, aluminum style fence. The request has been submitted due to areas of deterioration at the existing fence. The property owner also indicated that the current fence is high maintenance and cost prohibitive and would like to replace it with a fence that doesn't require associated maintenance. Staff conducted a site visit on May 4, 2017 and found that the fence was in overall good condition with the most deterioration at the post caps. The existing fence is 4' -0" high in the front and side yards with a 6-0" privacy fence in the rear yard. To note, while the fence is not original to the home, it is of an appropriate style. The existing fence was installed in 2001. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Fences A. Should be proportionate to the house and the design should be compatible with the character of the building and district. B. Should be painted white or a trim color related to the house, never left to weather or given a stain finish. E. If placed along common property lines should not be placed against another fence - double line fencing is not permitted. F. Should have posts that are set a minimum of 30 inches below grade and no more than eight feet apart. G. If wood, be of cedar, redwood or pressure treated pine, cypress or other rot resistant wood. Fences in Rear Yard L. Built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. M. Built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. N. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard. 0. Of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. P. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the historic districts. Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval if the following conditions are met: 1. The fence is in the Genesis (preferable) or Classic style. Design Review Subcommittee — May 9, 2017 Page 3 of 5 2. That the finial shall be of the Triad style (preferable) and placed at every other picket. 3. That ball caps are placed at major newel posts such as at each side of the gates and at the corners of the property. The remaining newel posts shall have the standard post cap. 4. That the gates (single and double) shall be in the arched style in the same style as the proposed fence. 5. The fence is no more than 42 inches high at front and side yards. 6. The fence is painted black. If the applicant seeks to repair the existing fence; or remove the fence completely, this may be approved over the counter. Eric Featherston (owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion: Owner stated several portions of the existing wood fence are propped up. Posts were installed with concrete at the base; which is causing excessive moisture and rot. Existing posts are very angular with multiple cuts. Estimates to replace the posts have been significant in cost. Owner is agreeable to the Gensis style. Received information earlier today indicating the finales are about $1.00 a piece, and willing to place them on every other picket. Motion made by Committee Member Diamond to approve the COA with staff recommendations, amended by the following commission requirements: 1) Gensis style fence with rings, 2) finials to be placed on alternating spears /pickets, 3) ball cap on post, 4) all gateways with arch design with finials on top, and 5) staff approval required for any deviation of design listed above. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed unanimously. 1028 Douglas Ave — Replacement of basement windows The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to replace four, fixed, metal basement windows with aluminum -clad wood windows with simulated divided lites. The proposed window will match closely to the existing storm window design. The windows will not change in size. The applicant noted that the existing metal windows are in varying condition (poor to fair) and would like to have two of the windows installed as awning windows to allow for more air ventilation into the basement. The other two windows will be proposed to be fixed. The applicant is also requesting to keep the current configuration of his venting system that is venting out from part of the window located at the rear of the property. The glazing in one of the divided liter was removed to accommodate for the vent. The vent hood on the stove on the first floor is a Tenn -Air downdraft cooktop and the venting would be allowed to be maintained Design Review Subcommittee — May 9, 2017 Page 4 of 5 in its current configuration per code due to this type of appliance. The applicant stating that he would prefer to maintain the vent -hood through the window as making a hole in the brick would be intrusive and costly. Three basement windows can be seen from the public right of way, however, are partially obstructed by vegetation. The remaining basement window proposed to be replaced is located at the rear of the home and is only visible from the alley and partially obstructed from the A/C mechanical system. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary, the recommended replacement should be in -kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked -on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap -on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap -on simple grilles. G. screens and /or storms should be wood or baked -on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double -paned Low -E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low -e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. That the proposed basement windows shall contain three - simulated divided lites (grilled installed on exterior and interior sides of the glazing) and shall fit the width of the original window opening. Design Review Subcommittee — May 9, 2017 Page 5 of 5 2. That the proposed basement window containing the vent shall have two - simulated divided lites and the area where the third light would be will contain a metal panel for the vent. If possible, the vent location shall be flipped so that it is hidden by the A/C mechanical unit and that the portion of the window could be seen from the street. 3. Window glass shall not be tinted. No representation. Item to be tabled. Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to table COA due to non - representation. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond. The motion passed unanimously. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: • City council will heard /consider the 2017 grant application tomorrow night (May 10th) • Mayor's award ceremony received many complimented on award presentations, venue and food. CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Ristow. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 6:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Cindy A. alden Approved: Design Review Subcommittee Secretary May 23, 2017