HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-28 .4
Resolution No. 07-28
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A LETTER OF INTENT WITH IDOT FOR THE U.S.
ROUTE 20 AND McLEAN BOULEVARD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN,ILLINOIS,that
Olufemi Folarin,City Manager,be and is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Letter of Intent
on behalf of the City of Elgin with IDOT regarding intersection improvements at U.S.Route 20 and
McLean Boulevard, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference.
s/Ed Schock
Ed Schock, Mayor
Presented: February 14, 2007
Adopted: February 14, 2007
Omnibus Vote: Yeas: 7 Nays: 0
Attest:
s/Dolonna Mecum
Dolonna Mecum, City Clerk
s/Jennifer Quinton
Jennifer Quinton, Deputy City Clerk
Illinois Department of Transportation
Division of Highways/Region One/ District One
201 West Center Court/Schaumburg, Illinois 60196-1096
Project and Environmental Studies
U.S, Route 20
At McLean Boulevard
Kane County
August 25, 2006
The Honorable Ed Schock
Mayor
City of Elgin
150 Dexter Court
Elgin, IL 60120
Dear Mayor Schock:
The Illinois Department of Transportation (Department) has completed Phase I
studies for the improvement of U.S. Route 20 at McLean Boulevard with Design
Approval granted on November 16, 2005. This will serve as a Letter of Intent
between the City of Elgin and the Department confirming your concurrence with
the proposed improvement plan and the cost participation responsibilities for the
subject project. This project is currently not included in the Department's Fiscal
Year 2007-2012 Proposed Highway Improvement Program, however it will be
considered for inclusion in future programs, as funding becomes available.
The scope of work includes reconstruction of the U.S. Route 20 at McLean
Boulevard interchange. The proposed improvements include reconfiguration of the
interchange ramps, widening of McLean Boulevard to add auxiliary turn lanes,
semovaLand_realignment of the WeldRoad connection to McLean Boulevard, and
widening of Fleetwood Drive and Lillian Street to provide additional turn lanes.
The U.S. Route 20 bridge over McLean Boulevard will be replaced, and will
provide a larger opening to accommodate a future widening of McLean Boulevard.
This scope of work was discussed in greater detail in coordination meetings with
City staff on July 24, 2002 and October 1, 2003. Further coordination was
performed through letters dated December 31, 2003, October 30, 2003, October 4,
2002, July 12, 2000, and June 30, 2000. Property owners and other stakeholders
were informed through information letters in the fall of 2004 and a presentation to
the Sunset Park Neighborhood Association on December 13, 2004.
Based on previous coordination with the City, specific items identified by the
Department requiring cost participation by the City include traffic signals, new
sidewalks, emergency vehicle pre-emption, roadway lighting, and any utility
relocation costs.
EXHB IT A
The Honorable Ed Schock
August 25, 2006
Page 2
Traffic Signal Modernization
Traffic signal relocation and modernization is proposed at the intersections along
McLean Boulevard at Lillian Street, U.S. Route 20, and Fleetwood Drive. The
total cost of the traffic signal work at these intersections is $1,302,000. Federal
funds may be used for 80% of the traffic signal costs involving Department signals,
with the State and City sharing in the remainder of the cost, based on the
percentage of approach leg jurisdiction. If federal funds are not used for the traffic
signals, the State will assume the responsibility of the 80% federal share. The cost
of the traffic signal work at these locations will be split between the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA), the City, and the Depailment as follows:
Traffic Si•nal Cost Breakdown Table
Improvements ' Cost Split
IDOT
Traffic Signal Modernization - $500,000 $100,000
1 (20%) p,
Temporary Signals-(3 @$45,000 each) - $135,000 ; ;;; $27,000
(20%)
s Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption - $15,000 $0
0%
; 31 Traffic Signal Modernization - $130,000 $0
(0%)
Temporary Signals - $40,000 $0
(0%)
Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption- $6,000 $0
(0%)
3 Traffic Signal Modernization - $130,000 $0
_ (0%)
Temporary Signals - $40,000 $0 33
(0%)
Emergency Vehicle Pre-emption - $6,000 $0
0% ,
Traffic Signal Interconnection .3 .1 $21,000 3 '
Permanent- $200,000 Temporary- $100,000 (7%) `
; „ EE $1,302,000 •-1 $148,000
15% Engineering Fee
Totals .;
t :,
•
The Honorable Ed Schock
• August 25, 2006
Page 3
The City has expressed interest in installing emergency vehicle pre-emption (EVP)
devices on these signals. This item would be a City cost and would be $6,000 per
signalized intersection at Fleetwood Drive and Lillian Street, and $15,000 for'the
U.S. Route 20 at McLean Boulevard interchange. The total cost to the City of
Elgin for traffic signal modernization,including engineering fees,is$466,900.
Energy and Maintenance Costs for Traffic Signals
For the traffic signals along McLean Boulevard and Lillian Street, U.S. Route 20,
and Fleetwood Drive, energy and maintenance costs will continue to be in
accordance to the existing master agreement between the City of Elgin and the
State. Maintenance of the interchange is 100% the responsibility of the State
(reimbursable per master agreement). The breakdown of responsibility is as
follows:
Location Division of Energy Costs
Maintenance Costs
IDOT Elgin IDOT Elgin
McLean Boulevard at U.S.Route 20 100% 0% 0% 100%
McLean Boulevard at Lillian Street 0% 100% 0% 100%
McLean Boulevard at Fleetwood Drive 0% 100% 0% 100%
Sidewalk
The Department is responsible for 100% of the cost for removal and replacement
of existing sidewalk affected by the roadway improvements. Any new sidewalk
requested by the City will be funded on a 50/50 basis between the City and the
Department. The additional sidewalk, requested by the City, is approximately
1,700 lineal feet,as summarized below:
• McLean Boulevard- east side, south end, 5 ft. sidewalks - 500 ft.
• McLean Boulevard - east side, between Fleetwood Drive &U.S. Route 20,
7 ft. sidewalks- 300 ft.
• McLean Boulevard-west side, north end, 5 ft. sidewalks -300 ft.
• Fleetwood Drive - west of McLean Boulevard, 5 ft. sidewalks on both
sides -600 ft. total
The City will continue to maintain the sidewalks. The cost for additional City
sidewalks is approximately $5 per square foot, for a total cost of$45,500. The
City's share of the cost is$26,163,which includes a 15% engineering fee($3,413).
The Honorable Ed Schock
August 25, 2006
Page 4
Roadway Lighting
The Bureau of Electrical Operations has determined that interchange lighting is
warranted as part of this improvement and will be maintained as well as paid for by
the Department. The City has shown interest in additional roadway lighting, as
requested in the letter dated August 20, 2002. The costs associated with the
additional roadway lighting within the corporate limits of the City are 100% local
responsibility. The total cost for lighting of the improvement is$780,000, of which
$565,000 is for the interchange lighting, to be paid for by the Department. The
cost of the City's additional standard roadway lighting is approximately$215,000.
Adding a 15% engineering fee ($32,250) to this estimate, the total City cost
responsibility is $247,250 for new standard roadway lighting as part of the U.S.
Route 20 interchange reconstruction project.
Utility Relocation
Utility facilities installed in highway right-of-way via permit that are in conflict
with the proposed improvement, and therefore require relocation,will be relocated
at no extra cost to the Department,per policy and in accordance with State Statute.
City facilities subject to this condition may include, but are not limited to water
mains, fire hydrants,bridge attachments, storm, sanitary, and/or combined sewers.
Based on a review of the utility information provided to the Department during
Phase I, numerous conflicts are anticipated with the City's sanitary sewer and
water main throughout the project limits. A detailed study of conflicts will
be performed during the Phase II (contract plan preparation), and the City will be
informed of the affected utilities at that time.
Summary of Estimated Costs
The total estimated cost responsibility to the City, based on the available
information collected during the Phase I process is approximately $740,313,p1us
any utility relocation costs that fall outside the Department's cost participation
policies.
At the end of this letter of intent, there is an area where you can state your
concurrence to the cost participation items outlined above. This letter of intent will
be used as a basis during Phase II to develop or amend the existing City/State
agreement. Please return an original signed copy of this letter at your earliest
convenience.
The Honorable Ed Schock
August 25, 2006
Page 5
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Rick
Young, Bureau Chief of Programming, at(847) 705-4393.
Very truly yours,
Diane M. O'Keefe, P.E.
Deputy Director of Highways,
Region One Engineer
By:
Clarita . Lao, P.E.
Engineer of Program Development
Attachments
cc: Joseph Evers, Municipal Engineer
The Honorable Ed Schock
August 25, 2006
Page 6
Project and Environmental Studies
U.S. Route 20
At McLean Boulevard
Kane County
Concur with traffic signals:
- -Yes With condition noted below.
No
Concur with new sidewalks
Yes
No
Concur with roadway lighting:
X Yes
No
General Project concurrence per above:
X Yes
No
Name: Olufemi Folarin
Oh
Signature: ► ��� ��.,.._-
Title: Cit anage
Date: February 14, 2007
Comments(if any):
The City concurs with the traffic signals with the condition that the Illinois Department of
Transportation consider the use of Federal funding on the signal modifications to the
City's signal systems impacted by this project.
Z c► 1 IT 1
1
NI fir •
I
I
J•( 3SDNZ3R ,,
• i-
'.11/1/
„ ;/
N . i
rigi CLIFTON AVENUE \ S° diq .
\ \\\\\t4, / li IliI: i 1
4\ i l' 7
----1 II II :, WESTON AVENUE..c i(i, /, I 1
14! lilt
i
i A f i,, i i .
5
-7,7-.0,4„,:-..1--.•.. � � /j ifil am
; 13.
''';'.7''T
/ ./:: r
.1 / ,/' i . . , 1,
t ) 1(// ,,,/,,, 6
,, .
, i ,,,I ,;./, , i P.
aJ
, , / :/. 1 _---- SIfPARO DRIVE
I I
I I // A! /, i/
i i-I r / /I, //
I / --1
i1-\._” / -
/ /
/
// /:/• % EXHBIT B
/ I 1
( OFEt.
`` } City of Elgin Agenda Item No.
January 19, 2007
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
ir�nntially titable
FROM: Olufemi Folarin, City Manager City Government
Joseph Evers, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Letter of Intent for the Improvement of the U.S. Route 20 and McLean Boulevard
Interchange
PURPOSE
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the Mayor and members of the City Council with
information to consider the approval and execution of a Letter of Intent with the Illinois
Department of Transportation for the improvement of the U.S. Route 20 and McLean Boulevard
Interchange.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council authorize the Mayor to execute the Letter of Intent
committing the City to financial participation and the City's acknowledgement of the future
improvement to the U.S. Route 20 and McLean Boulevard Interchange.
BACKGROUND
City staff has been working with the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) since 2002 on
preliminary engineering plans for improvements to the subject interchange. The Letter of Intent
reflects IDOT's opinion of the City's share in terms of 2006 dollars. A copy of the Letter of
Intent is attached as Exhibit A.
The preliminary engineering, approved by IDOT in November, 2005, reflects a new bridge for
U.S. 20 over McLean Boulevard with a consolidated signalized intersection (currently there are
two intersections — one on either side of U.S.20) to control the access to and from the ramps to
U.S. 20. The project will require significant modifications to the commercial properties just
north of U.S. Route 20 and the Weld Road alignment South of U.S. Route 20. A barrier median
and right-of-way acquisition from the commercial properties will impact ingress/egress and
vehicle circulation/parking for said properties. The Weld Road realignment will move traffic to
Fleetwood Drive thereby making the trip between McLean and Randall more circuitous. As
'0.• future improvements or modifications are made to the properties north of U.S. 20 the City should
•
Letter of Intent for U.S. Rt 20 Project
January 19, 2007
Page 2
include dedication of right-of-way and improvements that appropriately reflect this future
project. A sketch of the improvement is attached as Exhibit B.
The project is currently estimated at $42 million (2006 dollars). Due to this extreme cost, the
State does not anticipate proceeding with final engineering and construction for several years.
The City's financial participation ($740,000 or approximately 2%), in the project would
therefore remain subject to revisions until a future date when an actual agreement would be
executed. The State has requested execution of the attached Letter of Intent to confirm the City's
interest in the project as well as financial participation.
During early discussions the City was informed of project costs that the State considered City
responsibility. The City's portion of the project cost ($740,000) include; lighting, sidewalks,
intersection lighting and permanent signals. The City specifically requested that the project
include street lighting and sidewalks. The Letter of Intent also spells out the maintenance
responsibilities for improvements. The City will be responsible for the cost of electrical service
to all of the signals. The City's franchise agreement with Commonwealth Edison provides
electrical service to signals at no cost. The maintenance and electricity costs for street lighting
will be the City's responsibility. The maintenance of the sidewalks will be the City's
responsibility.
r
COMMUNITY GROUPS/INTERESTED PERSONS CONTACTED
IDOT
Iv F.INANCIAL IMPACT
The City's share of the U.S. Route 20 and McLean Boulevard Interchange project is estimated to
be $740,313 (in 2006 dollars) based on the subject Letter of Intent. There are no funds budgeted
or included in the City's 2007-2011 Financial Plan. The City will need to program funds at such
time as the State and City enter into a formal agreement. It should be understood that inflation
and potential project modifications will increase the City's share. Currently no funds are
allocated in the State's budget through 2012.
vpv LEGAL IMPACT
None
eft. Letter of Intent for U.S. Rt 20 Project
January 19, 2007
Page 3
ALTERNATIVES
1. Reject the Letter of Intent.
2. Accept the Letter of Intent thereby encouraging the State to proceed with the project as
funding becomes available.
Respectfully submitted for Council consideration.
(do)
Attachments
(1"b'
C