HomeMy WebLinkAboutJune Minutes
Meeting
Minutes
Monday,
June
12,
2017
7:00pm
City
Hall
South
Wing,
Second
Floor
Conference
Room
A. Call
to
Order:
7:04pm
B. Roll
Call:
Commissioners
Rehberg,
Erlandson,
Richmond,
Hulin,
Miceli,
and
Thomas
and
Fox
present.
Chairman
Vassallo
present.
Councilwoman
Powell
present.
Student
Representative
Kaye
present.
Staff
Harris
and
Wilhelmi
present.
C. Citizen’s
Forum:
D. Staff
Report:
a. Financial
Report:
i. The
ECAC
is
now
officially
a
member
of
the
Illinois
Art
Alliance
and
Americans
for
the
Arts.
Brochures,
books,
and
info
graphics
from
these
organizations
have
been
ordered.
b. Art
Showcase:
i. June
and
into
July
is
full
with
renters.
ii. August
will
be
dark
for
some
improvements
to
the
space
iii. 2018
calendar
request
forms
have
gone
out
and
will
be
due
back
at
the
end
of
June.
c. Hemmens:
i. Dance
recitals
are
in
house
right
now
ii. August
will
be
dark
for
improvements.
d. Approval
of
May
Minutes:
i. Motion
to
approve
May
Minutes
by
Commissioner
Hulin.
Seconded
by
Commissioner
Rehberg.
Approved
by
a
vote
of
7-‐0-‐2
with
Commissioner
Richmond
and
COucilwoman
Powell
abstaining.
E. Old
Business
a. Marketing
Sub-‐Committee:
i. Daily
Herald
Marketing
plan:
1. A
total
of
10
Time
Out
ads,
12
Neighbor
ads,
and
several
digital
ads
will
be
apportioned
to
the
CAC
events.
That
full
schedule
will
be
sent
to
folks
this
week.
ii. CAC
Sponsored
assignments
for
BRAVO,
July:
Commissioner
Erlandson
will
write
the
article
about
Summer
Theater.
b. 2016/2017
CAC
Projects:
i. Elgin
Fringe
Festival:
1. July
11th,
World
Fringe
Day,
EFF
will
host
a
poster
and
button
release
party
at
Martini
Room.
2. The
buttons
have
arrived
and
showcase
artist
Dave
Metzger’s
artwork.
ii. Elgin
Short
Film
Festival:
1. A
total
of
11
films
have
been
submitted
so
far.
Celebrity
judges
are
being
selected
now.
iii. Jazzin’
on
the
8th:
1. Commissioner
Thomas
is
working
on
this
now.
iv. Kwannza:
1. Coucilwoman
Powell
is
working
with
Kucha
and
Bobbatoni,
an
African
storytelling
and
drumming
group
to
perform.
2. Early
December
or
late
November
would
be
the
date
of
the
event.
It
would
take
place
at
the
Gail
Borden
Library.
c. Public
Art
Plan:
i. General
update:
1. The
Public
Art
Plan
will
be
presented
to
City
Council
on
Wednesday,
June
14th.
2. Voting
on
the
New
Works
for
2017
will
be
done
tonight,
brought
to
Staff
for
feedback,
and
then
brought
back
to
the
ECAC
for
a
final
vote
in
July.
F. Other
Old
Business:
None
brought
G. New
Business:
None
brought
a. Public
Art
Submission
Scoring:
i. Submission
#1
discussion:
1. Commissioner
Rehberg
noted
that
it
seems
somewhat
general
and
not
incredibly
original
in
that
sculptures
like
these
are
often
seen
around.
2. Chairman
Vassallo
noted
that
he
liked
the
motion
of
it
and
that
the
material
seems
low
maintenance.
3. Commissioner
Erlandson
noted
that
it
seemed
busy
for
the
intended
space,
but
depending
on
the
direction
that
it
would
be
placed,
it
would
be
noticeable.
She
also
noted
that
it
would
be
memorable.
She
also
noted
that
the
design
of
this
is
uplifting
and
seems
to
go
in
theme
that
this
is
the
CAC’s
first
public
art
call.
4. Staff
Wilhelmi
noted
that
the
piece
could
be
very
reflective,
which
would
play
nicely
with
the
lights
above.
He
also
noted
a
concern
that
people
would
attempt
to
climb
it.
ii. Submission
#2
discussion:
1. Commissioner
Fox
noted
that
she
like
it,
but
was
confused
about
the
base
noted
on
the
application.
She
also
wondered
if
the
colors
would
be
too
busy
in
the
location.
She
also
noted
that
this
would
be
memorable
and
create
a
location.
2. Commissioner
Erlandson
noted
that
the
pedestal
gets
in
the
shade
before
the
others,
which
is
disappointing.
iii. Submission
#3
discussion:
1. Commissioner
Thomas
noted
that
the
piece
brought
him
emotion.
2. Commissioner
Erlandson
noted
that
the
view
of
this
work
would
be
noticeable
from
a
distance.
3. Commissioner
Miceli
noted
that
it
seemed
like
it
didn’t
belong.
4. Commissioners
Richmond
and
Fox
noted
that
the
narrative
wasn’t
great
and
didn’t
seem
to
tie
into
Elgin
much.
iv. Submission
#4
discussion:
1. Commissioner
Erlandson
noted
that
not
knowing
the
direction
the
piece
was
supposed
to
sit
was
frustrating.
She
also
noted
that
this
piece
didn’t
take
the
location
into
account
when
being
created.
2. Commissioner
Richmond
noted
that
the
submitted
images
were
not
clear
and
seemed
incomplete.
v. Submission
#5
discussion:
1. Commissioner
Fox
noted
that
his
work
is
interesting
but
isn’t
sure
how
his
work
fits
Elgin.
Commissioner
Erlandson
noted
that
his
proposal
said
he
would
be
open
to
making
the
work
more
Elgin
specific,
but
Commissioner
Rehberg
noted
that
while
that
was
good,
it
also
made
it
seem
incomplete.
2. Commissioner
Erlandson
noted
that
this
work
seemed
to
fit
the
location
and
was
busy
enough
to
create
a
location
with
its
work,
and
seems
a
good
contrast
to
the
building.
3. Commissioner
Fox
noted
that
the
supplies
list
was
comprehensive.
4. Staff
Wilhelmi
noted
that
the
work
may
be
something
that
could
grow
to
include
the
remaining
walls
along
that
side
of
the
building,
creating
a
bigger
scene.
vi. Submission
#6
discussion:
1. Commissioner
Fox
noted
that
the
way
to
acquire
the
materials
was
great.
Commissioner
Richmond
agreed
with
that
as
a
good
way
to
work
with
the
community.
Commissioner
Erlandson
noted
that
there
was
no
clear
process
on
how
to
accomplish
that,
especially
with
the
timeframe
in
mind.
2. Staff
Wilhelmi
noted
that
the
samples
were
great.
vii. Submission
#7
discussion:
1. Chairman
Vassallo
noted
that
this
one
was
difficult
to
see.
2. Commissioner
Erlandson
noted
that
the
artist
samples
indicated
that
there
seemed
to
be
no
history
of
the
artist
doing
anything
of
a
substantial
size.
viii. Submission
#8
discussion:
1. Commissioner
Fox
noted
it
didn’t
seem
clear
why
the
sounds
were
so
different
and
when/how
they
occurred;
what
is
the
main
function?
2. Commissioner
Erlandson
noted
that
the
sounds
being
powered
by
the
rain
was
unclear,
especially
with
the
sound
being
increased
and
decreased
by
the
velocity
of
the
rain.
3. Commissioner
Thomas
noted
that
using
both
art
and
science
is
interesting
and
creative.
ix. Submission
#9
discussion:
1. Commissioner
Erlandson
noted
that
the
piece
has
already
been
created,
and
wondered
if
it
was
appropriate
to
the
location.
x. Submission
#10
discussion:
1. Councilwoman
Powell
noted
that
the
scale
of
the
piece
was
clear.
xi. Submission
#11
discussion:
1. Commissioner
Miceli
wondered
if
it
would
be
appropriate
during
the
full
year.
Others
noted
that
it
felt
cold.
2. Commissioner
Erlandson
wondered
how
far
back
you
have
to
stand
to
see
the
full
image
because
of
the
pixilation.
Would
you
have
to
leave
the
location?
3. Commissioner
Rehberg
noted
that
perhaps
it
makes
too
much
sense
in
the
space.
H. Adjournment:
a. Motion
to
adjourn
by
Councilwoman
Powell.
Seconded
by
Commissioner
Hulin.
Approved
by
a
vote
of
9-‐0.