Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010 Design Review Subcommitee (3) Minutes Design Review Subcommittee of the Elgin Heritage Commission April 13, 2010 The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was called to order at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers (Located on the 2nd floor of City Hall)by Chairman Stroud. MEMBERS PRESENT: Betsy Couture, Paul Durrenberger(6:35), Pat Miller, Dennis Roxworthy, Steve Stroud and John Wiedmeyer MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Briska CITY STAFF PRESENT: Jennifer Fritz-Williams, Historic Preservation Specialist; and Cindy Walden, DRS Secretary rilk PROPERTIES ON AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION: Old Business 8 Walker P1—Repoint foundation and replace window wells New Business 378 Raymond Street—replace handrails and stairs on rear deck 467 Division Street—Install fence 255 Bartlett Place—Install handrails and newel post on front porch 558 E Chicago Street—Repair garage, replace two windows 552 N Spring Street—Replace garage door OTHERS PRESENT: Holly Wiedmeyer APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Commissioner Roxworthy to approve the minutes of March 23, 2010, as submitted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Miller. The motion passed unanimously. ""' ITEMS TABLED: None Design Review Subcommittee—April 13, 2010 Page 2 of 9 41, OLD BUSINESS: Motion made by Commissioner Durrenberger to un-table item D1 for discussion (representatives for the properties in attendance for tonight's meeting). This item was heard after all new business items. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. 8 Walker P1—Repoint foundation and replace window wells THIS ITEM WAS TABLED AT THE MARCH 23RD MEETING DUE TO LACK OF OWNER REPRESENTATION. The owner has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to repair and re- point the foundation of the house. Currently, the foundation is covered with concrete blocks. The stone has never been maintained properly,but it hasn't been parged either. The owner would also like to replace the window wells around the basement windows. The guidelines do not specify a specific design or material for this application. Staff has pulled several examples from the internet to show the variety of styles and materials available. The window wells could also be replaced with masonry, but this option does not hold back any water from seeping into the window well. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Foundations A. should be cleaned, repaired, or repointed according to masonry guidelines B. should be parged or stuccoed if the brick and/or mortar is mismatched or inappropriately repaired. C. should not be concealed with concrete block,plywood panels, corrugated metal, or other non-original materials. D. should not be altered and original designs should be retained. If removal of sections of the foundation is required, such as for mechanical unit installation, removal should occur at the rear facade or non-readily visible side facades Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness with the following condition: The Design Review Subcommittee specifies an appropriate material. ***** Javier Cordero(owner): Requested staff to speak on his behalf He was unable to attend tonight's meeting. Durrenberger: The front windows are incorrect style. I was on the committee who previously reviewed the item. Fritz-Williams: The window permit was taken in. Durrenberger: Has the inspection for the permit been completed yet? Is the permit closed? Fritz-Williams: Staff will check the status of the permit. Will confirm if the permit has been inspected, and whether it was approved or denied. Front porch has been denied for this project. Window well: Fritz-Williams: Hard to find small window wells, even online. Couple of window well examples given. Owner does not want brick. Design Review Subcommittee— April 13, 2010 Page 2 of 9 OLD BUSINESS: Motion made by Commissioner Durrenberger to un-table item D1 for discussion (representatives for the properties in attendance for tonight's meeting). This item was heard after all new business items. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. 8 Walker P1—Repoint foundation and replace window wells THIS ITEM WAS TABLED AT THE MARCH 23RD MEETING DUE TO LACK OF OWNER REPRESENTATION. The owner has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to repair and re- point the foundation of the house. Currently, the foundation is covered with concrete blocks. The stone has never been maintained properly,but it hasn't been parged either. The owner would also like to replace the window wells around the basement windows. The guidelines do not specify a specific design or material for this application. Staff has pulled several examples from the internet to show the variety of styles and materials available. The window wells could also be replaced with masonry,but this option does not hold back any water from seeping into the window well. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: '" Foundations A. should be cleaned, repaired, or repointed according to masonry guidelines B. should be parged or stuccoed if the brick and/or mortar is mismatched or inappropriately repaired. C. should not be concealed with concrete block,plywood panels, corrugated metal, or other non-original materials. D. should not be altered and original designs should be retained. If removal of sections of the foundation is required, such as for mechanical unit installation, removal should occur at the rear facade or non-readily visible side facades Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness with the following condition: The Design Review Subcommittee specifies an appropriate material. **** Javier Cordero(owner): Requested staff to speak on his behalf. He was unable to attend tonight's meeting. Durrenberger: The front windows are incorrect style. I was on the committee who previously reviewed the item. Fritz-Williams: The window permit was taken in. Durrenberger: Has the inspection for the permit been completed yet? Is the permit closed? Fritz-Williams: Staff will check the status of the permit. Will confirm if the permit has been inspected, and whether it was approved or denied. Front porch has been denied for this project. Window well: ruk Fritz-Williams: Hard to find small window wells, even online. Couple of window well examples given. Owner does not want brick. Design Review Subcommittee—April 13, 2010 Page 3 of 9 Wiedmeyer: Will they be willing to install brick or concrete? Stroud: Needs to above grade a few inches to assist with keeping water out. Wiedmeyer: Four to six inches above grade of poured cement. No cement on the bottom, only rocks. Rocks are needed so the water does and pool, and also allow the water to soak back into the ground. Mortar: Miller: Can we specify soft mortar,because the hard mortar will crack out. Roxworthy: No parging. Stroud: Clean the stones properly. Miller: Should be a simple as possible; should follow the stones. Motion #1 was made by Commissioner Roxworthy to approve the window wells with concrete sides with gravel base. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Weidemeyer. The motion passed unanimously. Motion #2 was made by Commissioner Roxworthy to approve the re-point the foundation with soft mortar, following the masonry guidelines. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Miller. The motion passed unanimously. NEW BUSINESS: 378 Raymond Street— replace handrails and stairs on rear deck The owner has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the stairs and handrails on the rear deck. There is no change to the size, decking, or skirting. This deck is not visible from the front and almost concealed from the side. The owner wants to follow the recommendations of the guidelines with a top and bottom rail parallel to the decking with 2x2 spindles. The owner did not specify how he wanted the newel posts or new stairs. Staff has provided the standard drawing with a few modifications (Exhibit Gl). Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Decks A. should be located at the rear of dwellings only, where they are not readily visible from the street. B. should be stained with an opaque stain or painted to blend with the colors of the dwelling. C. should be kept simple in design. Wood decks are recommended to have traditional style wood balusters complimentary to the design of the building. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted. Jeff Small(owner): Was present for discussion and vote of this COA request. Design Review Subcommittee—April 13, 2010 Page 4 of 9 Miller: Skirting on photo is broken. Does it need to be repaired or replace? Stroud: Skirting should be repaired. Miller: It should be replaced. Should be done appropriately; including the framework. Fritz-Williams: Should the rails be ran into the vinyl siding or end with a post? Wiedmeyer: You don't want to put holes into the siding. Will there be newel posts? Fritz-Williams: Yes, exhibit G-1 shows the detailing. Motion made by Commissioner Wiedmeyer to approve as amended by exhibit G-1; including the repair to the lattice(but not the replacement of). The motion was seconded by Commissioner Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. 467 Division Street—Install fence The owner has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a fence along the edge of the property line. There will be two heights of fence. The fence along division and walker place will be 42" tall, 50%open,wood picket fence. This conforms to the guidelines and staff has already approved this portion of the fence. The"L" shaped section of the fence on the interior lot lines would be 6' tall, solid, wood dog-eared fence. This fence would extend all the way from the front corner of the house, south to the back property line and then east to the edge of the house. There will be a gate at the corner of the house across the driveway. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Fences in Rear Yards A. built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. B. built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. C. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard D. of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. E. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the historic districts. Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted. Miller: Short fence a pre-fab? Habitat for Humanity (owner) Ryan Yarzak (representative): Yes. Miller: Prefab is not usually constructed at 50%open. Not appropriate to have the 6' privacy fence. Guidelines state allowable in rear yard only. You could consider other stopping points that would not extend to the front face of the each elevation. Stroud: Previously, the guidelines would have allowed the 6' privacy to the mid-point of the house. Weidmeyer: What fence height across the driveway? Design Review Subcommittee—April 13, 2010 Page 4 of 9 Miller: Skirting on photo is broken. Does it need to be repaired or replace? Stroud: Skirting should be repaired. Miller: It should be replaced. Should be done appropriately; including the framework. Fritz-Williams: Should the rails be ran into the vinyl siding or end with a post? Wiedmeyer: You don't want to put holes into the siding. Will there be newel posts? Fritz-Williams: Yes, exhibit G-1 shows the detailing. Motion made by Commissioner Wiedmeyer to approve as amended by exhibit G-1; including the repair to the lattice (but not the replacement of). The motion was seconded by Commissioner Roxworthy. The motion passed unanimously. 467 Division Street—Install fence The owner has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a fence along the edge of the property line. There will be two heights of fence. The fence along division and walker place will be 42"tall, 50% open, wood picket fence. This conforms to the guidelines and staff has already approved this portion of the fence. The "L" shaped section of the fence on the interior lot lines would be 6' tall, solid, wood dog-eared fence. This fence would extend all the way from the front corner of the house, south to the back property line and then east to the edge of the house. There will be a gate at the corner of the house across the driveway. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Fences in Rear Yards A. built for privacy should not extend beyond the rear yard beginning at the back corner of the house. B. built for privacy should have a minimum of gate post, corner post, and end posts which are five to ten inches wide and taller than the pickets. C. Can be constructed in the same low fence design found in the front yard D. of wood boards or planks for privacy should be located in rear yards and be no taller than six feet. Boards should be no more than six inches wide. E. Privacy fences of flat boards with flat tops in a single row are most appropriate for the historic districts. Vertical boards topped with lattice or picket are also appropriate as privacy fences. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted. ***** Miller: Short fence a pre-fab? Habitat for Humanity (owner) Ryan Yarzak (representative): Yes. Miller: Prefab is not usually constructed at 50% open. Not appropriate to have the 6' privacy fence. Guidelines state allowable in rear yard only. You could consider other stopping points that would not extend to the front face of the each elevation. rob. Stroud: Previously, the guidelines would have allowed the 6' privacy to the mid-point of the house. Weidmeyer: What fence height across the driveway? Design Review Subcommittee—April 13, 2010 Page 5 of 9 Yarzak: Shorter height of 42",being 50% open. A single gate is proposed. Eilyn Tomassini (homeowner to be): Fence to be high enough to keep my young child within an enclosed area. Weidmeyer: Will the fence height"jump" from 42" to 6'? Yarzak: No; prefer to graduate from the shorter height up to the 6'. Roxworthy: Northing will grow between the fence and the house. Couture: Perfer to have the same height all the way around for the entire fence. Plantings could be done to give privacy. Stroud: Style should be continued too, although the height could change. Miller: To make the same style fence; the 6' fence would need to have exposed posts and caps. Willing to okay the 6' fence along the eastern portion. However, the two styles of fence do not match at all (6' dog ear privacy style—vs- the 42" picket fence). Yarzak: The example shown is a 42"picket—vs- the 6' privacy. Roxworthy: There will be problem with the fence being so high on the west elevation. There is a drop-off/retaining wall behind. Fritz-Williams: The air conditioning unit is on the west elevation. Stroud: Fence will make little difference. Solid without pickets is"suburban" looking. Wiedmeyer: Suggest the style be changed to picket. Fritz-Williams: Would the 5' solid with lattice top be an option? Stroud: No, too new of a style. The 6' picket with spacing will give coverage too. Barberry, morning glories, etc for privacy. Wiedmeyer: Spacing on the 6' fence? Can they be slightly spaced? Fritz-Williams: Yes. Miller: Concerned about the spacing of the boards. Couture: Picket boards can be purchased at the local lumber store. Miller: Stopping points need to be concluded too. Stroud: Suggest the stopping point should be where the two fences come together(in a gradual increase) at the gable on the west. The 42" fence to be approximately 13.06 linear feet; and gradually increase to 6' of approximately 12.20 linear feet. Miller: What style picket for the 6' portion of the fence? Stroud: Must match the 42"picket fence. Wiedmeyer: Need to "plum"the fence too, due to elevation changes. Motion made by Commissioner Weidmeyer to approve as amended: 1) 42" fence as submitted; 2) 42"to 6' to north gable(appx 13'); 3) 42" to 6' east (appx 12'); 4)pickets to match. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Roxworthy. The motion passed 4-2. Yeas: Couture, Durrenberger, Stroud and Wiedmeyer Nays: Miller and Roxworthy Design Review Subcommittee—April 13, 2010 Page 6 of 9 255 Bartlett Place—Install handrails and newel post on front porch " The owner has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the front porch. The work was started and completed without a permit or an approved COA. The owner has submitted the attached drawing as the plan he followed. However, the constructed porch does not follow the drawing. There is no skirting on the porch. The risers and treads are not the correct dimensions or bull-nosed. The top rail and bottom rail are different. The porch decking is parallel to the house. There are newel posts against the house. The columns were also replaced. All of the finish wood is pressure-treated and not painted. Additionally, the drawing is not appropriate for the style of house. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing. B. should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale, and placement. C. should have steps of the same material as the porch floor(e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick). D. should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the façade, if the porch floor is made of wood. E. should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house, or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. Porch Columns and Railings ' A. should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced. C. should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period. The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Porch Staircases and Steps A. should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber. The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. should have newel posts and balusters,treads and risers,to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff does not recommend approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted. Michael Doherty (co-owner): Received the drawings from staff several years ago. Wiedmeyer: Has any other elements been approve? Design Review Subcommittee—April 13, 2010 Page 6 of 9 255 Bartlett Place—Install handrails and newel post on front porch The owner has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the front porch. The work was started and completed without a permit or an approved COA. The owner has submitted the attached drawing as the plan he followed. However,the constructed porch does not follow the drawing. There is no skirting on the porch. The risers and treads are not the correct dimensions or bull-nosed. The top rail and bottom rail are different. The porch decking is parallel to the house. There are newel posts against the house. The columns were also replaced. All of the finish wood is pressure-treated and not painted. Additionally, the drawing is not appropriate for the style of house. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Porches A. should be maintained in their original design with original materials and detailing. B. should be repaired or replaced to match the original in design, materials, scale, and placement. C. should have steps of the same material as the porch floor(e.g. porches with wood floors should also have steps made of wood, not concrete or brick). D. should have wood tongue and groove flooring running perpendicular to the facade, if the porch floor is made of wood. E. should be filled in as traditional for the type and style of the house, or with decorative wood framed skirting, vertical slats, or lattice panels, if open areas in the foundation exist. Porch Columns and Railings A. should be preserved and maintained. Where repair is required, use materials to match the original in dimensions and detailing. B. should be rebuilt in historic designs if the original columns and railings have been removed or replaced. C. should have new balusters for the railing, if required. Porch balusters (also called spindles) should be appropriate for the building's style and period. The height of the railing should be in line with the window sill level, if present, and no greater than 30 inches in height. Porch Staircases and Steps A. should be retained in their original location and configuration, if original to the property. Wood and concrete steps should be repaired with materials to match the original. B. should be replaced with wood rather than brick or concrete, if the porch floor is made of wood. C. should have their tread constructed in either 5/4x12 or 2x12 lumber. The ends of the treads should be bull-nosed and overhang the riser by no less than 1 inch. D. should have newel posts and balusters, treads and risers, to match original porch construction. Staff Recommendation: Staff does not recommend approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted. Michael Doherty (co-owner): Received the drawings from staff several years ago. Wiedmeyer: Has any other elements been approve? Design Review Subcommittee—April 13, 2010 Page 7 of 9 rik M. Doherty: Received a COA for temporary treads and riser(for a second access point) Greg Doherty (co-owner): Steps are correct size and bullnosed. Rails were changed. Stroud: The decking needs to be perpendictual to the building. G.Doherty: Framing was approved by the city inspector during the temporary porch. Stroud: It's too modern of a design for this home. Miller: Posts are very close to exhibit G; railings are considered hollow railings. Roxworthy: As built, it is a deck design, not a porch design. Stroud: Work was done with a COA and/or permit. If the design had been submitted for consideration prior to construction, the COA would not have been approved. M.Doherty: Due to time restraints, we built the current porch. Miller: Top rail is different than exhibit G. M.Doherty: This is a rental property. The rails will be torn off within a few months. G.Doherty: Skirting has not been completed yet. M.Doherty: There are many cats in the area that want to have a porch for their home. We will not be installing the 1"board skirting. Would consider the rails,post, and wrapping of the posts. Miller: Could consider approval for the newel, posts,risers and steps. The railing is inappropriate. Roxworthy: Flooring/deck? Will it be changed to perpendicular? M.Doherty: No, will remain as built. Durrenberger: Very concerned about the decking; should be changed to perpendicular. Stroud: At this time the committee can take a vote; or you can amend your COA request. Should a vote be taken, and the COA is denied; you will have an option to appeal the decision of this committee. M.Doherty: No changes to our COA. Request Motion made by Commissioner Roxworthy to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Durrenberger. The motion failed unanimously. Fritz-Williams explained the appeal process to the applicants. 558 E Chicago Street—Repair garage, replace two windows The contractor has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to repair the existing garage. The structure was been compromised by removal of interior walls and a poor foundation. The contractor proposes to structurally stabilize the garage, raise the garage so a new foundation can be poured, reset the garage and then re-frame the missing walls. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Garages A. should be preserved and maintained. Original features should be repaired to match the original. B. should not be moved or relocated to another part of the lot, if original to the property. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted. ***** Design Review Subcommittee—April 13, 2010 Page 8 of 9 Fritz-Williams: Replacing the screens, repairing windows on the gable end of the 3rd floor, were approved by staff. Julio Valentine (contractor): The interior has had a wall removed towards the rear of the home. Fritz-Williams: Similar to what occurred at 706 Douglas and 203 N Spring. Wiedmeyer: Any exterior work? Siding, trim, etc? Valentine: The building will be raised one side at a time. The window will be taken out prior to raising building. The foundation will be filled in. Motion made by Commissioner Roxworthy to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Wiedmeyer. The motion passed unanimously. 552 N Spring Street—Replace garage door The contractor has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the garage door. This work was done without an approved COA. The old door was wood, no glass, but did have recessed panels. The new door is steel, with recessed panels and no glass. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Garage Doors A. should be maintained to the greatest extent possible,but may be retrofitted with modern hardware and custom garage door openers. If the original doors are missing or too deteriorated to repair,they should be replaced with new doors that fit the original opening and are appropriate to the design and period of construction of the garage. B. should be raised panel designs, with a solid core, if proposed to be in metal designs. Flush design doors (without raised panels)unless retrofitted to look like traditional doors and hollow core metal doors should be avoided when possible. C. should have windows simple in design with clear glass, if windows are necessary. Muntins in a simple design may also be used. The use of ornamental stained glass and openings in decorative shapes such as sunbursts and oval designs are not permitted. D. should have painted metal panel doors to match the house in a color appropriate to the period of the house. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted. ***** Couture: Was there two garage doors? Roxworthy: I also thought there were two doors. Stroud: Yes, there are two sets of sliding doors. Nancy Miller (owner): Door was too heavy to lift. Contractor stated he had submitted and received the permit. Fritz-Williams: Permits pulled for interior work only(plumbing, framing, etc). Wiedmeyer: Today it looks like plywood was installed; definitely the wrong material. Stroud: Appropriate to have trim. Need 1"x6" around with simple cap; similar to cap over the 411) garage window. Design Review Subcommittee—April 13, 2010 Page 8 of 9 Fritz-Williams: Replacing the screens, repairing windows on the gable end of the 3rd floor, were approved by staff. Julio Valentine (contractor): The interior has had a wall removed towards the rear of the home. Fritz-Williams: Similar to what occurred at 706 Douglas and 203 N Spring. Wiedmeyer: Any exterior work? Siding, trim, etc? Valentine: The building will be raised one side at a time. The window will be taken out prior to raising building. The foundation will be filled in. Motion made by Commissioner Roxworthy to approve as submitted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Wiedmeyer. The motion passed unanimously. 552 N Spring Street—Replace garage door The contractor has submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to replace the garage door. This work was done without an approved COA. The old door was wood, no glass, but did have recessed panels. The new door is steel, with recessed panels and no glass. Elgin Design Guideline Manual Specifications: Garage Doors A. should be maintained to the greatest extent possible, but may be retrofitted with modern hardware and custom garage door openers. If the original doors are missing or too deteriorated to repair, they should be replaced with new doors that fit the original opening and are appropriate to the design and period of construction of the garage. B. should be raised panel designs, with a solid core, if proposed to be in metal designs. Flush design doors (without raised panels) unless retrofitted to look like traditional doors and hollow core metal doors should be avoided when possible. C. should have windows simple in design with clear glass, if windows are necessary. Muntins in a simple design may also be used. The use of ornamental stained glass and openings in decorative shapes such as sunbursts and oval designs are not permitted. D. should have painted metal panel doors to match the house in a color appropriate to the period of the house. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness as submitted. -k**** Couture: Was there two garage doors? Roxworthy: I also thought there were two doors. Stroud: Yes, there are two sets of sliding doors. Nancy Miller (owner): Door was too heavy to lift. Contractor stated he had submitted and received the permit. Fritz-Williams: Permits pulled for interior work only(plumbing, framing, etc). Wiedmeyer: Today it looks like plywood was installed; definitely the wrong material. Stroud: Appropriate to have trim. Need 1"x6" around with simple cap; similar to cap over the garage window. Design Review Subcommittee—April 13, 2010 Page 9 of 9 Wiedmeyer: Need smooth, clear, cedar for trim. N.Miller: Will also request COA for scrape and painting. Fritz-Williams: That can be approved by staff over the counter. Motion made by Commissioner Roxworthy to approve as amended: trim to be 1"x6" with cap above to match garage window. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Couture. The motion passed unanimously. CORRESPONDENCE: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion to adjourn was made by Commissioner Couture. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Wiedmeyer. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting of the Design Review Subcommittee was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. Respectfully submittedf Cindy A. alden Approved: Design eview Subcommittee Secretary (3';a _a p 16