HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRSC 03-28-17 - approved 04-11-17Design Review Subcommittee
of the Elgin Heritage Commission
March 28, 2017
Minutes
The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter, John Roberson, Dennis Roxworthy, Scott Savel, and John
Wiedmeyer
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Bill Ristow
CITY STAFF PRESENT:
Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve the minutes of February 14, 2017,
as amended (correction of statements within report on page 4 last paragraph, “2x2 square
balusters” to “2x2 square balusters at the stairs” and “…1 ½” x2 harp baluster design” to “…1 ½”
x2 harp baluster design at the porch balustrade .” Correction of statements on page 7 top of the
page, “…a single garage door” to “…a single overhead garage door” and “…two ov erhead doors”
to “two hinged sliding style doors” On the same page, third paragraph, “…brick veneer on
corners” to “…brick veneer all around the garage up to the soffits,” and “…flat overhead door”
to “…panel overhead door.”
The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy.
The motion passed unanimously.
Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve the minutes of March 14, 2017, as
amended (correction of statement within report on page 4, 4th paragraph, “2.5 x 2.5 actual” to
“2.25 x 2.25 actual.”
The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy.
The motion passed 6-0-1 (Diamond abstained).
RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT:
Dan and Pat Miller; John Marston
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 2 of 15
PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION:
Old Business
None
New Business
1. 259 Villa Street – Grant Application: Construction of garage and installation/recreation
of cresting
2. 63 Lincoln Avenue – Installation of Composite Fence
3. 471 Arlington Ave – Rehabilitation of side porch
4. 14-16 S Chapel St – Replacement windows, rehabilitation of front porch
5. 851 Brook Street – Construction of rear addition
ITEMS TABLED:
None
NEW BUSINESS:
259 Villa Street – Grant Application: Construction of garage and installation/recreation of
cresting
The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a
new garage on the property (previous garage demolished in 2015 without a COA/Permit by
prior owners).
The proposed 20’ x 20’ garage will be located towards the rear of the property in the location of
the previous garage that was demolished in 2015 and includes the following: wood frame
construction, smooth cedar cladding – no knots, gabled roof with a 12:12 pitch, one paneled
overhead door, and paneled service door. Additionally, staff has obtained information on the
details of the trim corner boards, casings and the garage door. The garage will be installed on
the existing concrete foundation of the previous garage.
The application has also submitted a COA to install metal cresting that is of a similar design to
the original. The original was damaged and removed by a previous owner and is in fair to poor
condition. As noted by the applicant, only five sections are whole and the others broken. The
five unbroken sections would only cover a quarter of the roof (front façade).
The original cresting segments are 16” in length, 15” at the shorter height and 20 5/8” at the
highest point with a 3/16” thickness. The distance between each original cresting from
centerline to centerline is 8” apart. The French Quarter design option is 9.5” apart; the Cloisters
design option is 9.5” apart and the Cortez option is 11.9” apart.
Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications:
Secondary Buildings: Garages, Sheds, Other Outbuildings
A. Should be smaller in scale than the dwelling; clearly secondary in nature.
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 3 of 15
B. Should be simple in design but reflecting the general character of the associated
dwelling. For example, use gable roof forms if the dwelling has a gable roof, hipped roof forms
if the dwelling has a hipped roof etc.
C. Should be built at traditional locations for outbuildings in the locally designated districts.
These include at rear lot lines, adjacent to alleys, and at the back side of a dwelling;
D. Should be compatible in design, shape, materials, and roof shape to the associated
dwelling;
E. Should be of an exterior material to match the associated dwelling such as clapboard,
stucco, or brick. However, if not readily visible from the street, secondary buildings may have
exterior substitute siding materials such as cement fiber board with appropriate trim and
exposure and cementitious materials.
F. Should be of traditional materials if readily visible. For garages, wood paneled doors are
more appropriate than paneled doors of vinyl, aluminum, or steel. Wood paneled overhead
roll-up doors are widely available and are appropriate for new garages. For two car garages the
use of two single doors instead of one larger double door is more appropriate for use in a
historic district. However, one double is unacceptable for garages of less than twenty-two feet.
G. Should have windows in the garage doors are recommended, but windows may not be
appropriate in every case for garage doors.
H. Should have raised panel steel doors are acceptable and should be painted to match the
house and set off the relief of the panels.
I. Should be in designs that are more appropriate for use with traditionally designed
structures, if prefabricated sheds are proposed to be used.
J. Should not be constructed of rough sawn cedar with knots.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the request to construct the new garage if the following
conditions are met:
1. That the proposed garage siding material will be clear cedar (no knots) and installed
smooth side out in a profile and exposure to match the house’s existing wood siding. If
the property does not receive a Historic Rehabilitation Grant, then Fiber cement board
siding is also acceptable as the garage will be placed further back on the site and not
readily visible from the right-of-way.
2. That the siding and trim is to be painted a color to match or complement the existing
house colors.
3. That the garage roof shall be a 12:12 slope.
4. That the eaves shall be enclosed but not be boxed and shall extend a minimum of 12
inches away from the garage wall.
5. The frieze board shall be a minimum of 8” (not to exceed 10”). The frieze board shall be
painted.
6. Hinges on garage door design shall not be installed.
7. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee’s recommendati ons.
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 4 of 15
Staff recommends approval of the request to install Iron Roof Cresting if the following
conditions are met:
1. That the design chosen be one of the following:
a. The French Quarter 186-1 or 186-2: This design has similar design spacing of the
finials of the original cresting and the density is comparable.
b. The Cloisters: This design has similar design spacing of the finials found on the
original cresting, though it doesn’t have the complete density found in the
existing
c. The Cortez: This design appears to have closer spacing, and not as dense as the
original, however, the shape of the 5 pointed finial is similar to the original and
the arch between each finial also mimics the original.
2. That the thickness of the chosen design matches the original cresting’s thickness as
close as possible.
*****
John and Jenna Perrine (owners) were present for tonight’s COA discussion:
Preference for the French Quarter 186-1 design for the cresting. The proposed cresting will be
out of aluminum versus cast iron (material of the original cresting).
Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations.
The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter.
The motion passed unanimously.
John and Jenna Perrine were also present to discuss the construction of a 20’x20’ garage at the
rear of their property.
Conditions noted by staff were discussed. A 3” crown molding should be installed instead of the
1x2 drip edge as noted on the drawings. In addition, bed molding should be installed at the
frieze board and that the cedar siding shall have an exposure of 4 ½”.
Owners stated that they were agreeable to all conditions listed.
Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the
following requirements: 1) Cedar shall have an exposure of 4 ½”, 2) 3” crown molding installed
instead of the 1x2 drip edge at the fascia, 3) bed molding installed along frieze board.
The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond.
The motion passed unanimously.
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 5 of 15
63 Lincoln Avenue – Installation of Composite Fence
The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriat eness to
install a new composite fence along the west and east side yards.
The applicant is proposing to install a composite 3’-0” dog-eared fence, in the side yards. The
applicant indicated that they are interested in the composite fencing due to its durability. Staff
explained to the applicants that a composite fence has not been reviewed/assessed befo re for
a material as the traditional fence material approved in the districts has always been some type
of rot resistant wood or ornamental metal.
Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications:
Fences
A. Should be proportionate to the house and the design should be compatible with the
character of the building and district.
B. Should be painted white or a trim color related to the house, never left to weather or
given a stain finish.
C. Of cast iron or other material of original design should be preserved .
D. Of cast iron may be added to buildings constructed in the late 19th and early 20th
century. Cast iron fences are generally not appropriate for dwellings built after 1920.
E. If placed along common property lines should not be placed against another fence -
double line fencing is not permitted.
F. Should have posts that are set a minimum of 30 inches below grade and no more than
eight feet apart.
G. If wood, be of cedar, redwood or pressure treated pine, cypress or other rot resistant
wood.
H. That has a decorative gate or arbors must be submitted with a drawing complete with
dimensions.
Fences in Front Yards
I. Should be no higher than 36 inches with the posts being slightly higher and having caps
J. Should have pickets no wider than four inches with spacing between boards a minimum
of one inch up to the width of the board depending on the design of the fence.
K. If applicable to the layout, should have a minimum of corner posts end posts and gate
posts which are slightly taller than the fence and five to ten inches thick with a cap and
finial. Line posts can be visible and decorative to compliment the main posts or be
hidden behind the picket design. Fences which cross a driveway or walkway should
have gate posts. Gates should be designed to swing onto the private walkway or
driveway, not onto the public sidewalk.
Fences in Rear Yards
L. Built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of
the house.
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 6 of 15
M. Built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which
are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets.
N. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard
O. Of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller
than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide.
P. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the
historic districts. Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as
privacy fences.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff cannot recommend approval of the application as submitted, as the material, composite,
does not meet the requirements of the Elgin Design Guideline Manual for Landmarks and
Historic Districts.
If the material of the fence is approved as proposed, staff recommends that the Design Review
Subcommittee recommend the following.
1. The fencing shall be a maximum of 3’-0” high as specified
2. That the location of the fencing match what is indicated on the Plat of Survey.
*****
Megan Stewart (owner) was present for tonight’s COA discussion:
Preference for composite fencing due to its durability and its recycled use of materials.
Some commissioners expressed the proposed width of the picket (5 inches) was too wide and a
thinner picket around 3 ½ inches to 4 inches was more appropriate. The Commission stated
that they were not opposed to the use of the composite material but were mo re concerned of
the design/look of the wider picket.
The Commission asked the owner if she would be agreeable to narrowing the 5 inch dog eared
pickets to a smaller width. The owner stated that she was unsure if she wanted to go through
the work to make the picket smaller. The Commission gave her the option to table this request
until the next meeting where she can come back with a smaller picket width design, or attempt
to cut down one of the 5 inch pickets to show the Commission what the edges of the co mposite
picket would look like or to have the Commission review and make a motion on the initial
request of the 5 inch width picket.
She was agreeable to table the request until the next meeting.
Motion made by Committee Member Savel to table the request until the April 11, 2017 Design
Review Subcommittee meeting.
The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter.
The motion passed unanimously.
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 7 of 15
471 Arlington Ave – Rehabilitation of side porch
The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriatenes s (COA) to reconstruct the
property’s side porch. The COA application has been filed as a corrective action to the following
violations:
1. Side porch columns, decking and skirting removed without a COA.
The applicants noted that the side porch was in poor condition and started work as an
immediate action as one of the columns was beyond repair. They also noted that they were
unaware that they needed approval for this work.
In the process, they removed other deteriorated elements on the side porch. One column was
beyond repair and was disposed of, the other column was kept and is proposed to be
reinstalled. The applicants stated that they will be reinstalling a new column that matches the
details of the existing side porch column.
Side Porch Scope of Work
a. Reinstallation of historic column and installation of new column to match the
design of the existing columns, exactly.
b. Installation of 1x4 tongue and groove decking
c. Installation of historically appropriate balustrade to meet the historic district
guidelines
Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications:
Porches
A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing
B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and
placement
C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal
and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be
placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide
decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials.
D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood
floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick)
E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of
concrete (see section on Porch Steps).
F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the façade,
if the porch floor is made of wood.
G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate.
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 8 of 15
H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with
decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the
foundation exist.
I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling
J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the
porch’s open appearance.
Porch Columns and Railing
A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to
match the original in dimensions and detailing.
B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been
removed or replaced
C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called
spindles) should be appropriate for the building’s style and period. The height of the
railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30
inches in height.
Porch Staircases and Steps
A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the
property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the
original.
B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is
made of wood.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the
following conditions:
Side Porch
1. The original column that has been set aside shall be reinstalled closest to the street. The
replacement column shall match the existing column in design, size and material.
2. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, ¾” cove, 2x2 square,
decorative balusters to match existing in style, spaced no greater than 2.5 inches apart.
That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2” above finished floor.
3. The flooring shall be 1x4 tongue and groove and installed perpendicular to the house.
Pressure treated wood or composite material (recommended) is acceptable. Flooring shall
extend past the skirting frame no less than 1 inch and have beveled edges.
4. The porch skirting shall be constructed to match the existing skirting design on the front
porch. It shall be installed with care taken to ensure that the porch floor overhangs the
skirting frame board by no less than 1 inch.
5. All porch details shall be primed and painted.
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 9 of 15
*****
Juan and Marisela Jimenez (owners) were present for tonight’s COA discussion:
The applicants noted that they will be rebuilding their side porch to match elements from the
front porch and per staff’s recommendations.
The Commission had no comments as the proposed request met their specifications.
Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations.
The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond.
The motion passed unanimously.
14-16 S Chapel St – Replacement windows, rehabilitation of front porch
The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriat eness to restore or
replace the following:
1. Installation of new porch railing, fretwork, balusters and newel posts, addition of
handrails down the stairs, reconstruction of front stairs. The porch columns are to
remain.
2. Replacement of all windows on building with aluminum-clad wood windows.
Staff conducted a site visit on Wednesday, March 22nd and found that the existing windows are
in poor condition and beyond repair. Many of the windows are missing sashes and are boarded
up with plywood. The applicant noted that they will use the existing windows as a guide to get
as close to the existing measurements at the stiles, bottom, top and meeting rails.
Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications:
Porches
K. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing
L. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and
placement
M. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal
and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be
placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide
decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials.
N. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood
floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick)
O. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of
concrete (see section on Porch Steps).
P. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the façade,
if the porch floor is made of wood.
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 10 of 15
Q. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate.
R. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with
decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the
foundation exist.
S. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling
T. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the
porch’s open appearance.
Porch Columns and Railing
D. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to
match the original in dimensions and detailing.
E. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been
removed or replaced
F. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called
spindles) should be appropriate for the building’s style and period. The height of the
railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30
inches in height.
Windows
A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design
and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights).
B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades
where readily visible.
C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary, the
recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and
design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as
replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in
determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement
shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering,
loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and
cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may
be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the
windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate
replacement windows.
E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic dist ricts.
F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are
preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as
historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and
installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles.
G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit
within the window frames.
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 11 of 15
H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass
that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not
contain a tint should be used.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the
following conditions:
Porch
1. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, ¾” cove, 3x3 (nominal)
decorative balusters to match existing in style, with a maximum of 2.5” apart. That the
bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2” above finished floor.
2. That the stair treads shall 5/4” x 12 and bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a
minimum of 1”. Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When
using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with p orch/deck
enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated
preferable) to adhere board to framing.
3. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs and shall be 6x6 and to
match existing columns in design.
4. That the existing columns remain.
5. That the proposed fretwork matches the mockup design.
6. That skirting is added underneath the stairs, each side of stair stringer. A 1x4 bottom
board shall be installed 1 inch above grade with 1x4 vertical boards installed behind the
bottom board spaced 1 inch apart.
7. All front porch details shall match the attached drawing.
8. All front porch details shall be primed and painted.
Windows
8. That all windows shall be 1/1 double-hung, aluminum clad wood and must fit original
window openings with arched top.
9. The window replacements must match the profile of the original windows as close as
possible.
10. Window glass shall not be tinted.
*****
Kurt Kresmery (owner) was present for tonight’s COA discussion:
The applicant stated that they will also be painting the porch colors that borrow from the
original mosaic tiling at the porch.
Some commissioners expressed installation of a 5” – 5 ½” diameter full ball cap on the newel
posts rather than a flattened ball cap as shown in the drawings. In addition, with the use of
larger spindles (3x3), the bottom and top rail will need to be at least 4 ½” wide to accommodate
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 12 of 15
the cove molding and the spindle. In addition, the bottom rail shall have a routed 1x material
placed beneath the rail to give a thicker appearance.
The applicant agreed to those changes.
Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve with staff recommendations and
the following requirements: 1) Newel posts shall have a full ball cap (5” – 5 ½” diameter ball),
2) the top and bottom rails shall be at least 2” x 4 ½” to accommodate the 3x3 spindles, 3) the
bottom rail shall have a routed 1x material placed beneath the rail.
The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson.
The motion passed unanimously.
Kurt Kresmery (owner) also stated that he will be replacing all of the windows on the building
as the existing windows are beyond repair. The applicant also noted that they will be using
Casco windows that have an arched top on the square sash.
The only comment the commissioners noted is that modern brick mold is not to be installed but
to install flat stock trim to match what is on the building now.
The applicant agreed to that change.
Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the
following requirements: 1) Flat stock trim (that matches the existing) shall be installed. Modern
brick mold shall not be installed.
The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy.
The motion passed unanimously.
851 Brook Street – Construction of rear addition
The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness request for construction of an
addition at the back of the house. The addition will be an un-conditioned, sunporch.
The applicant noted that the existing windows on the home will not be removed and will
remain intact and that the only removal of original elements is the stoop. The stoop is original
to the home as it exists on the 1950 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, however, the columns a nd
the handrail at this location were likely installed at a later time. The home was built around
1925.
The home is located on the corner lot and therefore, the proposed addition located at the rear
will be visible from Slade Avenue but not from the main thoroughfare, Brook Street.
Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications:
Additions
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 13 of 15
A. should be located at the rear of dwellings, not on the front or readily visible areas of the
sides of dwellings.
B. should be secondary (smaller and simpler) than the o riginal dwelling in scale, design,
and placement.
C. should be of a compatible design in keeping with the original dwelling’s design, roof
shape, materials, color, and location of window, door, and cornice heights, etc.
D. should impact the exterior walls of the original dwelling as minimally as possible. When
building additions use existing door and window openings for connecting the addition to
the dwelling.
E. should be constructed to avoid extensive removal or loss of historic materials and to not
damage or destroy significant original architectural features
Demolition
A. should be located at the rear of dwellings, not on the front or readily visible areas of the
sides of dwellings.
B. should be secondary (smaller and simpler) than the original dwelling in scale, design,
and placement.
C. should be of a compatible design in keeping with the original dwelling’s design, roof
shape, materials, color, and location of window, door, and cornice heights, etc.
D. should impact the exterior walls of the original dwelling as minimally as possible. When
building additions use existing door and window openings for connecting the addition to
the dwelling.
E. should be constructed to avoid extensive removal or loss of historic materials and to not
damage or destroy significant original architectural features.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff would recommend approval for each COA request as follows and with the following
conditions:
Rear/Sunroom Addition:
1. That the existing windows on the home shall remain and not be removed.
2. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, ¾” cove, 2 ”x2” square,
balusters with a maximum of 2.5” on center. That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with
chamfered edges, installed 2” above finished floor. The handrail/guardrail height shall
meet the minimum required handrail height per code at 34” high from the decking. The
handrail and guardrail height may be reduced to 30” as the property is located within
the Historic District, upon receipt of a signed Handrail Height Waiver form by owner.
3. The stair treads shall be 5/4” x 10 bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the riser a
minimum of 1”. Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using
pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side to deter any future cupping
of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable) to adhere board to
framing.
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 14 of 15
4. The skirting shall have a 1x8 top rimboard with 1x8 corner boards and a 1x4 bottom
rimboard. The vertical skirting boards shall be a 1x4 board spaced 1 inch apart and
installed behind the bottom and top rimboards.
5. The flooring at the stairs shall be 1x4 tongue and groove, installed perpendicular to the
house and extend past the skirting’s top rimboard by at least 1 inch. Pressure treated
wood or composite material (recommended) is acceptable.
6. All other details shall match the drawings.
7. All elements shall be primed and painted.
*****
Michael and Debbie Donahoe (owners) were present for tonight’s COA discussion:
The owners presented samples of the brick and limestone veneer to be installed along the
foundation of the proposed screened in porch. They gave preference to the limestone veneer
as it borrows from the limestone material that is found throughout the exterior.
The commissioners stated that the limestone veneer is appropriate as it nicely ties in with the
home’s existing limestone and that it differentiates that new addition from the historic home.
The commissioners also stated that the cedar trim should be installed smooth side out and that
the porch ceiling shall not be the proposed T1-11 panels but should be of a traditional
beadboard design. They suggested ½” to ¾” thickness ply-bead panels that give the appearance
of beadboard but come in 4’x8’ sheets.
The applicants agreed to those changes.
Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the
following requirements: 1) cedar trim shall be installed smooth side out 2) the porch ceiling
shall give the appearance of beadboard with the installation of a ½” to ¾” ply-bead panel. The
T1-11 ceiling shall be replaced with a simulated beadboard ceiling.
The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson.
The motion passed unanimously.
ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS:
Staff stated that grants are due on Friday, March 31st and that she has received six
applications so far.
Staff handed out Preservation Month Brochures to the Commissioners.
CORRESPONDENCE:
None
ADJOURNMENT:
Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Diamond.
Design Review Subcommittee – March 28, 2017
Page 15 of 15
The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel.
The motion passed unanimously.
The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 7:19 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Christen Sundquist
Community Development Department Approved: