HomeMy WebLinkAboutMay Minutes
Meeting
Minutes
Monday,
May
8,
2017
7:00pm
City
Hall
South
Wing,
Second
Floor
Conference
Room
A. Call
to
Order:
7:02pm
B. Roll
Call:
Commissioners
Hulin,
Rehberg,
Miceli,
Erlandson,
Fox,
and
Thomas
present.
Chairman
Vassallo
present.
Staff
Harris
and
Wilhelmi
present.
Student
Representative
Kaye
present.
C. Citizen’s
Forum:
None
present.
D. Staff
Report:
a. Financial
Report:
Individual
Grant
was
dispersed
as
per
the
last
meeting.
Marketing
funds
were
also
spent
from
Facebook.
b. Art
Showcase:
The
build-‐out
is
currently
being
planned
with
Hemmens
staff
and
Staff
Harris.
It
is
planned
for
August
of
this
year.
A
memo
with
all
details
will
be
put
together
and
distributed
to
City
Council
before
anything
moves
forward.
c. Hemmens:
i. Lots
of
dance
school
things
coming
up.
ii. May,
June,
and
July
are
booked
full.
iii. Auditions
for
Summer
Theatre
are
next
week
and
there
are
currently
38
appointments
booked
for
that.
iv. August
is
mostly
dark
for
House
Light
replacement.
d. Approval
of
April
Minutes:
i. Motion
to
approve
minutes
by
Commissioner
Miceli.
Seconded
by
Commissioner
Erlandson.
Approved
by
a
vote
of
5-‐0-‐2.
E. Old
Business
a. Marketing
Sub-‐Committee:
i. Daily
Herald
Marketing
plan:
Still
in
the
works.
ii. CAC
Sponsored
assignments
for
BRAVO,
June:
focus
on
ESFF
and
upcoming
Org
Grant
events.
b. 2016/2017
CAC
Projects:
i. Elgin
Fringe
Festival:
1. Artist
contracts
are
out.
Over
60
artists
have
been
accepted.
Scheduling
is
starting
to
occur
but
will
really
kick
off
after
the
artists
have
accepted
their
spots.
2. Dave
Metzger
is
finishing
the
poster
and
they
will
be
kicking
off
the
poster
and
buttons
at
the
World
Fringe
Day
on
July
11th
3. Family
Fringe
may
be
the
weekend
before
the
festival
in
order
to
get
more
time
and
attention,
as
well
as
to
add
promotion
for
the
festival
itself.
ii. Elgin
Short
Film
Festival:
1. The
call
is
currently
live
and
films
are
currently
being
accepted.
2. Most
of
the
sponsorship
folks
are
back
on
board.
3. The
selection
committee
is
still
accepting
folks
to
view
the
films.
iii. Jazzin’
on
the
8th:
1. Curated
by
Commissioner
Thomas,
focusing
not
just
specifically
on
jazz.
2. One
night
event
to
help
kick
off
Art
and
Soul
on
Friday,
August
4,
2017.
c. Public
Art
Plan:
i. Call
for
Art:
11
applications
submitted.
1. Criteria
for
voting
on
the
submissions,
which
will
happen
at
the
June
meeting:
a. Artistic
Excellence:
Subjective
response
to
the
proposed
artwork.
(1-‐5)
i. What
is
unique
about
the
proposed
artwork?
What
is
timely
about
the
proposed
artwork?
How
does
this
project
highlight
artistic
quality
and
its
intended
aesthetic
of
cultural
impact
on
its
audience?
How
is
the
proposed
artwork
forward
thinking?
What
risks
will
the
artist
take
with
the
proposed
artwork?
b. Technical
Competence:
The
history
of
the
artist’s
artwork.
(1-‐5)
i. Does
the
artist
have
the
level
of
skill
in
order
to
accomplish
their
proposed
artwork?
Are
the
budget
and
timeline
feasible?
Does
the
artist’s
past
work
provide
evidence
to
support
their
level
of
experience
to
complete
the
proposed
artwork?
Does
the
list
of
materials
reflect
the
level
of
research
needed
for
the
proposed
artwork?
c. Narrative
Support:
The
narrative
should
support,
explain,
and
defend
the
work.
(1-‐5)
i. Does
the
proposed
artwork
narrative
provide
evidence
of
sound
management
and
planning
and
a
realistic
timeline?
What
problems,
difficulties,
or
challenges
is
the
artist
likely
to
encounter,
and
does
the
narrative
address
them?
Does
the
narrative
fully
describe
the
history,
thought
process,
and
inspiration
behind
the
proposed
artwork?
Does
the
narrative
describe
the
materials
to
be
used
and
the
expenditures
that
will
be
covered
by
the
budget?
d. Appropriate
Relationship
to
the
Function
of
the
Site:
The
proposed
artwork
should
enhance
the
location
and
accomplish
the
goal
of
placemaking.
(1-‐5)
i. How
does
the
proposed
artwork
engage
the
community
surrounding
the
location?
Does
the
artwork
work
towards
accomplishing
the
goal
of
placemaking?
Does
the
proposed
artwork
offer
encouragement
or
support
for
the
community
surrounding
the
site?
Does
the
proposed
artwork
fit
the
location’s
identity?
e. Long-‐term
Feasibility:
The
proposed
artwork
should
include
a
fully
thought
out
plan
for
the
sustainability,
maintenance,
and
lifetime
of
the
plan.
(1-‐5)
i. Does
the
proposed
artwork’s
narrative
provide
a
plan
for
it’s
care
and
maintenance
for
the
lifetime
of
its
installation
time?
Is
the
maintenance
and
feasibility
of
the
plan
something
that
the
city
of
Elgin
can
maintain,
or
is
there
a
specialized
need?
f. Conceptual
Compatibility:
How
the
proposed
artwork
fits
with
the
theme.
(1-‐5)
(This
is
to
be
used
only
in
Themed
RFPs.)
i. Does
the
proposed
artwork
fit
the
theme
as
expressed
by
the
RFP?
Does
the
narrative
support
the
theme?
How
does
the
proposed
artwork
work
within
the
theme?
ii. General
update:
1. The
plan
is
almost
ready
to
present
to
City
Council
for
adoption
later
this
month.
F. Other
Old
Business:
None
brought
G. New
Business:
None
brought
H. Adjournment:
8:21pm
a. Motion
to
adjourn
by
Commissioner
Rehberg.
Seconded
by
Commissioner
Hulin.
Approved
by
a
vote
of
8-‐0.