Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-22-16 DRSC Approved 12-13-16Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission November 22, 2016 Minutes The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall) by Chairman Wiedmeyer. MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Diamond, Bill Ristow, Dennis Roxworthy and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Rebecca Hunter, John Roberson and Scott Savel CITY STAFF PRESENT: Christen Sundquist, Historic Preservation; and Cindy Walden, DRSC Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve the minutes of November 8, 2016, with one typo (page 3: "was" instead of "were ". The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed 3 -0 -1. Abstain: Diamond RECOGNIZE OTHER PERSONS PRESENT: None PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business None New Business 38 N Gifford St - Removal of window opening at rear elevation of garage ITEMS TABLED: None Design Review Subcommittee — November 22, 2016 Page 2 of 4 NEW BUSINESS: 38 N Gifford St - Removal of window opening at rear elevation of garage The applicant has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to re -side over an existing window opening at the rear (west) elevation of the garage. The applicant noted that when they bought the property the window was not there and the opening was boarded up with plywood. They indicated that they would like to side over the window opening with siding to match the existing (shingle) to make the garage more slightly. To note, the garage has been altered since it was built (c. 1913) and the window is not visible from the public way. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Windows A. Which are original should be preserved in their original location, size, and design and with their original materials and numbers of panes (glass lights). B. Which are not original should not be added to primary facades or to secondary facades where readily visible. C. Should be repaired rather than replaced, but if replacement is necessary, the recommended replacement should be in -kind to match the originals in material and design. Windows clad in aluminum or baked -on aluminum are acceptable as replacement windows for use throughout the structure. Factors to be considered in determining whether the severity of deterioration of windows requires replacement shall include but not be limited to the following factors: damage, excessive weathering, loss of soundness or integrity of the wood, deterioration due to rot or insect attack, and cost to repair. As to the factor of the cost to repair windows, a particular window may be permitted to be replaced rather than repaired if the estimated cost to repair the windows is more than the estimated cost of the purchase and installation of appropriate replacement windows. D. Which are original of steel or aluminum should be repaired with materials to match the original. If repair is not feasible, replacement should be with new windows to match the original as closely as possible in materials and dimensions. Aluminum extruded windows are an acceptable replacement substitute for original steel sash windows, as long as their size, shape and profile match the original windows. E. Vinyl extruded windows are not permitted for use in historic districts. F. Which are new should not have snap -on or flush muntins. True divided muntins are preferred over these types of muntins which do not have the same appearance as historic windows. New muntins which are an integral part of the window sash and installed on both sides of the glass are preferable to snap -on simple grilles. G. screens and /or storms should be wood or baked -on or anodized aluminum and fit within the window frames. Design Review Subcommittee — November 22, 2016 Page 3 of 4 H. that are approved for replacement may be fitted with new double -paned Low -E glass that will improve the energy conservation on the interior. Only low -e glass that does not contain a tint should be used. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the application as submitted, with the following recommendations: 1. The framing of the window opening shall remain to allow for possible, future restoration of the structure. 2. The new siding must match the existing and not be noticeable. 3. All elements shall be primed and painted and be of a consistent color. Juan Rajas (owner) and his brother Tomas Rajas were present for tonight's COA discussion: Property was purchased in 2010. In order to see the back side of the garage, you have to be in the neighbor's yard. Was unaware of the condition of back of the garage until a code case recently issued. Commissioners stated the homeowner needs to be sure to use the siding/wall shingles (square edges, and tightly butted together), not roofing shingles. Attendees assured the commission the correct wall style shingles will be purchased installed. They also indicated the remained of the garage wall (which previously was converted to living space) would only require painting of the existing wall shingles. Both portions will be painted white to match the existing wall color. Motion made by Committee Member Roxworthy to approve with staff recommendations. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Ristow. The motion passed unanimously. ADDITIONAL STAFF COMMENTS: 1) December 6th is the Plaque Award ceremony at the Elgin Historic Museum. Doors open at 6:OOpm, ceremony starts at 7:OOpm. All commissioners and the public are invited. 2) The Elgin Heritage Commission will be receiving a "state" award for their website. The Illinois Association of Historic Preservation Commission will present the award on December 10, 2016, in Joliet, IL at 10:OOam at Joliet Area Historical Museum. CORRESPONDENCE: None Design Review Subcommittee — November 22, 2016 Page 4 of 4 ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Committee Member Diamond. The motion was seconded by Committee Member Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 6:13 p.m. Respectfully submitted, /y ✓ 1 i A /1 I Cindy A. Walde Approv d: Design Review committee Secretary / / /�