Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017 DRSC Agendas and Minutes Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee rik Tuesday,January 10, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. December 13, 2016 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business F. New Business G. Other 1. Renewal by Anderson Representative Steve Gilliana; Patrick Dailey and Steve Zwemke H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616} PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission January 10, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter,John Roberson, Dennis Roxworthy, Scott Savel, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Ristow CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation APPROVAL OF MINUTES: rMotion made by Committee Member Diamond to approve the minutes of December 13, 2016, as amended (correction of words within report on page 3 last paragraph, "addresses" to "addressed" and "...with a building permit"to "without a building permit." The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: Steve Gilliana, Patrick Dailey, Gary Krumsee PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business None ITEMS TABLED: None r Design Review Subcommittee—January 10, 2017 Page 2 of 3 NEW BUSINESS: None OTHER: Renewal by Anderson Representatives, Steve Gilliana, Patrick Dailey and Gary Krumsee were in attendance to seek approval of their window product, Renewal,to be used in Elgin's Historic Districts and Landmarks. The product has been on the market since 1995 and proposes an alternative to wood, aluminum-clad wood and vinyl windows. The material of the product is called Fibrex, which includes a combination of wood fiber and polymers. The representatives went over the benefits of this product and compared it to other products such as aluminum- clad wood and vinyl windows. A sample window was brought before the Commission to review sizes. It was noted that this product can be an insert window, which will allow the exterior trim, and in most cases,the interior trim to be left in place. The Commission agreed that this was one of their main concerns. It was also noted by the representative, Steve Gilliana, that this product has been approved by Evanston's Preservation Commission as well as Oak Park's Preservation Commission. The stiles (vertical part of sash) and the top and bottom rail size were comparable in size to a historic window, however the meeting rail was larger (2 %") than what would be seen on a historic window(1 W) and raised some concern with the Committee members. The Commission agreed that the proposed smaller muntin bars (3/4") were accurate and were comfortable with that size for a replacement window. The Committee members asked for a list of historic (over 50 years old) homes, that are not in the historic districts, that have had this window installed in Elgin to see if the meeting rail detracts from the overall design of the historic home. The representatives agreed to forward that list to Staff who will then forward it on to the Commissioners. A decision to allow this product was not made at this meeting as it will go before the Heritage Commission to review once more evidence has been presented. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: Staff noted that they have begun to advertise for the Historic Rehabilitation Grants, which will be due on Friday, March 31, 2017. There will be a Historic Rehabilitation Grant Workshop on Monday, February 6th from 6:00-8:OOPM at the Gail Borden Public Library—Community Room A. CORRESPONDENCE: None r ' Design Review Subcommittee—January 10, 2017 Page 3 of 3 ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Savel. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 7:43 p.m. Respectfully submitted, 0114:4441' (5)1P1216 Christen Sundquist Approved: Historic Preservation Planner r r Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, February 14, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. January 10, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business F. New Business 1. 344 St. Charles Street—2017 Grant Applicant- Rehabilitation of front porch to eik match historic photograph; reconstruction of side porch to borrow elements from front porch; replacement of basement windows to match existing in kind 2. 270 Lessenden PI—2017 Grant Applicant- Installation of new garage G. Other 1. Renewal By Anderson—Window Discussion 2. Half-Round and K-style gutter discussion H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616} PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. C • r Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission February 14, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter,John Roberson, Dennis Roxworthy, Scott Savel, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Ristow CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary r APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve the minutes of January 10, 2017, as submitted The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 1. 344 St. Charles Street—2017 Grant Applicant- Rehabilitation of front porch to match historic photograph; reconstruction of side porch to borrow elements from front porch; replacement of basement windows to match existing in kind 2. 270 Lessenden PI—2017 Grant Applicant- Installation of new garage ITEMS TABLED: None r Design Review Subcommittee—February 14, 2017 Page 2 of 8 NEW BUSINESS: 344 St Charles Street- Rehabilitation of front porch and side porch The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the following: 1. Restoration of front, wrap around porch including: a. Removal of existing flooring and replacement with 1x4 tongue and groove; b. Installation of handrails and balusters to match historic photograph—harp sawn balusters; c. Reconstruction of front stairs to be wood with beveled edges d. Deteriorated/split columns to be replaced with wood columns to match original, other columns to be restored; e. Installation of one pipe rail at front stairs—painted black 2. Reconstruction of southwest porch including replacement of wood stairs, harp sawn balusters, newel posts and skirting to match elements found on front porch. To note, the applicant will also be scraping and painting the entire home, restoring the existing windows, spot replacement of deteriorated wood and replacement of the basement windows to match the existing in size, material and profile. These requests were approved by staff. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Design Review Subcommittee—February 14, 2017 Page 3 of 8 Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period. The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber. The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. Should have newel posts and balusters, treads and risers, to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the application as submitted with the following recommendations. 1. Rehabilitation of front porch to match the historic photograph. a) That the decorative porch elements shall be restored rather than replaced. Elements beyond repair, shall follow conditions below. b) The handrail shall have a 2" x 4" top rail with chamfered edges, %" cove, 2" square harp shaped balusters to match historic photograph, with a maximum of 2%2" a part. That the bottom rail is a 2" x 4" with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. Balustrade shall be installed at existing location c) That the stair treads shall 5/4" x 12 (recommended) bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable) to adhere board to framing. d) That metal, tube handrail to be installed on one side of front porch stairs—painted black to be minimally seen —not to detract existing porch elements. e) The flooring shall be 1x4 tongue and groove and installed perpendicular to the house. Pressure treated wood or composite material (recommended) is acceptable. f) Porch columns that are beyond repair shall match the existing in kind (size, design, material, etc.) g) Skirting boards may be spot replaced if in deteriorated condition. New skirting boards shall match the existing in material, and size h) All front porch details shall be primed and painted. _ Design Review Subcommittee—February 14, 2017 Page4of8 N 2. Rehabilitation of side porch to match details on front porch a) The handrail shall have a 2" x 4"top rail with chamfered edges, %" cove, 2" square harp shaped balusters to match existing in style, with a maximum of 2 %" a part. That the bottom rail is a 2" x 4" with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. b) That the stair treads shall 5/4" x 12 (recommended) bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable)to adhere board to framing. c) That the newel posts added to the bottom of the stairs d) That the newel posts shall be 6x6 square, with an inset panel on 3 exposed sides,topped with a beveled edge newel post cap. e) The flooring shall be 1x4 tongue and groove and installed perpendicular to the house. Pressure treated wood or composite material (recommended) is acceptable. f) The porch skirting may be reconstructed as proposed with care taken to ensure that the porch floor overhangs the skirting frame board by no less than 1 inch. g) The porch skirting shall match the front porch skirting in design and size including 1x6 top rimboard with 1x4 vertical skirting boards placed behind the top and bottom rimboard, spaced 1 inch apart and a 1x4 bottom rimboard installed 1 inch above grade. 1x8 vertical frame boards shall be installed beneath newel posts and be flush with the top and bottom rimboards. h) All front porch details shall be primed and painted. Juan Rodriquez (owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Columns appear to be 10" tapered. Handrail required on one side. Based on local weather it makes sense to have handrails on both sides. No photo evidence of handrails on front of house. Spacing should only be with of the baluster. "Harp" style baluster should be 1 '4" top/bottom, with the "harp" being 2" in width. The "harp" style baluster does not necessarily need to be on the staircase handrail. A straight (standard 2x2 spindle)for baluster would be more appropriate design on the staircase. Front handrail (from the column) needs to be extend parallel to the steps,then angled at 90 degrees to go down the staircase to the newel post. Newel post should be cut from top of tapered column, with a standard details for a 5 1/2-6" ball cap. Homeowner would prefer wood railing for both handrail systems. Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve with staff recommendations and the following amendments: 1) front porch handrails to be attached to brick (90 degree angle out,then down to post), 2) Round newel post on front stairs with 5 1/2" round ball cap and 3/4" cove molding, 3) column details to match existing- including rings cap and base, 4) 2x2 square balusters at the stairs, 5) 1 % x 2 harp baluster design at the porch balustrade, Design Review Subcommittee—February 14, 2017 Page 5 of 8 6) standard hand and bottom rail with cove molding, 7) side porch flooring to be installed perpendicular to the long side of house constructed of tongue and groove (PVC or composite) or 5/4 treated lumber with 1/8" spacing. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. 270 Lessenden PI—Installation of new garage The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new garage on the property. Prior to the current owner buying the property, the Fox River Water Reclamation District owned the property with plans on full demolition as part of a larger plan to develop this project. On April 23, 2013, the Design Review Subcommittee approved demolition of the rear garage due to severe deterioration. Per the noted COA requirements, "In the event the principal building on the property is not demolished, the property owner will be required to construct a garage (minimum 1-car) on the property in accordance with the Elgin Design Guideline Manual for Landmarks and Historic Districts and building and zoning codes." The current owner will be proposing a 24x24 garage that will be located towards the rear of the property near the location of the previous garage. The new garage will include the following: wood frame construction with brick veneer (brick to match the color and size of the brick on the existing home), side gabled roof with clipped gable ends with front dormer to be of similar design as on the existing home; a raised paneled overhead door, and paneled service door. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Secondary Buildings: Garages, Sheds, Other Outbuildings A. Should be smaller in scale than the dwelling; clearly secondary in nature. B. Should be simple in design but reflecting the general character of the associated dwelling. For example, use gable roof forms if the dwelling has a gable roof, hipped roof forms if the dwelling has a hipped roof etc. C. Should be built at traditional locations for outbuildings in the locally designated districts. These include at rear lot lines, adjacent to alleys, and at the back side of a dwelling; D. Should be compatible in design, shape, materials, and roof shape to the associated dwelling; E. Should be of an exterior material to match the associated dwelling such as clapboard, stucco, or brick. However, if not readily visible from the street, secondary buildings may have exterior substitute siding materials such as cement fiber board with appropriate trim and exposure and cementitious materials. F. Should be of traditional materials if readily visible. For garages, wood paneled doors are more appropriate than paneled doors of vinyl, aluminum, or steel. Wood paneled overhead roll-up doors are widely available and are appropriate for new garages. For two car garages the Design Review Subcommittee—February 14, 2017 Page 6 of 8 use of two single doors instead of one larger double door is more appropriate for use in a historic district. However, one double is unacceptable for garages of less than twenty-two feet. G. Should have windows in the garage doors are recommended, but windows may not be appropriate in every case for garage doors. H. Should have raised panel steel doors are acceptable and should be painted to match the house and set off the relief of the panels. I. Should be in designs that are more appropriate for use with traditionally designed structures, if prefabricated sheds are proposed to be used. J. Should not be constructed of rough sawn cedar with knots. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request to construct the new garage if the following conditions are met: 1. That the proposed design of the garage is simpler in design as seen at 320 Fulton Street. The front elevation would be turned 90 degrees with the clipped gable end facing the street. 2. That the proposed garage siding material will be brick veneer to match the brick size and color on existing home with cedar clapboards (smooth, no knots) installed at the gable ends. 3. That the trim is to be painted a color to match or complement the existing house colors. 4. That the garage roof matches the house in slope, form and design. The gables shall have a cornice roof returns and crown molding shall be installed to run along the fascia board and rake fascia. Soffits to be 1x2 beadboard to match soffits on existing home. 5. That the garage doors (2) shall be raised panel with 1x4 vertical trim, 1x8 header casing with drip cap. 6. That the garage pedestrian door shall be in a craftsman style. 7. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. If the submitted requested garage is approved, staff recommends that the Design Review Subcommittee recommend the following: 1. That the proposed garage siding material will be brick veneer to match the brick size and color on existing home with cedar clapboards (smooth, no knots) installed at the gable ends. 2. That the trim is to be painted a color to match or complement the existing house colors. 3. That the garage roof matches the house in slope, form and design. Crown molding shall be installed to run along the fascia board and rake fascia. Soffits to be 1x2 beadboard to match soffits on existing home. 4. That the garage doors (2) shall be raised panel with 1x4 vertical trim, 1x8 header casing with drip cap. 5. That the garage pedestrian door shall be in a craftsman style. 6. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Michael Kinsella (owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion: _ Garage plan presented by owner was G06003, which has an image of a "clipped" roof design. Design Review Subcommittee—February 14, 2017 Page 7 of 8 Single garage door with raised panel, without windows. Commission mentioned a house a 110 Slade Avenue which has a single overhead garage door that simulates two hinged sliding style doors. Commission indicated a "veneer brick" (not full brick) would be allowed. Mortar joints should match the house in dimension and color. Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) garage style G06003 (without front dormer) with brick veneer all around the garage up to the soffits 2) panel overhead door with or without windows, 3) man/service door to be 6 panel constructed of either steel or wood, 4) add crown molding to fascia board and 5) mortar joint to match house. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. OTHER: 1. Renewal By Anderson—Window Discussion Commissioners agreed the window installation seems to have been done poorly on 5 of the 6 houses provided for committee review. Several problems noted: a. Dividers between the double hung windows. Spacing is wrong. b. Brick molding should not be sitting proud of the windows. c. No full screens d. Two locks for each window. Older window style is only one lock Additional comments: a. If house/building is significant, the size would have to match EXACTLY. b. Such windows should not be eligible for grant funds. c. Without consistent quality installation and details, this window should not be allowed within any historic districts nor landmark properties. 2. Half-Round and K-style gutter discussion a. K-style is only for flat, plum fascia boards per guidelines b. Mechanically, '/ rounds work as well as k-style gutters ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: Historic Rehabilitation Grants Workshop was held on Monday, February 6th. Several new attendees. Grant applications will be due on Friday, March 31, 2017. Possible need for DRSC meeting on February 28th, due to COA's for potential grant applications. CORRESPONDENCE: None Design Review Subcommittee—February 14, 2017 Page8of8 ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Diamond. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Cindy A. Waif, Approve : Design Rev.- Subcommittee Secretary �3/ �7 Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, March 14, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. February 14, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business F. New Business 1. 920 Brook Street—Installation of horizontal slat fence 2. 820 N. Spring Street—removal of pool, while retaining a portion of the existing deck installing appropriate guardrail that uses elements of the house's style 3. 355 Richert Court—Installation of new windows to match historic photograph G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616} PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. f Design Review Subcommittee r"' of the Elgin Heritage Commission March 14, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Rebecca Hunter,John Roberson, Dennis Roxworthy, Scott Savel, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynne Diamond and Bill Ristow CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: No minutes were presented for consideration. p RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 1. 920 Brook Street—Installation of horizontal slat fence 2. 820 N Spring Street—removal of pool, while retaining a portion of the existing deck installing appropriate guardrail that uses elements of the house's style 3. 355 Richert Court—Installation of new windows to match historic photograph ITEMS TABLED: None r Design Review Subcommittee—March 14, 2017 Page2of6 NEW BUSINESS: 920 Brook Street— Installation of horizontal slat fence The property owner has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to install a new horizontal slat fence at the rear of the property. In reviewing the trend of fences in the area, staff has not seen a horizontal slat fence installed. However, the Design Review Subcommittee has approved the installation of a split-rail fence (2- rail) 36"high at 851 N. Grove Avenue on October 23, 2014 which is of similar style and age as 920 Brook Street. In addition, staff and the applicant have provided fence designs associated with 1950s style homes found in the Aladdin Company Plan Book and additional research. These fence found in this plan book show horizontal slat designs. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Fences A. Should be proportionate to the house and the design should be compatible with the character of the building and district. B. Should be painted white or a trim color related to the house, never left to weather or given a stain finish. E. If placed along common property lines should not be placed against another fence - double line fencing is not permitted... F. Should have posts that are set a minimum of 30 inches below grade and no more than eight feet apart. G. If wood, be of cedar, redwood or pressure treated pine, cypress or other rot resistant wood. Fences in Rear Yard L. Built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. M. Built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. N. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard. 0. Of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. P. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the historic districts. Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval as submitted since a horizontal slat fence does not meet the requirements of the Elgin Design Guideline Manual for Landmarks and Historic Districts. However, given the age of the home, 1954, and its non-contributing status, the Design Review Subcommittee may decide to recommend and approve as proposed as the fence will be • Design Review Subcommittee—March 14, 2017 Page 3 of 6 minimally visible from the public way and that there is evidence that horizontal slat fences were installed with this style and age of home. Staff would then recommend that the Design Review Subcommittee recommend that landscape material (shrubs including evergreens for year-round screening)be planted in front of the visible (from the public way) portions of the fence to screen it and that the fence shall be painted a complimentary color to the home or a solid-body stain. Alex Fiebig(owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion: Preference for the horizontal fence due to style of home. House is a typical 1950's ranch style. Homeowner is wanting provide both privacy and ability to keep the family pets in the rear yard. Typography issues on site, including steep grade from drive to rear lot line. A wheeled gate across driveway will have a spring system to support the weight of the gate panels for easy opening and closing. Wide horizontal wood fence can be seen on the corner of Douglas and Summit. Commission recommended a maximum driveway gate height of 4 feet. Remainder of fencing okay for 5 feet height from grade, constructed of 1x6 boards with 1.5" separation between the slates. Homeowner would like to tier the height with the grade, instead by having the fence look like it is a "rolling knoll". Landscaping near the northern property line with shrubs to obscure visibility from street view is not required, due to the typography and setback from the street. Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve as amended: 1) boards to be 1x6, 2) spacing between horizontal boards to be 1.5", 3) fence height at 5 feet (to be tiered as needed due to grade), 4)gate height at 4 feet, and 5) solid body/stain to be applied. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. 850 N Spring Street—removal of pool,while retaining a portion of the existing deck installing appropriate guardrail that uses elements of the house's style The property owner has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to remove the existing pool and part of the existing deck. The remaining deck will be improved to include specifications that match the style of the home. To note,the 24'x12' above ground pool was installed in 2001. Per the Historic District Guidelines, pools should be located in rear or side yards and screened from street view by fencing or landscaping. Design Review Subcommittee—March 14, 2017 Page 4 of 6 Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Decks A. Should be located at the rear of dwellings only, where they are not readily visible from the street B. Should be stained with an opaque stain or painted to blend with the colors of the dwelling C. Should be kept simple in design. Wood decks are recommended to have traditional style wood balusters complementary to the design of the building. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, 3/" cove, 2x2 square, decorative balusters to match existing in style, with a maximum of 2.5" apart. That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. 2. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs. 3. That the newel posts shall be 6x6 with pyramidal cap. 4. That all other details match the attached drawing. 5. All decking details shall be stained with an opaque stain or primed and painted a complimentary color to the existing home. Walter Hegel (owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion: Preference for the 10' x 14' deck floor plan. Staircase would be installed along the west side of the deck. Some commissioners expressed turned spindle (similar to front porch) should be used for the balustrade. Standard 3x3 turned spindles (2 '/<" x 2 '4" actual) are available as stock item at the local hardware/lumber stores. Posts can be wrapped 4x4 or solid 6x6. Illustrations indicate off center newel posts on north elevation. A total of three (3) posts only northern side of deck should be install; one on each corner, with the third post on center. Dry decking boards should with 1/8" spacing. If boards are "green/wet", they should be installed butted together since the spacing will naturally occur as they dry out. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) 10'x14' deck foot print, 2) three newel posts along north elevation with middle post on center, 3) 5/4 decking with 1/8" spacing, 4) decking to be perpendicular to the long wall, and 5) balusters options a-turned 3x3 (preferred) or b-2x2 square balusters (edges are not to be rounded). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. - Design Review Subcommittee—March 14, 2017 Page 5 of 6 355 Richert Court— Installation of new windows to match historic photograph The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness request for the replacement windows due to issues with energy efficiency (air infiltration). The applicant proposed to replace five windows install aluminum clad wood, double-hung, 3/1 windows. The existing windows to be replaced are not original to the home. The applicant will be installing double-hung windows that match the current design and configuration found in the historic photograph while matching profiles and stile and rail sizes of the existing, original windows found on the northwest elevation (foyer). Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary, the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. That all windows shall be 3/1 double-hung, aluminum clad wood and must fit original window openings. 2. Trim and sill profiles shall be recreated using measurements from the existing, original windows found at the northwest corner of the home. Design Review Subcommittee—March 14, 2017 r Page 5 of 6 355 Richert Court— Installation of new windows to match historic photograph The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness request for the replacement windows due to issues with energy efficiency (air infiltration). The applicant proposed to replace five windows install aluminum clad wood, double-hung, 3/1 windows. The existing windows to be replaced are not original to the home. The applicant will be installing double-hung windows that match the current design and configuration found in the historic photograph while matching profiles and stile and rail sizes of the existing, original windows found on the northwest elevation (foyer). Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary, the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. That all windows shall be 3/1 double-hung, aluminum clad wood and must fit original window openings. 2. Trim and sill profiles shall be recreated using measurements from the existing, original windows found at the northwest corner of the home. Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, March 28, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. February 14, 2017 2. March 14, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business F. New Business 1. 259 Villa Street—Grant Application: Construction of garage and installation/recreation of cresting 2. 63 Lincoln Avenue— Installation of Composite Fence 3. 471 Arlington Ave— Rehabilitation of side porch 4. 14-16 S Chapel St— Replacement windows, rehabilitation of front porch 5. 851 Brook Street—Construction of rear addition G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616} PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. r Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission March 28, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter, John Roberson, Dennis Roxworthy, Scott Savel, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Ristow CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve the minutes of February 14, 2017, as amended (correction of statements within report on page 4 last paragraph, "2x2 square balusters"to "2x2 square balusters at the stairs" and "...11/2" x2 harp baluster design" to "...11/2" x2 harp baluster design at the porch balustrade." Correction of statements on page 7 top of the page, "...a single garage door"to "...a single overhead garage door" and "...two overhead doors" to "two hinged sliding style doors" On the same page, third paragraph, "...brick veneer on corners" to "...brick veneer all around the garage up to the soffits," and "...flat overhead door" to "...panel overhead door." The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve the minutes of March 14, 2017, as amended (correction of statement within report on page 4, 4th paragraph, "2.5 x 2.5 actual"to "2.25 x 2.25 actual." The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed 6-0-1 (Diamond abstained). RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: Dan and Pat Miller;John Marston r Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 2 of 15 PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 1. 259 Villa Street—Grant Application: Construction of garage and installation/recreation of cresting 2. 63 Lincoln Avenue —Installation of Composite Fence 3. 471 Arlington Ave—Rehabilitation of side porch 4. 14-16 S Chapel St—Replacement windows, rehabilitation of front porch 5. 851 Brook Street—Construction of rear addition ITEMS TABLED: None NEW BUSINESS: 259 Villa Street—Grant Application: Construction of garage and installation/recreation of cresting The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new garage on the property (previous garage demolished in 2015 without a COA/Permit by prior owners). The proposed 20' x 20' garage will be located towards the rear of the property in the location of the previous garage that was demolished in 2015 and includes the following: wood frame construction, smooth cedar cladding—no knots, gabled roof with a 12:12 pitch, one paneled overhead door, and paneled service door. Additionally, staff has obtained information on the details of the trim corner boards, casings and the garage door. The garage will be installed on the existing concrete foundation of the previous garage. The application has also submitted a COA to install metal cresting that is of a similar design to the original. The original was damaged and removed by a previous owner and is in fair to poor condition. As noted by the applicant, only five sections are whole and the others broken. The five unbroken sections would only cover a quarter of the roof(front façade). The original cresting segments are 16" in length, 15" at the shorter height and 20 5/8" at the highest point with a 3/16" thickness. The distance between each original cresting from centerline to centerline is 8" apart. The French Quarter design option is 9.5" apart; the Cloisters design option is 9.5" apart and the Cortez option is 11.9" apart. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Secondary Buildings: Garages, Sheds, Other Outbuildings ""'' A. Should be smaller in scale than the dwelling; clearly secondary in nature. Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 3 of 15 B. Should be simple in design but reflecting the general character of the associated dwelling. For example, use gable roof forms if the dwelling has a gable roof, hipped roof forms if the dwelling has a hipped roof etc. C. Should be built at traditional locations for outbuildings in the locally designated districts. These include at rear lot lines, adjacent to alleys, and at the back side of a dwelling; D. Should be compatible in design, shape, materials, and roof shape to the associated dwelling; E. Should be of an exterior material to match the associated dwelling such as clapboard, stucco, or brick. However, if not readily visible from the street, secondary buildings may have exterior substitute siding materials such as cement fiber board with appropriate trim and exposure and cementitious materials. F. Should be of traditional materials if readily visible. For garages, wood paneled doors are more appropriate than paneled doors of vinyl, aluminum, or steel. Wood paneled overhead roll-up doors are widely available and are appropriate for new garages. For two car garages the use of two single doors instead of one larger double door is more appropriate for use in a historic district. However, one double is unacceptable for garages of less than twenty-two feet. G. Should have windows in the garage doors are recommended, but windows may not be appropriate in every case for garage doors. H. Should have raised panel steel doors are acceptable and should be painted to match the house and set off the relief of the panels. I. Should be in designs that are more appropriate for use with traditionally designed structures, if prefabricated sheds are proposed to be used. J. Should not be constructed of rough sawn cedar with knots. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request to construct the new garage if the following conditions are met: 1. That the proposed garage siding material will be clear cedar (no knots) and installed smooth side out in a profile and exposure to match the house's existing wood siding. If the property does not receive a Historic Rehabilitation Grant, then Fiber cement board siding is also acceptable as the garage will be placed further back on the site and not readily visible from the right-of-way. 2. That the siding and trim is to be painted a color to match or complement the existing house colors. 3. That the garage roof shall be a 12:12 slope. 4. That the eaves shall be enclosed but not be boxed and shall extend a minimum of 12 inches away from the garage wall. 5. The frieze board shall be a minimum of 8" (not to exceed 10"). The frieze board shall be painted. 6. Hinges on garage door design shall not be installed. 7. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. r Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 4 of 15 Staff recommends approval of the request to install Iron Roof Cresting if the following conditions are met: 1. That the design chosen be one of the following: a. The French Quarter 186-1 or 186-2:This design has similar design spacing of the finials of the original cresting and the density is comparable. b. The Cloisters:This design has similar design spacing of the finials found on the original cresting,though it doesn't have the complete density found in the existing c. The Cortez:This design appears to have closer spacing, and not as dense as the original, however,the shape of the 5 pointed finial is similar to the original and the arch between each finial also mimics the original. 2. That the thickness of the chosen design matches the original cresting's thickness as close as possible. John and Jenna Perrine (owners) were present for tonight's COA discussion: Preference for the French Quarter 186-1 design for the cresting. The proposed cresting will be out of aluminum versus cast iron (material of the original cresting). Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. John and Jenna Perrine were also present to discuss the construction of a 20'x20' garage at the rear of their property. Conditions noted by staff were discussed. A 3" crown molding should be installed instead of the 1x2 drip edge as noted on the drawings. In addition, bed molding should be installed at the frieze board and that the cedar siding shall have an exposure of 4'". Owners stated that they were agreeable to all conditions listed. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) Cedar shall have an exposure of 4%", 2) 3" crown molding installed instead of the 1x2 drip edge at the fascia, 3) bed molding installed along frieze board. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond. The motion passed unanimously. r Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 5 of 15 63 Lincoln Avenue—Installation of Composite Fence The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a new composite fence along the west and east side yards. The applicant is proposing to install a composite 3'-0" dog-eared fence, in the side yards. The applicant indicated that they are interested in the composite fencing due to its durability. Staff explained to the applicants that a composite fence has not been reviewed/assessed before for a material as the traditional fence material approved in the districts has always been some type of rot resistant wood or ornamental metal. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Fences A. Should be proportionate to the house and the design should be compatible with the character of the building and district. B. Should be painted white or a trim color related to the house, never left to weather or given a stain finish. C. Of cast iron or other material of original design should be preserved. D. Of cast iron may be added to buildings constructed in the late 19th and early 20th century. Cast iron fences are generally not appropriate for dwellings built after 1920. E. If placed along common property lines should not be placed against another fence - double line fencing is not permitted. F. Should have posts that are set a minimum of 30 inches below grade and no more than eight feet apart. G. If wood, be of cedar, redwood or pressure treated pine, cypress or other rot resistant wood. H. That has a decorative gate or arbors must be submitted with a drawing complete with dimensions. Fences in Front Yards I. Should be no higher than 36 inches with the posts being slightly higher and having caps J. Should have pickets no wider than four inches with spacing between boards a minimum of one inch up to the width of the board depending on the design of the fence. K. If applicable to the layout, should have a minimum of corner posts end posts and gate posts which are slightly taller than the fence and five to ten inches thick with a cap and finial. Line posts can be visible and decorative to compliment the main posts or be hidden behind the picket design. Fences which cross a driveway or walkway should have gate posts. Gates should be designed to swing onto the private walkway or driveway, not onto the public sidewalk. Fences in Rear Yards L. Built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. r Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 6 of 15 rM. Built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. N. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard 0. Of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. P. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the historic districts. Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval of the application as submitted, as the material, composite, does not meet the requirements of the Elgin Design Guideline Manual for Landmarks and Historic Districts. If the material of the fence is approved as proposed, staff recommends that the Design Review Subcommittee recommend the following. 1. The fencing shall be a maximum of 3'-0" high as specified 2. That the location of the fencing match what is indicated on the Plat of Survey. Megan Stewart (owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Preference for composite fencing due to its durability and its recycled use of materials. Some commissioners expressed the proposed width of the picket (5 inches) was too wide and a thinner picket around 3 % inches to 4 inches was more appropriate. The Commission stated that they were not opposed to the use of the composite material but were more concerned of the design/look of the wider picket. The Commission asked the owner if she would be agreeable to narrowing the 5 inch dog eared pickets to a smaller width. The owner stated that she was unsure if she wanted to go through the work to make the picket smaller. The Commission gave her the option to table this request until the next meeting where she can come back with a smaller picket width design, or attempt to cut down one of the 5 inch pickets to show the Commission what the edges of the composite picket would look like or to have the Commission review and make a motion on the initial request of the 5 inch width picket. She was agreeable to table the request until the next meeting. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to table the request until the April 11, 2017 Design Review Subcommittee meeting. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. r Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 7 of 15 r 471 Arlington Ave— Rehabilitation of side porch The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to reconstruct the property's side porch. The COA application has been filed as a corrective action to the following violations: 1. Side porch columns, decking and skirting removed without a COA. The applicants noted that the side porch was in poor condition and started work as an immediate action as one of the columns was beyond repair. They also noted that they were unaware that they needed approval for this work. In the process,they removed other deteriorated elements on the side porch. One column was beyond repair and was disposed of,the other column was kept and is proposed to be reinstalled.The applicants stated that they will be reinstalling a new column that matches the details of the existing side porch column. Side Porch Scope of Work a. Reinstallation of historic column and installation of new column to match the design of the existing columns, exactly. b. Installation of 1x4 tongue and groove decking c. Installation of historically appropriate balustrade to meet the historic district guidelines Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the façade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. r Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 8 of 15 H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period. The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Side Porch 1. The original column that has been set aside shall be reinstalled closest to the street. The replacement column shall match the existing column in design, size and material. 2. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, %" cove, 2x2 square, decorative balusters to match existing in style, spaced no greater than 2.5 inches apart. That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. 3. The flooring shall be 1x4 tongue and groove and installed perpendicular to the house. Pressure treated wood or composite material (recommended) is acceptable. Flooring shall extend past the skirting frame no less than 1 inch and have beveled edges. 4. The porch skirting shall be constructed to match the existing skirting design on the front porch. It shall be installed with care taken to ensure that the porch floor overhangs the skirting frame board by no less than 1 inch. 5. All porch details shall be primed and painted. f Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 9 of 15 Juan and Marisela Jimenez (owners)were present for tonight's COA discussion: The applicants noted that they will be rebuilding their side porch to match elements from the front porch and per staff's recommendations. The Commission had no comments as the proposed request met their specifications. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond. The motion passed unanimously. 14-16 S Chapel St— Replacement windows, rehabilitation of front porch The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to restore or replace the following: 1. Installation of new porch railing, fretwork, balusters and newel posts, addition of handrails down the stairs, reconstruction of front stairs. The porch columns are to remain. 2. Replacement of all windows on building with aluminum-clad wood windows. Staff conducted a site visit on Wednesday, March 22nd and found that the existing windows are in poor condition and beyond repair. Many of the windows are missing sashes and are boarded up with plywood. The applicant noted that they will use the existing windows as a guide to get as close to the existing measurements at the stiles, bottom, top and meeting rails. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches K. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing L. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement M. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. N. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) O. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). P. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the façade, if the porch floor is made of wood. Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 10 of 15 Q. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. R. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. S. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling T. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing D. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. E. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced F. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period. The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. r Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 11 of 15 H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Porch 1. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, %" cove, 3x3 (nominal) decorative balusters to match existing in style, with a maximum of 2.5" apart. That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. 2. That the stair treads shall 5/4" x 12 and bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable) to adhere board to framing. 3. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs and shall be 6x6 and to match existing columns in design. 4. That the existing columns remain. 5. That the proposed fretwork matches the mockup design. 6. That skirting is added underneath the stairs, each side of stair stringer. A 1x4 bottom board shall be installed 1 inch above grade with 1x4 vertical boards installed behind the bottom board spaced 1 inch apart. 7. All front porch details shall match the attached drawing. 8. All front porch details shall be primed and painted. Windows 8. That all windows shall be 1/1 double-hung, aluminum clad wood and must fit original window openings with arched top. 9. The window replacements must match the profile of the original windows as close as possible. 10. Window glass shall not be tinted. Kurt Kresmery(owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: The applicant stated that they will also be painting the porch colors that borrow from the original mosaic tiling at the porch. Some commissioners expressed installation of a 5" —5 %" diameter full ball cap on the newel posts rather than a flattened ball cap as shown in the drawings. In addition, with the use of '' larger spindles (3x3), the bottom and top rail will need to be at least 41/2" wide to accommodate Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 12 of 15 rthe cove molding and the spindle. In addition, the bottom rail shall have a routed lx material placed beneath the rail to give a thicker appearance. The applicant agreed to those changes. Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) Newel posts shall have a full ball cap (5" —5 %" diameter ball), 2)the top and bottom rails shall be at least 2" x 41/2" to accommodate the 3x3 spindles, 3) the bottom rail shall have a routed lx material placed beneath the rail. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. Kurt Kresmery(owner) also stated that he will be replacing all of the windows on the building as the existing windows are beyond repair. The applicant also noted that they will be using Casco windows that have an arched top on the square sash. The only comment the commissioners noted is that modern brick mold is not to be installed but to install flat stock trim to match what is on the building now. The applicant agreed to that change. '' Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) Flat stock trim (that matches the existing) shall be installed. Modern brick mold shall not be installed. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. 851 Brook Street—Construction of rear addition The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness request for construction of an addition at the back of the house. The addition will be an un-conditioned, sunporch. The applicant noted that the existing windows on the home will not be removed and will remain intact and that the only removal of original elements is the stoop. The stoop is original to the home as it exists on the 1950 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map, however,the columns and the handrail at this location were likely installed at a later time. The home was built around 1925. The home is located on the corner lot and therefore, the proposed addition located at the rear will be visible from Slade Avenue but not from the main thoroughfare, Brook Street. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Additions Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 13 of 15 A. should be located at the rear of dwellings, not on the front or readily visible areas of the sides of dwellings. B. should be secondary (smaller and simpler)than the original dwelling in scale, design, and placement. C. should be of a compatible design in keeping with the original dwelling's design, roof shape, materials, color, and location of window, door, and cornice heights, etc. D. should impact the exterior walls of the original dwelling as minimally as possible. When building additions use existing door and window openings for connecting the addition to the dwelling. E. should be constructed to avoid extensive removal or loss of historic materials and to not damage or destroy significant original architectural features Demolition A. should be located at the rear of dwellings, not on the front or readily visible areas of the sides of dwellings. B. should be secondary (smaller and simpler)than the original dwelling in scale, design, and placement. C. should be of a compatible design in keeping with the original dwelling's design, roof shape, materials, color, and location of window, door, and cornice heights, etc. D. should impact the exterior walls of the original dwelling as minimally as possible. When building additions use existing door and window openings for connecting the addition to the dwelling. E. should be constructed to avoid extensive removal or loss of historic materials and to not damage or destroy significant original architectural features. Staff Recommendation: Staff would recommend approval for each COA request as follows and with the following conditions: Rear/Sunroom Addition: 1. That the existing windows on the home shall remain and not be removed. 2. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, %" cove, 2"x2" square, balusters with a maximum of 2.5" on center. That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. The handrail/guardrail height shall meet the minimum required handrail height per code at 34" high from the decking. The handrail and guardrail height may be reduced to 30" as the property is located within the Historic District, upon receipt of a signed Handrail Height Waiver form by owner. 3. The stair treads shall be 5/4" x 10 bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the riser a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable)to adhere board to framing. • Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 Page 14 of 15 4. The skirting shall have a 1x8 top rimboard with 1x8 corner boards and a 1x4 bottom rimboard.The vertical skirting boards shall be a 1x4 board spaced 1 inch apart and installed behind the bottom and top rimboards. 5. The flooring at the stairs shall be 1x4 tongue and groove, installed perpendicular to the house and extend past the skirting's top rimboard by at least 1 inch. Pressure treated wood or composite material (recommended) is acceptable. 6. All other details shall match the drawings. 7. All elements shall be primed and painted. Michael and Debbie Donahoe (owners)were present for tonight's COA discussion: The owners presented samples of the brick and limestone veneer to be installed along the foundation of the proposed screened in porch. They gave preference to the limestone veneer as it borrows from the limestone material that is found throughout the exterior. The commissioners stated that the limestone veneer is appropriate as it nicely ties in with the home's existing limestone and that it differentiates that new addition from the historic home. The commissioners also stated that the cedar trim should be installed smooth side out and that the porch ceiling shall not be the proposed T1-11 panels but should be of a traditional beadboard design. They suggested %" to %"thickness ply-bead panels that give the appearance of beadboard but come in 4'x8' sheets. The applicants agreed to those changes. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) cedar trim shall be installed smooth side out 2) the porch ceiling shall give the appearance of beadboard with the installation of a %"to %" ply-bead panel. The T1-11 ceiling shall be replaced with a simulated beadboard ceiling. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: • Staff stated that grants are due on Friday, March 31St and that she has received six applications so far. • Staff handed out Preservation Month Brochures to the Commissioners. CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Diamond. Design Review Subcommittee—March 28, 2017 • Page 15 of 15 ''' The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 7:19 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Christen Sundquist Community Development Department Approved: r t Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, April 11, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. March 28, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business F. New Business 1. 327 W Chicago Street—Grant Application: Rehabilitation of Side Porch 2. 600 E Chicago Street - Grant Application: Rehabilitation of front and side porch balconies 3. 3 N Liberty Street - Grant Application: Rehabilitation of front porch 4. 18 N Porter Street—Grant Application: Construction of garage, Rehabilitation of rear porch 5. 371 North Street— Grant Application: Rehabilitation of Front Porch 6. 120 Tennyson Court— Raise bathroom window 7. 372 N Spring Street—Grant Application: Rehabilitation of Front Porch 8. 507 Raymond Street— Request to maintain vinyl siding and vinyl windows that were installed without a COA or a permit. G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616} PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. • Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission April 11, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter, Bill Ristow,John Roberson, Dennis Roxworthy,Scott Savel, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: None CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve the minutes of March 28, 2017, as amended (delete "3/4" from bed molding statement on page 4. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: Judy Von Dusen, Kim Bauer and John Marston (Elgin Heritage Commissioners), who attended in staggered times throughout the meeting. PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 327 W Chicago St —Grant Application: Rehabilitation of Side Porch 600 E Chicago St - Grant Application: Rehabilitation of front and side porch balconies 3 N Liberty St - Grant Application: Rehabilitation of front porch 18 N Porter St—Grant Application: Construction of garage, Rehabilitation of rear porch 371 North St — Grant Application: Rehabilitation of Front Porch 120 Tennyson Ct— Raise bathroom window 372 N Spring St—Grant Application: Rehabilitation of Front Porch 507 Raymond St— Request to maintain vinyl siding and vinyl windows that were installed without a COA or a permit. Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 2 of 19 rek ITEMS TABLED: None NEW BUSINESS: 327 W Chicago St—Grant Application:Rehabilitation of Side Porch The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to rehabilitate the rear porch and replicate deteriorated circular window detail at front parade porch. The rear porch was enclosed sometime after the 1950s as the 1950 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map still indicates the porch as open.The applicants would like to remove the walls of the porch, restore the flooring, and beadboard, paint existing siding along with restoring the existing, original columns on the porch.The applicants noted that they haven't found evidence of a balustrade on the rear porch but are open to adding one that matches the front porch balustrade if the Commissioners wish to see a balustrade added at the rear. The applicants noted that the circular/oblong opening at the parade porch on the front of the home is beyond repair. They are requesting to replace the opening to match the existing opening exactly. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor(e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the façade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing • Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 3 of 19 A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles)should be appropriate for the building's style and period. The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Porch 1. The existing, original columns shall be retained and restored. 2. If a balustrade is added to the rear porch, it shall match the front porch design exactly (design, profile, sizing, spacing, etc.). 3. All rear porch details shall match the attached rendering. 4. All rear porch details shall be primed and painted. 5. That the exterior door (six lights over two vertical panels) currently located at the enclosed porch shall be salvaged and/or kept with the home. Parade Porch /�► 1. The replacement of the circular/oblong opening at the parade porch must match the ( existing exactly(size, width, shape, etc.) 2. Beadboard beneath the circular/oblong opening shall be replaced to match the existing exactly. All elements shall be primed and painted. ***** Ashley and Jessica Miller(owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion: Owners have opted to repair the oblong opening(lower right side only). They would prefer the rear porch without the ball &stick handrail design. Interior walls do not reflect any toe nailing. Back porch can be seen from Jackson St. Utility porch would not necessarily have had a handrail. Committee recommends the smooth clear cedar due to durability and longevity of material. Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) Repair only of oblong opening, 2) post with stop chamfers, 3)Treated pine, redwood or smooth clear cedar and 4) rear porch with or without balustrade. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. • Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 4 of 19 600 E Chicago St- Grant Application: Rehabilitation of front and side porch balconies The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to rehabilitate the balustrade at the porch balconies. The applicant is requesting to replace the existing (non-original) balustrade at both balconies with a balustrade more appropriate to the home. A historic photograph has been submitted but it is unclear exactly the design of the balustrade. To note,the balustrade at the balconies must be at least 36 inches high. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Staff Recommendation: ' Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 5 of 19 rStaff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Porch 1. The handrail shall have a 2 x 41/2" top rail with chamfered edges and a ball top to top rail, %" cove, 3x3 decorative,turned balusters,with a maximum of 2.5" apart. That the bottom rail is a 2 x 4 1/2" with chamfered edges and a lx routed edge placed beneath, installed 2" above finished floor. 2. That the newel posts shall be 6x6 (4x4 wrapped with lx material) with a lx base and top wrap and then capped with a finial to match as closely in design found in the historic photograph. 3. That the new balustrade at the balconies shall be primed and painted. Susan Haas(owner) and Scott Savel (All Around Home Improvement)were present for tonight's COA discussion: Post cap/finale to be style either F107 or F103. Spindles look massive for size of porch. Should be reduces from 3"to 11A-13/<". Square top and bottom with turned design centered with less separation. Newel post proposed at 6" plus 1" wrap; should be reduced to 4" with 1" wrap. rMotion made by Committee Member Ristow to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements to the handrail system: 1)symmetrical spindles 1'A - 1%", 2) square post 4" with 6"top and bottom dimension, and 3)top and bottom handrail increased to 3 14" width. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed 6-0-1(Abstain: Savel). 3 N Liberty St-Grant Application: Rehabilitation of front porch The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to rehabilitate the front porch at 3 N. Liberty Street. On October 11, 2016 the applicant was approved by the Design Review Subcommittee to install a temporary handrail system at the front porch with the notion that the porch would be restored in 2017. The existing porch is in varying forms of deterioration found at its porch flooring, column bases, decorative tin roofing, and stairs. The application is proposing the following for rehabilitation: 1. Installation of tongue and groove ( 1" x 3 1/8") composite decking; 2. Installation of new stairs including bull-nosed treads (2x12), stringers and risers 3. Installation of new handrails with newel posts down stairs Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 6 of 19 r 4. Installation of new balustrade (top and bottom rails and spindles). Existing spindles do not appear to be original and are disproportionate to the size of the columns. New spindles will be larger (3x3) and will be turned in a design similar to the porch columns. 5. Repair of existing columns (remove deteriorated bases with new pummeled edge base to match top of column) or if columns are beyond repair,the replacement columns will match existing in kind. 6. Installation of appropriate skirting including 1x8 top rimboard with a 1x4 bottom rimboard (raised 1" above grade) with 1x4 vertical slates spaced 3A" apart. 7. Replace decorative tin roof with new tin copper colored roof in a similar design as existing. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood rfloors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles)should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Staff Recommendation: Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 7 of 19 r'' Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Porch 1. The handrail shall have a 2" x 4'/:" top rail with chamfered edges, 3/" cove, 3x3 (nominal) (2'/+" x 2'/." actual) decorative balusters, with a maximum of 3" apart. That the bottom rail is a 2" x 4'/:" with chamfered edges and a routed lx placed beneath, installed 2" above finished floor. Railing height shall be no higher than 27" above decking(existing height). 2. That the stair treads shall be 2x12 or 5/4" x 12 (preferable) and bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable) to adhere board to framing. 3. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs and shall be 6x6 and to match existing columns in design.The newel posts shall have a full ball cap (5"—5 'A" diameter ball). 4. Repair of existing columns including removal deteriorated bases and install new 7'r4" square, pummeled edge base to match top of column. If columns are beyond repair,the replacement columns shall match the existing in kind. 5. That the existing fretwork, and brackets remain. 6. That skirting is added at the porch and stairs with the following specifications: 1x8 top rimboard with a 1x4 bottom rimboard (raised 1" above grade)with 1x4 vertical slates spaced %" apart. 7. All front porch details shall match the attached drawing. All front porch details shall be primed and painted. Aubrey Abernathy(representative for WMFL, LLC-owner)and Scott Savel (All Around Home Improvement) were present for tonight's COA discussion: Nothing appears to be within the columns. No ghost found of pilasters. Propose to install new 5''A" columns at bottom step will have stop chamfers; and elimination of the'/: post against the wall and install a mounting block for handrail and bottom rail attachment. If the column were to be installed at 7 %",then newel post and ' posts would be installed. Water table stone sticks out significantly from building face (see photos). Motion made by Committee Member Ristow to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) column to be placed on decking, 2) '/. round molding at base, and 3) staff to approve column design. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed 6-0-1 (Abstain: Savel). ' Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 8 of 19 18 N Porter St—Grant Application:Construction of garage, Rehabilitation of rear porch [ The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a new garage on the property (previous garage approved to demolished at the October 11, 2016 Design Review Subcommittee meeting). The proposed 20' x 24' garage will be located towards the rear of the property in the location of the previous garage that was demolished and includes the following: wood frame construction, smooth cedar cladding—no knots, gabled roof with a 6:12 pitch,two paneled overhead doors, and paneled service door. The applicant has also submitted a COA to rehabilitate the existing rear porch and recreate elements that are beyond repair. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Secondary Buildings: Garages, Sheds, Other Outbuildings A. Should be smaller in scale than the dwelling; clearly secondary in nature. B. Should be simple in design but reflecting the general character of the associated dwelling. For example, use gable roof forms if the dwelling has a gable roof, hipped roof forms if the dwelling has a hipped roof etc. C. Should be built at traditional locations for outbuildings in the locally designated districts. These include at rear lot lines, adjacent to alleys, and at the back side of a dwelling; D. Should be compatible in design, shape, materials, and roof shape to the associated dwelling; E. Should be of an exterior material to match the associated dwelling such as clapboard, stucco, or brick. However, if not readily visible from the street, secondary buildings may have exterior substitute siding materials such as cement fiber board with appropriate trim and exposure and cementitious materials. F. Should be of traditional materials if readily visible. For garages, wood paneled doors are more appropriate than paneled doors of vinyl, aluminum, or steel. Wood paneled overhead roll-up doors are widely available and are appropriate for new garages. For two car garages the use of two single doors instead of one larger double door is more appropriate for use in a historic district. However, one double is unacceptable for garages of less than twenty-two feet. G. Should have windows in the garage doors are recommended, but windows may not be appropriate in every case for garage doors. H. Should have raised panel steel doors are acceptable and should be painted to match the house and set off the relief of the panels. I. Should be in designs that are more appropriate for use with traditionally designed structures, if prefabricated sheds are proposed to be used. J. Should not be constructed of rough sawn cedar with knots. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request to construct the new garage if the following conditions are met: Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 9 of 19 1. That the proposed garage siding material will be clear cedar(no knots) and installed smooth side out with a 41/2" exposure (to the weather). If the property does not receive a Historic Rehabilitation Grant,then Fiber cement board (4%" exposure installed smooth side out) siding is also acceptable as the garage will be placed further back on the site and not readily visible from the right-of-way. 2. The trim at the corner boards shall be 1x4;Trim framing the garage shall include 1x4 vertical casing with an 8" header casing with a 1x2 drip cap;trim framing around garage door shall be 1x4 vertical casing and 1x4 header casing with a 1x2 drip cap. 3. 3" crown molding shall be installed along the 1x6 fascia. 4. Bed molding shall be installed along the top of the frieze board. 5. That the garage roof shall be a 12:12 slope. 6. That the eaves shall be enclosed but not be boxed and shall extend a minimum of 12 inches away from the garage wall. 7. The frieze board shall be a minimum of 8" (not to exceed 10")to match the existing home's frieze board size. 8. A decorative panel to match the details at the front elevation gable panel/attic window or a window that borrow details from the original windows on the home shall be installed between the gables. 9. That the siding and trim is to be painted a color to match or complement the existing house colors. 10. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Staff recommends approval of the request to rehabilitate the rear porch if the following conditions are met: 1. That the decorative porch elements shall be restored rather than replaced. Elements beyond repair, shall follow conditions below. 2. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, 3/" cove, 2x2 square, balusters to match existing in style, with a maximum of 2.5" apart. That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges. 3. That the stair treads shall 5/4" x 12 (recommended) or 2x12 and bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable)to adhere board to framing. 4. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs, at existing location. 5. Replacement newel posts shall match the existing in design, size, etc. 6. The flooring shall be 1x4 tongue and groove and installed perpendicular to the house. Pressure treated wood or composite material (recommended) is acceptable. 7. Skirting shall have a 1x4 bottom rim board with 1x4 vertical skirting boards spaced 1 inch apart with 1x6 vertical framing boards. 8. All rear porch details shall be primed and painted. All other details to meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. • Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 10 of 19 Paul Bednar(owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion: Eliminate text "3/3" "from staff report regarding bed molding. Porch decking to be installed perpendicular to the house with standard historic decking treatments (1x4 treated lumber or 3 %" wide tongue and groove composite material. Garage details: The 1x6 needs to set proud of the building face. Side service door can be steel with raised 6 panel design. Motion#1 made by Committee Member Hunter to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) 3 1/2" wide composite tongue and groove decking or 1x4 treated lumber installed perpendicular to the long side of the elevation, 2) center stairs with doorway, and 3)total of 3 newel posts. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed 5-1-1 (Nay: Diamond and Abstain: Savel). Motion#2 made by Committee Roxworthy to approve garage with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) 1x6 must sit proud of building face, and 2) 6 panel raised steel service door. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond. The motion passed 6-0-1 (Abstain: Savel). 371 North St— Grant Application: Rehabilitation of Front Porch The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to rehabilitate the front porch. The current porch has concrete steps leading up to a non-original wood platform (carpeted) landing. The non-original wood platform landing was installed to allow the occupant to enter the home in one plane versus having to step into the home. The applicant is proposing to restore and rehabilitate the front porch. This includes installation of 10" columns in the Doric style with tapered columns. The concrete knee walls will be adjusted to become a stepped knee wall to accommodate the height of the landing so that it aligns with the threshold of the door. This also allows the landing not to sit on top of the knee wall but to be placed in between, as it would have been traditionally built. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 11 of 19 C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the façade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting,vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Porch 1. If a guardrail is needed then the handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, %" cove, 2x2 square, balusters, spaced 2.5" apart.That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2" above the knee wall cap. 2. The handrail at the stairs(if needed) shall be pipe railing installed at one side and painted black to blend in and not detract from the overall building. 3. The columns shall be 10 inch in diameter,tapered with a Doric column and base. 4. The porch roof shall remain. 5. All front porch details shall match the attached rendering. 6. All front porch details shall be primed and painted. ***** Horacio Isunza(owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion: r ' Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 12 of 19 Owner has requested to modify option#1. Removing upper "cap" to have flush porch floor (less than 30"from lowest grade to top decking). Posts should not rest on porch floor. Install pipe handrail; without guard rail unless required by building code. Motion made by Committee Member Ristow to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) allow owner to remove upper "cap", 2) install pipe handrail without guard (unless required by building code). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. 120 Tennyson Ct—Raise bathroom window The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)to raise the existing, second floor bathroom sill at the north elevation to align with the adjacent second floor window sill. The applicant noted that the existing bathroom window sill is 10 inches below an existing bath tub that was previously installed next to the window. The previous owners removed the existing 24x50 double-hung window, installed a 24x32 window to clear the existing bathtub height, installed insulation under the window and placed a storm window in the existing 24x50 window opening. The owners are requesting to relocate the existing bathroom window sill up to align with the adjacent second floor window sill as that will give them enough clearance above the existing bathtub. The proposed window will match the existing windows in kind. They are also proposing to use obscure glass for privacy. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 13 of 19 windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. That the proposed bathroom window shall be 1/1 double-hung,wood, and must match in kind to the existing windows. The proposed window shall fit the width of the original window opening. 2. Window glass shall not be tinted but glass can be obscured at this location. 3. The bathroom window sill must align with the adjacent second floor window. 6. The sill to be relocated, if in good condition,shall be retained and reinstalled at proposed location. If sill is beyond repair, a new sill shall be recreated to match the original in size, design and profile. ***** Roberto Rizo(owner's representative) was present for tonight's COA discussion: New construction wood window. Will match exterior trim. Siding to be "stitched in" with clear cedar siding to match existing profile (appx. 'A" x 6"). Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements 1) match exterior trim, and 2) stitch in new siding to match profile. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. 372 N Spring St—Grant Application:Rehabilitation of Front Porch The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to rehabilitate the front porch. The applicant is proposing to restore and rehabilitate the front porch.The porch is situated above a lightwell and proposes some unique design problems.The current porch has concrete steps leading up to a wood porch stoop. Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 14 of 19 rTo note, although the front porch was not built at the time of construction, the small front porch was installed between 1903 and 1913 and has gained significance over time. This small front porch has been associated with the home much longer (107 years: 2017-1910) than the full front porch (39 years: 1910-1871)that was built at the time of construction. Per the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, of which our Historic District Guidelines are based, "Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic significance in their own right shall be retained and preserved." The standards also note: "Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken." Please see the attached Sanborn Maps for a reference. In addition, the small front porch was constructed at the same time as the side porch. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 15 of 19 b C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles)should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Option 1: Porch (Removal of concrete stairs) 6. The guardrail at the porch shall be restored. If removed during construction,the elements shall be reinstalled. 7. The handrail at the stairs shall match details found at the guardrail including its spindles, handrails and bottom rails to match in kind. 8. That the stair treads shall 5/4" x 12 and bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable)to adhere board to framing. 9. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs and shall be 6 inch in diameter with a 5"to 5'r4" ball cap. 10.That the existing columns to be restored and remain. 11. That skirting is added underneath the stairs, each side of stair stringer. A 1x4 bottom board shall be installed 1 inch above grade with 1x4 vertical boards installed behind the bottom board spaced 1 inch apart. 12. That the flooring at the porch stoop is to be 1x4 tongue and groove to extend past the stair riser and top rimboard at least 1 inch and be bull-nosed at the overhang. 13. All front porch details shall match the attached drawing. 14.All front porch details shall be primed and painted. Option 2: Porch (Retain concrete stairs) 7. The guardrail at the porch shall be restored. If removed during construction,the elements shall be reinstalled. 8. The handrail at the stairs shall match details found at the guardrail including its spindles, handrails and bottom rails to match in kind. 9. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs and shall be 6 inch in diameter with a 5"to 516" ball cap. 10.That the existing columns to be restored and remain. 11.That the flooring at the porch stoop is to be 1x4 tongue and groove to extend past the stair riser and top rimboard at least 1 inch and be bull-nosed at the overhang. 12. All front porch details shall match the attached drawing. All front porch details shall be primed and painted. Rosalia and Joaquin Cornejo(owners) was present for tonight's COA discussion. They would prefer to keep the concrete steps. ' Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 16 of 19 (111164 Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve either option (1 or 2) with staff recommendations and the following requirements 1) if decking is installed, 5/4"tongue and groove decking to be perpendicular to the house. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. 507 Raymond St—Request to maintain vinyl siding and vinyl windows that were installed without a COA or a permit. The COA application has been filed as a corrective action to the following violations: 1. Installation of vinyl siding and vinyl windows without a COA. The applicant has indicated their interest in keeping the existing vinyl siding and vinyl windows as they believe this is an improvement compared to the aluminum siding that clad the building prior to the installation of the vinyl. Staff conducted a site visit to the property on October 14, 2016 as the homeowner recently purchased the property and requested a meeting with staff on site. Staff stated at that time that this property is located within the Elgin National Watch Historic District and that any exterior work must be reviewed by staff or the Design Review Subcommittee. Staff also noted that the existing aluminum siding may be maintained but once it is removed, the original siding must be restored. Staff also noted that the prior owner replaced a few windows with vinyl and that these were installed without a permit. These code violations are transferred to the next homeowner and therefore, the vinyl windows must be replaced with a wood or aluminum-clad wood window to match the other original wood windows on the home. Staff also stated to the applicant that there would be historic rehabilitation grants available in January of 2017 for rehabilitation of the home including removal of the aluminum siding, restoration of the existing wood windows and replacement of the vinyl windows that the previous owner installed with wood windows. On March 22, 2017, a Code Compliance Officer found work being done on the home including installation of vinyl siding and vinyl windows without a COA or a Building Permit. The Code Compliance Officer issued a stop work order on the home. At that time, the applicant spoke with staff requesting to maintain the vinyl siding and vinyl windows. Staff advised the applicant that the Design Guidelines do not permit the installation of vinyl siding nor vinyl window's as previously mentioned at the site visit on October 14, 2016. Staff also stated to the applicant that once the non-original siding is removed any architectural features that can be restored as per the building's shadow lines will be required. To note,the Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 17 of 19 architectural features including the original window hoods were removed during installation of the aluminum siding. The applicant has also installed vinyl windows throughout the home.Staff has advised the applicant that the Design Guidelines do not permit the installation of vinyl windows and that wood or aluminum-clad wood windows are the only acceptable materials to be used for windows on this style of home. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Wood Siding A. Should be repaired rather than replaced, if original. If replacement is necessary,wood siding and shingles should be replaced with new cement board or shingles to match the original in size, placement, and design. Wood that has been concealed beneath synthetic sidings such as aluminum, asbestos, or vinyl should be repaired and the synthetic sidings removed. Following the removal of synthetic sidings,the original siding should be repaired to match the original, caulked and painted. If the "ghosts" or outlines of decorative missing features are revealed,these should generally be replicated and reinstalled. If these features are not replaced,they should be recorded through photographs or drawings for future replication. B. Should be insulated if the addition of the insulation does not result in alterations to the siding. The creation of plugs or holes for blown-in insulation is not acceptable. C. Should have original asbestos shingles kept stained or painted. If asbestos shingle siding is deteriorated or poses a health hazard, it may be removed and replaced with wood or other substitute siding. Removal of asbestos siding should follow hazardous material guidelines. D. Should not be concealed beneath synthetic materials such as vinyl, Masonite, or aluminum, if original. Original siding should also not be concealed beneath wood-based materials such as particleboard, gyp board, or pressboard. These materials generally do not possess textures or designs which closely match original wood siding. However, if more than 50%of the original siding material is damaged beyond repair, or missing, substitute materials may be applied if the following conditions are met: • the existing damaged siding materials are removed prior to the installation of substitute materials; • Vinyl material is not permissible. Rather, cement board is and should be smooth without knots and be accented with trim • Finger jointed board stock is acceptable, however, natural continuous board stock is preferable for use as siding. The application of these materials must not result in the concealment of or removal of original decorative detailing or trim including window and door surrounds. However, if no trim or surrounds exist then new wood trim in the form of fascia, corner boards, base boards, molding and windows should be installed. Substitute materials should match the dimensions of the original wood siding as closely as ' Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 18 of 19 rik possible. The cement board should abut the wood trim and be caulked to prevent moisture damage. Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. D. Which are original of steel or aluminum should be repaired with materials to match the original. If repair is not feasible, replacement should be with new windows to match the "` original as closely as possible in materials and dimensions. Aluminum extruded windows are an acceptable replacement substitute for original steel sash windows, as long as their size, shape and profile match the original windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff does not recommend approval of the application as submitted, as the proposed material (vinyl) does not meet the material requirements of the Elgin Design Guideline Manual for Landmarks and Historic Districts. Sophia Li (owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion. Owner indicated interior work was being done in the fall. Contractor installed the siding without permit. Committee confirmed that modern materials (vinyl siding) was placed over the original siding AFTER the aluminum siding was removed from the structure. They also affirmed that siding Design Review Subcommittee—April 11, 2017 Page 19 of 19 permits for repairs and/or replacements are required for all properties within the City of Elgin. Window replacements (when meeting guideline requirements for removal) within the historic districts must be completed with building permit and are required to be solid wood or wood with aluminum clad exterior. Motion made#1 by Committee Member Savel to approve the siding (vinyl material) as installed. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. Chairman Weidmeyer requested a roll-call vote for this item. The motion failed 7-0. Motion made#2 by Committee Member Savel to approve the window replacements (vinyl material) as installed. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond. Chairman Weidmeyer requested a roll-call vote for this item. The motion failed 7-0. The appeal process was explained to the property owner. If appeal is not received with 10 business days from the city's letter; homeowner must remove vinyl siding& restore the original wood siding. Additionally, the homeowner must remove the vinyl windows &replace with appropriate style solid wood or wood with aluminum clad exterior. Both siding and window work must be approved via a COA by staff. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: Grant review by staff and committee on April 19th at city hall. Mayor's Award ceremony on May 2nd at 1 Douglas Avenue. CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Roberson. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respe fully submitte Cindy A. Iden Approved: Design R- iew Subcommittee Secretary May 9, 2017 Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, May 9, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. April 11, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business F. New Business 1. 636 Park Street—Removal of existing wood fence, installation of new aluminum (black) fence 2. 1028 Douglas Avenue— Replacement of basement windows G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 (TDD (847) 931-5616) PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. r • Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission May 9, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter, Bill Ristow, Dennis Roxworthy, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Scott Savel and John Roberson CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve the minutes of April 11, 2017, as submitted. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 636 Park St—Removal of existing wood fence, installation of new aluminum (black)fence 1028 Douglas Ave— Replacement of basement windows ITEMS TABLED: 1028 Douglas Ave— Replacement of basement windows—due to nonrepresentation r Design Review Subcommittee—May 9, 2017 Page 2 of 5 NEW BUSINESS: 636 Park St—Removal of existing wood fence, installation of new aluminum(black) fence The property owner has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)to replace the decorative balustrade fence on the property with a black, aluminum style fence. The request has been submitted due to areas of deterioration at the existing fence. The property owner also indicated that the current fence is high maintenance and cost prohibitive and would like to replace it with a fence that doesn't require associated maintenance. Staff conducted a site visit on May 4, 2017 and found that the fence was in overall good condition with the most deterioration at the post caps. The existing fence is 4'-O" high in the front and side yards with a 6'-0" privacy fence in the rear yard.To note, while the fence is not original to the home, it is of an appropriate style.The existing fence was installed in 2001. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Fences A. Should be proportionate to the house and the design should be compatible with the character of the building and district. B. Should be painted white or a trim color related to the house, never left to weather or given a stain finish. E. If placed along common property lines should not be placed against another fence- double line fencing is not permitted. F. Should have posts that are set a minimum of 30 inches below grade and no more than eight feet apart. G. If wood, be of cedar, redwood or pressure treated pine, cypress or other rot resistant wood. Fences in Rear Yard L. Built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. M. Built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. N. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard. 0. Of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. P. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the historic districts.Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval if the following conditions are met: 1. The fence is in the Genesis (preferable) or Classic style. •Design Review Subcommittee—May 9, 2017 Page 3 of 5 r2. That the finial shall be of the Triad style (preferable) and placed at every other picket. C 3. That ball caps are placed at major newel posts such as at each side of the gates and at the corners of the property. The remaining newel posts shall have the standard post cap. 4. That the gates(single and double) shall be in the arched style in the same style as the proposed fence. 5. The fence is no more than 42 inches high at front and side yards. 6. The fence is painted black. If the applicant seeks to repair the existing fence; or remove the fence completely,this may be approved over the counter. Eric Featherston(owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Owner stated several portions of the existing wood fence are propped up. Posts were installed with concrete at the base; which is causing excessive moisture and rot. Existing posts are very angular with multiple cuts. Estimates to replace the posts have been significant in cost. Owner is agreeable to the Gensis style. Received information earlier today indicating the finales are about$1.00 a piece, and willing to place them on every other picket. Motion made by Committee Member Diamond to approve the COA with staff recommendations, amended by the following commission requirements: 1)Gensis style fence with rings, 2)finials to be placed on alternating spears/pickets, 3) ball cap on post, 4) all gateways with arch design with finials on top, and 5)staff approval required for any deviation of design listed above. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed unanimously. 1028 Douglas Ave—Replacement of basement windows The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness(COA)to replace four, fixed, metal basement windows with aluminum-clad wood windows with simulated divided lites.The proposed window will match closely to the existing storm window design. The windows will not change in size. The applicant noted that the existing metal windows are in varying condition (poor to fair) and would like to have two of the windows installed as awning windows to allow for more air ventilation into the basement.The other two windows will be proposed to be fixed. The applicant is also requesting to keep the current configuration of his venting system that is venting out from part of the window located at the rear of the property.The glazing in one of C the divided lites was removed to accommodate for the vent. The vent hood on the stove on the first floor is a Jenn-Air downdraft cooktop and the venting would be allowed to be maintained , Design Review Subcommittee—May 9, 2017 Page 4 of 5 in its current configuration per code due to this type of appliance. The applicant stating that he would prefer to maintain the vent-hood through the window as making a hole in the brick would be intrusive and costly. Three basement windows can be seen from the public right of way, however, are partially obstructed by vegetation. The remaining basement window proposed to be replaced is located at the rear of the home and is only visible from the alley and partially obstructed from the A/C mechanical system. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. That the proposed basement windows shall contain three-simulated divided lites (grilled installed on exterior and interior sides of the glazing) and shall fit the width of the original window opening. 'Design Review Subcommittee—May 9, 2017 Page 5 of 5 2. That the proposed basement window containing the vent shall have two-simulated divided lites and the area where the third light would be will contain a metal panel for the vent. If possible, the vent location shall be flipped so that it is hidden by the A/C mechanical unit and that the portion of the window could be seen from the street. 3. Window glass shall not be tinted. No representation. Item to be tabled. Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to table COA due to non-representation. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond. The motion passed unanimously. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: • City council will heard/consider the 2017 grant application tomorrow night (May 109') • Mayor's award ceremony received many complimented on award presentations,venue and food. CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Ristow. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 6:32 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Cindy A. alden Approved: Design Review Subcommittee Secretary May 23, 2017 r Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, May 23, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. May 9, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business 1. 1028 Douglas Avenue—Replacement of basement windows F. New Business 1. 838 Douglas Avenue— Replacement of existing fence 2. 844 Douglas Avenue— Replacement of existing fence 3. 415 Park Street— Replacement of existing fence 4. 1024 N Spring Street— Removal of original garage doors and replace with overhead doors in similar style as existing. 5. 121 Villa Street—Adjusted of roofline at garage 6. 444 Prairie Street— Construction of addition 7. 507 Raymond Street— Restoration of original siding, reconstruction of missing window hoods G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-56161 PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission May 23,2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:03 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Rebecca Hunter,John Roberson, Scott Savel, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynne Diamond, Bill Ristow and Dennis Roxworthy. CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Hunter to approve the minutes of May 9, 2017,with the following amendment: page 3 spelling(finials). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion was approved 2-0-2 (abstain: Savel & Roberson). RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business 1. 1028 Douglas Avenue—Replacement of basement windows New Business 1. 838 Douglas Avenue—Replacement of existing fence 2. 844 Douglas Avenue—Replacement of existing fence 3. 415 Park Street—Replacement of existing fence 4. 1024 N Spring Street—Removal of original garage doors and replace with overhead doors in similar style as existing. 5. 121 Villa Street—Adjusted of roofline at garage 6. 444 Prairie Street—Construction of addition 7. 507 Raymond Street—Restoration of original siding, reconstruction of missing window hoods ITEMS TABLED: F None. Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 2 of 17 OLD BUSINESS: 1028 Douglas Avenue—Replacement of basement windows Motion made by Committee Member Hunter to un-table items El for discussion (representatives for the properties in attendance for tonight's meeting). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. This request was tabled on May 9, 2017 due to lack of owner representation. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to replace four, fixed, metal basement windows with aluminum-clad wood windows with simulated divided lites.The proposed window will match closely to the existing storm window design. The applicant noted that the existing metal windows are in varying condition (poor to fair)and would like to have two of the windows installed as awning windows to allow for more air ventilation into the basement. The other two windows will be proposed to be fixed. The applicant is also requesting to keep the current configuration of his venting system that is venting out from part of the window located at the rear of the property.The glazing in one of the divided lites was removed to accommodate for the vent.The vent hood on the stove on the first floor is a Jenn-Air downdraft cooktop and the venting would be allowed to be maintained in its current configuration per code due to this type of appliance.The applicant stating that he would prefer to maintain the vent-hood through the window as making a hole in the brick would be intrusive and costly. Three basement windows can be seen from the public right of way, however, are partially obstructed by vegetation. The remaining basement window proposed to be replaced is located at the rear of the home and is only visible from the alley and partially obstructed from the A/C mechanical system. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary, the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may , Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 3 of 17 be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins.True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. That the proposed basement windows shall contain three-simulated divided lites (grilled installed on exterior and interior sides of the glazing) and shall fit the width of the original window opening. 2. That the proposed basement window containing the vent shall have two-simulated divided lites and the area where the third light would be will contain a metal panel for the vent. If possible, the vent location shall be flipped so that it is hidden by the A/C mechanical unit and that the portion of the window could be seen from the street. 3. Window glass shall not be tinted. Tom Ruydell (owner) and Vicky Slotterbek (Pella window rep.)were present for tonight's COA discussion: Tom explained the existing windows are all wood and have storms too. Vicki presented sample of the Pella wood window with aluminum cladding to be installed. A 2" brick molding with modern step is being proposed. Commissioners explained that the lx framing board with a lx flat brick molding is not typical in the historic districts, a slimmer design is more appropriate. Vicki indicated a lx could be used to keep the window profile in a more slender design. Three lites will be installed in each basement window with the exception of the window with the dryer vent. This window is located at rear of the home and has limited visibility due to distance from alley and placement of the air conditioning unit. Punching a hole thru the brick will be costly and difficult due to interior floorplan. Proposal of left lite: dryer vent will be placed at the top portion and a flat white aluminum panel will fill the remainder; while the remaining two lites for this window will be true lites. , Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 4 of 17 Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) lx framing board with a lx flat brick molding, 2) flat aluminum plan under vent, and 3) approval for operational or fixed window design (if allowed by building code). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: 838 Douglas Avenue—Replacement of existing fence The property owner has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to replace the existing cedar fence with a 5'-0" board on board, scalloped cedar fence to match in style as the neighboring fence at 832 Douglas Avenue. The request has been submitted due to areas of deterioration at the existing fence. The fence is proposed to be installed at the location of the existing fence.The existing trellis on the south side of the property to remain. The applicant is proposing this particular style to match the existing style at 832 Douglas for rk continuity. In 2015, 832 Douglas Avenue was approved to install a 6'-0" high scalloped, solid fence. The height of this fence was approved as it was installed at the rear corners of the home. The applicant is proposing to install the new fence at the existing location to align with the fence at 832 Douglas rather than pushing the fence to rear corner of their home. The applicant is proposing not to paint the new fence but to let the fence weather. To note, the current fence on the property is not painted. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Fences A. Should be proportionate to the house and the design should be compatible with the character of the building and district. B. Should be painted white or a trim color related to the house, never left to weather or given a stain finish. C. Of cat iron or other material of original design should be preserved. D. Of cast iron may be added to buildings constructed in the late 19th and early 20th century. Cast iron fences are generally not appropriate for dwellings built after 1920. E. If placed along common property lines should not be placed against another fence - double line fencing is not permitted. F. Should have posts that are set a minimum of 30 inches below grade and no more than eight feet apart. G. If wood, be of cedar, redwood or pressure treated pine, cypress or other rot resistant rwood. H. That has a decorative gate or arbors must be submitted with a drawing complete with dimensions. , Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 5 of 17 Fences in Front Yards I. Should be no higher than 36 inches with posts being slightly higher and having caps. J. Should have pickets no wider than four inches with spacing between boards a minimum of one inch up to the width of the board depending on the design of the fence K. If applicable to the layout, should have a minimum of corner posts, end posts, and gate posts which are slightly taller than the fence and five to ten inches thick with a cap and finial. Line posts can be visible and decorative to compliment the main posts or e hidden behind the picket design. Fences which cross a driveway or walkway should have gate posts. Gates should be designed to swing onto the walkway or driveway, not onto the public sidewalk. Fences in Rear Yard L. Built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. M. Built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. N. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard. 0. Of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. P. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the ellk historic districts. Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval as the height (5'-0") in the side yards does not meet the Historic District Guidelines. However, should the Design Review Subcommittee approve the proposed fence due to the fence aligning with the fence at 832 Douglas Avenue and 844 Douglas Avenue, which is located at the rear corner of both homes, staff would then recommend the following: 1. The fence shall be no higher than 5'-0"; 2. The fence shall match the style found at 832 Douglas Avenue (scalloped board on board) for continuity. 3. The fence shall be painted white or a complimentary color to the home or stained with a solid body stain. The color may be coordinated with adjacent neighbors. John Steffen (owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion. Arbor is to remain, wanting to keep the gate. Fence at 832 Douglas was installed about 2 years ago. The fence would be 5' at the highest point and scallop down to 4.5', matching the adjoining property owner's fence design and placement between the houses. If the fence on this property was to be set back from the adjoining fence, commissioners felt the fence would look out of place. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the , Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 6 of 17 following requirement: 1) fence is not to be painted, nor stained (age naturally). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. 844 Douglas Avenue— Replacement of Existing Fence The property owner has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness(COA) to replace the existing cedar fence with a 6'-0" board on board, scalloped cedar fence to match in style as the neighboring fence at 832 Douglas Avenue. The request has been submitted due to areas of deterioration at the existing fence.The applicant is proposing to install the fence at its current location due to a patio built direction behind it.The existing fence is located approximately 8'-0" east of the rear corner of the home. The applicant is proposing this particular style to match the existing style at 832 Douglas and the proposed style at 838 Douglas Avenue for continuity. In 2015, 832 Douglas Avenue was approved to install a 6'-0" high scalloped, solid fence.The height of this fence was approved as it was installed at the rear corners of the home. The height of the existing fence is 6'-0" high. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: elk Fences A. Should be proportionate to the house and the design should be compatible with the character of the building and district. B. Should be painted white or a trim color related to the house, never left to weather or given a stain finish. C. Of cat iron or other material of original design should be preserved. D. Of cast iron may be added to buildings constructed in the late 19t" and early 20th century. Cast iron fences are generally not appropriate for dwellings built after 1920. E. If placed along common property lines should not be placed against another fence- double line fencing is not permitted. F. Should have posts that are set a minimum of 30 inches below grade and no more than eight feet apart. G. If wood, be of cedar, redwood or pressure treated pine, cypress or other rot resistant wood. H. That has a decorative gate or arbors must be submitted with a drawing complete with dimensions. Fences in Front Yards I. Should be no higher than 36 inches with posts being slightly higher and having caps. J. Should have pickets no wider than four inches with spacing between boards a minimum of one inch up to the width of the board depending on the design of the fence K. If applicable to the layout, should have a minimum of corner posts, end posts, and gate posts which are slightly taller than the fence and five to ten inches thick with a cap and rk finial. Line posts can be visible and decorative to compliment the main posts or e hidden behind the picket design. Fences which cross a driveway or walkway should have gate Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 7 of 17 posts. Gates should be designed to swing onto the walkway or driveway, not onto the public sidewalk. Fences in Rear Yard L. Built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. M. Built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. N. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard. 0. Of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. P. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the historic districts. Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval as the height (6'-0") in the side yard does not meet the Historic District Guidelines. However, should the Design Review Subcommittee approve the proposed fence based on the recommendation/approval made regarding 838 Douglas Avenue, staff would then recommend the following: 1. The fence shall be no higher than 5'-0" at the side yard to nicely align with the proposed height at 838 Douglas Avenue (if the design and height was approved by the Design Review Subcommittee).The fence can then be adjusted to a 6'-0" high height once the fence is past the rear corner and into the rear yard. 2. The fence shall be installed at its existing location, approximately 8'-0" east of the rear corner of the home. 3. The fence shall match the style found at 832 Douglas Avenue (scalloped board on board)for continuity. 4. The fence shall be painted white or a complimentary color to the home or stained with a solid body stain. The color may be coordinated with adjacent neighbor. Linda Haight (owner) and Raul Negron (contractor)were present for tonight's COA discussion, who presented a new fence design. A 6' high privacy fence (5' high solid, with 1' high screening/topper) wholly constructed of wood. Commission agreed the new style presented is more pleasing then the existing fence design. Placement appears to be about 8-10' west of the NE corner of the house, and relatively close to the rear building foundation line. Fence would be approximately 70' from the city sidewalk. Commission prefers no paint on fence. Existing fence has weather to a gray exposure and looks appropriate for a taller style solid fence. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirement: 1) 6' privacy fence as presented tonight (5' solid board and 1' screened topper—per the illustration present tonight by the applicant), 2) placement to be approximately 8'-10' from rear foundation, and 3) fence is not to be painted, nor stained (age . Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 8 of 17 naturally). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. 415 Park Street—Replacement of existing fence The property owner has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness(COA) to replace the existing cedar fence with a 4'-8" dog eared, 50%open wood fence to match the height and design of their existing fence at the rear of the property. The request has been submitted as the owners would like to enclose their side yard up to their existing deck. The owners also stated that they would like the specific height of 4'-8" to be consistent with the height of their fence at the rear of the property.They also expressed concerns of having a lower fence as their dog is known to be able to jump over lower fences. Currently, the fence height at the front yard is 42 inches and is hidden behind shrubs.The fence that ran along the side yard to the rear no longer exists currently leaving the yard open to the adjacent property to the west. To note, the fence will be visible from the public-right-of-way as it abuts the parking lot of the adjacent property. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: rilk Fences A. Should be proportionate to the house and the design should be compatible with the character of the building and district. B. Should be painted white or a trim color related to the house, never left to weather or given a stain finish. C. Of cat iron or other material of original design should be preserved. D. Of cast iron may be added to buildings constructed in the late 19th and early 20th century. Cast iron fences are generally not appropriate for dwellings built after 1920. E. If placed along common property lines should not be placed against another fence - double line fencing is not permitted. F. Should have posts that are set a minimum of 30 inches below grade and no more than eight feet apart. G. If wood, be of cedar, redwood or pressure treated pine, cypress or other rot resistant wood. H. That has a decorative gate or arbors must be submitted with a drawing complete with dimensions. Fences in Front Yards I. Should be no higher than 36 inches with posts being slightly higher and having caps. J. Should have pickets no wider than four inches with spacing between boards a minimum of one inch up to the width of the board depending on the design of the fence K. If applicable to the layout, should have a minimum of corner posts, end posts, and gate posts which are slightly taller than the fence and five to ten inches thick with a cap and finial. Line posts can be visible and decorative to compliment the main posts or e hidden behind the picket design. Fences which cross a driveway or walkway should have gate Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 9 of 17 R posts. Gates should be designed to swing onto the walkway or driveway, not onto the public sidewalk. Fences in Rear Yard L. Built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. M. Built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. N. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard. 0. Of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. P. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the historic districts. Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval as the height (4'-8") in the side yards does not meet the Historic District Guidelines. However, should the Design Review Subcommittee approve the proposed fence to allow consistency with their existing rear fence, staff would then recommend the following: r 1. The fence shall be no higher than 4'-8"; 2. The fence shall match the style of the existing rear fence (dog eared spaced 50%open); 3. The fence shall be painted white or a complimentary color to the home or stained with a solid body stain; 4. Landscape material (shrubs including evergreens for year-round screening) to remain along the front elevation of the fencing to screen it. Layne&Gavin Buckland (owners) were present for tonight's COA discussion. Decking does not appear to be greater than 30". Owners are proposing to install an open 1x6 picket design. Commission recommends corner post with caps. Larger posts (6x6) with narrower pickets(1x3 or 1x4) would be more appropriate. The subject property is located next to a parking lot, and the narrower pickets will provide more "screening" of the parking lot. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) corner and gate posts to be 6x6 with profiled cap and ball and all other posts to be 4x4 with pitched caps, 2) 4'8" tall fence height maximum, and 3) 40%open 1x4 pickets. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. r Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 10 of 17 1024 N Spring Street—Removal of original garage doors and replace with overhead doors in similar style as existing. The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace existing, original wooden garage doors with new steel roll-up doors similar in appearance. The applicant noted that existing garage doors do not shut completely and in the winter freeze shut not allowing access into the garage. The garage doors appear to be in good condition with some deterioration at the base,though there is some sagging noted where the doors connect at the center, which is likely why the doors catch the ground and become difficult to open.To note, the garage is located at the alley and cannot be seen from the main thoroughfare. The homeowner is also proposing to install light fixtures at either side of the garage door; new gutters to match the existing style and to scrape and paint the entire structure. To note, the gutters and the painting can be approved by staff over the counter. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Garages, Carriage Houses and Outbuildings A. Should be preserved and maintained. Original features should be repaired to match the original. B. Should not be moved or relocated to another part of the lot, if original to the property. Garage Doors C. Should be maintained to the greatest extent possible, but may be retrofitted with modern hardware and custom garage door openers. If the original doors are missing or too deteriorated to repair, they should be replaced with new doors that fit the original opening and are appropriate to the design of construction of the garage. D. Should be raised panel designs, with solid core, if proposed to be in metal designs. Flush design doors (without raised panels) unless retrofitted to look like traditional doors and hollow core metal doors should be avoided when possible. E. If windows are necessary, they should be simple in design with clear glass. Muntins in a simple design may also be used. The use of ornamental stained glass and openings in decorative shapes such as sunbursts and oval designs are not permitted. F. Should have painted metal panel doors to match the house in color appropriate to the period of the house. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval of the garage door as submitted, since the material of the existing garage doors is in good condition with minor deterioration at the base. However, should the replacement doors be approved as proposed, staff recommends that the Design Review Subcommittee recommend the following: 1. That the proposed doors fit the existing garage door openings. 2. The proposed garage doors are painted a color to complement the existing paint scheme and not left white. 3. That Option 2 (preferred) or Option 3 is installed. 4. Salvage original doors to remain on property for possible future installation by next owner. Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 11 of 17 5. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Staff does recommend approval of the installation of lighting with the following specifications: That the light fixtures are raised an additional 1'-0" per the artist rendering to closely align with the header casing of the garage door. Meghan Charochak(owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion. Homeowner likes the character of the existing garage doors. Would prefer to install option#2 garage design. Steel door is allowed by commission. The existing hardware (hinges) can be taken off the garage, cleaned and added to the new garage door. Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve with staff recommendations and by the following requirements: 1) garage door option #2, 2) straps not to be installed 3), Remove center handles (leave lower handle in case power is out, 4) Light sconces to be center of rows of garage door lites, 5) pattern of obscure glass to be approved by staff. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. r 121 Villa Street—Adjusted of roofline at garage The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to alter the roofline and pitch of the existing garage roof as water is not being properly shed from roof. The applicant will also be replacing the existing garage doors with raised panel garage doors and installation of a raised panel man door at the north elevation. To note, there is currently no pedestrian door and the proposed location will not be visible from the street. The existing garage roof is a hipped roof. The applicant is proposing to install a gable roof. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Garages, Carriage Houses and Outbuildings A. Should be preserved and maintained. Original features should be repaired to match the original. B. Should not be moved or relocated to another part of the lot, if original to the property. Garage Doors C. Should be maintained to the greatest extent possible, but may be retrofitted with modern hardware and custom garage door openers. If the original doors are missing or too deteriorated to repair, they should be replaced with new doors that fit the original opening and are appropriate to the design of construction of the garage. D. Should be raised panel designs, with solid core, if proposed to be in metal designs. Flush design doors (without raised panels) unless retrofitted to look like traditional doors and hollow core metal doors should be avoided when possible. • Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 12 of 17 E. If windows are necessary, they should be simple in design with clear glass. Muntins in a simple design may also be used. The use of ornamental stained glass and openings in decorative shapes such as sunbursts and oval designs are not permitted. F. Should have painted metal panel doors to match the house in color appropriate to the period of the house. Staff Recommendation: Staff does not recommend approval of the alteration of the roof form as the existing roof form is hipped. Staff would recommend for approval with the following recommendations: 1. The roof pitch is adjusted to allow for better water runoff, but the roof form, hipped, remains. Should the Design Review Subcommittee approve the submitted request, staff would then recommend the following: 1. The pitch of the gable shall match the pitch on the existing home. 2. That the roof extends past the garage walls by at least 1,-0" 3. That the fascia be 6 inches with 3" crown molding 4. That a frieze board with bedmolding installed at the top shall be installed in the same size found on the existing home. 5. That the gable siding match the existing cedar lap siding in kind (material, size, profile, exposure, thickness, etc.) 6. That clear, cedar siding is installed, primed and painted complimentary color to the home. 7. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Staff does recommend approval of the garage door replacement and installation of a pedestrian door with the following specifications: 1. The proposed garage doors and pedestrian door are painted a color to complement the paint scheme on the home and not left white. 2. The garage doors shall be square, raised panel. If windows are to be installed they shall be placed at the top row and be only glass with no adornment. 3. That 1x4 trim is installed on the sides and the header of the pedestrian door along with a 1x2 drip cap. David Hammond (owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion. Owner indicated the garage has problems shedding water and would like access to garage via a service door on the west elevation (non-visible from street view). Two overhead doors with no lites is proposed. Commission requested the new roof's pitch match the house with similar eve returns. After much discussion, the returns were deemed unnecessary for the accessory structure. Owner indicates he is unable to install an overhang, due to garage proximity to property lines. No soffit. Finishing front with 1x12 and 1x8 Motion made by Committee Member Hunter to approve with staff recommendations and by the following requirements: 1) garage roof to match house pitch, 2) match existing siding . Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 13 of 17 profile with clear, smooth, %2 x 6 cedar boards, 3) if desired by owner, eve returns can be added, 4) 1x4 corner boards and 1x6 frieze boards, 5) no lites in overhead door, 6) service door on west elevation, 7) 1x4 trim around service and garage doors, and 8) 1x2 beveled drip cap (sitting proud of siding) above service and garage doors. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. 444 Prairie Street—Construction of addition The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness request for construction of a 2' x 5' addition at the side (east elevation) of the house. The applicant noted that they would like to enlarge their existing kitchen by 10SF and that the proposed addition will match the existing architectural features as close as possible including the cedar siding, trim, crown molding and cornerboards.The roof of the addition will be an extension of the existing roof with the same pitch. A corner window will be removed. The home is located on the corner lot and therefore,the proposed addition located at the side will be visible from Channing Street but not from Prairie Street. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Additions A. should be located at the rear of dwellings, not on the front or readily visible areas of the sides of dwellings. B. should be secondary (smaller and simpler)than the original dwelling in scale, design, and placement. C. should be of a compatible design in keeping with the original dwelling's design, roof shape, materials, color, and location of window, door, and cornice heights, etc. D. should impact the exterior walls of the original dwelling as minimally as possible. When building additions use existing door and window openings for connecting the addition to the dwelling. E. should be constructed to avoid extensive removal or loss of historic materials and to not damage or destroy significant original architectural features Staff Recommendation: As the addition will be minimally disruptive to the original configuration of the home, staff would recommend approval with the following conditions: Kitchen Addition: 1. That the siding is of clear cedar and matches the thickness, exposure, profile of the existing siding.The siding shall not sit proud of the trim but shall abut into the new trim on the addition. 2. The roof line follows the same pitch as the existing roof. 3. The corner boards shall match the existing in size, thickness, material. 4. The frieze board with bed molding matches the existing in kind. • Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 14 of 17 5. The fascia board matches the size as the existing with the installation of in-kind crown molding 6. All other details shall match the drawings. All elements shall be primed and painted. Melissa &Adam Patterson (owners) were present for tonight's COA discussion. Owners indicated water damage which seemed to be coming from the narrow window. When the siding was removed, the box board was found to be rotten. The small bump out would assist with the correction of the water damage and provide additional interior space for their kitchen (counter top, upper & lower cabinets). Interior design details were shown to the commissioners by the applicant. Siding profile would be done to match with 1 x 4 trim boards at corners. Roof line will continue the existing roof line. Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve with staff recommendations and by the following requirements: 1) match details (fascia, crown 3/4 round), 2) trim boards to be proud of siding.. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. 507 Raymond Street— Restoration of original siding, reconstruction of missing window hoods The COA application has been submitted to restore the original siding found under the substitute siding material; and replace missing architectural features including window hoods. The applicant submitted a request to the Design Review Subcommittee on April 11, 2017 to maintain the existing vinyl siding and vinyl windows that were recently installed without building permits or a COA. The request was denied by the commission unanimously.The applicant chose not to appeal the decision and will be restoring the original siding, and reconstructing missing features. Staff completed a site inspection at May 17, 2017 and found that the siding was in good condition.There are some areas of deterioration found on the north elevation that are recommended to be replaced in kind (clear cedar, same exposure and thickness of original cedar clapboards). Originally, there was a side porch that extended all the way to the front of the house.There are remnants of where a pilaster (engaged column)was located as well as the porch roof. The applicant is proposing to fully replace those areas of missing cedar siding with new cedar siding. Though, the applicant mentioned that if the Design Review would prefer, they would install a [ vertical cedar board in the location of the original pilaster for possible future restoration. - Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 15 of 17 To note, the remaining aluminum siding around the windows and doors will be removed.The aluminum at the soffits and fascia will remain. At this time,the applicant is still looking at options for replacement windows. In addition, the inappropriate handrails that were recently installed will be removed. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Wood Siding A. Should be repaired rather than replaced, if original. If replacement is necessary, wood siding and shingles should be replaced with new cement board or shingles to match the original in size, placement, and design. Wood that has been concealed beneath synthetic sidings such as aluminum, asbestos, or vinyl should be repaired and the synthetic sidings removed. Following the removal of synthetic sidings, the original siding should be repaired to match the original, caulked and painted. If the "ghosts" or outlines of decorative missing features are revealed, these should generally be replicated and reinstalled. If these features are not replaced, they should be recorded through photographs or drawings for future replication. B. Should be insulated if the addition of the insulation does not result in alterations to the siding. The creation of plugs or holes for blown-in insulation is not acceptable. C. Should have original asbestos shingles kept stained or painted. If asbestos shingle siding is deteriorated or poses a health hazard, it may be removed and replaced with wood or other substitute siding. Removal of asbestos siding should follow hazardous material guidelines. D. Should not be concealed beneath synthetic materials such as vinyl, Masonite, or aluminum, if original. Original siding should also not be concealed beneath wood-based materials such as particleboard, gyp board, or pressboard. These materials generally do not possess textures or designs which closely match original wood siding. However, if more than 50%of the original siding material is damaged beyond repair, or missing, substitute materials may be applied if the following conditions are met: • the existing damaged siding materials are removed prior to the installation of substitute materials; • Vinyl material is not permissible. Rather, cement board is and should be smooth without knots and be accented with trim • Finger jointed board stock is acceptable, however, natural continuous board stock is preferable for use as siding. The application of these materials must not result in the concealment of or removal of original decorative detailing or trim including window and door surrounds. However, if no trim or surrounds exist then new wood trim in the form of fascia, corner boards, base boards, molding and windows should be installed. Substitute materials should match the dimensions of the original wood siding as closely as possible. The cement board should abut the wood trim and be caulked to prevent moisture damage. • Design Review Subcommittee—May 23, 2017 Page 16 of 17 •A Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Siding: Replacement siding in cedar shall be installed on the entire house with proper trim around windows, corner boards, base boards, fascia boards and soffits under roof overhangs meeting the following requirements: 1. Damaged siding shall be repaired, epoxy preferred 2. Nail holes must be patched with putty, epoxy preferred. 3. New siding shall be installed only as necessary with replacements-in-kind to match the original siding profile and exposure. 4. All replacement wood material shall be clear (no knots), cedar preferred and installed smooth side out. 5. All missing window hoods to match shadows must be installed. 6. Appropriate trim boards shall be repaired or installed as necessary at the corners and around doors and windows, which includes but is not limited to the corner boards and front window caps. 7. Siding shall be sanded, primed and painted. All other specifications to meet the Design Review Commission's recommendations. [ Sophia Li (owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion. Only siding and window hoods are being reviewed tonight. Commission indicated siding repairs should be weaved in with the existing siding. Weaving of siding was described in great detail to the applicant. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and by the following requirement: 1) new siding must be weaved in existing siding. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: At the permit counter this week, Cindy explained she worked with a property being renovated that only two lots away from the Elgin National District. When asked if they would consider using guidelines from the historic district to maintain the intrigued of the district, the project manager was intrigued and willing. Although the property is not within a historic district, he was willing to use details from the Design Guidelines for the property improvements. Discussions regarding the various proposed rprojects included garage replacement, house repairs and fencing. Project manager was agreeable to install appropriate style garage overhead and service doors, smooth cedar siding - Design Review Subcommittee—May 23,2017 Page 17of17 with a reveal to match house, 4"trim and corner boards(proud of siding); all details to be installed meeting standards of the historic district. A "win/win"for everyone. CORRESPONDENCE: Christen to complete a "dry run" of the National Trust for Historic Preservation tour event to be held later this year. ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Savel. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Cindy A. Wa Approved: JP., Design Review Subcommittee Secretary 06./3 ,,2.4 17 r Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday,June 13, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. May 23, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business F. New Business 1. 126 Hill Avenue— Rehabilitation of front and side porches 2. 27 Hill Avenue— Reconstruction of front stairs and handrails 3. 132 Hill Avenue— Reconstruction of front porch handrails. 4. 103 S. Gifford Street— Replacement windows on accessory structure 5. 506 St. Charles Street—Demolition of attached garage; construction of detached garage 6. 327 DuPage Street—Construction of garage 7. 226 Villa Street— Installation of new windows 8. 427-429 Fulton Street— Replacement of original garage doors G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616) PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. 4 Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission June 13, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter, Bill Ristow,John Roberson, Scott Savel, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Dennis Roxworthy CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve the minutes of May 23, 2017, as [C amended (Page 3 molding and 2x's; Page 7 per illustration by applicant, Page 9 post dimensions and cap design details). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed 4-0-2 (Abstain: Diamond &Savel). RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: Pat Miller PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 126 Hill Avenue—Rehabilitation of front and side porches 27 Hill Avenue—Reconstruction of front stairs and handrails 132 Hill Avenue—Reconstruction of front porch handrails. 103 S.Gifford Street—Replacement windows on accessory structure 506 St. Charles Street—Demolition of attached garage; construction of detached garage 327 DuPage Street—Construction of garage 226 Villa Street— Installation of new windows 427-429 Fulton Street—Replacement of original garage doors (withdrawn prior to meeting) filk ITEMS TABLED: None Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 2 of 18 rik NEW BUSINESS: 126 Hill Avenue—Rehabilitation of front and side porches The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to rehabilitate the front and side porches. Many of the original features at the front are not original. The applicant is proposing to borrow details found on the home to reconstruct appropriately styled columns, brackets and details. Although the side porch is not original (installed sometime after the 1950s as it is not shown on the 1950 Sanborn Map),the applicant is proposing to keep the porch and install appropriate architectural features that borrow elements from the front porch and the home.The flooring of the side porch will remain. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor(e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the façade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting,vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass,or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Design Review Subcommittee—June 13,2017 Page 3 of 18 Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber.The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. Should have newel posts and balusters,treads and risers,to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. The handrail shall have a 1 'A"x 5"top rail with chamfered edges,3A" cove,2 X" x 2'/<" decorative balusters,with a maximum spacing of 2.5". That the bottom rail is a 1'A" x 5" with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. 2. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs and shall be a 6x6 with chamfered edges, and a finial to match the finial found at the front elevation of the home. 3. The columns shall be 6x6 with chamfered edges, capital and brackets to match elements found on the home.The columns shall match the engaged column found at the front porch. 4. All front and side porch details shall match the attached renderings. 5. All front and side porch details shall be primed and painted. 6. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Dan Miller(representative for owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion: Mockup bracket and spindle for front porch was presented to commission. Alignment of porch column and concrete stoop is not the same. Staff's illustration indicates an extension of the handrail to an additional newel post prior to the stairs. Pendant element on the house was used to determine newel post cap design. Side porch box beam was suggested to follow the plane of the roof. Commission agreed for staff to make final design details on site. Column and newel posts will have chamfered edges. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and by the following requirements: staff to approve final details on site for side porch. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. rThe motion passed unanimously. Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 4 of 18 r 27 Hill Avenue—Reconstruction of front stairs and handrails The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to reconstruct the front porch stairs and handrails. The current front steps are in poor condition, covered in carpet and have ornamental metal handrails at either side of the porch.Since the owner is proposing to rebuild the existing stairs, per building code, a landing must be installed. To note, the porch was enclosed sometime after the 1950s as it is still open per the Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained.Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor(e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting,vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained.Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Design Review Subcommittee—June 13,2017 Page 5 of 18 Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber.The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. Should have newel posts and balusters,treads and risers,to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, %" cove, 2x2 square balusters, with a maximum spacing of 2.5".That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. 2. That the stair treads shall 5/4" x 12 (recommended) and bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable.When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable)to adhere board to framing. 3. The flooring at the landing shall be 1x4 tongue and groove and installed perpendicular to the house. Pressure treated wood or composite material (recommended)is acceptable. 4. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs and shall be a 6x6 newel post with a 1x base wrap, and lx top wrap topped with a post cap (no ball cap but a standard post cap to match design of base of columns at enclosed front porch.) 5. All front porch details shall match the attached drawing. 6. All front porch details shall be primed and painted. 7. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Andrew Cuming (owner) and Derek Cole (contractor—TNT Restoration) were present for tonight's COA discussion: Recommendation for newel post design by staff(noted in red on the drawing provided in the agenda packet),which was agreeable to both owner and contractor. Skirt framing needs to be added against foundation. All framing to set proud of the skirting. Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) newel post design (noted in red on drawing, and 2)skirt framing (1x6) against foundation wall, all framing to set proud of skirting. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed unanimously. Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 6 of 18 r 132 Hill Avenue—Reconstruction of front porch handrails. The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to reconstruct the front porch handrails. The COA application has been filed as a corrective action to the following violations: 1. Removal of existing metal handrails and installation of wood handrails without a COA and Building Permit. The front porch has been altered several times since the building was constructed, however, originally when the building was built there was a front stoop at the general location of where the current front stoop is located. The stoop roof at the front and side porch were installed in 1959 along with the metal handrails.The applicant is proposing to install metal handrails that will match the design of the existing side porch handrails for overall design continuity with the mid-century stoop roofs. The applicant is also looking at replacing their side porch handrails located at the north elevation to match the existing design as the handrails are in poor condition. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood,glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. • Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 7 of 18 r B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles)should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber. The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. Should have newel posts and balusters,treads and risers,to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted as the front and side porch elements have gained significance over time (over 50 years old).As we have evidence of the design of the handrails original to the 1959 canopies,they should be replicated to match the design that was installed in 1959. Juan Campos(owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Several commissioners indicated the metal railings would seem inappropriate,even though the porch roofs were installed in the 1950's. Due to the overall massive size of the front porch, bulkier railings were expressed to be more appropriate. Additionally, concern was expressed regarding the size of the front roof possibly needing additional supports (columns). The guy wire/chains in the photo images appeared to be slack, not providing support. Staff stated the type of cantilever roof design has gained historic value (greater than 50 years), and columns would then be inappropriate for roof style. Commission would like to see a porch design with columns and railings for consideration. Owner is will to install either metal railings or wood columns with railing system. Willing to work with staff and commission to resolve code violation issue. Motion made by Committee Member Ristow to table the COA until the next meeting for design considerations of porch with column and railings vs metal railings only. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. r Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 8 of 18 103 S. Gifford Street—Replacement windows on accessory structure The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the existing windows throughout the gabled, secondary structure (the larger of the two separate buildings) located at the south end of the property. The structure is part of St. Mary's Catholic Church/School complex and currently houses the kindergarten classrooms. The building was built between 1950 and 1973 and is considered a non-contributing secondary structure. The existing building exterior consists of hardboard panel siding. Many of the doors that are not in use have been covered over with a similar material. The applicant is proposing to install either Andersen 100 Series—Fibrex windows or Jeld-Wen aluminum-clad wood windows throughout the building. The applicant stated their concerns with cost as the Andersen 100 Series is more affordable than the Jeld-Wen aluminum-clad wood windows. The applicant noted their concerns due to comfort and safety of the existing building and would like to complete the following improvements on the building before the school is in session in August. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 9 of 18 H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval of the Andersen 100 Series as the material, Fibrex, does not meet the Historic District Guidelines. Staff would recommend approval of the Jeld-Wen Aluminum-Clad Wood Window as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. All proposed windows shall be installed to fit the existing window openings. 2. Window glass shall not be tinted. However,the secondary structure is listed as non-contributing in the survey of the Elgin Historic District.The Design Review Subcommittee has approved the use of alternate materials for windows on non-contributing buildings in the past, dependent on the situation. Should the Design Review Subcommittee approve the proposed Andersen 100 Series window,staff would then recommend the following: 1. All proposed windows shall be installed to fit the existing window openings. 2. Window glass shall not be tinted. Barbara Colandrea and Marshall Spangler(representatives of St. Mary's Catholic Church/School) were present for tonight's COA discussion: First class was held in this temporary structure in 1964. Construction drawings for a principal building addition have been drawn up, however funding has not been available for construction. The Anderson Fiberex window is a type of plastic window. Product was recently presented to committee. That representative indicated only Anderson will be allowed to install these windows. Cost difference between the two windows is significant ($298 vs$598 per window). Commission did acknowledge pricing is typically conducive of quality of product. Concern expressed by the committee of setting a precedence for the newer (Fiberex)type window. Examples of"case by case" exceptions were given of other types of projects throughout the districts that were granted exceptions from the Design Review Guidelines due to specific factors of the their project and site/property features. Commission agreed this is an example of a case by case scenario. The building is a secondary structure on property. Structure is temporary in design/construction. Window replacements would have very limited visibility from the street view. Additionally, religious groups are not allowed to request grant dollars for rehabilitation projects. Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 10 of 18 r Motion made by Committee Member Diamond to approve either window presented with staff recommendations based on this building be deemed a temporary structure, non-contributing to the historic district with limited visibility from the street view; with the following requirements: sash and trim to match as closely as possible to existing. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. 506 St. Charles Street—Demolition of attached garage; construction of detached garage The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish their attached garage (original to the home) and reconstruct a 24'x 24' detached garage at the rear of the property. The applicant noted that their current garage only accommodates one car and only enough space to park one car in the driveway. They'd like more room to store two cars in a garage that will borrow design elements from the existing single garage.The original window on the garage will also be retained and reinstalled in the new proposed garage.The siding will be smooth fiber cement board siding with 4"to 4'A" exposure. The home was built in the 1970s and considered a non-contributing building to the significance of the area. The existing siding on the home is vinyl. To stay with the overall consistency of the rest of the home,the applicant is proposing to install vinyl at the area where the garage will be removed. Lastly,the cupola on the garage was removed sometime between 2012 and present. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Guidelines for Demolition A. Should be avoided of any original feature or part of a pre-1945 building. B. should not occur, unless: 1. An emergency condition exists and the public safety and welfare requires the removal of the building or structure; 2. A building does not contribute to the historical or architectural character of the districts and its removal will improve the appearance of the districts; or 3. The denial of the demolition will result in an Economic Hardship on the applicant as determined by Chapter 20.10 of Title 20 of the Elgin Municipal Code—"Elgin Historic Preservation Ordinance." 4. The denial of the demolition will impede rehabilitation, or redevelopment of the site, and/or adjacent properties from substantially improving the aesthetic, architectural or economic value of the affected properties and surrounding area. Secondary Buildings: Garages, Sheds,Other Outbuildings A. Should be smaller in scale than the dwelling; clearly secondary in nature. • Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 11 of 18 B. Should be simple in design but reflecting the general character of the associated dwelling. For example, use gable roof forms if the dwelling has a gable roof, hipped roof forms if the dwelling has a hipped roof etc. C. Should be built at traditional locations for outbuildings in the locally designated districts. These include at rear lot lines, adjacent to alleys, and at the back side of a dwelling; D. Should be compatible in design, shape, materials,and roof shape to the associated dwelling; E. Should be of an exterior material to match the associated dwelling such as clapboard, stucco, or brick. However, if not readily visible from the street, secondary buildings may have exterior substitute siding materials such as cement fiber board with appropriate trim and exposure and cementitious materials. F. Should be of traditional materials if readily visible. For garages,wood paneled doors are more appropriate than paneled doors of vinyl, aluminum,or steel. Wood paneled overhead roll-up doors are widely available and are appropriate for new garages. For two car garages the use of two single doors instead of one larger double door is more appropriate for use in a historic district. However, one double is unacceptable for garages of less than twenty-two feet. G. Should have windows in the garage doors are recommended, but windows may not be appropriate in every case for garage doors. H. Should have raised panel steel doors are acceptable and should be painted to match the house and set off the relief of the panels. (Pik I. Should be in designs that are more appropriate for use with traditionally designed structures, if prefabricated sheds are proposed to be used. J. Should not be constructed of rough sawn cedar with knots. Siding A. Should be repaired rather than replaced, if original. If replacement is necessary,wood siding and shingles should be replaced with new cement board or shingles to match the original in size, placement, and design.Wood that has been concealed beneath synthetic sidings such as aluminum, asbestos, or vinyl should be repaired and the synthetic sidings removed. Following the removal of synthetic sidings,the original siding should be repaired to match the original, caulked and painted. If the "ghosts" or outlines of decorative missing features are revealed,these should generally be replicated and reinstalled. if these features are not replaced,they should be recorded through photographs or drawings for future replication. B. Should be insulated if the addition of the insulation does not result in alterations to the siding.The creation of plugs or holes for blown-in insulation is not acceptable. C. Should have original asbestos shingles kept stained or painted. If asbestos shingle siding is deteriorated or poses a health hazard, it may be removed and replaced with wood or other substitute siding. Removal of asbestos siding should follow hazardous material guidelines. D. Should not be concealed beneath synthetic materials such as vinyl, Masonite, or aluminum, if original. Original siding should also not be concealed beneath wood-based materials such as particleboard,gyp board, or pressboard.These materials generally do not possess textures or designs which closely match original wood siding. However, if Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 12 of 18 more than 50%of the original siding material is damaged beyond repair, or missing, substitute materials may be applied if the following conditions are met: • the existing damaged siding materials are removed prior to the installation of substitute materials; • Vinyl material is not permissible. Rather,cement board is and should be smooth without knots and be accented with trim • Finger jointed board stock is acceptable, however, natural continuous board stock is preferable for use as siding. The application of these materials must not result in the concealment of or removal of original decorative detailing or trim including window and door surrounds. However, if no trim or surrounds exist then new wood trim in the form of fascia, corner boards, base boards, molding and windows should be installed. Substitute materials should match the dimensions of the original wood siding as closely as possible.The cement board should abut the wood trim and be caulked to prevent moisture damage. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request to construct the new garage, due to its age and non- conforming status, if the following conditions are met: r Garage 1. That the proposed garage siding material will be clear cedar (no knots) and installed smooth side out or fiber cement board siding(smooth) in a profile and exposure to match the house's existing exposure. 2. That the siding and trim is to be painted a color to match or complement the existing house colors. 3. That the garage roof shall match the slope of the home's roof slope. 4. That the eaves shall be enclosed but not be boxed and shall extend a minimum of 12 inches away from the garage wall. 5. The frieze board shall match the same size as found on the existing garage.The frieze board shall be painted. 6. That the cupola shall be proportional/enlarged (at least 4'-0" in width)to accommodate the new size of the garage.The cupola shall borrow design elements from the design of the cupola found in the 2012 photograph. 7. That all other details match the submitted drawings. 8. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Siding on home 1. The siding shall be weaved (every 3 "courses/boards" may align) into the existing siding to conceal seams of the location of the existing garage. The wall shall not look like a garage was once there. 2. The siding must match the color of the existing siding on the home. If the whole north elevation is to be replaced with new siding, it shall be in white to match the siding on the rest of the home. Design Review Subcommittee—June 13,2017 Page 13 of 18 3. Siding shall match the existing siding in kind (material, exposure, profile,etc.) Sy!wester Jakubas(owner)and Daniel Sampiller(contractor)were present for tonight's COA discussion: House is noncontributing to historic district. The garage roof pitch will match the house. Copula should be incorporated into the garage design, but on a larger scale due to the increase of garage size. On the north elevation of house where the garage is removed,the existing doorway will remain. White vinyl siding will be installed to match the other three elevations. Motion made by Committee Member Diamond to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: cupola size to be increased per staff illustration. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed unanimously. 327 DuPage Street—Construction of garage The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a one-car garage on the property as the property currently does not have a garage. The proposed 24'x 17'-6"garage will be located towards the rear of the property and includes the following:wood frame construction,smooth cedar cladding—no knots, mansard roof to match the roof on the existing home,one arched raised paneled overhead door, and paneled service door(door to match design found at the side porch door).The garage will have dentils that wrap around the entire garage to match details found on the home as well as arched dormers and arched wood windows to match in size, design (divided lites) as found on the existing home. Dependent on location of the garage on the property,the garage may need to be reduced in size to 22' as accessory structures must be at least 4'-0" away from primary structures and 3'-0" away from the property line per zoning code. A portion of the garage will be "cut" angled at the south west corner to be able to push the garage back as far as possible, however,the mansard roof will retain its shape and may extend past the 3'-0" set back as long as it does not cross the property line. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Secondary Buildings:Garages,Sheds, Other Outbuildings A. Should be smaller in scale than the dwelling; clearly secondary in nature. B. Should be simple in design but reflecting the general character of the associated dwelling. For example, use gable roof forms if the dwelling has a gable roof, hipped roof forms if the dwelling has a hipped roof etc. Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 14 of 18 rik C. Should be built at traditional locations for outbuildings in the locally designated districts. These include at rear lot lines, adjacent to alleys, and at the back side of a dwelling; D. Should be compatible in design, shape, materials, and roof shape to the associated dwelling; E. Should be of an exterior material to match the associated dwelling such as clapboard, stucco, or brick. However, if not readily visible from the street,secondary buildings may have exterior substitute siding materials such as cement fiber board with appropriate trim and exposure and cementitious materials. F. Should be of traditional materials if readily visible. For garages,wood paneled doors are more appropriate than paneled doors of vinyl, aluminum, or steel. Wood paneled overhead roll-up doors are widely available and are appropriate for new garages. For two car garages the use of two single doors instead of one larger double door is more appropriate for use in a historic district. However, one double is unacceptable for garages of less than twenty-two feet. G. Should have windows in the garage doors are recommended, but windows may not be appropriate in every case for garage doors. H. Should have raised panel steel doors are acceptable and should be painted to match the house and set off the relief of the panels. I. Should be in designs that are more appropriate for use with traditionally designed structures, if prefabricated sheds are proposed to be used. J. Should not be constructed of rough sawn cedar with knots. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request to construct the new garage if the following conditions are met: 1. That the proposed garage siding material will be clear cedar(no knots) and installed smooth side out in a profile and exposure to match the house's existing wood siding. 2. That the siding and trim is to be painted a color to match or complement the existing house colors. 3. That the garage roof shall be a mansard roof to match the same pitch/design as found on the existing home. 4. That the eaves shall be enclosed but not be boxed and shall extend a minimum of 12 inches away from the garage wall. Soffit shall match in kind found on the existing home. 5. The windows found at the dormers shall be arched and match the windows in kind found on the existing home. 6. That dentils be installed around the entire garage to match the size and spacing of the dentils found on the existing home. 7. All other details match the submitted drawings. 8. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Frank Adame(owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: rk Owner indicated his slight increase of overall size from 17'6"x24'to 20'x24'. • Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 15 of 18 Committee wanted to ensure the garage/secondary structure is not too fancy. Garage should be simple in detailing, not a smaller replication of the house. Owner indicated the bell skirt/curve of the mansard roof will be replicated from the house. Crown molding and dentils will be added to garage. Roof pitch is slight, but allows run off. One mansard style garage is known to be in Elgin near Barrett& Percy. However it is not known if it was constructed there or moved to that location. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and by the following requirements: 1) bell skirt of roof to be incorporated, 2) east elevation to have two windows installed, other elevations allowance for single window only if desired by owner, 3)crown molding to match house detail, and 4) dentils are optional. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. 226 Villa Street—Installation of new windows The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness request to replace all existing windows on the home and installation of new windows at some areas where windows have been bricked in.The applicant proposed to install aluminum clad wood, double-hung, 1/1 windows. The applicant is proposing to reopen several windows that have been bricked in over the years and install new windows that fit the masonry open. However,they are proposing windows that do not follow the arch of the masonry open but traditional windows with an arched insert panel. There are several windows that will remain bricked in due to the proposed layout of the interior. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location,size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in r determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 16 of 18 cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. D. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. E. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins.True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. F. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. G. That are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. That all windows shall be 1/1 double-hung, aluminum clad wood and must fit original window openings. 2. Brick molds must be installed and shall be 2 inches in width. Brick molds should have a traditional/historic profile versus modern brickmold. 3. Required egress windows shall be a casement window with a simulated meeting rail (meeting rail placed on the exterior and interior of the window, a spacer may be added as well). This is to ensure that the brick mold remains and makes all the windows consistent with design. 4. The windows shall be arched to follow the existing segmental masonry arch. 5. Window glass shall not be tinted. 6. All other details match the submitted drawings. 7. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Eduardo Ordaz(owner)and Alex Ordaz (owner's son) were present for tonight's COA discussion: Bay window should not be installed with two double hung windows. Bay needs to have a large fixed lower glass and upper transom window. Side windows are very narrow and a double hung maybe impossible to obtain. Casement style window maybe required for light and ventilation. Total of six (6) bricked up windows are to be opened up and new windows installed. Some of the upper windows would not be opened all the way, due to safety. Commissioners have seen both arched windows and rectangular windows with trim detailing installed in brick structures with brick arches. The trim detailing is what makes the arch window design look appropriate. A bad example of trim detailing is found at 211 Michigan. Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 17 of 18 Suggestion of one mockup window on the rear elevation with trim detail to be installed for staff review and approval prior to other windows openings being done. Owner was agreeable to this option since the windows are custom sizing. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) one square top window with trim (setting proud)to be installed on rear elevation for staff approval, prior to additional arched window openings being installed, 2) medium size sash and rails—historic district standard dimensions, 3) bay window with transom and larger lower fixed glass,4) side bay windows in casement style, only if double hung design is not obtainable. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. 427-429 Fulton Street—Replacement of original garage doors The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace three, (3)original wooden swing garage doors with new steel raised panel doors. The applicant stated that they would like to install raised panel doors for ease of their tenants. Staff noted to the applicant that the garage is listed as a contributing secondary structure to the historic significance of the Elgin Historic District and that per our Historic District Guidelines, original materials, if in good condition,shall be maintained/retained. Staff completed a site assessment of the garage doors on June 9, 2017 and found that they were in overall good condition.The garage was constructed between 1913 and 1950 per the Sanborn Maps. The garage is visible from the public way. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Garages, Carriage Houses and Outbuildings A. Should be preserved and maintained. Original features should be repaired to match the original. B. Should not be moved or relocated to another part of the lot, if original to the property. Garage Doors A. Should be maintained to the greatest extent possible, but may be retrofitted with modern hardware and custom garage door openers. If the original doors are missing or too deteriorated to repair,they should be replaced with new doors that fit the original opening and are appropriate to the design of construction of the garage. B. Should be raised panel designs,with solid core, if proposed to be in metal designs. Flush design doors (without raised panels) unless retrofitted to look like traditional doors and hollow core metal doors should be avoided when possible. Design Review Subcommittee—June 13, 2017 Page 18 of 18 tirk C. If windows are necessary,they should be simple in design with clear glass. Muntins in a simple design may also be used. The use of ornamental stained glass and openings in decorative shapes such as sunbursts and oval designs are not permitted. D. Should have painted metal panel doors to match the house in color appropriate to the period of the house. Staff Recommendation: Staff does not recommend approval of the application as submitted as the original garage doors are in good condition. This item was withdrawn by the applicant. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: None CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Roberson The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 7:52 p.m. Respectfully s bmitt-d, Cindy alden Approved: Design Review Subcommittee Secretary o6/ 7/9,7 Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee r Tuesday,June 27, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. June 13, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business 1. 132 Hill Avenue— Reconstruction of front and side porch handrails F. New Business 1. 467 Division Street— Maintaining steel frame gazebo 2. 431 E Chicago Street— Reconstruction of garage 3. 226 Villa Street—Window opening re-design G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616) PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. r t • Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission June 27,2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2"d floor of City Hall)by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter, Bill Ristow,John Roberson, Scott Save! (6:03), and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Dennis Roxworthy CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion mode by Committee Member Ristow to approve the minutes of June 13, 2017, as amended (pg. 7 add "bulkier"). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed 5-0. RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business 132 Hill Avenue—Reconstruction of front and side porch handrails New Business 467 Division Street—Maintaining steel frame gazebo 431 E Chicago Street—Reconstruction of garage 226 Villa Street—Window opening re-design ITEMS TABLED: 132 Hill Avenue, remained on the table due to non-representation r Design Review Subcommittee—June 27,2017 Page 2 of 10 r OLD BUSINESS: 132 Hill Avenue—Reconstruction of front and side porch handrails *This item was tabled due to the request for a new design of wood handrails at the front and side porch to match the style of the home and not the style of the 1959 stoops. The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to reconstruct the front porch handrails.The COA application has been filed as a corrective action to the following violations: 1. Removal of existing metal handrails and installation of wood handrails without a COA and Building Permit. The front porch has been altered several times since the building was constructed, however, originally when the building was built there was a front stoop at the general location of where the current front stoop is located. The stoop roof at the front and side porch were installed in 1959 along with the metal handrails.The applicant is proposing to install wood handrails at the front and side porches to match the style of the home and not the style of the stoops. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained.Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor(e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. r Design Review Subcommittee—June 27,2017 Page 3 of 10 Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period. The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber.The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. Should have newel posts and balusters,treads and risers,to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness with the following recommendations: 1. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, %" cove, 2x2 square balusters, with a maximum spacing of 2.5".That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. 2. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs and shall be a 6x6 newel post with a lx base wrap,topped with a post cap and ball. 3. All front and side porch details shall match the attached rendering. 4. All front and side porch details shall be primed and painted. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. No representation for this COA was present for tonight's COA discussion, therefore the item remained tabled. NEW BUSINESS: 467 Division Street—Maintaining steel frame gazebo The property owner has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a steel framed gazebo with cloth/insect screen covering in the side yard located on the south C Design Review Subcommittee—June 27, 2017 Page 4 of 10 side of their property.The COA application has been filed as a corrective action to the following violations: 1. Installation of steel frame gazebo without a COA and Building Permit. The property technically does not have a rear yard as it is situated on the corner with the home situated on almost the entire lot. Due to the proposed material of the gazebo and its side yard location, Staff requested that the applicant appear before the Design Review Subcommittee. To note, if this request is approved by the Design Review Subcommittee,the applicant will need to seek a variance with the Planning and Zoning Commission as any accessory structure located in an R3 zoned district must be at least 4'-0" away from the primary structure and 3'-0" away from the lot line. In addition,the area of which the gazebo will be installed will be considered a patio (gathering of people) and no longer a driveway and therefore would require a 6'-0" setback from interior lot lines per the city's ordinance. The applicant proposed to replace their driveway on April 3, 2017 with brick, which was approved by staff over the counter. This requires a 3'-0" setback from interior lot lines. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Yard Features Pergolas,arbors, gazebos, fountains, tree houses, ponds,and statuary A. should be sited in rear yards or side yards B. should be of wood construction in designs appropriate for pre-1945 dwellings. Yard features constructed of materials such as glass, metal or brick can be placed in yards if situated near the rear of the lot and effectively screened by fencing or landscaping. C. should not be located in street yards. Arbors are light open structures of trees or shrubs closely planted, either twined together and self-supporting, or supported on a light lattice. The designs for these structures should be based on historic designs appropriate for pre-1945 dwellings. Wood construction should be used rather than brick, concrete, metal, or glass. Appropriate structures in front yard shall be reviewed by the Design Review Subcommittee. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval as the material (metal) for a gazebo does not meet the historic district guidelines. However, the overall design does not detract from the historic integrity of the home and the gazebo is also partially covered by the existing fence.Though, it can still be seen from Walker Design Review Subcommittee—June 27, 2017 Page 5 of 10 Place but not from the main thoroughfare, Division Street. In addition,the accessory structure may be seen as reversible (can be removed without affecting the historic integrity of the home). Lastly,the applicant noted that this is a seasonal structure that can be removed and taken down during the winter months. If the Design Review Subcommittee approves the application as submitted, staff would recommend the following: 1. The accessory structure disassembled and stored during seasonal changes. Eilyn Tomassini (owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Gazebo was assembled with screws. Screen material added to all four sides along with small lights have been added to the structure by the homeowner. Currently not anchored to the ground. Commissioners expressed concern of unit not being anchored. Wind could possible move or tip the metal unit over. This is a standalone structure, not a screened porched attached to the house. Gazebos in the historic district are typically constructed of wood, per guidelines. Small lot within the historic district, containing mostly house with limited yard area(s). Gazebo is quite visible from the street even with current tree foliage. Staff noted a zoning variation is required for the placement of the gazebo on the zoning lot. Commission indicated they would entertain a trial basis of one year. Staff to take photo during in January 2018 for commission to see the visibility during non-foliage periods. COA should be brought back to the commission for final consideration (approval/denial) next spring. Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve a trial period of one year. Staff to provide photos for final consideration of this COA by the DRSC in spring 2018. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed 5-1 (Nay: Diamond). 431 E Chicago Street—Reconstruction of garage The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to reconstruct a two-car garage on the property to match the recently demolished garage design.The COA application has been filed as a corrective action to the following violations: 1. Demolition of existing garage and reconstructing new garage at same location. The applicant received a permit on June 8, 2017 for spot replacement of existing cedar siding to match in kind at the existing garage. A stop work order was placed on the property on June 14, Design Review Subcommittee—June 27, 2017 Page 6 of 10 2017 by Code Compliance Officer Joshua VonDran due to the previous garage being demolished without proper approval. The applicant noted that he was unaware that his contractor demolished the garage. The applicant is proposing to replace the design of the garage in kind in the same footprint as well as the location of the windows,the pitch and design (hipped) of the roof, siding,trim, etc. The garage was approximately 20'x22' in size with two garage doors. To note, the garage was built sometime after the 1950s as it does not exist in the 1950 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Secondary Buildings:Garages, Sheds, Other Outbuildings A. Should be smaller in scale than the dwelling; clearly secondary in nature. B. Should be simple in design but reflecting the general character of the associated dwelling. For example, use gable roof forms if the dwelling has a gable roof, hipped roof forms if the dwelling has a hipped roof etc. C. Should be built at traditional locations for outbuildings in the locally designated districts. These include at rear lot lines, adjacent to alleys, and at the back side of a dwelling; D. Should be compatible in design, shape, materials, and roof shape to the associated dwelling; E. Should be of an exterior material to match the associated dwelling such as clapboard, stucco, or brick. However, if not readily visible from the street, secondary buildings may have exterior substitute siding materials such as cement fiber board with appropriate trim and exposure and cementitious materials. F. Should be of traditional materials if readily visible. For garages, wood paneled doors are more appropriate than paneled doors of vinyl, aluminum, or steel. Wood paneled overhead roll-up doors are widely available and are appropriate for new garages. For two car garages the use of two single doors instead of one larger double door is more appropriate for use in a historic district. However, one double is unacceptable for garages of less than twenty-two feet. G. Should have windows in the garage doors are recommended, but windows may not be appropriate in every case for garage doors. H. Should have raised panel steel doors are acceptable and should be painted to match the house and set off the relief of the panels. I. Should be in designs that are more appropriate for use with traditionally designed structures, if prefabricated sheds are proposed to be used. J. Should not be constructed of rough sawn cedar with knots. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request to construct the new garage if the following conditions are met: r Design Review Subcommittee—June 27, 2017 r Page 7of10 1. That the proposed garage siding material will be clear cedar(no knots) and installed smooth side out in a profile and exposure to match what was once there (4''A" exposure). 2. The trim shall be a 1x4 at the following locations: corner boards; garage doors with an 8" header casing as well as at the windows.The header at the windows shall extend past the vertical trim by at least 1 inch as well as the sill to match the photograph.The trim must sit proud of the siding. 3. The proposed windows shall be wood with a 2"top rail and stiles with a 3" bottom rail. The glazing shall be glass and not tinted.The design of the window shall match the enclosed photograph exactly. 4. That the garage roof shall be hipped to match the previous garage roof design. 5. That the eaves shall be enclosed but not be boxed and shall extend a minimum of 12 inches away from the garage wall. Soffit shall match in kind found on the existing home. 6. Garage doors shall be raised panels. 7. The garage shall be painted in complimentary colors to the existing home. 8. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Arturo Zamudlo(owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Owner indicated materials were being stored inside the structure was pushing the wall out. Commission expressed great concern of demolition being completed without COA consideration by staff and/or commission; especially when a COA was requested for"repair" only. House has at least a 6/12 pitch, possibly 8/12 with hip design. Garage style and pitch should match the house. Standards for trim and fascia to be indicated in approval too. Man/service door to be installed on west elevation. Door can be steel or wood with 6 panels design without window, or 2 vertical panels with window above. Motion made by Committee Member Ristow to approve with staff recommendations and by the following requirements: 1) Hip design roof with 6/12 or 8/12 pitch (staff to approve), 2) 12" soffit overhang, 3) 2%" siding exposure (needs to be padded out),4)two fixed windows (4 lite optional), 5) installation of man/service door(as noted above), 6) match trim on all doors and windows (must sit proud of siding), 7) bed molding details and aluminum drip cap. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed 5-1 (Nay: Roberson). 226 Villa Street—Window opening re-design The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness request to alter the design of the windows so that they are 13" shorter than the existing at locations that require fall protection. • Design Review Subcommittee—June 27, 2017 Page 8 of 10 r The applicant's request to replace existing windows and open up brick areas was approved at the Design Review Subcommittee meeting held on June 13, 2017. After which,the applicant found that the existing windows at the proposed bedroom locations are only 11 inches above the finished floor. Per building code, any sill that is below 24 inches must have some type of fall protection. Staff advised that there are casement and double-hung windows that provide fall protection with a latch that only allows the window to open no more than 4 inches but can release to open fully during an emergency.The architect stated that they are uncomfortable approving those windows as the latch may fail leaving the window with no fall protection. Therefore,to meet building code,the applicant is proposing to raise the existing window sill and relocate it at 24 inches above the finished floor so that it meets the required height for no fall protection.The windows will still be casement, aluminum-clad wood windows with simulated meeting rails at egress areas only. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors:damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. r Design Review Subcommittee—June 27,2017 Page 9 of 10 H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. That the existing sills (brick or limestone) are to be relocated at the proposed locations with new brick installed where the previous sill was located to match the existing brick in kind. 2. That all other specifications regarding the windows shall match those that were approved at the Design Review Subcommittee held on June 13, 2017. 3. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Eduardo Ordaz(owner) and Alex Ordaz (owner's son)were present for tonight's COA discussion: Total of seven (7)windows on the upper floor. Commission noted there are so many layers of paint and various mortar joints on the structure, the entire house should be painted to provide uniform color. Limestone or cast concrete sills should be installed. Cast concrete needs to mimic the existing limestone sill on all windows. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and by the following requirements: matching limestone or cast concrete sills installed on all window openings. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: None CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Savel. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond. The motion passed unanimously. Design Review Subcommittee—June 27, 2017 Page 10 of 10 r The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 7:00 p.m. Respec ully submitted, (fatijogesc_ Cindy A. den Approved: Design Review Subcommittee Secretary 0-, //-.020 r r Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, July 11, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. June 27, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business F. New Business 1. 12 Hill Avenue — Restoration of siding; Recreation of missing architectural features 2. 372 N. Spring Street— Installation of new window at 2nd floor, south elevation 3. 133 Hill Avenue—Construction of shed 4. 133 N. Porter Street— Rehabilitation of front porch 5. 456 S. Liberty Street —Construction of a 2-car garage G. Other H. Tabled Items 1. 132 Hill Avenue— Reconstruction of front and side porch handrails (Tabled until July 25th) I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616} PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. s r Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission July 11, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers(Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter, Bill Ristow,John Roberson, Scott Savel,and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Dennis Roxworthy CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve the minutes of June 27, 2017, as e"" amended (pg. 5 "trial", pg.7 add "were" and change "perpendicular"to "vertical". The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 1. 12 Hill Avenue—Restoration of siding; Recreation of missing architectural features 2. 372 N. Spring Street—Installation of new window at 2nd floor, south elevation 3. 133 Hill Avenue—Construction of shed 4. 133 N. Porter Street—Rehabilitation of front porch 5. 456 S. Liberty Street—Construction of a 2-car garage ITEMS TABLED: 132 Hill Avenue—remains on the table until July 25, 2017. 12 Hill Avenue—tabled due to non-representation. r Design Review Subcommittee—July 11, 2017 Page 2 of 10 NEW BUSINESS: 12 Hill Avenue—Restoration of siding;Recreation of missing architectural features The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to restore the original siding on the house and replace any missing architectural features. The house was formerly clad with aluminum substitute siding. The applicant obtained a COA for the removal with the condition that Staff conduct a site inspection following the completion of the siding removal. Staff conducted a site assessment on June 29, 2017. At that time the substitute siding was removed. It was found that the original siding(cedar shingles)was in good condition with select areas in need of replacement including several window sills,window trim,window hoods, bed molding, bell skirt at second floor and porch brackets. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Wood Siding A. Should be repaired rather than replaced, if original. If replacement is necessary, wood siding and shingles should be replaced with new cement board or shingles to match the original in size, placement, and design.Wood that has been concealed beneath synthetic sidings such as aluminum, asbestos,or vinyl should be repaired and the synthetic sidings removed. Following the removal of synthetic sidings the original siding should be repaired to match the original,caulked and painted. If the "ghosts" or outlines of decorative missing features are revealed,these should generally be replicated and reinstalled. If these features are not replaced they should be recorded through photographs or drawings for future replication. B. Should be insulated if the addition of the insulation does not result in alterations to the siding.The creation of plugs or holes for blown-in insulation is not acceptable. C. Should have original asbestos shingles kept stained or painted. If asbestos shingle siding is deteriorated or poses a health hazard, it may be removed and replaced with wood or other substitute siding. Removal of asbestos siding should follow hazardous material guidelines. D. Should not be concealed beneath synthetic materials such as vinyl, masonite, or aluminum, if original. Original siding should also not be concealed beneath wood based materials such as particle board, gyp board, or press board.These materials generally do not possess textures or designs which closely match original wood siding. However, if more than 50%of the original siding material is damaged beyond repair, or missing, substitute materials may be applied if the following conditions are met: a. the existing damaged siding materials are removed prior to the installation of substitute materials; b. Vinyl material is not permissible. Rather, cement board is and should be smooth without knots and be accented with trim c. Finger jointed board stock is acceptable, however, natural continuous board stock is preferable for use as siding. r Design Review Subcommittee—July 11, 2017 Page 3 of 10 ribk The application of these materials must not result in the concealment of or removal of original decorative detailing or trim including window and door surrounds. However, if no trim or surrounds exist then new wood trim in the form of fascia, corner boards, base boards, molding and windows should be installed. Substitute materials should match the dimensions of the original wood siding as closely as possible.The cement board should abut the wood trim and be caulked to prevent moisture damage. Paint Removal and Surface Preparation A. Should be performed by manual scraping or by using appropriate chemical removers. A paint shaver may be used, but with caution so as to avoid removal of wood siding. B. Should be performed cautiously when removing paint through heat plates or heat guns to avoid unnecessary damage to the wood through charring or fire. C. Should not be removed by abrasive techniques such as sand or water blasting since this can damage the wood and introduce moisture into the building. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Sidin 1. Damaged siding shall be repaired, epoxy preferred 2. Nail holes must be patched with putty, epoxy preferred. 3. New siding shall (cedar shingle) be installed only as necessary with replacements-in-kind to match the original siding profile,size and details. 4. All replacement wood material shall be clear(no knots), cedar preferred and installed smooth side out. 5. All deteriorated trim boards,window hoods, bed molding,crown molding and sills that are beyond repair or missing shall match the existing in kind. 6. Bell skirting shall be installed at the area of missing shingles at north and south elevations (gable ends). 7. Brackets at the front porch shall be recreated to match shadow line locations. The brackets shall match the design of the attached photograph. 8. Entire home shall be prepped, primed and painted. No representative was present for discussion of this COA request. Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to table this COA,due to nonrepresentation. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. r Design Review Subcommittee—July 11, 2017 Page 4 of 10 C 372 N.Spring Street—Installation of new window at 2"d floor, south elevation The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)to install a wood double- hung window at the south elevation, second floor. The applicant noted that there are currently no windows in the room beyond and that they'd like to install a double-hung window to the west of the existing balcony door to allow for more light and air ventilation in that space. They would like to propose to install a double-hung window directly to the west of the second floor balcony door to match the existing windows in size, design, material,etc. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins.True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Design Review Subcommittee—July 11,2017 Page 5 of 10 Double-Hung Window 1. That the proposed window shall be 1/1 double-hung, wood, and must match in kind to the existing windows; 2. Window glass shall not be tinted; 3. The window sill must align with the second floor window sills unless it does not meet the fall hazard height;then the sill shall be installed at 24 inches off of the floor. 4. The sill,trim and details shall be constructed to match the original sill,trim and details in size,design and profile. Rosalia and Joaquin Cornejo(owners)were present for tonight's COA discussion: Window is needed for ventilation for the bedroom. Illustration is incorrect. The proposed window should be right of the doorway(as you face the structure), within the boundary of the balcony area. Window would match the details of the window to the right of the balcony. Commissioners agrees,the new window location would be slightly visible from the street, mostly obscured by the balcony structure. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements amendments: 1) location of window to be right of doorway, 2) right side trim of window to be 3-6" between to the closest portion of balcony railing. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond. The motion passed unanimously. 133 Hill Avenue—Construction of shed The property owner has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness(COA)to install a 16'x16' frame shed on the north east area of their property. The shed will be constructed of wood with a gable roof and match the details found on the existing garage. However,there are some slight differences including the pitch of the roof which is proposed as a 6:12 pitch and due to the distance between the garage and the structure (minimum 4'-0"), the applicants are proposing to install a pedestrian door on the same side as the shed doors. The applicant is also requesting that the shed doors be of a metal, 6 raised panel double doors to match the pedestrian door at the garage.The proposed shed will be minimally visible from the public way. To note,the garage was approved by the Design Review Subcommittee on November 24, 2015. r Design Review Subcommittee—July 11, 2017 Page 6 of 10 Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Secondary Buildings:Garages, Sheds,Other Outbuildings A. Should be smaller in scale than the dwelling; clearly secondary in nature. B. Should be simple in design but reflecting the general character of the associated dwelling. For example, use gable roof forms if the dwelling has a gable roof, hipped roof forms if the dwelling has a hipped roof etc. C. Should be built at traditional locations for outbuildings in the locally designated districts.These include at rear lot lines, adjacent to alleys, and at the back side of a dwelling; D. Should be compatible in design, shape, materials, and roof shape to the associated dwelling; E. Should be of an exterior material to match the associated dwelling such as clapboard, stucco, or brick. However, if not readily visible from the street, secondary buildings may have exterior substitute siding materials such as cement fiber board with appropriate trim and exposure and cementitious materials. F. Should be of traditional materials if readily visible. For garages,wood paneled doors are more appropriate than paneled doors of vinyl, aluminum,or steel. Wood paneled overhead roll-up doors are widely available and are appropriate for new garages. For two car garages the use of two single doors instead of one larger double door is more appropriate for use in a historic district. However, one double is acceptable for garages of less than twenty-two feet. G. Should have windows in the garage doors are recommended, but windows may not be appropriate in every case for garage doors. H. Should have raised panel steel doors are acceptable and should be painted to match the house and set off the relief of the panels. I. Should be in designs that are more appropriate for use with traditionally designed structures, if prefabricated sheds are proposed to be used. J. Should not be constructed of rough sawn cedar with knots. Staff Recommendation: Staff would recommend approval for the installation of the proposed shed as it is minimally visible from the public way and contains a gable roof and wood construction that is similar in design to the existing garage. The following conditions shall apply for approval: 1. That the proposed shed siding material will be clear cedar(no knots) and installed smooth side out in a profile and exposure to match the existing garage siding. Fiber cement board siding is also acceptable as the shed will be placed further back on the site and not visible from the right-of-way. If fiber cement siding will be installed, ensure that the trim extends beyond the face of the shed by'A". 2. That the siding and trim is to be painted a color to match or complement the existing house colors. Trim shall extend beyond the face of the shed by%". 3. That the shed roof slope is a minimum of a 6:12 pitch and match in form (gable). r Design Review Subcommittee—July 11, 2017 Page 7of10 4. That the eaves shall not be boxed but shall be enclosed and follow the pitch of the shed roof.The eaves shall closely match the eaves of existing house. 5. The fascia may consist of a 1x6, however, must have a metal, k-style gutter installed to break up the plane. If gutters won't be installed,than a 2 %"crown molding shall be installed along the fascia. 6. Bed molding shall be installed under the soffit around the entire shed. 7. That the frieze board dimensions match existing house.The frieze board shall be a minimum of 8". The frieze board shall be painted. 8. That the shed double doors and pedestrian doors are more in keeping with a shed door design.The material, metal is acceptable. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. ***** Hannah Phillips(owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Home indicated the plane/alignment of the southern portion of the shed will be in line with the garage. The north elevation of the shed will be difficult at best to see from the street. Proposed man door and double doors would not be visible from the street. Due to lack of visibility of the south elevation,commission is okay with the proposed style of doors on the structure. The service/man door will be 36"wide and the double door will have 7' opening. Motion made by Committee Member Ristow to approve with staff recommendations and the following amendment: 1) applicant may install the 6 panel door as proposed (if desired). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. 133 N. Porter Street—Rehabilitation of front porch ***** William Flaman(owner)and Matt Iverson (contractor)were present for tonight's COA discussion: If the illustration by staff,the left staircase appears to extend out from the column. However, based on the photo,that extension is not required and the handrail should end into the column without a newel post. Newel posts on bottom steps should have a hip cap, no ball topper. Flooring can be either wood or composite material. 5/4 treads with bullnose on 3 sides. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the Design Review Subcommittee—July 11, 2017 Page 8 of 10 following amendments: 1)staff to approve tread design (solid or split), and 2) No newel post at top of left staircase. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed unanimously. 456 S. Liberty Street—Construction of a 2-car garage The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a two-car garage on the property as the property currently does not have a garage. The proposed 20' x 22'garage will be located towards the rear of the property and includes the following:wood frame construction,fiber cement board siding-smooth,gambrel roof to match the roof on the existing home, two raised paneled overhead doors, and paneled service door. The garage will have details to match those on the home including wall shingles, clapboard siding,trim and moldings. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Secondary Buildings: Garages,Sheds,Other Outbuildings A. Should be smaller in scale than the dwelling; clearly secondary in nature. r B. Should be simple in design but reflecting the general character of the associated dwelling. For example, use gable roof forms if the dwelling has a gable roof, hipped roof forms if the dwelling has a hipped roof etc. C. Should be built at traditional locations for outbuildings in the locally designated districts. These include at rear lot lines, adjacent to alleys, and at the back side of a dwelling; D. Should be compatible in design, shape, materials, and roof shape to the associated dwelling; E. Should be of an exterior material to match the associated dwelling such as clapboard, stucco, or brick. However, if not readily visible from the street, secondary buildings may have exterior substitute siding materials such as cement fiber board with appropriate trim and exposure and cementitious materials. F. Should be of traditional materials if readily visible. For garages, wood paneled doors are more appropriate than paneled doors of vinyl, aluminum,or steel. Wood paneled overhead roll-up doors are widely available and are appropriate for new garages. For two car garages the use of two single doors instead of one larger double door is more appropriate for use in a historic district. However, one double is unacceptable for garages of less than twenty-two feet. G. Should have windows in the garage doors are recommended, but windows may not be appropriate in every case for garage doors. H. Should have raised panel steel doors are acceptable and should be painted to match the house and set off the relief of the panels. I. Should be in designs that are more appropriate for use with traditionally designed structures, if prefabricated sheds are proposed to be used. Design Review Subcommittee—July 11, 2017 Page 9of10 J. Should not be constructed of rough sawn cedar with knots. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request to construct the new garage if the following conditions are met: 1. That the proposed garage siding material will be fiber cement board and installed smooth side out in a profile and exposure to match the house's existing wood siding. 2. That the siding and trim is to be painted a color to match or complement the existing house colors. 3. That the garage roof shall be a gambrel roof to match the same pitch/design as found on the existing home. 4. That the eaves shall be enclosed but not be boxed and shall extend a minimum of 12 inches away from the garage wall. Soffit shall match in kind found on the existing home. 5. The fixed window found at the front gambrel of the garage shall match the proportions of the window at the front gambrel of the home.The window shall be either a wood or aluminum-clad wood window. 6. The trim,frieze board, fascia shall match in size, design, profile as found on the existing home. 7. All other details match the submitted drawings. 8. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. r ..... Jose Ocampo(owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Overhang eaves to be flat. Trim boards must be padded out to set proud of the siding. Commission prefers the details and trim shown in the staff illustration. Profile of siding exposure to be 4 IA". Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve with staff recommendations and the following amendments: 1) 6 panel service door to be installed on side of garage, within a feet from the garage door elevation, 2) coach lights can be installed (staff for final approval)and 3) rear elevation of garage with siding only(no shingles), with trim to match front of garage. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: 415 Park St-Staff inspection of fence was denied. Details noted in COA approval were not installed properly. 564 N Spring St—Staff to contact owner regarding status of temporary ramp. COA was flibk approved in September 2015 for a two year period. Design Review Subcommittee—July 11, 2017 Page 10 of 10 CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Save!. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Respectfull submitted ea41' Cindy A. W. d: Approved: Design Review Subcommittee Secretary 7 .5--aev7 C C Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, August 8, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. July 25, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business 1. 132 Hill Avenue — Reconstruction of front and side porch handrails F. New Business 1. 803 N. Spring Street— Removal of single front door and sidelights and install double doors at front entrance elk 2. 1013 Douglas Avenue — Replace concrete stoop with brick pavers 3. 419-421 N Spring Street— Restoration of original siding 4. 163 Hill Avenue— Fence installation 5. 456 Douglas Avenue—Window and door replacement (rear) 6. 384 St. Charles Street— Rear egress stair replacement and construction of addition over rear basement entrance. G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616} PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission August 8, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2"d floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: John Roberson, Scott Savel (6:02), Rebecca Hunter, Bill Ristow, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Dennis Roxworthy and Lynne Diamond CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation APPROVAL OF MINUTES: No minutes were presented for consideration. RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business 132 Hill Avenue— Reconstruction of front and side porch handrails New Business 803 N. Spring Street— Removal of single front door and sidelights and install double doors at front entrance 1013 Douglas Avenue—Replace concrete stoop with brick pavers 419-421 N Spring Street— Restoration of original siding 163 Hill Avenue— Fence installation 456 Douglas Avenue—Window and door replacement (rear) 384 St. Charles Street— Rear egress stair replacement and construction of addition over rear basement entrance. ITEMS TABLED: Due to nonrepresentation, 163 Hill Avenue was tabled. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 2 of 18 OLD BUSINESS: 132 Hill Avenue—Reconstruction of front and side porch handrails **This item was tabled due to the request for a new design of wood handrails at the front and side porch to match the style of the home and not the style of the 1959 stoops. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to un-table items E1 for discussion (representatives for the properties in attendance for tonight's meeting). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed unanimously. The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to reconstruct the front porch handrails. The COA application has been filed as a corrective action to the following violations: 1. Removal of existing metal handrails and installation of wood handrails without a COA and Building Permit. The front porch has been altered several times since the building was constructed, however, originally when the building was built there was a front stoop at the general location of where the current front stoop is located. The stoop roof at the front and side porch were installed in 1959 along with the metal handrails.The applicant is proposing to install wood handrails at the front and side porches to match the style of the home and not the style of the stoops. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the façade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 3 of 18 H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period. The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber. The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. Should have newel posts and balusters, treads and risers, to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness with the following recommendations: 1. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, 3/" cove, 2x2 square balusters, with a maximum spacing of 2.5". That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. 2. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs and shall be a 6x6 newel post with a lx base wrap, topped with a post cap and ball. 3. All front and side porch details shall match the attached rendering. 4. All front and side porch details shall be primed and painted. 5. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Viviana Luna (owner's daughter) was present for tonight's COA discussion: The Commission stated that the owner should be given an option to use either the 5" ball cap or a square hipped cap to place on top of the newel posts. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 4 of 18 Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following amendments: A 5" ball cap or a square hipped cap shall be installed on top of newel posts. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: 803 N. Spring Street—Removal of single front door and sidelights and install double doors at front entrance The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)to request approval for the removal of the existing front door, sidelights and transom (no glass in transom nor sidelights, only a panel that exists) and installation of a salvaged, wood double- door at this location. The applicant stated that originally the home had double-doors at this location and would like to install two solid cherry doors with simple arched raised molding with Eastlake designed hardware.The doors were salvaged from ReStore.The homeowner noted that there are hinge marks on both sides of the door frame and they were shown an older photograph from a neighbor that showed double-doors at this location. However, they no longer have that photograph. The transom and sidelights will be removed to accommodate the salvaged doors. The double- doors that were found do not fill the opening completely as they are 3 inches short of the door frame. The applicant is proposing to infill the 3 inch gap with a painted piece of wood with decorative edging. The applicant is also proposing to replace the bases of two columns on the front porch due to deterioration to match in kind to the existing bases as well as paint the home in areas of faded/peeling paint. To note, the last requests can be approved by staff over-the-counter. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Doors and Door Features A. should be replaced with new doors appropriate for the style and period of the dwelling. Replacement doors should be similar in design to the original in style, glazing (type of glass and area) and lights (pane configuration). Wood or solid core fiberglass are acceptable materials for use in replacement doors. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 5 of 18 B. should be constructed of solid wood panels, such as the four-panel Homestead or Italianate design may be used on the front if appropriate to the style of the house. C. should involve glazing in clear etched or beveled glass as appropriate to the style of the house, if applicable. D. should only involve artificial materials such as "lexan" or other acrylic based materials, if applicable. E. should not be removed or altered.The original size of the door opening should not be enlarged, reduced, or shortened in height. F. should not be replaced by doors with new designs, especially those at the front entrance or at side entrances which are readily visible from the street. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval with the following specifications: 1. The existing single front door shall be salvaged or kept on property for possible reuse in the future. Jennifer Van Duyn (owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion: The Commissioners stated that the 3" trim piece shall be connected/tied into the existing trim and not to the doors.The owner stated that they still have not decided a final design for the trim piece.The Commissioners stated that staff can have final approval of design for trim piece. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following amendments of: 3" trim piece shall tie into the existing trim and not the doors and that a final design of the trim piece shall be presented and approved by staff prior to installation. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed unanimously. 1013 Douglas Avenue—Replace concrete stoop with brick pavers The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to replace the concrete stoop with natural stone veneer and sidewalk with brick pavers. The sidewalk exhibits several areas of cracked and heaved concrete of which the owners are proposing to remove and replace with brick pavers. The applicant's also noted that the stoop exhibits a spall, though, currently is cosmetic. Staff explained to the applicant that original materials must be retained and restored if they are not Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 6 of 18 beyond repair. The applicant noted that the contractors they spoke to stated that they could repair the area but would not guarantee the work. The applicant's also stated that the adjacent homes are similar in style and have brick paver sidewalks. In addition,the home adjacent to it, located at 1007 Douglas Avenue, has brick pavers for its steps and landing at the front stoop. The applicant also noted that the first step is connected to the existing sidewalk as one piece and if they install a new sidewalk, the concrete step may not be able to be retained without pieces of it being broken. It is also not level and has sunk/settled at the north corner by 4 inches.The natural stone veneer will be placed on top of the landing with the first step replaced with a limestone slab. The applicant's noted that they were trying to tie in the limestone on the home by installing it on the stoop. The applicant is also proposing stamped concrete as a secondary option for the stoop.The stamped concrete will still have the look of the limestone found on the home and done in a neutral color. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber.The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser no less than 1 inch. D. Should have newel posts and balusters, treads and risers, to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval for the replacement of the original concrete porch with an alternate material as this does not meet the Historic District Design Guidelines. Staff would recommend the approval of the COA as submitted with the following conditions: 1. The concrete stoop shall be retained and repaired as it is an original feature to the home and is in overall good condition. If replaced, the new stoop shall match the existing in material,texture, size, and design. 2. The first step shall be re-poured in concrete and re-leveled to match the existing step in design/size/texture, etc. 3. The concrete sidewalk shall be replaced with brick pavers up to the porch stoop. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 7 of 18 However, there is evidence of differing material at the stoops at adjacent properties and there is evidence of limestone on the home. If the Design Review Subcommittee approves the request as proposed, staff would then recommend the following: 4. The proposed work shall match the submitted specifications not to exceed the footprint of the existing stoop. 5. All other details to follow Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Rudy and Lillian Galfi(owners) were present for tonight's COA discussion: The Commissioners noted that they would prefer the stamped concrete option versus installing a stone veneer to the existing concrete stoop. The homeowners noted that they also would prefer the stamped concrete. Other items discussed including enlarging the existing stoop, while keeping the form/shape of the stoop, so that it would accommodate moving the columns past the existing porch header. This adjustment to the design is what would have been seen on historic porch stoops of this style. The Commissioners also stated that the top of the stamped concrete stoop should be smooth with rough edges to appear as limestone.They also asked that the stamped concrete sidewalk (in a herringbone pattern) and the stamped concrete stoop be of a cream color to match the existing limestone found on the home. The homeowners agreed to the recommendations. Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve with staff recommendations (items #1-3) and the following requirements: 1. Stamped concrete shall be used at the sidewalk in a herringbone pattern in a light color to match the existing brick on the home; 2. Stamped concrete shall be used at the stoop with a smooth top and a rough finish edge to mimic limestone—the color to match as close as possible to the limestone on the home; 3. The stoop shall be enlarged 4 inches with a 1" overhang lip; 4. The stoop shall maintain the original curve of the existing steps; 5. The columns shall be moved outward so that the capitals extend beyond the header. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed unanimously. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 8 of 18 419-421 N. Spring Street— Restoration of original siding The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to restore the original siding on the house and replace any missing architectural features. The house was formerly clad with aluminum substitute siding.The applicant obtained a COA for the removal with the condition that Staff conduct a site inspection following the completion of the siding removal. Staff conducted a site assessment on August 1, 2017. At that time the substitute siding was removed. It was found that the original siding (clapboards) was in good condition with select areas in need of replacement including several window sills, window trim, and corner boards. In addition,the window hoods, bed molding, drip edge and colonettes at north elevation bay window were removed when the substitute siding was installed and are proposed to be recreated to match the existing profile found on the home.There is an oval window on the south elevation that is proposed to be recreated with either a glass window or a black painted panel set into a frame. The reasoning is the window is covered up with drywall at the interior. The aluminum soffits are proposed to remain, unless applicant applies for the Substitute Siding Removal Grant. If application is accepted, than all substitute siding shall be removed from the home and original elements restored with spot replacement to match in kind at deteriorated/beyond repair areas. To note,the home was built sometime in the 1880s. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Wood Siding A. Should be repaired rather than replaced, if original. If replacement is necessary, wood siding and shingles should be replaced with new cement board or shingles to match the original in size, placement, and design. Wood that has been concealed beneath synthetic sidings such as aluminum, asbestos, or vinyl should be repaired and the synthetic sidings removed. Following the removal of synthetic sidings the original siding should be repaired to match the original, caulked and painted. If the "ghosts" or outlines of decorative missing features are revealed,these should generally be replicated and reinstalled. If these features are not replaced they should be recorded through photographs or drawings for future replication. B. Should be insulated if the addition of the insulation does not result in alterations to the siding. The creation of plugs or holes for blown-in insulation is not acceptable. C. Should have original asbestos shingles kept stained or painted. If asbestos shingle siding is deteriorated or poses a health hazard, it may be removed and replaced with wood or other substitute siding. Removal of asbestos siding should follow hazardous material guidelines. D. Should not be concealed beneath synthetic materials such as vinyl, masonite, or aluminum, if original. Original siding should also not be concealed beneath wood based materials such as particle board, gyp board, or press board. These materials generally do not possess textures or designs which closely match original wood siding. However, Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 9 of 18 if more than 50% of the original siding material is damaged beyond repair, or missing, substitute materials may be applied if the following conditions are met: a. the existing damaged siding materials are removed prior to the installation of substitute materials; b. Vinyl material is not permissible. Rather, cement board is and should be smooth without knots and be accented with trim c. Finger jointed board stock is acceptable, however, natural continuous board stock is preferable for use as siding. The application of these materials must not result in the concealment of or removal of original decorative detailing or trim including window and door surrounds. However, if no trim or surrounds exist then new wood trim in the form of fascia, corner boards, base boards, molding and windows should be installed. Substitute materials should match the dimensions of the original wood siding as closely as possible. The cement board should abut the wood trim and be caulked to prevent moisture damage. Paint Removal and Surface Preparation A. Should be performed by manual scraping or by using appropriate chemical removers. A paint shaver may be used, but with caution so as to avoid removal of wood siding. B. Should be performed cautiously when removing paint through heat plates or heat guns to avoid unnecessary damage to the wood through charring or fire. C. Should not be removed by abrasive techniques such as sand or water blasting since this can damage the wood and introduce moisture into the building. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. Damaged siding shall be repaired, epoxy preferred 2. Nail holes must be patched with putty, epoxy preferred. 3. New siding shall be installed only as necessary with replacements-in-kind to match the original siding profile, size and details. 4. All replacement wood material shall be clear (no knots), cedar and installed smooth side out. 5. All deteriorated trim boards, window hoods, bed molding, crown molding and sills that are beyond repair or missing shall match the existing in kind. 6. The window hoods shall be recreated to match the size, profile and design found on the existing home. 7. The colonettes at north elevation window bay shall be recreated using shadow lines found on the home. 8. Bed molding shall be recreated and installed along the frieze board. 9. Drip edge shall be recreated and installed along water table. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 10 of 18 10. The oval window shall be recreated per the specifications indicated by the Design Review Subcommittee. 11. Entire home shall be prepped, primed and painted. Felipe and Cathy Covarrubias(owners) were present for tonight's COA discussion: The Commissioners applauded the homeowners for taking the step to restore their home. They noted that for the oval window, if the homeowners are not removing the drywall that is beyond,that a smooth wood panel (MDO) should be painted with black gloss paint set into a frame. This would give an appearance that the window has glass and would cover the drywall on the interior. The Commissioners also asked staff to provide the owners with a sketch of a profile for the more elaborate window hoods. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: If the owners are not removing the drywall that is at the interior, the oval window should have a smooth wood panel (MDO) that is painted with black gloss paint set into a frame. If the owners plan to open up the drywall at the window,then glass set in a frame shall be installed. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. 163 Hill Avenue—Fence installation The property owner has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to replace the existing wood picket fence along the north rear and side yard with a 5'-0" wood fence (4'-0" high solid with 1' high lattice work). The applicant stated that the new fence will match the neighbor's fence (159 Hill Avenue) that was installed in 2002 on the Southeast portion of the property. The applicant also noted that they would prefer not to stain or paint the fence for consistency as the fence separating their yard and 159 Hill Avenue is also not painted. To note, the current, picket fence is 4'-0" in height and extends past the rear corner of the home 21'-0". Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Fences A. Should be proportionate to the house and the design should be compatible with the character of the building and district. B. Should be painted white or a trim color related to the house, never left to weather or given a stain finish. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 11 of 18 C. Of cat iron or other material of original design should be preserved. D. Of cast iron may be added to buildings constructed in the late 19th and early 20th century. Cast iron fences are generally not appropriate for dwellings built after 1920. E. If placed along common property lines should not be placed against another fence - double line fencing is not permitted. F. Should have posts that are set a minimum of 30 inches below grade and no more than eight feet apart. G. If wood, be of cedar, redwood or pressure treated pine, cypress or other rot resistant wood. H. That has a decorative gate or arbors must be submitted with a drawing complete with dimensions. Fences in Front Yards I. Should be no higher than 36 inches with posts being slightly higher and having caps. J. Should have pickets no wider than four inches with spacing between boards a minimum of one inch up to the width of the board depending on the design of the fence K. If applicable to the layout, should have a minimum of corner posts, end posts, and gate posts which are slightly taller than the fence and five to ten inches thick with a cap and finial. Line posts can be visible and decorative to compliment the main posts or e hidden behind the picket design. Fences which cross a driveway or walkway should have gate posts. Gates should be designed to swing onto the walkway or driveway, not onto the public sidewalk. Fences in Rear Yard L. Built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. M. Built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. N. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard. 0. Of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. P. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the historic districts. Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval as the height (5'-0") in the side yard does not meet the Historic District Guidelines. However, should the Design Review Subcommittee approve the proposed, staff would then recommend the following: 1. The fence shall be no higher than 5'-0" at the side yard with 1'-0" of the fence as lattice. 2. The fence shall match the style found at 159 Hill Avenue. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 12 of 18 No representation for this COA was present for tonight's COA discussion, therefore the item was tabled. 456 Douglas Avenue—Window and door replacement (rear) The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to replace the 1970s windows and doors with new wood windows to match windows found on the other areas of the home and install new french doors at the rear as well as new rear landing and stairs. The proposed work will be completed at the west and north elevations. The west elevation is visible from Seneca Street and the work being completed at the north elevation is visible from Douglas Avenue. The work being completed at the west elevation, off of the kitchen, will include removal of the existing door and the 1970s slider window and then installing new wood, double-hung windows with trim to match the existing original trim and window found adjacent to the rear kitchen door.The windows will be spaced equally. The existing, original window will be replaced as it is in poor condition, however the trim will remain. The trim around the door will also be reused in the installation of the new window at this location. The applicant noted that there are currently three doors that have access into the kitchen and is there reasoning to remove the door at this location. The work being completed at the north elevation will include the removal of the existing French doors and installing two double-hung windows—side by side, with matching trim found on the original windows. French doors will then be installed at the area of the shed roof with door trim to match the rest of the home. In addition, the landing and stairs that will be constructed at this location will match design elements found at the front porch. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 13 of 18 cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins.True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Porches K. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing L. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement M. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. N. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) 0. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). P. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. Q. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. R. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. S. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling T. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing D. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. E. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 14 of 18 F. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Porch Staircases and Steps E. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. F. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber.The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. H. Should have newel posts and balusters, treads and risers, to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Windows and Doors 1. That the proposed bathroom window shall be 1/1 double-hung, wood, and must match in kind to the existing windows. 2. Window glass shall not be tinted but glass can be obscured at this location. 3. The trim around the windows and doors shall match, in kind, to the original windows found on the home. 4. The door at the west elevation shall be salvaged or kept on the property to be possibly reused at a later date. Rear Porch 1. All rear porch elements to match design details found at the front porch including design and size of newel posts, handrails, and balustrade. 2. That the stair treads shall 5/4" x 12 (recommended) or 2x12 and bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable) to adhere board to framing. 3. The flooring shall be 1x4 tongue and groove and installed perpendicular to the house. Pressure treated wood or composite material (recommended) is acceptable. 4. Skirting shall be simpler than what is found at the front porch and shall be 1x4 vertical slats spaced 1" apart with a top rimboard of 1x6 or 1x8 with a bottom rimboard of 1x4 and a 1x8 cornerboards. 5. That all other details match the attached rendering. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 15 of 18 6. All rear porch details shall be primed and painted. Andrew Scheeler(owner) was present for tonight's COA discussion: The Commissioners stated that the only comments they had regarding the proposed work included that there is a spacer(casing) between the double windows at the north elevation where the central casing was the same width as the side casings and that the sill at the west elevation ran all the way across from the start of the first window to the last window. Motion made by Committee Member Ristow to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1. That there is a spacer (central casing) between the double windows at the north elevation to match the same width as the outer casing and 2.that the sill at the west elevation windows is to run along the entire length from the first window to the last. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. 384 St. Charles Street— Rear egress stair replacement and construction of addition over rear basement entrance. The property owner has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to rebuild the rear porch on the building and construction of an addition that will lead into the basement The rear deck and access to the building is proposed to be rebuilt. However because of the lower visibility of the structure from the street, the property owner is proposing a simpler design. The stair structure is minimally visible from the street and the proposed addition would not be visible from the street. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches: A. should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing. B. should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale, and placement. C. should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 16 of 18 D. should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick). E. should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house, or with decorative wood framed skirting,vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. should not be removed if original to the dwelling. J. should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Additions A. should be located at the rear of dwellings, not on the front or readily visible areas of the sides of dwellings. B. should be secondary (smaller and simpler)than the original dwelling in scale, design, and placement. C. should be of a compatible design in keeping with the original dwelling's design, roof shape, materials, color, and location of window, door, and cornice heights, etc. D. should impact the exterior walls of the original dwelling as minimally as possible. When building additions use existing door and window openings for connecting the addition to the dwelling. E. should be constructed to avoid extensive removal or loss of historic materials and to not damage or destroy significant original architectural features Staff Recommendation: Rear Egress Stairs Staff does not recommend approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted. Staff would recommend approval if the following conditions are met: 1. The porch deck shall be rebuilt in the same footprint as currently constructed. 2. The top rail shall be a 2x4 with chamfered corners to allow for water runoff. 3. A bottom rail shall also be installed to be a 2x4 with chamfered edges 4. Balusters shall be no less than 2x2 spaced no greater than 2.5 inches apart 5. The handrails down the stairs at the landings and bottom steps should end in a square, 6x6 wrapped newel post, topped with a post cap. 6. The porch floor shall overhang the frame board by no less than 1 inch. 7. All porch elements to be primed and painted. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 17 of 18 If the rear, egress stairs are approved as proposed due to lack of visibility from the street, staff recommends that the Design Review Subcommittee recommend the following: 1. All porch elements to be primed and painted. Rear Addition Staff does not recommend approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted. Staff would recommend approval if the following conditions are met: 1. The siding is clear cedar (no knots) or fiber cement board (smooth —no wood grain) with an exposure of 4%". 2. The cornerboards shall be no less than 4 inches wide and shall sit proud of the siding. 3. The trim around the door shall be no less than 4 inches wide with a drip cap installed at the 4 inch header casing. 4. A friezeboard shall be installed at the top of the walls and the soffit to be no less than 6 inches wide. Bedmolding shall also be installed to run along the friezeboard and the soffit. 5. The roof gable shall extend past the addition walls at least 6". 6. The roofing shall be architectural shingles. Enrique Castel(architect- representative) was present for tonight's COA discussion: The Commissioners asked that the design follows staff recommendations. The architect stated that this would be an easy change and agreed to those recommendations.The Commissioners noted that there isn't much space to work with for the basement addition, however they asked that the gutters were to be removed and that there are still cornerboards to be made as wide as they can to accommodate the door and where the foundation is located. They also stated that having pitched metal cellar doors would also be appropriate for the basement entrance. The architect stated that he will look into that option for a design to discuss with the homeowner. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1. The cornerboards at the basement addition shall be made as wide as possible; 2.That the header at the door shall abut into the cornerboards and have a drip cap installed on top of it; 3. that the gutters are to be removed; 4. That pitched metal cellar doors may be installed instead of the addition. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. _ The motion passed unanimously. Design Review Subcommittee—August 8, 2017 Page 18 of 18 ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: Staff commented on a recent approval of a porch with 3-tab shingles as the main body of the home still had 3-tab and was not proposed to be replaced.The Commissioners agreed that installing 3-tab at the porch to match the main body of the home was correct. However, when the main body of the roof is proposed to be replaced, it shall be replaced with architectural shingles, of which, staff agreed. CORRESPONDENCE: Commissioner Roberson noted that the materials that were placed at 459 N. Spring Street were removed as the owner is looking for new contractors for the work and did not want the material to be damaged. ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Roberson. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 7:47 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Approved: Christen Sundquist Historic Preservation Planner August 22, 2017 Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, September 12, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. August 22, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business 1. 163 Hill Avenue - Fence installation F. New Business 1. 411 Arlington Avenue - Replace vinyl windows with aluminum clad wood windows 2. 715 Brook Street - Remove rear deck, construct side porch to match elements on front porch 3. 277 Lessenden Place - Removal of one window; Reduce size of one window; replace side door 4. 273 N Spring Street - Restoration of existing house; new garage 5. 277 N Spring Street - Construction of a new house; new garage G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 (TDD (847) 931-5616} PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. r Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission September 12,2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Rebecca Hunter, Bill Ristow,John Roberson, Dennis Roxworthy, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Lynne Diamond and Scott Savel CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Ristow to approve the minutes of August 22, 2017, with an amendment to page 3 (treated lumber—dry kilned). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed 4-0-1(Abstain: Hunter). RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: Brian Anderson, Commissioner for Elgin Heritage Commission PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business 163 Hill Avenue- Fence installation New Business 411 Arlington Avenue- Replace vinyl windows with aluminum clad wood windows 715 Brook Street- Remove rear deck, construct side porch to match elements on front porch 277 Lessenden Place- Removal of one window; Reduce size of one window; replace side door 273 N Spring Street- Restoration of existing house; new garage 277 N Spring Street- Construction of a new house; new garage ITEMS TABLED: None Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 2 of 22 OLD BUSINESS: Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to un-table items El for discussion (representatives for the properties in attendance for tonight's meeting). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. 163 Hill Avenue- Fence installation The property owner has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness(COA)to replace the existing wood picket fence along the north rear and side yard with a 5'-0" wood fence (4'-0" high solid with 1' high lattice work). The applicant stated that the new fence will match the neighbor's fence (159 Hill Avenue)that was installed in 2002 on the Southeast portion of the property. The applicant also noted that they would prefer not to stain or paint the fence for consistency as the fence separating their yard and 159 Hill Avenue is also not painted. To note, the current, picket fence is 4'-0" in height and extends past the rear corner of the home 21'-0". Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Fences A. Should be proportionate to the house and the design should be compatible with the character of the building and district. B. Should be painted white or a trim color related to the house, never left to weather or given a stain finish. C. Of cat iron or other material of original design should be preserved. D. Of cast iron may be added to buildings constructed in the late 19th and early 20th century. Cast iron fences are generally not appropriate for dwellings built after 1920. E. If placed along common property lines should not be placed against another fence- double line fencing is not permitted. F. Should have posts that are set a minimum of 30 inches below grade and no more than eight feet apart. G. If wood, be of cedar, redwood or pressure treated pine, cypress or other rot resistant wood. H. That has a decorative gate or arbors must be submitted with a drawing complete with dimensions. Fences in Front Yards I. Should be no higher than 36 inches with posts being slightly higher and having caps. J. Should have pickets no wider than four inches with spacing between boards a minimum of one inch up to the width of the board depending on the design of the fence Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 3 of 22 K. If applicable to the layout, should have a minimum of corner posts, end posts, and gate posts which are slightly taller than the fence and five to ten inches thick with a cap and finial. Line posts can be visible and decorative to compliment the main posts or e hidden behind the picket design. Fences which cross a driveway or walkway should have gate posts. Gates should be designed to swing onto the walkway or driveway, not onto the public sidewalk. Fences in Rear Yard L. Built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. M. Built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. N. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard. 0. Of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. P. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the historic districts.Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff cannot recommend approval as the height (5'-0") in the side yard does not meet the Historic District Guidelines. However, should the Design Review Subcommittee approve the proposed, staff would then recommend the following: 1. The fence shall be no higher than 5'-0" at the side yard with 1'-0" of the fence as lattice. 2. The fence shall match the style found at 159 Hill Avenue. Mike Burns(property owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Current fence sits lower than the northern neighbor's fence. Motion made by Committee Member Ristow to approve the COA as submitted with staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion was approved unanimously (5-0). NEW BUSINESS: 411 Arlington Avenue- Replace vinyl windows with aluminum clad wood windows The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness request to replace five (5)vinyl windows found at the north, east and west elevations—second floor with aluminum clad wood, double-hung, 1/1 windows. The applicant is proposing to install Casco, double-hung replacement kit windows and will borrow design elements(replication of central window casing/mullion from the second floor Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 4 of 22 window-west elevation at 409 Arlington Avenue. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes(glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins.True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. That all windows shall be 1/1 double-hung, aluminum clad wood and must fit original window openings. 2. At the paired windows, central casing shall be installed all the way through the opening creating two separate windows versus one whole unit. 3. Window glass shall not be tinted. 4. All other details match the submitted specifications. 5. That all other details meet the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. Ismael Espinosa (property owner) and Jose Espinosa (son/translator) were present for tonight's COA discussion: Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 5 of 22 Interior window trim is still present. Applicant is aware of the requirements and is willing to install middle casing/mullions for the "paired" windows. Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve the COA as submitted with staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion was approved unanimously (5-0). 715 Brook Street- Remove rear deck,construct side porch to match elements on front porch The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)to remove the existing rear deck at the north elevation and replace it with a deck with details that match the front porch elements. The existing deck is approximately 8' x 14' and will be reduced to approximately 4' x 8'.The deck is visible from the public way but will be less so due to the reduction in size and the existing fence. Elements including the newel posts, spindles, handrails will match those found at the front porch.The decking proposed will be 5/4" x 5.5" treated decking to extend past skirting at least 1 inch.The stairs are also proposed to be split tread made of 5/4" treated wood. The skirting proposed is simple 1x4 vertical boards spaced 1 inch apart installed behind the a 6 inch top rimboard, and 4 inch bottom rimboard.The skirting will also have 8" cornerboards. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 6 of 22 I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber.The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. Should have newel posts and balusters, treads and risers, to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Rear Porch 1. All rear porch elements to match design details found at the front porch including design and size of newel posts, handrails, and balustrade. 2. That the stair treads may be split treads of treated 5/4" lumber to extend past riser 1 inch or they may be 5/4" x 12 (recommended) or 2x12 and bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable)to adhere board to framing. 3. The flooring shall be 5/4" by 5 %2"treated decking. 4. Skirting shall be 1x4 vertical slats spaced 1" apart with a top rimboard of 1x6 or 1x8 with a bottom rimboard of 1x4 and a 1x8 cornerboards. 5. That all other details match the attached rendering. All rear porch details shall be primed and painted. Tammy Zielke (property owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: 1x6 top rimboard is appropriate due to decking being so close to the grade. Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 7 of 22 Motion made by Committee Member Hunter to approve the COA as submitted with staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion was approved unanimously (5-0). 277 Lessenden Place- Removal of one window; Reduce size of one window; replace side door The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to raise the existing,first floor kitchen sill at the south elevation to align with the adjacent kitchen window sill and installation of a new, aluminum-clad wood insert window.The applicant is also seeking approval for the removal of an existing double-hung window located at the kitchen off of the rear porch. The applicant noted that they are remodeling the home and to maximize the efficiency of the kitchen,they are proposing to raise the south elevation window and remove the west elevation window at the rear porch. The porch window will be covered with clear cedar, no knots to match the existing siding in kind.The new, shortened window will keep the historic casing and raise the sill to the height of the adjacent window sill. The windows that are proposed to be removed will be used to repair the existing windows in the house. Although the rear porch is visible from the public way,the proposed work is not. The applicant is also proposing to install a new exterior door at the rear porch as the existing is an interior door. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). C. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 8 of 22 windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins.True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 6. That the proposed new kitchen window shall be 1/1 double-hung, wood or aluminum- clad wood and shall fit the width of the original window opening. 7. Window glass shall not be tinted but glass can be obscured at this location. 8. The kitchen window sill must align with the adjacent kitchen window. 9. The sill to be relocated, if in good condition, shall be retained and reinstalled at proposed location. If sill is beyond repair, a new sill shall be recreated to match the original in size, design and profile. 10.The siding to cover over the window opening at the rear porch shall weave into the existing siding. It shall be clear cedar, no knots to match the same exposure, size and design as the existing siding. The new proposed door shall be either wood or of smooth fiberglass with four panels (2 lites over 2 panels or 4 panels-no glass). Kirk Hodge (property owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Committee expressed the larger"shorter" window on the left, should be reduced to match the size on the right (for uniformity). The window could be installed to match the other window on the same elevation. Committee acknowledged the windows are on the rear of the house and are not visible from a public right of way. Committee agreed, replacement door with or with glass panel is appropriate. Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve the COA as submitted with staff recommends, amended by the following committee's requirements: 1) Staff to approve window width (on rear of house)to match in size or leave window width as is. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion was approved unanimously (5-0). Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 9 of 22 273 N Spring Street- Restoration of existing house; new garage The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for full rehabilitation of 273 N. Spring Street.This includes removal of the substitute siding, restoring the original siding underneath and recreating missing architectural features; construction of new front and side porch; restoration of existing windows; installation of new casement windows to meet egress at bedroom locations; installation of new windows at select areas.The COA is also proposing construction of a new garage. This project is being completed in conjunction with 277 N. Spring Street which includes modifying the parcel lines to allow for a driveway and garage on both lots. At this time,the existing substitute siding has not been removed. However, when work begins on the home, staff will require an inspection when the substitute siding is removed to assess the condition of the original siding and any missing architectural features including but not limited to the window hoods, bed molding, crown molding, corner boards, drip edge at water table and front porch elements.The adjacent home at 269 N. Spring Street is similar in style to 273 N. Spring Street and was used as a basis for the design at the front porch stoop roof and brackets. Windows located at bedroom locations found at the north elevation, second floor are proposed to be replaced with casement, egress windows with simulated meeting rails and divided lites. This includes replacing two original windows and removal of a small,fixed window and enlarging the window opening to match the size and details as the adjacent windows.The windows located at the mudroom are proposed to be removed and replaced with two double- hung windows to match the same design, size and style as the original windows. At the south elevation,the windows at the first floor will be restored, however, a small double- hung window at the rear will be removed to allow for a more functional kitchen.The second floor window located at the stairs will also be relocated to accommodate the proposed interior modifications. A small fixed window at the second floor at this elevation is also proposed to be removed due to a closet being installed at this location. At the east elevation, a new double-hung window is proposed to be installed at the second floor to match the details found at the existing windows along with two side-by-side double hung windows at the first floor off of the kitchen. An existing fixed window at the mudroom is proposed to be removed and the exterior access to the basement as well. The new garage is proposed to be 20' x 24' and will borrow design elements from the existing home including the pitch of the roof(8/12), window and door design and will be constructed out of hardiboard. Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 10 of 22 Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber.The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. Should have newel posts and balusters, treads and risers, to match original porch construction. Wood Siding A. Should be repaired rather than replaced, if original. If replacement is necessary, wood siding and shingles should be replaced with new cement board or shingles to match the Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 11 of 22 original in size, placement, and design. Wood that has been concealed beneath synthetic sidings such as aluminum, asbestos, or vinyl should be repaired and the synthetic sidings removed. Following the removal of synthetic sidings the original siding should be repaired to match the original, caulked and painted. If the "ghosts" or outlines of decorative missing features are revealed,these should generally be replicated and reinstalled. If these features are not replaced they should be recorded through photographs or drawings for future replication. B. Should be insulated if the addition of the insulation does not result in alterations to the siding.The creation of plugs or holes for blown-in insulation is not acceptable. C. Should have original asbestos shingles kept stained or painted. If asbestos shingle siding is deteriorated or poses a health hazard, it may be removed and replaced with wood or other substitute siding. Removal of asbestos siding should follow hazardous material guidelines. D. Should not be concealed beneath synthetic materials such as vinyl, masonite, or aluminum, if original. Original siding should also not be concealed beneath wood based materials such as particle board, gyp board, or press board.These materials generally do not possess textures or designs which closely match original wood siding. However, if more than 50%of the original siding material is damaged beyond repair, or missing, substitute materials may be applied if the following conditions are met: a. the existing damaged siding materials are removed prior to the installation of substitute materials; b. Vinyl material is not permissible. Rather, cement board is and should be smooth without knots and be accented with trim c. Finger jointed board stock is acceptable, however, natural continuous board stock is preferable for use as siding. The application of these materials must not result in the concealment of or removal of original decorative detailing or trim including window and door surrounds. However, if no trim or surrounds exist then new wood trim in the form of fascia, corner boards, base boards, molding and windows should be installed. Substitute materials should match the dimensions of the original wood siding as closely as possible. The cement board should abut the wood trim and be caulked to prevent moisture damage. Paint Removal and Surface Preparation A. Should be performed by manual scraping or by using appropriate chemical removers.A paint shaver may be used, but with caution so as to avoid removal of wood siding. B. Should be performed cautiously when removing paint through heat plates or heat guns to avoid unnecessary damage to the wood through charring or fire. C. Should not be removed by abrasive techniques such as sand or water blasting since this can damage the wood and introduce moisture into the building. Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 12 of 22 D. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary, the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins.True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Siding-OPTION 1 1. Upon removal of the siding, that Staff be consulted to conduct a condition assessment and make a determination as to the percentage of damaged siding. 2. If less than 50%is damaged than the existing siding shall be preserved/rehabilitated. 3. Damaged siding shall be repaired, epoxy preferred. 4. Nail holes must be patched with putty, epoxy preferred. 5. Spot replacement with new siding (clear cedar—no knots) shall be installed only as necessary with replacements-in-kind to match the original siding profile and exposure. 6. All replacement wood material shall be clear(no knots), cedar preferred and installed smooth side out. 7. Missing architectural features including but not limited to; window hoods, bed molding, corner boards, drip edge at water table, crown molding, brackets, beadboard etc. shall be recreated to match shadows and similar designs that are appropriate for this style of home. 8. All deteriorated elements that are beyond repair shall match the existing in kind. 9. Siding shall be sanded, primed and painted. Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 13 of 22 Siding-OPTION 2 1. Upon removal of the siding, that Staff be consulted to conduct a condition assessment and make a determination as to the percentage of damaged siding. 2. If more than 50%of the original siding appears to be damaged, replacement siding in a profile to match the original siding in exposure, and size is acceptable. 3. The replacement siding may be clear cedar, no knots (preferred) installed smooth side out or fiber cement board siding(smooth—no wood grain). 4. All new elements to be prepped, primed and painted. Front Porch 1. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, %" cove molding placed on either side of spindle or A"coved sub-rail, 2x2 square, decorative balusters to match existing in style, with a maximum of 3" on center.That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. 2. That the stair treads shall 5/4" x 12 (recommended) or 2x12 and bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable) to adhere board to framing. 3. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs, at existing location. 4. That the newel posts shall be 6x6 topped with a ball cap. 5. The flooring shall be 1x4 tongue and groove and installed perpendicular to the house. Pressure treated wood or composite material (recommended) is acceptable. 6. The skirting shall 1x4 vertical boards with 1" gap between boards placed behind the 1x6 or 1x8 top rimboard and 1x4 bottom rimboard. A 1x8 cornerboard shall be installed as well as a 1x4 vertical frame board to abut against the house to sit flush with the top and bottom rimboard. 7. The front porch stoop roof shall be hipped with crown molding, box beam and a beadboard ceiling. Proposed bracket design to have final approval by staff. 8. All front porch details shall match the attached drawing. 9. All front porch details shall be primed and painted. Side Porch 1. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, 3%" cove molding placed on either side of spindle or%"coved sub-rail, 2x2 square, decorative balusters to match existing in style, with a maximum of 3" on center.That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. 2. That the stair treads shall 5/4" x 12 (recommended) or 2x12 and bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable) to adhere board to framing. 3. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs, at existing location. 4. That the newel posts shall be 6x6 topped with a ball cap. 5. The flooring shall be 1x4 tongue and groove and installed perpendicular to the house. Pressure treated wood or composite material (recommended) is acceptable. Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 14 of 22 6. The skirting shall 1x4 vertical boards with 1" gap between boards placed behind the 1x6 or 1x8 top rimboard and 1x4 bottom rimboard. A 1x8 cornerboard shall be installed as well as a 1x4 vertical frame board to abut against the house to sit flush with the top and bottom rimboard. 7. All side porch details shall match the attached drawing. 8. All side porch details shall be primed and painted. Windows 1. The casement windows (wood or aluminum-clad wood)will be designed with a horizontal simulated meeting rail and simulated divided lites (installed on the exterior and interior of the glazing) and shall maintain the existing opening size and existing trim. 2. The remaining windows on the home that are proposed to be new shall be 1/1 double-hung and must match in kind to the existing windows with simulated divided lites (2 over 2) and shall be trimmed out in a manner similar to the existing windows on the house. 3. Window glass shall not be tinted. 4. All other windows shall be restored (scraped, painted, new ropes/reattach to weights, weather stripping, etc.). Garage 1. That the proposed garage siding material will be fiber cement board and installed smooth side out (no wood grain) in a profile and exposure to match the house's existing wood siding. 2. That the siding and trim is to be painted a color to match or complement the house colors. 3. That the garage roof matches the house in slope and form (8:12 pitch,front gable). 4. That the eaves shall be enclosed but not be boxed to match eaves of existing house and shall extend a minimum of 12 inches away from the garage wall. 5. That the frieze board dimensions match existing house. The frieze board shall be painted. 6. All other details to match the submitted drawings and the Design Review Subcommittee's recommendations. General Note All other details to match the attached drawings. Mike Spillane (Spillane&Sons)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Mr. Spillane believes there is no siding on the rear elevation. Once the asphalt siding is removed the true profile (if any)will be known. This wall will be part of the mud room. The side staircase currently located off the north elevation of the house will be moved to the east elevation. The area is currently part of an interior closet. Existing northern doorway will be sided and the new doorway opening will allow for straighter driveway from the street, along the house,towards the new garage. Garage size discrepancy noted (site plan 20'x20' vs staff report and drawings indicate 20'x24'). Site plan is stated in error. Garage to be constructed is proposed as 20'x24'. Additionally,the driveway will comply with the 3' interior setback required by zoning. Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 15 of 22 Rather than one wide overhead garage door (not typical for historic district), two smaller insulated overhead garage doors will be installed with stamped raised panels. Commission noted the service door of the new garage faces into the rear yard of the lot. Service door is not visible from a street yard. Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve the COA as submitted with staff recommendations and amended by committee comments as follows: 1) side door moved to rear elevation, 2) opening of side door to be filled in with new siding being "weaved in", and 3) applicant must return to commission if more than 50%of the house siding is missing or beyond repair. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion was approved unanimously(5-0). 277 N Spring Street-Construction of a new house; new garage The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) for development of the vacant property with a new single family home, garage and fence.The property is a corner lot bordered by N. Spring Street and Franklin Boulevard.The previous building was demolished in 2007 by the city after approval was granted by the Elgin Heritage Commission. This project is being completed in conjunction with 273 N. Spring Street which includes modifying the parcel lines to allow for a driveway and garage on both lots. The new home borrows elements from the American Foursquare style.The home will be set back on the lot in keeping with the location of the homes adjacent to it.The size is also proportional to the neighborhood. The new garage is proposed to be 20' x 24' and will borrow design elements from the existing home including the pitch of the roof(8/12), window and door design and will be constructed out of hardiboard. A 36" high fence is also being proposed around what would be considered the rear yard. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: New Construction A. should maintain, not disrupt, the existing pattern of surrounding historic buildings along the street by being similar in: 1. Shape.Variations of asymmetrical, rectangular, and square forms are most appropriate for the locally designated districts; 2. Scale (height and width). New construction should not vary more than one-half story from the predominate building height typical of dwellings along a block. In most blocks of the designated districts this would require new construction to be no more then two-and-one-half stories; Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 16 of 22 3. Orientation to the street. Most dwellings in Elgin's locally designated districts have their primary facades and main entrances oriented towards the street and this characteristic should be maintained in any new construction; 4. Roof shape and pitch. Roof slope ratio for new construction should be a minimum of 6:12 to a maximum of 12:12 (6:12 refers to six inches of rise to 12 inches of run in measuring slopes). Roof forms of gable and hipped variations are more common on most blocks than roof forms which are flat, mansard, or gambrel forms; 5. Placement on the lot. Front and side yard setbacks should respect the setbacks found along the block on which the building is sited. 6. Location and proportion of porches,entrances, and divisional bays. Porches should have roof forms of gable, hipped or shed design and at least cover the entrance. Porches extending partially or fully across the front of the building are recommended. Porches should have columns and railings with balusters that are traditional in design and compatible with the overall character of the building. 7. Location and proportion of windows. New window openings should be rectangular in shape. Window proportions on the main facade should not exceed three-to-one in the height/width ratio or be any less than two-to-one in the height/width ratio (two- to-one proportions are preferred). No horizontal sash, casement, or awning type windows should be placed on the fronts of buildings. Special window types (i.e. oriel, bay, stained, beveled glass) may be considered when compatible with the new structure's design as well as the surrounding area; 8. Foundation height. Height of foundations should generally be similar to foundation heights in the area. Foundation heights can increase along the sides or at the rear of a building if necessary to follow slope contours. No slab foundations or at-grade foundations should be utilized on the fronts or readily visible sides of buildings; 9. Porch height and depth. Porch heights and depths should be consistent with those of adjacent dwellings; 10. Material and material color. Foundations: Most historic dwelling foundations are of stone or cast concrete and new construction should continue the appearance of these foundation materials. Poured concrete, concrete block, and split faced concrete are acceptable foundation materials. Stucco or other finishes are recommended to provide a textured surface. Brick Dwellings: If the new construction is of brick, the brick should closely match typical mortar and brick color tones found in the locally designated districts and along the block. White or light mortars provide too much contrast with typical dark brick colors and should be avoided. Frame Dwellings: If the new construction is of frame, the preferred exterior material is wood or a material which is similar to original materials in the area like clapboard, shingle, stucco, etc.The use of cement board siding, or similar materials is acceptable if it meets size recommendations and proper construction detailing of traditional siding materials. If wood siding is used; its exposure should reflect the Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 17 of 22 exposure of traditional wood siding. Windows:Wood construction is preferred for windows. However, the use of aluminum clad windows is also acceptable as long as they are sized to be compatible with historic window openings.The use of dark tinted windows, reflective glass and coatings for windows is discouraged on readily visible sides of buildings. 11. Details and texture. The details and textures of building materials should be applied in a manner consistent with traditional construction methods and compatible with surrounding structures; B. Replications. Replications are new buildings which closely imitate historic dwellings typically found in the historic district. Replications are acceptable if they are consistent with historic dwellings in their overall form and plan, porch design and placement,window and door treatments, roof forms, and architectural details. It is important for replications to be identified as new construction through the use of signs, or plaques prominently displayed on the front of the building. Replication of specific structure Secondary Buildings:Garages,Sheds, Other Outbuildings A. Should be smaller in scale than the dwelling; clearly secondary in nature. B. Should be simple in design but reflecting the general character of the associated dwelling. For example, use gable roof forms if the dwelling has a gable roof, hipped roof forms if the dwelling has a hipped roof etc. C. Should be built at traditional locations for outbuildings in the locally designated districts. These include at rear lot lines, adjacent to alleys, and at the back side of a dwelling; D. Should be compatible in design, shape, materials, and roof shape to the associated dwelling; E. Should be of an exterior material to match the associated dwelling such as clapboard, stucco, or brick. However, if not readily visible from the street, secondary buildings may have exterior substitute siding materials such as cement fiber board with appropriate trim and exposure and cementitious materials. F. Should be of traditional materials if readily visible. For garages, wood paneled doors are more appropriate than paneled doors of vinyl, aluminum, or steel. Wood paneled overhead roll-up doors are widely available and are appropriate for new garages. For two car garages the use of two single doors instead of one larger double door is more appropriate for use in a historic district. However, one double is unacceptable for garages of less than twenty-two feet. G. Should have windows in the garage doors are recommended, but windows may not be appropriate in every case for garage doors. H. Should have raised panel steel doors are acceptable and should be painted to match the house and set off the relief of the panels. I. Should be in designs that are more appropriate for use with traditionally designed structures, if prefabricated sheds are proposed to be used. J. Should not be constructed of rough sawn cedar with knots. Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 18 of 22 Fences A. Should be proportionate to the house and the design should be compatible with the character of the building and district. B. Should be painted white or a trim color related to the house, never left to weather or given a stain finish. C. Of cat iron or other material of original design should be preserved. D. Of cast iron may be added to buildings constructed in the late 19th and early 20th century. Cast iron fences are generally not appropriate for dwellings built after 1920. E. If placed along common property lines should not be placed against another fence - double line fencing is not permitted. F. Should have posts that are set a minimum of 30 inches below grade and no more than eight feet apart. G. If wood, be of cedar, redwood or pressure treated pine, cypress or other rot resistant wood. H. That has a decorative gate or arbors must be submitted with a drawing complete with dimensions. Fences in Front Yards A. Should be no higher than 36 inches with posts being slightly higher and having caps. B. Should have pickets no wider than four inches with spacing between boards a minimum of one inch up to the width of the board depending on the design of the fence C. If applicable to the layout, should have a minimum of corner posts, end posts, and gate posts which are slightly taller than the fence and five to ten inches thick with a cap and finial. Line posts can be visible and decorative to compliment the main posts or e hidden behind the picket design. Fences which cross a driveway or walkway should have gate posts. Gates should be designed to swing onto the walkway or driveway, not onto the public sidewalk. Fences in Rear Yard A. Built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. B. Built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. C. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard. D. Of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. E. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the historic districts. Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 19 of 22 Siding 1. Replacement siding shall be in cedar or fiber-cement board and shall be installed on the entire house with proper trim around windows, corner boards, base boards, fascia boards and soffits under roof overhangs meeting the following requirements: a. The exposure of the exterior siding is no more than 5 inch exposure. If using fiber-cement board,this siding shall be installed smooth side out (no feaux wood grain) with the same specifications as above. b. Corner boards are no less than 5 inches wide (use of 5/4" x 6" to be cut down to 1"x5"). c. Base boards/water table be no less than 8 inches wide with a drip edge installed. The water table with drip edge shall be constructed to run around the entire building. d. Siding shall be prepped, primed and painted. Windows 1. The windows shall include the following: a. Window shall be a wood or aluminum-clad wood, three and four-over-one double-hung window.The dimensions of the window including meeting rail width, styles and top and bottom rail shall be close to the attached sketch dimensions b. Window trim/casing shall be no less than 4 inches with a top board the same size or 1 inch max taller than the casing. c. The window hood/drip cap shall be of an appropriate design/crown molding approved by staff. d. The proposed windows shall have a sill that extends past the casing by at least 1 inch. Installation of an apron is optional e. The muntins(Grilles) shall be installed on the exterior and interior of the window (simulated divided lites); a spacer may be installed in between the glass as well. f. Window glass shall not be tinted Roof 1. The roof shall include the following: a. Architectural shingles shall be installed b. The soffits shall be beadboard installed perpendicular to the home c. The fascia can be proposed to be flat or with crown molding. If flat, then a K- style gutter shall be installed around the perimeter. If proposed to have a fascia with crown molding, then half-round gutters are more appropriate. d. Gutter hangers shall be installed beneath the roofing material. Porch 1. The roof shall include the following: a. The handrail shall have a 2x4 top rail with chamfered edges, %" cove moldings installed on either side of spindle or a %" coved sub-rail installed beneath top rail, 2x2 square, balusters/spindles, with a maximum of 3" on center.That the bottom rail is a 2x4 with chamfered edges, installed 2" above finished floor. b. That the stair treads shall 5/4" x 12, bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 20 of 22 acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable) to adhere board to framing. c. That the newel posts are added to the bottom of the stairs. d. That the newel posts shall be 6x6 posts topped with pyramidal cap. e. Porch columns shall be wood or fiberglass (acceptable) with a capital, a bead and base as shown in the submitted drawings. f. The flooring shall be 1x4 tongue and groove and installed perpendicular to the house. Pressure treated wood or composite material (recommended) is acceptable. g. The porch skirting shall include a 1x8 (match the size of the water table board) top rimboard with 1x4 vertical skirting boards placed behind the top and bottom rimboard, spaced 1 inch apart and a 1x4 bottom rimboard installed 1 inch above grade. 1x8 vertical frame boards shall be installed beneath newel posts and be flush with the top and bottom rimboards. h. All porch details shall be primed and painted. Garage 1. That the proposed garage siding material shall be fiber cement board and installed smooth side out (no wood grain) in a profile and exposure.Vinyl siding or Lauren Pruss Smart siding is not be permitted. 2. The siding shall have a 5" exposure to match house siding exposure. 3. That the siding and trim is to be painted a color to match or complement the house colors. lx 4 shall be used on corner boards and door casing. 4. The service door shall have a 1x4 casing and also have a 1x2 drip cap at the head casing. The door may be steel, the design to match the style of the home and be approved by staff. 5. That the garage roof matches the house in slope and form (hipped), but be no less than a 6:12 slope. 6. That the eaves shall be enclosed but not boxed to match eaves of house. 7. The header trim above the garage door shall be 1x6 or 1x8 with a 1x2 drip cap. 8. Overhead garage door shall have 1x4 casing and a 1x2 drip cap at the head casing. The door shall be of a similar style to the home. 9. Garage shall be primed and painted to match house. Fence 1. The dog ear pickets shall be 1x4. 2. All fence elements to be painted white or a complimentary color to the home. General Note All other details to match the attached drawings. Mike Spillane (Spillane&Sons)was present for tonight's COA discussion: House style proposed is typical for the neighborhood. Both overhang (12") and siding profile dimensions were discussed. Garage overhand of 12" is appropriate. Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 21 of 22 Garage size discrepancy noted (site plan 20'x20'vs staff report and drawings indicate 20'x24'). Site plan is stated in error. Garage to be constructed is proposed as 20'x24'. Rather than one wide overhead garage door(not typical for historic district),two smaller insulated overhead garage doors will be installed with stamped raised panels. On the front elevation, a vertical mullion (approximately 4" width) need to separate the lower level set of double hung windows. Site plan indicates front porch steps on north end of porch, elevation illustration indicates front porch staircase on south end of porch. Applicant indicated the porch entrance confirmed the staircase will be to the southern portion of the porch. Additionally, the porch skirting will be square (horizontal and perpetual to grade), not diagonal as illustrated. Service walk discussed. No requirement by committee. Committee indicated the 6" fence width is not appropriate to the historic district. Pickets should be no greater than 4" in width. Motion made by Committee Member Ristow to approve the COA as submitted with staff recommendations and amended by the following committee comments: 1) 2nd floor roof overhang to be increased from 12" to 24", and dormer is to have a 12" overhang, 2) 2nd floor "set of double hung windows" to be reduced to only one double hung window (if light &vent requirement is meet for room), and moved to align (close as possible) over the front door for symmetry, 3) main level of house to have a maximum 4" siding profile, 4) 1x6 header with rake moldings and capped with aluminum, 5) porch skirting to be square (not diagonal as present), 6)fence with picket width not to exceed 4", and maximum of two 2x4 horizontal boards. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion was approved unanimously (5-0). ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: 421 N Spring Street—work in progress looks really nice. 459 N Spring Street—roof has been removed (previous fire damage) Fire Barn—150th Anniversary- Saturday, September 16th from 11a-3p. Presentation at 1p. House Walk—Approximately 2,000 tickets. Videos provided outside the homes were very beneficial to keep the lines moving. Design Review Subcommittee—September 12, 2017 Page 22 of 22 CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ?....t_ ate):z„‘.(a_)__ Cindy A. Walden Approved: Design Review Subcommittee Secretary October 10, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING October 3, 2017 City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 AGENDA Meeting Commences 7:00 p.m. Roll Call: New Business: 1. Public Hearing to consider a decision of the Elgin Heritage Commission's Design Review Subcommittee made on Tuesday, August 22, 2017 to deny a request to maintain concrete block retaining wall-planters located at 272 Division Street, Elgin, IL 60120, more specifically described by the Property Index Number 06-13-155-016. A. Open Public Hearing and Welcome B. Introduction of the members of the Commission C. Explanation of Procedures D. Information on the property at 272 Division Street E. Closing Comments Adjournment C Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, October 10, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. September 12, 2017 2. September 26, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business F. New Business 1. 414 S Liberty Street— Maintaining Existing Paint Scheme— Paint Grant; Concrete block piers 2. 359 Park Street— Removal of three existing, non-original windows and replacement with stained glass windows G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616} PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. p Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission October 10, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter, Bill Ristow,John Roberson, Dennis Roxworthy, Scott Savel, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: None CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve the minutes of September 12, 2017, by amending page 21 (increased from 12" to 24"); and approve the minutes of September 26, 2017, by amending page 5 (soffit or rafter tails are present) and( rather than mitered). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed 5-0-2 for September 12 (Abstain: Diamond &Savel); and the motion passed unanimously for September 26. RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 414 S Liberty Street— Maintaining Existing Paint Scheme—Paint Grant 359 Park Street—Removal of three existing, non-original windows and replacement with stained glass windows ITEMS TABLED: None C Design Review Subcommittee—October 10, 2017 I Page2of9 r NEW BUSINESS: 414 S Liberty St—Maintaining Existing Paint Scheme—Paint Grant The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to maintain the existing paint scheme that is a part of the Exterior Paint Grant Program. On June 3, 2016, the applicant submitted an Exterior Paint Grant application and was approved. As a requirement for this application, the applicant was asked to submit paint swatches of the proposed colors. The applicant's contractor proposed colors that included a dark and light gray, purple, black and blue. Staff stated to the applicant's contractor that although these are not historically accurate colors, the applicant may still submit this paint scheme for the grant program if they keep the purple and blue colors to small details. Staff at that time took an image of the existing home and marked the areas of where the paint colors were to be applied. On September 15, 2017 staff completed an inspection of the home to find the color scheme that was approved changed, altering the purple and blue to be more prominent accents.The change in the scheme was not approved by staff and the inspection failed.The vibrancy of the purple and blue were not in character of this style of home and staff did not feel that this change could be approved over the counter. Staff noted to the applicant that if they decided to withdraw their application from the painting grant or seek approval from the Design Review Subcommittee, on the condition of their approval, the existing paint scheme could remain. The applicant noted that this paint scheme was a winner in the 2017 Chicago Paint and Coatings Association's Painted Ladies Competition. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)to maintain two concrete block piers(3' tall) installed at the private sidewalk. The COA application has been filed as a corrective action to the following violations: 1. Installation of concrete block piers in front of house The applicant noted that they had extra material from their driveway project and did not realize that a permit was needed to install the concrete block piers. Staff reminded the applicant that any work completed on the exterior with the exception of installing plantings needs to be reviewed and approved prior to work beginning. Staff noted to the applicant that there are precedents in the historic districts for brick piers at the sidewalk including 802 Douglas Avenue, 907 Douglas Avenue, 1007 Douglas Avenue, 1013 r Design Review Subcommittee—October 10, 2017 Page 3 of 9 Douglas Avenue, 1025 Douglas Avenue, 638 N Spring Street, 402 N Spring Street, and 320 N Spring Street. Staff could not find a precedent in the Watch District. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Recommendations for Paint and Paint Colors Note: this section is provided only as a recommendation for property owners on the types of paint colors that are appropriate for use on historic buildings. Property owners are free to use colors of their choice on the exterior of their properties. A. Paint should be of high quality to provide a long lasting finish. B. Paint colors should be appropriate for the dwelling's architectural style and design: • Italianate Style - Light colors for the body and trim. Body-Tan, Light Brown, Beige, Light Green, Yellow Trim and 'Accents- Cream, Gray, Light Brown • Queen Anne/Second Empire/Homestead - Diversity of colors using combinations of contrasting colors for the body and trim. Body-Tan, Red, Green, Brown Trim and Accents- Darker colors such as Dark Olive, Salmon, Red, Dark Brown • Shingle- Most Shingle style dwellings were originally built with the exterior wood shingles stained or left natural rather than painted. Most of these dwellings in Elgin have been painted over the years and a return to the dark browns and reds of the wood shingles is recommended. Body- Dark Red, Brown, Dark Gray, Dark Green Trim and Accents- Dark Green, Dark Brown • Prairie-A return to lighter colors such as yellow and white. Body- Light Tan, Light Yellow, Light Brown, Grays, Medium to Light Greens Trim and Accents-Whites and Off-Whites, Cream, Brown, Blues, Greens • Craftsman/Bungalow/Tudor Revival - Darker colors again such as earth tones. Dark stains also used in place of paint. Brick, stone, stucco, and concrete generally left unpainted. Body- Brown, Green, Gray, Dark Red Trim and Accents - Both light and dark trim colors such as Reds, Browns, Greens, and shades of Tan • Colonial Revival - Light colors predominate Body-Yellow, Light Gray, Light Blue Trim and Accents- White, Off-White, Cream Retaining walls: A. should be preserved and maintained, if original to the dwelling (or built before 1945). B. should be of poured concrete (not concrete blocks) or in stone designs such as cut stone, random rubble, coursed rubble, or cobblestones. Retaining walls of brick are less appropriate but may be constructed. If constructed of artificial or cultured stone, Design Review Subcommittee—October 10, 2017 t Page 4 of 9 textures, colors and random designs should replicate natural stone. If located in front yards, the walls should be constructed using up to two courses and an additional cap course, not to exceed twenty inches in height. C. should not be removed or replaced with new materials, if built before 1945. D. should not be built on the fronts of dwellings, if constructed of timbers or railroad ties. Staff Recommendation: Paint Staff cannot recommend approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted as this is a grant project and the colors that were painted on the home do not match what was previously approved. In addition, historically,the home would have used colors that were less vibrant than the paint colors that were chosen. Staff would recommend approval with the following conditions: 1. The purple and blue found at the wood shingles shall be subdued to a purple and blue that are not as bright/vibrant. 2. Or,the paint scheme follows the previously approved paint scheme. If the applicant decides to withdraw their grant application, the existing paint scheme may remain. Concrete Block Piers Staff cannot recommend approval of the application as submitted, since the material (concrete blocks) does not meet the material requirements of the Elgin Design Guideline Manual for Landmarks and Historic Districts. If the piers are approved as proposed, staff recommends that the Design Review Subcommittee recommend the following: 1. The material brick is installed and not concrete block. 2. A stone cap is installed on top of the brick piers. Carlos Baez and Denise Benjamin(owners) were present for tonight's COA discussion. Owners stated this is their first home purchase. They have been waiting for the painting contractor to start the painting process for about eighteen months. In the meantime,they began other projects to fix up the property in general, including the service walks, driveway and building interior. Commission acknowledged this house had won a painted lady contest in the early-mid 2000's with the paint scheme seen in the 2015 staff photo. Owners indicated the painting contractor had not presented the staff"approved" color scheme to them. Contractor showed up one day (without advance notice) and began to paint the house. Homeowner became aware of painting crew being on site via their security cameras. C Design Review Subcommittee—October 10, 2017 Page 5 of 9 As the contractor completed sections of the house, owner stated the contractor would contact them and asked if they liked the color. Again,the owners stated they were unaware of the staff "approved" color scheme. Commission acknowledged paint color diversity in the historic district is good, if appropriate colors and locations are used. For older historic houses (such as this one), neutral colors are used for the larger portions of the building with brighter colors used only for small accents/detailing. This allows the house details to be the main focus. Currently, when you drive or walk past the house,your eye is drawn to bright paint color in the body (shingles) rather than to the detailing of the house. Commission acknowledged when city funds are used for paint grants, than color schemes must be approved and installed accordingly. Commission feels the contractor should be held accountable for the deviation. Staff has well documented the color selection approved and was presented to the contractor prior to the work being done. This contractor has worked in the historic district before and is aware guidelines must be met for work completed within the historic districts. Contractor has placed the homeowner and the commission in a challenging situation for resolution. Staff has presented the homeowner with an alternative color tones for the blue and purple areas on the house. The muted colors will still be in the respective colors to accentuate the building details. As staff mentioned, homeowner has two options: 1) keep the current paint scheme and opt out of the grant program; or 2) reduce the brightness of the blue and purple paint colors at the body (shingles)with appropriate, staff approved, subdued palate selection. Regarding the piers, the homeowners indicated they used 8" pounded gravel base, then glued the retaining blocks together. Owners were going to install a cap and possibly a light fixture within the piers too. Commission indicated the material of piers usually match the house. Brick piers (not block) with a 2" smooth top, rough edge limestone or cement cap is typical in the historic districts. As seen in staff's examples, piers without fencing are typically shorter, with planter features for adornment. Additionally, a building permit is required for structures greater than 24" from lowest grade. Any structure higher than 24" requires engineer or architect stamped/sealed plans. Homeowner is willing to reduce the height of the pier to ensure it will be less than 24" (including the 2")the required cap. Owners requested keeping four rows of blocks,then one r Design Review Subcommittee—October 10, 2017 • Page 6 of 9 row of brick, topped with the 2" cap. Landscaping to be completed around the piers with pebble stones. Owner was informed stone along a driveway could look like an expansion with inappropriate materials. Owner is willing to work with staff to ensure landscaping type and placement is appropriate. Discussion regarding planter or gargoyle being placed on top of the cap. Commission indicated gargoyles are typically seen on structures looking down (over)the land. A planter would be appropriate at this location. Landscaping (grass, stone, overflowing plants from urn, etc.) would also reduce the amount of exposed block. Motion#1 made by Committee Member Diamond to approve COA as submitted with existing paint color(vibrant blue and purple). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. A roll call vote was requested by Chairman Wiedmeyer. The motion failed unanimously (0-6). Staff explained to the homeowners the appeal process. However, homeowners indicated they would prefer the second option of having the muted tones painted (per staff recommendations). Based on the homeowners willingness to have the muted tones installed,the COA will be completed by staff as an over the counter approval. Motion#2 made by Committee Member Diamond to approve COA as amended staff comments and tonight's discussion with the applicants. The following details are to be approved: 1) block piers with cap is not to exceed 24" containing a minimum of one row of brick from service walk, 2) cap shall be either limestone or concrete and must have a smooth top surface with rough edges, 3) landscape plan new piers to be reviewed and approved by staff. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. 359 Park St—Removal of three existing, non-original windows and replacement with stained glass windows The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to replace three non- original glass windows at the west elevation with stained glass windows. The three windows that are stepped at the west elevation are located at the stairway in the home and were once stained glass originally.The stained glass was removed by a previous owner and replaced with the existing glazing. The homeowners are proposing to re-install new stained glass that borrows designs from the "sister" home in Wheaton, IL. r Design Review Subcommittee—October 10, 2017 • Page 7 of 9 C Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. D. Which are original of steel or aluminum should be repaired with materials to match the original. If repair is not feasible, replacement should be with new windows to match the original as closely as possible in materials and dimensions. Aluminum extruded windows are an acceptable replacement substitute for original steel sash windows, as long as their size, shape and profile match the original windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins.True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the application as submitted, as the proposed changes/repairs to the structure will further enhance its architectural character. Tom and Maureen Lee(owners)were present for tonight's COA discussion. Owners stated that they have been considering replacement of the three windows for a while but have finally C Design Review Subcommittee—October 10, 2017 Page 8 of 9 pushed forward with the project due to some damage to one of the windows during the last storm. The windows found at the Wheaton home are stated to be "original" to their structure and is what they will be copying for the new stained glass windows. Stained glass pieces will be custom made by Mary Krebsbach. Sashes will be removed and reused, stain glass would be inserted and then entire piece would be installed. This is not a window replacement. Motion made by Committee Member Diamond to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: December plaque awards will be held on December 5th at the Elgin History Museum. Social hour at 6:00pm, awards start at 7:00pm. Appeal for St Joseph's Church retaining wall/planter was overturned by the Elgin Heritage Commission with a few notations: 1) side retaining wall was to be removed, 2) church officials must work closely with staff and Design Review Subcommittee regarding the future addition to the church to ensure appropriate materials and designs will be used for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Savel. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 6:56 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Cindy A. Walden Approved: Design Review Subcommittee Secretary October 24, 2017 r Design Review Subcommittee—October 10, 2017 Page 9 of 9 r r r Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, October 24, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. October 10, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business F. New Business 1. 653 Douglas Avenue— Installation of new window; replacement of two windows 2. 431 E Chicago Street— Installation of new rear stairs G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616} PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. rDesign Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission October 24, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter,John Roberson, Dennis Roxworthy, Scott Savel, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Ristow CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve the minutes of October 10, 2017, filik as amended (typos). The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 653 Douglas Ave—Installation of new window; replacement of two windows 431 E Chicago S—Installation of rear stars ITEMS TABLED: None r Design Review Subcommittee—October 24, 2017 Page 2 of 5 NEW BUSINESS: 653 Douglas Ave—Installation of new window; replacement of two windows The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)to create a rear(East) attic window(double-hung)for additional ventilation.The applicant is also proposing to remove and replace two rear in-swing windows with two double-hung aluminum-clad wood windows. The applicant noted that they wanted additional ventilation and lighting in the attic and are proposing to install a window that is proportional in size for an attic window. Existing trim is to remain with the window set into this space. The two in-swing windows are not original to the home as this section of the home used to be another porch.The in-swing windows are proposed to be replaced with two-double-hung aluminum-clad wood windows. The windows are visible from the public way (Lovell Street). Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary,the recommended replacement should be in-kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked-on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap-on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap-on simple grilles. G. screens and/or storms should be wood or baked-on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double-paned Low-E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low-e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Design Review Subcommittee—October 24, 2017 Page 3 of 5 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. That the proposed windows shall be 1/1 double-hung, aluminum-clad wood, and must match in kind to the existing windows. 2. Window glass shall not be tinted. 3. The trim around the attic window shall be retained and details shall match those found on other windows found on the home. It is recommended that the details found at the adjacent windows be replicated to match and installed at the attic window. 4. The proposed two double-hung windows at the in-swing windows shall fit into the existing window opening. ***** John Wiedmeyer(contractor)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Contractor noted the inside the attic the original rafters and remnants of the prior fire damage can be seen. Attic is fairly shallow in height. The sill of the proposed window will be roughly 18" above the attic floor. Due to the limited space, the proposed window will be more of a square, rather than elongated. Trim details of the 2nd floor window will be replicated for the attic window. Commissioners noted the replacement of the casement windows with double hung windows will look more appropriate to the style of the house. (1114. Motion made by Committee Member Diamond to approve with staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed 5-0-1. Abstain: Wiedmeyer. 431 E Chicago S— Installation of rear stars The property owner has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness(COA)to rebuild the rear egress stairs. The rear egress stairs are proposed to be rebuilt. However because of the lower visibility of the structure from the street, the property owner is proposing a simpler design. To note,the stair structure is not visible from the street. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches: A. should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing. B. should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale, and placement. C. should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and r'' the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind Design Review Subcommittee—October 24, 2017 Page 4 of 5 the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. should have steps of the same material as the porch floor(e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick). E. should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house, or with decorative wood framed skirting,vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. should not be removed if original to the dwelling. J. should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Staff Recommendation: Rear Egress Stairs Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness with the following conditions: 1. All porch elements to be primed and painted. 2. All other details shall match the submitted drawings. John Roberson (architect)was present for tonight's COA discussion: The current staircase structure is partly supported by the basement access vestibule. Proposed construction will extend the landing just beyond the vestibule outer wall, which will allow the staircase to be independent of the vestibule. The 6x6 supports proposed are due to the proximity of the staircase and the driveway. From the staff photos, commissioners observed several concerns for the existing staircase: open risers, varied height of stairs, squared treads, open/spacing of railing system, etc. Commission indicated the simple design proposed is appropriate for a rear entrance. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond. The motion passed 5-0-1. Abstain: Roberson. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: Staff acknowledged in the November 2017 edition of Popular Woodworking Magazine, Chairman Wiedmeyer was the winner of"Readers' Choice" winner for his Frank Lloyd Wright inspired light cover. The article stated more than 800 pieces of oak, glass, plywood and veneer was used to make this stunning looking light cover. r J Design Review Subcommittee—October 24, 2017 Page 5 of 5 rik CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Roberson. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Hunter. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, i,e,.7.,t1. 0()4,,,0"6--)---/ Cindy A. Walden Approved: Design Review Subcommittee Secretary November 14, 2017 r C Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee Tuesday, November 14, 2017 6:00 p.m. Elgin City Council Chambers 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120 Agenda A. Call Meeting to Order B. Roll Call C. Approval of Minutes 1. October 24, 2017 D. Recognize Persons Present E. Old Business F. New Business 1. 266 Lessenden Place— Demolition of building 2. 140 N. Porter Street— Reconstruction of front stairs—new handrails 3. 162 Franklin Street— Reconstruction of front and rear porch 4. 408 S Liberty Street— Maintaining concrete block pillars in front of home G. Other H. Tabled Items I. Staff Comments 1. National Trust Conference—November 15-17th i. Elgin Mid-Century Tour—November 16th 2. December 5, 2017 Plaque Awards—Elgin History Museum J. Adjournment THE CITY OF ELGIN IS SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT OF 1990. INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING AND WHO REQUIRED CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO OBSERVE AND/OR PARTICIPATE IN THIS MEETING, OR WHO HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ACCESSIBILITY OF THE MEETING OR THE FACILITIES, ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ADA COORDINATOR AT (847) 931-5620 {TDD (847) 931-5616} PROMPTLY TO ALLOW THE CITY OF ELGIN TO MAKE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR THOSE PERSONS. elik Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission November 14, 2017 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Rebecca Hunter, John Roberson, Dennis Roxworthy, Scott Savel, and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Ristow CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Roberson to approve the minutes of October 24, 2017, as submitted. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Savel. The motion passed unanimously. RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 266 Lessenden Place—Demolition of building 140 N. Porter Street—Reconstruction of front stairs—new handrails 162 Franklin Street—Reconstruction of front and rear porch 408 S Liberty Street—Maintaining concrete block pillars in front of home ITEMS TABLED: None C • Design Review Subcommittee—November 14, 2017 Page 2 of 10 r NEW BUSINESS: 266 Lessenden Place—Demolition of building The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the existing unoccupied residential building located at 266 Lessenden Place. The applicant noted that this property is part of potential future redevelopment plans, combined sewer below-ground wastewater storage structure, for the Fox River Water Reclamation District. Staff completed a site inspection of the structure on October 19, 2017 and determined that the structure is in repairable condition. However, staff did not have access to the interior of the structure at that time. The property is currently vacant (water shut off on April 12, 2017). Fox River Reclamation District purchased the property in May of 2012. The building was built in 1958 (construction began in 1957) and although it is now considered historic,the property is not within the period of significance (1840-1940)for the Elgin National Watch Historic District.The remaining homes on the block are within the period of significance. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Guidelines for Demolition A. Should be avoided of any original feature or part of a pre-1945 building. B. should not occur, unless: 1. An emergency condition exists and the public safety and welfare requires the removal of the building or structure; 2. A building does not contribute to the historical or architectural character of the districts and its removal will improve the appearance of the districts; or 3. The denial of the demolition will result in an Economic Hardship on the applicant as determined by Chapter 20.10 of Title 20 of the Elgin Municipal Code—"Elgin Historic Preservation Ordinance." 4. The denial of the demolition will impede rehabilitation, or redevelopment of the site, and/or adjacent properties from substantially improving the aesthetic, architectural or economic value of the affected properties and surrounding area. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the request to demolish the structure as it meets Standard B2 — building does not contribute to the historic and architectural character of the district and Standard B4—denial of the demolition will impede rehabilitation/redevelopment of the site. However, staff has the following comments and recommendations: 1. Private sidewalk and gravel driveway shall also be removed and restored to grass. 2. Allow the property to be available to neighborhood preservation groups such as the Gifford Park Association (GPA) to salvage architectural elements within the building. • Design Review Subcommittee—November 14, 2017 Page 3 of 10 ***** Bob Trueblood (Representative of Fox Valley Water Reclamation District-FRWRD)was present for tonight's COA discussion: FRWRD's 5-10 year plan is to construct an underground storage tank facility, which will encompass this parcel and several others adjoining parcels. Multi-million dollar project. Discussions with the city has been to allow a small pocket park installed above the storage tank. Pros and cons of a pocket park in this area were discussed by the commissioners. FRWD is awaiting the Illinois EPA application approval; then discussions will continue with the City of Elgin's engineering, water and parks departments with development of the exposed land. House has flooded several times. Liability issue from water intake and building being a vacant building for the past few years. The demolition of this structure has been mentioned in prior DRSC meetings when discussing adjacent parcels. This is the first formal COA request regarding the removal of the structure at this address. Various parcels in the area are part of FRWRD's future plans. A large chicken hatchery/coop was demolished last year on the parcel south of this property. It was structurally unsound, abandon, in disrepair and was frequently found with homeless persons within the structure. The former Elgin Corrugated Box building at Raymond and Bluff City Blvd also had numerous police and fire calls due to persons being illegally within the structure. FRWRD has also divided lots in this area to allow single family dwelling to remain, yet allowing open area needed for the future underground storage tank facility. Demolition of any structure in a historic district are taken quite seriously. This house is over 50 years old, however it is not a contributing structure in the Watch historic district. Commissioners noted that items#2 &4 of the four standards are applicable for the demolition of this structure. FRWRD acknowledged that they will need to bid out demolition of building and fill of the land. The driveway and service walks/sidewalks would also be removed. Entire site would be graded and seeded with grass. FRWRD is also willing to coordinate with city staff salvage efforts of anything inside or outside the building. Staff noted that typically the GPA would have a crew come in on one day to remove any doors, windows, trim, aluminum siding, hardwood floors, etc. that may be beneficial to other restoration projects. Staff and FRWRD will coordinate timeline for salvage. Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve with staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed 5-0-1. (Abstain: Diamond) r Design Review Subcommittee—November 14, 2017 Page 4 of 10 (11164 140 N Porter Street—Reconstruction of front stairs—new handrails The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to reconstruct the property's front porch stairs. The applicant stated that they are going to only reconstruct the stairs at the front porch at this time due to heavy deterioration at the treads and handrails. Staff stated that the new design must meet the Design Guidelines specifications as well as meet building codes. The applicant noted that they will be completing the rest of the work at the porch (guardrails, skirting) at a different time but wanted approval for a preliminary design. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood (I'' floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. I. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. r Design Review Subcommittee—November 14, 2017 Page 5 of 10 Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber. The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. Should have newel posts and balusters, treads and risers, to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: 1. The handrail shall match as closely as possible including size, design, details, etc. to the existing handrails found at the south portion of the front porch.This includes the spindles to be 2x2 square corners with a central bead (to match the existing spindles), placed 2.5" apart.That the bottom rail matches as closely as possible including the size, design, details to the existing bottom rail found at the south portion of the front porch. 2. That the newel posts are installed at the bottom of the stairs and shall be round (fiberglass recommended) with a 5 %" diameter ball cap. 3. That the stair treads shall 5/4" x 12 (recommended) or 2x12 and bull-nosed on 3 sides and overhang the risers a minimum of 1". Pressure treated wood or composite material is acceptable. When using pressure treated wood for the stair treads, paint every side with porch/deck enamel to deter any future cupping of the board. Use 3-4 deck screws (ceramic coated preferable)to adhere board to framing. 4. Skirting at the stairs shall match the existing skirting found at the side porch (diagonal cross hatch). 5. That all other details match the attached rendering and sketches. All porch details shall be primed and painted. ***** David Schneider(owner)was present for tonight's COA discussion: Wrap around porch was added by 1913, per Sanborn map. Adjacent property (sister house) is shown with an attached (not wrapped) porch. Skirting on the side porch is the turned lattice; which is not included in this COA request. However,the wrap around porch is proposed with a "diamond" pattern for skirting and would be appropriate in design. Commissioners explained the "stock" lattice at the home improvement stores could not be used for the "diamond" pattern. Skirting would have to be made using 30 and 60 degree angles. Homeowner prefers the look of the "diamond" pattern and is agreeable to making the "diamond" pattern skirting. Gooseneck rail system is noted as 28" at highest point. Therefore the handrail down the steps rik will need to project about 6-8" from the column than angle down the steps to the newel post. Design Review Subcommittee—November 14, 2017 Page 6 of 10 Since there is no evidence of an original gooseneck handrail at the stairs,the straight hand rail design would be appropriate for the house. Motion made by Committee Member Hunter to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirement: skirting to have diamond pattern. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. 162 Franklin Street—Reconstruction of front and rear porch The property owner has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA)to rebuild the rear egress stairs and front porch guardrails and stairs. The applicant noted that the rear egress stairs were removed for access to the building when installing the fiber cement board siding at the addition. Due to this, the stairs must be brought into compliance.The rear stairs are also being proposed in a simpler design as it is near the rear of the home.The rear stairs are partially visible from the street, though are currently hidden from a lawful non-conforming privacy fence. The front porch recently has had emergency repairs to reattach the front porch roof to the structure. Staff noted to the owner that the full width front porch is not original to the home and was constructed after the 1950s according to the 1950 Sanborn map where the full front porch is not shown. Staff stated to the homeowner that the home likely had a small front porch stoop that led into the home at the door location.The owner stated that they would prefer to retain the existing full front porch roof by conducting the emergency repairs at the roof and installing new guardrails and stairs to make them code compliant.The existing columns will remain. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. Should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing B. Should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale and placement C. Should be screened only if the structural framework for the screen panels is minimal and the open appearance of the porch is maintained. Screen panels should be placed behind the original features such as columns or railings and should not hide decorative details or result in the removal of original porch materials. D. Should have steps of the same material as the porch floor (e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick) E. Should have poured concrete steps if the porch, patio or terrace floor is made of concrete (see section on Porch Steps). r Design Review Subcommittee—November 14, 2017 Page 7 of 10 F. Should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. G. Should have trellises made of wood, if trellises are appropriate. H. Should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. Should not be removed if original to the dwelling J. Should not be enclosed with wood, glass, or other materials which would alter the porch's open appearance. Porch Columns and Railing A. Should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. Should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced C. Should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period.The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Porch Staircases and Steps A. Should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. Should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. Should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber.The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. Should have newel posts and balusters, treads and risers, to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted and with the following conditions: Rear Egress Stairs 1. Due to the partial visibility of the rear egress stairs, the top rail shall abut into the 4x4 newels versus placed on top of with the newels extend higher than the top rail.The newels shall then be capped with a post cap. 2. All other rear porch details shall match the submitted drawing. 3. All rear porch details shall be primed and painted. Front Porch Rehabilitation 1. The base wrap around the columns is removed. 2. All other front porch details shall match the submitted drawing. 3. All porch details shall be primed and painted. ***** Design Review Subcommittee—November 14, 2017 Page 8 of 10 r Dallia & Hector Villicana(owners)were present for tonight's COA discussion: Rear porch newel posts should be wrapped with lx. Without the wrapping, the staircase looks like a deck(similar to new construction houses), which is not an appropriate design within the historic districts. Columns should be installed,then railings connected between the newel posts. To accommodate the hand railing going down the steps,the railing may need to extend out and then down to the next post. Front porch original columns are still in place. The proposed illustration indicates the columns would be wrapped, being 10" wide at their widest point. Commissioners noted the proposed columns would be too large/beefy at 10" and requested staff work with the homeowner and architect on a column design of 6x6 with capitals detailing. Newel posts on both porches are to have square hip caps, as illustrated by staff. One of the photos provided by staff had shown exposure between the front porch roof line and the 2nd floor window. Clear smooth cedar siding needs to be weaved in above the front porch line, with the proper installation of flashing for the roof. Motion made by Committee Member Savel to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) 4x4 posts to be wrapped with 1" boards, and include square hip caps, 2) staff to work with homeowner and architect for final details of front porch column details; a) capitals to be added, b) reduction of width, and c) base wrapping. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. 408 S Liberty Street—Maintaining concrete block pillars in front of home The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) to maintain two concrete block piers (35" tall) installed at the private sidewalk. The COA application has been filed as a corrective action to the following violations: 1. Installation of concrete block piers in front of house. The applicant noted that they did not realize that a permit was needed to install the concrete block piers. Staff reminded the applicant that any work completed on the exterior with the exception of installing plantings needs to be reviewed and approved prior to work beginning. On October 10, 2017,the Design Review Subcommittee approved similar concrete block piers installed in front of 414 S. Liberty Street without a COA with the compromise that the two piers in front of the home shall not exceed a total height of 24" with a 2" limestone or concrete top. C Design Review Subcommittee—November 14, 2017 • Page 9 of 10 Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Retaining walls: A. should be preserved and maintained, if original to the dwelling (or built before 1945). B. should be of poured concrete (not concrete blocks) or in stone designs such as cut stone, random rubble, coursed rubble, or cobblestones. Retaining walls of brick are less appropriate but may be constructed. If constructed of artificial or cultured stone, textures, colors and random designs should replicate natural stone. If located in front yards, the walls should be constructed using up to two courses and an additional cap course, not to exceed twenty inches in height. C. should not be removed or replaced with new materials, if built before 1945. D. should not be built on the fronts of dwellings, if constructed of timbers or railroad ties. Staff Recommendation: Concrete Block Piers Staff cannot recommend approval of the application as submitted, since the material (concrete blocks) does not meet the material requirements of the Elgin Design Guideline Manual for Landmarks and Historic Districts. If the piers are approved as proposed, staff recommends that the Design Review Subcommittee recommend the following: 1. The piers are lowered and shall not exceed a total height of 24". 2. A stone or concrete cap is installed on top of the brick piers. Any landscape features such as statues, or potted plants placed on top of the piers shall not exceed a total height of 36" high from the top of the landscape feature to the ground.The landscape features shall not be fixed to the pier. Lorraina &Jon Amundson(owner)were present for tonight's COA discussion: Homeowners indicated they installed the piers a few years ago. Base of pier is compacted gravel. Cap is slate. Planters had been set on top, however they were pushed off and broken. Staff informed commission and homeowner that structures over 3' in height require stamped or sealed plans for permit approval. Brick/stone piers including the cap cannot exceed 24". Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve with staff recommendations and the following requirements: 1) if existing slate cap is not used, replacement cap must be smooth top with rough edges, 2)the piers shall not exceed a total height of 24". The motion was seconded by Committee Member Diamond. The motion passed unanimously. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: 1. National Trust Conference being held in Chicago November 15-17th Elgin will be featured with a bus and walking tour of mid-century buildings, including: Church of the Brethren (just of 1-90), Spring/Douglas Historic District, City Hall, Appellate Courthouse, the Fox River Design Review Subcommittee—November 14, 2017 elk Page 10 of 10 Riverwalk, Fountain Square, Tower Building, Union National Bank, Elgin History Museum, Elgin State Hospital property(laundry facility) 2. December Plaque Awards—December 5th, Elgin History Museum. Social at 6p, Awards at 7p CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Savel. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roberson. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 7:20 p.m. Respe»• • ly submitt-e, ~` de! rR. Cindy A. n Approved: 12/12/2017 Design R- = Subcommittee Secretary r r Notice of Cancellation of Meeting Elgin Heritage Commission Design Review Subcommittee For the regularly scheduled meeting for November 28, 2017 The regularly scheduled meeting of Tuesday, November 28, 2017, has been canceled due no e'' items being submitted for consideration. k Our next meeting will be our regularly scheduled meeting date of December 12, 2017, at 6:00 p.m., Second Floor, City Council Chambers, North Wing, City Hall, 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, IL 60120. Should you have any questions regarding the posting of this cancellation notice, please contact the staff liaison Christen Sundquist at 847-931-6004. r