The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDecember 23, 1985 CC VOLUME L December 23, 1985 937 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS COUNCIL-MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT REGULAR MEETING A regular meeting of the Council of the City of Elgin, Illinois was held on December 23 , 1985 at 8:20 p.m. , in the Council Chambers of City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Verbic. The invocation was given by Reverend George Schiffmayer, and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by Councilman Waters. ROLL CALL Roll call was answered by Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Absent : None. MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 9, 1985 COUNCIL MEETING APPROVED AS PUBLISHED Councilwoman Shales made a motion, seconded by Councilman Andersen to approve the December 9, 1985 Council Minutes as published. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Shales, Van De Voorde and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. Abstained: Councilmen Moylan and Waters. COMMUNICATIONS Gloria-Ann Rovelstad and Trygve A. Rovelstad appeared before the Council on behalf of the Pioneer Memorial Foundation of Illinois. Gloria-Ann Rovelstad: I am pleased to present at this time a check for $569.00 to the City of Elgin on behalf of the Pioneer Memorial Foundation of Illinois, to be used for the renewal and repair of the cement foundation of the Pioneer Monument in Memorial Park, Elgin. Mayor Verbic: Thank you very much for contributing this money to the City of Elgin for the repair of the cement foundation, I accept this on behalf of the City. I am sure that all of the Council members appreciate everything which the foundation has done in providing this beautiful sculpture to the City. AWARDING OF BIDS Mayor Verbic: We will proceed to bids and I am going to ask Mr. Cook to make a statement in regard to the bids. Jim Cook: Mayor and members of the Council, in the hope of expediting, I would report to you that Items 1, 2,5, 6, 7 , 9 and 10 are the low bids and can be approved by a single motion, if you see fit . 938 VOLUME L Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to approve the low bidders for Items 1,2 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 and 10. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. BID AWARDED FOR SNOW & ICE CONTROL SAND Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to award this bid to the low bidder, Elmhurst- Chicago Stone, at a unit price of $4 , 63/ton, or $2 , 315.00 for an estimated quantity of 500 tons. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS & PARKS TRUCKS Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to award this bid to the low bidder, Larry Faul Oldsmobile, for a total amount of $33, 625 . 87 . Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. BID AWARDED FOR CALCIUM CHLORIDE Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to award this bid to the sole bidder, W & W Sales & Leasing, for $4 , 878.40 based upon an estimated quantity of 16,000 gallons. Yeas : Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. BID AWARDED FOR TREE PRUNING Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to award this bid to the low bidder, Fowler Tree Surgery, for a total contracted expected to be in the $3 , 000.00 range for all work completed. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. BID AWARDED FOR LOADER BACKHOE Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to award this bid to the low responsive bidder, Payline West Inc. , for a total amount of $24 , 381.00. Yeas : Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. I i VOLUME L 939 BID AWARDED FOR SECRETARY WORKSTATION Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to award this bid to the low bidder, Midwest Publishers Supply, for a total amount of $3 , 890 .50. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. BID AWARDED FOR RADIO CONVERSION Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to award this bid to the low bidder, Radco Communications Inc. , for a total evaluated cost of $6, 520.00. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. SALE OF DICTAPHONE RECORDER Councilwoman Moylan made a motion, seconded by Councilman Gilliam to accept the proposal from the Village of South Elgin and sell the City's surplus 4000 Recorder unit for the sum of $2, 000.00. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. UPGRADING OF ARMORY AND TACTICAL WEAPONS Mr. Cook advised the Council there is no adverse financial impact as this exchange is on a weapons-for-weapons basis with no cash involved. It is noted, however, we have increased the value of the City' s armory by approximately $3,250.00. Councilman Gilliam made a motion, seconded by Councilman Andersen to accept the proposed weaponry from MD Ordinance of McHenry with a total value of $7, 902 .00. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. BID AWARDED FOR PAINTING OVERHEAD WATER STORAGE TANKS Mr. Cook Advised the paint to be used on this project will be supplied by Tnemec Company at no cost to the City or contractor as partial compensation associated with paint failure of the Riverside Water Treatment Plant . Councilman Van De Voorde made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Moylan to award this contract to the low bidder, Am-Coat Painting Inc. , for a total amount of $55,450.00, less a 1% 20 day prompt payment discount . Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor • Verbic. Nays: None. - - -------- ---- ---- ------------- 940 VOLUME L BID AWARDED FOR GIFFORD PARK LIGHTS This bid was previously awarded to Mielke-Lauderdale Electrical Contracting. Copies of the contract were sent to them on November 13 , 1985 for their execution of same. On December 5, 1985 they advised us they were withdrawing their proposal because they had made an error in computing their labor costs. A bid security in the amount of $986.00 was also submitted with their bid. Said bid security would be forfeited in the event a contract to complete the work is not entered into. Councilman Gilliam made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Moylan to consider Mielke-Lauderdale in default and cash the bid security, awarding the bid to the second low bidder, Lohbauer Electric in the amount of $29, 538.13 . Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. BIDS REJECTED FOR RE-SEALING OF SPRING STREET Councilwoman Shales made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to reject all bids received and re-advertise this project. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING BUDGET FOR 1986 Mr. Cook: We have attached a memorandum which details those items that were reviewed in the Budget for Revenue Sharing, along with several items that were raised in the Budget for possible consideration. We would recommend this year that all of these items be held for consideration. As soon as we get an indication of the amount of actual revenue sharing to be received we will be bringing back a proposed priorization in 1986, quarter by quarter, and we would then take the items as far as the monies that we may receive. We know the revenue sharing will be reduced, we do not know how much, and rather than approve a formal total, we would recommend that we do it on a priority basis, and therefore we will bring that back to you. Mayor Verbic: Is there anyone in the audience that would like to participate in this public hearing. Seeing none, I would call for a motion to close the public hearing. Councilman Andersen made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Shales to close the public hearing. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. -------------- ------- - ----- ----------------------------- ---- ---- - -- - - - VOLUME L 941 PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE CITY OF ELGIN 1986 BUDGET Mr. Cook: The Council, as a Committee of the Whole, has held several hearings on the budget , has received and made a number of changes, all of which are incorporated in the Item under H ( 3 ) . Staff at this point has nothing else to offer in the public hearing. Gunnar Carlson: The purpose of this presentation is to convince the present members of the City Council that the continued imposition of this tax is unfair to the Area 2 property owners and should be abolished, and it should be abolished no matter what your decisions may be on other parking areas. The above is quoted from Judge Ermeritus Ernest Akemann's presentation on this subject in 1984 . It is also appropriate for the following: City of Elgin Special Service Area Number Two Taxing District has been the subject of much discussion since 1977. The Special Service Area was established by City of Elgin Ordinance T10-77 , September 8, 1977, to provide special municipal services to said area in addition to services provided to the City generally. Included in said services shall be the design, construction and operation of a multi-level public parking facility and all things incidental thereto, including acquisition of land and construction of street improvements. This was done after a public hearing on the question, held after due notice etc. , from minutes of the public hearing it is noted that, the following property owners or tenants appeared at the public hearing and objected to the potential tax to be imposed upon properties located in the district. Pete Andersen, Frank Ciacco, Rose Hawkins, Earl Keeney and Paul Warren. The following owners appeared and requested that the proposed special service area be formed as proposed: George Perucco, Harold Seigle and Paul Zumkeller. On Page 2 of the minutes of the public hearing it is noted that Mr. Pete Peterson stated "I don't believe that the maximum rate would ever be lowered, prices are not coming down. " Mr. Nelson replied, we are talking about a special tax for this facility only, you cannot levy this tax for any other purpose. Mr. Petersen stated, but you have to consider mainten- ance costs and part of the maintenance costs are going to have to come out of revenue. I don't think there is any businessman who can predicate the future of his business on this kind of variable. If the professional people in the City of Elgin were to say, well if things work out alright , fine, we will take the higher salary, but if things don't work out we will take the lower salary. I don 't think you would redicate your salary on a variable between $1.10 and $4 .00 and we are having to predicate our income on that same thing. 942 VOLUME L On Page 3 of the same minutes is the following: Harold Siegle Stated, "I feel we need this parking lot , it ' s very important to our city and downtown. I have reservations about this parking lot and I note from the comments you fellows have reservations too. I think that with all the shortcomings concerning the mall that I have talked about that all of us here, property owners and all, feel an inequity in the taxation. I thin people adjacent to the mall should pay a higher rate than people on the perimeter of the mall. In fairness I thin this is the way it should be assessed. In looking over my criticism of the City, I think the need is so great that we should support it , take our chances that the $4 .00 that you start with may go down to $1.50. I think they will produce revenue and let ' s all support this . " This was Mr. Siegle' s words. Section 2C of the Ordinance states that no petitions signed by 51% of electors of the districts establishment were presented in the 30 days period following the hearing nor, 51% of property owners of record included within the proposed special service area objecting to the formation of said special service are or the levy of taxes as proposed. It was necessary to engage in extensive, expensive litigation to refute the above. Easily in fact , on the electors after eliminating 19 of the 40 electors claimed by the city as being residents of the Douglas Hotel. On some highly technical points the court ruled that a number of property owners ' signatures were defective and they could not be clarified or affirmed. About a dozen charitable and religious organization properties were counted as favoring the project although most stated they wanted to be considered neutral. There was one church whose pastor wrote and requested that they not be counted. It should be noted that there was no provision for a vote for or against the project . Everyone was counted as being in favor unless he signed petitions opposing the matter. The religious and charitable groups were also told by the city that they would not be charged. They are not, by law, exempt from assessments for special services. In Section 5. of the ordinance it provides that a tax not to exceed an annual rate of $4 . 00 per $100, 00 of assessed evaluation, as equalled, is authorized to be levied against real and personal property included in this special service area. In Section 6 the ordinance provides that in accordance with the applicable statute the corporate authorities of the City of Elgin shall be the governing Body of the City of Elgin Special Service Area Number Two. VOLUME. L 943 All of this was proposed to help save the downtown Elgin from economic deterioration, et the properties expecting to benefit most from the construction and operation of the parking facility, those in Fountain Square Plaza, were deliberately, at the request of the owners, left out of the taxing district . The parking ramp was constructed and placed in operation after the Circuit and Appellate Courts failed to find the ordinance invalid. The City of Elgin acquired the property of the Elgin Trades Council and demolished its building. To help the Trandes Council relocate, the City arranged a $400, 000 plus industrial revenuebond loan so that the Trades Council could acquire another building near the tollroad, two miles or so from Elgin's Central Business District. This also enabled a statewide teachers union organization, owners of that building, to leave Elgin completely. The process of arranging industrial revenue bonds to help firms or individuals relocate businesses has also been used to aid one of Elgin' s oldest firms to get out of the central part of the City. Such a bond issue in the amount of $1, 850,000 was arranged for the Elgin Lumber & Supply Company, or Seigle' s Home & Building Centers for the construction of a new facility on the northwest edge of Elgin. These arrangements have caused a friend of mine to remark that the City of Elgin reminds him of Zsa Zsa Gabor of whom it is said, she liked to do charity work among the rich. The original concept of the Spring Street Parking ramps contemplated that , in today's business and government jargon, the facility would be a profit center. It would generate income from rent of retail store spaces on the Spring Street side of the structure in addition to user fees for parking operations. These revenues, it was claimed, would, in addition to paying operating costs, take care of interest and the annual $100,000 principal payment on the outstanding bonds. Judge Emeritus Akemann, in an extensive presentation made to the Council a year ago pointed out that the structure as constructed was not that which was proposed in the promotions, no store spaces were provided. Further it was pointed out that other uses and expenses have occurred not in original prospectuses . Last year I called the attention of the Council to the fact that the combined wisdom of the directors of three of Elgin's financial institutions had recently resulted in the construction and opening of 3 additional drive-in braches in outlying areas of Elgin. These of course made it possible fore more and more bank customers to do banking without coming downtown. This would reduce need to use the new parking ramps. 944 VOLUME L Many street parking meters have been hooded and use of the spaces declared free. Meters have been removed in major lots in the near-downtown area encouraging more and more motorists to avoid the Spring Street Parking Deck. Although the establishing ordinance for the parking venture known as Elgin Service Area Number Two specifies that the City officials of Elgin constitute the governing body, I have not been able to find any minutes of meetings of the governing body or specific records of actions of that body relating to Elgin Service Area Number Two. Such questions as authority for no fees when the parking deck is fully occupied on Sundays was not found in the record. In some large cities this would have the appearance of granting favors or rewarding a few or groups for past favors. With the recent turmoil in an area nearby about displaying a religious symbol, the christian cross on a municipal structure, we should hope that no activists would observe that congregations of certain christian churches are receiving special services without charge from the City of Elgin. The levy now proposed for 1985 is nominal and ridiculous. It does not justify the time of all the staffs that must spread it over the properties of service are two or of the gestation involved in eventually making the collection. While it is claimed that the amounts proposed result from studied delibrations it is apparent that the amount is arbitrary. A year ago the Council appeared to agree that the amount of the levy after abatements would be $25, 000 and intimated that future years would hold at that figure. Ordinance T4- 85 comes up with a figure of $26,225 increased to $26 ,490 by an item of 265, 1% loss of collections. The 26,225 just happens to be last year' s agreed amount plus a shade under 5%. Under the trust in taxation statutes any cases where increases over previous year exceed 5% require that public hearings must be held before adoption. The basis ordinance T10-77 has not been amended and still permits the $4 .00 per hundred levy. This could easily be invoked again unless this Elgin Special Service Area Taxing District is abolished by whatever means are appropriate. Property owners may have their assessed valuations reduced by appeals to the Board of Review, but that, with respect to this levy, only changes the allocation between tax paying units within Area Two. Ackemann Bros. Inc. properties assessed valuation have been reduced in recent years and this year the Home Federal Savings & Loan Assn. has just succeeded in pursuading the Kane County Board of Review to reduce its equalized assessed valuation by $141, 332 to a new total of $799, 920. This will make this property' s assessment for Special Service Area Two approximately equal to that of the Illinois Bell Telephone Co. , who equalized assessed valuation is $803,291 for 1985. i VOLUME L 945 It should be noted here again that the Telephone Company can derive absolutely no benefit from the presence of the parking deck. There is no way a subscriber can confront a person at the Telephone Company property at 255 East Chicago Street to transact any business so the deck means nothing to that company. Paying it 's Special Service Area Two Assessment is a pure gift to the City of Elgin. However, the property of Home Deferal Savings and Loan is directly across Spring Street from the parking facility and could be a prime beneficiary. The whole concept and operation of Elgin Special Service Area Two is replete with examples of such anomalies. They illustrate that the real beneficiaries are the owners of automobiles throughout the City have occasions to visit the downtown area. I hereby request that the City Council of Elgin abate the entire levy for City of Elgin Special Service Area Two for 1986 and promptly abolish this special tax assessment district for all time. It is hoped that this can be done without the petty rancor of individuals of the Council that has been apparent in previous considerations of this matter. Judge Ernest Akemann 's view expressed a year ago in his report and mine are identical as follows : I do not believe that in good conscience you should continue the area two taxing district for even one more year. Mayor Verbic: Thank you Mr. Carlson. Are there any additional comments relative to this public hearing. Dan Fox, 890 Douglas Avenue, President of the Northeast Neighborhood Association: First of all let me say that the northeast neighbors take great pride in the City of Elgin, and in our neighborhood. We support community activities and it is with this same spirit that I speak to you tonight . As you are all aware we have some grave concerns about the North End Bridge proposal. Whether the route is the Wing Park to Summit , stage 1 Slade Avenue design, or the current Big Timber to Congdon proposal, we believe that the bridge is an ill conceived, unnecessary 10 million dollar white elephant . The traffic conjestion projected for the City's already built five bridges does not come to be. The public safety is also a significant one. Fortunately, you have addressed and apparently solved this problem by funding a second ambulance for the eastside, that puts two ambulances on each side of the river. Also the new Summit 946 VOLUME L Street fire station gives the City and our neighborhood great emergency protection. If not to meet the traffic needs, or to provide needed public safety, then I ask you why the bridge. Why spend 10 million dollars when you don 't need to. It is my understanding that 3 million dollars offered by the County is earmarked for the bridge project only. If this is true I don't believe you should be pressured to spend 7 million more to get that 3 . I wonder if the citizens of the City are prepared to see their taxes go up $50.00 to $100.00 per year. It is easier to pay for taxes when the money is going to something worthwhile. I supported and worked for the U-46 school referendum, that benefits our children as well as the entire community. Building a bridge which costs so much and benefits so few, if any, I don't believe is a prudent decision. Our neighbors to the north in East Dundee and West Dundee have a population of 6100 and have one bridge. Carpentersville has a population of 23 , 300 and has one bridge. St . Charles, our neighbors to the south have 18, 600 people and two bridges, and Aurora, more similar to ourselves has 82 ,000 and five bridges and the tollroad. Engin' s 60,000 plus population also has five bridges and the rollroad. This bridge seems to serve Dundee and Sleepy Hollow more than it will the majority of people here in Elgin. All of these towns and cities have thriving downtown business districts and none of these bridges go from totally residential areas. This proposed bridge by-passes our downtown and goes through an established, beautiful, well maintained neighborhood. The engineering firm that is about to receive another contract for $350,000, for the Big Timber/Congdon design, stated last February that this bridge was not justifiable. As you know from the questions that I have given you all previously we have presented you with a series of questions and concerns that I hope you will address. There are several possible suggestions that we have in lieu of this bridge that we can share with you at an appropriate time, but what I am asking you tonight at the very least is to table this issue, and put it to the people of Elgin in the form of a referendum. Ask all of the people what they want and what they are willing to pay for it . I appreciate your time and your consideration on this issue. Thank you. VOLUME L 947 Mayor Verbic: Mr. Fox, I would state that we did have two surveys done, I believe in 1977 and 1980, and this question was provided to every citizen in the City of Elgin, and the overall response was 70% positive, 20o negative and 10% undecided. Mr. Fox: No money was ever attributed or attached to those surveys. I would think that if the people were asked if they were going to pay $50.00 to $100.00 per year to pay for this bridge, thats what we want to find out and if that is the case then your decision is correct, but I don 't think you will find that to be true. Mayor Verbic: I do think your figures on taxes may be out of line. The cost to an assessed value home of $70,000 for a $6.6 million dollar bond issue, including interest , would be an increase of about $30.00 per year, which is quite a difference from what you stated. Dr. Robert Shoenthal, 316 Congdon: If you folks really think that we need a north end bridge, I think there may be other ways of utilizing a bridge, such as the bridge across the tollway. For example, at Sherman Hospital we have dates that members of the staff are given a card and in lieu of paying a quarter each time they have to visit the hospital to see a patient . There is no reason why the State cannot be approached, or whoever is responsible, that perhaps this priviledge be given to us and a certain amount of finances be turned over to the State. The cards could be obtained at the time the vehicle stickers are obtained for an additional fee. I don't think that anyone would object to that for using that bridge. I think this is one way that we could utilize an existing bridge that is well maintained. Mayor Verbic: At the time the Kimball Street Bridge was torn down for approximately one year' s time, I met with the tollway officials trying to obtain permission to pay the authority to use the bridge for the Elgin citizens. We were denied and given a flat no because their charter does not allow anything of this nature. We have tried on other occasions to discuss the use of this bridge with them and the same answer was given to us that we were not permitted under any circumstances to use this bridge in exchange for payment to the Tollway Authority. So this has been tried and there is no ability to use the under portion of the tollway or the tollway for the use of our citizens. Dr. Shoenthal: People who I know who have businesses on Davis Road use that bridge three or four times a day, and they have no complaint whatsoever about paying, they would much rather pay that 30� each time they go through that gate 948 VOLUME L than have their taxes increased. Jim Cook: Mayor, I would like to make a couple of comments with regard to comments that Mr. Fox has raised. There are two issues, one that the report which Mr. Fox has reference to was in February. That report was a draft report , unsigned, submitted for review by staff with regard to certain issues, which we looked at . After that report was reviewed, Lochner went back, he altered and presented a third route which showed some of the advantages of the first two and voided some and that was the item which you reviewed at the meeting of March llth, and which after review, Council selected the Congdon route. Primarily, as he pointed out in his March report , in comparison with the Slade, he still as an engineer, recommended to the Council that in terms of overall costs, the Slade choice would be less expensive in his opinion than the Congdon, but because of Expo Park possible traffic and other things, the Council, as I read the minutes at that time, determined that the benefits of the Congdon Avenue were such that they outweighed the extra dollars as opposed to the detriment that would be done by the Slade and that appears to be what was the final decision factors that went into that site selection. The report which Mr. Fox raised was never submitted to the City Council, but after it was reviewed by staff Lochner went back and amended that report, and produced additional information. Raymond Frazier, 312 Congdon: As I read the draft of February and I recognize it was just a draft , some of the negative comments that Lochner made were concerning the noise impact and the adverse effect on property values on Congdon, and that is still going to be a negative, even in the draft that you accepted. The point that I wanted to make, I am concerned about future planning. Mayor Verbic has said that only 1% of Elginites use the tollway bridge and yet 100 yards to the south we are going to spend ten million dollars, or six million dollars to build a bridge, that people right now are now using when asked how many people he thinks are going to use this new bridge, we don 't know. We are going to build a bridge and then find out how many are going to use it . We want to tie into the Expo Park and yet we are going to tie in with a three lane road down Congdon Avenue with a four lane bridge. I am sure that five years from now you are going to come back and say that we are going to have to widen Congdon because the projected traffic is such. Somewhere along the line I read that the projected traffic on Big Timber will be over 30, 000 cars, up from 8,000 to 30, 000. If there are 30,000 cars on Big Timber there will be 30, 000 on Congdon, so that will not remain a three way street . VOLUME L 949 I think you should tell us if you plan on doing that and if you don 't plan on doing that then I think the people should know that you are not looking ahead. At least that is the way it appears to us on Congdon. Jim Cook: Again I would like to say that at the present time, as I said, there are no plans for four-lane there. The first step that would be done at most would be a three- lane. I don 't expect even that in the initial stages. I can take you to a lot of places in the country and show you two-lane roads that fit into a four-lane bridge. I also think that it is entirely likely that at some time in the future that two feet or four feet on either side of that road may have to be added and you may go to a four-lane road. There is sufficient right-of-way to do that , without taking any property, or condemning any property. I don't look for that for quite a long time, I think to say that it is never going to happen is something that no one in their right mind could ever say about any street in this town, but at the present time what is going to happen on Shoe Factory, certain amounts of traffic that would be coming from Shoe Factory would turn south on Dundee, and use Liberty, others would turn north and go north to the tollroad, others would come west . Right now, after two months I certainly do not have the traffic counts to tell you what it is going to be. I can give you some fairly educated projections as to what I think the impact will be and what we are planning for right now, but if we start tonight we are not going to have a bridge there in 3 years and are certainly not going to start planning four lane roads now, until such time as traffic would justify and that is quite a long way down the line in my opinion. I think if they start Expo Park, as anticipated this Spring, is a year to two years away. I think the Council owes itself and owes the community the kind of planning that says you start to the bridge now. I think the bridge quite frankly is too late getting started if you are going to do it on a planning basis to have it ready when it is needed, but no, I don't at this time see a need for a four-lane Congdon Avenue for now and for sometime to come. I don 't want anyone in this room to think that I have said that there won't be four-lanes on Congdon, because I cannot see that far in the future. I do think that the northern part of this city is going to grow, both on the eastside and the westside, and certainly if the community grows, conditions change, you are going to have to look at that . Mayor Verbic asked if there was anyone else who wished to participate in the public hearing. Having no response the Mayor asked for a motion to close the public hearing. Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Andersen to close the public hearing. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays:None. 950 VOLUME L ORDINANCE PASSED ADOPTING THE 1986 BUDGET IN LIEU OF PASSAGE OF AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE Councilman Andersen made a motion, seconded by Councilman Gilliam to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Councilman Waters: When we talked about the budget in the Committee of the Whole Meeting, and I indicated at that time that I would appreciate having the North End Bridge separated from the 1986 budget . Staff has informed me that the way to do that is to move to have that deleted. Therefore I would move that Account Number 9902 in the sum of $9,600,000 for the North End Bridge be deleted from the motion just made. Councilwoman Moylan: I will second that motion. Councilman Andersen: There is a motion with a second on the floor now. Counsel Jentsch: His motion is in the nature of an amendment to that motion. If the amendment is passed then the bridge amount would be deleted from the budget . Mayor Verbic: First we shall vote on the amendment . Yeas: Councilmen Moylan and Waters. Nays: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Shales, Van De Voorde and Mayor Verbic. Mayor Verbic: Now we will vote on the original motion. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. i VOLUME L 951 Ordinance No. T5-85 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 1986 BUDGET IN LIEU OF PASSAGE OF AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin has provided for the preparation and adoption of an annual budget in lieu of passage of an appropriation ordinance for the fiscal year 1986; and WHEREAS, a tentative annual budget has been prepared, notice given and a tentative annual budget made available for inspection for at least ten days; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin, Illinois has conducted a public hearing on the tentative annual budget; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin, Illinois, has examined said annual budget and has heard all persons appearing and desiring to be heard concering said annual budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section I. That the tentative annual budget heretofore prepared by the budget director and placed on file as required by the statutes of the State of Illinois is hereby adopted in lieu of the passage of an appropriation ordinance for the fiscal year 1986 with the following amendments: Proposed Amended Increase Budget Budget (Decrease) 010 - GENERAL FUND Means of Financing: Unencumbered Cash Balance $ 2,905,045 $ 209450045 $ 40,000 435 Liquor Licenses 105,000 1250000 20,000 497 State Grant - Alcohol Safety - 5, 125 5, 125 5781 Rental of Buildings - Hemmens 43,000 53,000 100000 6644 Transfer from Risk Mgt. - 100,000 100,000 3,053,045 5 3,228, 170 S 175, 125 Expenditures: 011 Mayor and City Council 700 Salaries and Wages $ 40,575 $ 420545 $ 1 ,970 7051 Pension Contrib. - IMRF 4,585 4,870 285 707 Insurance Charges 18, 160 18,215 55 018 Human Relations Commission 700 Salaries and Wages $ 30,025 $ 32,510 $ 2,485 7051 Pension Contrib. - IMRF 40360 42720 360 707 Insurance Charges 3,070 31140 70 952 VOLUME L Proposed Amended Increase Budqet Budget (Decrease) 010 - GENERAL FUND (contd.) 019 Boards and Commissions 9532 Economic Dev. Commission 21 ,000 33,500 12,500 9534 Convention/Visitors Bureau 48,300 53,000 41700 9535 EDC - Special Projects - 4,000 4,000 9536 Elgin Heritage Comm. - 4,400 4,400 830 Transportation, Conf. - 5,000 5,000 050 Police Department 700 Salaries and Wages 4,058,285 4,096,420 38, 135 7052 Pension Contrib. - Police 352,900 362,900 10,000 707 Insurance Charges 547,390 552,460 5,070 720 General Operating Supplies 126, 120 126,820 700 835 Training Expense 19,250 25,670 6,420 970 Capital Additions 17,755 20,030 2,275 060 Fire Department - Fire Operations 700 Salaries and Wages 2,680,580 2,804,730 124, 150 7053 Pension Contrib. - Fire 463,500 513,500 50,000 707 Insurance Charges 341 ,615 360,765 19, 150 720 General Operating Supplies 41 ,925 46,425 4,500 082 Recreation Division 870 Miscellaneous Services 94,890 103,090 89200 088 Parks Maintenance 700 Salaries and Wages 446,585 464,890 18,305 7051 Pension Contrib. - IMRF 61 ,015 63,675 2,660 707 Insurance Charges 52,845 55,950 3, 105 089 Hemmens Building 700 Salaries and Wages 127,445 132,885 5,440 7051 Pension Contrib. - IMRF 16,815 17,605 790 707 Insurance Charges 15,680 15,720 40 190 Non-Departmental 820 Office Services - 5,600 5,600 913 Transfer tolmprv. Fund 1 ,059,070 1 ,204,070 145,000 955 Contingencies 569, 105 258,865 (310,240) $11 ,262,845 $11 ,437,970 $ 1757125 . 300 - Corporate Bond Fund Means of Financing: 401 Property Tax - Current Levy $ 1 ,755,860 $ 1 ,747,010 $ (8,850) 4011 Current Tax Levy Adjustment (225, 165) (225,900) (735) 4019 Current Property Tax Receipts 1 3530,695 �S I ,52 I 110 $ 9'585) VOLUME L 953 Proposed Amended Increase Budqet Budqet (Decrease) Bonds and Interest: 902 Interest - 1985 Corp. Purpose $ 389,675 $ 3801#090 $ (9®585) 543 - Golf Improvement Fund Means of Financing: Unencumbered Cash Balance $ (9,235) $ 501765 $ 60,000 Expenditures: 980 Major Repairs $ 40,765 $ 1001765 $ 60000 630 - Risk Manaqement Fund Expenditures: 9191 Transfer to General Fund $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 955 Contingencies 132, 140 32, 140 ( 100,000) ._.. .. 132 140 $ - - 132 14.0 Section 2. That the budget director is hereby authorized and directed to cause to be prepared and published the 1986 annual budget with the aforementioned amendments. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after January I, 1986. s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23 , 1985 Passed: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: Attest: SJ Marie Yea an Marie Yearman, City Clerk i 954 VOLUME L PETITION 61-85 REQUESTING A B-1 COMMUNITY BUSINESS DISTRICT SPECIAL USE FOR A CHURCH PROPERTY LOCATED AT 308 DUNDEE AVENUE BY THE APOSTOLIC ASSEMLY IN THE FAITH OF CHRIST JESUS ------DENIED Jim Cook: This has been recommended for denial by the Land Use Committee on a vote of 5 to 2 . Robert Lauder, 11 Lockman Circle: I just want to point out that I don't have any financial interest in this property, but these people have approached the City twice now to try and get a useage for their church. The only objections that I have heard is that it would contribute to traffic conjestion, and parking problems. They have a membership of 30 people, and before petitioning the second time they went out an bought a van to transport their people. These folks want to buy this property and establish a church and I believe serve the lateno population. Also they have interest in purchasing the property next door, which I understand is available, and the lady who owns the property is willing to let them use the property for parking in the interim. It is my own personal opinion it would be in the interest of the Cityto have this property occupied, and used by a group such as this. Councilman Andersen made a motion, seconded by Councilman Gilliam to deny Petition 61-85 . Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 IN THE CONTRACT WITH LAMP, INC. FOR OLD MAIN BUILDING Councilman Andersen made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Moylan to adopt the aforementioned resolution. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays : None. i VOLUME L 955 RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. I IN THE CONTRACT WITH LAMP, INC. FOR OLD MAIN BUILDING WHEREAS the City f Elgin has heretofore entered into a contract with Lam Y 9 P, Inc. for handicap accessibility to the Old Main Building; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable to modify the terms of the contract as is described in Change Order No. I, attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS,LGI LL OIS, that James J. Cook, City Manager, be and is hereby authorized and directed to execute Change Order No. 1, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23, 1985 Adopted: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Attest: S/ Marie Year Marie Yearman, City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 IN THE CONTRACT WITH LARRY KOESCHE BUILDERS FOR CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX IMPROVEMENTS Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Andersen to adopt the aforementioned resolution. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. 956 VOLUME L RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 IN THE CONTRACT WITH LARRY KOESCHE BUILDERS FOR CIVIC CENTER COMPLEX IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the City of Elgin has heretofore entered into a contract with Larry Koesche Builders for improvements to the Civic Center Complex; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable to modify the terms of the contract as is described in Change Order No. 2, attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, that James J. Cook, City Manager, be and is hereby authorized and directed to execute Change Order No. 2, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23, 1985 Adopted: December 23, 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Attest: qj-'t�� s/ Marie Ye rman Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED AMENDING THE 1985 BUDGET Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Moylan to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. i VOLUME 1 957 Ordinance No. T6-85 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 1985 BUDGET BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS; Section I. That the 1985 budget of the City of Elgin adopted in lieu of an appropriation ordinance be and is hereby amended in accordance with the following schedule: CITY OF ELGIN SUMMARY OF BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1985 APPROVED AMENDED 1985 1985 INCREASE FUND AND DEPARTMENT BUDGET BUDGET (DECREASE) GENERAL FUND Oil Mayor and City Council $ 96,730 $ 96,730 $ - 012 Office of the City Manager 150,745 150,745 - 013 Purchasing and Research 909130 90, 130 - 014 Personnel & Admin. Services 126,065 126,065 - 015 Legal Department 183,690 183,690 - 018 Human Relations Commission 42,090 429090 - 019 Boards and Commissions 55,200 55,200 - 020 Finance Department 731 ,040 731 ,040 - 030 Department of Buildings 311 ,655 311 ,655 - 040 Planning Department 3149140 314, 140 - 050 Police Department 59364, 185 5,364, 185 - 059 Civil Defense Division 4,485 49485 - 060 Fire Department 39274,350 39274,350 - 061 Bureau of Inspection Services 431 ,680 4319680 - 071 Public Works Administration 113, 155 1139155 - 072 Engineering Division 430, 105 430, 105 - 074 Electrical Division 490,410 4909410 - 075 Sanitation Division 826,270 826,270 - 076 Streets Division 879,745 8799745 - 077 Sewers Division 289,030 289,030 - 079 Construction Division 108,985 108,985 - 081 Parks & Recreation Admin. 800675 80,675 - 082 Recreation Division 323, 110 323, 110 - 087 Mall Coordinator 43,955 432955 - 088 Parks Maintenance 718, 195 718, 195 - 089 Hemmens Auditorium 2379760 237,760 - 190 Non-Depart mental 1 , 120,260 1 ,255,260 135,000 Total - General Fund $16,837,840 $16,972,840 $ 135,000 958 VOLUME 1 CITY OF ELGIN SUMMARY OF BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1985 APPROVED AMENDED 1985 1985 INCREASE FUND AND DEPARTMENT BUDGET BUDGET (DECREASE) SPECIAL REVENUE 200 Public Benefits Fund $ 299,025 $ 299,025 $ - 210 Road and Bridge Fund 224,000 224,000 - 230 Community Development Grant 11903,415 1 ,903,415 - 240 Spring St. Parking District 217, 110 217, 1 10 - 270 Federal Revenue Sharing Fund 731 ,380 731 ,380 - 280 I.M.R.F. Fund 1 ,471 ,990 1 ,471 ,990 - 290 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 1 ,213,290 1 ,213,290 - Total - Special Revenue $ 6,060,210 $ 6,060,210 $ - DEBT SERVICE 300 Corporate Bond Fund $ 2,075,870 $ 2,075,870 $ - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 340 Park Development Fund $ 230,000 $ 380,000 $ 150,000 350 Downtown Redevelopment Fund 55,235 55,235 - 360 Cap. Imprv. - Special Projects - 135,000 135,000 375 Cap. Imprv. - Otter Creek 795,000 795,000 - 377 Cap. Imprv. - Old Main 111065 68,000 56,935 378 Cap. Imprv. - Tyler Creek 168,790 168,790 - 380 Cap. Imprv. - 1983 Bond Issue 15,000 22,000 7,000 381 Cap. Imprv. - 1984 Bond Issue 726,795 726,795 - 382 Cap. Imprv. - 1985 Bond Issue 1 , 125,000 4,300,000 3, 175,000 383 Cap. Imprv. - SSA #4 Bond Issue - I ,500,000 1 ,500,000 385 Capital Improvement Fund 1 ,480,460 1 ,480,460 - Total - Capital Improvements $ 4,607,345 $ 9,631 ,280 $5,023,935 MUNICIPAL ENTERPRISE 400 Water Operating Fund $ 5,399,040 $ 5,399,040 $ - 410 Water Improvement Fund 553,000 553,000 - 450 Parking Operating Fund 173,910 173,910 - 455 Spring St. Parking Operating 1169010 117,610 1 ,600 500 Cemetery Operating Fund 265,025 265,025 - 540 Golf Operating Fund 474,510 474,510 - 543 Golf Improvement Fund 65,200 65,200 - 570 Transportation Operating Fund 1 ,893,690 1 ,893,690 - Total - Municipal Enterprise $ 8,940,385 $ 8,941 ,985 $ 1 ,600 TRUST AND AGENCY 600 Police Pension Fund $ 11679,700 $ 1 ,679,700 $ - 610 Fire Pension Fund 1 ,792,500 1 ,792,500 - Total - Trust and Agency $ 3,472,200 $ 3,472,200 $ - VOLUME L 959 CITY OF ELGIN SUMMARY OF BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1985 APPROVED AMENDED 1985 1985 INCREASE FUND AND DEPARTMENT BUDGET BUDGET (DECREASE) INTERNAL SERVICE 630 Risk Management Fund $ 1 ,835,945 $ 1 ,835,945 $ - 700 Municipal Garage - Ann St. 417,015 417,015 - 705 Municipal Garage - Crystal St. 534,725 534,725 - Total - Internal Service $ 2,787,685 $ 2,787,685 $ - TOTAL GROSS EXPENDITURES $44,781 ,535 $49,942,070 $5, 160,535 LESS INTERFUND TRANSFERS 5,930,800 6, 165,800 235,000 NET EXPENDITURES $3818591.735 $43,776,270 $4,925,535 i i 960 VOLUME L CITY OF ELGIN BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1985 APPROVED AMENDED 1985 1985 INCREASE FUND AND DEPARTMENT BUDGET BUDGET (DECREASE) 010 GENERAL FUND Means of Financing: 463 State Income Tax $1 ,265,000 $1 ,300,000 $ 35,000 6643 Transfer from Risk Mgt. Fund - 100,000 100,000 51 ,265000 5114001,000 135,000 Expenditures: 913 Transfer to Improvement Fund $ 581500 $ 7161,500 $ 135,000 340 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND Means of Financing: 680 Donations $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ (50,000) 688 Royalties - 200,000 200,000 5 100000 250,000 150,000 Expenditures: 990 New Construction $ 230,000 $ 380,000 $ 150,000 360 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT - SPECIAL PROJECTS Means of Financing: 6695 Transfer From General Fund $ - $ 135,000 $ 135,000 Expenditures: 955 Contingencies $ - $ 135,000 $ 135,000 377 OLD MAIN FUND Means of Financing: Unencumbered Cash $ 101765 $ 37, 140 $ 26,375 6804 Museum Donations - 30,560 30,560 10,765 67,700 561935 Expenditures 990 New Construction $ 11 1065 $ 68,000 $ 56,;935 380 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT - 1983 BOND ISSUE Means of Financing: - 0 672 Investment Income $ 10 000 $ _ {7, 00^ _ $ 7000- Expenditures: 990 New Construction $ 151000 $ 22,000 $ 7,000 382 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT - 1985 BOND ISSUE Means of Financing: 696 Sale of Bonds $1 , 125000 $43001000 $31I751 000 Expenditures: 990 New Construction $1 , 1251000 $4,300,000 $3, 175,000 a VOLUME L 961 CITY OF ELGIN BUDGET AMENDMENTS FOR THE YEAR 1985 APPROVED AMENDED 1985 1985 INCREASE FUND AND DEPARTMENT BUDGET BUDGET (DECREASE) 383 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT - S.S.A. #4 BOND ISSUE Means of Financing: 696 Sale of Bonds $ - 1 ,500,,000 $1 ,500,000 Expenditures: 990 New Construction $ - $1 ,500,000 $1 ,500,000 455 SPRING ST. PARKING OPERATING FUND Means of Financing:- 584 Parking Non-Metered Lots $ _ 60,300 $ _ 61 X900 $ _ 1 t600 Expenditures: 850 Repair and Maintenance Services $ 34,560 $ 36, 160 $ 1 ,600 630 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Expenditures: 9191 Transfer to General Fund $ - $ 100,000 $ 100,000 955 Contingencies 126, 175 26, 175 ( 100,000) 126, 175 126, 175 $ - Section 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage. s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23 , 1985 Passed: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: Attest: s/ Marie Yea.an Marie Yearman, City Clerk 962 VOLUME L RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH NEIL K. STEFFENS, MAI FOR REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL Councilwoman Moylan made a motion, seconded by Councilman Waters to adopted the aforementioned resolution. Yeas: Council- men Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. i VOLUME L 963 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH NEIL K. STEFFENS, MAI FOR REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, that James J. Cook, City Manager, and Marie Yearman, City Clerk, be and are hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement on behalf of the City of Elgin with Neil K. Steffens, MAI for real estate appraisal for the McLean Boulevard Project, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. I d P. Verbic Richard L. erbic, Mayor I Presented: December 23, 1985 Adopted: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays p Recorded: Attest: i s/ Marie Ye man Marie Yearman, City Clerk i I RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH "T" ENGINEERING SERVICE LTD. FOR REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL Councilman Andersen made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to adopt the aforementioned resolution. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. 964 VOLUME L RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH "T" ENGINEERING SERVICE LTD. FOR REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, that James J. Cook, City Manager, and Marie Yearman, City Clerk, be and are hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement on behalf of the City of Elgin with "T" Engineering Service Ltd. for real estate appraisal for the McLean Boulevard Project, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. s/ Marie Yearman Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23, 1985 Adopted: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays p Recorded: Attest: s/ Marie Ye rman Marie Yearman, City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH UNIVERSAL CONSULTANTS LIMITED FOR THE McLEAN BOULEVARD PROJECT Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to adopt the aforementioned resolution. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. I II VOLUME L 965 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH UNIVERSAL CONSULTANTS LIMITED FOR THE McLEAN BOULEVARD PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, that James J. Cook, City Manager, and Marie Yearman, City Clerk, be and are hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement on behalf of the City of Elgin with Universal Consultants Limited for negotiations for the acquisition of property for the McLean Boulevard Project, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23, 1985 Adopted: December 23, 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Attest: s/ Marie Yearma Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED AMENDING RATES FOR WATER SERVICE Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Shales to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. 966 VOLUME L Ordinance No. 10 1-85 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE RATES FOR WATER SERVICE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section 1. That Section 14.04.180A2 of Chapter 14.04 of the Elgin Municipal Code, 1976, as amended, be and is hereby amended to read as follows: "2. For each one hundred cubic feet or fraction thereof of water supplied a charge of $1.14 shall be made." Section 2. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provi- sions of this ordinance be are hereby repealed. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after January I, 1986. s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23, 1985 Passed: December 23, 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: Attest: s/ Marie Yearman Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $2, 500, 000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS (BUTLER PHARMAPAC, INC. PROJECT Councilwoman Moylan made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Shales to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. Ordinance No. S9-85 VOLUME L 967 AN ORDINANCE authorizing the issuance of $2,500,000 aggregate principal amount Economic Development Revenue Bonds (Butler PharmaPac, Inc. Project) , Series 1985, of the City of Elgin, Cook and Kane Counties, Illinois; authorizing the issuance of said bonds under Ordinance No. S2-80, as amended and supplemented, for the purpose of making a loan to Butler PharmaPac, Inc. ; authorizing the execution and delivery of a Trust Indenture securing said bonds; authorizing the execution and delivery of a Loan Agreement with said Butler PharmaPac, Inc. ; confirming the sale of said bonds to the purchaser thereof pursuant to a Bond Purchase Agreement; approving related documents; authorizing the execution and delivery of related documents; and prescribing other matters related thereto. WHEREAS, the City of Elgin, Cook and Kane Counties, Illinois (the "Issuer" ) , is an Illinois home rule municipality authorized under the provisions of Article VII, Section 6, of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, and Ordinance No. S2-80 adopted by the City Council of the Issuer on February 13, 1980, as supplemented and amended (the "Enabling Ordinance" ) , to finance in whole or in part the cost of the acquisition, purchase, construction, reconstruction, improvement, equipping, betterment or extension of economic development projects in order to encourage economic development within or near the Issuer; to lease, sell or finance the same to or for any person; and to provide for the issuance of revenue bonds in conjunction therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of a Resolution of the Issuer adopted October 14, 1985, the Issuer entered into a Memorandum of Agreement by which it agreed to issue its revenue bonds in an aggregate amount not exceeding $2,500,000 for the benefit of Butler PharmaPac, Inc. , an Illinois corporation (the "Company" ) , for the purpose of financing all or a portion of the costs of acquiring, rehabilitating and equipping a manufacturing, warehousing and office facility located at 1300 Abbott Drive, Elgin, Illinois (the "Project" ) which Project will be used by the Company in its business as a manufacturer and packager of private label pharmaceutical products; and WHEREAS, the Project constitutes a "Project" as defined in the Enabling Ordinance; and 2 - 968 VOLUME L WHEREAS, it is now proposed that the Issuer issue its Economic Development Revenue Bonds (Butler PharmaPac, Inc. Project) , Series 1985, under the provisions of the. Enabling Ordinance in the aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000 (the "Bonds" ) to provide moneys to make a loan to the Company pursuant to the Enabling Ordinance for the purpose of financing a portion of the costs of the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project; and WHEREAS, Union National Bank, a national banking association (the "Purchaser" ) has agreed to purchase the Bonds at a price equal to the aggretate principal amount of the Bonds. WHEREAS, the Issuer is empowered under the Enabling Ordinance to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Project through the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, a public hearing has been held by this City Council after reasonable public notice as required by Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the "Code" ) ; and WHEREAS, the Bonds will be issued under and pursuant to a Trust Indenture dated as of December 1, 1985 (the "Indenture" ) , by and between the Issuer and First Union National Bank, a national banking association, Charlotte, North Carolina, as Trustee (the "Trustee" ) ; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that the Issuer will make a loan of the proceeds of the Bonds to the Company as provided in the Enabling Ordinance pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of December 1, 1985 (the "Loan Agreement") , by and between the Issuer and the Company; and WHEREAS, there have been prepared and presented to this meeting the following documents: 1. The form of the Indenture, including the form of the Bonds; 2. The form of the Loan Agreement, including the form of the promissory note of the Company (the "Promissory Note") and the form of the Issuer ' s endorsement of the Promissory Note (the "Endorsement of the Promissory Note" ) , which are attached to the Loan Agreement as exhibits; 3. The form of the Guaranty Agreement dated as of December 1, 1985 (the "Guaranty" ) , from the John O. Butler Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Guarantor" ) , to the Trustee pursuant to which the Guarantor will unconditionally guarantee, among other things, the full and prompt payment of the principal installments of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds; and I 3 _ VOLUME L 969 i 4. The form of the Mortgage and Security Agreement dated as of December 1, 1985 (the "Mortgage" ) , from the Company to the Trustee granting a mortgage upon certain real estate owned by the Company and a security interest in certain machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures owned by the Company, all as security for the payment of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Promissory Note and the Bonds and as security for certain other obligations of the Company and the Guarantor; and 5. The form of the Arbitrage Regulation Agreement dated as of December 1, 1985 (the "Arbitrage Agreement" ) , to be entered into by and among the Issuer, the Trustee and the Company providing for the deposit of certain sums and the performance of certain acts with respect to arbitrage earnings on the proceeds of the Bonds; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Elgin, Cook and Kane Counties, Illinois, as follows: Section 1. Findings. It is hereby found, determined and declared by the City Council of the Issuer that: (a) the Project will provide increased job opportunities, and will retain existing jobs, within the City of Elgin, Cook and Kane Counties, Illinois; (b) the Project, the financing of the Project, and the issuance of the Bonds, are determined to be in accordance with the purposes of the Enabling Ordinance and are approved; (c) the Project constitutes a "Project" within the meaning of and authorized by the Enabling Ordinance; (d) the Project, the issuance and sale of the Bonds to finance the same, the execution and delivery of the Indenture, the Loan Agreement, the Endorsement of the Promissory Note and the Arbitrage Agreement, and the performance of all covenants and agreements of the Issuer contained therein and of all other acts and things required under the Constitution and 4 - 970 VOLUME L laws of the State of Illinois to make the Indenture, the Loan Agreement, the Endorsement of the Promissory Note, the Arbitrage Agreement and the Bonds valid and binding obligations of the Issuer in accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Enabling Ordinance; (e) it is desirable that the Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000, initially dated the date of the original issuance thereof, be issued by the Issuer upon the terms set forth in the Indenture, under the provisions of which the Issuer 's interest in the Loan Agreement, the Promissory Note and the payments due the Issuer thereunder will be pledged and assigned to First Union National Bank, a national banking association, Charlotte North Carolina (the "Trustee" ) as security for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds; (f) the principal amount of the Bonds does not exceed the estimated cost of the acquisition, rehabilitation and equipping of the Project, financing charges, interest which it is estimated will accrue on the Bonds during the construction period and costs of the issuance of the Bonds; (g) the payments required to be made by the Company under the Promissory Note and the Loan Agreement are in such amounts as will be sufficient to provide for prompt payment of all of the principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds when due; (h) under the provisions of the Enabling Ordinance, and as provided in the Indenture, the Bonds, together with interest thereon and premium, if any with respect thereto, shall not be or become an indebtedness or obligation of the Issuer, the State of Illinois or any political subdivision thereof within the purview of any constitutional limitation or provision; the Bonds and the interest and premium, if any, payable thereon shall be special, limited obligations of the Issuer, payable solely and only from revenues pledged for their repayment, including revenues and receipts derived from and pursuant to the Promissory Note, the Loan Agreement, the Mortgage and the Guaranty; and it shall be stated on the face of the Bonds that they do not constitute such an indebtedness or obligation of the Issuer but are payable solely from such revenues; (i) the principal amount of the Bonds, their maturity dates and annual interest rate are as set forth in Section 2 hereof; and 5 - VOLUME L gel ( j ) No member of the City Council of the Issuer or officer, agent or employee of the Issuer has any interest, financial, employment or other, in the Company or in the transactions contemplated hereby or by the Indenture or the Loan Agreement or the issuance and sale of the Bonds. Section 2. Terms of the Bonds. For the purpose of financing the acquisition, rehabilitation and equipping of the Project, there are hereby authorized to be issued the Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000, which bonds shall be designated "City of Elgin, Illinois Economic Development Revenue Bonds (Butler PharmaPac, Inc. Project) , Series 1985" ; shall bear interest from their date; shall be issuable only as registered bonds without coupons in the denomination of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof; shall be initially dated the date of delivery thereof when originally issued; and shall mature as to principal on December 1, 2000, and shall be subject to mandatory redemption pursuant to the terms of the sinking fund provided in the Indenture in the principal amount of $42,000.00 on the first day of each March, June, September and December, commencing March 1, 1986, to and including September 1, 2000. Subject to the provisions for redemption set forth in Article III of the Indenture, the Bonds shall bear interest on the unpaid principal amount thereof from the date thereof at an interest rate (the "Floating Rate") , subject to adjustment as herein specified, equal to ( i) sixty percent (60%) of the rate of interest announced from time to time by First Union National Bank, in Charlotte, North Carolina ( "FUNB" ) , to be its prime rate (the "Prime Rate" ) plus two percent ( 2%) per annum to and including March 30, 1986, and (ii) sixty percent (60%) of the Prime Rate thereafter, payable quarterly on the first day of each March, June, September and December, commencing March 1, 1986, plus additional interest upon a Determination of Taxability as described in the Indenture. On December 1, 2000, the Issuer shall pay an amount necessary to repay in full the unpaid amount of principal thereof, interest thereon, and all other amounts payable thereunder . Any change in the Prime Rate shall be effective on the date of any such change. Interest shall be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year, and shall be payable for the actual number of days elapsed. The principal of, interest on, and all other amounts payable under the Bonds are payable in any coin or currency of the United States of America which on the respective dates of payment thereof shall be legal tender for the payment of public and private debts, solely from said special fund, to the registered owners of the Bonds by check or draft at their addresses as they appear on the Bond registration books maintained by the 6 972 VOLUME L Trustee, as Bond Registrar, or, if requested by such registered owner, by wire transfer, to the account of the registered owner thereof specified by notice from such owner to the Bond Registrar and noted on said Bond registration books. In the event the Issuer should fail to make any payments required on the Bonds, the item or installment so in default shall continue as an obligation of the Issuer until the amount in default shall have been fully paid, and the Issuer shall pay the same with interest on overdue principal and, to the extent permitted by law, on overdue interest at the Prime Rate plus two percent per annum. If at any time after December 1, 1985, there should be any change in the maximum statutory rate of Federal income tax applicable to the taxable income in excess of $100,000 of FUNB under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (as the same may be in effect from time to time, the "FUNB Tax Rate" ) , then the Floating Rate will be adjusted, effective as of the effective date of the change in the FUNB Tax Rate, by multiplying the Floating Rate by a fraction, the denominator of which is 100% minus the FUNB Tax Rate on December 1, 1985, and the numerator of which is 100% minus the FUNB Tax Rate after giving effect to such change. So long as any of the principal amount of any Bonds or interest thereon or any other amount payable thereunder remains unpaid, if ( i) any law, rule, regulation or executive order is enacted or promulgated by any public body or governmental agency which changes the basis of taxation on payments to any holder or former holder of any Bonds of principal, interest, or any other amount payable pursuant to any Bond, including without limitation the imposition of any excise tax or surcharge, but excluding changes in the rates which are applicable to the overall net income of any holder or former holder of any Bonds, or ( ii) as a result of action by any public body or governmental agency, payment is required to be made by, or any Federal, state or local income tax deduction is disallowed to, any holder or former holder of any Bonds by reason of ownership of, borrowing money to invest in, or receiving principal, interest, or any other amount from any Bonds, the Issuer agrees to reimburse and indemnify each such holder and former holder upon demand, but only from amounts paid by the Company under the Promissory Note and deposited in the Bond Fund established under the Indenture, against any loss, cost, charge or expense with respect to any such change, payment or loss of deduction. Any such holder or former holder of any of the Bonds shall receive payment under this paragraph only after furnishing a written demand to the Trustee, together with evidence satisfactory to the Trustee that any such loss, cost, charge or expense has been incurred. _ 7 _ VOLUME L 973 The Bonds shall be subject to redemption or mandatory purchase by the Company or its designee prior to maturity as provided in Article III of the Indenture. The Bonds shall be special, limited obligations of the Issuer as more fully provided in Section 1(h) of this Ordinance. As required by the Enabling Ordinance and as provided in Section 1(h) of this Ordinance, it shall be plainly stated on the face of the Bonds that it is a special, limited obligation of the Issuer as more fully provided in said Section 1(h) hereof. Section 3. Execution of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be executed on behalf of the Issuer by the manual or facsimile signature of its Mayor and attested by the manual or facsimile signature of its City Clerk, provided that one of such signatures shall be manual; shall have the seal of the Issuer affixed thereto; and shall be authenticated by the certificate of the Trustee. Section 4 . Form of the Bonds. The Bonds and the Trustee's certificate of authentication to appear on the Bonds shall be in substantially the forms set forth in the Indenture, with necessary or appropriate variations, omissions and insertions, as permitted or required by the Indenture. Section 5. Compliance with the Enabling Ordinance. The Bonds shall be issued in compliance with and under authority of the provisions of the Enabling Ordinance, this Ordinance and the Indenture. Section 6. Approval of Indenture, Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Arbitrage Agreement. The form, terms and provisions of the proposed Indenture, Loan Agreement, Promissory Note and Arbitrage Agreement are in all respects approved, and the Mayor and the City Clerk of the Issuer are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to execute, acknowledge and deliver the Indenture, the Loan Agreement, the Endorsement of the Promissory Note and the Arbitrage Agreement in the name and on behalf of the Issuer, and thereupon to cause the Indenture to be executed, acknowledged and delivered by the Trustee, and the Indenture shall constitute an assignment by the Issuer of the Security for the Bonds, as defined therein. The Indenture, the Loan Agreement, the Endorsement of the Promissory Note and the Arbitrage Agreement as executed and delivered, shall be in substantially the form now before this meeting and hereby approved, or with such changes therein as shall be approved by the officers of the Issuer executing the same, their execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of the Issuer ' s approval of any and all changes or revisions i _ 8 _ i 974 VOLUME L therein from the form of such documents now before this meeting. From and after the execution and delivery of the Indenture, the Loan Agreement, the Endorsement of the Promissory Note and the Arbitrage Agreement, the officers, agents and employees of the Issuer are authorized, empowered - and directed to do all such acts and things and to execute all such documents as may be necessary to carry out and comply with the provisions of such documents as executed. Section 7. Approval of the Mortgage and the Guaranty. The form, terms and provisions of the proposed Mortgage and the Guaranty are in all respects hereby approved, with such changes therein as shall be approved by the parties executing such documents. Section 8. Approval of Sale of the Bonds. The sale to the Purchaser of the Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000, at a purchase price equal to the principal amount of the Bonds sold, is hereby approved. The purchase price of the Bonds shall be disbursed by crediting the principal amount of $2,500,000 to the Constructions Fund established under the provisions of the Indenture. From and after the execution and delivery of the Bond Purchase Agreement, the officers, agents and employees of the Issuer are authorized, empowered and directed to do all such acts and things and to execute all such documents as may be necessary to carry out and comply with the provisions of the Bond Purchase Agreement as executed. Section 9. Delegation. The Mayor and City Clerk of the Issuer, for and on behalf of the Issuer, are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to do any and all things necessary to effect the execution and delivery of the Indenture, the Loan Agreement, the Endorsement of the Promissory Note, the Arbitrage Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement, the performance of all obligations of the Issuer under and pursuant to the Indenture, the Loan Agreement, the Endorsement of the Promissory Note, the Arbitrage Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement, the execution and delivery of the Bonds, and the performance of all other acts of whatever nature necessary to effect and carry out the authority conferred by this Ordinance and by the Indenture, the Loan Agreement, the Endorsement of the Promissory Note, the Arbitrage Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement. The Mayor and the City Clerk of 9 - VOLUME L 975 the Issuer are further authorized, empowered and directed, for and on behalf of the Issuer, to execute all papers, documents, certificates and other instruments that may be required in order to carry out the authority conferred by this Ordinance and by the Indenture, the Loan Agreement, the Endorsement of the Promissory Note, the Arbitrage Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement, or to evidence the said authority and its exercise. Section 10. Proceedings of the Issuer . The Mayor, City Clerk and other officers of the Issuer are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser certified copies of all proceedings and records of the Issuer relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them. Section 11. Arbitrage Certificate. The Mayor, City Clerk and any other officer of the Issuer having responsibility with respect to issuance of the Bonds are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to give an appropriate certificate for inclusion in the transcript of proceedings with respect to the Bonds, upon receipt of appropriate assurances in writing from the Company, setting forth the facts, estimates and reasonable expectations pertinent under Section 103(c) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder. Section 12. Section 103(b) (6) (D) Election. The Issuer hereby elects to have the provisions as to the $10,000,000 limit in Section 103(b) (6) (D) of the Code applied to the Bonds, and the Mayor and City Clerk of the Issuer are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to take any and all further action which may be required to implement and effectuate such election, including, without limitation, the preparation and filing of such statement or statements or other document or documents as may be deemed by them to be necessary or advisable in order to comply with the procedure set forth in Section 1.103-10(b) (2) (vi) of the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR Part 1) under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended; and all acts heretofore taken by them in this connection are hereby ratified and confirmed. Section 13. Filing Form 8038. The Mayor and City Clerk of the Issuer are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to take any and all action which may be required to comply with the information reporting requirements of Section 103(1) of the Code including, without limitation, the execution and filing of IRS Form 8038. 10 - 976 VOLUME L Section 14. Bond Registrar. The Issuer shall cause books for the registration and transfer of the Bonds as provided in the Indenture to be kept by the Trustee which is hereby constituted and appointed the Bond Registrar of the Issuer . The duties of the Trustee as such Bond Registrar shall - be as set forth in the Indenture. Section 15. Expiration. This Ordinance and each of the provisions hereof and the approvals made and the powers and authorities granted hereunder shall expire and become null and void in the event that the Bonds are not originally issued on or prior to December 31, 1985. Section 16. Severability. The provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be severable and if any section, phrase or provision shall for any reason be declared to be invalid, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the sections, phrases and provisions hereof. Section 17 . Repealer . All ordinances and resolutions and parts thereof in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed. Section 18. Allocation. The adoption of this Ordinance by the City Council of the Issuer shall be deemed to constitute an allocation to the Bonds of $2,500,000 of the Issuer ' s share of the private activity bond limit of the State of Illinois under Section 103(n) of the Code, and the Mayor of the Issuer is authorized to execute a certificate under penalty of perjury, as required by Section 103(n) (12) of the Code, that such allocation was not made in consideration of any bribe, gift, gratuity, or direct or indirect contribution to any political campaign. Section 19. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. Adopted this 23rd day of December, 1985. I - 11 - VOLUME L 977 It was thereupon moved by Councilman Moylan and seconded by Councilman Shales that said Ordinance be adopted. Upon roll being called, the following voted: Aye: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nay: None. (Other Business) I I I i i 12 - 978 VOLUME L STATE OF ILLINOIS ) )SS COUNTY OF COOK ) I, Marie Yearman , hereby certify that I am the . duly qualified and acting City Clerk of the City of Elgin, Cook and Kane Counties, Illinois, and as such official I further certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of an Ordinance entitled: AN ORDINANCE authorizing the issuance of $2,500,000 principal amount Economic Development Revenue Bonds (Butler PharmaPac, Inc. Project) , Series 1985, of the City of Elgin, Cook and Kane Counties, Illinois; authorizing the issuance of said bonds under Ordinance No. S2-80, as amended and supplemented, for the purpose of making a loan to Butler PharmaPac, Inc. ; authorizing the execution and delivery of an Indenture securing said bonds; authorizing the execution and delivery of a Loan Agreement with said Butler PharmaPac, Inc. ; confirming the sale of said bonds to the purchaser thereof pursuant to a Bond Purchase Agreement; approving related documents; authorizing the execution and delivery of related documents; and prescribing other matters related thereto. duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Elgin, Cook and Kane Counties, Illinois, on December 23, 1985, at a duly called and convened meeting held on such date, and of excerpts from the minutes of said meeting; that I have compared said excerpts with the original minute record of said meeting in my official custody; and that said excerpts are a true, correct and complete transcript from said original minute record insofar as said original record relates to the issuance by said City of its Economic Development Revenue Bonds (Butler PharmaPac, Inc. Project) , Series 1985, in an aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000; and that said Ordinance is in full force and effect and has not been modified, amended, repealed or rescinded. WITNESS my official signature and the seal of the City of Elgin, Cook and Kane Counties, Illinois, this day of December, 1985. City Clerk (SEAL) 13 - VOLUME L 979 0825K 12/20/85 The Mayor and City Council of the City of Elgin, Cook and Kane Counties, Illinois, met in a regularly scheduled and duly called and convened public session at the Elgin City Hall, 150 Dexter Court, Elgin, Illinois, at eight o'clock P .M. , on December 23, 1985, with Richard L. Verbic Mayor, and with the following named Councilmen present: I Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde and Waters. I Absent: None I I I (Other Business) The following Ordinance was thereupon introduced in written form by Councilman Moyipn 980 VOLUME L PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ISSUANCE OF $1, 500, 000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS - UNIVERSAL CHEMICAL & COATINGS PROJECT I Mayor Verbic: Is there anyone present who would like to participate in this public hearing. (no response) Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Andersen to close the public hearing. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. ORDINANCE PASSED AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $1, 500,000 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS - UNIVERSAL CHEMICALS & COATINGS, INC. PROJECT Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Moylan to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. VOLUME L 981 ORDINANCE NO. S10-85 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ADDITIONAL FINANCING BY THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, OF A PROJECT CONSISTING OF THE ACQUISITION OF LAND AND OF THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF BUILDINGS AND EQUIPMENT TO BE USED AS A MANUFACTURING FACILITY TO BE LOCATED THEREON IN ORDER TO CREATE AND RETAIN EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE LOCALITY OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS AND ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT THEREIN, THEREBY REDUCING THE EVILS ATTENDANT UPON UNEMPLOYMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE INCREASED WELFARE AND PROSPERITY OF THE RESIDENTS OF SAID LOCALITY; AUTHORIZING AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS OF ITS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND (UNIVERSAL CHEMICALS AND COATINGS, INC. PROJECT) SERIES 1985 IN'THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $1,500,000, AND IN CONNECTION THEREWITH AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN AGREEMENT AMONG THE CITY, UNIVERSAL CHEMICALS AND COATINGS, INC. AND THE AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CHICAGO, PROVIDING FOR THE MAKING OF A LOAN TO UNIVERSAL CHEMICALS AND COATINGS, INC. FROM THE PROCEEDS OF SAID BOND, THE SECURITY FOR SAID BOND, THE SALE OF SAID BOND TO THE AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CHICAGO; AND RELATED MATTERS. WHEREAS, pursuant to its home rule powers and pursuant to City of Elgin Ordinance No. S2-80 (the "Act"), the City of Elgin, Illinois (the "Issuer"), a municipality and home rule unit of the State of Illinois, has the power to issue its revenue bonds to finance facilities for the purpose of creating or retaining employment opportunities within the locality of the Issuer and encouraging economic development therein, thereby reducing the evils attendant upon unemployment and providing for the increased welfare and prosperity of the residents of said locality; and WHEREAS, pursuant to a Memorandum of Agreement dated November 25, 1985 between the Issuer and Universal Chemicals and Coatings, Inc. (hereinafter sometimes referred to as the "Company"), a Delaware corporation, the Issuer in order to further the public purposes set forth above, agreed to issue its economic development revenue bond to provide additional funds to finance completion of the constructing and equipping of buildings used as a manufacturing facility within the corporate limits of the Issuer (the "Project"). 982 VOLUME L WHEREAS, the Issuer is willing to issue its revenue bond to finance a portion of the cost of the Project and to enter into an Agreement with the Company and American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago (the "Institutional Lender"), upon terms which will produce revenues and receipts sufficient to provide for the prompt payment at maturity of the principal and interest on such revenue bond, all as set forth in the provisions of the Agreement hereinafter identified; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982, and public notice published on December 6 , 1985, in the Daily Courier News, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Elgin, a public hearing on the plan of financing for the Project was held by the City Council on December 23, 1984; and WHEREAS, the Issuer hereby finds that the issuance of the proposed revenue bond will further the public purposes set forth above, and the same is a matter pertaining to the government and affairs of the Issuer; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to authorize the execution of an Agreement to be dated as of December 1, 1985 (the "Agreement'l among the Issuer, the Company and the Institutional Lender, under the terms of which the Issuer agrees to sell its industrial development revenue bond to the Institutional Lender and to lend the proceeds to the Company, and the Company agrees to mortgage the Project and to assign certain contracts and to pay to the Issuer or its assignee amounts sufficient to pay at maturity the principal of and interest on the revenue bond hereinafter authorized and will evidence such obligations by executing its direct obligation note in the principal amount of $1,500,000 (the "Note"); and WHEREAS, it is necessary to authorize the issuance and sale of said economic development revenue bond to the Institutional Lender; and -2- VOLUME L 983 WHEREAS, the Issuer has caused to be prepared and presented to this meeting the following documents, which the Issuer proposes to enter into: 1. The form of Agreement; 2. The form of Mortgage and Security Agreement; 3. The form of Collateral Assignment; 4. The form of the proposed $1,500,000 City of Elgin, Illinois Economic Development Revenue Bond (Universal Chemicals and Coatings, Inc. Project) Series 1985 (the "Bond"); and 5. The form of Assignment and Security Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the form, terms and provisions of the proposed Agreement be, and they hereby are, in all respects approved, and that the Mayor of the Issuer is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to execute, and the City Clerk of the Issuer is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to attest and to affix the seal of the Issuer to, the Agreement in the name and on behalf of the Issuer, and thereupon to cause the Agreement to be delivered to the Company and the Institutional Lender; that the Agreement is to be in substantially the form presented to and before this meeting and hereby approved, and that from and after the execution and delivery of the Agreement, the officials, agents and employees of the Issuer are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to do all such acts and things and to execute all such documents as may be necessary to carry out and comply with the provisions of the Agreement as executed. Section 2. That the form, terms and provisions of the proposed Assignment be, and they hereby are, in all respects approved, and that the Mayor of the Issuer is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to execute, and the City Clerk of the Issuer is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to attest and to affix the seal of the Issuer to, the Assignment in the name and on behalf of the Issuer, and thereupon to cause the -3- 984 VOLUME 1 Assignment to be delivered to the Institutional Lender, and the Assignment shall constitute a lien for the security of the Bond issued under the Agreement upon the revenues and receipts derived from the Agreement, including, but not limited to, the Note, the Collateral Assignment (the "Collateral Assignment") and the Mortgage and Security Agreement (the "Mortgage"); that the Assignment is to be in substantially the form presented to this meeting and hereby approved, and that from and after the execution and delivery of the Assignment, the officials, agents and employees of the Issuer are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to do all such acts and things and to execute all such documents as may be necessary to carry out and comply with he provisions of the Assignment as executed. Section 3. (a) That the Mayor or the City Clerk of the Issuer be and each of them is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to cause the Bond to be prepared in the principal amount of $1,500,000; that the Bond will be dated the date of issuance and will be payable in equal quarterly installments of Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000) on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 30 (the "Payment Dates") with the first installment due on March 31, 1986 and the final installment due on December 30, 1990. The Bond will be expressed to bear interest on the unpaid principal balance from the date of its issuance at a varying rate per annum which shall be seventy percent (70%) of the rate of interest publicly announced from time to time by the American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago as its prime rate (the "Prime Rate'l with adjustments in such varying rate to be made on the same date as any announced change in the Prime Rate, provided however that except upon the occurrence of an event requiring purchase of the Bond pursuant to the Contingent Purchase Agreement the rate of interest borne by the Bond and the Note shall never be less than six percent (6%) per annum nor more than nine percent (946) per annum and provided further that any changes in the Prime Rate occurring within 15 days before any Payment Date resulting in an increase or decrease in -4- VOLUME L 985 the interest which would otherwise be payable on such Payment Date, shall not, if an increase, be payable by the Company on such Payment Date, but shall instead be payable on the next succeeding Payment Date or shall, if a decrease, reduce the amount which i would otherwise be payable on the next succeeding Payment Date. Interest shall be calculated, for actual days elapsed, on a 360 day year. In the event of a declaration of default by the Institutional Lender, interest on overdue principal and, to the extent permitted by law, on overdue interest, shall be payable on demand at a rate equal to the Prime Rate then in effect plus three percent (3%) per annum until paid. The Bond shall be in the form of a single typewritten registered Bond, payable in such medium of payment and at such place, subject to such terms of prepayment and redemption and containing such other terms and provisions specified in the Agreement (as executed and delivered) and shall be executed in the name of the Issuer with the manual signatures of the Mayor and the City Clerk of the Issuer, and the seal of the Issuer shall be affixed thereto or imprinted thereon. (b)The Bond will be issued pursuant to the Act and will not constitute a general obligation of the Issuer, but will be a limited obligation of the Issuer, payable solely out of the income and revenues of the Issuer to be derived from the Project pursuant to the Agreement. No holder of the Bond shall have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the Issuer, or the State of Illinois or any political subdivision thereof, to pay the Bond or the interest or premium, if any, thereon, and the Bond will not constitute an indebtedness or a loan of credit of the Issuer, the State of Illinois or any political subdivision thereof, or a charge against their general credit or taxing powers, within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory provision. (c)Neither the Issuer nor the State of Illinois or any political subdivision thereof shall in any event be liable for the payment of principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bond, or for damages arising out of the failure to perform any pledge, mortgage, obligation or Agreement of any kind whatsoever of the Issuer. -5- 986 VOLUME L (d)Neither the Bond nor any of the Issuer's agreements or obligations thereunder will constitute an indebtedness or a loan of credit of the Issuer or of the State of Illinois or any political subdivision thereof within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory provision whatsoever, nor shall the Bond be construed to create any moral obligation of the Issuer, the State of Illinois or any political subdivision thereof. Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the Issuer or the State of Illinois or any i political subdivision thereof is pledged to the payment of the principal of the Bond, the interest or any premium thereon, or other costs incident thereto. (e)No recourse shall be had for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bond or for any claim based thereon or upon any obligation, covenant or Agreement contained in this Ordinance, the Agreement, the Assignment, or in any other instrument contemplated therein, against any past, present or future official, officer, agent or employee of the Issuer, or any successor corporation, as such, either directly or through the Issuer or any successor corporation, under any rule of law or equity, statute or constitution or by the enforcement of any assessment or penalty or otherwise. Section 4. That the form of the Bond submitted to this meeting, subject to appropriate insertion and revision in order to comply with the provisions of the I Agreement be, and the same hereby is, approved and when the same shall be executed on behalf of the Issuer in the manner contemplated by the Agreement and this Ordinance in the principal amount of $1,500,000, it shall represent the approved form of the Bond of the Issuer. Seetion.. 5., That the Mayor of the Issuer be and is hereby authorized, empowered ,*nd d1reeted, for and on behalf of the Issuer, to issue and sell to the Institutional Lender the Bond in the principal face amount of $1,500,000 at a price and on terms and conditions as provided in the Agreement. -6- VOLUME L 987 Section 6. That from and after the execution and delivery of said documents, the proper officials, agents and employees of the Issuer are hereby authorized, empowered and directed to do all such acts and things and to execute all such documents as may be necessary to carry out and comply with the provisions of the Assignment, the Agreement and the Bond as executed and to further the purposes and intent of this Ordinance, including the preamble hereto. Section 7. That adoption of the Ordinance by the corporate authorities of the Issuer and the approval hereof by the Mayor of the Issuer shall constitute the approval by the "applicable elected representative" required by Section 103(k)(2)(B)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (the "Code"). Section 8. That the Issuer elects to have the provisions of Section 103(b)(6)(D) of the Code apply to the Bond, and the Mayor or City Clerk is hereby authorized and direct to file or cause to be filed an appropriate statement relating to such election with the Internal Revenue Service (relating to the temporary period) pertaining to Section 103(c) of the Code. Section 9. That the provisions of the Agreement require the Company to bear the risks of any loss that may result from investments of monies as held as part of the proceeds of the Bond, and the City Council hereby finds and determines that the i authorization to the Institutional Lender to invest monies held as part of such proceeds as provided in the Agreement will not involve any undue risk of loss of funds derived j from the general revenue of the Issuer. Section 10. That no covenant, stipulation, obligation or Agreement herein contained, or contained in any instrument or document executed in connection with the I Project shall be deemed to be a covenant, stipulation, obligation or Agreement of any of the corporate authorities of the Issuer or any officer, agent or employee of the Issuer in -7- 988 VOLUME L their individual capacities, and neither the corporate authorities of the Issuer nor any officer of the Issuer executing the Bond shall be liable personally on the Bond or subject to any personal liability or accountability by reason of the issuance thereof. Section 11. That all acts and doings of the officials of the Issuer which are in conformity with the purposes and intent of this Ordinance and in furtherance of the issuance and sale of the Bond and the financing of the Project be, and the same hereby are, in all respects, approved and confirmed. Section 12. That the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby declared to be separable, and if any section, phrase or provision shall, for any reason, be declared to be invalid, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remainder of the sections, phrases or provisions hereof. Section 13. That notwithstanding any other provisions of law to the contrary, the Bond, the Agreement, and any transaction provided for therein shall not be void by reason of the pecuniary interest therein of any of the corporate authorities of the Issuer. Section 14. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 15. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and approval and its filing in the records of the Issuer by the City Clerk. s/ Richard L. Verbic Mayor Passed: December 23 , 1985 Approved: December 23 , 1985 Published: Attest: s/ Marie Yearm n City Clerk -8- VOLUME L 989 RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR ENGINERRING SERVICES WITH H. W. LOCHNER Councilwoman Shales: I was taken back when I received that report by Lochner. I really would like some explanation of how he came to the conclusion that we read and then changed his mind. I think this Phase I is going to give us some of the information we need to know as to whether this bridge is really going to work. At the same time can a citizen 's group, such as Mr. Cook was talking about at the Chamber of Commerce Meeting, be looking at this North End Bridge. Jim Cook: Yes, the contract is written to that it is interruptable at each of the phases, so he can do the preliminary study, bring in to you the report that shows preliminary plans, drawings and the precise demands and a better cost estimate, and at that time before he can proceed to final plans and specifications, bids and acquisition of property, Council will have to concur in the moving ahead to that step, and at any point along that line, if we proceed with the type of citizen 's study it can be stopped at that point or amended at that point if the Council sees fit . Councilwoman Shales: I still have two concerns, the cost of the project for the little return, I do think we need a north end bridge and I don 't think that the tollway is any kind of a solution for our traffic problem, but I do have a great understanding and concern about the cost and the impact on the neighborhood. I would like to minimize that as much as possible. Councilman Van De Voorde: There are two members of this Council that were not on the Council when some of the presentation was given, I being one of them, and I would appreciate it if this firm could address some of the questions that some of the Council members have. Councilwoman Moylan: Will Mr. Lochner be doing traffic studies. Jim Cook: I would not expect him to do it , but we could get them done. Councilwoman Moylan: That is the main reason that I have consistently voted against the north end bridge. Traffic studies that were done two years ago did not bear that weight of the huge expense for this bridge. If there were new traffic pt»dies_ I would be interested to, see them, I would want 990 VOLUME L to see them. I want to see the impact on the neighborhood. . Mr. Fox: I want to thank Councilwoman Shales for suggesting this, the only point I was going to raise is if it would be possible if the engineering study was to go through if some representatives from our neighborhood association and the rest of the city could be part of this so maybe we could help too. Councilwoman Shales: That is what I was suggesting by way of a citizen's group. Jim Cook: A traffic study can be done but it will be hard to pin down the figures because the projections from Expo will not be there and it will be a extremely difficult type of subjective traffic report . A traffic analysis of existing traffic is not really going to give you the details because right now you have traffic that is going south, or you have traffic that is coming in from 19 and coming in on Summit and going south that presumably would go north and riot go through the downtown if they had this alternative, but we can do some traffic studies and do some traffic generation as to how much traffic is coming and do some projecting. Mayor Verbic: There are so many uncertain things and Jim you point out a lot of them. There is Expo and you are not going to be able to project how much that will generate. Councilman Van De Voorde: The Lochner study stated this was a much needed bridge and I am sure they must have some traffic information they could give us . Councilwoman Moylan: Just see what they have. Councilman Andersen made a motion, seconded by Councilman Gilliam to pass the aforementioned resolution. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, and Mayor `v"erbic. Nays: Councilman Waters. VOLUME L 991 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH H. W. LOCHNER, INC. i WHEREAS, the City of Elgin finds that it is necessary and desirable to contract with H. W. Lochner, Inc. for further engineering services for the design and supervision of construction of bridge across the Fox River. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, that upon approval by the County of Kane, James J. Cook, City Manager, and Marie Yearman, City Clerk, are respectively authorized and directed, on behalf of the City of Elgin, to execute and affix the corporate seal of the City of Elgin to a supplemental agreement for engineering services with H. W. Lochner, Inc., a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. I s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor i Presented: December 9, 1985 Adopted: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 6 Nays 1 Recorded: Attest: ts ��' i @ �' ..uC c/ Yeai`irt an Marie earman, City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AMENDED AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF KANE Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilman Gilliam to adopt the aforementioned resolution. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Shales, Van De Voorde and Mayor Verbic. Nays: Councilmen Moylan and Waters. 992 VOLUME L RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDED AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY OF KANE WHEREAS, the City of Elgin and County of Kane have heretofore respectively executed a memorandum of agreement concerning certain public improvements in the nature of a bridge spanning the Fox River within the City of Elgin; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable to amend said agreement. I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, that upon approval by the County of Kane, James J. Cook, City Manager, and Marie Yearman, City Clerk, are hereby respectively authorized and directed on behalf of the City of Elgin to execute and affix the corporate seal of the City of Elgin to an amended agreement with the County of Kane, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. I 5/Richard L. Verbic kichard L. Verbic, Mayor i Presented: December 9, 1985 Adopted: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 5 Nays 2 Recorded: Attest: s/ Marie m Ln Marie Yearman, ity Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED AMENDING CERTAIN PARKING RESTRICTIONS WITHIN ELGIN Councilwoman Shales made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to pass to aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. VOLUME L 993 i Ordinance No. G102-85 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CERTAIN PARKING RESTRICTIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF ELGIN BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section I. That Title 11, Chapter 11.36 of the Elgin Municipal Code, 1976, as amended, be and is hereby further amended by deleting from the list of limited parking areas for buses only under Section 1 1.36.085 the following: I Park Street, north side, from Academy Place to College Street. Section 2. That Title 11, Chapter 11.36 of the Elgin Municipal Code, 1976, as amended, be and is hereby further amended by adding to the list of limited parking areas for buses only under Section 1 1.36.085 the following: I Park Street, north side, easterly from the east curbline of Academy Place for a distance of 249 feet between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Section 3. That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provi- sions of this ordinance be and are hereby repealed. Section 4. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect ten days after its passage and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by .tow. I i i sl Richard L. Verbic I Richard L. Verbic, Mayor i Presented: December 23, 1985 Passed: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Noys 0 Recorded: Published: Attest: g/ Maria VP.A Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED RECLASSIFYING PROPERTY AT 401 NORTH STATE FROM M-1 LIMITED MANUFACTURING DISTRICT TO B-4 GENERAL SERVICE DISTRICT Councilman Van De Voorde made a motion, seconded by Councilman - Waters to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. 994 VOLUME L Ordinance No. G103-85 AN ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING PROPERTY AT 401 NORTH STATE STREET FROM M-1 LIMITED MANUFACTURING DISTRICT TO B-4 GENERAL SERVICE DISTRICT WHEREAS, written application has been made to reclassify certain property located at 401 North State Street from M-1 Limited Manufacturing District to B-4 General Service District; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Committee has conducted a public hearing after due notice and submitted its written findings and recommendations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the recommendations of the Land Use Committee and concurs in such recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section I. That Chapter 19.08, Section 19.08.020, entitled "Zoning District Map" of the Elgin Municipal Code, 1976, as amended, be and the some is hereby further amended by adding thereto the following paragraph: "The boundaries hereinbefore laid out in the 'Zoning District Map', as amended, be and are hereby altered by excluding from the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and including in the B-4 General Service District, the following described property: That part of Lot 156 (CLVI) of the County Clerk's Subdivision to Elgin, Kane County, Illinois as per the plat recorded in Map Book 9 in the recorders office of Kane County, Illinois and being part of the South half of Section I I and part of the North half of Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 8 East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the Southerly line of Wing Street with the Easterly line of North State Street; thence Southerly, along said Easterly line, a distance of 1 19.50 feet to angle in said Easle •ly line; thence Southerly, along said Easterly line, a distance of 24.83 feel for the point of beginning; thence Easterly, at right angles to the said Easterly line of North State Street, a distance of 48.28 feet (deed being 46.0 feet) to the Westerly right of way line of the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company, as recorded April 19, 1983; thence Southerly, along said Westerly right of way line, a distance of 290.40 feet (deed being 290.40 feet); thence Westerly, along a line at right angles to the Easterly line of North State Street, a distance of 78.51 feet (deed being 81.0 feet) to the Easterly line of North State Street; thence Northerly, along the Easterly line of North State Street, a distance of 288.82 feet (deed being 287.0 feet) to the point of beginning, in the City of Elgin, Kane County, Illinois." Section 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law and shall be published in pamphlet form by authority of the City Council. s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor i VOLUME L 995 Presented: December 23, 1985 Passed: December 23, 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: Attest: s./ Marie Y_ rman Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED RECLASSIFYING PROPERTY AT 1020 NORTH McLEAN BOULEVARD FROM M-1 LIMITED MANU- FACTURING DISTRICT TO B-4 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT Councilwoman Moylan made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Shales to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales , Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. 996 VOLUME L Ordinance No. GI04-85 AN ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING PROPERTY AT 1020 NORTH McLEAN BOULEVARD FROM M-1 LIMITED MANUFACTURING DISTRICT TO B-4 GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT WHEREAS, written application has been made to reclassify certain property located at 1020 North McLean Boulevard from M-I Limited Manufacturing District to B-4 General Business District; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Committee has conducted a public hearing after due notice and submitted its written findings and recommendations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the recommendations of the Land Use Committee and concurs in such recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section I. That Chapter 19.08, Section 19.08.020, entitled "Zoning District Map" of the Elgin Municipal Code, 1976, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by adding thereto the following paragraph: "The boundaries hereinbefore laid out in the 'Zoning District Map', as amended, be and are hereby altered by excluding from the M-1 Limited Manufacturing District and including in the B-4 General Business District, the following described property: That part of the Northwest V4 of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 9 East of the Third Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the center line of Sleepy Hollow Road with a line drawn parallel with and 50 feet Northerly of, measured at right angles thereto, the center line of the main track of the Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company as said track was located on April 12, 1971; thence North 79 degrees 56 minutes West along said parallel line 740 feet to the Easterly line extended Southerly of premises conveyed. to Chicago and Pacific Railroad Company by deed recorded Decerriber 27, 1892 in Book 321, Page 304 as Document No. 527; thence North 0 degrees 55 minutes East along the extension of and the Easterly line of said pr!-raises, 189.1 feet to the Southerly line of the premises conveyed to said Chicago and Pacific Railroad Company by deed recorded December 16, 1876 Book 164, Page 575, as Document No. 117; thence South 89 degrees 05 minutes East along said Southerly line, 725.80 feet to the center tine of said 'sleepy s lollow Road; thence South along said center tine 307 feat to the poing of beginning, in the City of Elgin, Kane County, Illinois. Except- ing therefrom that portion lying in the right of way of McLean Boulevard as per Dedical,ion Document NO. 843390 recorded September 4, 1957, also excepting that part of above described property described as follows: Commencing at the point of in ersec:tion of the center line of Sleepy Hollow Road with a line drawn parallel with and 50 feet Northerly of, measured at right angles thereto, the center line of the main track of the Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company as said track was located on VOLUME L 997 April 12, 1971, thence North 79 degrees 56 minutes 00 seconds West along said parallel line 299.394 feet to the point of beginning for the above described land; thence continuing along said parallel line 440.606 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line extended Southerly of premises conveyed to Chicago and Pacific Railroad Company by deed recorded December 27, 1892 in Book 321, Page 304 as Document No. 527; thence North 0 degrees 55 minutes 0 seconds East record, measured North 2 degrees 06 minutes 20 seconds East along the extension of and the Easterly line of said premises, 185.765 feet to the Southerly line of the premises conveyed to said Chicago and Pacific Railroad Company by deed recorded December 16, 1876 in Book 164, Page 575, as Document No. 117, thence South 89 degrees 05 minutes 00 seconds East record, measured South 89 degrees 14 minutes 30 seconds East along said Southerly line 470.89 feet; thence South 9 degrees 43 minutes 06 seconds West, for a distance of 260.147 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 1.55829 acres." Section 2. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law and shall be published in pamphlet form by authority of the City Council. i i s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor i Presented: December 23, 1985 Passed: December 23, 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: I Attest: s/ Marie Yea an Marie Yearman, City Clerk RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING JOINT PETITION BY THE SANITARY DISTRICT OF ELGIN AND CITY OF ELGIN AND THE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FOR EXCEPT- ION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT RELATING TO COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW TRANSPORT AND TREATMENT FACILITIES I - Councilman Gilliam made a motion, seconded by Councilman. Andersen to adopt the aforementioned resolution. Yeas: ,Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. I - 998 VOLUME L RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING JOINT PETITION BY SANITARY DISTRICT OF ELGIN AND CITY OF ELGIN AND THE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY FOR EXCEPTION FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL. PROTECTION ACT RELATING TO COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOW TRANSPORT AND TREATMENT FACILITIES BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL.C,iN, ILLINOIS, that Richard L. Verbic, Mayor, be and is hereby aut;;orized, art behalf of the City of Elgin, and directed to execute an appropriate form pct's;ion with the Sanitary District of Elgin and the Illir;ois Environmental Protection Agency for an exception to the requhe- ments of the Environmental Protection Act relating to the construction and operation of certain combined sewer overflow transport and treatment facilities within the Cite of Elgin and to execute all necessary documents in connection therewith. --S/ Richard L_ yt-?rh i r. Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23, 1985 Adopted: December 23, 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Attest: s,/ Maxie YeakTan Mari, Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED ABATING THE LEVY AND ASSESSMENT OF TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31 1985 IN AND FOR THE CITY OF ELGIN SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER FOUR Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Shales to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmt-n Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters , and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. VOLUME L 999 Ordinance No. T 7-85 AN ORDINANCE ABATING THE LEVY AND ASSESSMENT OF TAXES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1985 IN AND FOR THE CITY OF ELGIN SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER FOUR i WHEREAS, on January 14, 1985 the City Council of the City of Elgin, acting as the governing board of Elgin Speciai Service Area Number Four, passed Ordinance No. S!-85, An Ordinance Providing for the Issue of $1,500,000 Unlimited Ad Valorem Tax Bonds of Special Service Area Number Four of the City of Elgin, Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, and the Levy of a Direct Annual Tax Sufficient to Pay the Principal and Interest on said Bonds; and j WHEREAS, a portion of the levy of the tax for the year 1985 provided in the ordi- nance is unnecessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: j j Section I. That the County Clerk of Kane County, is hereby authorized and directed to abate a portion of the tax of $398,750 for the year 1985 as provided and levied in the ordinance passed January 14, 1985, a copy of which was filed with said county clerk; said tax shall be abated by reducing said sum $25,670 and extending a tax for the year 1985 in the amount of $373,080 against all taxable property situated in the City of Elgin Special Service Area Number Four. Section 2. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the County Clerk of Kane County, Illinois, prior to December 31, j 1985. jl Section 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage in the manner provided by law. I s! Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor I Presented: December 23, 1985 Passed: December 23, 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays Recorded: Published: Attest: s/�^.�de main Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED ABATING THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Shales to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. 1000 VOLUME L Ordinance No. T 8-85 AN ORDINANCE ABATING THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT BONDS WHEREAS, the City of Elgin will have sufficient funds on hand to pay the tax levied by Ordinance T-1277, An Ordinance Providing for Borrowing Money and issuing � Bonds of the City of Elgin, Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, in the Arnount of $2,000,000 for the Purpose of raying the Cost of Constructing Improvements Upcn Cerictirt of the Streets and Intersections Within said City, Including Widening, Repairing and Resurfac- ing, and Providing for the Levy and Collection of a Direct Annual Tax far the Pcyrneni of the Principal and Interest of said Bonds; and WHEREAS, the levy of the tax for the year 1985 provided in the ordinance is unnecessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL a,F THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section 1. That the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties, are hereby authorized and directed to abate the tax of $143,918 for the year 1985 as provided and levied in the ordinance providing for the issuance of $2,000,000 Street Improvement Bonds, passed December 13, 1967, a copy of which was filed with each of snit; county clerks. Section 2. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to file n certified copy of this ordinance with the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Count;es, Illinois, prior to December 31, 1985. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage in the manner provided by law. I I R/ RiC}},,arl _ XPrhic ichard L. Verbic, Mayor I Presented: December 23 1985 Passed: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: i fitest: r � Maxie YYdarman Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED ABATING THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 GENERA(, 0S1Jf'a"ATI3N KATER BONDS, SERIES 1980 Councilman Waters made a atotion, :seconded by CounC lW0aja'n Shales to pass the at'orententioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gi.l.lic—un, moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. VOLUME L 1001 Ordinance No. T 9-85 AN ORDINANCE ABATING THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER BONDS, SERIES 1980 WHEREAS, the City of Elgin will have sufficient funds on hand to pay the tax levied by Ordinance SI-80, An Ordinance Providing for Borrowing Money and Issuing Bonds 'of the City of Elgin, Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, to the Amount of $18,900,000 for Paying the Cost of Constructing Public Improvements in said City, and Providing for the Levy and Collection of a Direct Annual Tax for the Payment of the Principal and Interest of Said Bonds; and WHEREAS, the levy of the tax for the year 1985 provided in the ordinance is unnecessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN; ILLINOIS: Section I. That the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties. are hereby authorized and directed to abate the tax of $1,593,500 for the year1985 as provided and levied in the ordinance providing for the issuance of $18,900,000 General Obligation Water Bonds, Series 1980, passed January 28, 1980, a copy of which was filed with etch of said county clerks. Section 2.That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, prior to December 31, 1985. Section 3.That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage in the manner provided by law. S/ Richard L_ Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23, 1985 Passed: December 23, 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: Attest: P1 ar ie a an Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED ABATING A PORTION OF THE, ANNUALxTAX FOR 1985 FOR GENERAL OBLIGATION PARKING BONDS, "SERIES, 9.8(IP,' Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman ` Shales to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen— Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. 1002 VOLUME L Ordinance No. T 10-85 AN ORDINANCE ABATING A PORTION OF THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 FOR GENE RAL OBLIGATION PARKING BONDS, SERIES :980A WHEREAS, the City of Elgin will have sufficient funds on hand to pay a portion of the tax levied by Ordinance S12-80, An Ordinance Providing for Borrovyiong Mloney and Issuing Bonds of the City of Elgin, Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, to the Amount of 52,600,000 for Paying the Cost of Constructing Puhnic Improvements in the City, and Providing for the Levy and Collection of a Direct Annual Tax for the Payment of the Principal and Interest of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, a portion of the levy of the tax for the year 1985 provided in the ordinance is unnecessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section 1. That the County Clerks of Koine and Cook Counties, are hereby authorized and directed to abate a portion of the tax of $290,625 for the year 1935 as provided and levied in the ordinance providing for the issuance of $2,600,000 General Obligation Parking Bonds, Series 1980A, passed October 22, 1980, a copy of which was filed with each of said county clerks; said tax shall be abated by reducing said sum $90,625 and extending a tax for the year 1985 in the amount of $200,000 against all taxable property situated in the City of Elgin, Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois. Section 2. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, prior to December 31, 1985. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage in the manner provided by law. M Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23 1985 Passed: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: Attest:_ s/ Marie earman Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED ABATING THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 FOR GENERAL OBL:I^:?TION CORPORATE PURPOSE BONDS SERIES 1975 Counciiman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Shales to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. VOLUME L 1003 Ordinance No. T11-85 AN ORDINANCE ABATING THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 FOR GENERAL CBLIGATiON CORPORATE PURPOSE BONDS, SERIES 1975 WHEREAS, the City of Elgin will have sufficient funds on hand to pay the tax levied by Ordinance S5-75, An Ordinance Providing for Borrowing Money anti Issuing Bonds of the City of Elgin, Kane end Cook Counties, Illinois, to the Amount of $3,300,000 for Paying the Cost of Constructing Public Improvements in scid City, and Providing for the Leery and Collection of a -Direct Annual Tax for the Payment of the Principal and Interest of Said Bonds; and WHEREAS, the-,levy of the tax for the year 1985 provided in the ordinance is unnecessary. 1` 10W, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section I. That the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties, are hereby authorized and directed to abate the tax of $117,100 for the year 1985 as provided and levied in the ordinance providing for the issuance of $3,300,000 General Obligation Corporate Purpose Bonds, Stories 1975, passed June 11, 1975, a copy of which was filed with each of said county clerks. Section 2. That the City C'er!.. is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, prior to December 31, 1935. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage in the manner provided by law. sl RiChard L_ Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Fresented: .December'23, 1985 Passed: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: Attest: s-% '1 arse ea Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE ABATING A PORTION OF THE ANNUAL TA}X''FOR 7 1985' FOR CORPORATE PURPOSE BONDS, SERIES 1976 PASSED, Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded •by. Counci:i.'woman Shales to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilii.am, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters - and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. 1004 VOLUME L Ordinance No. T 12-85 AN ORDINANCE ABATING A PORTION OF THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 FOR CORPORATE PURPOSE BONDS, SERIES 1976 WHEREAS, the City of Elgin will have sufficient funds on hand to pay a portion of the tax levied. by Ordinance S4-76, An Ordinance Providing for Borrowing Money and Issuing Bonds of the City of Elgin, Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, to the Amount of $3,075,000 for Paying the Cost of Constructing Pubiic Improvements in said City, and Providing for the Levy and Collection of a Direct Annual Tax for the Payment of the Principal and Interest of said Bonds; and WHEREAS, a portion of the levy of the tax for the year 1985 provided in the ordi- nance is unnecessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF -rHF- CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section I. That the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties, are hereby authorized and directed to abate a portion of the tax of $479,600 for- the year 1985 as provided and levied in the ordinance providing for the issuance of $3,075,000 Corporate Purpose Bonds, Series 1976, passed April 28, 1976, a copy of which was fiied with each of said county clerks; said tax shall be abated by reducing said sum $275,250 and extending a tax for the year 1985 in the amount of $204,350 against c1l taxable property situated in the City of Agin, Kane and Cook Count ie s, Illinois. Section 2. That the City Clark is authorized anal directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the County Clerks of Kane and rook Counties, Illinois, prior to December 31, 1985. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage in the manner provided by law. s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23, 1985 Passed: December 23, 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: Attest: s! Marie Ye man Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED ABATING A PORTION OF THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 FOR 'GENERAL OBLIGATION CORPORATE PURPOSE BONDS, SERIES 1982 Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Shales to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen. Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. VOLUME L 1005 Ordinance No. T13-85 AN ORDINANCE ABATING A PORTION OF THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 FOR GENERAL OBLIGATION CORPORATE PURPOSE BONDS, SERIES 1982 WHEREAS, the,City of EI"gin will have sufficient funds on hand to pay a po.-tion of the tax levied by Ordinance T5-82, An Ordinance Providing for Borrowing Morey and Issuing Bonds of the City of Elgin, Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, to the ,Amount of $?_,950,"000 for Paying the Cost of Constructing Public lmprcvernenis in the City, and Providing for the Levrj and Collection of a Direct Annual Tax for the Payment of the Principal and Interest of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, n portion of the levy of the tax for the year 1985 provided in the ordinance is unnecessary. NOW, THEREFORE,-BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section I. That the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties, are hereby authorized and directed to abate a po:,tion of the tax of $502,625 for the year 1985 us provided and levied in the ordinance providing for the issuance of $2,950,000 Generel Obligation.Corporate Series Bonds, Series 1982, passed August 12, 1982, a copy of which was filed with each of said county clerks, said tax shall be abated by reducinc, said sum $297,900 and extending a tox for the year 1985 in the amount of $204,725 against c11 taxable property situated in the City of Elgin, Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois. Section 2. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, prior to December 31, 1985. ;Section• 3.. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and sifter its passage in the manner provided by law. s� Richa �i j�� Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23, 1985 Passed: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: Attest: - s�/ 'hlarie�Yea .- Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED ABATING A PORTION OF THE ANNUAL TAX ' for 1985 FOR CORPORATE PURPOSE BONDS, SERIES 1983 Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Shales to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and- Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. 1006 VOLUME L Ordinance No. T 14-85 AN ORDINANCE ABATING A PORTION OF THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1935 FOR CORPORATE PURPOSE BONDS, SERIES •1.383 WHEREAS, the City of Elgin will have sufficient •funds or:bard to pay a Portion of the tax levied by Ordinance S5-83, An Ordinance Providing for ,Borrowing -Money r-ind Issuing Bonds of the City of Elgin, Kane and Cask Counties, 111incis, to thz'Arnourrt of $2,180,000 for Paying the Cost of Constructing Public Improvements in the City,. (-,nd Providing for the Levy and Collection of a Direct Annual Tax for the Payment of the Principal and Interest of said Bonds; and WHEREAS, a portion of the levy of the tax for the year 1985 provided in the ordi- nance is unnecessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: . Section 1, That the County Clerks of Kane and. Cook Counties, are .hereby authorized and directed to abate a portion of the tax of $329,112 for the year -x,985 as provided and levied in the ordinance providing for the issuance of $2,180,000 Corporate Purposes Bonds„ Series 1983, passed October 24, 1983, a copy of which was filed with each of said county clerks; suid tax shall be abated by reducing said sum $21,542 and extending a tax for the year 1985 in the amount of $308,370 against all taxable property situated in the City of Elgin, Kane and Cook Co-unties, Illinois. Section 2. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, prior to December 31, 1985. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage in the manner provided by law. G/ Richard L . ye rhir. Richard L. Verbit,-MaycNr, Presented: December 23, 1985 Passed: December 23 , 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: Published: = Attest: sj Marie Y rman Marie Yearman, City Clerk ORDINANCE PASSED ABATING A PORTION OF THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 FOR CORPORATE PURPOSE BONDS, SERIES, 1985 Councilman Waters made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Shales to pass the aforementioned ordinance. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. VOLUME L 1007 Ordinance No. T 15-85 AN ORDINANCE ABAS=ING A PORTION OF THE ANNUAL TAX FOR 1985 FOR CORPORATE PURPOSE BONDS, SERIES 1985 -,-WHEREAS, the.City of Elgin will have sufficient funds on hand to pay a portion of the tax levied• key Ordinance'S6-8S, An Ordinance Authoriz-ing the Issuance of $4,300,000 General Obligotion- Corporate Purpose Bonds, Series 1985, of the City of Elgin, Illinois; and ,'' WHEREAS, a portion of the levy of the tax for the year 1985 provided in the ordi- nance is unnecessary., NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section 1. That the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties, cre 'hereby authorized and directed to abate a portion of the tax of $380,087.50 for the year 1985 as provided and levied-in the ordinande providing for the issuance of $4,300,1300 Corporate Purpose Bonds, Series 1985,passed November 25, 1985, a copy of which was filed W:th each -of said county clerks; said tax shall be abated by reducing said sum $260,000 and extending a to.-,, for the yeor 1985 in the amount of $i 20,087.50 against all taxable property situated in the City of Elgin, Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois. Section 2. That the City Clerk is authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this ordinance with the County Clerks of Kane and Cook Counties, Illinois, prior to December 31, 1985. Section 3. That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and-after- its passage in the manner provided by law. i s/ Ra'chard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23, 1985 Passed: December 23, 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: _ Published: Attest: . . � S/ Marie Ye man .._ •, .. Marie Yearman, City Clerk 1008 VOLUME L AUTHORIZATION OF PAYMENT TO VARIOUS VENDORS Woodland Landfill $20, 520 .50 Nov. 1985 refuse charges. Boncosky Oil Co. 15 ,170.19 Purchase,-;,15:-6Q • ga3,lon -q,,gasoii.ne. Union Oil Co. 2 , 030.10 Purchase.,,2,01�,f crai:lon-s-,,diesel fuel. Crescent Electric 1, 886 .63 Mist,. =e1eG.tricaaL Thompson Elevator 3, 750.00 Elevator inspections. Elgin Courier News 1, 565,60 Nov. 1985 advertising. ` Layne:.-Western Co. 31, 042 . 91 Repairs- to deep. well t##11. -,_.,`_: Fox Valley Fence 2 , 341.00 Baseball backstop at Judson College. Speer Financial 13,664 .43 Services re- $.4,.,,3,90,000_,•.GOB,Bonds . Brown Ink 3 , 578.00 Services re- $4 ,300,_0(10 GOB Bonds . Robert: Johnson 4 , 935 .40 REsid.ential Rebate, P,rogram, 485 Fremont St. Councilman Andersen made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Moylan to approve the above payments. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. P i 4't r 13E3 i - RESOLUTION ADOPTED, AUTHORIZING SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY ( 1098 IROQUOIS DRIVE) Ea I Councilman Andersen made a motion, seconded by Council-m - Van De Voorde to adopt the aforementionEia- re`96 ii—ft Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and,,Mayor .Verbic. Nays Nc-ne:. I f I VOLUME L 1009 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY (1098 Iroquois Drive) WHEREAS, the City of Elgin is the owner of certain real property commonly known as 10984r3',Iu6Lit"D-rWe, EIghi, lllino'ds; and legally described as follows: -Lot�370'in�LorQl's`-Rark,, Manor Unit 10, being a subdivision of part of Lot 2 of the Circuit Court partition of part of Section 6 and Section 7, Township�4—I''North Range`9 East 'oi the Third Principal Meridiori,°in"_Cc6k County, Illinois. (hereafter property); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin has determined that the property is no longer necessary.far=public use'and has further determined that it is necess :ry, and desirable to sell the property; and WHEREAS, Rudolph Reymann and Mary Reymann (hereafter purchasers) have of fered to perchase the property for $i 79500.00. NO%,% 'i HtAFSFORE,=BE-1T RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS, that the City Manager and City Clerk be and are hereby authorized, empowered-and- directed to execute all documents necessary to convey and transfer the property to purchasers upon receipt of $17,500.00. s/ Richard L. Verbic Richard L. Verbic, Mayor Presented: December 23, 1985 Adopted: December 23, 1985 Vote: Yeas 7 Nays 0 Recorded: _ Attest: s/MaYE3R1 Y L• Marie Yearrnari;�City C drk='�' r r RESOLUTION ADOPTED ESTABLISHING FEES- FOR THE USE'`OF'xT14E' " HEMMENS MEMORIAL BUILDING Councilman Andersen made a motion, seconded by Councilman Van De Voorde to adopt the aforementioned resolution. Yeas: Councilmen Andersen, Gilliam, Moylan, Shales, Van De Voorde, Waters and Mayor Verbic. Nays: None. 1010 VOLUME L RESOLUTION °1' ESTABLISHING FEES FOR THE USE OF THE HEMMENS MEMORIAL'BUILDING WHEREAS, the Hemmens Building Advisory Committee of the City of Elgin has reco,T,mended that the fees and charges heretofore established for the use of the Hemens Memorial Building be revised; and ''WHEREAS,,the,City Council of the City of Elgin con&6rs in,4he.,recornmendations of the Hemmens Building Advisory Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CATY: COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: :I it Section 1. That from and after January 1, 1986 fees and charges for the use of the Hemmens Memorial Building shall be in accordance with the,.fol.lowiN schedule: 1. Auditorium Base rental for actual performance shall=be as follows: 1986 _ ai.g87 :�� ,11988 Show Time (Mon. - Thurs.) 270 290 �310 Show Time (Fri. - Sun.) �300310 - 320 (3-Hour Block of Time) Additional time shall be prorated. Second Performance (Mon. - Thurs.) 100 105 $1 10 Second Performance (Fri. - Sun.) l 10 1 15 120 Performance time shall include set changes, interrnissions(s).an&.-.cd'rtain calls. The Auditorium Director shall make the final determination as to the time of a "p gformance .i the "-s.*(pf; 'disagreement. Included shall Lobby, ticket booths, coat rooms, rest rooms, two dressing rooms, two meeting rooms, and custodial services ri lc)oi�f56e3 IV 11. .Exh �ttion Hal 1, Base rental shall be as follows: 1986 1987 1988 .. lMi now Timr- Sun a 80 Thum',; P ; > X e CF ) 5300 $310 $320 Q_f-Tirn e-1', it', ?'.r`' ;"i2 '4" °t ti'..'i CI 5 rn"�1 c 7� �.,r�r� �iti- fWQI AParzte ;�V Ofadene r 6'xAbition Hail auTi ...:>s J: .t .; ' �crl✓ Show Time One/Half Full Hall Rate Personnel working the event shall be additional. Base rental shall include lower coat rooms, rest rooms, and sound system and also includes custodial services after the event. VOLUME L 1011 Ill. Rehearsal Room -- Base rental shall beY as follows: {7o �{[...1� .%_ .r 1986 1987 1988� Rehearsal Room (Mon. - Thurs.) $1 3.00 Hr. $13.50 Hr. ., .$1-4.00 Hr. 11,1JReh sc1'Room (Fri. S' $19.50 Hr. $2Q:25 Hr: $21`.QO k-1r. Base rental shall include custodial services after the event,,,,. There shall be a T r' i iW of hre Lh�ur rs. _ . . IV. Meeting Room 1986 1987` I 988 Meeting Room (plus}.equioment=fees) $8.50 Fir. $9'.00 Hr. $9.50 Hr. _;,. ;Base rental%shall .includ e custodial services after the event. There shall be a minimum rental of three hours. V; - Entire Buildinq Rates for the rental of the entire building shall be as follows: 1986 1987 1988 'Show Time(Mon. - Thurs.) 515 535 555 Show Time (Fri. - Sun.) 540 560 580 rr44,tbiourBlack of-Time)`'"'' .. a� !?"'j t .' 5.lp +.:+ e...,,,�,�yC.3 4 ;gTT±1n3o bC�' ndbase" b,:, . ;V� it .7.1`l9r, `rL�1i,.`�2.1t3� � .: � $ r,, �,-Ott'Hr.� � 84.00 t=in.`'"' -87.00 Hr. { a -T' tT�`"yktij .f4'✓' .�ZiT1�e; Vl. 'Rehearsal and Now-performance use of the Auditorium and/or Exhibition: Hal t!such_4,�-moving- in/out, set-ups, or rehearsals shall be as follows: 1986 1987 1988 _Rehearsal Tire (Mon. - Thurs.) 19.50 H�,_ $20.Z5 Hr. $2,x.00 Hr. S�ehearsal�'Eiiria�e (Fri. -.S ia. 21.50 Hr, $22:25'71111- `'rrP3.00 Hr. If several performance or shows are given by the sai hii tesgVe ') consecutive days, the move-in/out charge shall apply only to the initial pa�Ie-in a.{�E final move-out after the final performance or°-shf* °-,Ariy�o4h r'fCibor'c!aT' s incurred during the consecutive days on which performances.,or,.showt wclej he4r,:shall .be charged,at-the current labor rate. gip;-:Mi 44 €p 1� .4 ' g4'Z"1f"1 SWooc 1012 VOLUME L VII: Discounts Local/Non-Profit: A thirty-five (35) percent discoun-1 dff the base`-rental and rehearsal or move-in/out charge for the auditorium and exhibition_hQll will be .F, _.al!o%ve_1 to organi:_ations evidencing corr�lianc6,4ti'la'�-ttl6vwtoNwlsfand&rds,'" FX s I. The sponsoring organization must have resided within the corporate limits of . .lae Ci?y:of Elgin for at least six (6)smorvttis,pr4 i-44 th°t5,Me'of booking. ;The.opo-hraoring organization shall'.be'kicotpoeA d-,in tlhe Strafe of Illinois as a not-for-profit corporation. Proceeds over and above 4he Yiormal costs of operating said corporation shall be used for the general, social,, health, es, vrol, educational, or recreatioha1 e1i'bre� 'ef the crtizeiit"-6f_ Elgin. 'lraciuded in, the above definition MQY bQ4 c'lvbsr�rel;cgirivs, ctl Gel t-rb$ODy;Yciivic, � �r ove mental and fraternal organ'izlati i ts. E. ..r The above schedule is further supplemented by a list of equipment, service and feature chorges. Estimates fur, special service requirements, stage labor costs � and production needs will be forwarded upon request. V111. Charqes for Equipment, Services and Special Builain9evtires 1986 1,987 t%8' 1. Accoustical Shells 3.25 3.50 $ 3.75 2. Chairs, Metal Folding *30 .35 .40 3. Microphones $ 9.00 10.00 11.00 (I included w/rental) 4. Mirror Shower or Scene Machine $ 21.00 $ 22.00 $ 23.00 5. Motion Picture Screen N/C N/C N/C 6. Music Stands N/C N/C N/C 7, Orchestrg Pit, 3?_.OQ 3 .0 � :�,r t 4�0 Piano CQiiiccer$. �4 . w� ..:6 .Oft.. _' ► ra.f}0 9. Piano -Spinet:'' ` '_. . _ .._:N/C._. ._... N/C N/C 10. Piano - Upright $ 25.00 5 30.0 .:� Piano Tuning '�: z:M M - Per Cost _?'er Cos# er s :I .i2 Podium Nr "3: P 16MM�a�nd 21.0 L �t 14. Projector - Slide '�'" ''8.00 10.0 15. Risers - Band 2.50 $ 2.75 3.00 16. Risers - Choral 1.40 $ 1.60 1.80 17. Spotlights Trouper 32.00 34.00 36.00 18. Strobelight 16.00 17.00 18.00 19. Folding Tables $ 1.50 1.75 2.00. 20, Folding Tables for rental purposes) S 2.75 $ 3.00 3.25 21. Tape Recorder $ 16.00 $ 17.00 18.00 22. Memorex Tqpes Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Plus 10% Plus 10% Plus 10% 23. Light Gels Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost Plus 10% Plus 10% Plus 10% 24. Industrial Truck $ 4.25 $ 4.50 $ 4.75 25. Ki tchen $ 22.00 $ 24.00 $ 26.00 a VOLUME L 1013 26. Technicians $ 11.00 Hr. $ 11.50 Hr. $ .12.00 Hr. 27. Reserve Security Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost _• , ,v _27§,,r,,-Regutqr,Se�urity:,. Per Cost Per Cost Per Cost ,`-tt` 4d:'JFt e�?5.S 72Ya i"�3.,� �3y 1�.t 2ii,r"!5,..'i.:•t,a NOTs,g-, iMipv ;eq iprner�t;;rates -do not include the cost of the operation. Except where otherwise indicated, the rates are on a per show basis. r�,up'tervice is included in the base,rental. However, at the discretion of the building manager, sponsoring organizations will be i' yassessed: for plergLiq p:servirce..when the building is:�Jeftcunusu(3lly messy or rty .cl E.` 9 -� ection.m1,2,3 The sphe�Jmte.:;Qf tCQ)Wst:-and charges herein .estahhsh6d shall not be appliwb:;q'tq,cort#ract,s exeeoted pCtorr#q December 23s 1985; any such caritract shall be subject to the rates and charges in,offectrat.ahe time of the execution of such contract. �. `„3':.. .'._ti. �'i�`Z`7'i'i7t :, f=. sG•h :.� x{0'1 �'A:9�Fi�+f(.r;i - . .,,)^.� a. Richard L. erhic, ayor' R. . Presented: December-,..2-3;i, Adopted: Decemb'6r_.-23 19$5_ Vote:,,Yeas 7 Ngys� 0 07"2'. Recorded: Attest: r4t s/ Ma�Ye an�1 Y�GW� Marie Yearman, Ci4-y.Clerk OL#t S07,,UTI6 `x`ADO 'TED TTIV'IG FORTH TIIE-,-. hI. {PULE _OF`,.CITY pp COUNT MEETING FOR 1 a :)V � tku r, C•l ; Ai CouYi I n Ar &exspp made a 'metion, seconded e " �q"ounci1matn! Vary '']fie V orde `t Adopt th4, aforementioned resolutaah = Yeas: Couinn Aner•se Gil,lam, Moylan,,�,S2xal.es�, Yan ,De, :�oorde, Watt and Mato "AVrbic`. ays: None. �':} �`%., 4 t• .'�` �, ��l!i}(utt k^ '?`. . .1 , -r i:.'1 .. . p . 0 ay n'r. (4 -. YLS��, {��l-.. ��.`�`5 �'..'✓'.� ... { Jq]w/ tkij •As�k 10,14 T 1! VOLUME L RESOLUTION FORTH THE SCHEDULE OF CITY COONCIL :,R,E IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE that 4��i'schedule of City Council Meetings for 1986 shak ELGIN CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS FOR 1986, of-tfieV-ft6le Meeting January 13, 1986 6-.30 P.M. Elgin City Council )vee'ting January 13, 1986 8:00 P.M. Committee of'the Whole Meeting January 27,- 0,% tfkB&P.M. Elgin City Councii Meeting Jon ua�y,27W!1986 Committee of the Whole Meeting February 10, 19866 v Elgin City Council Meeting February 10, 1986 Committee of the Whole Meeting February 24, 1986 6:30 P.M. Elgin City Council Meeting February 24; 1986 8:00P.M. Committee of the Whole Meeting March 10,t 1986 6:30 P.M. Elgin City Council Meeting March 10, 1986 8:00 P.M. Committee of the Whole Meeting March 24 1986 P.M. -Elgin City Council Meeting March-24'71986-- , Committee of the Whole Meeting April '14, 1986 6:30 P.M. Elgin'City Council Meeting April 14, 11986 P.M. �Commi-ttee of the WhoI6,Meefi T ng '-_-`A 6:80 P.M. Elgin City Council Meeting April 28, 11986 _8:00 P.M. Committee of the Whole Meeting Mal?q 9&C., P.M. Elgin City Council Meeting ay ..00 P.M. Committee of the Whole Meeting Aa�-2rl, 1-)986 6':30 P.M. Elgin City Council Meeting May 27 1986 8:00 P.M. Committee of the Whole Meeting June 9, 1986 6:30 P.M. Elgin Clly.�Counqil Meeting %9` 1,986 8:00 Comrrrt4tet_of the Whole Mee irlitL, t `sue j .86 Elgin,City Cap urtcffMeefln�cA/ e hrf:_-�9,v Committee of the' Whole fleeting A Elgin ,'City Cduncil Meeting ;,,July,..141"1-986 1,8:00 R.M. Comrni ttee of"the`Whole 'Meeting ju' I y,28,"1986 6i30 P.M. Elgin City Coijn6il Me61in0 i0o 4 986 P.M. 06mmittee of the Wholefi�efi�g Au§kAt 11 1986 QP e M. Elgin',"City-Council Meeting Au' gurst '13 986 Commilteti,of the Whole-'Meeting August.25, 1986 6 i30.P.M. ,Elgin City Council Meeting -August 25,' 1986 of the Whole Meeting September 8, 1986 ,&,3GP,M. Elgin City Council Meeting -September 8, 1986 8'..00P.M. -CDmmittee.6fi the Whole M6efirfg ptember -22,:1986 .6 OR P.M. Elgin'City C6uricil Meeting 'Septe m ber'.�2,`086 00 P.M. Com-mittee.of the Whole Meeting 'October I I'1965. :4.bo.P.M. Elgin City�Council Meeting , Oc.tobrer,13, 1986 `8* 9"P.M. CamMittee of :the Who' le Meeting Qctober 27 . _�-.030P.M. TM6 El,"in"Ci1y:Cdunc'j I Nte" fi rig, 1 7 zl'*� P.M. c,ober 2 .0 CICTMCM ttee-of the Wh!'M� M�e'f i6g No"mb W 10;'1986 '4",j 0 p.m. Elgin City�Council November 10 1986 8:00 P.M. VOLUME L 1015 .L Committee of the Whole Meeting November 24 1986 - � � ...., 6:30 P.M. Elgirb City ocnc�it'titeettrag` ;) . €.�.._ November 24, 1986 8:00 P.M. Committee of the Whole Meeting4 December 8, 1986 6:30 P.M, :iiliaA Ct}ri ftbuiil `t�ileftn "" :. '!'f: .. 5 -° December 8 1986 B;QQ .M. Committee of ttlab) `dk` #i A December 22, 1986 � 0 . Elgin City Council Meeting^' '' December 22, 1986 8:00 P.M. s/ Richard L. Ver is Richard I_. . ' , " �n ` L. Verbic Mb r Prey led: December 23, .k#8� .Ad6d: December VoterJ:"Yeas 7 Nays O� .At tss#r�°`.`. gict t, ar C. 4-an .1. !�rif f,. ee4 s-iEx :fF„ Marifi�Yeorman, City Clerk 6", + PE-PORTS RECEIVED =f RA D PLACED j sON;;FILE, . �, ;�.• . �'{;r�' ,� �;! Sales 'Tax Report for Se: , 1985 ...p�te��Ec�i+: Cemetery Report for Nowembe� X85 Budget" Summary dated De-c:em"_r ouncilman Gilliam made; a m, , _9n, seconded by; Councilwoman`:. i';r'- 11 h. s to pl"aee the abo. ` Gilliam, < ¢' ' t.s on file.;.: Councie5 rr Moy �r; e.s. Van De Vpode, Waters - n y�r Verbi C. Na s c y SNO @`ii"�vw r ` ' ,if i�F+��`r fit: L Js��. 'e�'� ��fJ..Y`at.`Mg;�, :(•"6� 1 �r'A 1.+� ve##�t � ti'�s;��7 '�v%',-G .t��'� 14�`''�y _6>C+�'z Sri �. � �`',• ,' f f]Y,F-.f f�S M'•, �r "1 ' 1)"!ttT'.'("a. lb. ��' ,tt 5 i.T 4,�� ,.�.,k ;�`�, {.,�,�� - ?'- s fY; � r•YS'�L�'t e# o"�"�� ';'��xi�i'.,1��'�'�� y ry ,•Y e ',tJ1,-=- E fle , el ha �h:�: u ' p �,yfT••S1 t � i n- r `' 'r.. �"'�`!.�!'n:.% t'f•#.f�� /"!a t a.� l�Fyi''sl'"9m}'+�k{'`y•S"�titc..:..�.,�� r�=�: �� f.S�et �••� g'` !.- ' F s°'�1" ' .:. %�• :t:•t�;+t5'Y�l .if{� f '. 7X.�h4 1'1 b•fi413 1016 VOLUME t RECOGNIZE PERSONS P_RESM John Fender, -1220 Cedar Avenue: Our neighbors ta"'the:-mast have 'some serious problems, some they have: sole :-,~sS has. the water problem, they pump it out.-'70f- -Lake Michigan, ..as- we get ours out of the river. Hoffman Estates- ran -out-of - land, they annexed up to our easterh borders almost. -TI ug have Zxpo Park which seems to be tied in :with the-north3= nd bridge and I am' not sure that 'I understand that, -but -,.they also had 8 problem with sewerage, : `guess we- :are going o get rid of their sewerage for them;`-the tvlg.in` "Sanit'i-try:=Dis�r'ic;t is corhmitted to do that. Mayor Verbic: The Metropolitan Sanitary District-six. Mr, Fender: They have another pro `16m -t:& °the eem- t`, t-hey need "a garbage dump. They work all 'suMmer on a-`nev, s te,i= . as the -Courier has carefully informed us,. Monday- the -Ax:l;in.gton Herald revealed a secret, the `bale--fill site will 'be An Bartlett. Now Bartlet does not really want -'the tral.e-€-f1l ,* but they decided they need -to -control -the place--where they will dump their garbage. The $540,000 projected operating fees a year helps Bartlett swallow th-4 -dump. I am afraid that we in Elgin have -jus't"been- given _a .lesson in a war that our neighbors to the�'e:ast hope is over.:hefore . we losers realize it has even stAtted. 'Elgln''s'p�ableTa with the bale-fill site is that it is virtually on our doorstep. N< a what -is Elgin' s_positioh ,an, tha.s ,problem,-.. mayor Volfl acs I Iiw aa1 ou f0-r, =Qo ia_q. VP is . . ss. .tct -uc I--think 'yotiasre='exprested °what eve - - t Counc:i ,..;, , Y �€; it a s" ' ve staff : .,. .W e: �y (�y� .��r{ ^� YNiPIR' V l'ik}r r6y, ;K' Lh� n3�G _ iii... 94'i•J"O. ' f Y 'J rA - f 'r �t`oi and '',thy;:"Mayor e"cs,:,�4�= i#i horge. -of, the x6r-,t st, . Mai or Y09b c,`fttAd, � alit!Ioutd+ meats ii`lat wo to forth- c. :-org:.:meet1ngs, .,,,. AbJC1�11� 1ENm N , v 'C'.bUACilthaiV Anderseh'Mdde a", mdtionj 96d6ft4ed`;by, C6txno_1,ft :1" Gi.lnain">tr'odidjbdrn, the -lt �, find' 1rc� `:::'Vi�rbic. .;r� rs a stc e'. '- t `~meetxing-F:tad iit'hed at 9:55_ p.m. &21e arma City Clerk